Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL Passenger Cars (Manufactured Before September 1, 2006) Are Eligible for Importation, 67483-67485 [2015-27824]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
2005–21711; FMCSA–2005–22194;
FMCSA–2007–27897; FMCSA–2009–
0154. Their exemptions are effective as
of December 27, 2015 and will expire on
December 27, 2017.
As of December 31, 2015, and in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315, the following 6 individuals have
satisfied the conditions for obtaining a
renewed exemption from the vision
requirements (66 FR 53826; 66 FR
66966; 68 FR 61857; 68 FR 69434; 68 FR
75715; 70 FR 74102; 71 FR 646; 72 FR
71993; 72 FR 71998; 74 FR 65846; 76 FR
78729; 78 FR 67454; 78 FR 67462; 79 FR
4803):
Martiniano L. Espinosa (FL)
Dustin K. Heimbach (PA)
James G. LaBair (MI)
Lonnie Lomax, Jr. (IL)
Eugene C. Murphy (FL)
John H. Voigts (AZ).
The drivers were included in one of
the following dockets: Docket No.
FMCSA–2001–10578; FMCSA–2003–
16241. Their exemptions are effective as
of December 31, 2015 and will expire on
December 31, 2017.
Each of the 99 applicants listed in the
groups above has requested renewal of
the exemption and has submitted
evidence showing that the vision in the
better eye continues to meet the
requirement specified at 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) and that the vision
impairment is stable. In addition, a
review of each record of safety while
driving with the respective vision
deficiencies over the past two years
indicates each applicant continues to
meet the vision exemption
requirements.
These factors provide an adequate
basis for predicting each driver’s ability
to continue to drive safely in interstate
commerce. Therefore, FMCSA
concludes that extending the exemption
for each renewal applicant for a period
of two years is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Comments
FMCSA will review comments
received at any time concerning a
particular driver’s safety record and
determine if the continuation of the
exemption is consistent with the
requirements at 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315. However, FMCSA requests that
interested parties with specific data
concerning the safety records of these
drivers submit comments by December
2, 2015.
FMCSA believes that the
requirements for a renewal of an
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315 can be satisfied by initially
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
granting the renewal and then
requesting and evaluating, if needed,
subsequent comments submitted by
interested parties. As indicated above,
the Agency previously published
notices of final disposition announcing
its decision to exempt these 99
individuals from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final
decision to grant an exemption to each
of these individuals was made on the
merits of each case and made only after
careful consideration of the comments
received to its notices of applications.
The notices of applications stated in
detail the qualifications, experience,
and medical condition of each applicant
for an exemption from the vision
requirements. That information is
available by consulting the above cited
Federal Register publications.
Interested parties or organizations
possessing information that would
otherwise show that any, or all, of these
drivers are not currently achieving the
statutory level of safety should
immediately notify FMCSA. The
Agency will evaluate any adverse
evidence submitted and, if safety is
being compromised or if continuation of
the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49
U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will
take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.
Submitting Comments
You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. FMCSA recommends that
you include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that FMCSA can contact you if there
are questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and in the
search box insert the docket numbers
FMCSA–1999–5578; FMCSA–2001–
9258; FMCSA–2001–10578; FMCSA–
2002–11426; FMCSA–2003–14223;
FMCSA–2003–15892; FMCSA–2003–
16241; FMCSA–2005–21711; FMCSA–
2005–22194; FMCSA–2007–27897;
FMCSA–2007–29019; FMCSA–2009–
0121; FMCSA–2009–0154; FMCSA–
2009–0206; FMCSA–2011–0092;
FMCSA–2011–0142; FMCSA–2011–
0275; FMCSA–2011–0276; FMCSA–
2011–26690; FMCSA–2013–0022;
FMCSA–2013–0166; FMCSA–2013–
0169 and click the search button. When
the new screen appears, click on the
blue ‘‘Comment Now!’’ button on the
right hand side of the page. On the new
page, enter information required
including the specific section of this
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67483
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope.
We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment
period and may change this proposed
rule based on your comments. FMCSA
may issue a final rule at any time after
the close of the comment period.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any
documents mentioned in this preamble,
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and in the
search box insert the docket number
FMCSA–1999–5578; FMCSA–2001–
9258; FMCSA–2001–10578; FMCSA–
2002–11426; FMCSA–2003–14223;
FMCSA–2003–15892; FMCSA–2003–
16241; FMCSA–2005–21711; FMCSA–
2005–22194; FMCSA–2007–27897;
FMCSA–2007–29019; FMCSA–2009–
0121; FMCSA–2009–0154; FMCSA–
2009–0206; FMCSA–2011–0092;
FMCSA–2011–0142; FMCSA–2011–
0275; FMCSA–2011–0276; FMCSA–
2011–26690; FMCSA–2013–0022;
FMCSA–2013–0166; FMCSA–2013–
0169 and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, click
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ and you will find
all documents and comments related to
the proposed rulemaking.
Issued on: October 21, 2015.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–27884 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0081; Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 2006
Mercedes-Benz SL Passenger Cars
(Manufactured Before September 1,
2006) Are Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
67484
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
nonconforming 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL
passenger cars (manufactured before
September 1, 2006) that were not
originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable Federal motor vehicle
safety standards (FMVSS), are eligible
for importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to
vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL
that was manufactured before
September 1, 2006) and they are capable
of being readily altered to conform to
the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is December 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How to Read Comments Submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Stevens, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC of Baltimore
(JK), Maryland (Registered Importer 90–
006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide
whether nonconforming 2006 MercedesBenz SL passenger cars (manufactured
before September 1, 2006) are eligible
for importation into the United States.
The vehicles which JK believes are
substantially similar are 2006 MercedesBenz SL passenger cars (manufactured
before September 1, 2006) that were
manufactured for sale in the United
States and certified by their
manufacturer as conforming to all
applicable FMVSS.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The petitioner claims that it compared
non-U.S. certified 2006 Mercedes-Benz
SL passenger cars (manufactured before
September 1, 2006) to their U.S.certified counterparts, and found the
vehicles to be substantially similar with
respect to compliance with most
FMVSS.
JK submitted information with its
petition intended to demonstrate that
non-U.S. certified 2006 Mercedes-Benz
SL passenger cars (manufactured before
September 1, 2006), as originally
manufactured, conform to many FMVSS
in the same manner as their U.S.
certified counterparts, or are capable of
being readily altered to conform to those
standards. Specifically, the petitioner
claims that non-U.S. certified 2006
Mercedes-Benz SL passenger cars
(manufactured before September 1,
2006) are identical to their U.S. certified
counterparts with respect to compliance
with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission
Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock,
and Transmission Braking Effect, 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging
Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109
New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch
System, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids,
124 Accelerator Control Systems, 135
Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 201
Occupant Protection in Interior Impact,
202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering
Control Rearward Displacement, 205
Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and
Door Retention Components, 207
Seating Systems, 210 Seat Belt
Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield
Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection,
216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219
Windshield Zone Intrusion, 225 Child
Restraint Anchorage Systems, and 302
Flammability of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the
vehicles are capable of being readily
altered to meet the following standards,
in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and
Displays: Replacement of the instrument
cluster with a U.S.-model component
and reprogramming the unit to activate
required safety systems.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment:
Replacement of the headlamps, side
marker lamps, and tail lamps with U.S.model components.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and
Rims for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR
of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or
Less: Installation of a tire information
placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors:
Replacement of the passenger side
rearview mirror with a U.S.-model
component or inscription of the
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
required warning statement on the face
of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection
and Rollaway Prevention:
Reprogramming the vehicle computer to
activate safety systems.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated
Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Reprogramming of the vehicle
computer.
Standard No. 138 Tire Pressure
Monitoring Systems: Addition of OEM
tire pressure monitoring system using
OEM parts and programs.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash
Protection: Reprogramming in order to
activate audible warning system.
Installation of U.S.-Model front cross
member and knee bolsters.
Standard No. 209 Seat Belt
Assemblies: Installation of U.S.-model
passenger seat belt.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System
Integrity: Inspection of all vehicles and
replacement of any non U.S.-model fuel
system components with U.S.-model
components as necessary to conform to
the requirements of the standard.
Standard No. 401 Interior Trunk
Release: Installation of U.S.-model
interior trunk release components.
The petitioner additionally states that
a vehicle identification plate must be
affixed to the vehicles near the left
windshield post to meet the
requirements of 49 CFR part 565.
All comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above addresses both
before and after that date. To the extent
possible, comments filed after the
closing date will also be considered.
Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A),
(a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.7; delegation
of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–27824 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2015–0209; Notice No.
15–21]
Hazardous Materials: Explosive
Approvals—Compliance With Special
Provision 347
proposing to terminate the approvals
listed below for the approval holders’
failure to provide PHMSA with
evidence that UN 6(d) testing has been
performed in accordance with 49 CFR
172.102(c)(1) (Special Provision 347) or
requesting a reassignment of the EX
number to a higher compatibility group
other than ‘‘S’’.
II. Background
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Proposed termination of
explosive approvals.
AGENCY:
On January 19, 2011, PHMSA
published a final rule (76 FR 3308; HM–
215K) titled ‘‘Hazardous Materials:
Harmonization with the United Nations
Recommendations, International
SUMMARY: PHMSA proposes to terminate
Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, and
the explosive approvals listed herein.
the International Civil Aviation
PHMSA, via certified mail, attempted to
Organization Technical Instructions for
contact all of the below listed approval
the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods
holders during the month of October
by Air’’. The final rule amended Special
2014. The certified letters were titled
Provision 347 to require successful
‘‘Hazardous Materials Safety Law
testing according to UN Test Series 6(d)
Division, Letter of Warning: Test Series
of Part I of the UN Manual of Tests and
6(d) requirements for Division 1.4S
Criteria. This change affected explosives
Explosive Approvals.’’ The certified
classified as Division 1.4S, and
letters requested that the approval
impacted eight UN Numbers, including:
holders notify PHMSA within 30 days
UN0323, UN0366, UN0441, UN0445,
with their intent with respect to the
UN0455, UN0456, UN0460, and
approvals. They were given the options
UN0500. This requirement became
to provide evidence of UN 6(d) testing,
effective for transportation by aircraft on
request a reassignment of the EX
number to a higher compatibility group
July 1, 2011, for transportation by vessel
than ‘‘S’’, or request termination. To
on January 1, 2012, and for domestic
date, no correspondence has been
highway and rail transportation on
received by PHMSA concerning the
January 1, 2014. PHMSA has no records
below listed explosive approval
of the required UN 6(d) testing for the
numbers.
below listed EX numbers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
III. Action
Ryan Paquet, Director, Approvals and
Permits Division, Office of Hazardous
PHMSA will terminate the below
Materials Safety, (202) 366–4512,
listed approvals 30 days after this notice
PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
is published in the Federal Register,
Washington, DC 20590. Correspondence unless the holder requests
with respect to the below listed
reconsideration as outlined in 49 CFR
explosive approval numbers should be
107.715.
sent to explo@dot.gov, subject line—
IV. Approvals Scheduled for
‘‘UN 6(d) Testing’’ or respond to the
listed address for Mr. Ryan Paquet.
Termination
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
In this notice, PHMSA’s Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS) is
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
EX No.
EX1986060084
EX1986060085
EX1986060086
EX1986060087
EX1986060088
EX1986060089
EX1986060090
EX1986060091
EX1986060092
EX1986060093
EX1986060094
EX1986060095
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Holder/company
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
67485
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Overland
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Aviation
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Company,
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
Inc.
02NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67483-67485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27824]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0081; Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
2006 Mercedes-Benz SL Passenger Cars (Manufactured Before September 1,
2006) Are Eligible for Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
[[Page 67484]]
nonconforming 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL passenger cars (manufactured before
September 1, 2006) that were not originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS), are
eligible for importation into the United States because they are
substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for
sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer
as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified version of
the 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL that was manufactured before September 1,
2006) and they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the
standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is December 2,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to
the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
How to Read Comments Submitted to the Docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the
heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit
late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search
the Docket for new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Stevens, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC of Baltimore (JK), Maryland (Registered
Importer 90-006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming
2006 Mercedes-Benz SL passenger cars (manufactured before September 1,
2006) are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles
which JK believes are substantially similar are 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL
passenger cars (manufactured before September 1, 2006) that were
manufactured for sale in the United States and certified by their
manufacturer as conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified 2006
Mercedes-Benz SL passenger cars (manufactured before September 1, 2006)
to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be
substantially similar with respect to compliance with most FMVSS.
JK submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate
that non-U.S. certified 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL passenger cars
(manufactured before September 1, 2006), as originally manufactured,
conform to many FMVSS in the same manner as their U.S. certified
counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to
those standards. Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S.
certified 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL passenger cars (manufactured before
September 1, 2006) are identical to their U.S. certified counterparts
with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift
Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect, 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood
Latch System, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids, 124 Accelerator Control
Systems, 135 Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in
Interior Impact, 202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward
Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention
Components, 207 Seating Systems, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212
Windshield Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection, 216 Roof Crush
Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, 225 Child Restraint
Anchorage Systems, and 302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being
readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner
indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: Replacement of the
instrument cluster with a U.S.-model component and reprogramming the
unit to activate required safety systems.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: Replacement of the headlamps, side marker lamps, and tail
lamps with U.S.-model components.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims for Motor Vehicles with a
GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less: Installation of a tire
information placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Replacement of the passenger
side rearview mirror with a U.S.-model component or inscription of the
[[Page 67485]]
required warning statement on the face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention:
Reprogramming the vehicle computer to activate safety systems.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Reprogramming of the vehicle computer.
Standard No. 138 Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems: Addition of OEM
tire pressure monitoring system using OEM parts and programs.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: Reprogramming in order
to activate audible warning system. Installation of U.S.-Model front
cross member and knee bolsters.
Standard No. 209 Seat Belt Assemblies: Installation of U.S.-model
passenger seat belt.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Inspection of all vehicles
and replacement of any non U.S.-model fuel system components with U.S.-
model components as necessary to conform to the requirements of the
standard.
Standard No. 401 Interior Trunk Release: Installation of U.S.-model
interior trunk release components.
The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification
plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post to
meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 565.
All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49
CFR 593.7; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-27824 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P