Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 69234-69235 [2015-28368]
Download as PDF
69234
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 216 / Monday, November 9, 2015 / Notices
Written comments should be received
by January 8, 2016.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2015–28415 Filed 11–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Quarterly Progress
Reporting and Annual Indirect Services
Outcome Data Collection for the
Minority Substance Abuse/HIV
Prevention Program (MAI)—NEW
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), Center for Substance Abuse
Prevention (CSAP) is requesting
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for the collection of
quarterly progress information and
annual community-level outcome data
from CSAP’s Minority AIDS Initiative
(MAI) programs.
This data collection effort supports
two of SAMHSA’s 6 Strategic Initiatives:
Prevention of Substance Abuse and
Mental Illness and Health Care and
Health Systems Integration. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:52 Nov 06, 2015
Jkt 238001
grantees funded by the MAI and
included in this clearance request are:
• Minority Serving Institutions (MSI)
in Partnerships with Community-Based
Organizations (CBO): 84 grantees
funded up to three years;
• Capacity Building Initiative (CBI):
74 grantees funded up to five years.
MSI CBO grantees are Historically
Black Colleges/Universities, Hispanic
Serving Institutions, American Pacific
Islander Serving Institutions, or Tribal
Colleges/Universities in partnership
with community based organizations in
their surrounding communities. MSI
CBO grantees are required to provide
integrated substance abuse (SA),
Hepatitis C (HCV), and HIV prevention
services to young adults. The CBI
grantees are community-level domestic,
public and private nonprofit entities,
federally recognized American Indian/
Alaska Native Tribes and tribal
organizations, and urban Indian
organizations. CBI grantees will use
grant funds for building a solid
infrastructure for integrated SA, HIV,
and HCV prevention service provision
and implementing evidence-based
prevention interventions using
SAMHSA’s Strategic Prevention
Framework (SPF) process. The target
population for the CBI grantees will be
at-risk minority adolescents and young
adults. All MAI grantees are expected to
provide leadership and coordination on
the planning and implementation of the
SPF and to target minority populations,
as well as other high risk groups
residing in communities of color with
high prevalence of SA and HIV/AIDS.
The MAI grantees are expected to
provide an effective prevention process,
direction, and a common set of goals,
expectations, and accountabilities to be
adapted and integrated at the
community level. Grantees have
substantial flexibility in choosing their
individual evidence-based programs,
but must base this selection on and
build it into the five steps of the SPF.
These SPF steps consist of assessing
local needs, building service capacity
specific to SA and HIV prevention
services, developing a strategic
prevention plan, implementing
evidence-based interventions, and
evaluating their outcomes. Grantees are
also required to provide HIV and HCV
testing and counseling services and
referrals to appropriate treatment
options. Grantees must also conduct
ongoing monitoring and evaluation of
their projects to assess program
effectiveness including Federal
reporting of the Government
Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of
1993, The GPRA Modernization Act of
2010, SAMHSA/CSAP National
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Outcome Measures (NOMs), and the
Department of Health and Human
Services Core HIV Indicators.
The primary objectives of this data
collection effort are to:
• Ensure the correct implementation
of the five steps of the SPF process by
maintaining a continuous feedback loop
between grantees and their POs;
• Promptly respond to grantees’
needs for training and technical
assistance;
• Assess the fidelity with which the
SPF is implemented;
• Collect aggregate data on HIV
testing to fulfill SAMHSA’s reporting
and accountability obligations as
defined by the Government Performance
and Results Modernization Act (GPRA
Modernization Act) and HHS’s HIV Core
Measures;
• Assess the success of the MAI in
reducing risk factors and increasing
protective factors associated with the
transmission of the Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV),
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and other
sexually-transmitted diseases (STD);
• Measure the effectiveness of
evidence-based programs and
infrastructure development activities
such as: outreach and training,
mobilization of key stakeholders,
substance abuse and HIV/AIDS
counseling and education, testing,
referrals to appropriate medical
treatment, and other intervention
strategies (e.g., cultural enrichment
activities, educational and vocational
resources, motivational interviewing &
brief interventions, social marketing,
and computer-based curricula);
• Investigate intervention types and
features that produce the best outcomes
for specific population groups;
• Assess the extent to which access to
health care was enhanced for
population groups and individuals
vulnerable to behavioral health
disparities residing in communities
targeted by funded interventions;
These objectives support the four
primary goals of the National HIV/AIDS
Strategy which are: (1) Reducing new
HIV infections, (2) increasing access to
care and improving health outcomes for
people living with HIV/AIDS, (3)
reducing HIV-related disparities and
health inequities, and (4) achieving a
coordinated national response to the
HIV epidemic.
The Quarterly Progress Reporting
(QPR) Tool is a modular instrument
structured around the SPF. Each section
or module corresponds to a SPF step
with an additional section dedicated to
cultural competence and efforts to
address behavioral health disparities,
which is an overarching principle of the
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
69235
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 216 / Monday, November 9, 2015 / Notices
framework guiding every step. Grantees
provide quarterly reports of their
progress through the SPF. Each quarter’s
report consists of updates to the
module(s) corresponding to the SPF
steps that the grantee worked on during
that quarter. Grantees are required to
report on their activities,
accomplishments, and barriers
associated with cultural competence
and reduction of health disparities twice
a year, as part of the second- and fourthquarter progress reports. Data on HIV/
HCV testing and hepatitis vaccination
are reported only in the aggregate (e.g.
numbers tested and percent of tests that
were positive). No individual-level
information is collected through this
instrument.
The Indirect Services Outcomes Data
Tool collects annual data on
community-level outcome measures.
These data typically come from existing
sources such as ongoing community
surveys and administrative data
collected by local agencies and
institutions such as law enforcement,
school districts, college campuses,
hospitals, and health departments. The
data are submitted to SAMHSA in the
form of community-level averages,
percentages, or rates, and are used to
assess the grantees’ success in changing
community norms, policies, practices,
and systems through environmental
strategies and information
dissemination activities. As with the
QPR, no individual-level information is
collected through this instrument.
The third data collection instrument
for which approval is being sought is
intended to collect FY 2015 data on the
HIV testing activities of the grantees. It
will be used once only, immediately
after the system goes online, in order to
collect data for two of the seven HHS
Core Indicators that SAMHSA/CSAP
has agreed to report. Although this
statement refers to it as a separate
instrument for purposes of clarity in
burden estimation, it has the same data
fields as the HIV Testing
Implementation section of the main
Quarterly Progress Report tool and
differs only in its reporting timeframe.
Although the main purpose of this
data collection effort is to provide a
standard and efficient system for
SAMHSA’s project officers to maintain
a feedback loop with the grantees that
they manage and to respond to training
and technical assistance needs in a
timely fashion, the data will also be
incorporated into the national cross-site
evaluation. By combining this granteelevel implementation information and
community-level outcome data with
participant-level pre-post data,
SAMHSA will be able to identify
interventions and intervention
combinations that produce the most
favorable outcomes at the individual
and community levels, and to
investigate the interaction between
participant- and grantee-level factors in
predicting positive outcomes.
Respondent burden has been limited
to the extent possible while allowing
SAMHSA project officers to effectively
manage, monitor, and provide sufficient
guidance to their grantees, and for the
cross-site evaluation to reliably assess
program outcomes and successful
strategies. The following table displays
estimates of the annualized burden for
data collected through the Quarterly
Progress Reporting and Indirect Services
outcomes data collection tools.
ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN
EXHIBIT 1—TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN BY INSTRUMENT
Type of respondent activity
Number of
respondents
Responses per
respondent
Total
responses
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
Wage rate
Total hour cost
Quarterly Progress Report ...........................
Indirect Services Outcomes .......................
HIV Testing Retrospective Reporting Tool ...
158
4
632
4
2,528
$21.79
$55,085
158
1
158
2
316
21.79
6,886
50
1/3
16.67
0.25
4.17
21.79
91
Total ......................
158
........................
806.67
........................
2,848
........................
62,062
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 2–1057, One Choke Cherry Road,
Rockville, MD 20857 or email her a
copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
by January 8, 2016.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2015–28368 Filed 11–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0864]
Certificate of Alternative Compliance
for the M/V LEIGH ANN MORAN,
1261986
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard announces
that a Certificate of Alternative
Compliance was issued for the
Uninspected Towing Vessel LEIGH
ANN MORAN as required by statute.
DATES: The Certificate of Alternative
Compliance was issued on September
28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this notice is
available for inspection or copying at
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:52 Nov 06, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0508 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
If
you have questions on this notice, call
LT Steven Melvin, District Nine,
Prevention Branch, U.S. Coast Guard,
telephone 216–902–6343. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 216 (Monday, November 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69234-69235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28368]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Quarterly Progress Reporting and Annual Indirect
Services Outcome Data Collection for the Minority Substance Abuse/HIV
Prevention Program (MAI)--NEW
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) is requesting
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the
collection of quarterly progress information and annual community-level
outcome data from CSAP's Minority AIDS Initiative (MAI) programs.
This data collection effort supports two of SAMHSA's 6 Strategic
Initiatives: Prevention of Substance Abuse and Mental Illness and
Health Care and Health Systems Integration. The grantees funded by the
MAI and included in this clearance request are:
Minority Serving Institutions (MSI) in Partnerships with
Community-Based Organizations (CBO): 84 grantees funded up to three
years;
Capacity Building Initiative (CBI): 74 grantees funded up
to five years.
MSI CBO grantees are Historically Black Colleges/Universities,
Hispanic Serving Institutions, American Pacific Islander Serving
Institutions, or Tribal Colleges/Universities in partnership with
community based organizations in their surrounding communities. MSI CBO
grantees are required to provide integrated substance abuse (SA),
Hepatitis C (HCV), and HIV prevention services to young adults. The CBI
grantees are community-level domestic, public and private nonprofit
entities, federally recognized American Indian/Alaska Native Tribes and
tribal organizations, and urban Indian organizations. CBI grantees will
use grant funds for building a solid infrastructure for integrated SA,
HIV, and HCV prevention service provision and implementing evidence-
based prevention interventions using SAMHSA's Strategic Prevention
Framework (SPF) process. The target population for the CBI grantees
will be at-risk minority adolescents and young adults. All MAI grantees
are expected to provide leadership and coordination on the planning and
implementation of the SPF and to target minority populations, as well
as other high risk groups residing in communities of color with high
prevalence of SA and HIV/AIDS.
The MAI grantees are expected to provide an effective prevention
process, direction, and a common set of goals, expectations, and
accountabilities to be adapted and integrated at the community level.
Grantees have substantial flexibility in choosing their individual
evidence-based programs, but must base this selection on and build it
into the five steps of the SPF. These SPF steps consist of assessing
local needs, building service capacity specific to SA and HIV
prevention services, developing a strategic prevention plan,
implementing evidence-based interventions, and evaluating their
outcomes. Grantees are also required to provide HIV and HCV testing and
counseling services and referrals to appropriate treatment options.
Grantees must also conduct ongoing monitoring and evaluation of their
projects to assess program effectiveness including Federal reporting of
the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993, The GPRA
Modernization Act of 2010, SAMHSA/CSAP National Outcome Measures
(NOMs), and the Department of Health and Human Services Core HIV
Indicators.
The primary objectives of this data collection effort are to:
Ensure the correct implementation of the five steps of the
SPF process by maintaining a continuous feedback loop between grantees
and their POs;
Promptly respond to grantees' needs for training and
technical assistance;
Assess the fidelity with which the SPF is implemented;
Collect aggregate data on HIV testing to fulfill SAMHSA's
reporting and accountability obligations as defined by the Government
Performance and Results Modernization Act (GPRA Modernization Act) and
HHS's HIV Core Measures;
Assess the success of the MAI in reducing risk factors and
increasing protective factors associated with the transmission of the
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and other
sexually-transmitted diseases (STD);
Measure the effectiveness of evidence-based programs and
infrastructure development activities such as: outreach and training,
mobilization of key stakeholders, substance abuse and HIV/AIDS
counseling and education, testing, referrals to appropriate medical
treatment, and other intervention strategies (e.g., cultural enrichment
activities, educational and vocational resources, motivational
interviewing & brief interventions, social marketing, and computer-
based curricula);
Investigate intervention types and features that produce
the best outcomes for specific population groups;
Assess the extent to which access to health care was
enhanced for population groups and individuals vulnerable to behavioral
health disparities residing in communities targeted by funded
interventions;
These objectives support the four primary goals of the National
HIV/AIDS Strategy which are: (1) Reducing new HIV infections, (2)
increasing access to care and improving health outcomes for people
living with HIV/AIDS, (3) reducing HIV-related disparities and health
inequities, and (4) achieving a coordinated national response to the
HIV epidemic.
The Quarterly Progress Reporting (QPR) Tool is a modular instrument
structured around the SPF. Each section or module corresponds to a SPF
step with an additional section dedicated to cultural competence and
efforts to address behavioral health disparities, which is an
overarching principle of the
[[Page 69235]]
framework guiding every step. Grantees provide quarterly reports of
their progress through the SPF. Each quarter's report consists of
updates to the module(s) corresponding to the SPF steps that the
grantee worked on during that quarter. Grantees are required to report
on their activities, accomplishments, and barriers associated with
cultural competence and reduction of health disparities twice a year,
as part of the second- and fourth-quarter progress reports. Data on
HIV/HCV testing and hepatitis vaccination are reported only in the
aggregate (e.g. numbers tested and percent of tests that were
positive). No individual-level information is collected through this
instrument.
The Indirect Services Outcomes Data Tool collects annual data on
community-level outcome measures. These data typically come from
existing sources such as ongoing community surveys and administrative
data collected by local agencies and institutions such as law
enforcement, school districts, college campuses, hospitals, and health
departments. The data are submitted to SAMHSA in the form of community-
level averages, percentages, or rates, and are used to assess the
grantees' success in changing community norms, policies, practices, and
systems through environmental strategies and information dissemination
activities. As with the QPR, no individual-level information is
collected through this instrument.
The third data collection instrument for which approval is being
sought is intended to collect FY 2015 data on the HIV testing
activities of the grantees. It will be used once only, immediately
after the system goes online, in order to collect data for two of the
seven HHS Core Indicators that SAMHSA/CSAP has agreed to report.
Although this statement refers to it as a separate instrument for
purposes of clarity in burden estimation, it has the same data fields
as the HIV Testing Implementation section of the main Quarterly
Progress Report tool and differs only in its reporting timeframe.
Although the main purpose of this data collection effort is to
provide a standard and efficient system for SAMHSA's project officers
to maintain a feedback loop with the grantees that they manage and to
respond to training and technical assistance needs in a timely fashion,
the data will also be incorporated into the national cross-site
evaluation. By combining this grantee-level implementation information
and community-level outcome data with participant-level pre-post data,
SAMHSA will be able to identify interventions and intervention
combinations that produce the most favorable outcomes at the individual
and community levels, and to investigate the interaction between
participant- and grantee-level factors in predicting positive outcomes.
Respondent burden has been limited to the extent possible while
allowing SAMHSA project officers to effectively manage, monitor, and
provide sufficient guidance to their grantees, and for the cross-site
evaluation to reliably assess program outcomes and successful
strategies. The following table displays estimates of the annualized
burden for data collected through the Quarterly Progress Reporting and
Indirect Services outcomes data collection tools.
Estimates of Annualized Hour Burden
Exhibit 1--Total Estimated Annualized Burden by Instrument
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses per Total Hours per Total burden Total hour
Type of respondent activity respondents respondent responses response hours Wage rate cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quarterly Progress Report............... 158 4 632 4 2,528 $21.79 $55,085
Indirect Services Outcomes.............. 158 1 158 2 316 21.79 6,886
HIV Testing Retrospective Reporting Tool 50 1/3 16.67 0.25 4.17 21.79 91
Total............................... 158 .............. 806.67 .............. 2,848 .............. 62,062
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 2-1057, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 or email her a
copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received
by January 8, 2016.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2015-28368 Filed 11-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P