Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Provide That the Co-Location Services Offered by the Exchange Include 40 Gigabit Internet Protocol Network Connections in the Exchange's Data Center and To Amend the Exchange's Price List To Implement Fees for the New Service, 70027-70030 [2015-28693]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–NYSEMKT–2015–90 on the subject line. Paper Comments mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–NYSEMKT–2015–90. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–NYSEMKT– 2015–90, and should be submitted on or before December 3, 2015. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.20 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–28690 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76369; File No. SR–NYSE– 2015–54] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Provide That the Co-Location Services Offered by the Exchange Include 40 Gigabit Internet Protocol Network Connections in the Exchange’s Data Center and To Amend the Exchange’s Price List To Implement Fees for the New Service November 5, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that on October 28, 2015, New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to provide that the co-location services offered by the Exchange include 40 gigabit (‘‘Gb’’) internet protocol (‘‘IP’’) network connections in the Exchange’s data center. The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange’s Price List (‘‘Price List’’) to implement fees for the new service. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. 20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C.78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70027 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to change its rules to provide that the co-location 4 services offered by the Exchange include 40 Gb IP network connections in the Exchange’s data center. The Exchange proposes to amend the Price List to implement fees for the new service. Currently, the Exchange’s co-location services offer Users 5 access to two local area networks available in the data center: the IP network and the Liquidity Center Network (‘‘LCN’’).6 IP network access is currently available in 1 and 10 Gb capacities. The Exchange also offers 1, 10, and 40 Gb LCN network access and LCN 10 Gb LX network access.7 4 The Exchange initially filed rule changes relating to its co-location services with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) in 2010. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62960 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR 59310 (September 27, 2010) (SR–NYSE–2010–56) (the ‘‘Original Co-location Filing’’). The Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah, New Jersey (the ‘‘data center’’) from which it provides co-location services to Users. 5 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location services, a ‘‘User’’ means any market participant that requests to receive co-location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76008 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60190 (October 5, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–40). As specified in the Price List, a User that incurs colocation fees for a particular co-location service pursuant thereto would not be subject to co-location fees for the same co-location service charged by the Exchange’s affiliates NYSE MKT LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70206 (August 15, 2013), 78 FR 51765 (August 21, 2013) (SR–NYSE–2013–59). 6 See Original Co-location Filing, at 59311 and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74222 (February 6, 2015), 80 FR 7888 (February 12, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–05) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to include IP network connections). 7 See Original Co-location Filing, at 59311 and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70888 (November 15, 2013), 78 FR 69907 (November 21, Continued E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1 70028 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices The IP network and LCN provide Users with access to the Exchange’s trading and execution systems and to the Exchange’s proprietary market data products. The IP network also provides Users with access to away market data products. There is greater latency in the transmission of data between Users and the Exchange for the IP Network than for the LCN. The IP network provides Users that do not need the lower latency of the LCN with a less costly data center network option. Having another data center network also provides Users with the option to create redundancy in their infrastructure. The proposed rule change would allow Users to purchase 40 Gb IP network connections in the data center. The offering of a 40 Gb IP network connection in addition to the existing 1 and 10 Gb IP network connections would provide a User more choices regarding the bandwidth of its IP network connections, allowing it to select the option that best corresponds Type of service Description IP Network Access ............... 40 Gb circuit ....................... to its needs and is most cost-effective for that User. The 40 Gb IP network connection is expected to be available no later than April 15, 2016. The Exchange will announce the date that the 40 Gb IP network connection will be available through a customer notice. The Exchange proposes to establish the following fees for 40 Gb IP network connections: Amount of charge $10,000 per connection initial charge plus $17,000 monthly per connection. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,10 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,11 in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange believes that the proposed 40 Gb IP network connection is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers because it would make a service available to Users that require the increased IP network bandwidth, but Users that do not require the increased bandwidth could continue to request an existing lowerbandwidth IP network connection. Users that require lower latency levels may utilize LCN connections. The Exchange believes that the proposed service would remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest because the offering of a 40 Gb IP network connection in addition to the existing 1 and 10 Gb IP network connections would provide a User more choices regarding the bandwidth of its IP network connections, allowing it to select the option that best corresponds to its needs and is most cost-effective for that User. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,12 in particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. Overall, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees for the proposed 40 Gb IP network connection are reasonable because the Exchange proposes to offer the service as a convenience to Users, but in doing so will incur certain costs, including costs related to the data center facility, hardware and equipment and costs related to personnel required for initial installation and ongoing monitoring, support and maintenance of such service. The Exchange further believes that the proposed change is reasonable because the proposed fees directly relate to the level of services provided by the Exchange and, in turn, received by the User. In this regard, the fees proposed for 40 Gb IP network connections are higher than, for example, the fees for 10 Gb IP network connections because costs for the initial purchase and ongoing maintenance of the 40 IP network connections are generally higher than those of the lowerbandwidth connections. However, these 2013) (SR–NYSE–2013–73) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to include LCN 10 Gb LX connection). 8 As is currently the case, Users that receive colocation services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to the Exchange’s trading and execution systems that is separate from, or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent to the Exchange enter the Exchange’s trading and execution systems through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users do not receive any market data or data service product that is not available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location services normally would expect reduced latencies in sending orders to, and receiving market data from, the Exchange. 9 See SR–NYSE–2013–59, supra note 5 at 51766. The Exchange’s affiliates have also submitted the same proposed rule change to propose the changes described herein. See SR–NYSEMKT–2015–90 and SR–NYSEArca–2015–105. 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). By comparison, the 1 Gb IP network connection costs $2,500 per connection initial charge plus $2,500 monthly per connection and the 10 Gb IP network connection costs $10,000 per connection initial charge plus $10,000 monthly per connection. The 40 Gb LCN circuit costs $15,000 per connection initial charge plus $20,000 monthly per connection. As is the case with all Exchange colocation arrangements, (i) neither a User nor any of the User’s customers would be permitted to submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is a member organization, a Sponsored Participant or an agent thereof (e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services); (ii) use of the colocation services proposed herein would be completely voluntary and available to all Users on a non-discriminatory basis; 8 and (iii) a User would only incur one charge for the particular co-location service described herein, regardless of whether the User connects only to the Exchange or to the Exchange and one or both of its affiliates.9 The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other issues relating to co-location services and/or related fees, and the Exchange is not aware of any problems that Users would have in complying with the proposed change. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 2. Statutory Basis VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices costs are not anticipated to be four times higher than the existing 10 Gb IP network connection. The Exchange therefore notes that while the proposed bandwidth of the 40 Gb IP network connection is four times greater than the existing 10 Gb IP connection, the proposed fees for the 40 Gb IP network connection are significantly less than four times the fees for the 10 Gb IP connection. Specifically, the proposed initial charge of $10,000 is the same as the initial charge for the existing 10 Gb IP network connection and the proposed monthly recurring charge of $17,000 is less than double the $10,000 monthly charge for the existing 10 Gb IP network connection. The Exchange believes that this supports a finding that the proposed pricing is reasonable because the Exchange anticipates realizing efficiencies as customers adopt higherbandwidth connections, and, in turn, reflecting such efficiencies in the pricing for such connections. As with fees for existing co-location services, the fees proposed herein would be charged only to those Users that voluntarily select the 40 Gb IP network connection, which would be available to all Users. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will result in fees being charged only to Users that voluntarily select to receive the corresponding services and because those services will be available to all Users. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the services and fees proposed herein are not unfairly discriminatory and are equitably allocated because, in addition to the services being completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis (i.e., the same products and services are available to all Users). All Users that voluntarily select the proposed 40 Gb IP network service will be charged the same amount for the service. For the reasons above, the proposed change would not unfairly discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements, terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange. Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange’s statement regarding the burden on competition. For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the Act. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,13 the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because, in addition to the proposed service being completely voluntary, it will be available to all Users on an equal basis (i.e. the same products and services are available to all Users). The Exchange believes that allowing Users to purchase 40 Gb IP network connections will not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because such service will be available to Users that require the increased IP network bandwidth, but Users that do not require the increased bandwidth could continue to request an existing lowerbandwidth IP network connection. The offering of a 40 Gb IP network connection in addition to the existing 1 and 10 Gb IP network connections would provide a User more choices regarding the bandwidth of its IP network connections, allowing it to select the option that best corresponds to its needs and is most cost-effective for that User. In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed change will enhance competition, in that The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’) similarly makes a 40 Gb fiber connection available to users of its co-location facilities.14 Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its services and related fees and credits to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 15 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.16 Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder. A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 17 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),18 the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 19 of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– NYSE–2015–54 on the subject line. 15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 16 17 13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). NASDAQ Rule 7034 for a description of NASDAQ’s co-location services. 14 See PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70029 E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1 70030 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–NYSE–2015–54. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–NYSE– 2015–54, and should be submitted on or before December 3, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.20 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–28693 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76365; File No. SR– NASDAQ–2015–130] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify Chapter XV, Entitled ‘‘Options Pricing,’’ at Section 2 Governing Pricing for NASDAQ Members November 5, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on October 29, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange’s transaction fees at Chapter XV, Section 2 entitled ‘‘NASDAQ Options Market—Fees and Rebates,’’ which governs pricing for NASDAQ members using the NASDAQ Options Market (‘‘NOM’’), NASDAQ’s facility for executing and routing standardized equity and index options. While these amendments are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated the proposed amendments to be operative on November 2, 2015. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set 1 15 20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Nov 10, 2015 2 17 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes the following change to the NOM transaction fees set forth at Chapter XV, Section 2 for executing and routing standardized equity and index options under the Penny Pilot 3 Options program. The proposed change is as follows: Fees for Removing Liquidity in Penny Pilot Options: the Exchange proposes to: 1. Increase the Non-NOM Market Maker4 fee from $0.50 to $0.55 per 3 The Penny Pilot was established in March 2008 and has since been expanded and extended through June 30, 2016. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 57579 (March 28, 2008), 73 FR 18587 (April 4, 2008) (SR–NASDAQ–2008–026) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness establishing Penny Pilot); 60874 (October 23, 2009), 74 FR 56682 (November 2, 2009) (SR–NASDAQ–2009–091) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness expanding and extending Penny Pilot); 60965 (November 9, 2009), 74 FR 59292 (November 17, 2009) (SR–NASDAQ–2009–097) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness adding seventy-five classes to Penny Pilot); 61455 (February 1, 2010), 75 FR 6239 (February 8, 2010) (SR–NASDAQ– 2010–013) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness adding seventy-five classes to Penny Pilot); 62029 (May 4, 2010), 75 FR 25895 (May 10, 2010) (SR–NASDAQ–2010–053) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness adding seventy-five classes to Penny Pilot); 65969 (December 15, 2011), 76 FR 79268 (December 21, 2011) (SR–NASDAQ– 2011–169) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness extension and replacement of Penny Pilot); 67325 (June 29, 2012), 77 FR 40127 (July 6, 2012) (SR–NASDAQ–2012–075) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness and extension and replacement of Penny Pilot through December 31, 2012); 68519 (December 21, 2012), 78 FR 136 (January 2, 2013) (SR–NASDAQ–2012–143) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness and extension and replacement of Penny Pilot through June 30, 2013); 69787 (June 18, 2013), 78 FR 37858 (June 24, 2013) (SR–NASDAQ–2013–082) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness and extension and replacement of Penny Pilot through December 31, 2013); 71105 (December 17, 2013), 78 FR 77530 (December 23, 2013) (SR–NASDAQ–2013–154) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness and extension and replacement of Penny Pilot through June 30, 2014); 79 FR 31151 (May 23, 2014), 79 FR 31151 (May 30, 2014) (SR–NASDAQ–2014–056) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness and extension and replacement of Penny Pilot through December 31, 2014); 73686 (December 2, 2014), 79 FR 71477 (November 25, 2014) (SR–NASDAQ– 2014–115) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness and extension and replacement of Penny Pilot through June 30, 2015) and 75283 (June 24, 2015), 80 FR 37347 (June 30, 2015) (SR– NASDAQ–2015–063) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Extension of the Exchange’s Penny Pilot Program and Replacement of Penny Pilot Issues That Have Been Delisted.) See also NOM Rules, Chapter VI, Section 5. 4 The term ‘‘NOM Market Maker’’ or (‘‘M’’) is a Participant that has registered as a Market Maker on NOM pursuant to Chapter VII, Section 2, and must E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM 12NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70027-70030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76369; File No. SR-NYSE-2015-54]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To 
Provide That the Co-Location Services Offered by the Exchange Include 
40 Gigabit Internet Protocol Network Connections in the Exchange's Data 
Center and To Amend the Exchange's Price List To Implement Fees for the 
New Service

November 5, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that on October 28, 2015, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' 
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, 
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to provide that the co-location services 
offered by the Exchange include 40 gigabit (``Gb'') internet protocol 
(``IP'') network connections in the Exchange's data center. The 
Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Price List (``Price List'') 
to implement fees for the new service. The text of the proposed rule 
change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the 
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to change its rules to provide that the co-
location \4\ services offered by the Exchange include 40 Gb IP network 
connections in the Exchange's data center. The Exchange proposes to 
amend the Price List to implement fees for the new service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange initially filed rule changes relating to its 
co-location services with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') in 2010. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
62960 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR 59310 (September 27, 2010) (SR-
NYSE-2010-56) (the ``Original Co-location Filing''). The Exchange 
operates a data center in Mahwah, New Jersey (the ``data center'') 
from which it provides co-location services to Users.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the Exchange's co-location services offer Users \5\ 
access to two local area networks available in the data center: the IP 
network and the Liquidity Center Network (``LCN'').\6\ IP network 
access is currently available in 1 and 10 Gb capacities. The Exchange 
also offers 1, 10, and 40 Gb LCN network access and LCN 10 Gb LX 
network access.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, a 
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive co-
location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 76008 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60190 
(October 5, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-40). As specified in the Price List, 
a User that incurs co-location fees for a particular co-location 
service pursuant thereto would not be subject to co-location fees 
for the same co-location service charged by the Exchange's 
affiliates NYSE MKT LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc. See Securities Exchange 
Act Release No. 70206 (August 15, 2013), 78 FR 51765 (August 21, 
2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-59).
    \6\ See Original Co-location Filing, at 59311 and Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 74222 (February 6, 2015), 80 FR 7888 
(February 12, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-05) (notice of filing and 
immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to include IP 
network connections).
    \7\ See Original Co-location Filing, at 59311 and Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 70888 (November 15, 2013), 78 FR 69907 
(November 21, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-73) (notice of filing and 
immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to include LCN 10 Gb 
LX connection).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 70028]]

    The IP network and LCN provide Users with access to the Exchange's 
trading and execution systems and to the Exchange's proprietary market 
data products. The IP network also provides Users with access to away 
market data products. There is greater latency in the transmission of 
data between Users and the Exchange for the IP Network than for the 
LCN. The IP network provides Users that do not need the lower latency 
of the LCN with a less costly data center network option. Having 
another data center network also provides Users with the option to 
create redundancy in their infrastructure.
    The proposed rule change would allow Users to purchase 40 Gb IP 
network connections in the data center. The offering of a 40 Gb IP 
network connection in addition to the existing 1 and 10 Gb IP network 
connections would provide a User more choices regarding the bandwidth 
of its IP network connections, allowing it to select the option that 
best corresponds to its needs and is most cost-effective for that User.
    The 40 Gb IP network connection is expected to be available no 
later than April 15, 2016. The Exchange will announce the date that the 
40 Gb IP network connection will be available through a customer 
notice.
    The Exchange proposes to establish the following fees for 40 Gb IP 
network connections:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Type of service                      Description                       Amount of charge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IP Network Access.......................  40 Gb circuit..............  $10,000 per connection initial charge
                                                                        plus $17,000 monthly per connection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By comparison, the 1 Gb IP network connection costs $2,500 per 
connection initial charge plus $2,500 monthly per connection and the 10 
Gb IP network connection costs $10,000 per connection initial charge 
plus $10,000 monthly per connection. The 40 Gb LCN circuit costs 
$15,000 per connection initial charge plus $20,000 monthly per 
connection.
    As is the case with all Exchange co-location arrangements, (i) 
neither a User nor any of the User's customers would be permitted to 
submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is 
a member organization, a Sponsored Participant or an agent thereof 
(e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services); (ii) use of 
the co-location services proposed herein would be completely voluntary 
and available to all Users on a non-discriminatory basis; \8\ and (iii) 
a User would only incur one charge for the particular co-location 
service described herein, regardless of whether the User connects only 
to the Exchange or to the Exchange and one or both of its 
affiliates.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As is currently the case, Users that receive co-location 
services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to 
the Exchange's trading and execution systems that is separate from, 
or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent 
to the Exchange enter the Exchange's trading and execution systems 
through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is 
co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users 
do not receive any market data or data service product that is not 
available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location 
services normally would expect reduced latencies in sending orders 
to, and receiving market data from, the Exchange.
    \9\ See SR-NYSE-2013-59, supra note 5 at 51766. The Exchange's 
affiliates have also submitted the same proposed rule change to 
propose the changes described herein. See SR-NYSEMKT-2015-90 and SR-
NYSEArca-2015-105.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other 
issues relating to co-location services and/or related fees, and the 
Exchange is not aware of any problems that Users would have in 
complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\10\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular, because 
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and 
perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market 
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest 
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed 40 Gb IP network connection 
is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers because it would make a service available 
to Users that require the increased IP network bandwidth, but Users 
that do not require the increased bandwidth could continue to request 
an existing lower-bandwidth IP network connection. Users that require 
lower latency levels may utilize LCN connections.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed service would remove 
impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market 
and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the 
public interest because the offering of a 40 Gb IP network connection 
in addition to the existing 1 and 10 Gb IP network connections would 
provide a User more choices regarding the bandwidth of its IP network 
connections, allowing it to select the option that best corresponds to 
its needs and is most cost-effective for that User.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\12\ in particular, because 
it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and 
other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its 
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, 
issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Overall, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees for the 
proposed 40 Gb IP network connection are reasonable because the 
Exchange proposes to offer the service as a convenience to Users, but 
in doing so will incur certain costs, including costs related to the 
data center facility, hardware and equipment and costs related to 
personnel required for initial installation and ongoing monitoring, 
support and maintenance of such service.
    The Exchange further believes that the proposed change is 
reasonable because the proposed fees directly relate to the level of 
services provided by the Exchange and, in turn, received by the User. 
In this regard, the fees proposed for 40 Gb IP network connections are 
higher than, for example, the fees for 10 Gb IP network connections 
because costs for the initial purchase and ongoing maintenance of the 
40 IP network connections are generally higher than those of the lower-
bandwidth connections. However, these

[[Page 70029]]

costs are not anticipated to be four times higher than the existing 10 
Gb IP network connection. The Exchange therefore notes that while the 
proposed bandwidth of the 40 Gb IP network connection is four times 
greater than the existing 10 Gb IP connection, the proposed fees for 
the 40 Gb IP network connection are significantly less than four times 
the fees for the 10 Gb IP connection. Specifically, the proposed 
initial charge of $10,000 is the same as the initial charge for the 
existing 10 Gb IP network connection and the proposed monthly recurring 
charge of $17,000 is less than double the $10,000 monthly charge for 
the existing 10 Gb IP network connection. The Exchange believes that 
this supports a finding that the proposed pricing is reasonable because 
the Exchange anticipates realizing efficiencies as customers adopt 
higher-bandwidth connections, and, in turn, reflecting such 
efficiencies in the pricing for such connections.
    As with fees for existing co-location services, the fees proposed 
herein would be charged only to those Users that voluntarily select the 
40 Gb IP network connection, which would be available to all Users. 
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed change is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will result in 
fees being charged only to Users that voluntarily select to receive the 
corresponding services and because those services will be available to 
all Users. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the services and 
fees proposed herein are not unfairly discriminatory and are equitably 
allocated because, in addition to the services being completely 
voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis (i.e., the 
same products and services are available to all Users). All Users that 
voluntarily select the proposed 40 Gb IP network service will be 
charged the same amount for the service.
    For the reasons above, the proposed change would not unfairly 
discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise 
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements, 
terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition.
    For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is 
consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\13\ the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act because, in addition to the proposed service being 
completely voluntary, it will be available to all Users on an equal 
basis (i.e. the same products and services are available to all Users).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that allowing Users to purchase 40 Gb IP 
network connections will not impose any burden on competition that is 
not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act 
because such service will be available to Users that require the 
increased IP network bandwidth, but Users that do not require the 
increased bandwidth could continue to request an existing lower-
bandwidth IP network connection. The offering of a 40 Gb IP network 
connection in addition to the existing 1 and 10 Gb IP network 
connections would provide a User more choices regarding the bandwidth 
of its IP network connections, allowing it to select the option that 
best corresponds to its needs and is most cost-effective for that User. 
In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed change will 
enhance competition, in that The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'') 
similarly makes a 40 Gb fiber connection available to users of its co-
location facilities.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See NASDAQ Rule 7034 for a description of NASDAQ's co-
location services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually 
review, and consider adjusting, its services and related fees and 
credits to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons 
described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change 
reflects this competitive environment.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \15\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\16\ 
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the 
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as 
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \17\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\18\ the Commission 
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \19\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File No. SR-NYSE-2015-54 on the subject line.

[[Page 70030]]

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2015-54. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2015-54, and should be 
submitted on or before December 3, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-28693 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.