Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People's Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 76266-76267 [2015-30898]
Download as PDF
76266
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Notices
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires
the Department to issue the preliminary
determination in a countervailing duty
investigation within 65 days after the
date on which the Department initiated
the investigation. However, if the
petitioner makes a timely request for a
postponement, section 703(c)(1)(A) of
the Act allows the Department to
postpone making the preliminary
determination until no later than 130
days after the date on which the
Department initiated the investigation.
On November 24, 2015, Petitioners 2
submitted a timely request pursuant to
section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(e) to postpone the
preliminary determination.3 For the
reasons stated above and because there
are no compelling reasons to deny the
request, the Department, in accordance
with section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is
postponing the deadline for the
preliminary determination to no later
than 130 days after the day on which
the investigation was initiated.
Accordingly, the Department will issue
the preliminary determination no later
than February 27, 2016. However,
because February 27, 2016, falls on a
Saturday, the preliminary determination
is now due no later than February 29,
2016.4 In accordance with section
705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final
determination of this investigation will
continue to be 75 days after the date of
the preliminary determination, unless
postponed at a later date.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: December 1, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–30890 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
2 Bristol
Metals LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation,
Marcegaglia USA, Inc., and Outokumpu Stainless
Pipe, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’).
3 See letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Welded Stainless
Pressure Pipe from India: Request Extension for
Preliminary Determination,’’ dated November 24,
2015.
4 See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:17 Dec 07, 2015
Jkt 238001
[A–570–952; A–583–844]
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From the People’s Republic
of China and Taiwan: Final Results of
the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on
narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge (‘‘NWRs’’) from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) and Taiwan
would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping, at the levels
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset
Reviews’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Horn or Robert Galantucci, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2615 or (202) 482–
2923, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On September 17, 2010, the
Department published the antidumping
duty orders on NWRs from the PRC and
Taiwan, as amended.1 On August 3,
2015, the Department initiated sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on NWRs from the PRC and Taiwan
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).2
On August 14, 2015, the Department
received a timely notice of intent to
participate in the sunset reviews from
Berwick Offray LLC and its whollyowned subsidiary Lion Ribbon
Company, LLC (‘‘domestic interested
parties’’), pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i).3 On August 31, 2015,
domestic interested parties filed a
timely substantive response with the
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow
Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan
and the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping
Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as
amended in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic
of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75
FR 56982 (September 17, 2010) (‘‘Orders’’).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
FR 45945 (August 3, 2015).
3 Berwick Offray LLC claimed interested party
status as a manufacturer of the domestic like
product, pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did
not receive a substantive response from
any respondent interested party. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted expedited sunset reviews of
the Orders.
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to these
Orders is narrow woven ribbons with
woven selvedge, in any length, but with
a width (measured at the narrowest span
of the ribbon) less than or equal to 12
centimeters, composed of, in whole or
in part, man-made fibers (whether
artificial or synthetic, including but not
limited to nylon, polyester, rayon,
polypropylene, and polyethylene
teraphthalate), metal threads and/or
metalized yarns, or any combination
thereof. Imports of merchandise
included within the scope of these
Orders are currently classifiable under
subheading 5806.32.1020, 5806.32.1030,
5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).4 The
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice, provides a full
description of the scope of the Orders.5
The Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Decision Memorandum
can be accessed at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these sunset
reviews are addressed in the Decision
4 Subject merchandise also may enter under
HTSUS subheadings 5806.31.00, 5806.32.20,
5806.39.20, 5806.39.30, 5808.90.00, 5810.91.00,
5810.99.90, 5903.90.10, 5903.90.25, 5907.00.60 and
5907.00.80 and under statistical categories
5806.32.1080, 5810.92.9080, 5903.90.3090 and
6307.90.9889.
5 See the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge from the People’s Republic of China and
Taiwan’’ from James Maeder, Senior Director, Office
I, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’).
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Notices
Memorandum. The issues discussed in
the Decision Memorandum include the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the Orders
were to be revoked.
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to section 752(c)(3) of the
Act, the Department determines that
revocation of the Orders would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at weighted-average dumping
margins up to 247.65 percent for the
PRC and up to 4.37 percent for Taiwan.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: December 1, 2015._
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–30898 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]
Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–809]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from
the Republic of Korea (Korea).1 The
period of review (POR) is November 1,
2013, through October 31, 2014. This
review covers three producers or
exporters of the subject merchandise:
Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel), Hyundai
HYSCO (HYSCO), and SeAH Steel
Corporation (SeAH). We preliminarily
find that Husteel and HYSCO have
made sales of the subject merchandise at
prices below normal value. We also
preliminarily find that SeAH did not
make sales of subject merchandise at
prices below normal value. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective date: December 8, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Meek, Lana Nigro, or Joseph
Shuler, AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–2778, (202) 482–1779 or (202) 482–
1293, respectively.
AGENCY:
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 79392
(December 30, 2013).
2 For a full description of the scope of the order,
see the Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:17 Dec 07, 2015
Jkt 238001
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Constructed export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is provided as Appendix
I to this Notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://trade.gov/enforcement.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that the
following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the respondents for the
period November 1, 2013, through
October 31, 2014.
Producer or exporter
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe
and tube. The product is currently
classifiable under the following
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) numbers:
7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025,
7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and
7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
product description remains
dispositive.2
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76267
Husteel Co., Ltd ........................
SeAH Steel Corporation ...........
Hyundai HYSCO .......................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
1.42
0.00
3.69
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with these
preliminary results within five days of
the date of publication of this notice.3
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of
Korea: 2013–2014’’ (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with these
results and hereby adopted by this notice.
3 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76266-76267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30898]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-952; A-583-844]
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People's
Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of
Commerce (``the Department'') finds that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge (``NWRs'') from
the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') and Taiwan would likely lead
to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in
the ``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Horn or Robert Galantucci, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2615 or (202) 482-2923, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 17, 2010, the Department published the antidumping
duty orders on NWRs from the PRC and Taiwan, as amended.\1\ On August
3, 2015, the Department initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping
duty orders on NWRs from the PRC and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').\2\ On August 14,
2015, the Department received a timely notice of intent to participate
in the sunset reviews from Berwick Offray LLC and its wholly-owned
subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, LLC (``domestic interested parties''),
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ On August 31, 2015, domestic
interested parties filed a timely substantive response with the
Department pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not
receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party. As
a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited sunset
reviews of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow Woven Ribbons
With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People's Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as amended
in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the
People's Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR
56982 (September 17, 2010) (``Orders'').
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 45945
(August 3, 2015).
\3\ Berwick Offray LLC claimed interested party status as a
manufacturer of the domestic like product, pursuant to section
771(9)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to these Orders is narrow woven ribbons
with woven selvedge, in any length, but with a width (measured at the
narrowest span of the ribbon) less than or equal to 12 centimeters,
composed of, in whole or in part, man-made fibers (whether artificial
or synthetic, including but not limited to nylon, polyester, rayon,
polypropylene, and polyethylene teraphthalate), metal threads and/or
metalized yarns, or any combination thereof. Imports of merchandise
included within the scope of these Orders are currently classifiable
under subheading 5806.32.1020, 5806.32.1030, 5806.32.1050 and
5806.32.1060 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS'').\4\ The Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by
this notice, provides a full description of the scope of the Orders.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Subject merchandise also may enter under HTSUS subheadings
5806.31.00, 5806.32.20, 5806.39.20, 5806.39.30, 5808.90.00,
5810.91.00, 5810.99.90, 5903.90.10, 5903.90.25, 5907.00.60 and
5907.00.80 and under statistical categories 5806.32.1080,
5810.92.9080, 5903.90.3090 and 6307.90.9889.
\5\ See the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Narrow Woven Ribbons
With Woven Selvedge from the People's Republic of China and Taiwan''
from James Maeder, Senior Director, Office I, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (``Decision
Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and
in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision
Memorandum can be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these sunset reviews are addressed in the
Decision
[[Page 76267]]
Memorandum. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude
of the margins likely to prevail if the Orders were to be revoked.
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to section 752(c)(3) of the Act, the Department determines
that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at weighted-average dumping margins up to 247.65
percent for the PRC and up to 4.37 percent for Taiwan.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: December 1, 2015._
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-30898 Filed 12-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P