Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Its Parent Company, 67461-67464 [2015-27798]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices provisions as the proposed rule change, as described above. The proposed rule change to add detail to the rules regarding the impact of changes in the leg markets on a COA describes current functionality and is merely intended to enhance the description of this functionality in the Rules, and thus has no impact on competition. The nonsubstantive and technical changes have no impact on competition. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: A. By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– CBOE–2015–089 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–2015–089. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CBOE– 2015–089 and should be submitted on or before November 23, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.29 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–27793 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76281; File No. SR–C2– 2015–026] Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Its Parent Company October 27, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that, on October 23, 2015, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this 29 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 67461 notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of its parent Company, CBOE Holdings, Inc. (‘‘CBOE Holdings’’). The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site (https:// www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/ CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose CBOE Holdings is proposing to make certain amendments to its Certificate and Bylaws. Proposed Amendments to the Certificate CBOE Holdings proposes to make various amendments to its Certificate. First, CBOE Holdings proposes to eliminate references that are applicable only in connection with the CBOE demutualization and CBOE Holdings initial public offering (‘‘IPO’’) in 2010. Currently, the Certificate provides for the designation, preferences and rights related to Class A–1 and Class A–2 common stock that had been authorized by the Board and CBOE Holdings’ stockholders prior to the IPO. No shares of Class A–1 or Class A–2 common stock are currently outstanding, nor would CBOE Holdings be able to issue such shares at any time in the future as the current Certificate limits their use to the conversion of Class A and Class B common stock, which was issued in connection with the IPO and has been retired. Accordingly, CBOE Holdings proposes to delete obsolete provisions E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1 67462 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices related to the designation, rights and preferences of these series of common stock. The Exchange also proposes to remove references to the 10% ownership concentration limitation applicable before the IPO. This change would not change the current ownership concentration limitation, which is 20%. CBOE Holdings also proposes other non-substantive changes to the Certificate include referring to the ‘‘Second’’ Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, clarifying that any stockholder votes on the Bylaws would be in addition to any votes required by law, and updating references to the Common Stock, as only one class of common stock will be outstanding. The Exchange notes that the proposed changes will not have any effect on the rights of a stockholder.3 Proposed Amendments to the Bylaws asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES CBOE Holdings also proposes to make various amendments to its Bylaws. First, CBOE Holdings proposes to adopt an Exclusive Forum Provision. Specifically, CBOE Holdings seeks to adopt Article 11—Forum for Adjudication of Disputes. Proposed Article 11 provides that Delaware would be the exclusive forum for any shareholder litigation against the Company. CBOE Holdings notes that the proposed adoption of Article 11 alleviates the risk of multi-forum shareholder litigation in which the same claims are litigated in different courts, which can potentially drain corporate resources, increase the distraction and hassle of litigation, and risk inconsistent rulings and judgments. CBOE Holdings also notes that exclusive forum provisions have been upheld by the Delaware Court of Chancery and that legislative amendments to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (‘‘DGCL’’) related to exclusive forum provisions were recently signed 3 For example, the Exchange notes that the proposed change in Article Fourth, subparagraph (c)(x) from ‘‘Voting Common Stock’’ to ‘‘stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon’’ is not intended to affect the rights of a stockholder or change which class of shares are entitled to vote to increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock. Specifically, the Exchange notes that, as is currently the case, for any proposal to increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock, common stock would continue to vote together with any series of Preferred Stock that is allowed to vote on such a proposal pursuant to its terms. The Exchange also notes that the provisions in Article Sixth of the Certificate which limit ownership and voting concentration continue to apply and as such, any proposal to increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock, if any, would be subject to those limitations. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 into law by the Delaware governor and became effective August 1, 2015.4 Next, CBOE Holdings proposes to amend various sections in Article 2 to delete obsolete and/or unnecessary language, as well as reflect current best practices among Delaware corporations in the drafting of their governing documents, including changes with respect to the scheduling, notice and action at meetings and the nomination of directors. For example, Section 2.2 of the Bylaws is proposed to be amended to delete language requiring the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on the third Tuesday in May of each year, as the Exchange does not believe such requirement is necessary. Additionally, Section 2.2 is proposed to be amended to eliminate now outdated language which provides that such requirement starts the year immediately following the year in which the restructuring of CBOE is consummated. Section 2.4 of the Bylaws is proposed to be amended to add language providing that certain notice requirements of each meeting of stockholders apply except as otherwise provided by the Certificate of Incorporation or CBOE Holdings Bylaws. CBOE Holdings also proposes to add language to Section 2.4 to explicitly provide that notices of all meetings shall state the means of remote communications, if any, by which stockholders and proxy holders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at such meeting. CBOE Holdings notes that Section 2.1 already contemplates remote communications.5 Section 2.7 of the Bylaws is being amended to make the Bylaw language consistent with DGCL Section 222 (c) (Notice of meetings and adjourned meetings). Section 2.10 is being proposed to be amended to make certain clarifications relating to actions at meetings. For example, CBOE Holdings proposes to clarify that a majority of the votes properly cast upon any question other than an election of directors shall decide the question, except when a ‘‘different’’ (rather than ‘‘larger’’) vote is required by the Bylaws, rules or regulations of any stock exchange applicable to the Corporation, or any law or regulation applicable to the Corporation or its securities. Additionally, CBOE Holdings proposes 4 See e.g., Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corporation, 73 A.3d 934 (Del. Ch. 2013). The Chancery Court ruled that boards are statutorily empowered to adopt such bylaws so long as the specific corporate articles of organization permit director amendment of bylaws, which is generally the case. See also DGCL Section 115. 5 See CBOE Holdings Bylaws, Section 2.1 which provides that ‘‘all meetings of stockholders shall be held at such place, if any, within or without the State of Delaware . . .’’ PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 to explicitly clarify that ‘‘abstentions’’ and ‘‘broker nonvotes’’ are not counted as a vote case either ‘‘for’’ or ‘‘against’’ a director’s election. Section 2.11 is being proposed to be amended to (i) eliminate outdated language and (ii) make minor changes related to the nomination process for election of Board of Directors in a manner similar to the practices of other Delaware corporations. For example, Section 2.11 is being amended with regards to notice requirements for director nominations in the event the annual meeting is not conducted within a certain period of time. Specifically, Section 2.11 currently provides that if the annual meeting is not held within thirty (30) days before or after the anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders, the nominations must be delivered or mailed and received by the Secretary not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the annual meeting date was made. CBOE Holdings seeks to amend Section 2.11 to permit the annual meeting to be held up to seventy (70) days after the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting without altering the deadlines regarding when the nominations must be delivered or mailed and received by apply and to also confirm that an adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting does not commence a new time period or extend any time period for a stockholder’s notice. CBOE Holdings notes that the proposed change provides CBOE Holdings more flexibility with regards to scheduling the annual meeting date without altering the time periods for stockholder notices for director nominations. CBOE Holdings additionally proposes to amend Section 2.11 to clarify that stockholder notices for director nominations shall also set forth any other information relating to the stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies, as well and also explicitly provide that CBOE Holdings may require any proposed nominee to furnish any other information that CBOE Holdings may reasonable require to determine eligibility of the proposed nominee to serve as director of the Corporation. CBOE Holdings also proposes to amend the Bylaws to make other nonsubstantive changes. For example, CBOE Holdings proposes to amend Section 3.4 of the Bylaws to provide that a director may resign by giving either written or electronic notice as well as E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices proposes to delete an unnecessary sentence related to the term of the Executive Committee members in Article 4, Section 4.2.6 Additionally, CBOE Holdings proposes to make nonsubstantive, clarifying changes to Section 9.3 of the Bylaws including adding the term ‘‘equity owners’’ (in addition to the current terms of ‘‘stockholders’’ and ‘‘shareholders’’). CBOE Holdings also proposes to amend Section 10.1 of the Bylaws. Specifically, Section 10.1 currently provides that stockholders of CBOE Holdings may amend the Bylaws, provided that notice of the proposed change was given in the notice of the stockholders meeting at which such action is to be taken. CBOE Holdings proposes to eliminate this requirement as it does not believe it is substantive or necessary. Particularly, CBOE Holdings notes that this requirement is already provided for in Section 2.12 of the Bylaws.7 Additionally, CBOE Holdings notes that Article Twelfth of the Certificate, which governs amendments of the Bylaws by stockholders of CBOE Holdings, does not include this requirement. Accordingly, and in order to conform Section 10.1 of the Bylaws to Article Twelfth of the Certificate, CBOE Holdings proposes to remove this language from Section 10.1. CBOE Holdings also proposes to amend Section 10.2 of the Bylaws to replace the reference of ‘‘CBOE’’ to ‘‘Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated’’ to avoid any potential confusion as to what CBOE refers to. 2. Statutory Basis asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.8 Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6 The Exchange notes that pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Bylaws, directors are to be elected annually and thus the term for any Board committee composed exclusively of directors would be for no longer than one year. The Exchange also notes that the terms for members of other Board committees are also not explicitly referenced or included in CBOE Holdings’ Bylaws. See Article 4, Sections 4.3 (The Audit Committee), 4.4 (The Compensation Committee) and 4.5 (The Nominating and Governance Committee). 7 See Section 2.12 of the Bylaws which provides ‘‘To be in proper written form, a stockholder’s notice to the Secretary shall set forth . . . the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and, in the event that such business includes a proposal to amend the Bylaws of the Corporation, the language of the proposed amendment . . .’’ 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Oct 30, 2015 Jkt 238001 6(b)(5) 9 requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 10 requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. In particular, CBOE Holdings believes that eliminating references in the Certificate that are applicable only in connection with the 2010 IPO removes obsolete language and alleviates potential confusion. Additionally, CBOE Holdings believes the remaining changes to the Certificate are nonsubstantive and clarifying in nature, which makes the Certificate easier to read and also alleviates potential confusion. The alleviation of potential confusion removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes adopting Article 11 governing the forum for adjudication of disputes alleviates the risk of multi-forum shareholder litigation in which the same claims are litigated in different courts, which can potentially drain corporate resources, increase the distraction and hassle of litigation, and risk inconsistent rulings and judgments. The Exchange believes alleviating potential drain on corporate resources allows the Exchange to direct such resources in administration of the Exchange, enhancing investor protection. CBOE Holdings believes the remaining changes are either clarifying in nature or reflect current best practices among Delaware corporations in the drafting of their governing documents and thus enhance investor protection by making CBOE Holdings governance documents clearer and easier to understand and in line with current governance best practices. 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). PO 00000 Frm 00082 B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition Because the proposed rule change relates to the governance of CBOE Holdings and not to the operations of the Exchange, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: A. significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; B. impose any significant burden on competition; and C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 12 thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml;); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– C2–2015–026 on the subject line. 11 15 10 Id. 12 17 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 67463 E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 02NON1 67464 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–C2–2015–026. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–C2– 2015–026 and should be submitted on or before November 23, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.13 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–27798 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–2736. Extension: 13 17 18:55 Oct 30, 2015 Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of extension of the previously approved collection of information provided for in Regulation R, Rule 701 (17 CFR 247.701) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). Regulation R, Rule 701 requires a broker or dealer (as part of a written agreement between the bank and the broker or dealer) to notify the bank if the broker or dealer makes certain determinations regarding the financial status of the customer, a bank employee’s statutory disqualification status, and compliance with suitability or sophistication standards. The Commission estimates that brokers or dealers would, on average, notify 1,000 banks approximately two times annually about a determination regarding a customer’s high net worth or institutional status or suitability or sophistication standing as well as a bank employee’s statutory disqualification status. Based on these estimates, the Commission anticipates that Regulation R, Rule 701 would result in brokers or dealers making approximately 2,000 notifications to banks per year. The Commission further estimates (based on the level of difficulty and complexity of the applicable activities) that a broker or dealer would spend approximately 15 minutes per notice to a bank. Therefore, the estimated total annual third party disclosure burden for the requirements in Regulation R, Rule 701 is 500 1 hours for brokers or dealers. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public may view background documentation for this information collection at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an email to: Shagufta_ Ahmed@comb.eop.gov; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange 1 (2000 notices × 15 minutes) = 30,000 minutes/ 60 minutes = 500 hours. CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 Regulation R, Rule 701; SEC File No. 270– 562, OMB Control No. 3235–0624. Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an email to PRA_ Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice. Dated: October 27, 2015. Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–27801 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76282; File No. SR–CBOE– 2015–092] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of its Parent Company October 27, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that, on October 23, 2015, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of its parent Company, CBOE Holdings, Inc. (‘‘CBOE Holdings’’). The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site (https:// www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/ CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed 1 15 2 17 E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 02NON1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67461-67464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27798]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76281; File No. SR-C2-2015-026]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Exchange, Incorporated; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Its Parent Company

October 27, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on October 23, 2015, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange proposes to amend the certificate of incorporation and
bylaws of its parent Company, CBOE Holdings, Inc. (``CBOE Holdings'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
CBOE Holdings is proposing to make certain amendments to its
Certificate and Bylaws.
Proposed Amendments to the Certificate
CBOE Holdings proposes to make various amendments to its
Certificate. First, CBOE Holdings proposes to eliminate references that
are applicable only in connection with the CBOE demutualization and
CBOE Holdings initial public offering (``IPO'') in 2010. Currently, the
Certificate provides for the designation, preferences and rights
related to Class A-1 and Class A-2 common stock that had been
authorized by the Board and CBOE Holdings' stockholders prior to the
IPO. No shares of Class A-1 or Class A-2 common stock are currently
outstanding, nor would CBOE Holdings be able to issue such shares at
any time in the future as the current Certificate limits their use to
the conversion of Class A and Class B common stock, which was issued in
connection with the IPO and has been retired. Accordingly, CBOE
Holdings proposes to delete obsolete provisions

[[Page 67462]]

related to the designation, rights and preferences of these series of
common stock. The Exchange also proposes to remove references to the
10% ownership concentration limitation applicable before the IPO. This
change would not change the current ownership concentration limitation,
which is 20%. CBOE Holdings also proposes other non-substantive changes
to the Certificate include referring to the ``Second'' Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, clarifying that any stockholder
votes on the Bylaws would be in addition to any votes required by law,
and updating references to the Common Stock, as only one class of
common stock will be outstanding. The Exchange notes that the proposed
changes will not have any effect on the rights of a stockholder.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ For example, the Exchange notes that the proposed change in
Article Fourth, subparagraph (c)(x) from ``Voting Common Stock'' to
``stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon'' is not
intended to affect the rights of a stockholder or change which class
of shares are entitled to vote to increase or decrease the number of
authorized shares of Preferred Stock. Specifically, the Exchange
notes that, as is currently the case, for any proposal to increase
or decrease the number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock,
common stock would continue to vote together with any series of
Preferred Stock that is allowed to vote on such a proposal pursuant
to its terms. The Exchange also notes that the provisions in Article
Sixth of the Certificate which limit ownership and voting
concentration continue to apply and as such, any proposal to
increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of Preferred
Stock, if any, would be subject to those limitations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Amendments to the Bylaws
CBOE Holdings also proposes to make various amendments to its
Bylaws. First, CBOE Holdings proposes to adopt an Exclusive Forum
Provision. Specifically, CBOE Holdings seeks to adopt Article 11--Forum
for Adjudication of Disputes. Proposed Article 11 provides that
Delaware would be the exclusive forum for any shareholder litigation
against the Company. CBOE Holdings notes that the proposed adoption of
Article 11 alleviates the risk of multi-forum shareholder litigation in
which the same claims are litigated in different courts, which can
potentially drain corporate resources, increase the distraction and
hassle of litigation, and risk inconsistent rulings and judgments. CBOE
Holdings also notes that exclusive forum provisions have been upheld by
the Delaware Court of Chancery and that legislative amendments to the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (``DGCL'') related to
exclusive forum provisions were recently signed into law by the
Delaware governor and became effective August 1, 2015.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ See e.g., Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron
Corporation, 73 A.3d 934 (Del. Ch. 2013). The Chancery Court ruled
that boards are statutorily empowered to adopt such bylaws so long
as the specific corporate articles of organization permit director
amendment of bylaws, which is generally the case. See also DGCL
Section 115.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next, CBOE Holdings proposes to amend various sections in Article 2
to delete obsolete and/or unnecessary language, as well as reflect
current best practices among Delaware corporations in the drafting of
their governing documents, including changes with respect to the
scheduling, notice and action at meetings and the nomination of
directors. For example, Section 2.2 of the Bylaws is proposed to be
amended to delete language requiring the annual meeting of stockholders
to be held on the third Tuesday in May of each year, as the Exchange
does not believe such requirement is necessary. Additionally, Section
2.2 is proposed to be amended to eliminate now outdated language which
provides that such requirement starts the year immediately following
the year in which the restructuring of CBOE is consummated. Section 2.4
of the Bylaws is proposed to be amended to add language providing that
certain notice requirements of each meeting of stockholders apply
except as otherwise provided by the Certificate of Incorporation or
CBOE Holdings Bylaws. CBOE Holdings also proposes to add language to
Section 2.4 to explicitly provide that notices of all meetings shall
state the means of remote communications, if any, by which stockholders
and proxy holders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at
such meeting. CBOE Holdings notes that Section 2.1 already contemplates
remote communications.\5\ Section 2.7 of the Bylaws is being amended to
make the Bylaw language consistent with DGCL Section 222 (c) (Notice of
meetings and adjourned meetings). Section 2.10 is being proposed to be
amended to make certain clarifications relating to actions at meetings.
For example, CBOE Holdings proposes to clarify that a majority of the
votes properly cast upon any question other than an election of
directors shall decide the question, except when a ``different''
(rather than ``larger'') vote is required by the Bylaws, rules or
regulations of any stock exchange applicable to the Corporation, or any
law or regulation applicable to the Corporation or its securities.
Additionally, CBOE Holdings proposes to explicitly clarify that
``abstentions'' and ``broker nonvotes'' are not counted as a vote case
either ``for'' or ``against'' a director's election. Section 2.11 is
being proposed to be amended to (i) eliminate outdated language and
(ii) make minor changes related to the nomination process for election
of Board of Directors in a manner similar to the practices of other
Delaware corporations. For example, Section 2.11 is being amended with
regards to notice requirements for director nominations in the event
the annual meeting is not conducted within a certain period of time.
Specifically, Section 2.11 currently provides that if the annual
meeting is not held within thirty (30) days before or after the
anniversary date of the preceding year's annual meeting of
stockholders, the nominations must be delivered or mailed and received
by the Secretary not later than the close of business on the 10th day
following the date on which public announcement of the annual meeting
date was made. CBOE Holdings seeks to amend Section 2.11 to permit the
annual meeting to be held up to seventy (70) days after the anniversary
date of the immediately preceding annual meeting without altering the
deadlines regarding when the nominations must be delivered or mailed
and received by apply and to also confirm that an adjournment or
postponement of an annual meeting does not commence a new time period
or extend any time period for a stockholder's notice. CBOE Holdings
notes that the proposed change provides CBOE Holdings more flexibility
with regards to scheduling the annual meeting date without altering the
time periods for stockholder notices for director nominations. CBOE
Holdings additionally proposes to amend Section 2.11 to clarify that
stockholder notices for director nominations shall also set forth any
other information relating to the stockholder and beneficial owner, if
any, required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings
required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies, as
well and also explicitly provide that CBOE Holdings may require any
proposed nominee to furnish any other information that CBOE Holdings
may reasonable require to determine eligibility of the proposed nominee
to serve as director of the Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ See CBOE Holdings Bylaws, Section 2.1 which provides that
``all meetings of stockholders shall be held at such place, if any,
within or without the State of Delaware . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CBOE Holdings also proposes to amend the Bylaws to make other non-
substantive changes. For example, CBOE Holdings proposes to amend
Section 3.4 of the Bylaws to provide that a director may resign by
giving either written or electronic notice as well as

[[Page 67463]]

proposes to delete an unnecessary sentence related to the term of the
Executive Committee members in Article 4, Section 4.2.\6\ Additionally,
CBOE Holdings proposes to make non-substantive, clarifying changes to
Section 9.3 of the Bylaws including adding the term ``equity owners''
(in addition to the current terms of ``stockholders'' and
``shareholders''). CBOE Holdings also proposes to amend Section 10.1 of
the Bylaws. Specifically, Section 10.1 currently provides that
stockholders of CBOE Holdings may amend the Bylaws, provided that
notice of the proposed change was given in the notice of the
stockholders meeting at which such action is to be taken. CBOE Holdings
proposes to eliminate this requirement as it does not believe it is
substantive or necessary. Particularly, CBOE Holdings notes that this
requirement is already provided for in Section 2.12 of the Bylaws.\7\
Additionally, CBOE Holdings notes that Article Twelfth of the
Certificate, which governs amendments of the Bylaws by stockholders of
CBOE Holdings, does not include this requirement. Accordingly, and in
order to conform Section 10.1 of the Bylaws to Article Twelfth of the
Certificate, CBOE Holdings proposes to remove this language from
Section 10.1. CBOE Holdings also proposes to amend Section 10.2 of the
Bylaws to replace the reference of ``CBOE'' to ``Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated'' to avoid any potential confusion as to what
CBOE refers to.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\6\ The Exchange notes that pursuant to Section 3.2 of the
Bylaws, directors are to be elected annually and thus the term for
any Board committee composed exclusively of directors would be for
no longer than one year. The Exchange also notes that the terms for
members of other Board committees are also not explicitly referenced
or included in CBOE Holdings' Bylaws. See Article 4, Sections 4.3
(The Audit Committee), 4.4 (The Compensation Committee) and 4.5 (The
Nominating and Governance Committee).
\7\ See Section 2.12 of the Bylaws which provides ``To be in
proper written form, a stockholder's notice to the Secretary shall
set forth . . . the text of any resolutions proposed for
consideration and, in the event that such business includes a
proposal to amend the Bylaws of the Corporation, the language of the
proposed amendment . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis

The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In particular, CBOE Holdings believes that eliminating references
in the Certificate that are applicable only in connection with the 2010
IPO removes obsolete language and alleviates potential confusion.
Additionally, CBOE Holdings believes the remaining changes to the
Certificate are non-substantive and clarifying in nature, which makes
the Certificate easier to read and also alleviates potential confusion.
The alleviation of potential confusion removes impediments to and
perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes adopting Article 11 governing the forum for
adjudication of disputes alleviates the risk of multi-forum shareholder
litigation in which the same claims are litigated in different courts,
which can potentially drain corporate resources, increase the
distraction and hassle of litigation, and risk inconsistent rulings and
judgments. The Exchange believes alleviating potential drain on
corporate resources allows the Exchange to direct such resources in
administration of the Exchange, enhancing investor protection.
CBOE Holdings believes the remaining changes are either clarifying
in nature or reflect current best practices among Delaware corporations
in the drafting of their governing documents and thus enhance investor
protection by making CBOE Holdings governance documents clearer and
easier to understand and in line with current governance best
practices.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

Because the proposed rule change relates to the governance of CBOE
Holdings and not to the operations of the Exchange, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes
of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
A. significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
B. impose any significant burden on competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml;); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-C2-2015-026 on the subject line.

[[Page 67464]]

Paper Comments

Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2015-026. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2015-026 and should be
submitted on or before November 23, 2015.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-27798 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.