Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 804(g), 74829-74831 [2015-30242]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Notices
The fees that the Exchange proposes
to refund to eligible Specialists and
Market Makers represent the difference
between the Variable Active SQF Port
Fees and the Fixed Active SQF Port Fee
that became operative on May 1, 2015,
each subject to the $42,000 monthly
cap.20 For example, according to the
Exchange, if Specialist A was assessed
and paid a Variable Active SQF Port Fee
of $16,000 for the month of April 2015
(4 ports at $4,000 per port) whereas the
Specialist would have paid only a
$5,000 Fixed Active SQF Port Fee if this
fee had been operative in April (4 ports
at $1,250 per port), the Exchange would
pay that member a refund amount of
$11,000. In addition, if Market Maker B
was assessed and paid a Variable Active
SQF Port Fee of $42,000 for the month
of April 2015 (8 ports at $15,000 per
port for an uncapped total of $120,000,
to which the cap was applied) whereas
the Market Maker would have paid only
a $10,000 Fixed Active SQF Port Fee if
this fee had been operative in April (8
ports at $1,250 per port), the Exchange
would pay that member a refund
amount of $32,000.21 The Exchange
notes that the payment of a refund to
eligible Specialists and Market Makers
is unique to April 2015 only and applies
only to the April 2015 Billing Period.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Discussion and Commission’s
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.22 In particular,
approval of the retroactive application
of the proposal is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,23 which
requires that the rules of a national
securities exchange provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
members and issuers and other parties
using its facilities.
The Commission notes that the refund
the Exchange proposes to pay would
have a retroactive effect on eligible
2015, but had to pay higher fees because the filing
to delete the Variable Active SQF Port Fees was
initially rejected by the Commission. See Notice,
supra note 3, at 61537, n.6.
20 The Exchange represents that a few members
reached the cap of $42,000 for the Variable Active
SQF Port Fees and would have also reached the cap
of $42,000 for the Fixed Active SQF Port Fee.
According to the Exchange, these members did not
pay any overage and would not be eligible for a
refund. See Notice, supra note 3, at 61538, n.13.
21 See Notice, supra note 3, at 61538.
22 Additionally, in approving the proposed rule
change, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:23 Nov 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
Specialists and Market Makers because
these members of the Exchange would
effectively be subject to the Fixed Active
SQF Port Fee during the month of April
2015, which was a month that the
Variable Active SQF Port Fees were
operative under the Exchange’s rules.
The Commission further notes that the
proposed change from the Variable
Active SQF Port Fees to the Fixed
Active SQF Port Fee was contained in
an April 2015 submission by the
Exchange for immediate effectiveness
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 24 of the
Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 25 thereunder;
however that submission was rejected
by the Commission because it was not
filed in accordance with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder.26 The
proposed fee changes would otherwise
qualify for immediate effectiveness
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)27 of the
Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder.28
However, because the proposed rule
change seeks retroactive application of a
fee change, the Exchange filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,29 seeking
approval retroactive to April 1, 2015.
Retroactive approval of this proposal
allows the proposed rule change to take
effect for the month of April 2015.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,30 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
Phlx–2015–79) be, and hereby is,
approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.31
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–30332 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
24 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
26 See 17 CFR 240.19b–4 and 17 CFR 249.819
Appendix A.
27 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
28 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
29 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
30 Id.
31 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
25 17
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74829
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–76506; File No. SR–ISE–
2015–30]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Rule 804(g)
November 23, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
10, 2015, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed
rule change, as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 804(g) to require Clearing Member
approval for market makers to resume
trading after a market-wide speed bump
is triggered. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.ise.com), at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Rule 804(g) on
‘‘Automated Quotation Adjustments’’ to
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
74830
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Notices
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
require Clearing Member 3 approval for
Primary Market Makers (‘‘PMMs’’) and
Competitive Market Makers (‘‘CMMs’’)
(collectively, ‘‘market makers’’) to
resume trading after a market-wide
speed bump is triggered. The Exchange
offers market makers functionality
whereby the Exchange will
automatically remove a market maker’s
quote in all series or complex order
strategies in an options class if a
‘‘curtailment event’’ occurs based on
parameters set by the market maker on
a class-by-class basis.4 In particular, the
Exchange will automatically remove a
market maker’s quote in a class when,
during a time period established by the
market maker, the market maker
exceeds: (i) The specified number of
total contracts in the class, (ii) the
specified percentage of the total size of
the market maker’s quotes in the class,
(iii) the specified absolute value of the
net between contracts bought and
contracts sold in the class, or (iv) the
specified absolute value of the net
between (a) calls purchased plus puts
sold in the class, and (b) calls sold plus
puts purchased in the class.5 In
addition, the Exchange provides marketwide functionality whereby a market
maker’s quote in all options classes are
automatically cancelled if, during a
configurable time period, the total
number of curtailment events in simple
and complex instruments exceeds a
market-wide parameter set by the
market maker.6 This market-wide
functionality, which is available for ISE
only or across both ISE and ISE’s
affiliate, ISE Gemini, LLC,7 is useful to
members as numerous curtailment
events triggered across multiple options
classes, and if chosen, multiple
exchanges, may signify a larger problem
being experienced by the market maker
that warrants its quotes being removed
from the market. Currently, the
Exchange only requires that a market
maker notify Market Operations of its
intention to reenter the market to
resume trading after the market-wide
speed bump has been activated. Due to
the significant nature of events that may
trigger this market-wide speed bump
functionality, the Exchange now
proposes also to require Clearing
3 The term ‘‘Clearing Member’’ means a Member
that is self-clearing or an Electronic Access Member
that clears Exchange Transactions for other
Members of the Exchange. See Rule 100(a)(8).
4 See Rule 804(g)(i) for simple instruments, and
Supplementary Material .04 to Rule 722 for
complex instruments.
5 Id.
6 See Rule 804(g)(ii). This functionality is known
as ‘‘market-wide speed bump’’ and is the subject of
this filing.
7 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:23 Nov 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
Member approval prior to allowing the
market maker to resume quoting.
Pursuant to the proposed rule change, a
market maker must notify its Clearing
Member(s) when it is ready to resume
trading following a market-wide speed
bump. Exchange staff may also notify
the Clearing Member(s) when the
market maker’s quotes have been
removed, to facilitate a better response
time. Each Clearing Member must then
contact the Exchange directly to give
their authorization for the market maker
to resume trading.8
Each market maker authorized to
trade on the Exchange must obtain from
a Clearing Member a ‘‘Market Maker
Letter of Guarantee’’ wherein the
Clearing Member accepts financial
responsibility for all Exchange
transactions made by the market
maker.9 The Exchange believes that it is
appropriate to require Clearing Member
approval before a market maker can
reenter the market after the market-wide
speed bump has been triggered as the
Clearing Member guarantees the market
makers trades, and therefore bears
ultimate financial risk associated with
those transactions. The Exchange notes
that while not all market makers are
Clearing Members, all market makers
require a Clearing Member’s consent to
clear transactions on their behalf in
order to conduct business on the
Exchange. As the Clearing Member
ultimately bears the risk for a trade they
clear on any market makers behalf, the
Exchange believes it is reasonable to
require that the Clearing Member
authorize the market maker to continue
trading after the market-wide speed
bump is triggered.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.10 In particular, the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,11 because it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change removes
8 If a market maker has multiple Clearing
Members, it must receive approval from each
Clearing Member to resume trading.
9 See Rule 808.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
impediments to and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market by
requiring that Clearing Members
authorize continued trading by a market
maker after that market maker triggers a
market-wide speed bump. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because it will permit Clearing Members
with a financial interest in a market
maker’s risk management to better
monitor and manage the potential risks
assumed by that market maker. The
Exchange already shares market makers’
risk settings with their Clearing
Members in order to assist those
Clearing Members in monitoring risks at
firms on whose behalf they clear
trades.12 The proposed rule change
would further assist Clearing Members
in monitoring risk, and provide these
Clearing Members with greater control
and flexibility over their risk tolerance
and exposure. Because the Clearing
Member guarantees all of the market
maker’s trades it is in a unique position
to objectively evaluate the risk of a
market maker reentering the market
following a serious systems or other
issue. While in some cases this may
result in a minimal delay for a market
maker that wants to reenter the market
quickly following a market-wide speed
bump, the Exchange believes that
Clearing Member approval is
appropriate to ensure that the market
maker does not prematurely enter the
market without adequate safeguards in
place.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the
Act 13 in that it does not impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not designed to
address any aspect of competition, but
is rather intended to provide additional
safeguards by requiring Clearing
Member approval before market makers
are allowed to reenter the market
following a market-wide speed bump.
The Exchange believes that this would
allow Clearing Members to better
monitor and manage the potential risks
assumed by market makers on whose
behalf they have executed a Market
Maker Letter of Guarantee, and does not
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74623
(April 1, 2015), 80 FR 18447 (April 6, 2015) (SR–
ISE–2015–12).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Notices
impose any unnecessary burden on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the publication date
of this notice in the Federal Register or
within such longer period up to 90 days
(i) as the Commission may designate if
it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons
for so finding or (ii) as to which the selfregulatory organization consents, the
Commission will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ISE–2015–30 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2015–30. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:23 Nov 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2015–30 and should be submitted on or
before December 21, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–30242 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[License No. 05/05–0298]
LaSalle Capital Group II–A, L.P.; Notice
Seeking Exemption Under Section 312
of the Small Business Investment Act,
Conflicts of Interest
Notice is hereby given that LaSalle
Capital Group II–A, L.P. 70 W Madison
Street, Suite 5710, Chicago, IL 60602, a
Federal Licensee under the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), in connection
with the financing of a small concern,
has sought an exemption under Section
312 of the Act and Section 107.730,
Financings which Constitute Conflicts
of Interest of the Small Business
Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and
Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). LaSalle
Capital Group II–A, L.P. proposes to
merge Westminster Foods II, LLC, 1
Scale Avenue, Suite 8, Rutland,
Vermont 05701 and Dr. Lucy’s LLC,
7420 Central Business Park Drive, Suite
1, Norfolk, Virginia 23513 together. The
financing is brought within the purview
of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations
because Westminster Foods II, LLC and
Dr. Lucy’s, LLC all Associates of LaSalle
Capital Group II–A, L.P., will merge
together as Westminster Foods II, LLC,
14 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74831
and therefore this transaction is
considered a financing of an Associate
requiring prior SBA approval.
Notice is hereby given that any
interested person may submit written
comments on the transaction, within
fifteen days of the date of this
publication, to the Associate
Administrator for Investment, U.S.
Small Business Administration, 409
Third Street SW., Washington, DC
20416.
Dated: November 18, 2015.
John R. Williams,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator,
Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2015–30246 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 9364]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations:
‘‘Everywhen: The Eternal Present in
Indigenous Art from Australia’’
Exhibition
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No.
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby
determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Everywhen:
The Eternal Present in Indigenous Art
from Australia,’’ imported from abroad
for temporary exhibition within the
United States, are of cultural
significance. The objects are imported
pursuant to loan agreements with the
foreign owners or custodians. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at the Harvard Art
Museums, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
from on about February 5, 2016, until on
or about September 18, 2016, and at
possible additional exhibitions or
venues yet to be determined, is in the
national interest. I have ordered that
Public Notice of these Determinations
be published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the imported objects, contact the Office
of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs
in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S.
Department of State (telephone: 202–
632–6471; email: section2459@
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 229 (Monday, November 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74829-74831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30242]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-76506; File No. SR-ISE-2015-30]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 804(g)
November 23, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 10, 2015, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 804(g) to require Clearing
Member approval for market makers to resume trading after a market-wide
speed bump is triggered. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site (https://www.ise.com), at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 804(g) on
``Automated Quotation Adjustments'' to
[[Page 74830]]
require Clearing Member \3\ approval for Primary Market Makers
(``PMMs'') and Competitive Market Makers (``CMMs'') (collectively,
``market makers'') to resume trading after a market-wide speed bump is
triggered. The Exchange offers market makers functionality whereby the
Exchange will automatically remove a market maker's quote in all series
or complex order strategies in an options class if a ``curtailment
event'' occurs based on parameters set by the market maker on a class-
by-class basis.\4\ In particular, the Exchange will automatically
remove a market maker's quote in a class when, during a time period
established by the market maker, the market maker exceeds: (i) The
specified number of total contracts in the class, (ii) the specified
percentage of the total size of the market maker's quotes in the class,
(iii) the specified absolute value of the net between contracts bought
and contracts sold in the class, or (iv) the specified absolute value
of the net between (a) calls purchased plus puts sold in the class, and
(b) calls sold plus puts purchased in the class.\5\ In addition, the
Exchange provides market-wide functionality whereby a market maker's
quote in all options classes are automatically cancelled if, during a
configurable time period, the total number of curtailment events in
simple and complex instruments exceeds a market-wide parameter set by
the market maker.\6\ This market-wide functionality, which is available
for ISE only or across both ISE and ISE's affiliate, ISE Gemini,
LLC,\7\ is useful to members as numerous curtailment events triggered
across multiple options classes, and if chosen, multiple exchanges, may
signify a larger problem being experienced by the market maker that
warrants its quotes being removed from the market. Currently, the
Exchange only requires that a market maker notify Market Operations of
its intention to reenter the market to resume trading after the market-
wide speed bump has been activated. Due to the significant nature of
events that may trigger this market-wide speed bump functionality, the
Exchange now proposes also to require Clearing Member approval prior to
allowing the market maker to resume quoting. Pursuant to the proposed
rule change, a market maker must notify its Clearing Member(s) when it
is ready to resume trading following a market-wide speed bump. Exchange
staff may also notify the Clearing Member(s) when the market maker's
quotes have been removed, to facilitate a better response time. Each
Clearing Member must then contact the Exchange directly to give their
authorization for the market maker to resume trading.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The term ``Clearing Member'' means a Member that is self-
clearing or an Electronic Access Member that clears Exchange
Transactions for other Members of the Exchange. See Rule 100(a)(8).
\4\ See Rule 804(g)(i) for simple instruments, and Supplementary
Material .04 to Rule 722 for complex instruments.
\5\ Id.
\6\ See Rule 804(g)(ii). This functionality is known as
``market-wide speed bump'' and is the subject of this filing.
\7\ Id.
\8\ If a market maker has multiple Clearing Members, it must
receive approval from each Clearing Member to resume trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each market maker authorized to trade on the Exchange must obtain
from a Clearing Member a ``Market Maker Letter of Guarantee'' wherein
the Clearing Member accepts financial responsibility for all Exchange
transactions made by the market maker.\9\ The Exchange believes that it
is appropriate to require Clearing Member approval before a market
maker can reenter the market after the market-wide speed bump has been
triggered as the Clearing Member guarantees the market makers trades,
and therefore bears ultimate financial risk associated with those
transactions. The Exchange notes that while not all market makers are
Clearing Members, all market makers require a Clearing Member's consent
to clear transactions on their behalf in order to conduct business on
the Exchange. As the Clearing Member ultimately bears the risk for a
trade they clear on any market makers behalf, the Exchange believes it
is reasonable to require that the Clearing Member authorize the market
maker to continue trading after the market-wide speed bump is
triggered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Rule 808.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\10\ In
particular, the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\11\ because it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change removes
impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market by
requiring that Clearing Members authorize continued trading by a market
maker after that market maker triggers a market-wide speed bump. The
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because it will permit
Clearing Members with a financial interest in a market maker's risk
management to better monitor and manage the potential risks assumed by
that market maker. The Exchange already shares market makers' risk
settings with their Clearing Members in order to assist those Clearing
Members in monitoring risks at firms on whose behalf they clear
trades.\12\ The proposed rule change would further assist Clearing
Members in monitoring risk, and provide these Clearing Members with
greater control and flexibility over their risk tolerance and exposure.
Because the Clearing Member guarantees all of the market maker's trades
it is in a unique position to objectively evaluate the risk of a market
maker reentering the market following a serious systems or other issue.
While in some cases this may result in a minimal delay for a market
maker that wants to reenter the market quickly following a market-wide
speed bump, the Exchange believes that Clearing Member approval is
appropriate to ensure that the market maker does not prematurely enter
the market without adequate safeguards in place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74623 (April 1,
2015), 80 FR 18447 (April 6, 2015) (SR-ISE-2015-12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)(8) of the Act \13\ in that it does not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not designed to
address any aspect of competition, but is rather intended to provide
additional safeguards by requiring Clearing Member approval before
market makers are allowed to reenter the market following a market-wide
speed bump. The Exchange believes that this would allow Clearing
Members to better monitor and manage the potential risks assumed by
market makers on whose behalf they have executed a Market Maker Letter
of Guarantee, and does not
[[Page 74831]]
impose any unnecessary burden on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the publication date of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2015-30 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2015-30. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2015-30 and should be
submitted on or before December 21, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-30242 Filed 11-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P