Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 123D-Equities To Specify That Exchange Systems May Open One or More Securities Electronically if a Designated Market Maker Registered in a Security or Securities Cannot Facilitate the Opening of Trading as Required by Exchange Rules, 67830-67833 [2015-27909]
Download as PDF
67830
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 212 / Tuesday, November 3, 2015 / Notices
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of NSCC and on DTCC’s Web site
(https://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rulefilings.aspx). All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NSCC–
2015–008 and should be submitted on
or before November 24, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–27912 Filed 11–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–76292; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2015–81]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending Rule 123D—
Equities To Specify That Exchange
Systems May Open One or More
Securities Electronically if a
Designated Market Maker Registered in
a Security or Securities Cannot
Facilitate the Opening of Trading as
Required by Exchange Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
October 28, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
23, 2015, NYSE MKT LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123D—Equities to specify that
Exchange systems may open one or
more securities electronically if a
Designated Market Maker registered in a
security or securities cannot facilitate
the opening of trading as required by
Exchange rules. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123D—Equities (‘‘Rule 123D’’) to
specify that Exchange systems may open
one or more securities electronically if
a Designated Market Maker (‘‘DMM’’)
registered in a security or securities
cannot facilitate the open of trading as
required by Exchange rules.3
Currently, Rule 123D provides that
openings may be effected manually or
electronically. However, the current rule
contemplates that openings would be
facilitated by a DMM, as provided for in
Rule 104(a)(2)—Equities. The Exchange
proposes to re-number Rule 123D to
provide that current Rule 123D(1)
would be re-numbered as Rule 123D(a),
and the heading would be amended to
3 The proposed amendment contemplates that a
DMM’s inability to open securities either manually
or electronically would be related to business
continuity disruptions such as the physical closing
of the Exchange Trading Floor or equipment and
connectivity breakdowns that prevent the DMM
from opening a security either manually or
electronically. When a DMM is unable to open
securities manually or electronically, the DMM’s
affirmative obligations under Rule 104 would not
apply.
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be referred to as ‘‘Openings.’’ 4 Proposed
Rule 123D(a)(1) would include the
current first paragraph of Rule 123D(1).
The Exchange proposes to add a new
paragraph (a)(2) to Rule 123D to provide
that, if a DMM cannot facilitate the open
of trading for one or more securities for
which the DMM is registered, the
Exchange would open those securities
electronically on a quote or a trade as
provided for in paragraphs (a)(3)—(a)(6)
of the proposed Rule. Proposed Rule
123D(a)(2) would further provide that
manually-entered Floor interest would
not participate in any open effected
electronically by the Exchange and if
previously entered, would be ignored.
Finally, proposed Rule 123D(a)(2)
would provide that, unless otherwise
specified, references to an open or
opening in proposed Rules 123D (a)(3)—
(a)(6) would also mean a reopening
following a trading halt or pause.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3) would
specify when the Exchange would open
a security on a trade and would provide
that the Exchange would open a security
on a trade if there is buy and sell
interest that can trade a round lot or
more at a price that is no greater than
or no less than a specified range
(‘‘Opening Price Range’’) away from the
last sale price on the Exchange
(‘‘Reference Price’’). Proposed Rule
123D(a)(3) would further provide that
the Exchange would determine the
Opening Price Range parameters upon
advance notice to market participants.
Unlike DMMs, who have the
obligation to trade for their own account
to supply liquidity as needed to
facilitate openings,5 the Exchange
would not supply any liquidity when
effecting an electronic open. Without
the addition of liquidity to offset an
imbalance, pricing the opening based on
a significant imbalance could result in
an opening price that may not be
reasonably related to the last sale price
on the Exchange. To avoid opening a
security at a price too far away from the
last sale, the Exchange proposes to
establish numerical guidelines to
provide parameters regarding the price
a security may open when the Exchange
opens such security on a trade. The
Exchange proposes to establish the
4 The Exchange would also delete the terms
‘‘Delayed’’ and ‘‘Halts in trading’’ from the current
Rule 123D(1) heading. The Exchange further
proposes to add a new sub-paragraph (b) to Rule
123D, before the current second paragraph of Rule
123D(1), which would be named ‘‘Delayed
Openings/Halts in Trading.’’ The Exchange
proposes further non-substantive amendments to renumber current Rule 123D(2) as 123D(c). As
discussed below, the Exchange proposes to delete
current Rule 123D(3) and (4).
5 See Rule 104(a)(2)—Equities & 104(f)(ii)—
Equities.
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 212 / Tuesday, November 3, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Opening Price Range parameters from
time to time upon advance notice to
market participants, which is similar to
how other markets function.6
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(A)—(C)
would specify how orders would
participate if the Exchange opens a
security on a trade. Proposed Rule
123D(a)(3)(A) would provide that if all
interest guaranteed to participate in an
opening trade under Rule 115A(b) 7
could trade at a price consistent with
the Opening Price Range, the opening
trade would be at the price at which all
such interest could trade. Proposed Rule
123D(a)(3)(B) would provide that if
there are only Market Orders on both
sides of the market, the opening price
would be the Reference Price.
Because the Exchange would open a
security within specified guidelines, not
all interest that is intended for the open
may participate in such an open.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C) would
therefore provide that if interest that is
otherwise guaranteed to participate in
an opening trade under Rule 115A(b)—
Equities would cause an opening price
to be outside the Opening Price Range,
such interest would not be guaranteed
to participate in the opening trade. In
that case, the Exchange proposes that
the opening trade would be at the price
at which the maximum volume of
shares is tradable that is closest to the
Reference Price and that orders would
be allocated in the following priority,
6 See, e.g., Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’)
Rule 4752(b)[sic](2)(E) (Nasdaq management sets
and modifies benchmarks and thresholds for the
Nasdaq Opening Cross from time to time upon prior
notice to market participants); NYSE Arca Equities,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’) Rule 1.1(s)(A) (NYSE
Arca Equities sets and modifiers price collar
thresholds for the Market Order Auction from time
to time upon prior notice to ETP Holders).
7 Rule 115A(b)—Equities provides that when
arranging an opening or reopening price, except as
provided for in Rule 115A(b)(2)—Equities which
concerns opening a security on a quote, market
interest would be guaranteed to participate in the
opening or reopening transaction and have
precedence over limit interest that is priced equal
to the opening or reopening price of a security and
DMM interest. For purposes of the opening or
reopening transaction, market interest includes (1)
market and Market on Open (‘‘MOO’’) orders, (2)
tick-sensitive market and MOO orders to buy (sell)
that are priced higher (lower) than the opening or
reopening price, (3) limit interest to buy (sell) that
is priced higher (lower) than the opening or
reopening price, and (iv) Floor broker interest
entered manually by the DMM. See Rule
115A(b)(1)(A)—Equities. For purposes of the
opening or reopening transaction, limit interest
would include (2) limited-priced interest,
including—Quotes, Limit on Open (‘‘LOO’’) orders,
and G orders; and (ii) tick-sensitive market and
MOO orders that are priced equal to the opening
or reopening price of a security. See Rule
115A(b)(1)(C)—Equities. In addition, G orders that
are priced equal to the opening or reopening price
of a security would yield to all other limit interest
priced equal to the opening or reopening price of
a security except DMM interest.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
which is based on the priority of orders
set forth in Rule 115A(b)—Equities:
• Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(i)
would provide that Market and Marketon-Open (‘‘MOO’’) orders would trade
first in time priority, provided that,
during a Short Sale Period, sell short
market orders and MOO orders would
be adjusted to a Permitted Price 8 and
would be considered limit orders for
purposes of determining allocation
priority.
• Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(ii)
would provide that Stop Orders that
would be elected based on the opening
price would trade second in time
priority. As further proposed, during a
Short Sale Period, sell short Stop Orders
that are priced to a Permitted Price that
would be lower than the opening price
would trade after all other Stop Orders
and before all other interest priced equal
to or lower than the opening price.
• Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(iii)
would provide that Limit Orders
(including Reserve Orders) to buy (sell)
and e-Quotes (including Reserve eQuotes) to buy (sell) priced higher
(lower) than the opening price would
trade third on parity by agent under
Rule 72(c)—Equities.9
• Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(iv)
would provide that G-quotes 10 to buy
(sell) priced higher (lower) than the
opening price will trade fourth on parity
by agent under Rule 72(c)—Equities.
• Finally, proposed Rule
123D(a)(3)(C)(v) would provide that all
8 As set forth in Rule 440B—Equities, a short sale
price test is activated if the price of a listed security
declines by 10% or more from the previous day’s
last sale on the listing market and continues
through the end of the following trading day (the
‘‘Short Sale Period’’). Pursuant to Rule 440B(e)—
Equities, Exchange systems will re-price short sale
orders that are limited to the current national best
bid (‘‘NBB’’) or lower and short sale market orders
by one minimum price increment above the NBB
(the ‘‘Permitted Price’’). The Permitted Price for
securities for which the NBB is $1 or more is $.01
above the NBB; the Permitted Price for securities for
which the NBB is below $1 is $.0001 above the
NBB.
9 Rule 72(c)—Equities describes the allocation of
executions on the Exchange and Rule 72(c)(ii)—
Equities provides that for purposes of share
allocation in an execution, each single Floor broker,
the DMM and orders collectively represented in
Exchange systems shall constitute individual
participants. Rule 72(c)(iv)—Equities provides that
executed volume shall be allocated to each
participant on parity.
10 Section 11(a)(1) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1),
generally prohibits a member of a national
securities exchange from effecting transactions on
that exchange for its own account, the account of
an associated person, or any account over which it
or an associated person exercises discretion.
Subsection (G) of Section 11(a)(1) provides an
exemption allowing an exchange member to have
its own floor broker execute a proprietary
transaction (‘‘G order’’). A G-Quote is an electronic
method for Floor brokers to represent G orders. G
orders on NYSE yield priority, parity and
precedence based on size to all other non-G orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67831
other limit interest that is priced equal
to the opening price will trade last and
be allocated consistent with Rule
115A(b)(1)—Equities.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(4) would
describe when the Exchange would
open a security electronically on a
quote. First, proposed Rule
123D(a)(4)(A) would provide that if
interest of less than a round lot pairs off
at a price within the Opening Price
Range, the Exchange would open on a
quote. In this circumstance, after
opening on a quote, interest of less than
a round lot would trade at the price
closest to the Reference Price (or at the
Reference Price if the only interest is
market orders), but would not be
reported as an opening trade.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(4)(B) would
provide that the Exchange would open
a security electronically on a quote if
interest of any size pairs off at a price
below (above) the lower (upper)
boundary of the Opening Price Range, in
which case, such paired-off interest
would not trade.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(4)(C) would
provide that the Exchange would open
a security electronically on a quote if
there is no interest that can be quoted
on either or both sides of the market.
The proposed Rule would further
specify that if an opening quote has a
zero bid and/or a zero offer, it would not
constitute an ‘‘Opening Price’’ as
defined in Section I(I) of the Regulation
NMS Plan to Address Extraordinary
Market Volatility (the ‘‘Plan’’).11
Accordingly, if the Exchange were to
open on a quote with a zero bid and/or
a zero offer, it would not calculate a
midpoint of the quote for purposes of
calculating Price Bands as provided for
in Section V(B)(1) of the Plan.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(5) would
specify which information would be
provided in advance of an opening or
reopening. In order to provide
transparency regarding the opening
process, the Exchange proposes that
during an opening effected by the
Exchange, Order Imbalance Information
pursuant to Rule 15(c)—Equities would
be published.12 However, because the
11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091,
77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (File No. 4–631).
12 Order Imbalance Information reflects real-time
order imbalances that accumulate prior to the
opening transaction on the Exchange and the price
at which interest eligible to participate in the
opening transaction may be executed in full. Order
Imbalance Information disseminated pursuant to
Rule 15(c)—Equities includes all interest eligible for
execution in the opening transaction of the security
in Exchange systems, i.e., electronic interest,
including Floor broker electronic interest, entered
into Exchange systems prior to the opening. Order
Imbalance Information is disseminated on the
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
Continued
03NON1
67832
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 212 / Tuesday, November 3, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Exchange would not open a security at
a price outside of specified ranges, the
Exchange would not issue pre-opening
indications in a security pursuant to
either Rule 15(a)—Equities or 123D.13
The Exchange further proposes that it
would publish pre-opening indications
pursuant to Rule 123D(b) for a reopening following a regulatory halt.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(6) would
describe under which circumstances the
Exchange would cancel orders after
opening on a trade or quote. A proposed
in new Rule 123D(a)(6)(A), all
unexecuted Market Orders, MOO
Orders, and LOO Orders would be
cancelled. This would be new behavior
following an Exchange-facilitated open
because under a DMM-facilitated open,
all Market and MOO Orders are
guaranteed to participate and therefore
there would not be any unexecuted
Market Orders or MOO Orders following
an opening. Proposed Rule
123D(a)(6)(B) would provide that after
an opening on a trade, buy (sell) Limit
Orders priced higher (lower) than the
opening price would be cancelled.
Lastly, proposed Rule 123D(a)(6)(C)
would provide that if interest would
have paired off at a price below (above)
the lower (upper) boundary of the
Opening Price Range, after opening on
a quote, sell (buy) Limit Orders would
be cancelled. The Exchange proposes to
cancel only the side of the orders that
would cause an opening price to be
outside of the Opening Price Range
parameters; the other side would not be
cancelled and would be included in the
opening quote.
The Exchange also proposes to delete
current Rule 123D(4), which sets forth a
non-regulatory trading halt condition
designated ‘‘Structured Products.’’ Rule
123D(4) was adopted to permit the
halting of trading of exchange traded
funds (‘‘ETFs’’) and structured products
on the Exchange to facilitate the closing
of the Exchange’s former trading floor in
connection with the acquisition of the
Exchange by NYSE Euronext in 2008.
Orders in ETFs and structured products
subject to the trading halt condition are
Exchange’s proprietary data feeds. See Rule
15(c)(1)—Equities.
13 See Proposed Rule 123D(a)(2) (F) [sic]. Rule
123D(1) requires the dissemination of one or more
indications in connection with any delayed opening
where a security has not opened or been quoted by
10 a.m. In addition, Rule 123D(1) provides that
dissemination of one or more indication is
mandatory for an opening which will result in a
‘‘significant’’ price change from the previous close.
For securities priced under $10, such indications
are mandatory if the price change is one dollar of
more; for securities between $10 and $99.99,
indications are required for price movements of the
lesser of 10% or three dollars; and for securities
over $100, indications are required for price
movements of five dollars or more.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
routed from the Exchange to its affiliate
NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’).14 The
condition permits the Exchange to halt
ETFs or structured products that remain
listed on the Exchange.15 All Exchangelisted ETFs and structured products
have transferred to NYSE Arca and are
no longer traded on the Exchange,
rendering Rule 123D(4) moot.16
Because of the technology changes
associated with the proposed rule
change, the Exchange proposes to
announce the implementation date via
Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,17 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,18 in particular, because it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that permitting the Exchange to
electronically open trading would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system by
ensuring an orderly open if the
registered DMM cannot manually or
electronically facilitate the open of
trading as required under Rule 104(a).
Similarly, the proposal promotes just
and equitable principles of trade and
removes impediments to and perfects
the mechanism of a free and open
market by providing customers and the
investing public with the certainty of an
open in circumstances where business
continuity disruptions or other
emergencies would prevent the assigned
DMMs from opening a security. For the
same reasons, the proposal is also
designed to protect investors as well as
the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed amendment to Rule 123D(a)(3)
to provide that openings effected by the
Exchange would be within a proposed
numerical guideline would remove
14 See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58824
(October 21, 2008), 73 FR 63754 (October 27, 2008)
(SR–NYSEALTR–2008–02). See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 58705 (October 1, 2008),
73 FR 58995 (October 8, 2008) (SR–Amex–2008–
63).
15 See id.
16 The Exchange also proposes to amend current
Rule 123D(2) to replace single quotation marks with
double quotation marks around the term
‘‘Equipment Changeover’’ and to delete current
Rule 123D(3), which is marked ‘‘Reserved.’’
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
because, similar to how Nasdaq and
NYSE Arca Equities function, it would
enable the Exchange to set parameters
for an opening to assure that the
potential prices that a security may
open would not be significantly away
from the Reference Price. Similarly, the
Exchange believes that excluding
interest eligible for the open that would
cause an execution to occur outside the
Opening Price Range parameters, even if
such interest would otherwise be
required to be included in an open
effected by a DMM, would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a fair and orderly market
because it would assure that the
Exchange could effect the open within
the proposed specified price ranges. The
proposed rule therefore promotes just
and equitable principles of trade
because it provides transparency to
entering firms of whether interest would
be eligible to participate in a closing
transaction effected by the Exchange.
Finally, deleting an obsolete halt
condition in Rule 123D(4) removes
impediments to and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market by
removing confusion that may result
from having obsolete references in the
Exchange’s rulebook. The Exchange
further believes that the proposal
removes impediments to and perfects
the mechanism of a free and open
market by ensuring that persons subject
to the Exchange’s jurisdiction,
regulators, and the investing public, can
more easily navigate and understand the
Exchange’s rulebook. The Exchange
believes that eliminating obsolete
references would not be inconsistent
with the public interest and the
protection of investors because investors
will not be harmed and in fact would
benefit from increased transparency,
thereby reducing potential confusion.
Removing such obsolete references will
also further the goal of transparency and
add clarity to the Exchange’s rules.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but rather
enable the Exchange to open trading
where circumstances would prevent a
DMM from facilitating an open.
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 212 / Tuesday, November 3, 2015 / Notices
Electronic Comments
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 19 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.20 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 21 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),22 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 23 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV.Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
20 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
21 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
22 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
23 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
18:04 Nov 02, 2015
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2015–81. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should referto File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2015–81, and should be
submitted on or before November 24,
2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–27909 Filed 11–2–15; 8:45 am]
19 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2015–81 on the subject line.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
67833
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
Order of Suspension of Trading; In the
Matter of American Power Corp. and
Locan, Inc.
October 30, 2015.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of American
Power Corp. (CIK No. 1436174), a
revoked Nevada corporation with its
principal place of business listed as
Denver, Colorado, with stock quoted on
OTC Link (previously, ‘‘Pink Sheets’’)
operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc.
(‘‘OTC Link’’) under the ticker symbol
AMPW, because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
December 31, 2012. On October 22,
2014, the Division of Corporation
Finance sent American Power a
delinquency letter requesting
compliance with their periodic filing
obligations, but the letter was returned
because of American Power’s failure to
maintain a valid address on file with the
Commission, as required by
Commission rules (Rule 301 of
Regulation S–T, 17 CFR 232.301 and
Section 5.4 of EDGAR Filer Manual).
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Locan, Inc.
(CIK No. 1431837), a delinquent
Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business listed as Bartlesville,
Oklahoma, with stock quoted on OTC
Link under the ticker symbol LOCN,
because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended
December 31, 2012. On October 27,
2014, Locan received a delinquency
letter sent by the Division of
Corporation Finance requesting
compliance with their periodic filing
obligations.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
companies.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies
is suspended for the period from 9:30
a.m. EDT on October 30, 2015, through
11:59 p.m. EST on November 12, 2015.
By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–28065 Filed 10–30–15; 4:15 pm]
24 17
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 212 (Tuesday, November 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67830-67833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27909]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-76292; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2015-81]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 123D--
Equities To Specify That Exchange Systems May Open One or More
Securities Electronically if a Designated Market Maker Registered in a
Security or Securities Cannot Facilitate the Opening of Trading as
Required by Exchange Rules
October 28, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 23, 2015, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE MKT'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123D--Equities to specify that
Exchange systems may open one or more securities electronically if a
Designated Market Maker registered in a security or securities cannot
facilitate the opening of trading as required by Exchange rules. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123D--Equities (``Rule 123D'')
to specify that Exchange systems may open one or more securities
electronically if a Designated Market Maker (``DMM'') registered in a
security or securities cannot facilitate the open of trading as
required by Exchange rules.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The proposed amendment contemplates that a DMM's inability
to open securities either manually or electronically would be
related to business continuity disruptions such as the physical
closing of the Exchange Trading Floor or equipment and connectivity
breakdowns that prevent the DMM from opening a security either
manually or electronically. When a DMM is unable to open securities
manually or electronically, the DMM's affirmative obligations under
Rule 104 would not apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, Rule 123D provides that openings may be effected
manually or electronically. However, the current rule contemplates that
openings would be facilitated by a DMM, as provided for in Rule
104(a)(2)--Equities. The Exchange proposes to re-number Rule 123D to
provide that current Rule 123D(1) would be re-numbered as Rule 123D(a),
and the heading would be amended to be referred to as ``Openings.'' \4\
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(1) would include the current first paragraph of
Rule 123D(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange would also delete the terms ``Delayed'' and
``Halts in trading'' from the current Rule 123D(1) heading. The
Exchange further proposes to add a new sub-paragraph (b) to Rule
123D, before the current second paragraph of Rule 123D(1), which
would be named ``Delayed Openings/Halts in Trading.'' The Exchange
proposes further non-substantive amendments to re-number current
Rule 123D(2) as 123D(c). As discussed below, the Exchange proposes
to delete current Rule 123D(3) and (4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to add a new paragraph (a)(2) to Rule 123D to
provide that, if a DMM cannot facilitate the open of trading for one or
more securities for which the DMM is registered, the Exchange would
open those securities electronically on a quote or a trade as provided
for in paragraphs (a)(3)--(a)(6) of the proposed Rule. Proposed Rule
123D(a)(2) would further provide that manually-entered Floor interest
would not participate in any open effected electronically by the
Exchange and if previously entered, would be ignored. Finally, proposed
Rule 123D(a)(2) would provide that, unless otherwise specified,
references to an open or opening in proposed Rules 123D (a)(3)--(a)(6)
would also mean a reopening following a trading halt or pause.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3) would specify when the Exchange would open
a security on a trade and would provide that the Exchange would open a
security on a trade if there is buy and sell interest that can trade a
round lot or more at a price that is no greater than or no less than a
specified range (``Opening Price Range'') away from the last sale price
on the Exchange (``Reference Price''). Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3) would
further provide that the Exchange would determine the Opening Price
Range parameters upon advance notice to market participants.
Unlike DMMs, who have the obligation to trade for their own account
to supply liquidity as needed to facilitate openings,\5\ the Exchange
would not supply any liquidity when effecting an electronic open.
Without the addition of liquidity to offset an imbalance, pricing the
opening based on a significant imbalance could result in an opening
price that may not be reasonably related to the last sale price on the
Exchange. To avoid opening a security at a price too far away from the
last sale, the Exchange proposes to establish numerical guidelines to
provide parameters regarding the price a security may open when the
Exchange opens such security on a trade. The Exchange proposes to
establish the
[[Page 67831]]
Opening Price Range parameters from time to time upon advance notice to
market participants, which is similar to how other markets function.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Rule 104(a)(2)--Equities & 104(f)(ii)--Equities.
\6\ See, e.g., Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') Rule
4752(b)[sic](2)(E) (Nasdaq management sets and modifies benchmarks
and thresholds for the Nasdaq Opening Cross from time to time upon
prior notice to market participants); NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.
(``NYSE Arca Equities'') Rule 1.1(s)(A) (NYSE Arca Equities sets and
modifiers price collar thresholds for the Market Order Auction from
time to time upon prior notice to ETP Holders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(A)--(C) would specify how orders would
participate if the Exchange opens a security on a trade. Proposed Rule
123D(a)(3)(A) would provide that if all interest guaranteed to
participate in an opening trade under Rule 115A(b) \7\ could trade at a
price consistent with the Opening Price Range, the opening trade would
be at the price at which all such interest could trade. Proposed Rule
123D(a)(3)(B) would provide that if there are only Market Orders on
both sides of the market, the opening price would be the Reference
Price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Rule 115A(b)--Equities provides that when arranging an
opening or reopening price, except as provided for in Rule
115A(b)(2)--Equities which concerns opening a security on a quote,
market interest would be guaranteed to participate in the opening or
reopening transaction and have precedence over limit interest that
is priced equal to the opening or reopening price of a security and
DMM interest. For purposes of the opening or reopening transaction,
market interest includes (1) market and Market on Open (``MOO'')
orders, (2) tick-sensitive market and MOO orders to buy (sell) that
are priced higher (lower) than the opening or reopening price, (3)
limit interest to buy (sell) that is priced higher (lower) than the
opening or reopening price, and (iv) Floor broker interest entered
manually by the DMM. See Rule 115A(b)(1)(A)--Equities. For purposes
of the opening or reopening transaction, limit interest would
include (2) limited-priced interest, including--Quotes, Limit on
Open (``LOO'') orders, and G orders; and (ii) tick-sensitive market
and MOO orders that are priced equal to the opening or reopening
price of a security. See Rule 115A(b)(1)(C)--Equities. In addition,
G orders that are priced equal to the opening or reopening price of
a security would yield to all other limit interest priced equal to
the opening or reopening price of a security except DMM interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the Exchange would open a security within specified
guidelines, not all interest that is intended for the open may
participate in such an open. Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C) would
therefore provide that if interest that is otherwise guaranteed to
participate in an opening trade under Rule 115A(b)--Equities would
cause an opening price to be outside the Opening Price Range, such
interest would not be guaranteed to participate in the opening trade.
In that case, the Exchange proposes that the opening trade would be at
the price at which the maximum volume of shares is tradable that is
closest to the Reference Price and that orders would be allocated in
the following priority, which is based on the priority of orders set
forth in Rule 115A(b)--Equities:
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(i) would provide that Market
and Market-on-Open (``MOO'') orders would trade first in time priority,
provided that, during a Short Sale Period, sell short market orders and
MOO orders would be adjusted to a Permitted Price \8\ and would be
considered limit orders for purposes of determining allocation
priority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ As set forth in Rule 440B--Equities, a short sale price test
is activated if the price of a listed security declines by 10% or
more from the previous day's last sale on the listing market and
continues through the end of the following trading day (the ``Short
Sale Period''). Pursuant to Rule 440B(e)--Equities, Exchange systems
will re-price short sale orders that are limited to the current
national best bid (``NBB'') or lower and short sale market orders by
one minimum price increment above the NBB (the ``Permitted Price'').
The Permitted Price for securities for which the NBB is $1 or more
is $.01 above the NBB; the Permitted Price for securities for which
the NBB is below $1 is $.0001 above the NBB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(ii) would provide that Stop
Orders that would be elected based on the opening price would trade
second in time priority. As further proposed, during a Short Sale
Period, sell short Stop Orders that are priced to a Permitted Price
that would be lower than the opening price would trade after all other
Stop Orders and before all other interest priced equal to or lower than
the opening price.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(iii) would provide that Limit
Orders (including Reserve Orders) to buy (sell) and e-Quotes (including
Reserve e-Quotes) to buy (sell) priced higher (lower) than the opening
price would trade third on parity by agent under Rule 72(c)--
Equities.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Rule 72(c)--Equities describes the allocation of executions
on the Exchange and Rule 72(c)(ii)--Equities provides that for
purposes of share allocation in an execution, each single Floor
broker, the DMM and orders collectively represented in Exchange
systems shall constitute individual participants. Rule 72(c)(iv)--
Equities provides that executed volume shall be allocated to each
participant on parity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(iv) would provide that G-
quotes \10\ to buy (sell) priced higher (lower) than the opening price
will trade fourth on parity by agent under Rule 72(c)--Equities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Section 11(a)(1) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1), generally
prohibits a member of a national securities exchange from effecting
transactions on that exchange for its own account, the account of an
associated person, or any account over which it or an associated
person exercises discretion. Subsection (G) of Section 11(a)(1)
provides an exemption allowing an exchange member to have its own
floor broker execute a proprietary transaction (``G order''). A G-
Quote is an electronic method for Floor brokers to represent G
orders. G orders on NYSE yield priority, parity and precedence based
on size to all other non-G orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, proposed Rule 123D(a)(3)(C)(v) would provide that
all other limit interest that is priced equal to the opening price will
trade last and be allocated consistent with Rule 115A(b)(1)--Equities.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(4) would describe when the Exchange would
open a security electronically on a quote. First, proposed Rule
123D(a)(4)(A) would provide that if interest of less than a round lot
pairs off at a price within the Opening Price Range, the Exchange would
open on a quote. In this circumstance, after opening on a quote,
interest of less than a round lot would trade at the price closest to
the Reference Price (or at the Reference Price if the only interest is
market orders), but would not be reported as an opening trade.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(4)(B) would provide that the Exchange would
open a security electronically on a quote if interest of any size pairs
off at a price below (above) the lower (upper) boundary of the Opening
Price Range, in which case, such paired-off interest would not trade.
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(4)(C) would provide that the Exchange would
open a security electronically on a quote if there is no interest that
can be quoted on either or both sides of the market. The proposed Rule
would further specify that if an opening quote has a zero bid and/or a
zero offer, it would not constitute an ``Opening Price'' as defined in
Section I(I) of the Regulation NMS Plan to Address Extraordinary Market
Volatility (the ``Plan'').\11\ Accordingly, if the Exchange were to
open on a quote with a zero bid and/or a zero offer, it would not
calculate a midpoint of the quote for purposes of calculating Price
Bands as provided for in Section V(B)(1) of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091, 77 FR 33498
(June 6, 2012) (File No. 4-631).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(5) would specify which information would be
provided in advance of an opening or reopening. In order to provide
transparency regarding the opening process, the Exchange proposes that
during an opening effected by the Exchange, Order Imbalance Information
pursuant to Rule 15(c)--Equities would be published.\12\ However,
because the
[[Page 67832]]
Exchange would not open a security at a price outside of specified
ranges, the Exchange would not issue pre-opening indications in a
security pursuant to either Rule 15(a)--Equities or 123D.\13\ The
Exchange further proposes that it would publish pre-opening indications
pursuant to Rule 123D(b) for a re-opening following a regulatory halt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Order Imbalance Information reflects real-time order
imbalances that accumulate prior to the opening transaction on the
Exchange and the price at which interest eligible to participate in
the opening transaction may be executed in full. Order Imbalance
Information disseminated pursuant to Rule 15(c)--Equities includes
all interest eligible for execution in the opening transaction of
the security in Exchange systems, i.e., electronic interest,
including Floor broker electronic interest, entered into Exchange
systems prior to the opening. Order Imbalance Information is
disseminated on the Exchange's proprietary data feeds. See Rule
15(c)(1)--Equities.
\13\ See Proposed Rule 123D(a)(2) (F) [sic]. Rule 123D(1)
requires the dissemination of one or more indications in connection
with any delayed opening where a security has not opened or been
quoted by 10 a.m. In addition, Rule 123D(1) provides that
dissemination of one or more indication is mandatory for an opening
which will result in a ``significant'' price change from the
previous close. For securities priced under $10, such indications
are mandatory if the price change is one dollar of more; for
securities between $10 and $99.99, indications are required for
price movements of the lesser of 10% or three dollars; and for
securities over $100, indications are required for price movements
of five dollars or more.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 123D(a)(6) would describe under which circumstances
the Exchange would cancel orders after opening on a trade or quote. A
proposed in new Rule 123D(a)(6)(A), all unexecuted Market Orders, MOO
Orders, and LOO Orders would be cancelled. This would be new behavior
following an Exchange-facilitated open because under a DMM-facilitated
open, all Market and MOO Orders are guaranteed to participate and
therefore there would not be any unexecuted Market Orders or MOO Orders
following an opening. Proposed Rule 123D(a)(6)(B) would provide that
after an opening on a trade, buy (sell) Limit Orders priced higher
(lower) than the opening price would be cancelled. Lastly, proposed
Rule 123D(a)(6)(C) would provide that if interest would have paired off
at a price below (above) the lower (upper) boundary of the Opening
Price Range, after opening on a quote, sell (buy) Limit Orders would be
cancelled. The Exchange proposes to cancel only the side of the orders
that would cause an opening price to be outside of the Opening Price
Range parameters; the other side would not be cancelled and would be
included in the opening quote.
The Exchange also proposes to delete current Rule 123D(4), which
sets forth a non-regulatory trading halt condition designated
``Structured Products.'' Rule 123D(4) was adopted to permit the halting
of trading of exchange traded funds (``ETFs'') and structured products
on the Exchange to facilitate the closing of the Exchange's former
trading floor in connection with the acquisition of the Exchange by
NYSE Euronext in 2008. Orders in ETFs and structured products subject
to the trading halt condition are routed from the Exchange to its
affiliate NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'').\14\ The condition permits
the Exchange to halt ETFs or structured products that remain listed on
the Exchange.\15\ All Exchange-listed ETFs and structured products have
transferred to NYSE Arca and are no longer traded on the Exchange,
rendering Rule 123D(4) moot.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58824 (October 21,
2008), 73 FR 63754 (October 27, 2008) (SR-NYSEALTR-2008-02). See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58705 (October 1, 2008), 73
FR 58995 (October 8, 2008) (SR-Amex-2008-63).
\15\ See id.
\16\ The Exchange also proposes to amend current Rule 123D(2) to
replace single quotation marks with double quotation marks around
the term ``Equipment Changeover'' and to delete current Rule
123D(3), which is marked ``Reserved.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the technology changes associated with the proposed rule
change, the Exchange proposes to announce the implementation date via
Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\17\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and protect investors and the public interest. The
Exchange believes that permitting the Exchange to electronically open
trading would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system by ensuring an orderly
open if the registered DMM cannot manually or electronically facilitate
the open of trading as required under Rule 104(a). Similarly, the
proposal promotes just and equitable principles of trade and removes
impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market by
providing customers and the investing public with the certainty of an
open in circumstances where business continuity disruptions or other
emergencies would prevent the assigned DMMs from opening a security.
For the same reasons, the proposal is also designed to protect
investors as well as the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to Rule
123D(a)(3) to provide that openings effected by the Exchange would be
within a proposed numerical guideline would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market because, similar to how
Nasdaq and NYSE Arca Equities function, it would enable the Exchange to
set parameters for an opening to assure that the potential prices that
a security may open would not be significantly away from the Reference
Price. Similarly, the Exchange believes that excluding interest
eligible for the open that would cause an execution to occur outside
the Opening Price Range parameters, even if such interest would
otherwise be required to be included in an open effected by a DMM,
would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a fair and
orderly market because it would assure that the Exchange could effect
the open within the proposed specified price ranges. The proposed rule
therefore promotes just and equitable principles of trade because it
provides transparency to entering firms of whether interest would be
eligible to participate in a closing transaction effected by the
Exchange.
Finally, deleting an obsolete halt condition in Rule 123D(4)
removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open
market by removing confusion that may result from having obsolete
references in the Exchange's rulebook. The Exchange further believes
that the proposal removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of
a free and open market by ensuring that persons subject to the
Exchange's jurisdiction, regulators, and the investing public, can more
easily navigate and understand the Exchange's rulebook. The Exchange
believes that eliminating obsolete references would not be inconsistent
with the public interest and the protection of investors because
investors will not be harmed and in fact would benefit from increased
transparency, thereby reducing potential confusion. Removing such
obsolete references will also further the goal of transparency and add
clarity to the Exchange's rules.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address competitive issues but rather enable the
Exchange to open trading where circumstances would prevent a DMM from
facilitating an open.
[[Page 67833]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \19\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\20\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \21\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\22\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \23\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV.Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2015-81 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2015-81. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should referto File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2015-
81, and should be submitted on or before November 24, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-27909 Filed 11-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P