Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Policy Relating to Trade Reports for Exchange Traded Products, 72126-72129 [2015-29395]

Download as PDF 72126 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 2015 / Notices SEC’s Web site. Doors will open at 8:15 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The forum will include remarks by SEC Commissioners and panel discussions that Commissioners may attend. Panel topics will include exempt and registered offerings occurring after the passage of the JOBS Act. Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the SEC GovernmentBusiness Forum on Small Business Capital Formation in open session, and determined that Commission business required consideration earlier than one week from today. No earlier notice of this Meeting was practicable. At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551–5400. Dated: November 13, 2015. Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–29502 Filed 11–16–15; 2:00 pm] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Sunshine Act Meeting Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 3:00 p.m., in the Auditorium, Room L– 002. The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be: • The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to Rule 3a1–1 and Regulation ATS and new Form ATS–N under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 related to certain alternative trading systems. Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the item listed for the Open Meeting in open session, and determined that Commission business required consideration earlier than one week from today. No earlier notice of this Meeting was practicable. At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted, or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551–5400. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Nov 17, 2015 Jkt 238001 Dated: November 13, 2015. Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–29501 Filed 11–16–15; 2:00 pm] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76431; File No. SR– NYSEArca–2015–104] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Policy Relating to Trade Reports for Exchange Traded Products November 12, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on October 28, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes a new policy relating to its treatment of trade reports for Exchange Traded Products that it determines to be inconsistent with the prevailing market. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 2 15 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Trades in Exchange Traded Products (‘‘ETP’’) 4 occasionally occur at prices that deviate significantly from prevailing market prices and/or an investment fund’s underlying value. These trades may be due to brief price dislocations caused, for example, by unusually large orders, momentary reductions in liquidity, or brief trading or pricing errors by individual market participants. The resulting trades may occasionally establish a high, a low or last sale price for a security that does not reflect price discovery in the fund holdings in a manner that is representative of ongoing trading in an ETP tracking the real-time value of the fund’s underlying securities, and could impact statistics for the investment fund as computed by third parties in a way that is inappropriately reflective of very short-term market impact rather than ongoing fund performance, leading to investor confusion. For example, trading and quoting in a particular ETF holding a basket of stocks reflecting the S&P 500 index might track that index with de minimis tracking error every minute throughout all trading days for five years, then suddenly trade 1% higher than the S&P 500 index on the close one day due to a large order that was erroneously entered by a single brokerdealer as a ‘‘Market’’ order rather than a ‘‘Market on Close’’ order, hence trading through multiple price levels in 4 For purposes of this filing, ETPs include Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs) and Exchange Traded Vehicles (ETVs). An ETF is an open-ended registered investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that has received certain exemptive relief from the SEC to allow secondary market trading in the ETF shares. ETFs are generally index-based products, in that each ETF holds a portfolio of securities that is intended to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the underlying benchmark index. An ETV tracks the underlying performance of an asset or index, allowing investors exposure to underlying assets such as futures contracts, commodities and currencies without actually trading futures or taking physical delivery of the underlying asset. An ETV is traded intraday like an ETF. An ETV is an open-ended trust or partnership unit that is registered under the Securities Act of 1933. An ETN is a senior unsecured debt obligation designed to track the total return of an underlying index, benchmark or strategy, minus investor fees. ETNs are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are redeemable to the issuer. In 2014, NYSE Arca’s listed ETPs had over $1.89 trillion in assets under management (AUM), representing over 90% of all U.S. listed Exchange Traded Products (ETPs). Additional information on ETPs is available on the Exchange’s Web site at https:// www.nyse.com/products/etp-funds-etf. E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM 18NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 2015 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES the book instantaneously rather than creating a disseminated imbalance that would attract normally-priced contrasided interest in a closing auction. If this trade results in a daily last sale for the ETF that materially differs from the fund’s NAV, an investor using a thirdparty Web site that utilizes trade data to compute tracking error statistics for the ETF could be misled into thinking that the ETF does not provide desired tracking performance to investors over time, when in fact the apparent poor tracking was due only to a single aberrant trade. While such events may occur randomly and on both sides of the market, because tracking error, for example, is measured as a mean squared deviation from NAV, both positive and negative divergence increase tracking error and therefore upside and downside deviations compound, rather than offset, over time. The Exchange currently has a policy to address such instances of ‘‘aberrant’’ trades for equity securities generally.5 The purpose of this proposed rule change is to adopt an additional policy to address instances of ‘‘aberrant’’ trades specific to ETPs traded on the Exchange. With certain exceptions that are specific to the trading of ETPs, the proposed rule change is identical to the policy previously adopted by the Exchange.6 The Exchange believes that the derivatively-priced nature of ETPs necessitates the use of a different, and generally broader, set of circumstances to determine that trades are ‘‘aberrant.’’ Unlike common stocks, the ‘‘fair value’’ and arbitrage pricing bands for an ETP are often known with a reasonably high degree of accuracy, since creation/ redemption baskets reflecting actual fund holdings are disclosed daily and are available to be exchanged for new ETP shares, or to be received for redeeming ETP shares, on a daily basis, along with the dissemination of constituent information and intraday pricing information such as Intraday Optimized Portfolio Values (‘‘IOPVs’’). As a result, it is often the case that smaller dislocations in ETP trade prices than in stock prices are manifestly not reflective of the trading pattern in the security. The Consolidated Tape Association (‘‘CTA’’) offers each Participant in the 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59937 (May 18, 2009), 74 FR 25291 (May 27, 2009) (SR– NYSEArca–2009–24). The NYSE Arca policy is substantially similar to policies adopted by other markets. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59064 (December 5, 2008), 73 FR 76082 (December 15, 2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–91); and 59151 (December 23, 2008), 74 FR 158 (January 2, 2009) (SR–NASDAQ–2008–100). 6 Id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Nov 17, 2015 Jkt 238001 CTA Plan the discretion to append an indicator to a trade report to indicate that the market believes that the price of a trade executed on that market does not accurately reflect the prevailing market for the security (an ‘‘Aberrant Report Indicator’’).7 During the course of monitoring by the Exchange or as a result of notification by another market, listed ETP issuer or market participant, the Exchange may become aware of ETP trade prices that do not accurately reflect the prevailing market for an ETP or an investment fund’s underlying value. In such a case, the Exchange proposes to apply a new policy pursuant to which it: (i) May determine to append an Aberrant Report Indicator to any trade report with respect to any ETP trade executed on the Exchange that the Exchange determines to be inconsistent with the prevailing market; and (ii) Would encourage vendors and other data recipients not to use prices of trades to which the Exchange has appended the Aberrant Trade Indicator in any calculation of the high, low or last sale price of an ETP. The Exchange would provide to data users an explanation of the parameters used in its aberrant trade policy and urge vendors to disclose the exclusion from high, low or last sale price data of any aberrant trades a vendor chooses to exclude from high, low or last sale price information it disseminates. Upon initial adoption of the Aberrant Report Indicator, the Exchange would also contact all of its listed ETP issuers to explain the aberrant trade policy and inform users of the information that trades appended with an Aberrant Report Indicator are still valid trades and not unwound as in the case of a clearly erroneous trade.8 In addition, the Exchange would inform an NYSE Arca listed ETP issuer each time the Exchange appends an Aberrant Report Indicator to a trade in such issuer’s listed ETP. While the CTA disseminates its own calculations of high, low and last sale prices, vendors and other data 7 The CTA recommends that data recipients should exclude the price of any trade to which the Aberrant Report Indicator has been appended from any calculation of the high, low or last sale prices for the security. 8 This proposed rule change would not impact a listed ETP issuer’s ability to seek cancellation of a transaction on the basis that it was ‘‘clearly erroneous’’ under Rule 7.10 (Clearly Erroneous Executions). In the event that a listed ETP issuer files for a transaction to be ‘‘clearly erroneous,’’ and the transaction is not cancelled, the Exchange reserves discretion to append an Aberrant Trade Indicator to the trade report to indicate that the market believes that the trade price in a trade executed on that market does not accurately reflect the prevailing market and/or value for an ETP. PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 72127 recipients—and not the Exchange— frequently determine their own, different methodology by which they wish to calculate high, low and last sale prices. Therefore, the Exchange would provide to vendors and data recipients an explanation of the parameters used in its aberrant trade policy and the potential deleterious effects that can result from including in the calculations a trade to which the Aberrant Report Indicator has been appended. In determining whether to append an Aberrant Report Indicator, the proposed Exchange policy would be as follows: 1. Absent exceptional circumstances, the Exchange will determine whether a trade price does not reflect the prevailing market for an ETP if the trade occurs at the greater of a minimum of 50 cents 9 or 50 basis points 10 away from a previous trade or valid ‘‘Reference Price’’. The Exchange believes that these are conservative values that are much larger than typical ETF arbitrage bounds, as evidenced for example by bid-ask spreads, and therefore should only be exceeded in cases where it may be appropriate to mark a given trade as aberrant, subject to the further conditions in (2) below. For example, the typical bid-ask spread in the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (‘‘EEM’’) and the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (‘‘VWO’’), which each hold many emerging-market stocks that may be lightly traded individually, are both only 3 basis points over the 45 trading days ending September 23, 2015, which included a particularly volatile period of trading.11 As a result, and based on feedback from ETF issuers, beyond this level the Exchange believes that issuer performance measurements may be adversely impacted in a manner not reflective of long-term fund performance. The ‘‘Reference Price’’ refers to (a) if the primary market for an ETP is open at the time of the trade, the national best bid or offer for the ETP, or (b) if the primary market for an ETP is not open at the time of the trade, the first executable quote or print for the ETP on the primary market after execution of the trade in question. However, if the circumstances suggest that a different Reference Price would be more appropriate, the Exchange will use the different Reference Price. For instance, 9 As proposed, the 50 cent threshold would be applicable when the trade price or Reference Price is $100 or below. 10 As proposed, the 50 basis point threshold would be applicable when the trade price or Reference Price is more than $100. 11 https://www.etf.com/EEM and https:// www.etf.com/VWO, each accessed September 24, 2015. E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM 18NON1 72128 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 2015 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES if the national best bid and offer for an ETP are so wide apart as to fail to reflect the market for an ETP, the Exchange might use as the Reference Price a trade price or best bid or offer that was available prior to the trade in question. 2. If the conditions in (1) above are met, the Exchange will determine whether to append an Aberrant Report Indicator upon consideration of all factors related to a trade, including the following: 12 • Index changes, reconstitutions and rebalances; • News released in the market where the ETP’s assets are primarily invested; • Changes in availability of ETP creations and/or redemptions; • Executions in other derivative instruments tracking the same underlying indices; • ETP issuer credit risk changes; • Whether the trade price represents a 52-week high or low for the ETP; • Whether the trade price reflects a share-split, reorganization or other corporate action; • System malfunctions or disruptions; • Validity of consolidated tape trades and quotes; • General market volatility of market conditions; • Historical volume and volatility for the ETP; • Material news released pertaining to the ETP; • Whether trading in the ETP was recently halted/resumed; • Trading bands, collars or circuit breakers; • A request from the ETP issuer, provided with documentation of a factual basis for believing that an execution is representative of market impact or trading issues outside of the issuer’s control, rather than true price discovery; and • Executions otherwise inconsistent with the trading pattern in the ETP. The Exchange would consider each of these factors with a view towards maintaining a fair and orderly market and the integrity of reported trade data. If the Exchange determines to append the Aberrant Report Indicator to a trade which represented the last sale of that ETP on the Exchange during a trading session, the Exchange may also 12 A majority of the factors listed are identical to factors the Exchange considers in determining whether or not to append an Aberrant Report Indicator to trades in equity securities under the current policy. The Exchange has listed additional factors that it will consider in determining whether or not to append an Aberrant Report Indicator because these factors are specific to trading in ETPs, such as Index change, reconstitutions and rebalances, changes in availability of ETP creations and/or redemptions. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Nov 17, 2015 Jkt 238001 determine to remove that trade’s designation as the last sale. The Exchange may do so either on the day of the trade or at a later date, so as to provide reasonable time for the Exchange to conduct due diligence regarding the trade, including the consideration of input from markets and other market participants. proposed change is not designed to address any competitive issue but rather to adopt a new policy that is similar to an existing policy to alert investors and other market participants that the Exchange believes that the trade price of an ETP executed on its market does not accurately reflect the prevailing market for the ETP. 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),13 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),14 in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. In particular, the Aberrant Report Indicator is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest in that the Exchange will seek to ensure a proper understanding of the Aberrant Report Indicator among securities market participants by: (i) Urging vendors to disclose the exclusion from high, low or last sale price data of any aberrant trades excluded from high, low or last sale price information they disseminate and to provide to data users an explanation of the parameters used in the Exchange’s aberrant trade policy; (ii) informing the affected listed ETP issuer each time the Exchange appends the Aberrant Report Indicator to a trade in an NYSE Arca listed ETP; and (iii) reminding the users of the information that these are still valid trades in that they were executed and not unwound as in the case of a clearly erroneous trade. The Exchange believes its proposal to append an Aberrant Report Indicator to certain trades is a reasonable means to alert investors and other market participants that the Exchange believes that the trade price of an ETP executed on its market does not accurately reflect the prevailing market for the ETP. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The 13 15 14 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or such longer time period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (a) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change; or (b) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an Email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NYSEArca–2015–104 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSEArca–2015–104. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM 18NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 2015 / Notices submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR– NYSEArca–2015–104 and should be submitted on or before December 9, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.15 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–29395 Filed 11–17–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76429; File No. SR– NYSEARCA–2015–109] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Discontinue the NYSE Arca Realtime Reference Price Market Data Product Offering asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES November 12, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on October 30, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The 15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C.78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 18:50 Nov 17, 2015 I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to discontinue the NYSE Arca Realtime Reference Price (‘‘NYSE Arca RRP’’) market data product offering. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose In 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) approved the NYSE Arca RRP market data product and certain fees for it.4 The NYSE Arca RRP market data product provides, on a real-time basis, last sale prices in all securities that trade on the Exchange. Currently, there are no subscribers to the NYSE Arca RRP market data product. Therefore, the Exchange has determined to discontinue the NYSE Arca RRP market data product. The Exchange also proposes to update the Fee Schedule to remove reference to the NYSE Arca RRP in connection with this change. The Exchange will announce the date that the NYSE Arca RRP will be decommissioned via an NYSE Market Data Notice. 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) 5 of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58444 (August 29, 2008), 73 FR 51872 (September 5, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2008–96). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 72129 Section 6(b)(5) 6 of the Act, in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, and it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination among customers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange believes that discontinuing NYSE Arca RRP and removing it from the Fee Schedule would remove impediments to and perfect a free and open market by streamlining the Exchange’s market data product offerings to include those for which there has been more demand and would provide vendors and subscribers with a simpler and more standardized suite of market data products. The proposal to discontinue NYSE Arca RRP is applicable to all members, issuers and other persons and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted self-regulatory organizations (‘‘SROs’’) and brokerdealers increased authority and flexibility to offer new and unique market data to consumers of such data. It was believed that this authority would expand the amount of data available to users and consumers of such data and also spur innovation and competition for the provision of market data. The Commission concluded that Regulation NMS—by lessening regulation of the market in proprietary data—would itself further the Act’s goals of facilitating efficiency and competition: [E]fficiency is promoted when brokerdealers who do not need the data beyond the prices, sizes, market center identifications of the NBBO and consolidated last sale information are not required to receive (and pay for) such data. The Commission also believes that efficiency is promoted when broker-dealers may choose to receive (and pay for) additional market data based on their own internal analysis of the need for such data.7 The Exchange believes that the discontinuation of a market data product for which there is little or no demand, as is the case with NYSE Arca RRP, is a direct example of efficiency because it acknowledges that investors 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005) (File No. S7–10–04). E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM 18NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 222 (Wednesday, November 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72126-72129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76431; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2015-104]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Policy Relating to Trade Reports 
for Exchange Traded Products

November 12, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on October 28, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes a new policy relating to its treatment of 
trade reports for Exchange Traded Products that it determines to be 
inconsistent with the prevailing market. The text of the proposed rule 
change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the 
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Trades in Exchange Traded Products (``ETP'') \4\ occasionally occur 
at prices that deviate significantly from prevailing market prices and/
or an investment fund's underlying value. These trades may be due to 
brief price dislocations caused, for example, by unusually large 
orders, momentary reductions in liquidity, or brief trading or pricing 
errors by individual market participants. The resulting trades may 
occasionally establish a high, a low or last sale price for a security 
that does not reflect price discovery in the fund holdings in a manner 
that is representative of ongoing trading in an ETP tracking the real-
time value of the fund's underlying securities, and could impact 
statistics for the investment fund as computed by third parties in a 
way that is inappropriately reflective of very short-term market impact 
rather than ongoing fund performance, leading to investor confusion. 
For example, trading and quoting in a particular ETF holding a basket 
of stocks reflecting the S&P 500 index might track that index with de 
minimis tracking error every minute throughout all trading days for 
five years, then suddenly trade 1% higher than the S&P 500 index on the 
close one day due to a large order that was erroneously entered by a 
single broker-dealer as a ``Market'' order rather than a ``Market on 
Close'' order, hence trading through multiple price levels in

[[Page 72127]]

the book instantaneously rather than creating a disseminated imbalance 
that would attract normally-priced contra-sided interest in a closing 
auction. If this trade results in a daily last sale for the ETF that 
materially differs from the fund's NAV, an investor using a third-party 
Web site that utilizes trade data to compute tracking error statistics 
for the ETF could be misled into thinking that the ETF does not provide 
desired tracking performance to investors over time, when in fact the 
apparent poor tracking was due only to a single aberrant trade. While 
such events may occur randomly and on both sides of the market, because 
tracking error, for example, is measured as a mean squared deviation 
from NAV, both positive and negative divergence increase tracking error 
and therefore upside and downside deviations compound, rather than 
offset, over time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ For purposes of this filing, ETPs include Exchange Traded 
Funds (ETFs), Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs) and Exchange Traded 
Vehicles (ETVs). An ETF is an open-ended registered investment 
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that has received 
certain exemptive relief from the SEC to allow secondary market 
trading in the ETF shares. ETFs are generally index-based products, 
in that each ETF holds a portfolio of securities that is intended to 
provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, generally 
correspond to the price and yield performance of the underlying 
benchmark index. An ETV tracks the underlying performance of an 
asset or index, allowing investors exposure to underlying assets 
such as futures contracts, commodities and currencies without 
actually trading futures or taking physical delivery of the 
underlying asset. An ETV is traded intraday like an ETF. An ETV is 
an open-ended trust or partnership unit that is registered under the 
Securities Act of 1933. An ETN is a senior unsecured debt obligation 
designed to track the total return of an underlying index, benchmark 
or strategy, minus investor fees. ETNs are registered under the 
Securities Act of 1933 and are redeemable to the issuer. In 2014, 
NYSE Arca's listed ETPs had over $1.89 trillion in assets under 
management (AUM), representing over 90% of all U.S. listed Exchange 
Traded Products (ETPs). Additional information on ETPs is available 
on the Exchange's Web site at https://www.nyse.com/products/etp-funds-etf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange currently has a policy to address such instances of 
``aberrant'' trades for equity securities generally.\5\ The purpose of 
this proposed rule change is to adopt an additional policy to address 
instances of ``aberrant'' trades specific to ETPs traded on the 
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59937 (May 18, 
2009), 74 FR 25291 (May 27, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-24). The NYSE 
Arca policy is substantially similar to policies adopted by other 
markets. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59064 (December 5, 
2008), 73 FR 76082 (December 15, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-91); and 59151 
(December 23, 2008), 74 FR 158 (January 2, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-
100).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With certain exceptions that are specific to the trading of ETPs, 
the proposed rule change is identical to the policy previously adopted 
by the Exchange.\6\ The Exchange believes that the derivatively-priced 
nature of ETPs necessitates the use of a different, and generally 
broader, set of circumstances to determine that trades are 
``aberrant.'' Unlike common stocks, the ``fair value'' and arbitrage 
pricing bands for an ETP are often known with a reasonably high degree 
of accuracy, since creation/redemption baskets reflecting actual fund 
holdings are disclosed daily and are available to be exchanged for new 
ETP shares, or to be received for redeeming ETP shares, on a daily 
basis, along with the dissemination of constituent information and 
intraday pricing information such as Intraday Optimized Portfolio 
Values (``IOPVs''). As a result, it is often the case that smaller 
dislocations in ETP trade prices than in stock prices are manifestly 
not reflective of the trading pattern in the security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA'') offers each Participant 
in the CTA Plan the discretion to append an indicator to a trade report 
to indicate that the market believes that the price of a trade executed 
on that market does not accurately reflect the prevailing market for 
the security (an ``Aberrant Report Indicator'').\7\ During the course 
of monitoring by the Exchange or as a result of notification by another 
market, listed ETP issuer or market participant, the Exchange may 
become aware of ETP trade prices that do not accurately reflect the 
prevailing market for an ETP or an investment fund's underlying value. 
In such a case, the Exchange proposes to apply a new policy pursuant to 
which it:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The CTA recommends that data recipients should exclude the 
price of any trade to which the Aberrant Report Indicator has been 
appended from any calculation of the high, low or last sale prices 
for the security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (i) May determine to append an Aberrant Report Indicator to any 
trade report with respect to any ETP trade executed on the Exchange 
that the Exchange determines to be inconsistent with the prevailing 
market; and
    (ii) Would encourage vendors and other data recipients not to use 
prices of trades to which the Exchange has appended the Aberrant Trade 
Indicator in any calculation of the high, low or last sale price of an 
ETP.
    The Exchange would provide to data users an explanation of the 
parameters used in its aberrant trade policy and urge vendors to 
disclose the exclusion from high, low or last sale price data of any 
aberrant trades a vendor chooses to exclude from high, low or last sale 
price information it disseminates. Upon initial adoption of the 
Aberrant Report Indicator, the Exchange would also contact all of its 
listed ETP issuers to explain the aberrant trade policy and inform 
users of the information that trades appended with an Aberrant Report 
Indicator are still valid trades and not unwound as in the case of a 
clearly erroneous trade.\8\ In addition, the Exchange would inform an 
NYSE Arca listed ETP issuer each time the Exchange appends an Aberrant 
Report Indicator to a trade in such issuer's listed ETP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ This proposed rule change would not impact a listed ETP 
issuer's ability to seek cancellation of a transaction on the basis 
that it was ``clearly erroneous'' under Rule 7.10 (Clearly Erroneous 
Executions). In the event that a listed ETP issuer files for a 
transaction to be ``clearly erroneous,'' and the transaction is not 
cancelled, the Exchange reserves discretion to append an Aberrant 
Trade Indicator to the trade report to indicate that the market 
believes that the trade price in a trade executed on that market 
does not accurately reflect the prevailing market and/or value for 
an ETP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the CTA disseminates its own calculations of high, low and 
last sale prices, vendors and other data recipients--and not the 
Exchange--frequently determine their own, different methodology by 
which they wish to calculate high, low and last sale prices. Therefore, 
the Exchange would provide to vendors and data recipients an 
explanation of the parameters used in its aberrant trade policy and the 
potential deleterious effects that can result from including in the 
calculations a trade to which the Aberrant Report Indicator has been 
appended.
    In determining whether to append an Aberrant Report Indicator, the 
proposed Exchange policy would be as follows:
    1. Absent exceptional circumstances, the Exchange will determine 
whether a trade price does not reflect the prevailing market for an ETP 
if the trade occurs at the greater of a minimum of 50 cents \9\ or 50 
basis points \10\ away from a previous trade or valid ``Reference 
Price''. The Exchange believes that these are conservative values that 
are much larger than typical ETF arbitrage bounds, as evidenced for 
example by bid-ask spreads, and therefore should only be exceeded in 
cases where it may be appropriate to mark a given trade as aberrant, 
subject to the further conditions in (2) below. For example, the 
typical bid-ask spread in the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 
(``EEM'') and the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (``VWO''), which 
each hold many emerging-market stocks that may be lightly traded 
individually, are both only 3 basis points over the 45 trading days 
ending September 23, 2015, which included a particularly volatile 
period of trading.\11\ As a result, and based on feedback from ETF 
issuers, beyond this level the Exchange believes that issuer 
performance measurements may be adversely impacted in a manner not 
reflective of long-term fund performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ As proposed, the 50 cent threshold would be applicable when 
the trade price or Reference Price is $100 or below.
    \10\ As proposed, the 50 basis point threshold would be 
applicable when the trade price or Reference Price is more than 
$100.
    \11\ https://www.etf.com/EEM and https://www.etf.com/VWO, each 
accessed September 24, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ``Reference Price'' refers to (a) if the primary market for an 
ETP is open at the time of the trade, the national best bid or offer 
for the ETP, or (b) if the primary market for an ETP is not open at the 
time of the trade, the first executable quote or print for the ETP on 
the primary market after execution of the trade in question. However, 
if the circumstances suggest that a different Reference Price would be 
more appropriate, the Exchange will use the different Reference Price. 
For instance,

[[Page 72128]]

if the national best bid and offer for an ETP are so wide apart as to 
fail to reflect the market for an ETP, the Exchange might use as the 
Reference Price a trade price or best bid or offer that was available 
prior to the trade in question.
    2. If the conditions in (1) above are met, the Exchange will 
determine whether to append an Aberrant Report Indicator upon 
consideration of all factors related to a trade, including the 
following: \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ A majority of the factors listed are identical to factors 
the Exchange considers in determining whether or not to append an 
Aberrant Report Indicator to trades in equity securities under the 
current policy. The Exchange has listed additional factors that it 
will consider in determining whether or not to append an Aberrant 
Report Indicator because these factors are specific to trading in 
ETPs, such as Index change, reconstitutions and rebalances, changes 
in availability of ETP creations and/or redemptions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Index changes, reconstitutions and rebalances;
     News released in the market where the ETP's assets are 
primarily invested;
     Changes in availability of ETP creations and/or 
redemptions;
     Executions in other derivative instruments tracking the 
same underlying indices;
     ETP issuer credit risk changes;
     Whether the trade price represents a 52-week high or low 
for the ETP;
     Whether the trade price reflects a share-split, 
reorganization or other corporate action;
     System malfunctions or disruptions;
     Validity of consolidated tape trades and quotes;
     General market volatility of market conditions;
     Historical volume and volatility for the ETP;
     Material news released pertaining to the ETP;
     Whether trading in the ETP was recently halted/resumed;
     Trading bands, collars or circuit breakers;
     A request from the ETP issuer, provided with documentation 
of a factual basis for believing that an execution is representative of 
market impact or trading issues outside of the issuer's control, rather 
than true price discovery; and
     Executions otherwise inconsistent with the trading pattern 
in the ETP.
    The Exchange would consider each of these factors with a view 
towards maintaining a fair and orderly market and the integrity of 
reported trade data. If the Exchange determines to append the Aberrant 
Report Indicator to a trade which represented the last sale of that ETP 
on the Exchange during a trading session, the Exchange may also 
determine to remove that trade's designation as the last sale. The 
Exchange may do so either on the day of the trade or at a later date, 
so as to provide reasonable time for the Exchange to conduct due 
diligence regarding the trade, including the consideration of input 
from markets and other market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\13\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\14\ in particular, because 
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the 
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Aberrant Report Indicator is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest in that the Exchange 
will seek to ensure a proper understanding of the Aberrant Report 
Indicator among securities market participants by: (i) Urging vendors 
to disclose the exclusion from high, low or last sale price data of any 
aberrant trades excluded from high, low or last sale price information 
they disseminate and to provide to data users an explanation of the 
parameters used in the Exchange's aberrant trade policy; (ii) informing 
the affected listed ETP issuer each time the Exchange appends the 
Aberrant Report Indicator to a trade in an NYSE Arca listed ETP; and 
(iii) reminding the users of the information that these are still valid 
trades in that they were executed and not unwound as in the case of a 
clearly erroneous trade.
    The Exchange believes its proposal to append an Aberrant Report 
Indicator to certain trades is a reasonable means to alert investors 
and other market participants that the Exchange believes that the trade 
price of an ETP executed on its market does not accurately reflect the 
prevailing market for the ETP.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not 
designed to address any competitive issue but rather to adopt a new 
policy that is similar to an existing policy to alert investors and 
other market participants that the Exchange believes that the trade 
price of an ETP executed on its market does not accurately reflect the 
prevailing market for the ETP.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or such longer time period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: 
(a) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change; or (b) 
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change 
should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an Email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-104 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-104. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the

[[Page 72129]]

submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with 
respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, 
and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change 
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be 
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit 
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-104 and should 
be submitted on or before December 9, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-29395 Filed 11-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.