Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 66613-66614 [2015-27610]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 209 / Thursday, October 29, 2015 / Notices
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, the
decision only applies to the subject tires
that Goodyear no longer controlled at
the time it determined that the
noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve
equipment distributors and dealers of
the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant tires under their
control after Goodyear notified them
that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–27611 Filed 10–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0098; Notice 1]
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC,
Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Continental Tire the
Americas, LLC (CTA), has determined
that certain Continental Tire T-type
spare tires do not fully comply with
paragraph S4.3(a) of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
109, New Pneumatic and Certain
Specialty Tires. CTA has filed an
appropriate report dated August 25,
2015 and amended on October 1, 2015,
pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
SUMMARY:
The closing date for comments
on the petition is November 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of
this notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:37 Oct 28, 2015
Jkt 238001
• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
hand to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by: logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202)
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following
the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556),
CTA submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of CTA’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66613
II. Tires Involved: Affected are
approximately 3,627 Continental Tire
CST 17 size T125/70R17 98M temporary
spare tires sold to General Motors and
also in small quantities in the
replacement market. These tires were
manufactured between March 18, 2012
and April 11, 2015.
III. Noncompliance: CTA explains
that the noncompliance is that the tire
size designation markings on the
sidewalls of the subject tires do not
contain the tire type code designator
symbol from The Tire and Rim
Association yearbook as required by
paragraph S4.3(a) of FMVSS No. 109.
Specifically, the subject tire size reads
‘‘125/70R17 98M’’ but should read
‘‘T125/70R17 98M’’ indicating the tire is
a spare tire and for temporary use.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3(a) of
FMVSS No. 109 requires in pertinent
part:
S4.3 Labeling Requirements. Except as
provided in S4.3.1 and S4.3.2 of this
standard, each tire, except for those certified
to comply with S5.5 of § 571.139, shall have
permanently molded into or onto both
sidewalls, in letters and numerals not less
than 0.078 inches high, the information
shown in paragraphs S4.3(a) through (g) of
this standard. On at least one sidewall, the
information shall be positioned in an area
between the maximum section width and
bead of the tire, unless the maximum section
width of the tire falls between the bead and
one-fourth of the distance from the bead to
the shoulder of the tire . . .
(a) One size designation, except that
equivalent inch and metric size designations
may be used; . . .
V. Summary of CTA’s Analyses: CTA
stated that the only missing marking on
the sidewalls of the affected tires is the
letter ‘‘T’’ as part of the size designation.
CTA also stated its belief that the
omission of the tire size designation
markings has no impact on the
operational performance or durability of
these tires or on the safety of vehicles
on which these tires may be mounted
and that the affected tires cannot be
confused with normal P-metric or
metric passenger tires for the following
reasons:
1. Both sidewalls of the affected tires
have permanently molded letters that
are 1⁄2 inch tall with the words
‘‘TEMPORARY USE ONLY.’’
2. Both sidewalls of the affected tires
have permanently molded letters and
numerals that are 1⁄2 inch tall with the
words ‘‘INFLATE TO 420KPA (60PSI),’’
as required by section S4.3.5 of FMVSS
No. 109.
3. The affected tires are intended as a
spare tire for the Chevy Impala, which
is equipped with four ground tires of
size P235[/]55R17 98W. Thus, the
ground tires are significantly different in
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
66614
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 209 / Thursday, October 29, 2015 / Notices
width (approximately four inches
wider) and in diameter (approximately
three inches larger).
The affected tires also have a starting
tread depth of only 3⁄32 inch, whereas a
typical P-metric or metric passenger tire
has a much deeper tread depth of
approximately 10⁄32 inch.
CTA notes that they are not aware of
any crashes, injuries, customer
complaints or field reports associated
with this noncompliance.
CTA informed NHTSA that it has
corrected the mold at the manufacturing
plant so that no additional tires will be
manufactured with the subject
noncompliance and that all remaining
CTA inventory of the subject tires in
their possession have been scrapped.
CTA stated its belief that NHTSA has
previously granted inconsequential
noncompliance petitions regarding
noncompliances that they believe are
similar to the subject noncompliance.
In summation, CTA believes that the
described noncompliance of the subject
tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety, and that its petition, to exempt
CTA from providing recall notification
of noncompliance as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject tires that CTA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that
the noncompliance existed. However,
any decision on this petition does not
relieve equipment distributors and
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale,
offer for sale, or introduction or delivery
for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires
under their control after CTA notified
them that the subject noncompliance
existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–27610 Filed 10–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:37 Oct 28, 2015
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0041; Notice 2]
Tireco, Inc., Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
AGENCY:
Tireco, Inc., (Tireco) has
determined that certain Tireco Traction
tires do not fully comply with paragraph
S6.5(b) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New
Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with
a GVWR of More than 4,536 Kilograms
(10,000 pounds) and Motorcycles.
Tireco has filed an appropriate report
dated March 30, 2015, pursuant to 49
CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
SUMMARY:
For further information on
this decision contact Abraham Diaz,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–5310, facsimile (202) 366–
5930.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556),
Tireco submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published with a 30-day public
comment period, on June 11, 2015 in
the Federal Register (80 FR 33333). No
comments were received. To view the
petition and all supporting documents
log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Web site
at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2015–
0041.’’
II. Tires Involved: Affected are
approximately 1,600 Tireco Power King
Traction size 8.25–20E/10, Power King
Traction size 9.00–20 E/10, Milestar
Traction size 8.25–20 E/10, and Milestar
Traction size 9.00–20 E/10 tires. These
tires were manufactured between March
1, 2014 and March 22, 2015.
III. Noncompliance: Tireco explains
that the noncompliance is that the Tire
Information Numbers (TINs) required to
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be marked on the tire sidewalls by
paragraph S6.5(b) of FMVSS No. 119 are
incomplete because they do not include
the tire size codes required by 49 CFR
part 574.5(b).
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S6.5 of
FMVSS No. 119 requires in pertinent
part:
S6.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in
this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on
each sidewall with the information in
paragraph (a) through (j) of this section. The
markings shall be placed between the
maximum section width (exclusive of
sidewall decorations or curb ribs) and the
bead on at least one sidewall, unless the
maximum section width of the tire is located
in an area which is not more than one-fourth
of the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire. If the maximum section width
falls within that area, the markings shall
appear between the bead and a point one-half
the distance from the bead to the shoulder of
the tire, on at least one sidewall. The
markings shall be in letters and numerals not
less than 2 mm (0.078 inch) high and raised
above or sunk below the tire surface not less
than 0.4 mm (0.015 inch), except that the
marking depth shall be not less than 0.25mm
(0.010 inch) in the case of motorcycle tires.
The tire identification and the DOT symbol
labeling shall comply with part 574 of this
chapter. Markings may appear on only one
sidewall and the entire sidewall area may be
used in the case of motorcycle tires and
recreational, boat, baggage, and special trailer
tires . . .
(b) The tire identification number required
by part 574 of this chapter. This number may
be marked on only one sidewall. . . .
V. Summary of TIRECO’s Arguments:
Tireco state its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons:
(A) Tireco believes that the absence of
the tire size code from the TIN has no
impact on the operational performance
of the subject tires or on the safety of
vehicles on which the subject tires are
mounted because the subject tires meet
or exceed all of the applicable
performance requirements specified by
FMVSS No. 119.
(B) Tireco states that even though the
size code is absent from the TIN, the tire
size information is readily available to
consumers in a more understandable
way by virtue of the actual tire size
marking on the sidewalls.
(C) Tireco also states that in the
unlikely event that any of the subject
tires are ever found to contain a defect
or a substantive noncompliance that
would warrant a recall, the recalled tires
could be adequately identified through
the partial [T]IN that is stamped on the
sidewall.
(D) Tireco referenced
inconsequentiality petitions NHTSA has
previously granted in the past that have
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 209 (Thursday, October 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66613-66614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27610]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0098; Notice 1]
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Receipt of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Continental Tire the Americas, LLC (CTA), has determined that
certain Continental Tire T-type spare tires do not fully comply with
paragraph S4.3(a) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
109, New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires. CTA has filed an
appropriate report dated August 25, 2015 and amended on October 1,
2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is November 30,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), CTA submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of CTA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Tires Involved: Affected are approximately 3,627 Continental
Tire CST 17 size T125/70R17 98M temporary spare tires sold to General
Motors and also in small quantities in the replacement market. These
tires were manufactured between March 18, 2012 and April 11, 2015.
III. Noncompliance: CTA explains that the noncompliance is that the
tire size designation markings on the sidewalls of the subject tires do
not contain the tire type code designator symbol from The Tire and Rim
Association yearbook as required by paragraph S4.3(a) of FMVSS No. 109.
Specifically, the subject tire size reads ``125/70R17 98M'' but should
read ``T125/70R17 98M'' indicating the tire is a spare tire and for
temporary use.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3(a) of FMVSS No. 109 requires in
pertinent part:
S4.3 Labeling Requirements. Except as provided in S4.3.1 and
S4.3.2 of this standard, each tire, except for those certified to
comply with S5.5 of Sec. 571.139, shall have permanently molded
into or onto both sidewalls, in letters and numerals not less than
0.078 inches high, the information shown in paragraphs S4.3(a)
through (g) of this standard. On at least one sidewall, the
information shall be positioned in an area between the maximum
section width and bead of the tire, unless the maximum section width
of the tire falls between the bead and one-fourth of the distance
from the bead to the shoulder of the tire . . .
(a) One size designation, except that equivalent inch and metric
size designations may be used; . . .
V. Summary of CTA's Analyses: CTA stated that the only missing
marking on the sidewalls of the affected tires is the letter ``T'' as
part of the size designation.
CTA also stated its belief that the omission of the tire size
designation markings has no impact on the operational performance or
durability of these tires or on the safety of vehicles on which these
tires may be mounted and that the affected tires cannot be confused
with normal P-metric or metric passenger tires for the following
reasons:
1. Both sidewalls of the affected tires have permanently molded
letters that are \1/2\ inch tall with the words ``TEMPORARY USE ONLY.''
2. Both sidewalls of the affected tires have permanently molded
letters and numerals that are \1/2\ inch tall with the words ``INFLATE
TO 420KPA (60PSI),'' as required by section S4.3.5 of FMVSS No. 109.
3. The affected tires are intended as a spare tire for the Chevy
Impala, which is equipped with four ground tires of size P235[/]55R17
98W. Thus, the ground tires are significantly different in
[[Page 66614]]
width (approximately four inches wider) and in diameter (approximately
three inches larger).
The affected tires also have a starting tread depth of only \3/32\
inch, whereas a typical P-metric or metric passenger tire has a much
deeper tread depth of approximately \10/32\ inch.
CTA notes that they are not aware of any crashes, injuries,
customer complaints or field reports associated with this
noncompliance.
CTA informed NHTSA that it has corrected the mold at the
manufacturing plant so that no additional tires will be manufactured
with the subject noncompliance and that all remaining CTA inventory of
the subject tires in their possession have been scrapped.
CTA stated its belief that NHTSA has previously granted
inconsequential noncompliance petitions regarding noncompliances that
they believe are similar to the subject noncompliance.
In summation, CTA believes that the described noncompliance of the
subject tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt CTA from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that CTA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after CTA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-27610 Filed 10-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P