Wooden Bedroom Furniture From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review, 67417-67420 [2015-27661]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda P. Fisherow, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2737. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on January 28, 2014, based on a
complaint filed by Magna Electronics
Inc. of Auburn Hills, Michigan. See 79
FR 4490–91 (Jan. 28, 2014). The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
337’’), in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain vision-based
driver assistance system cameras and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 8,116,929 (‘‘the ’929
patent’’) and 8,593,521 (‘‘the ’521
patent’’). The complaint further alleges
the existence of a domestic industry.
Subsequently, the complaint and notice
of investigation were amended by
adding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,686,840 (‘‘the
’840 patent’’) and 8,692,659 (‘‘the ’659
patent’’), and by terminating the
investigation in-part as to all claims of
the ’521 patent. The ’929 patent was
later terminated from the investigation.
The respondent named in the
Commission’s notice of investigation is
TRW Automotive U.S., LLC of Livonia,
Michigan (‘‘TRW’’). The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also
named a party in the investigation.
On April 27, 2015, the ALJ issued his
final ID. The ID found that no violation
of section 337 has occurred.
Specifically, the ID found that the ’659
and ’840 patents were not indirectly
infringed, that the ’840 patent is invalid,
and that the domestic industry
requirement for the ’840 patent has not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
been met. The ALJ also issued his
recommendation on remedy and
bonding.
On May 11, 2015, Magna and TRW
each filed petitions for review. On May
19, 2015, the parties, including OUII,
filed responses to the respective
petitions for review. On May 28, 2015,
Magna filed a corrected response. The
Commission determined to review the
ID’s findings with respect to: (1)
Importation; (2) whether the asserted
claims of the ’659 patent require a
camera; (3) direct infringement of the
’659 patent; (4) induced infringement of
the ’659 and ’840 patents; (5)
contributory infringement of the ’659
and ’840 patents; (6) whether the ’659
patent satisfies the requirements of 35
U.S.C. 112; (7) anticipation of the ’659
patent claims based on Rayner; (8)
anticipation of the ’659 patent claims
based on Batavia; (9) anticipation of the
’659 patent claims based on the
SafeTrac Prototype; (10) obviousness of
the ’659 patent based on Rayner in
combination with Blank; (11)
obviousness of the ’659 patent based on
Batavia, the SafeTrac Prototype, and the
Navlab 1997 Demo; (12) whether the
claims are invalid under the America
Invents Act § 33(a); and (13) the
technical prong of domestic industry for
the ’659 and ’840 patents.
On August 17, 2015, the parties
briefed the issues on review, remedy,
bonding, and the public interest. On
August 27, 2015, the parties filed their
reply submissions. After the conclusion
of this briefing, TRW filed
‘‘Respondent’s Short Submission Out Of
Time Regarding Complainant
Admission on Commission Topic 2’’
and Magna filed a response thereto.
After considering the final ID, written
submissions, and the record in this
investigation, the Commission has
determined to affirm-in-part and
reverse-in-part the final ID and to
terminate the investigation with a
finding of no violation of section 337.
Specifically, the Commission finds that
(1) the importation requirement has not
been satisfied for the ’659 patent; (2) the
asserted claims of the ’659 patent do not
require a camera; (3) certain
automobiles equipped with a mounting
system configured to receive certain
accused products directly infringe the
’659 patent; (4) the accused products do
not contributorily infringe the ’659
patent; (5) the accused products do not
induce infringement of the ’659 patent;
(6) claims 1 and 3 of the ’659 patent are
invalid under 35 U.S.C. 103 based on
Rayner in view of Blank; (7) claims 1
and 3 of the ’659 patent are not
anticipated by Rayner; (8) the asserted
claims are not invalid under the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67417
America Invents Act § 33(a); (9) the
technical prong of the domestic industry
requirement for the ’840 patent has not
been met; and (10) the technical prong
of the domestic industry requirement for
the ’659 patent has not been met. The
Commission also (11) takes no position
on indirect infringement of the ’840
patent; (12) takes no position on
importation with respect to the ’840
patent; (13) takes no position on
whether claim 1 of the ’659 patent is
invalid based on Batavia, the SafeTrac
Prototype, and the Navlab 1997 Demo,
either alone or in combination; (14)
takes no position on whether the
asserted claims of the ’659 patent satisfy
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112; and
(15) rejects TRW’s filing titled
‘‘Respondent’s Short Submission Out Of
Time Regarding Complainant
Admission on Commission Topic 2.’’
A Commission Opinion will issue
shortly.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 27, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–27811 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1058 (Second
Review)]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From
China; Institution of a Five-Year
Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’), as amended, to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on wooden bedroom
furniture from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury. Pursuant to the Act,
interested parties are requested to
respond to this notice by submitting the
information specified below to the
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
67418
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Commission; 1 to be assured of
consideration, the deadline for
responses is December 2, 2015.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
January 14, 2016.
DATES: Effective Date: November 2,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.— On January 4, 2005,
the Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on imports of
wooden bedroom furniture from China
(70 FR 329). Following the first five-year
reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective December 30,
2010, Commerce issued a continuation
of the antidumping duty order on
imports of wooden bedroom furniture
from China (75 FR 82373). The
Commission is now conducting a
second review pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)), to determine whether
revocation of the order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
Provisions concerning the conduct of
this proceeding may be found in the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, Subparts
A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts
A and F. The Commission will assess
the adequacy of interested party
responses to this notice of institution to
determine whether to conduct a full
review or an expedited review. The
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 15–5–347,
expiration date June 30, 2017. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20436.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
Commission’s determination in any
expedited review will be based on the
facts available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year review, as defined
by the Department of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review
is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination and its full first five-year
review determination, the Commission
found one Domestic Like Product
consisting of all wooden bedroom
furniture, including both joinery and
non-joinery forms, coextensive with
Commerce’s scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original determination,
the Commission defined the Domestic
Industry as all domestic producers of
wooden bedroom furniture. In its full
first five-year review determination, the
Commission defined the Domestic
Industry as all producers of the
Domestic Like Product, except those
firms for which it specifically excluded
because their primary interest was as
Importers of the Subject Merchandise
rather than as Domestic Producers.
Certain Commissioners defined the
Domestic Industry differently in the full
first five-year review.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the proceeding and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the proceeding as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or their representatives, who are parties
to the proceeding.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they
may appear in a review even if they
participated personally and
substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation or an
earlier review of the same underlying
investigation. The Commission’s
designated agency ethics official has
advised that a five-year review is not the
same particular matter as the underlying
original investigation, and a five-year
review is not the same particular matter
as an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation for purposes of
18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment
statute for Federal employees, and
Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR
201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014),
73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008).
Consequently, former employees are not
required to seek Commission approval
to appear in a review under Commission
rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the
corresponding underlying original
investigation or an earlier review of the
same underlying investigation was
pending when they were Commission
employees. For further ethics advice on
this matter, contact Carol McCue
Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official,
at 202–205–3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in this proceeding available
to authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the proceeding, provided that
the application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the proceeding. A
separate service list will be maintained
by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the
APO.
Certification.—Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with this
proceeding must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
will be deemed to consent, unless
otherwise specified, for the
Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the
information provided in any other
reviews or investigations of the same or
comparable products which the
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
and operations of the Commission
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.—Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is December 2, 2015.
Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as
specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments
concerning the adequacy of responses to
the notice of institution and whether the
Commission should conduct an
expedited or full review. The deadline
for filing such comments is January 14,
2016. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of sections
201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission’s
rules and any submissions that contain
BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6 and
207.7 of the Commission’s rules. Please
be aware that the Commission’s rules
with respect to filing have changed. The
most recent amendments took effect on
July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25,
2014), and the revised Commission
Handbook on E-filing, available from the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Also, in accordance with
sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the
Commission’s rules, each document
filed by a party to the proceeding must
be served on all other parties to the
proceeding (as identified by either the
public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the proceeding you do
not need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested
information.—Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677e(b)) in making its determination in
the review.
Information to be Provided In
Response to This Notice of Institution:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes
any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address) and name, telephone number,
fax number, and Email address of the
certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of
the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union
or worker group, a U.S. importer of the
Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer
or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business
association, or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in this proceeding by providing
information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping duty
order on the Domestic Industry in
general and/or your firm/entity
specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in
section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of
subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of
imports of Subject Merchandise on the
Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries after
2009.
(7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in
the U.S. market for the Domestic Like
Product and the Subject Merchandise
(including street address, World Wide
Web address, and the name, telephone
number, fax number, and Email address
of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of
information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or
the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or
other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during
calendar year 2014, except as noted
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67419
(report quantity data in terms of both
pieces and pounds and value data in
U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms in
which your workers are employed/
which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Domestic Like Product (i.e.,
the level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have
expected to attain during the year,
assuming normal operating conditions
(using equipment and machinery in
place and ready to operate), normal
operating levels (hours per week/weeks
per year), time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a
typical or representative product mix);
(c) the quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s);
(d) the quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost
of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit,
(iv) selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating
income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include
both U.S. and export commercial sales,
internal consumption, and company
transfers) for your most recently
completed fiscal year (identify the date
on which your fiscal year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country, provide the
following information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2014 (report quantity data
in terms of both pieces and pounds and
value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a
trade/business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties)
of U.S. imports and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total U.S.
imports of Subject Merchandise from
the Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping and/or
countervailing duties) of U.S.
commercial shipments of Subject
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
67420
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
Merchandise imported from the Subject
Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping and/or
countervailing duties) of U.S. internal
consumption/company transfers of
Subject Merchandise imported from the
Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country,
provide the following information on
your firm’s(s’) operations on that
product during calendar year 2014
(report quantity data in terms of both
pieces and pounds and value data in
U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at
the U.S. port but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties).
If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms which are members
of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in the Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s)
to produce the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country (i.e., the level of
production that your establishment(s)
could reasonably have expected to
attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment
and machinery in place and ready to
operate), normal operating levels (hours
per week/weeks per year), time for
downtime, maintenance, repair, and
cleanup, and a typical or representative
product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from the Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country after 2009, and
significant changes, if any, that are
likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
Country, and such merchandise from
other countries.
(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: This proceeding is being
conducted under authority of Title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 26, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–27661 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–959]
Certain Electric Skin Care Devices,
Brushes and Chargers Therefore, and
Kits Containing the Same: Notice of a
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting-in-Part Complainant’s Motion
for Leave To Amend the Amended
Complaint and Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 22) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting-in-part complainant’s motion
for leave to amend the amended
complaint and notice of investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3115. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
under section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
(‘‘Section 337’’), on June 25, 2015, based
on a complaint filed by Pacific
Bioscience Laboratories, Inc. of
Redmond, Washington (‘‘PBL’’) on April
30, 2015. An amended complaint was
filed on May 20, 2015. 80 FR 36576–77
(Jun. 25, 2015). The amended
complaint, as supplemented, alleges a
violation of Section 337 by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 7,320,691 (‘‘the ’691
patent’’) and 7,386,906, and U.S. Design
Patent No. D523,809 by numerous
respondents. The amended complaint
further alleges violations of Section 337
based upon the importation into the
United States, or in the sale of certain
electric skin care devices, brushes and
chargers therefor, and kits containing
the same, by reason of trade dress
infringement, the threat or effect of
which is to destroy or substantially
injure an industry in the United States.
Id. The Commission’s Office of Unfair
Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also
named as a party.
On September 11, 2015, complainant
PBL filed a motion pursuant to 19 CFR
210.14(b) seeking leave to amend its
amended complaint and the
Commission’s notice of investigation to
(1) change the name of respondent
‘‘Michael Todd True Organics LP’’ to
‘‘Michael Todd LP’’ in order to reflect
the new name of that entity; (2) assert
violation as to an additional accused
product of respondents Michael Todd
LP and MTTO LLC (collectively, ‘‘MT’’);
and (3) assert infringement of additional
claims of the ’691 patent by MT’s
accused products. On September 23,
2015, the Commission investigative
attorney filed a response supporting the
motion in part and opposing the motion
in part. On September 28, 2015, PBL
filed a reply brief.
On October 2, 2015, the ALJ issued
Order No. 22, granting-in-part and
denying-in-part complainant’s motion.
The ALJ granted PBL’s motion with
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67417-67420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27661]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-1058 (Second Review)]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From China; Institution of a Five-Year
Review
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a
review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act''), as amended, to
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on wooden
bedroom furniture from China would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information
specified below to the
[[Page 67418]]
Commission; \1\ to be assured of consideration, the deadline for
responses is December 2, 2015. Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by January 14, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 15-5-347,
expiration date June 30, 2017. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send
comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: November 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.-- On January 4, 2005, the Department of Commerce issued
an antidumping duty order on imports of wooden bedroom furniture from
China (70 FR 329). Following the first five-year reviews by Commerce
and the Commission, effective December 30, 2010, Commerce issued a
continuation of the antidumping duty order on imports of wooden bedroom
furniture from China (75 FR 82373). The Commission is now conducting a
second review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the order would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions
concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201,
Subparts A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission
will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice
of institution to determine whether to conduct a full review or an
expedited review. The Commission's determination in any expedited
review will be based on the facts available, which may include
information provided in response to this notice.
Definitions.--The following definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by the Department
of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination and its full first five-year review determination, the
Commission found one Domestic Like Product consisting of all wooden
bedroom furniture, including both joinery and non-joinery forms,
coextensive with Commerce's scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original determination, the
Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all domestic producers of
wooden bedroom furniture. In its full first five-year review
determination, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all
producers of the Domestic Like Product, except those firms for which it
specifically excluded because their primary interest was as Importers
of the Subject Merchandise rather than as Domestic Producers. Certain
Commissioners defined the Domestic Industry differently in the full
first five-year review.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the proceeding and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the proceeding.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if
they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation. The Commission's designated agency ethics
official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular
matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review
is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post
employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b)
(19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5,
2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek
Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR
201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or
an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when
they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this
matter, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official, at
202-205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the
application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent
interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the
Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification.--Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is
accurate and complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent,
unless otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the information provided in any other reviews
or investigations of the same or comparable products which the
[[Page 67419]]
Commission conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits
and investigations relating to the programs and operations of the
Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.--Pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission's rules, each interested party response to this notice must
provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such
responses is December 2, 2015. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission's rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of
responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission
should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing
such comments is January 14, 2016. All written submissions must conform
with the provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission's
rules and any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the Commission's rules.
Please be aware that the Commission's rules with respect to filing have
changed. The most recent amendments took effect on July 25, 2014. See
79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014), and the revised Commission Handbook on E-
filing, available from the Commission's Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov. Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3
of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to the
proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as
identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate),
and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are
not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested information.--Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in
making its determination in the review.
Information to be Provided In Response to This Notice of
Institution: As used below, the term ``firm'' includes any related
firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email
address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S.
producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a
U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or
business association, or another interested party (including an
explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or
which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by
the Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping duty order on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your
firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various
factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a))
including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on
the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 2009.
(7) A list of 3-5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the
Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street
address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax
number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the
U.S. or other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during calendar year 2014, except as noted (report quantity
data in terms of both pieces and pounds and value data in U.S. dollars,
f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business
association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the
firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like
Product (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could
reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready
to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year),
time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or
representative product mix);
(c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
(d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
and
(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS),
(iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial
sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most
recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal
year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country,
provide the following information on your firm's(s') operations on that
product during calendar year 2014 (report quantity data in terms of
both pieces and pounds and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a
trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
[[Page 67420]]
Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during calendar year 2014 (report quantity
data in terms of both pieces and pounds and value data in U.S. dollars,
landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or
countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are
members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that
your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during
the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and
machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels
(hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance,
repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2009, and significant changes,
if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time.
Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods;
development efforts; ability to increase production (including the
shift of production facilities used for other products and the use,
cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors
related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets
(including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in
market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses
and applications; the existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the
Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries.
(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority
of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 26, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-27661 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P