Silicomanganese from India: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 76269-76270 [2015-30895]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Notices C. Level of Trade (LOT)/CEP Offset D. Cost of Production Analysis 1. Calculation of Cost of Production (COP) 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the COP Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices F. Constructed Value IX. Currency Conversion X. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–30793 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–880, A–201–847, A–489–824] Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and the Republic of Turkey: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations of Antidumping Duty Investigations Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood at (202) 482–3874 (the Republic of Korea (Korea)), David Crespo at (202) 482–3693 (Mexico), or Rebecca Trainor at (202) 482–4007 (the Republic of Turkey (Turkey)); AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES Postponement of Preliminary Determinations On August 10, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated antidumping duty investigations of imports of heavy walled rectangular carbon steel pipes and tubes (HWR pipes and tubes) from Korea, Mexico, and Turkey.1 The notice of initiation stated that we would issue our preliminary determinations no later than 140 days after the date of initiation. Currently, the preliminary determinations in these investigations are due on December 28, 2015. On November 30, 2015, Atlas Tube, a division of JMC Steel Group; Bull Moose Tube Company; EXLTUBE; Hannibal Industries, Inc.; Independence Tube Corporation; Maruichi American Corporation; Searing Industries; Southland Tube; and Vest, Inc., U.S. 1 See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and the Republic of Turkey: Inititaion of Less-Than-Fair Value Investigations, 80 FR 49202 (August 17, 2015). VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:17 Dec 07, 2015 Jkt 238001 producers on whose behalf the petitions in these cases were filed (hereafter, the petitioners) made timely requests, pursuant to section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.205(e), for a 50-day postponement of the preliminary determinations in the investigations.2 The petitioners stated that a postponement of the preliminary determinations in all three HWR pipes and tubes investigations is necessary to provide the Department with sufficient time to reach reasoned preliminary determinations. Under section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, if a petitioner makes a timely request for an extension of the period within which the preliminary determination must be made under subsection (b)(1), then the Department may postpone making the preliminary determination under subsection (b)(1) until not later than the 190th day after the date on which the administering authority initiated the investigation. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, and because there are no compelling reasons to deny the petitioners’ requests, the Department is postponing the preliminary determinations in these investigations until Februrary 16, 2016, which is 190 days from the date on which the Department initiated these investigations. The deadline for the final determinations will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determinations, unless extended. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Dated: December 2, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015–30897 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–823] Silicomanganese from India: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is partially rescinding SUMMARY: 2 See the petitioners’ letters to the Department dated November 30, 2015. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 76269 its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicomanganese from India for the period of review (POR) May 1, 2014 through April 30, 2015. DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Lindgren, Office VII, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3870. Background On May 1, 2015, the Department published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicomanganese from India for the POR.1 Petitioners,2 in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b), filed a request for an antidumping duty administrative review of two companies: Nava Bharat Ventures Limited (Nava) and Universal Ferro and Allied Chemicals, Ltd. (Universal).3 Subsequently, on July 1, 2015, the Department published a notice of initiation of administrative review with respect to Nava and Universal.4 Nava filed a letter on July 8, 2015, with the Department stating that it had no shipments during the POR.5 Accordingly, the Department sent a no shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on July 15, 2015, requesting a response within 10 days if there was any information indicating that Nava had shipments during the POR. The Department did not receive any notification from CBP that Nava had shipments during the POR. On August 25, 2015, Petitioners withdrew their request for an antidumping duty administrative review of Nava.6 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 24898 (May 1, 2015). 2 Eramet Marietta, Inc. and Felman Production, LLC. 3 See Letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Silicomanganese from India: Request for Administrative Review of Antidumping Order,’’ dated June 1, 2015. 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 37588 (July, 1, 2015). 5 See Letters from Nava, ‘‘Silicomanganese from India; Nava Bharat no shipments letter,’’ dated July 8, 2015 and July 9, 2015. 6 See Letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Silicomanganese from India: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review of Antidumping Order,’’ dated August 25, 2015. E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1 76270 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Notices Partial Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the parties that requested the review withdraw the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Petitioners’ August 25, 2015 withdrawal request was submitted within the 90-day period and thus is timely. Because Petitioners’ withdrawal of their requests for review is timely and because no other party requested a review of Nava, we are rescinding this review with respect to this company, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). As the request for an administrative review for Nava was the only request withdrawn, the instant review will continue with respect to Universal. Assessment The Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For Nava, the company for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as the only reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:17 Dec 07, 2015 Jkt 238001 This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 751 of Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: December 2, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015–30895 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Request for Nominations for Members To Serve on National Institute of Standards and Technology Federal Advisory Committees National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) invites and requests nomination of individuals for appointment to eight existing Federal Advisory Committees: Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board, Manufacturing Extension Partnership Advisory Board, National Construction Safety Team Advisory Committee, Advisory Committee on Earthquake Hazards Reduction, NIST Smart Grid Advisory Committee, and Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology. NIST will consider nominations received in response to this notice for appointment to the Committees, in addition to nominations already received. Registered Federal lobbyists may not serve on NIST Federal Advisory Committees. DATES: Nominations for all committees will be accepted on an ongoing basis and will be considered as and when vacancies arise. ADDRESSES: See below. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Please submit nominations to Robert Fangmeyer, Director, Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 1020, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–1020. Nominations may also be submitted via fax to 301–975–4967. Additional information regarding the Committee, including its charter, current ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 membership list, and executive summary, may be found at https:// www.nist.gov/baldrige/community/ overseers.cfm. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Fangmeyer, Director, Baldrige Performance Excellence Program and Designated Federal Officer, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 1020, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–1020; telephone 301–975–4781; fax 301–975– 4967; or via email at robert.fangmeyer@ nist.gov. Committee Information The Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (Board) was established in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 3711a(d)(2)(B), pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. App. Objectives and Duties 1. The Board shall review the work of the private sector contractor(s), which assists the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in administering the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (Award). The Board will make such suggestions for the improvement of the Award process as it deems necessary. 2. The Board shall make an annual report on the results of Award activities to the Director of NIST, along with its recommendations for the improvement of the Award process. 3. The Board will function solely as an advisory committee under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. App. 4. The Board will report to the Director of NIST. Membership 1. The Board will consist of approximately twelve members selected on a clear, standardized basis, in accordance with applicable Department of Commerce guidance, and for their preeminence in the field of organizational performance excellence. There will be a balanced representation from U.S. service, manufacturing, nonprofit, education, and health care industries. The Board will include members familiar with the quality improvement operations and competitiveness issues of manufacturing companies, service companies, small businesses, health care providers, and educational institutions. Members will also be chosen who have broad experience in for-profit and nonprofit areas. 2. Board members will be appointed by the Secretary of Commerce for threeyear terms and will serve at the E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76269-76270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-823]


Silicomanganese from India: Partial Rescission of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is partially 
rescinding its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
silicomanganese from India for the period of review (POR) May 1, 2014 
through April 30, 2015.

DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Lindgren, Office VII, 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Enforcement and 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-3870.

Background

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 1, 2015, the Department published a 
notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on silicomanganese from India for the POR.\1\ 
Petitioners,\2\ in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b), filed a request for 
an antidumping duty administrative review of two companies: Nava Bharat 
Ventures Limited (Nava) and Universal Ferro and Allied Chemicals, Ltd. 
(Universal).\3\ Subsequently, on July 1, 2015, the Department published 
a notice of initiation of administrative review with respect to Nava 
and Universal.\4\ Nava filed a letter on July 8, 2015, with the 
Department stating that it had no shipments during the POR.\5\ 
Accordingly, the Department sent a no shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection (CBP) on July 15, 2015, requesting a response 
within 10 days if there was any information indicating that Nava had 
shipments during the POR. The Department did not receive any 
notification from CBP that Nava had shipments during the POR. On August 
25, 2015, Petitioners withdrew their request for an antidumping duty 
administrative review of Nava.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative 
Review, 80 FR 24898 (May 1, 2015).
    \2\ Eramet Marietta, Inc. and Felman Production, LLC.
    \3\ See Letter from Petitioners, ``Silicomanganese from India: 
Request for Administrative Review of Antidumping Order,'' dated June 
1, 2015.
    \4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 37588 (July, 1, 2015).
    \5\ See Letters from Nava, ``Silicomanganese from India; Nava 
Bharat no shipments letter,'' dated July 8, 2015 and July 9, 2015.
    \6\ See Letter from Petitioners, ``Silicomanganese from India: 
Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review of Antidumping 
Order,'' dated August 25, 2015.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 76270]]

Partial Rescission of Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the parties that 
requested the review withdraw the request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. 
Petitioners' August 25, 2015 withdrawal request was submitted within 
the 90-day period and thus is timely. Because Petitioners' withdrawal 
of their requests for review is timely and because no other party 
requested a review of Nava, we are rescinding this review with respect 
to this company, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). As the 
request for an administrative review for Nava was the only request 
withdrawn, the instant review will continue with respect to Universal.

Assessment

    The Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries. For Nava, the company for which this review is 
rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at a rate equal to the 
cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of 
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
this notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as the only reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement may result in the presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double 
antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 
written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 751 
of Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: December 2, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-30895 Filed 12-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.