Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013-2014, 69942-69944 [2015-28757]

Download as PDF 69942 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices Dated: November 4, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 3.76 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation.7 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. [A–570–918] Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). 7 See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico, the People's Republic of China, and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 45403, 45404 (August 5, 2008). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Issues III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments Comment 1: Discounts Granted on HomeMarket Sales Comment 2: The Proper Universe of Sales Comment 3: Certain Home-Market Insurance Expenses VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–28752 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013–2014 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On July 15, 2015, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published the Preliminary Results of the sixth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel wire garment hangers from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments and information received, we made no changes to the final margin calculations of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Wells’’).2 We continue to AGENCY: 1 See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013± 2014, 80 FR 41480 (July 15, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 The Department previously found that Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (‘‘HK Wells’’) and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (USA) (‘‘Wells USA’’) are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single entity (collectively, ‘‘Shanghai Wells’’). Because there were no changes in this review to the facts that supported that decision, we continue to find Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells comprise a single entity. See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761 (November 9, 2010), unchanged in First Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011). PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 find Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo Dasheng’’) is not eligible for separate rate status and, therefore, is part of the PRC-wide entity. Listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative Review’’ section of this notice are the final dumping margins. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014. DATES: Effective Date: November 12, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, Alexander Komisar, or Kathleen Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3927, (202) 482– 7425, or (202) 482–7906, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department published the Preliminary Results on July 15, 2015. On August 24, 2015, M&B Metal Products Inc., (‘‘Petitioner’’), U.S. Distributors,3 Aristocraft of America LLC (‘‘Aristocraft’’), and Ningbo Dasheng submitted case briefs. On September 1, 2015, Petitioner submitted a rebuttal brief. On September 9, 2015, the Department held a public hearing where counsel for Petitioner, U.S. Distributors, and Aristocraft, presented issues raised in their case and rebuttal briefs. Scope of the Order The merchandise that is subject to the order is steel wire garment hangers. The products subject to the order are currently classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise remains dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,4 which is hereby adopted by this notice. 3 FabriClean Supply Inc., Best For Less Dry Cleaners Supply LLC, Ideal Chemical & Supply Company, Laundry & Cleaners Supply Inc., Rocky Mountain Hanger MFG Co., Rosenberg Supply Co., Ltd, and ZTN Management Company, LLC, (collectively, ‘‘U.S. Distributors’’). The U.S. Distributors include importers of subject merchandise and a wholesaler of domestic like product. 4 See the Department’s Memorandum, titled ‘‘Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Sixth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’). E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. PRC-Wide Entity Shaoxing Dingli and the Shaoxing Entity 6 failed to respond to the Department’s requests for information.7 These companies, therefore, are not eligible for separate rate status.8 Additionally, Ningbo Dasheng failed to adequately respond to all parts of the questionnaire, and therefore, is also not eligible for a separate rate.9 Accordingly, the Department finds that the PRC-wide entity includes these companies. Final Results of the Administrative Review Regarding the administrative review, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014: Weightedaverage margin (percent) Exporter Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.10 ....................................... 33.24 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 5 Id. 6 We selected two companies for individual examination, however, these two companies failed to respond. These companies are: 1) Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd., (‘‘Shaoxing Dingli’’); and 2) Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufacture (collectively, ‘‘the Shaoxing Entity’’). 7 See Preliminary Results, at ‘‘Respondent Selection’’ section. 8 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 70850, 70851 (November 28, 2014). 9 See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comment 1. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to each importer (or customer).11 Where the Department calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will direct CBP to assess importer-specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit rates.12 Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.13 Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.14 The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter’s case number (i.e., 10 This rate applies to the single entity comprised of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. 11 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 12 Id. 13 Id. 14 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 69943 at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.15 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above, the cash deposit rate will be established in the final results of these reviews (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 187.25 percent; and (4) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. We request a timely written notification of the return or destruction 15 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1 69944 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: November 5, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—Issues and Decision Memorandum List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: PRC-wide Treatment for Ningbo Dasheng Comment 2: Selection of Financial Statements Comment 3: Whether to Adjust U.S Prices for Un-refunded Value-Added Tax (‘‘VAT’’) Comment 4: Whether the Thai AUV for Corrugated Paper Is Aberrational Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Revise the Surrogate Value for Brokerage and Handling (‘‘B&H’’) Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–28757 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–838] Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 10, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube from Mexico.1 The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V. (Golden Dragon).2 The period of mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 1 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013±2014, 80 FR 47908 (August 10, 2015) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 The Department previously treated GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V. as part of a single entity including: (1) GD Copper Cooperatief U.A.; (2) Hong Kong GD Trading Co. Ltd.; (3) Golden Dragon 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The review covers one producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise, Golden Dragon. On August 10, 2015, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on seamless refined copper pipe and tube from Mexico. We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of the review. No interested party submitted comments. The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 review (POR) is November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014. No interested party submitted comments on the preliminary results. We made no changes to the margin calculation for the final results of this review. Therefore, the final results do not differ from the preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping margin for Golden Dragon is listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3874 or (202) 482–5973, respectively. The merchandise subject to the order 3 is seamless refined copper pipe and tube. The product is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7407.10.1500, 7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and 8415.90.8085. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description, available in the Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.; (4) GD Copper U.S.A. Inc.; (5) GD Affiliates Servicios S. de R.L. de C.V.; and (6) GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V., which is collectively referred to as Golden Dragon. See, e.g., Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 77 FR 59178 (September 26, 2012), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 3 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From Mexico and the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value From Mexico, 75 FR 71070 (November 22, 2010) (Amended Final and Order). PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Preliminary Decision Memorandum,4 remains dispositive. Final Results of the Review We determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or exported by GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V. and that entered, or were withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the POR. Assessment Rates The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to the Final Modification for Reviews,5 because the weighted-average dumping margins for Golden Dragon is zero, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.6 For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Golden Dragon for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.7 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of publication of these final results of review, pursuant to 19 CFR 356.8(a). Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of these final results for all shipments of seamless refined copper pipe and tube from Mexico entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Golden Dragon will be 0.00 percent, the weighted average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 4 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4. 5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). 6 Id. at 8102. 7 For a full discussion, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69942-69944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-918]


Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On July 15, 2015, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published the Preliminary Results of the sixth 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel wire 
garment hangers from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ We 
invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our 
analysis of the comments and information received, we made no changes 
to the final margin calculations of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. 
(``Shanghai Wells'').\2\ We continue to find Ningbo Dasheng Hanger 
Industry Co., Ltd. (``Ningbo Dasheng'') is not eligible for separate 
rate status and, therefore, is part of the PRC-wide entity. Listed 
below in the ``Final Results of the Administrative Review'' section of 
this notice are the final dumping margins. The period of review 
(``POR'') is October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 41480 (July 15, 2015) (``Preliminary 
Results'').
    \2\ The Department previously found that Shanghai Wells Hanger 
Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (``HK Wells'') and Hong Kong Wells 
Ltd. (USA) (``Wells USA'') are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells 
Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single entity 
(collectively, ``Shanghai Wells''). Because there were no changes in 
this review to the facts that supported that decision, we continue 
to find Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are affiliated and 
that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells comprise a single entity. See Steel 
Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the 
First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761 
(November 9, 2010), unchanged in First Administrative Review of 
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 76 FR 27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: November 12, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, Alexander Komisar, or 
Kathleen Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 
14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 
telephone: (202) 482-3927, (202) 482-7425, or (202) 482-7906, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The Department published the Preliminary Results on July 15, 2015. 
On August 24, 2015, M&B Metal Products Inc., (``Petitioner''), U.S. 
Distributors,\3\ Aristocraft of America LLC (``Aristocraft''), and 
Ningbo Dasheng submitted case briefs. On September 1, 2015, Petitioner 
submitted a rebuttal brief. On September 9, 2015, the Department held a 
public hearing where counsel for Petitioner, U.S. Distributors, and 
Aristocraft, presented issues raised in their case and rebuttal briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ FabriClean Supply Inc., Best For Less Dry Cleaners Supply 
LLC, Ideal Chemical & Supply Company, Laundry & Cleaners Supply 
Inc., Rocky Mountain Hanger MFG Co., Rosenberg Supply Co., Ltd, and 
ZTN Management Company, LLC, (collectively, ``U.S. Distributors''). 
The U.S. Distributors include importers of subject merchandise and a 
wholesaler of domestic like product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise that is subject to the order is steel wire garment 
hangers. The products subject to the order are currently classified 
under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (``HTSUS'') subheadings 
7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the merchandise remains dispositive. A full 
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum,\4\ which is hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See the Department's Memorandum, titled ``Steel Wire Garment 
Hangers from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision 
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Sixth Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review,'' dated concurrently with this notice 
(``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 69943]]

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested 
parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\5\ A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to 
this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, 
Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed 
directly on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The 
signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRC-Wide Entity

    Shaoxing Dingli and the Shaoxing Entity \6\ failed to respond to 
the Department's requests for information.\7\ These companies, 
therefore, are not eligible for separate rate status.\8\ Additionally, 
Ningbo Dasheng failed to adequately respond to all parts of the 
questionnaire, and therefore, is also not eligible for a separate 
rate.\9\ Accordingly, the Department finds that the PRC-wide entity 
includes these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ We selected two companies for individual examination, 
however, these two companies failed to respond. These companies are: 
1) Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd., (``Shaoxing 
Dingli''); and 2) Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufacture (collectively, 
``the Shaoxing Entity'').
    \7\ See Preliminary Results, at ``Respondent Selection'' 
section.
    \8\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 70850, 70851 (November 28, 2014).
    \9\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comment 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    Regarding the administrative review, the following weighted-average 
dumping margins exist for the period October 1, 2013, through September 
30, 2014:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                          Exporter                              margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.\10\........................       33.24
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the 
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ This rate applies to the single entity comprised of 
Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., and Hong Kong Wells Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with 
the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
these final results of review.
    Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we 
calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by 
aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each 
importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered 
value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\11\ Where the 
Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the 
total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total 
sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will 
direct CBP to assess importer-specific assessment rates based on the 
resulting per-unit rates.\12\ Where an importer- (or customer-) 
specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis, the 
Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the 
time of liquidation.\13\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad 
valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will 
instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \12\ Id.
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in 
NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that 
were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies 
individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct 
CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if 
the Department determines that an exporter had no shipments of the 
subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that 
exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be 
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the 
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above, 
the cash deposit rate will be established in the final results of these 
reviews (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash 
deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed 
PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate 
rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not 
been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 
will be the PRC-wide rate of 187.25 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC 
exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. We request a timely written notification of the return or 
destruction

[[Page 69944]]

of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: November 5, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: PRC-wide Treatment for Ningbo Dasheng
Comment 2: Selection of Financial Statements
Comment 3: Whether to Adjust U.S Prices for Un-refunded Value-Added 
Tax (``VAT'')
Comment 4: Whether the Thai AUV for Corrugated Paper Is Aberrational
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Revise the Surrogate Value 
for Brokerage and Handling (``B&H'')
Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-28757 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P