Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination and Amended Final Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 70758-70759 [2015-29198]

Download as PDF 70758 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices Cara Lofaro, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5720. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–910] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination and Amended Final Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act Background Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 22, 2015, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT or Court) issued final judgment in Wheatland Tube Company v. United States, Consol. Court No. 12– 00296, affirming the Department of Commerce’s (the Department) final results of redetermination pursuant to court remand. Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department’s implemented final determination in a proceeding conducted under section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Section 129) related to the Department’s final affirmative determination in the antidumping duty (AD) investigation of circular welded carbon quality steel pipe (CWP) from the People’s Republic of China (the PRC) for the period October 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007.1 The Department is amending its implemented Final Section 129 Determination with regard to granting adjustments to the AD cash deposit rates. DATES: Effective Date: November 2, 2015 On July 22, 2008, the Department published AD and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on CWP imports from the PRC.2 The Government of the People’s Republic of China challenged the CWP orders and three other sets of simultaneously imposed AD and CVD orders before the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The WTO Appellate Body, in March 2011, found that the United States had acted inconsistently with its international obligations in several respects, including the potential imposition of overlapping remedies, or so-called ‘‘double remedies.’’ 3 The U.S. Trade Representative then announced the United States’ intention to comply with the WTO’s rulings and recommendations, and the Department initiated a Section 129 proceeding.4 On July 31, 2012, the Department issued its Final Section 129 Determination. In that determination, the Department found that an adjustment was warranted to the AD rates on CWP imports from the PRC to account for remedies that overlap those imposed by the CVD order.5 As a result, the Department reduced the applicable AD rate for separate rate companies from 69.2 percent to 45.35 percent and reduced the PRC-wide entity AD rate from 85.55 percent to 68.24 percent.6 The Department published a notice implementing the Final Section 129 Determination on August 30, 2012.7 Various parties challenged the Department’s Final Section 129 Determination at the CIT. Following the final disposition of litigation related to the Final Section 129 Determination regarding the CVD 1 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Final Determination: Section 129 Proceeding Pursuant to the WTO Appellate Body’s Findings in WTO DS379 Regarding the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations of Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s Republic of China,’’ (July 31, 2012) (Final Section 129 Determination); see also Implementation of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe; Laminated Woven Sacks; and Light- Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From the People’s Republic of China, 77 FR 52683 (August 30, 2012) (Implementation Notice). 2 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 42547 (July 22, 2008); see also Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Notice of Countervailing Duty Order, 73 FR 42545 (July 22, 2008) (collectively, CWP orders). 3 See United States—Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China, 611, WT/DS379/AB/R (Mar. 11, 2011). 4 See Implementation Notice. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 investigation of CWP from the PRC, in which the Department found no basis for making an adjustment to the companion AD rates under Section 777(A)(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),8 the CIT granted the Department’s request for a voluntary remand in the litigation challenging the Final Section 129 Determination regarding the AD investigation of CWP from the PRC.9 On October 8, 2015, the Department issued its Final Remand Redetermination regarding the AD investigation of CWP from the PRC, in which it amended its Final Section 129 Determination regarding the AD investigation and denied the adjustment to the AD cash deposit rates granted to respondents in the Final Section 129 Determination.10 On October 22, 2015, the CIT sustained the Department’s Final Remand Redetermination.11 Timken Notice In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Act, the Department must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s October 22, 2015, judgment affirming the Final Remand Redetermination constitutes a final court decision that is not in harmony with the Department’s Final Section 129 Determination. This notice is published in fulfillment of publication requirements of Timken. Amended Final Determination Because there is now a final court decision with respect to the Department’s Final Section 129 Determination regarding the AD investigation of CWP from the PRC, the Department is amending the Final Section 129 Determination, as implemented, regarding an adjustment to the AD cash deposit rates. The revised AD cash deposit rates are as follows: 5 See 6 See Final Section 129 Determination. Implementation Notice, 77 FR at 52687. 7 Id. 8 Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 12–00298, Slip Op. 15–44 (Ct. Int’l Trade May 7, 2015). 9 See Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, Court No. 12–00296 (August 3, 2015). 10 See ‘‘Final Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 12–00296,’’ (October 8, 2015) (Final Remand Redetermination). 11 See Wheatland Tube Company v. United States, Slip Op. 15–118, Consol. Court No. 12– 00296 (CIT October 22, 2015). E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices Revised AD cash deposit rate (percent) Exporter Producer BEIJING SAI LIN KE HARDWARE CO., LTD ............................ XUZHOU GUANG HUAN STEEL TUBE PRODUCTS CO., LTD. WUXI FASTUBE INDUSTRY CO., LTD .................................... JIANGSU GUOQIANG ZINC-PLATING INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD. WUXI ERIC STEEL PIPE CO., LTD ......................................... QINGDAO XIANGXING STEEL PIPE CO., LTD ...................... GUANGDONG WALSALL STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. GUANGDONG WALSALL STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. HENGSHUI JINGHUA STEEL PIPE CO., LTD ......................... ZHANGJIAGANG ZHONGYUAN PIPE-MAKING CO., LTD ..... WEIFANG EAST STEEL PIPE CO., LTD ................................. BAZHOU ZHUOFA STEEL PIPE CO. LTD ............................... TIANJIN JINGHAI COUNTY BAOLAI BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY CO. LTD. BAZHOU DONG SHENG HOT–DIPPED GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE CO., LTD. KUNSHAN LETS WIN STEEL MACHINERY CO., LTD ........... BAZHOU DONG SHENG HOT–DIPPED GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE CO., LTD. DALIAN BROLLO STEEL TUBES LTD ..................................... BENXI NORTHERN PIPES CO., LTD ...................................... BENXI NORTHERN PIPES CO., LTD ...................................... WUXI FASTUBE INDUSTRY CO., LTD ..................................... JIANGSU GUOQIANG ZINC-PLATING INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD. WUXI ERIC STEEL PIPE CO., LTD .......................................... QINGDAO XIANGXING STEEL PIPE CO., LTD ....................... WAH CIT ENTERPRISES .......................................................... GUANGDONG WALSALL STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD HENGSHUI JINGHUA STEEL PIPE CO., LTD .......................... ZHANGJIAGANG ZHONGYUAN PIPE-MAKING CO., LTD ...... WEIFANG EAST STEEL PIPE CO., LTD .................................. SHIJIAZHUANG ZHONGQING IMP & EXP CO., LTD .............. TIANJIN BAOLAI INT’L TRADE CO., LTD ................................. WAI MING (TIANJIN) INT’L TRADING CO., LTD ...................... KUNSHAN LETS WIN STEEL MACHINERY CO., LTD ............ SHENYANG BOYU M/E CO., LTD ............................................ DALIAN BROLLO STEEL TUBES LTD ...................................... BENXI NORTHERN PIPES CO., LTD ....................................... SHANGHAI METALS & MINERALS IMPORT & EXPORT CORP. HULUDAO STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD ..................... TIANJIN XINGYUDA IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD .......... TIANJIN XINGYUDA IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD .......... TIANJIN XINGYUDA IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD .......... TIANJIN XINGYUDA IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD .......... tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES JIANGYIN JIANYE METAL PRODUCTS CO., LTD ................... RIZHAO XINGYE IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD ..................... TIANJIN NO. 1 STEEL ROLLED CO., LTD ............................... TIANJIN NO. 1 STEEL ROLLED CO., LTD ............................... TIANJIN NO. 1 STEEL ROLLED CO., LTD ............................... KUNSHAN HONGYUAN MACHINERY MANUFACTURE CO., LTD. QINGDAO YONGJIE IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD ............... PRC-WIDE ENTITY .................................................................... Unless the applicable cash deposit rates have been superseded by cash deposit rates calculated in an intervening administrative review of the AD order on CWP from the PRC, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to require a cash deposit for estimated AD duties at the rate noted above for each specified exporter and producer combination, for entries of subject merchandise, entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after November 2, 2015. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and section 129(c)(2)(A) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. HULUDAO STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD .................... TIANJIN LIFENGYUANDA STEEL GROUP CO. LTD .............. TIANJIN XINGYUNDA STEEL PIPE CO., LTD ........................ TIANJIN LITUO STEEL PRODUCTS CO., LTD ....................... TANGSHAN FENGNAN DISTRICT XINLIDA STEEL PIPE CO., LTD. JIANGYIN JIANYE METAL PRODUCTS CO., LTD .................. SHANDONG XINYUAN GROUP CO., LTD .............................. TIANJIN HEXING STEEL CO., LTD ......................................... TIANJIN RUITONG STEEL CO., LTD ....................................... TIANJIN YAYI INDUSTRIAL CO ............................................... KUNSHAN HONGYUAN MACHINERY MANUFACTURE CO., LTD. SHANDONG XINYUANGROUP CO., LTD ............................... .................................................................................................... Dated: November 5, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–29198 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XC554 Marine Mammals; File No. 17952 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit amendment. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a major amendment to Permit No. 17952– SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70759 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 69.2 85.55 01 has been issued to Daniel P. Costa, Ph.D., Department of Biology and Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. ADDRESSES: The permit amendment and related documents are available for review upon written request or by appointment in the Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone (301) 427– 8401; fax (301) 713–0376. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ´ Amy Sloan or Rosa L. Gonzalez, (301) 427–8401. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 17, 2015, notice was published in the Federal Register (80 FR 49210) that a request for an amendment to Permit No. 17952–01 to conduct research on California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) had been submitted by the above-named applicant. The E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 220 (Monday, November 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70758-70759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29198]



[[Page 70758]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-910]


Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe From the People's 
Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final 
Determination and Amended Final Determination Under Section 129 of the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On October 22, 2015, the United States Court of International 
Trade (CIT or Court) issued final judgment in Wheatland Tube Company v. 
United States, Consol. Court No. 12-00296, affirming the Department of 
Commerce's (the Department) final results of redetermination pursuant 
to court remand. Consistent with the decision of the United States 
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United 
States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 
2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the Department is notifying the public that 
the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department's 
implemented final determination in a proceeding conducted under section 
129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Section 129) related to the 
Department's final affirmative determination in the antidumping duty 
(AD) investigation of circular welded carbon quality steel pipe (CWP) 
from the People's Republic of China (the PRC) for the period October 1, 
2006, through March 31, 2007.\1\ The Department is amending its 
implemented Final Section 129 Determination with regard to granting 
adjustments to the AD cash deposit rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations, ``Final Determination: Section 129 Proceeding 
Pursuant to the WTO Appellate Body's Findings in WTO DS379 Regarding 
the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations of Circular 
Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People's Republic of 
China,'' (July 31, 2012) (Final Section 129 Determination); see also 
Implementation of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay 
Round Agreements Act: Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; 
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe; Laminated Woven Sacks; 
and Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From the People's 
Republic of China, 77 FR 52683 (August 30, 2012) (Implementation 
Notice).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: November 2, 2015

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cara Lofaro, Office IV, Enforcement 
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-5720.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 22, 2008, the Department published AD and countervailing 
duty (CVD) orders on CWP imports from the PRC.\2\ The Government of the 
People's Republic of China challenged the CWP orders and three other 
sets of simultaneously imposed AD and CVD orders before the Dispute 
Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The WTO 
Appellate Body, in March 2011, found that the United States had acted 
inconsistently with its international obligations in several respects, 
including the potential imposition of overlapping remedies, or so-
called ``double remedies.'' \3\ The U.S. Trade Representative then 
announced the United States' intention to comply with the WTO's rulings 
and recommendations, and the Department initiated a Section 129 
proceeding.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Carbon 
Quality Steel Pipe from the People's Republic of China, 73 FR 42547 
(July 22, 2008); see also Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe 
from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final 
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Notice of 
Countervailing Duty Order, 73 FR 42545 (July 22, 2008) 
(collectively, CWP orders).
    \3\ See United States--Definitive Anti-Dumping and 
Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China, 611, WT/DS379/
AB/R (Mar. 11, 2011).
    \4\ See Implementation Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 31, 2012, the Department issued its Final Section 129 
Determination. In that determination, the Department found that an 
adjustment was warranted to the AD rates on CWP imports from the PRC to 
account for remedies that overlap those imposed by the CVD order.\5\ As 
a result, the Department reduced the applicable AD rate for separate 
rate companies from 69.2 percent to 45.35 percent and reduced the PRC-
wide entity AD rate from 85.55 percent to 68.24 percent.\6\ The 
Department published a notice implementing the Final Section 129 
Determination on August 30, 2012.\7\ Various parties challenged the 
Department's Final Section 129 Determination at the CIT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Final Section 129 Determination.
    \6\ See Implementation Notice, 77 FR at 52687.
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following the final disposition of litigation related to the Final 
Section 129 Determination regarding the CVD investigation of CWP from 
the PRC, in which the Department found no basis for making an 
adjustment to the companion AD rates under Section 777(A)(f) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),\8\ the CIT granted the 
Department's request for a voluntary remand in the litigation 
challenging the Final Section 129 Determination regarding the AD 
investigation of CWP from the PRC.\9\ On October 8, 2015, the 
Department issued its Final Remand Redetermination regarding the AD 
investigation of CWP from the PRC, in which it amended its Final 
Section 129 Determination regarding the AD investigation and denied the 
adjustment to the AD cash deposit rates granted to respondents in the 
Final Section 129 Determination.\10\ On October 22, 2015, the CIT 
sustained the Department's Final Remand Redetermination.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 12-
00298, Slip Op. 15-44 (Ct. Int'l Trade May 7, 2015).
    \9\ See Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, Court No. 12-00296 
(August 3, 2015).
    \10\ See ``Final Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, 
Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 12-00296,'' 
(October 8, 2015) (Final Remand Redetermination).
    \11\ See Wheatland Tube Company v. United States, Slip Op. 15-
118, Consol. Court No. 12-00296 (CIT October 22, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades, the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Act, 
the Department must publish a notice of a court decision that is not 
``in harmony'' with a Department determination and must suspend 
liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The 
CIT's October 22, 2015, judgment affirming the Final Remand 
Redetermination constitutes a final court decision that is not in 
harmony with the Department's Final Section 129 Determination. This 
notice is published in fulfillment of publication requirements of 
Timken.

Amended Final Determination

    Because there is now a final court decision with respect to the 
Department's Final Section 129 Determination regarding the AD 
investigation of CWP from the PRC, the Department is amending the Final 
Section 129 Determination, as implemented, regarding an adjustment to 
the AD cash deposit rates. The revised AD cash deposit rates are as 
follows:

[[Page 70759]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Revised AD
            Exporter                     Producer          cash deposit
                                                          rate (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BEIJING SAI LIN KE HARDWARE      XUZHOU GUANG HUAN STEEL            69.2
 CO., LTD.                        TUBE PRODUCTS CO., LTD.
WUXI FASTUBE INDUSTRY CO., LTD.  WUXI FASTUBE INDUSTRY              69.2
                                  CO., LTD.
JIANGSU GUOQIANG ZINC-PLATING    JIANGSU GUOQIANG ZINC-             69.2
 INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD.         PLATING INDUSTRIAL
                                  COMPANY, LTD.
WUXI ERIC STEEL PIPE CO., LTD..  WUXI ERIC STEEL PIPE               69.2
                                  CO., LTD.
QINGDAO XIANGXING STEEL PIPE     QINGDAO XIANGXING STEEL            69.2
 CO., LTD.                        PIPE CO., LTD.
WAH CIT ENTERPRISES............  GUANGDONG WALSALL STEEL            69.2
                                  PIPE INDUSTRIAL CO.
                                  LTD.
GUANGDONG WALSALL STEEL PIPE     GUANGDONG WALSALL STEEL            69.2
 INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD.              PIPE INDUSTRIAL CO.
                                  LTD.
HENGSHUI JINGHUA STEEL PIPE      HENGSHUI JINGHUA STEEL             69.2
 CO., LTD.                        PIPE CO., LTD.
ZHANGJIAGANG ZHONGYUAN PIPE-     ZHANGJIAGANG ZHONGYUAN             69.2
 MAKING CO., LTD.                 PIPE-MAKING CO., LTD.
WEIFANG EAST STEEL PIPE CO.,     WEIFANG EAST STEEL PIPE            69.2
 LTD.                             CO., LTD.
SHIJIAZHUANG ZHONGQING IMP &     BAZHOU ZHUOFA STEEL                69.2
 EXP CO., LTD.                    PIPE CO. LTD.
TIANJIN BAOLAI INT'L TRADE CO.,  TIANJIN JINGHAI COUNTY             69.2
 LTD.                             BAOLAI BUSINESS AND
                                  INDUSTRY CO. LTD.
WAI MING (TIANJIN) INT'L         BAZHOU DONG SHENG HOT-             69.2
 TRADING CO., LTD.                DIPPED GALVANIZED
                                  STEEL PIPE CO., LTD.
KUNSHAN LETS WIN STEEL           KUNSHAN LETS WIN STEEL             69.2
 MACHINERY CO., LTD.              MACHINERY CO., LTD.
SHENYANG BOYU M/E CO., LTD.....  BAZHOU DONG SHENG HOT-             69.2
                                  DIPPED GALVANIZED
                                  STEEL PIPE CO., LTD.
DALIAN BROLLO STEEL TUBES LTD..  DALIAN BROLLO STEEL                69.2
                                  TUBES LTD.
BENXI NORTHERN PIPES CO., LTD..  BENXI NORTHERN PIPES               69.2
                                  CO., LTD.
SHANGHAI METALS & MINERALS       BENXI NORTHERN PIPES               69.2
 IMPORT & EXPORT CORP.            CO., LTD.
HULUDAO STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIAL    HULUDAO STEEL PIPE                 69.2
 CO., LTD.                        INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
TIANJIN XINGYUDA IMPORT AND      TIANJIN LIFENGYUANDA               69.2
 EXPORT CO., LTD.                 STEEL GROUP CO. LTD.
TIANJIN XINGYUDA IMPORT AND      TIANJIN XINGYUNDA STEEL            69.2
 EXPORT CO., LTD.                 PIPE CO., LTD.
TIANJIN XINGYUDA IMPORT AND      TIANJIN LITUO STEEL                69.2
 EXPORT CO., LTD.                 PRODUCTS CO., LTD.
TIANJIN XINGYUDA IMPORT AND      TANGSHAN FENGNAN                   69.2
 EXPORT CO., LTD.                 DISTRICT XINLIDA STEEL
                                  PIPE CO., LTD.
JIANGYIN JIANYE METAL PRODUCTS   JIANGYIN JIANYE METAL              69.2
 CO., LTD.                        PRODUCTS CO., LTD.
RIZHAO XINGYE IMPORT & EXPORT    SHANDONG XINYUAN GROUP             69.2
 CO., LTD.                        CO., LTD.
TIANJIN NO. 1 STEEL ROLLED CO.,  TIANJIN HEXING STEEL               69.2
 LTD.                             CO., LTD.
TIANJIN NO. 1 STEEL ROLLED CO.,  TIANJIN RUITONG STEEL              69.2
 LTD.                             CO., LTD.
TIANJIN NO. 1 STEEL ROLLED CO.,  TIANJIN YAYI INDUSTRIAL            69.2
 LTD.                             CO.
KUNSHAN HONGYUAN MACHINERY       KUNSHAN HONGYUAN                   69.2
 MANUFACTURE CO., LTD.            MACHINERY MANUFACTURE
                                  CO., LTD.
QINGDAO YONGJIE IMPORT & EXPORT  SHANDONG XINYUANGROUP              69.2
 CO., LTD.                        CO., LTD.
PRC-WIDE ENTITY................  .......................           85.55
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unless the applicable cash deposit rates have been superseded by 
cash deposit rates calculated in an intervening administrative review 
of the AD order on CWP from the PRC, the Department will instruct U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection to require a cash deposit for estimated 
AD duties at the rate noted above for each specified exporter and 
producer combination, for entries of subject merchandise, entered or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after November 2, 
2015.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and section 129(c)(2)(A) of the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act.

    Dated: November 5, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-29198 Filed 11-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.