Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013-2014, 69942-69944 [2015-28757]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
69942
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices
Dated: November 4, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this administrative review but
covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding;
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the
original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of the
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 3.76
percent, the all-others rate established
in the antidumping investigation.7
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
[A–570–918]
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
7 See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube
from Mexico, the People's Republic of China, and
the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders;
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the
Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73
FR 45403, 45404 (August 5, 2008).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Nov 10, 2015
Jkt 238001
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the
Final Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Issues
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments
Comment 1: Discounts Granted on HomeMarket Sales
Comment 2: The Proper Universe of Sales
Comment 3: Certain Home-Market Insurance
Expenses
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–28752 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 15, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the Preliminary
Results of the sixth administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on steel wire garment hangers from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1
We invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. Based on our
analysis of the comments and
information received, we made no
changes to the final margin calculations
of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Shanghai Wells’’).2 We continue to
AGENCY:
1 See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013±
2014, 80 FR 41480 (July 15, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’).
2 The Department previously found that Shanghai
Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (‘‘HK
Wells’’) and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (USA) (‘‘Wells
USA’’) are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells
Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single
entity (collectively, ‘‘Shanghai Wells’’). Because
there were no changes in this review to the facts
that supported that decision, we continue to find
Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are
affiliated and that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells
comprise a single entity. See Steel Wire Garment
Hangers From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in
Part, of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761 (November 9, 2010),
unchanged in First Administrative Review of Steel
Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic
of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
find Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Industry
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo Dasheng’’) is not
eligible for separate rate status and,
therefore, is part of the PRC-wide entity.
Listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the
Administrative Review’’ section of this
notice are the final dumping margins.
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is October
1, 2013, through September 30, 2014.
DATES: Effective Date: November 12,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexis Polovina, Alexander Komisar, or
Kathleen Marksberry, AD/CVD
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3927, (202) 482–
7425, or (202) 482–7906, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the
Preliminary Results on July 15, 2015. On
August 24, 2015, M&B Metal Products
Inc., (‘‘Petitioner’’), U.S. Distributors,3
Aristocraft of America LLC
(‘‘Aristocraft’’), and Ningbo Dasheng
submitted case briefs. On September 1,
2015, Petitioner submitted a rebuttal
brief. On September 9, 2015, the
Department held a public hearing where
counsel for Petitioner, U.S. Distributors,
and Aristocraft, presented issues raised
in their case and rebuttal briefs.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise that is subject to the
order is steel wire garment hangers. The
products subject to the order are
currently classified under U.S.
Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTSUS’’)
subheadings 7326.20.0020,
7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise remains dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum,4 which is hereby
adopted by this notice.
3 FabriClean Supply Inc., Best For Less Dry
Cleaners Supply LLC, Ideal Chemical & Supply
Company, Laundry & Cleaners Supply Inc., Rocky
Mountain Hanger MFG Co., Rosenberg Supply Co.,
Ltd, and ZTN Management Company, LLC,
(collectively, ‘‘U.S. Distributors’’). The U.S.
Distributors include importers of subject
merchandise and a wholesaler of domestic like
product.
4 See the Department’s Memorandum, titled
‘‘Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the People’s
Republic of China: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Sixth
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’).
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by interested parties in
this review are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.5 A list of
the issues which parties raised is
attached to this notice as an Appendix.
The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://
www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The
signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
PRC-Wide Entity
Shaoxing Dingli and the Shaoxing
Entity 6 failed to respond to the
Department’s requests for information.7
These companies, therefore, are not
eligible for separate rate status.8
Additionally, Ningbo Dasheng failed to
adequately respond to all parts of the
questionnaire, and therefore, is also not
eligible for a separate rate.9
Accordingly, the Department finds that
the PRC-wide entity includes these
companies.
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
Regarding the administrative review,
the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period
October 1, 2013, through September 30,
2014:
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Exporter
Shanghai Wells Hanger Co.,
Ltd.10 .......................................
33.24
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5 Id.
6 We selected two companies for individual
examination, however, these two companies failed
to respond. These companies are: 1) Shaoxing
Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd., (‘‘Shaoxing
Dingli’’); and 2) Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal
Manufacture (collectively, ‘‘the Shaoxing Entity’’).
7 See Preliminary Results, at ‘‘Respondent
Selection’’ section.
8 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
70850, 70851 (November 28, 2014).
9 See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at
Comment 1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Nov 10, 2015
Jkt 238001
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of these final results
of review.
Where the respondent reported
reliable entered values, we calculated
importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem rates by aggregating the
dumping margins calculated for all U.S.
sales to each importer (or customer) and
dividing this amount by the total
entered value of the sales to each
importer (or customer).11 Where the
Department calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin by dividing the
total amount of dumping for reviewed
sales to that party by the total sales
quantity associated with those
transactions, the Department will direct
CBP to assess importer-specific
assessment rates based on the resulting
per-unit rates.12 Where an importer- (or
customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is greater than de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to collect
the appropriate duties at the time of
liquidation.13 Where an importer- (or
customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.14
The Department announced a
refinement to its assessment practice in
NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement
in practice, for entries that were not
reported in the U.S. sales databases
submitted by companies individually
examined during this review, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide
rate. Additionally, if the Department
determines that an exporter had no
shipments of the subject merchandise,
any suspended entries that entered
under that exporter’s case number (i.e.,
10 This rate applies to the single entity comprised
of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., and Hong Kong
Wells Ltd.
11 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
12 Id.
13 Id.
14 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69943
at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated
at the PRC-wide rate.15
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act: (1) For the companies listed
above, the cash deposit rate will be
established in the final results of these
reviews (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, then zero cash deposit will be
required); (2) for previously investigated
or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that received a separate
rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate
of 187.25 percent; and (4) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not received their own rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. We request a timely written
notification of the return or destruction
15 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
69944
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject
to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
administrative review and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: November 5, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—Issues and Decision
Memorandum
List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision
Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: PRC-wide Treatment for Ningbo
Dasheng
Comment 2: Selection of Financial
Statements
Comment 3: Whether to Adjust U.S Prices for
Un-refunded Value-Added Tax (‘‘VAT’’)
Comment 4: Whether the Thai AUV for
Corrugated Paper Is Aberrational
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should
Revise the Surrogate Value for Brokerage
and Handling (‘‘B&H’’)
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–28757 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–838]
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and
Tube From Mexico: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 10, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on seamless
refined copper pipe and tube from
Mexico.1 The review covers one
producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise, GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de
C.V. (Golden Dragon).2 The period of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013±2014, 80 FR
47908 (August 10, 2015) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 The Department previously treated GD Affiliates
S. de R.L. de C.V. as part of a single entity
including: (1) GD Copper Cooperatief U.A.; (2) Hong
Kong GD Trading Co. Ltd.; (3) Golden Dragon
18:15 Nov 10, 2015
Jkt 238001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise,
Golden Dragon. On August 10, 2015, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on seamless
refined copper pipe and tube from
Mexico.
We invited parties to comment on the
preliminary results of the review. No
interested party submitted comments.
The Department conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
review (POR) is November 1, 2013,
through October 31, 2014.
No interested party submitted
comments on the preliminary results.
We made no changes to the margin
calculation for the final results of this
review. Therefore, the final results do
not differ from the preliminary results.
The final weighted-average dumping
margin for Golden Dragon is listed
below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’
section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3874 or (202) 482–5973,
respectively.
The merchandise subject to the order 3
is seamless refined copper pipe and
tube. The product is currently classified
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 7407.10.1500,
7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and
8415.90.8085. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
product description, available in the
Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.; (4) GD
Copper U.S.A. Inc.; (5) GD Affiliates Servicios S. de
R.L. de C.V.; and (6) GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V.,
which is collectively referred to as Golden Dragon.
See, e.g., Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review, 77 FR 59178 (September 26,
2012), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
3 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
From Mexico and the People's Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
From Mexico, 75 FR 71070 (November 22, 2010)
(Amended Final and Order).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Preliminary Decision Memorandum,4
remains dispositive.
Final Results of the Review
We determine that a weighted-average
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists
for entries of subject merchandise that
were produced and/or exported by GD
Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V. and that
entered, or were withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption during the
POR.
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to
the Final Modification for Reviews,5
because the weighted-average dumping
margins for Golden Dragon is zero, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.6
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Golden
Dragon for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.7
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 41 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review, pursuant to 19
CFR 356.8(a).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of these final results for all
shipments of seamless refined copper
pipe and tube from Mexico entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date as provided by section 751(a)(2) of
the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for
Golden Dragon will be 0.00 percent, the
weighted average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this review
but covered in a completed prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
4 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4.
5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
6 Id. at 8102.
7 For a full discussion, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69942-69944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28757]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-918]
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013-2014
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 15, 2015, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published the Preliminary Results of the sixth
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel wire
garment hangers from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ We
invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our
analysis of the comments and information received, we made no changes
to the final margin calculations of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.
(``Shanghai Wells'').\2\ We continue to find Ningbo Dasheng Hanger
Industry Co., Ltd. (``Ningbo Dasheng'') is not eligible for separate
rate status and, therefore, is part of the PRC-wide entity. Listed
below in the ``Final Results of the Administrative Review'' section of
this notice are the final dumping margins. The period of review
(``POR'') is October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 41480 (July 15, 2015) (``Preliminary
Results'').
\2\ The Department previously found that Shanghai Wells Hanger
Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (``HK Wells'') and Hong Kong Wells
Ltd. (USA) (``Wells USA'') are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells
Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single entity
(collectively, ``Shanghai Wells''). Because there were no changes in
this review to the facts that supported that decision, we continue
to find Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are affiliated and
that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells comprise a single entity. See Steel
Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the
First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761
(November 9, 2010), unchanged in First Administrative Review of
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: November 12, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, Alexander Komisar, or
Kathleen Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce,
14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482-3927, (202) 482-7425, or (202) 482-7906,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the Preliminary Results on July 15, 2015.
On August 24, 2015, M&B Metal Products Inc., (``Petitioner''), U.S.
Distributors,\3\ Aristocraft of America LLC (``Aristocraft''), and
Ningbo Dasheng submitted case briefs. On September 1, 2015, Petitioner
submitted a rebuttal brief. On September 9, 2015, the Department held a
public hearing where counsel for Petitioner, U.S. Distributors, and
Aristocraft, presented issues raised in their case and rebuttal briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ FabriClean Supply Inc., Best For Less Dry Cleaners Supply
LLC, Ideal Chemical & Supply Company, Laundry & Cleaners Supply
Inc., Rocky Mountain Hanger MFG Co., Rosenberg Supply Co., Ltd, and
ZTN Management Company, LLC, (collectively, ``U.S. Distributors'').
The U.S. Distributors include importers of subject merchandise and a
wholesaler of domestic like product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise that is subject to the order is steel wire garment
hangers. The products subject to the order are currently classified
under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (``HTSUS'') subheadings
7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise remains dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum,\4\ which is hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See the Department's Memorandum, titled ``Steel Wire Garment
Hangers from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Sixth Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,'' dated concurrently with this notice
(``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 69943]]
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested
parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\5\ A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to
this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The
signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity
Shaoxing Dingli and the Shaoxing Entity \6\ failed to respond to
the Department's requests for information.\7\ These companies,
therefore, are not eligible for separate rate status.\8\ Additionally,
Ningbo Dasheng failed to adequately respond to all parts of the
questionnaire, and therefore, is also not eligible for a separate
rate.\9\ Accordingly, the Department finds that the PRC-wide entity
includes these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ We selected two companies for individual examination,
however, these two companies failed to respond. These companies are:
1) Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd., (``Shaoxing
Dingli''); and 2) Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufacture (collectively,
``the Shaoxing Entity'').
\7\ See Preliminary Results, at ``Respondent Selection''
section.
\8\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 70850, 70851 (November 28, 2014).
\9\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comment 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Administrative Review
Regarding the administrative review, the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period October 1, 2013, through September
30, 2014:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.\10\........................ 33.24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ This rate applies to the single entity comprised of
Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., and Hong Kong Wells Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with
the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of
these final results of review.
Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we
calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by
aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each
importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered
value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\11\ Where the
Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the
total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total
sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will
direct CBP to assess importer-specific assessment rates based on the
resulting per-unit rates.\12\ Where an importer- (or customer-)
specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the
time of liquidation.\13\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\12\ Id.
\13\ Id.
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in
NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that
were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies
individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if
the Department determines that an exporter had no shipments of the
subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that
exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above,
the cash deposit rate will be established in the final results of these
reviews (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash
deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed
PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate
rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent
period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not
been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be the PRC-wide rate of 187.25 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. We request a timely written notification of the return or
destruction
[[Page 69944]]
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: November 5, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum
List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: PRC-wide Treatment for Ningbo Dasheng
Comment 2: Selection of Financial Statements
Comment 3: Whether to Adjust U.S Prices for Un-refunded Value-Added
Tax (``VAT'')
Comment 4: Whether the Thai AUV for Corrugated Paper Is Aberrational
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Revise the Surrogate Value
for Brokerage and Handling (``B&H'')
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-28757 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
