Barium Chloride From China; Determination, 66935 [2015-27739]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 210 / Friday, October 30, 2015 / Notices
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 26, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–27668 Filed 10–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–149 (Fourth
Review)]
Barium Chloride From China;
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930, that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on barium
chloride from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review
on May 1, 2015 (80 FR 24973) and
determined on August 4, 2015 that it
would conduct an expedited review (80
FR 50869, August 21, 2015).
The Commission made this
determination pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed
its determination in this review on
October 27, 2015. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4574 (October 2015),
entitled Barium Chloride from China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–149 (Fourth
Review).
By order of the Commission.
record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
17:37 Oct 29, 2015
Jkt 238001
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By mail .........
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
[FR Doc. 2015–27739 Filed 10–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On October 26, 2015, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Ohio
in the lawsuit entitled United States v.
Cleveland Thermal, LLC., Civil Action
No. 1:15–cv–2198.
In the Complaint, the United States
alleges that Cleveland Thermal, LLC,
(‘‘Cleveland Thermal’’) violated, at a
steam generating facility that it owns
and operates in Cleveland, Ohio, the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
regulations, the Nonattainment New
Source Review regulations, and the
Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources, all promulgated
under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401
et seq.
Under the Consent Decree, Cleveland
Thermal will retire all three of its coalfired boilers; will retire three of its five
fuel oil-fired boilers; and will operate its
remaining two fuel oil-fired boilers as
‘‘limited use’’ boilers. Cleveland
Thermal will install and operate new
natural gas-fired boilers to replace the
lost capacity. The new natural gas-fired
boilers must be properly permitted. In
addition, Cleveland Thermal may opt to
install and operate a properly permitted
new, natural gas-fired cogeneration
facility. Cleveland Thermal will pay a
civil penalty of $75,000 and perform an
environmental mitigation project worth
$350,000.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. Cleveland Thermal,
LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–10579. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
1 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Issued: October 27, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
Send them to:
By e-mail ......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66935
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611
Please enclose a check or money order
for $24.75 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury. For a paper copy
without the exhibits and signature
pages, the cost is $15.50.
Randall M. Stone,
Acting Assistant Section Chief,
Environmental Enforcement Section,
Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2015–27615 Filed 10–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Resource
Justification Model
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting the Employment
and Training Administration (ETA)
sponsored information collection
request (ICR) revision titled, ‘‘Resource
Justification Model,’’ to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval for use in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). Public comments on the
ICR are invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all
written comments that agency receives
on or before November 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with
applicable supporting documentation;
including a description of the likely
respondents, proposed frequency of
response, and estimated total burden
may be obtained free of charge from the
RegInfo.gov Web site at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201507-1205-002
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 210 (Friday, October 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 66935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27739]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-149 (Fourth Review)]
Barium Chloride From China; Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
review, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, that
revocation of the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from China
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review on May 1, 2015 (80 FR
24973) and determined on August 4, 2015 that it would conduct an
expedited review (80 FR 50869, August 21, 2015).
The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed
its determination in this review on October 27, 2015. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4574 (October 2015),
entitled Barium Chloride from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-149
(Fourth Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 27, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-27739 Filed 10-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
