Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People's Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 76266-76267 [2015-30898]

Download as PDF 76266 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Notices Postponement of Preliminary Determination DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires the Department to issue the preliminary determination in a countervailing duty investigation within 65 days after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation. However, if the petitioner makes a timely request for a postponement, section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act allows the Department to postpone making the preliminary determination until no later than 130 days after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation. On November 24, 2015, Petitioners 2 submitted a timely request pursuant to section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(e) to postpone the preliminary determination.3 For the reasons stated above and because there are no compelling reasons to deny the request, the Department, in accordance with section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determination to no later than 130 days after the day on which the investigation was initiated. Accordingly, the Department will issue the preliminary determination no later than February 27, 2016. However, because February 27, 2016, falls on a Saturday, the preliminary determination is now due no later than February 29, 2016.4 In accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final determination of this investigation will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determination, unless postponed at a later date. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Dated: December 1, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–30890 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES 2 Bristol Metals LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, Marcegaglia USA, Inc., and Outokumpu Stainless Pipe, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’). 3 See letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Request Extension for Preliminary Determination,’’ dated November 24, 2015. 4 See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:17 Dec 07, 2015 Jkt 238001 [A–570–952; A–583–844] Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge (‘‘NWRs’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) and Taiwan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Horn or Robert Galantucci, AD/ CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2615 or (202) 482– 2923, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On September 17, 2010, the Department published the antidumping duty orders on NWRs from the PRC and Taiwan, as amended.1 On August 3, 2015, the Department initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on NWRs from the PRC and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).2 On August 14, 2015, the Department received a timely notice of intent to participate in the sunset reviews from Berwick Offray LLC and its whollyowned subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, LLC (‘‘domestic interested parties’’), pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 On August 31, 2015, domestic interested parties filed a timely substantive response with the 1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as amended in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982 (September 17, 2010) (‘‘Orders’’). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80 FR 45945 (August 3, 2015). 3 Berwick Offray LLC claimed interested party status as a manufacturer of the domestic like product, pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Department pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited sunset reviews of the Orders. Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to these Orders is narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge, in any length, but with a width (measured at the narrowest span of the ribbon) less than or equal to 12 centimeters, composed of, in whole or in part, man-made fibers (whether artificial or synthetic, including but not limited to nylon, polyester, rayon, polypropylene, and polyethylene teraphthalate), metal threads and/or metalized yarns, or any combination thereof. Imports of merchandise included within the scope of these Orders are currently classifiable under subheading 5806.32.1020, 5806.32.1030, 5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).4 The Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice, provides a full description of the scope of the Orders.5 The Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these sunset reviews are addressed in the Decision 4 Subject merchandise also may enter under HTSUS subheadings 5806.31.00, 5806.32.20, 5806.39.20, 5806.39.30, 5808.90.00, 5810.91.00, 5810.99.90, 5903.90.10, 5903.90.25, 5907.00.60 and 5907.00.80 and under statistical categories 5806.32.1080, 5810.92.9080, 5903.90.3090 and 6307.90.9889. 5 See the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge from the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan’’ from James Maeder, Senior Director, Office I, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’). E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Notices Memorandum. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the Orders were to be revoked. Final Results of Sunset Reviews Pursuant to section 752(c)(3) of the Act, the Department determines that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted-average dumping margins up to 247.65 percent for the PRC and up to 4.37 percent for Taiwan. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: December 1, 2015._ Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–30898 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am] Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–809] Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 2014 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea).1 The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014. This review covers three producers or exporters of the subject merchandise: Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel), Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO), and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH). We preliminarily find that Husteel and HYSCO have made sales of the subject merchandise at prices below normal value. We also preliminarily find that SeAH did not make sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective date: December 8, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Meek, Lana Nigro, or Joseph Shuler, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–2778, (202) 482–1779 or (202) 482– 1293, respectively. AGENCY: 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 79392 (December 30, 2013). 2 For a full description of the scope of the order, see the Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:17 Dec 07, 2015 Jkt 238001 Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is provided as Appendix I to this Notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the respondents for the period November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014. Producer or exporter Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube. The product is currently classifiable under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) numbers: 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.2 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 76267 Husteel Co., Ltd ........................ SeAH Steel Corporation ........... Hyundai HYSCO ....................... Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 1.42 0.00 3.69 Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice.3 Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 2013–2014’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice. 3 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76266-76267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30898]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-952; A-583-844]


Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People's 
Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset 
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of 
Commerce (``the Department'') finds that revocation of the antidumping 
duty orders on narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge (``NWRs'') from 
the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') and Taiwan would likely lead 
to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in 
the ``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.

DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Horn or Robert Galantucci, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2615 or (202) 482-2923, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 17, 2010, the Department published the antidumping 
duty orders on NWRs from the PRC and Taiwan, as amended.\1\ On August 
3, 2015, the Department initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping 
duty orders on NWRs from the PRC and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').\2\ On August 14, 
2015, the Department received a timely notice of intent to participate 
in the sunset reviews from Berwick Offray LLC and its wholly-owned 
subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, LLC (``domestic interested parties''), 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ On August 31, 2015, domestic 
interested parties filed a timely substantive response with the 
Department pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not 
receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party. As 
a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited sunset 
reviews of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow Woven Ribbons 
With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People's Republic of China: 
Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as amended 
in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the 
People's Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 
56982 (September 17, 2010) (``Orders'').
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 45945 
(August 3, 2015).
    \3\ Berwick Offray LLC claimed interested party status as a 
manufacturer of the domestic like product, pursuant to section 
771(9)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    The merchandise subject to these Orders is narrow woven ribbons 
with woven selvedge, in any length, but with a width (measured at the 
narrowest span of the ribbon) less than or equal to 12 centimeters, 
composed of, in whole or in part, man-made fibers (whether artificial 
or synthetic, including but not limited to nylon, polyester, rayon, 
polypropylene, and polyethylene teraphthalate), metal threads and/or 
metalized yarns, or any combination thereof. Imports of merchandise 
included within the scope of these Orders are currently classifiable 
under subheading 5806.32.1020, 5806.32.1030, 5806.32.1050 and 
5806.32.1060 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(``HTSUS'').\4\ The Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by 
this notice, provides a full description of the scope of the Orders.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Subject merchandise also may enter under HTSUS subheadings 
5806.31.00, 5806.32.20, 5806.39.20, 5806.39.30, 5808.90.00, 
5810.91.00, 5810.99.90, 5903.90.10, 5903.90.25, 5907.00.60 and 
5907.00.80 and under statistical categories 5806.32.1080, 
5810.92.9080, 5903.90.3090 and 6307.90.9889.
    \5\ See the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited 
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Narrow Woven Ribbons 
With Woven Selvedge from the People's Republic of China and Taiwan'' 
from James Maeder, Senior Director, Office I, Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (``Decision 
Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and 
in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of 
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The 
signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in these sunset reviews are addressed in the 
Decision

[[Page 76267]]

Memorandum. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the 
likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude 
of the margins likely to prevail if the Orders were to be revoked.

Final Results of Sunset Reviews

    Pursuant to section 752(c)(3) of the Act, the Department determines 
that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or 
recurrence of dumping at weighted-average dumping margins up to 247.65 
percent for the PRC and up to 4.37 percent for Taiwan.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.218.

    Dated: December 1, 2015._
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
    2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-30898 Filed 12-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P