Hot-Rolled Steel Products From India; Scheduling of a Countervailing Duty Proceeding Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA), 75132-75134 [2015-30441]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 75132 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2014, except as noted (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2014 (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:35 Nov 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2014 (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2009, and significant changes, if any, that are PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 23, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015–30197 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 701–TA–405 (Section 129 Consistency Determination)] Hot-Rolled Steel Products From India; Scheduling of a Countervailing Duty Proceeding Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the schedule for issuance of a consistency determination following receipt on November 6, 2015, of a request from the United States Trade Representative (USTR) for a determination under section 129(a)(4) of the URAA that would render the Commission’s action in connection with its countervailing duty investigation regarding imports of hot-rolled steel products from India, in Inv. No. 701– SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices TA–405, not inconsistent with the recommendations and rulings of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in United States—Countervailing Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India (DS436). DATES: Effective date: November 6, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas E. Corkran (202–205–3057), Office of Investigations, or Robin L. Turner (202–205–3103), Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further information concerning the conduct of this proceeding and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.— On December 19, 2014, the DSB of the WTO adopted its recommendations and rulings in the dispute entitled United States— Countervailing Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India (DS436). On January 16, 2015, the United States informed the DSB of the U.S. intention to comply with its WTO obligations in this dispute. On November 6, 2015, the Commission received a request from USTR for a consistency determination under section 129(a)(4) of the URAA that would render the Commission’s action in connection with its countervailing duty investigation regarding hot-rolled steel imports from India not inconsistent with the DSB recommendations and rulings in United States—Countervailing Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India (DS436). (This proceeding involves the Commission’s affirmative determination in the countervailing duty investigation regarding hot-rolled steel imports from India in Inv. Nos. 701–TA–404–408 and 731–TA–899–904 and 906–908 (Final), VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:35 Nov 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 USITC Pub. 3446 (Aug. 2001) and USITC Pub. 3468 (Nov. 2001).) This request follows from the Commission’s affirmative advisory report on October 23, 2015 in response to USTR’s request, under section 129(a)(1) of the URAA, that Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 permitted the Commission to take steps in connection with its countervailing duty investigation regarding imports of hot-rolled steel products from India in Investigation No. 701–TA–405 that would render its action in that proceeding not inconsistent with the DSB recommendations and rulings in DS436. The Commission must issue its consistency determination within 120 days of the section 129(a)(4) request, or by March 7, 2016. Participation in this proceeding and public service list.—Those persons who were interested parties participating in the original countervailing duty investigation regarding imports of hotrolled steel products from India (i.e., persons listed on the Commission Secretary’s service list for Inv. No. 701– TA–405 (Final)), in addition to the Government of India, may participate in this proceeding. If an interested party is a successor firm to an interested party that participated in the original countervailing duty investigation regarding imports of hot-rolled steel products from India, please so indicate and describe the relationship. Interested parties, as described above, wishing to participate in this proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, no later than December 11, 2015. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigation. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI regarding this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in this proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than December 15, 2015. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to this proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Limitations on the scope of this proceeding.—This proceeding is being conducted in order for the Commission to make a determination that would PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 75133 render its determination in the countervailing duty investigation regarding imports of hot-rolled steel products from India, in Inv. No. 701– TA–405, not inconsistent with the DSB recommendations and rulings in DS436. Thus, this proceeding only involves issues related to the DSB recommendations and rulings and does not involve issues that were not in dispute in DS436 or on which the United States was found in conformity with its obligations under the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. The DSB recommendations and rulings in this regard are set out in paragraphs 4.587 to 4.600 of the Appellate Body report (WT/ DS436/AB/R) (https://www.wto.org/ english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ ds436_e.htm); its conclusions based on these findings is set out in paragraph 5.1(h)(i) of the report. Any material in the interested parties’ written comments that addresses any issue beyond those set forth in these paragraphs will be disregarded. Staff report.—The supplemental staff report in this proceeding will be placed in the nonpublic record on December 21, 2015, and a public version will be issued thereafter. Written submissions.—Each party who is an interested party may submit one set of written comments to the Commission. Written comments will be limited to no more than fifty (50) double-spaced and single-sided pages of textual material. The deadline for filing written comments is January 8, 2016. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s Web site at https:// edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, will not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to this proceeding must be served on all other parties to this proceeding (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1 75134 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and section 129 of the URAA. Issued: November 25, 2015. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015–30441 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure Judicial Conference of the United States, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. AGENCY: The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will hold a twoday meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: https:// www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/ records-and-archives-rules-committees/ agenda-books. DATES: January 7–8, 2016. Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: Royal Palms Hotel, 5200 East Camelback Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502–1820. SUMMARY: The consent decree settles claims against the owner and manager of 52 housing units in 50 separate properties located in or near Rockford, Illinois. The claims were brought on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development under the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act, 42 U.S.C. 4851 et seq. (‘‘Lead Hazard Reduction Act’’). The United States alleged in the complaint that the Defendant failed to make one or more of the disclosures or to complete one or more of the disclosure activities required by the Lead Hazard Reduction Act. Under the Consent Decree, the Defendant will certify that he is complying with residential lead paint notification requirements. The Defendant will submit a plan for window replacement work and will replace all windows known to or believed to contain lead-based paint in these 52 housing units owned or managed by Defendant that are not certified lead-based paint free. In addition, Defendant will abate leadbased paint hazards on friction and impact surfaces, stabilize other leadbased paint hazards, and pay an administrative penalty of $5,000. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. Hardesty, D.J. Ref. # 90–5–1–1–10760. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments: Send them to: By e-mail ...... Dated: November 24, 2015. Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules Committee Secretary. pubcomment-ees.enrd@ usdoj.gov. Assistant Attorney General U.S. DOJ—ENRD P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044– 7611. By mail ......... [FR Doc. 2015–30345 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210–55–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act On November 24, 2015, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Dennis Hardesty, Civil Action No. 3:15 C 50295. VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:35 Nov 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: https:// www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of the proposed Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Please enclose a check or money order for $14.00 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Maureen Katz, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2015–30334 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Asbestos in Shipyards Standard ACTION: Notice. On November 30, 2015, the Department of Labor (DOL) will submit the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sponsored information collection request (ICR) titled, ‘‘Asbestos in Shipyards Standard,’’ to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval for continued use, without change, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Public comments on the ICR are invited. DATES: The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives on or before December 31, 2015. ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation; including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained free of charge from the RegInfo.gov Web site at https:// www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201511-1218-004 (this link will only become active on December 1, 2015) or by contacting Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693– 4129, TTY 202–693–8064, (these are not toll-free numbers) or by email at DOL_ PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Submit comments about this request by mail or courier to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL–OSHA, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 202– 395–5806 (this is not a toll-free number); or by email: OIRA_ submission@omb.eop.gov. Commenters are encouraged, but not required, to send a courtesy copy of any comments by mail or courier to the U.S. Department of Labor-OASAM, Office of SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 230 (Tuesday, December 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75132-75134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 701-TA-405 (Section 129 Consistency Determination)]


Hot-Rolled Steel Products From India; Scheduling of a 
Countervailing Duty Proceeding Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act 
(URAA)

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the schedule for 
issuance of a consistency determination following receipt on November 
6, 2015, of a request from the United States Trade Representative 
(USTR) for a determination under section 129(a)(4) of the URAA that 
would render the Commission's action in connection with its 
countervailing duty investigation regarding imports of hot-rolled steel 
products from India, in Inv. No. 701-

[[Page 75133]]

TA-405, not inconsistent with the recommendations and rulings of the 
Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 
United States--Countervailing Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon 
Steel Flat Products from India (DS436).

DATES: Effective date: November 6, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas E. Corkran (202-205-3057), 
Office of Investigations, or Robin L. Turner (202-205-3103), Office of 
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
    For further information concerning the conduct of this proceeding 
and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 
201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background.-- On December 19, 2014, the DSB of the WTO adopted its 
recommendations and rulings in the dispute entitled United States--
Countervailing Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 
Products from India (DS436). On January 16, 2015, the United States 
informed the DSB of the U.S. intention to comply with its WTO 
obligations in this dispute. On November 6, 2015, the Commission 
received a request from USTR for a consistency determination under 
section 129(a)(4) of the URAA that would render the Commission's action 
in connection with its countervailing duty investigation regarding hot-
rolled steel imports from India not inconsistent with the DSB 
recommendations and rulings in United States--Countervailing Measures 
on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India (DS436). 
(This proceeding involves the Commission's affirmative determination in 
the countervailing duty investigation regarding hot-rolled steel 
imports from India in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-404-408 and 731-TA-899-904 and 
906-908 (Final), USITC Pub. 3446 (Aug. 2001) and USITC Pub. 3468 (Nov. 
2001).) This request follows from the Commission's affirmative advisory 
report on October 23, 2015 in response to USTR's request, under section 
129(a)(1) of the URAA, that Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 
permitted the Commission to take steps in connection with its 
countervailing duty investigation regarding imports of hot-rolled steel 
products from India in Investigation No. 701-TA-405 that would render 
its action in that proceeding not inconsistent with the DSB 
recommendations and rulings in DS436. The Commission must issue its 
consistency determination within 120 days of the section 129(a)(4) 
request, or by March 7, 2016.
    Participation in this proceeding and public service list.--Those 
persons who were interested parties participating in the original 
countervailing duty investigation regarding imports of hot-rolled steel 
products from India (i.e., persons listed on the Commission Secretary's 
service list for Inv. No. 701-TA-405 (Final)), in addition to the 
Government of India, may participate in this proceeding. If an 
interested party is a successor firm to an interested party that 
participated in the original countervailing duty investigation 
regarding imports of hot-rolled steel products from India, please so 
indicate and describe the relationship. Interested parties, as 
described above, wishing to participate in this proceeding as parties 
must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, 
as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, no later than 
December 11, 2015. The Secretary will maintain a public service list 
containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their 
representatives, who are parties to the investigation.
    Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under 
an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary 
will make BPI regarding this proceeding available to authorized 
applicants under the APO issued in this proceeding, provided that the 
application is made no later than December 15, 2015. Authorized 
applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 
1677(9), who are parties to this proceeding. A separate service list 
will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to 
receive BPI under the APO.
    Limitations on the scope of this proceeding.--This proceeding is 
being conducted in order for the Commission to make a determination 
that would render its determination in the countervailing duty 
investigation regarding imports of hot-rolled steel products from 
India, in Inv. No. 701-TA-405, not inconsistent with the DSB 
recommendations and rulings in DS436. Thus, this proceeding only 
involves issues related to the DSB recommendations and rulings and does 
not involve issues that were not in dispute in DS436 or on which the 
United States was found in conformity with its obligations under the 
WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. The DSB 
recommendations and rulings in this regard are set out in paragraphs 
4.587 to 4.600 of the Appellate Body report (WT/DS436/AB/R) (https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds436_e.htm); its 
conclusions based on these findings is set out in paragraph 5.1(h)(i) 
of the report. Any material in the interested parties' written comments 
that addresses any issue beyond those set forth in these paragraphs 
will be disregarded.
    Staff report.--The supplemental staff report in this proceeding 
will be placed in the nonpublic record on December 21, 2015, and a 
public version will be issued thereafter.
    Written submissions.--Each party who is an interested party may 
submit one set of written comments to the Commission. Written comments 
will be limited to no more than fifty (50) double-spaced and single-
sided pages of textual material. The deadline for filing written 
comments is January 8, 2016. All written submissions must conform with 
the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules; any 
submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of 
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The 
Commission's Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission's Web 
site at https://edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the Commission's rules 
with respect to electronic filing.
    Additional written submissions to the Commission, including 
requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, will not 
be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, 
or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a 
Commissioner or Commission staff.
    In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's 
rules, each document filed by a party to this proceeding must be served 
on all other parties to this proceeding (as identified by either the 
public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be 
timely filed. The Secretary will not

[[Page 75134]]

accept a document for filing without a certificate of service.

    Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and section 129 of the URAA.

    Issued: November 25, 2015.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-30441 Filed 11-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.