Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Risk Monitor Mechanism, 68595-68599 [2015-28143]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 214 / Thursday, November 5, 2015 / Notices
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
supersede certain of the broker-dealer
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Responsibilities of Rule 13h–1.59
Specifically, the Commission stated:
‘‘[t]o the extent that . . . data reported
to the central repository under Rule 613
obviates the need for the EBS system,
the Commission expects that the
separate [trade] reporting requirements
of Rule 13h–1 related to the EBS system
would be eliminated.’’ 60
The SROs submitted the initial CAT
NMS plan to the Commission on
September 30, 2014, and filed an
amended plan on February 27, 2015.61
As of the date of this Order, an NMS
plan for a CAT has not yet been
published for notice and comment.
Accordingly, the Commission continues
to rely on, among other things,
information available through the
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Responsibilities as implemented
through Phases One and Two. In light
of the fact that there is no approved
CAT NMS plan, the Commission is
hesitant at this time to require brokerdealers to incur the costs associated
with the remaining Phase Three Large
Trader data while the timing of a CAT
remains unclear.
However, the Commission finds that
it is consistent with the purposes of the
Exchange Act to delay Phase Three,
temporarily exempting broker-dealers
until November 1, 2017 from the
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Responsibilities, except for: (1) The
clearing broker-dealer for a large trader,
with respect to (a) proprietary
transactions by a large trader brokerdealer; (b) transactions effected
pursuant to a ‘‘sponsored access’’
arrangement; and (c) transactions
effected pursuant to a ‘‘direct market
access’’ arrangement; and (2) a brokerdealer that carries an account for a large
trader, with respect to transactions other
than those set forth above, and for
Transaction Data other than the
execution time. While FIF and SIFMA
have requested a permanent exemption,
or alternatively an additional 5-year
deferment of the compliance date for
Phase Three,62 the Commission believes
59 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67457
(July 18, 2012), 77 FR 45722, 45734 (August 1,
2012).
60 Id., text accompanying n.95.
61 Pursuant to Rule 613, the SROs were required
to file the CAT NMS Plan on or before April 28,
2013. At the SROs’ request, the Commission granted
exemptions to extend the deadline for filing the
CAT NMS Plan to December 6, 2013, and then to
September 30, 2014. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 69060 (Mar. 7, 2013), 78 FR 15771
(Mar. 12, 2013) and 71018 (Dec. 6, 2013), 78 FR
75669 (Dec. 12, 2013).
62 See FIF Letter, supra note 6, at 3 and SIFMA
Letter, supra note 9, at 2–3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Nov 04, 2015
Jkt 238001
68595
at this time that a 2-year extension of
the Phase Three compliance date
provides sufficient time for the
Commission to consider whether to
revisit compliance with all of the
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Responsibilities. Specifically, two years
will give the Commission enough time
to evaluate future developments,
including any investment in or progress
on a CAT.63
By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
III. Conclusion
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Risk Monitor Mechanism
It is hereby ordered, pursuant to
Section 13(h)(6) of the Exchange Act
and Rule 13h–1(g) thereunder, that:
(1) Persons transacting in equity
options are exempt from the SelfIdentification Requirements if: (1) The
aggregate value of their equity option
transactions, calculated based on
premium paid, combined with the
aggregate value of their transactions in
all other NMS securities (if any), does
not reach or exceed the fair market
value thresholds of the identifying
activity level; and (2) they also do not
reach or exceed the share volume
thresholds of the identifying activity
level.
(2) A large trader whose transactions
in NMS securities since October 3, 2011
reached the identifying activity level
one or more times because of the fair
market value of its equity options
transactions and who would have
qualified in each instance for relief
under this exemption is exempt from its
responsibilities under Rule 13h–
1(b)(1)(ii), 13h–1(b)(1)(iii), and 13h–
1(b)(2), if such trader files for inactive
status by submitting Form 13H and does
not subsequently effect transactions that
reach or exceed the identifying activity
threshold using premium paid to
calculate the fair market value of equity
options transactions.
(3) Broker-dealers are exempted
temporarily until November 1, 2017
from the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements of Rule 13h–1(d) and (e),
except for (1) clearing broker-dealers for
large traders with respect to (a)
proprietary transactions by a large trader
broker-dealer, (b) transactions effected
pursuant to a ‘‘sponsored access’’
arrangement, and (c) transactions
effected pursuant to a ‘‘direct market
access’’ arrangement; and, for other
types of transactions, (2) broker-dealers
that carry an account for a large trader
for Transaction Data other than the
execution time.
63 See
PO 00000
note 60, supra, and accompanying text.
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2015–28147 Filed 11–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–76316; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2015–122]
October 30, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
16, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items
have been prepared by NASDAQ. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NASDAQ proposes to amend Chapter
VI, Section 19 entitled ‘‘Risk Monitor
Mechanism’’ by reserving this rule and
relocating the rule governing the Risk
Monitor Mechanism into NOM Rule at
Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(i), entitled
‘‘Market Maker Quotations’’ which
contains similar market maker 3 risk
monitor tools. The Exchange is also
modifying the language currently
contained in Chapter VI, Section 19.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://
www.nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Pursuant to NOM Rules at Chapter VII, Section
5, entitled ‘‘Obligations of Market Makers’’, in
registering as a market maker, an Options
Participant commits himself to various obligations.
Transactions of a NOM Market Maker must
constitute a course of dealings reasonably
calculated to contribute to the maintenance of a fair
and orderly market, and Market Makers should not
make bids or offers or enter into transactions that
are inconsistent with such course of dealings.
Further, all Market Makers are designated as
specialists on NOM for all purposes under the Act
or rules thereunder. See Chapter VII, Section 5.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
68596
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 214 / Thursday, November 5, 2015 / Notices
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the filing is to relocate
and amend the current rule text of the
Risk Monitor Mechanism at Chapter VI,
Section 19.4 The Exchange is proposing
to relocate the rule text into Chapter VII,
Section 6, which currently describes
two other risk mechanisms offered to
NOM Market Makers today.5 Quoting
across many series in an option creates
the possibility of ‘‘rapid fire’’ executions
that can create large, unintended
principal positions that expose NOM
Market Makers, who are required to
continuously quote in assigned options,
to potentially significant market risk.
The Risk Monitor Mechanism
(hereinafter ‘‘Percentage-Based
Threshold’’) permits NOM Market
Makers to monitor risk arising from
multiple executions across multiple
options series of a single underlying
security.
The Exchange will require NOM
Market Makers to utilize either the
Percentage-Based Threshold or the
Volume-Based Threshold.6 The MultiTrigger Threshold will be optional.7
Today, NOM Market Makers are
required to utilize the Percentage-Based
Threshold.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Current Rule Text in Chapter VI, Section
19
NOM Rules at Chapter VI, Section 19
specifically describes the counting
4 The proposed amendments will conform the
rule text to the manner in which the System
operates today.
5 The two risk protections, Volume-Based
Threshold and the Multi-Trigger Threshold, are
NOM Market Maker protections, similar to the Risk
Monitor Mechanism to assist NOM Market Makers
to control their trading risks.
6 The Volume-Based Threshold is offered only to
NOM Market Makers.
7 The Multi-Trigger Threshold is offered only to
NOM Market Makers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Nov 04, 2015
Jkt 238001
program that is maintained by the
System for each Participant in a
particular option. Specifically, the
counting program counts the number of
contracts traded in an option by each
Participant within a specified time
period, not to exceed 15 seconds,
established by each Participant known
in this rule as the ‘‘specified time
period.’’
The specified time period commences
for an option when a transaction occurs
in any series in such option. The
Exchange counts Specialized Quote
Feed (‘‘SQF’’) 8 quotes and OTTO 9
orders only in determining the number
of contracts traded and removed by the
System. When a Participant trades the
Specified Engagement Size during the
specified time period, the PercentageBased Threshold is triggered 10 and the
System automatically removes such
Participant’s quotations from the
Exchange’s orders in all series of the
particular option. The Percentage-Based
Threshold is engaged when the counting
program determines that the Issue
Percentage equals or exceeds a
percentage established by the
Participant, not less than 100%.
The Specified Engagement Size is
automatically offset by a number of
contracts that are executed on the
opposite side of the market in the same
option issue during the specified time
period known as the ‘‘Net Offset
Specified Engagement Size.’’ Long call
positions are only offset by short call
positions, and long put positions are
only offset by short put positions. The
Percentage-Based Threshold is engaged
once the Net Offset Specified
Engagement Size represents a net
number of contracts executed among all
series in an option issue, during the
specified time period, where the issue
percentage is equal to or greater than the
Specified Percentage.11
8 SQF permits the receipt of quotes. SQF Auction
Responses and market sweeps are also not
included.
9 OTTO immediate or cancel orders will not be
included. OTTO provides a method for subscribers
to send orders and receive status updates on those
orders. OTTO accepts limit orders from System
subscribers, and if there is a matching order, the
orders will execute. Non-matching orders are added
to the limit order book, a database of available limit
orders, where they are matched. All NOM
Participants have the ability to utilize OTTO;
although non-NOM Market Makers are
automatically set at a default value. OTTO does not
permit non-NOM Market Makers to adjust the
default setting. NOM Market Makers are able to
adjust the setting.
10 A trigger is defined as the event which causes
the System to automatically remove all quotes and
orders in all options series in an underlying issue.
11 Any marketable orders or quotes that are
executable against a Participant’s disseminated
quotation that are received prior to the time the
Percentage-Based Threshold is engaged are
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The System automatically resets the
counting program and commences a
new specified time period when: (i) A
previous counting period has expired
and a transaction occurs in any series in
such option; or (ii) the Participant
refreshes his/her quotation, in a series
for which an order has been executed
(thus commencing the specified time
period) prior to the expiration of the
specified time period.
Proposed Rule
The Exchange’s amendments to the
current rule text are described below in
greater detail. The Exchange proposes to
amend the current rule to first offer the
Percentage-Based Threshold to NOM
Market Makers only. Today, the
Percentage-Based Threshold is offered
to all Participants. No other market
participants, other than NOM Market
Makers, currently utilize the PercentageBased Threshold today.12 The proposed
term ‘‘NOM Market Maker’’ will be
utilized throughout proposed Chapter
VII, Section 6(f)(i).
Counting Program
Proposed Rule Chapter VII, Section
6(f)(i) provides, as in the current rule,
the Percentage-Based Threshold
determines: (i) The percentage that the
number of contracts executed in that
series represents relative to the Market
Maker’s disseminated 13 size of each
side in that series (‘‘Series Percentage’’);
and (ii) the sum of the Series Percentage
in the option issue (‘‘Issue Percentage’’).
An offset occurs during the PercentageBased Specified Time Period.14 The
Exchange proposes to amend the rule
text in proposed Rule Chapter VII,
Section 6(f)(i) to state that the
Percentage-Based Specified Time Period
operates on a rolling basis among all
series in an option in that there may be
multiple Percentage-Based Specified
Time Periods occurring simultaneously
and such Percentage-Based Specified
automatically executed at the disseminated price up
to the Participant’s disseminated size, regardless of
whether such an execution results in executions in
excess of the Participant’s Specified Engagement
Size. In the event that the specialist’s quote is
removed by the Percentage-Based Threshold and
there are no other Participants quoting in the
particular option, the System will automatically
provide two-sided quotes that comply with the
Exchange’s Rules concerning quote spread
parameters on behalf of the specialist until such
time as the specialist revises the quotation. All
quotations generated by the Exchange on behalf of
a specialist shall be considered ‘‘firm quotations’’
and shall be the obligation of the specialist.
12 The System counts SQF quotes and OTTO
orders. See notes 8 and 9.
13 The disseminated size is the original size
quoted by the Participant.
14 A specified time period is established by the
NOM Market Maker and may not to exceed 15
seconds. See proposed Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(i).
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 214 / Thursday, November 5, 2015 / Notices
Time periods may overlap. The
Exchange proposes to amend the rule
text of proposed Rule Chapter VII,
Section 6(f)(i) to state that the
Percentage-Based Specified Time Period
commences for an option every time an
execution occurs in any series in such
option and continues until the System
removes quotes and orders as described
in current Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(iv),
which is being amended to include the
Percentage-Based Specified Time
Period, or the Percentage-Based
Specified Time Period expires.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Rounding
The Exchange proposes to add
amended rule text to proposed Rule
Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(i) to state that
if the Issue Percentage, rounded to the
nearest integer, equals or exceeds a
percentage established by a Market
Maker, not less than 100% (‘‘Specified
Percentage’’), the System automatically
removes a Market Maker’s quotes in all
series of the underlying security
submitted through designated NOM
protocols, as specified by the Exchange,
during the Percentage-Based Specified
Time Period.15 The current text of
Chapter IV, Section 6 states that the
Percentage-Based Threshold is engaged
when the counting program determines
that the Issue Percentage equals or
exceeds a percentage established by the
Market Maker, not less than 100%. The
Exchange’s proposal adds amended rule
text to proposed Rule Chapter VII,
Section 6(f)(i) to state, that if the Issue
Percentage, rounded to the nearest
integer, equals or exceeds a percentage
established by the Market Maker, not
less than 100% (‘‘Specified
Percentage’’), the System automatically
removes a Market Maker’s quotes and
orders in all series of an underlying
security submitted through designated
NASDAQ protocols, as specified by the
Exchange, during the Percentage-Based
Specified Time Period.
Today, the System tracks and
calculates the net impact of positions in
the same option issue during the
Percentage-Based Specified Time
Period. The System tracks transactions,
i.e., the sum of buy-side put
percentages, the sum of sell-side put
percentages, the sum of buy-side call
percentages, and the sum of sell-side
15 The System’s count of the number of contracts
executed is based on trading interest resting on the
Exchange book. The Volume-Based Specified Time
Period, in current Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(ii),
designated by the NOM Market Maker must be the
same time period as designated for purposes of the
Percentage-Based Threshold. The Exchange
references protocols more specifically in this rule.
The Exchange counts SQF quotes and OTTO orders
only in determining the number of contracts traded
and removed by the System. See notes 8 and 9.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Nov 04, 2015
Jkt 238001
call percentages, and then calculates the
absolute value of the difference between
the buy-side puts and the sell-side puts
plus the absolute value of the difference
between the buy-side calls and the sellside calls. With this proposal, when
these values are rounded, if that number
is greater than the Specified Percentage,
the Percentage-Based Threshold would
be triggered.
Reset
The Exchange proposes to amend the
manner in which the System resets. The
System will automatically remove
quotes and orders in all option series of
an underlying security when the
Percentage-Based Threshold is reached
and then the Percentage-Based Specified
Time Period is reset. The System will
send a Purge Notification Message 16 to
the Market Maker for all affected
options when the threshold has been
reached. Pursuant to this proposal,
when the System removes quotes and
orders as a result of the PercentageBased Threshold, the Market Maker will
be required to send a re-entry indicator
to re-enter the System.17 If a Market
Maker requests the System to remove
quotes and orders in all options series
in an underlying issue, the System will
automatically reset the PercentageBased Specified Time Period(s) and new
Percentage-Based Specified Time
Period(s) will commence for the
Percentage-Based Threshold. With this
proposal, when the System removes
quotes and orders as a result of the
Percentage-Based Threshold, the Market
Maker will be required to send a reentry indicator to re-enter the System.
The proposed rule text adds specificity
to the manner in which the Market
Maker re-enters the market after a
trigger.
Firm Quote
The Exchange represents that its
proposal operates consistently with the
firm quote obligations of a broker-dealer
pursuant to Rule 602 of Regulation
NMS.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 18 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 19
in particular, in that it is designed to
16 A message entitled ‘‘Purge Notification
Message’’ is systemically sent to the NOM Market
Maker upon the removal of quotes and orders due
to the Percentage-Based Threshold. See proposed
Chapter VI, Section 6(f)(iii).
17 The re-entry indicator must be marked as such
to cause the System to reset.
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68597
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest, by
enhancing the risk protections available
to Exchange members. Each of the
proposed amendments do not raise a
novel regulatory issue, rather these
proposed amendments provide for
operational transparency.
The proposed rule text continues to
offer NOM Market Makers a risk
protection tool, in addition to other
available risk tools,20 to decrease risk
and increase stability. The Exchange
offers this risk tool to NOM Market
Makers, in order to encourage them to
provide as much liquidity as possible
and encourage market making generally,
the proposal removes impediments to
and perfects the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market
system and protect investors and the
public interest. Further, it is important
to note that any interest that is
executable against a NOM Market
Maker’s quotes and orders that are
received 21 by the Exchange prior to the
trigger of the Percentage-Based
Threshold, which is processed by the
System, automatically executes at the
price up to the Market Maker’s size.
Further, the Purge Notification Message
is accepted by the System in the order
of receipt in the queue and is processed
in that order so that interest that is
already accepted into the System is
processed prior to the message.
Offering the Risk Tool to Market Makers
The Exchange believes that offering
the risk tool to NOM Market Makers as
compared to all Participants is just and
equitable because quoting across many
series in an option creates the
possibility of ‘‘rapid fire’’ executions
that can create large, unintended
principal positions that expose NOM
Market Makers, who are required to
continuously quote in assigned options,
to potentially significant market risk.
The Percentage-Based Threshold
permits NOM Market Makers to monitor
risk arising from multiple executions
across multiple options series of a single
underlying security. Other NOM
Participants do not bear the burden of
the risk and do not have the obligations
that NOM Market Makers are obligated
by rule to comply with on a continuous
basis.22 Also, NOM Market Makers are
20 See
note 5.
time of receipt for an order or quote is the
time such message is processed by the Exchange
book.
22 See note 3.
21 The
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
68598
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 214 / Thursday, November 5, 2015 / Notices
the only participants that utilize the risk
tool today and therefore no other market
participant is being denied access to this
risk tool.
Counting Program
The Exchange’s amendment to the
operation of the counting program to
describe that it operates on rolling basis,
with a time window after each
transaction, not singular and sequential
time segments is consistent with the Act
because the purpose of the risk tool is
to provide NOM Market Makers with
the ability to monitor its transactions.
The proposed counting program
provides a tracking method for NOM
Market Makers related to the specified
time period. The System captures
information to determine whether a
removal of quotes and orders is
necessary. The proposed function of this
counting program will enable the
Exchange to provide the NOM Market
Maker with information relative to that
NOM Market Maker’s interest currently
at risk in the market.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Rounding
The Exchange’s amendment which
states that if the Issue Percentage,
rounded to the nearest integer, equals or
exceeds the Specified Percentage, the
System automatically removes a Market
Maker’s quotes and orders in all series
of an underlying security is consistent
with the Act because investors will be
protected by providing NOM Market
Makers with a risk tool which allows
NOM Market Makers to properly set
their risk protections at a level that they
are able to meet their obligations and
also manage their risk. This specificity
provides more detail so that NOM
Market Makers may properly set their
risk controls. Understanding the manner
in which the System will round is
important in determining when the
System will trigger a risk control. Also,
today, NOM discusses rounding in its
Rulebook.23 Rounding to the nearest
integer is not novel.
Reset
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
the rule text related to resets provides
guidance to NOM Market Makers as to
the manner in which they may re-enter
the System after a removal of quotes and
orders. This amendment is consistent
with the Act because the Exchange
desires to provide NOM Market Makers
with access to the market at all times.
NOM Market Makers perform an
important function in the marketplace
and the Exchange desires to provide its
23 See NOM Rules at Chapter VII, Section 5
regarding Market Maker allocations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Nov 04, 2015
Jkt 238001
market participants with access to the
market. If the Market Maker is removed
from the market due to a trigger of the
Percentage-Based risk tool, the
Exchange will permit re-entry to the
market provided the Market Maker
sends a re-entry indicator to re-enter the
System. This is important because it
informs the Exchange that the Market
Maker is ready to re-enter the market.
Also, the Exchange currently has risk
mechanisms in place which provide
guidance as to the manner in which a
Market Maker may re-enter the System
after a removal of quotes and orders.24
Quoting Obligations—Market Makers
The Exchange further represents that
the System operates consistently with
the firm quote obligations of a brokerdealer pursuant to Rule 602 of
Regulation NMS. Specifically, with
respect to NOM Market Makers, their
obligation to provide continuous twosided quotes on a daily basis is not
diminished by the removal of such
quotes by the Percentage-Based
Threshold. NOM Market Makers are
required to provide continuous twosided quotes on a daily basis.25 NOM
Market Makers that utilize the
Percentage-Based Threshold will not be
relieved of the obligation to provide
continuous two-sided quotes on a daily
basis, nor will it prohibit the Exchange
from taking disciplinary action against a
Market Maker for failing to meet the
continuous quoting obligation each
trading day.
Finally, the Exchange believes that its
proposal to provide NOM Market
Makers the optionality to either select
the Percentage-Based Threshold or
Volume-Based Threshold as one of their
risk tools will also protect investors and
is consistent with the Act. Today, NOM
Market Makers are required to utilize
the Percentage-Based Threshold. With
this proposal, NOM Market Makers will
have the ability to select their
mandatory risk as between the
Percentage-Based Threshold or VolumeBased Threshold.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Percentage-Based Threshold is meant to
protect NOM Market Makers from
inadvertent exposure to excessive risk.
Accordingly, this proposal will have no
impact on competition. Specifically, the
24 See
25 See
PO 00000
NOM Chapter VI, Section 6(f)(vi).
note 3.
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposal does not impose a burden on
intra-market or inter-market
competition, rather, it provides NOM
Market Makers with the opportunity to
avail themselves of similar risk tools
which are currently available on other
exchanges.26 NOM Market Makers quote
across many series in an option creates
the possibility of ‘‘rapid fire’’ executions
that can create large, unintended
principal positions that expose NOM
Market Makers. The Percentage-Based
Threshold permits NOM Market Makers
to monitor risk arising from multiple
executions across multiple options
series of a single underlying security.
The Exchange is proposing this rule
change to continue to permit NOM
Market Makers to reduce their risk in
the event the Market Maker is suffering
from a system issue or due to the
occurrence of unusual or unexpected
market activity. Reducing such risk will
enable NOM Market Makers to enter
quotations without any fear of
inadvertent exposure to excessive risk,
which in turn will benefit investors
through increased liquidity for the
execution of their orders. Such
increased liquidity benefits investors
because they receive better prices and
because it lowers volatility in the
options market. Reducing risk by
utilizing the proposed risk protections
enables NOM Market Makers,
specifically, to enter quotations with
larger size, which in turn will benefit
investors through increased liquidity for
the execution of their orders. Such
increased liquidity benefits investors
because they receive better prices and
because it lowers volatility in the
options market.
Offering the Risk Tool to Market Makers
The Exchange believes that offering
the risk tool to NOM Market Makers as
compared to all Participants does not
create an undue burden on competition
because other NOM Participants do not
bear the burden of the risk and do not
have the obligations that NOM Market
Makers are obligated by rule to comply
with on a continuous basis.27 Also,
NOM Market Makers are the only
participants that utilize the risk tool
today and therefore no other market
participant is being denied access to this
risk tool.
Counting Program
The Exchange’s amendment to the
operation of the counting program to
describe that it operates on rolling basis,
with a time window after each
transaction, not singular and sequential
26 See
27 See
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
Section 8 of the 19b4.
note 3.
05NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 214 / Thursday, November 5, 2015 / Notices
time segments does not create an undue
burden on competition, rather, it
provides the Market Maker with clarity
as to the manner in which the System
counts quotes and orders and thereby
provides NOM Market Makers with an
increased ability to monitor
transactions.
Rounding
The Exchange’s amendment to add
that if the Issue Percentage, rounded to
the nearest integer, equals or exceeds
the Specified Percentage, the System
automatically removes a Market Maker’s
quotes and orders in all series of an
underlying security does not create an
undue burden on competition because
this amendment also provides the
Market Maker with clarity as to the
manner in which the System will
remove quotes and orders and thereby
provides NOM Market Makers with an
increased ability to monitor transactions
and set risk limits.
Reset
The amendment to the rule text
concerning resetting does not create an
undue burden on competition. The
Exchange proposes to amend the
manner in which a Market Maker may
re-enter the System after a removal of
quotes and orders. This amendment
provides information to NOM Market
Makers as to the procedure to re-enter
the System after a trigger. This
information is intended to provide NOM
Market Makers with access to the
market.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 28 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.29
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
28 15
29 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Nov 04, 2015
Jkt 238001
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved. The
Exchange has provided the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed
rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2015–122 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2015–122. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68599
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2015–122 and should be
submitted on or before November 27,
2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.30
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–28143 Filed 11–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee—New Task
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of a new task assignment
for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee.
AGENCY:
The FAA assigned the
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee (ARAC) a new task to
provide recommendations regarding
occupant protection rulemaking in
normal and transport category rotorcraft
for older certification basis type designs
that are still in production. The FAA
amended regulations to incorporate
occupant protection rules, including
those for emergency landing conditions
and fuel system crash resistance, for
new type designs in the 1980s and
1990s. These rule changes do not apply
to newly manufactured rotorcraft with
older type designs or to derivative type
designs that keep the certification basis
of the original type design. This
approach has resulted in a very low
incorporation rate of occupant
protection features into the rotorcraft
fleet, and fatal accidents remain
unacceptably high. At the end of 2014,
only 16% of U.S. fleet had complied
with the crash resistant fuel system
requirements effective 20 years earlier,
and only 10% had complied with the
emergency landing requirements
effective 25 years earlier. A recent fatal
accident study has shown these
measures would have been effective in
saving lives.
This notice informs the public of the
new ARAC activity and solicits
SUMMARY:
30 17
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
05NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 214 (Thursday, November 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68595-68599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28143]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-76316; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2015-122]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Risk Monitor Mechanism
October 30, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 16, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by NASDAQ.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
NASDAQ proposes to amend Chapter VI, Section 19 entitled ``Risk
Monitor Mechanism'' by reserving this rule and relocating the rule
governing the Risk Monitor Mechanism into NOM Rule at Chapter VII,
Section 6(f)(i), entitled ``Market Maker Quotations'' which contains
similar market maker \3\ risk monitor tools. The Exchange is also
modifying the language currently contained in Chapter VI, Section 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Pursuant to NOM Rules at Chapter VII, Section 5, entitled
``Obligations of Market Makers'', in registering as a market maker,
an Options Participant commits himself to various obligations.
Transactions of a NOM Market Maker must constitute a course of
dealings reasonably calculated to contribute to the maintenance of a
fair and orderly market, and Market Makers should not make bids or
offers or enter into transactions that are inconsistent with such
course of dealings. Further, all Market Makers are designated as
specialists on NOM for all purposes under the Act or rules
thereunder. See Chapter VII, Section 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
[[Page 68596]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the filing is to relocate and amend the current rule
text of the Risk Monitor Mechanism at Chapter VI, Section 19.\4\ The
Exchange is proposing to relocate the rule text into Chapter VII,
Section 6, which currently describes two other risk mechanisms offered
to NOM Market Makers today.\5\ Quoting across many series in an option
creates the possibility of ``rapid fire'' executions that can create
large, unintended principal positions that expose NOM Market Makers,
who are required to continuously quote in assigned options, to
potentially significant market risk. The Risk Monitor Mechanism
(hereinafter ``Percentage-Based Threshold'') permits NOM Market Makers
to monitor risk arising from multiple executions across multiple
options series of a single underlying security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The proposed amendments will conform the rule text to the
manner in which the System operates today.
\5\ The two risk protections, Volume-Based Threshold and the
Multi-Trigger Threshold, are NOM Market Maker protections, similar
to the Risk Monitor Mechanism to assist NOM Market Makers to control
their trading risks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange will require NOM Market Makers to utilize either the
Percentage-Based Threshold or the Volume-Based Threshold.\6\ The Multi-
Trigger Threshold will be optional.\7\ Today, NOM Market Makers are
required to utilize the Percentage-Based Threshold.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Volume-Based Threshold is offered only to NOM Market
Makers.
\7\ The Multi-Trigger Threshold is offered only to NOM Market
Makers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Rule Text in Chapter VI, Section 19
NOM Rules at Chapter VI, Section 19 specifically describes the
counting program that is maintained by the System for each Participant
in a particular option. Specifically, the counting program counts the
number of contracts traded in an option by each Participant within a
specified time period, not to exceed 15 seconds, established by each
Participant known in this rule as the ``specified time period.''
The specified time period commences for an option when a
transaction occurs in any series in such option. The Exchange counts
Specialized Quote Feed (``SQF'') \8\ quotes and OTTO \9\ orders only in
determining the number of contracts traded and removed by the System.
When a Participant trades the Specified Engagement Size during the
specified time period, the Percentage-Based Threshold is triggered \10\
and the System automatically removes such Participant's quotations from
the Exchange's orders in all series of the particular option. The
Percentage-Based Threshold is engaged when the counting program
determines that the Issue Percentage equals or exceeds a percentage
established by the Participant, not less than 100%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ SQF permits the receipt of quotes. SQF Auction Responses and
market sweeps are also not included.
\9\ OTTO immediate or cancel orders will not be included. OTTO
provides a method for subscribers to send orders and receive status
updates on those orders. OTTO accepts limit orders from System
subscribers, and if there is a matching order, the orders will
execute. Non-matching orders are added to the limit order book, a
database of available limit orders, where they are matched. All NOM
Participants have the ability to utilize OTTO; although non-NOM
Market Makers are automatically set at a default value. OTTO does
not permit non-NOM Market Makers to adjust the default setting. NOM
Market Makers are able to adjust the setting.
\10\ A trigger is defined as the event which causes the System
to automatically remove all quotes and orders in all options series
in an underlying issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Specified Engagement Size is automatically offset by a number
of contracts that are executed on the opposite side of the market in
the same option issue during the specified time period known as the
``Net Offset Specified Engagement Size.'' Long call positions are only
offset by short call positions, and long put positions are only offset
by short put positions. The Percentage-Based Threshold is engaged once
the Net Offset Specified Engagement Size represents a net number of
contracts executed among all series in an option issue, during the
specified time period, where the issue percentage is equal to or
greater than the Specified Percentage.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Any marketable orders or quotes that are executable against
a Participant's disseminated quotation that are received prior to
the time the Percentage-Based Threshold is engaged are automatically
executed at the disseminated price up to the Participant's
disseminated size, regardless of whether such an execution results
in executions in excess of the Participant's Specified Engagement
Size. In the event that the specialist's quote is removed by the
Percentage-Based Threshold and there are no other Participants
quoting in the particular option, the System will automatically
provide two-sided quotes that comply with the Exchange's Rules
concerning quote spread parameters on behalf of the specialist until
such time as the specialist revises the quotation. All quotations
generated by the Exchange on behalf of a specialist shall be
considered ``firm quotations'' and shall be the obligation of the
specialist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The System automatically resets the counting program and commences
a new specified time period when: (i) A previous counting period has
expired and a transaction occurs in any series in such option; or (ii)
the Participant refreshes his/her quotation, in a series for which an
order has been executed (thus commencing the specified time period)
prior to the expiration of the specified time period.
Proposed Rule
The Exchange's amendments to the current rule text are described
below in greater detail. The Exchange proposes to amend the current
rule to first offer the Percentage-Based Threshold to NOM Market Makers
only. Today, the Percentage-Based Threshold is offered to all
Participants. No other market participants, other than NOM Market
Makers, currently utilize the Percentage-Based Threshold today.\12\ The
proposed term ``NOM Market Maker'' will be utilized throughout proposed
Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The System counts SQF quotes and OTTO orders. See notes 8
and 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Counting Program
Proposed Rule Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(i) provides, as in the
current rule, the Percentage-Based Threshold determines: (i) The
percentage that the number of contracts executed in that series
represents relative to the Market Maker's disseminated \13\ size of
each side in that series (``Series Percentage''); and (ii) the sum of
the Series Percentage in the option issue (``Issue Percentage''). An
offset occurs during the Percentage-Based Specified Time Period.\14\
The Exchange proposes to amend the rule text in proposed Rule Chapter
VII, Section 6(f)(i) to state that the Percentage-Based Specified Time
Period operates on a rolling basis among all series in an option in
that there may be multiple Percentage-Based Specified Time Periods
occurring simultaneously and such Percentage-Based Specified
[[Page 68597]]
Time periods may overlap. The Exchange proposes to amend the rule text
of proposed Rule Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(i) to state that the
Percentage-Based Specified Time Period commences for an option every
time an execution occurs in any series in such option and continues
until the System removes quotes and orders as described in current
Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(iv), which is being amended to include the
Percentage-Based Specified Time Period, or the Percentage-Based
Specified Time Period expires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The disseminated size is the original size quoted by the
Participant.
\14\ A specified time period is established by the NOM Market
Maker and may not to exceed 15 seconds. See proposed Chapter VII,
Section 6(f)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rounding
The Exchange proposes to add amended rule text to proposed Rule
Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(i) to state that if the Issue Percentage,
rounded to the nearest integer, equals or exceeds a percentage
established by a Market Maker, not less than 100% (``Specified
Percentage''), the System automatically removes a Market Maker's quotes
in all series of the underlying security submitted through designated
NOM protocols, as specified by the Exchange, during the Percentage-
Based Specified Time Period.\15\ The current text of Chapter IV,
Section 6 states that the Percentage-Based Threshold is engaged when
the counting program determines that the Issue Percentage equals or
exceeds a percentage established by the Market Maker, not less than
100%. The Exchange's proposal adds amended rule text to proposed Rule
Chapter VII, Section 6(f)(i) to state, that if the Issue Percentage,
rounded to the nearest integer, equals or exceeds a percentage
established by the Market Maker, not less than 100% (``Specified
Percentage''), the System automatically removes a Market Maker's quotes
and orders in all series of an underlying security submitted through
designated NASDAQ protocols, as specified by the Exchange, during the
Percentage-Based Specified Time Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The System's count of the number of contracts executed is
based on trading interest resting on the Exchange book. The Volume-
Based Specified Time Period, in current Chapter VII, Section
6(f)(ii), designated by the NOM Market Maker must be the same time
period as designated for purposes of the Percentage-Based Threshold.
The Exchange references protocols more specifically in this rule.
The Exchange counts SQF quotes and OTTO orders only in determining
the number of contracts traded and removed by the System. See notes
8 and 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the System tracks and calculates the net impact of positions
in the same option issue during the Percentage-Based Specified Time
Period. The System tracks transactions, i.e., the sum of buy-side put
percentages, the sum of sell-side put percentages, the sum of buy-side
call percentages, and the sum of sell-side call percentages, and then
calculates the absolute value of the difference between the buy-side
puts and the sell-side puts plus the absolute value of the difference
between the buy-side calls and the sell-side calls. With this proposal,
when these values are rounded, if that number is greater than the
Specified Percentage, the Percentage-Based Threshold would be
triggered.
Reset
The Exchange proposes to amend the manner in which the System
resets. The System will automatically remove quotes and orders in all
option series of an underlying security when the Percentage-Based
Threshold is reached and then the Percentage-Based Specified Time
Period is reset. The System will send a Purge Notification Message \16\
to the Market Maker for all affected options when the threshold has
been reached. Pursuant to this proposal, when the System removes quotes
and orders as a result of the Percentage-Based Threshold, the Market
Maker will be required to send a re-entry indicator to re-enter the
System.\17\ If a Market Maker requests the System to remove quotes and
orders in all options series in an underlying issue, the System will
automatically reset the Percentage-Based Specified Time Period(s) and
new Percentage-Based Specified Time Period(s) will commence for the
Percentage-Based Threshold. With this proposal, when the System removes
quotes and orders as a result of the Percentage-Based Threshold, the
Market Maker will be required to send a re-entry indicator to re-enter
the System. The proposed rule text adds specificity to the manner in
which the Market Maker re-enters the market after a trigger.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ A message entitled ``Purge Notification Message'' is
systemically sent to the NOM Market Maker upon the removal of quotes
and orders due to the Percentage-Based Threshold. See proposed
Chapter VI, Section 6(f)(iii).
\17\ The re-entry indicator must be marked as such to cause the
System to reset.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firm Quote
The Exchange represents that its proposal operates consistently
with the firm quote obligations of a broker-dealer pursuant to Rule 602
of Regulation NMS.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \18\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \19\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest, by enhancing the risk protections available to Exchange
members. Each of the proposed amendments do not raise a novel
regulatory issue, rather these proposed amendments provide for
operational transparency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule text continues to offer NOM Market Makers a risk
protection tool, in addition to other available risk tools,\20\ to
decrease risk and increase stability. The Exchange offers this risk
tool to NOM Market Makers, in order to encourage them to provide as
much liquidity as possible and encourage market making generally, the
proposal removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system and protect investors and
the public interest. Further, it is important to note that any interest
that is executable against a NOM Market Maker's quotes and orders that
are received \21\ by the Exchange prior to the trigger of the
Percentage-Based Threshold, which is processed by the System,
automatically executes at the price up to the Market Maker's size.
Further, the Purge Notification Message is accepted by the System in
the order of receipt in the queue and is processed in that order so
that interest that is already accepted into the System is processed
prior to the message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See note 5.
\21\ The time of receipt for an order or quote is the time such
message is processed by the Exchange book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Offering the Risk Tool to Market Makers
The Exchange believes that offering the risk tool to NOM Market
Makers as compared to all Participants is just and equitable because
quoting across many series in an option creates the possibility of
``rapid fire'' executions that can create large, unintended principal
positions that expose NOM Market Makers, who are required to
continuously quote in assigned options, to potentially significant
market risk. The Percentage-Based Threshold permits NOM Market Makers
to monitor risk arising from multiple executions across multiple
options series of a single underlying security. Other NOM Participants
do not bear the burden of the risk and do not have the obligations that
NOM Market Makers are obligated by rule to comply with on a continuous
basis.\22\ Also, NOM Market Makers are
[[Page 68598]]
the only participants that utilize the risk tool today and therefore no
other market participant is being denied access to this risk tool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Counting Program
The Exchange's amendment to the operation of the counting program
to describe that it operates on rolling basis, with a time window after
each transaction, not singular and sequential time segments is
consistent with the Act because the purpose of the risk tool is to
provide NOM Market Makers with the ability to monitor its transactions.
The proposed counting program provides a tracking method for NOM Market
Makers related to the specified time period. The System captures
information to determine whether a removal of quotes and orders is
necessary. The proposed function of this counting program will enable
the Exchange to provide the NOM Market Maker with information relative
to that NOM Market Maker's interest currently at risk in the market.
Rounding
The Exchange's amendment which states that if the Issue Percentage,
rounded to the nearest integer, equals or exceeds the Specified
Percentage, the System automatically removes a Market Maker's quotes
and orders in all series of an underlying security is consistent with
the Act because investors will be protected by providing NOM Market
Makers with a risk tool which allows NOM Market Makers to properly set
their risk protections at a level that they are able to meet their
obligations and also manage their risk. This specificity provides more
detail so that NOM Market Makers may properly set their risk controls.
Understanding the manner in which the System will round is important in
determining when the System will trigger a risk control. Also, today,
NOM discusses rounding in its Rulebook.\23\ Rounding to the nearest
integer is not novel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See NOM Rules at Chapter VII, Section 5 regarding Market
Maker allocations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reset
The Exchange's proposal to amend the rule text related to resets
provides guidance to NOM Market Makers as to the manner in which they
may re-enter the System after a removal of quotes and orders. This
amendment is consistent with the Act because the Exchange desires to
provide NOM Market Makers with access to the market at all times. NOM
Market Makers perform an important function in the marketplace and the
Exchange desires to provide its market participants with access to the
market. If the Market Maker is removed from the market due to a trigger
of the Percentage-Based risk tool, the Exchange will permit re-entry to
the market provided the Market Maker sends a re-entry indicator to re-
enter the System. This is important because it informs the Exchange
that the Market Maker is ready to re-enter the market. Also, the
Exchange currently has risk mechanisms in place which provide guidance
as to the manner in which a Market Maker may re-enter the System after
a removal of quotes and orders.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See NOM Chapter VI, Section 6(f)(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoting Obligations--Market Makers
The Exchange further represents that the System operates
consistently with the firm quote obligations of a broker-dealer
pursuant to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS. Specifically, with respect to
NOM Market Makers, their obligation to provide continuous two-sided
quotes on a daily basis is not diminished by the removal of such quotes
by the Percentage-Based Threshold. NOM Market Makers are required to
provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily basis.\25\ NOM Market
Makers that utilize the Percentage-Based Threshold will not be relieved
of the obligation to provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily
basis, nor will it prohibit the Exchange from taking disciplinary
action against a Market Maker for failing to meet the continuous
quoting obligation each trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange believes that its proposal to provide NOM
Market Makers the optionality to either select the Percentage-Based
Threshold or Volume-Based Threshold as one of their risk tools will
also protect investors and is consistent with the Act. Today, NOM
Market Makers are required to utilize the Percentage-Based Threshold.
With this proposal, NOM Market Makers will have the ability to select
their mandatory risk as between the Percentage-Based Threshold or
Volume-Based Threshold.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Percentage-Based Threshold
is meant to protect NOM Market Makers from inadvertent exposure to
excessive risk. Accordingly, this proposal will have no impact on
competition. Specifically, the proposal does not impose a burden on
intra-market or inter-market competition, rather, it provides NOM
Market Makers with the opportunity to avail themselves of similar risk
tools which are currently available on other exchanges.\26\ NOM Market
Makers quote across many series in an option creates the possibility of
``rapid fire'' executions that can create large, unintended principal
positions that expose NOM Market Makers. The Percentage-Based Threshold
permits NOM Market Makers to monitor risk arising from multiple
executions across multiple options series of a single underlying
security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Section 8 of the 19b4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is proposing this rule change to continue to permit
NOM Market Makers to reduce their risk in the event the Market Maker is
suffering from a system issue or due to the occurrence of unusual or
unexpected market activity. Reducing such risk will enable NOM Market
Makers to enter quotations without any fear of inadvertent exposure to
excessive risk, which in turn will benefit investors through increased
liquidity for the execution of their orders. Such increased liquidity
benefits investors because they receive better prices and because it
lowers volatility in the options market. Reducing risk by utilizing the
proposed risk protections enables NOM Market Makers, specifically, to
enter quotations with larger size, which in turn will benefit investors
through increased liquidity for the execution of their orders. Such
increased liquidity benefits investors because they receive better
prices and because it lowers volatility in the options market.
Offering the Risk Tool to Market Makers
The Exchange believes that offering the risk tool to NOM Market
Makers as compared to all Participants does not create an undue burden
on competition because other NOM Participants do not bear the burden of
the risk and do not have the obligations that NOM Market Makers are
obligated by rule to comply with on a continuous basis.\27\ Also, NOM
Market Makers are the only participants that utilize the risk tool
today and therefore no other market participant is being denied access
to this risk tool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Counting Program
The Exchange's amendment to the operation of the counting program
to describe that it operates on rolling basis, with a time window after
each transaction, not singular and sequential
[[Page 68599]]
time segments does not create an undue burden on competition, rather,
it provides the Market Maker with clarity as to the manner in which the
System counts quotes and orders and thereby provides NOM Market Makers
with an increased ability to monitor transactions.
Rounding
The Exchange's amendment to add that if the Issue Percentage,
rounded to the nearest integer, equals or exceeds the Specified
Percentage, the System automatically removes a Market Maker's quotes
and orders in all series of an underlying security does not create an
undue burden on competition because this amendment also provides the
Market Maker with clarity as to the manner in which the System will
remove quotes and orders and thereby provides NOM Market Makers with an
increased ability to monitor transactions and set risk limits.
Reset
The amendment to the rule text concerning resetting does not create
an undue burden on competition. The Exchange proposes to amend the
manner in which a Market Maker may re-enter the System after a removal
of quotes and orders. This amendment provides information to NOM Market
Makers as to the procedure to re-enter the System after a trigger. This
information is intended to provide NOM Market Makers with access to the
market.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \28\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii).
\29\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. The Exchange has
provided the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-122 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-122. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-122 and should
be submitted on or before November 27, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-28143 Filed 11-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P