Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Exchange Rule 6.25, 66102-66104 [2015-27343]
Download as PDF
66102
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
program to continue uninterrupted
while the industry gains further
experience operating under the LULD
Plan, and avoid any investor confusion
that could result from a temporary
interruption in the pilot program. For
this reason, the Commission designates
the proposed rule change to be operative
upon filing.10
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2015–60 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2015–60. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
10 For
purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–
2015–60, and should be submitted on or
before November 18, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division
of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.11
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–27356 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–76223; File No. SR–CBOE–
2015–097]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Exchange
Rule 6.25
October 22, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
21, 2015, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend a
pilot program related to Rule 6.25
(Nullification and Adjustment of
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Options Transactions including Obvious
Errors). The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (https://www.cboe.com/About
CBOE/CBOELegalRegulatory
Home.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to extend
the effectiveness of the Exchange’s
current rule applicable to obvious
errors. Interpretation and Policy .01 to
Rule 6.25, explained in further detail
below, is currently operating on a pilot
program set to expire on October 23,
2015. The Exchange proposes to extend
the pilot program so that it coincides
with the pilot period for the Plan to
Address Extraordinary Market Volatility
Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS
under the Act (‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down
Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’), including any
extensions to the pilot period for the
Plan. Currently the Plan Participants
have proposed the 9th amendment to
the Plan which, if approved, would
extend the pilot period of the Plan to
April 22, 2016.3
On April 5, 2013, the Commission
approved, on a pilot basis, amendments
to Exchange Rule 6.25 that stated that
options executions will not be adjusted
or nullified if the execution occurs
while the underlying security is in a
limit or straddle state as defined by the
Plan.4 Under the terms of this current
pilot program, though options
executions will generally not be subject
to review as an Obvious Error or
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75917
(September 14, 2015), 80 FR 56515 (September 18,
2015) (File No. 4–631).
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69328
(April 5, 2013), 78 FR 21642 (April 11, 2013) (SR–
CBOE–2013–030). See also Exchange Rule 6.25.01.
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
Catastrophic Error while the underlying
security is in a limit or straddle state,
such executions may be reviewed by the
Exchange should the Exchange decide
to do so under its own motion pursuant
to sub-paragraph (c)(3) of Rule 6.25, or
a bust or adjust pursuant to paragraphs
(e) through (j) and Interpretation .05 of
Rule 6.25.5
Pursuant to a comment letter filed in
connection with the order approving the
establishment of the pilot, the Exchange
committed to submit monthly data
regarding the program.6 In addition, the
Exchange agreed to submit an overall
analysis of the pilot in conjunction with
the data submitted under the Plan and
any other data as requested by the
Commission.7 Pursuant to a rule filing,
approved on April 3, 2014, each month,
the Exchange committed to provide the
Commission, and the public, a dataset
containing the data for each straddle
and limit state in optionable stocks that
had at least one trade on the Exchange.8
The Exchange will continue to provide
the Commission with this data on a
monthly basis from October 2015
through the end of the pilot. For each
trade on the Exchange, the Exchange
will provide (a) the stock symbol, option
symbol, time at the start of the straddle
or limit state, an indicator for whether
it is a straddle or limit state, and (b) for
the trades on the Exchange, the
executed volume, time-weighted quoted
bid-ask spread, time-weighted average
quoted depth at the bid, time-weighted
average quoted depth at the offer, high
execution price, low execution price,
number of trades for which a request for
review for error was received during
straddle and limit states, an indicator
variable for whether those options
outlined above have a price change
exceeding 30% during the underlying
stock’s limit or straddle state compared
to the last available option price as
reported by OPRA before the start of the
limit or straddle state (1 if observe 30%
and 0 otherwise), and another indicator
variable for whether the option price
within five minutes of the underlying
stock leaving the limit or straddle state
(or halt if applicable) is 30% away from
the price before the start of the limit or
straddle state.
In addition, the Exchange will
provide to the Commission, and the
public, assessments relating to the
impact of the operation of the obvious
5 Id.
6 See letter from Angelo Evangelou, Associate
General Counsel, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated, date April 4, 2013.
7 Id.
8 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71857
(April 3, 2014), 79 FR 19678 (April 9, 2014) (SR–
CBOE–2014–033).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
error rules during limit and straddle
states including: (1) An evaluation of
the statistical and economic impact of
limit and straddle states on liquidity
and market quality in the options
markets, and (2) an assessment of
whether the lack of obvious error rules
in effect during the straddle and limit
states are problematic. The Exchange
agrees to provide the analysis and data,
to the commission, to help evaluate the
impact of the pilot program no later
than five months prior to the expiration
of the pilot program, including any
extensions. If the Plan extension is
approved, the next data assessment will
be submitted no later than December 18,
2015.
The Exchange is now proposing to
extend the pilot period so that it
coincides with the pilot period for the
Plan, including any extensions to the
pilot period for the Plan. The pilot will
no longer have a fixed expiration date.
The Exchange believes the benefits to
market participants from this provision
should continue on a pilot basis to
coincide with the Plan. The Exchange
continues to believe that adding
certainty to the execution of orders in
limit or straddle states will encourage
market participants to continue to
provide liquidity to the Exchange, and,
thus, promote a fair and orderly market
during these periods. Barring this
provision, the provisions of Rule 6.25
would likely apply in many instances
during limit and straddle states. The
Exchange believes that continuing the
pilot will protect against any
unanticipated consequences in the
options markets during a limit or
straddle state. Thus, the Exchange
believes that the protections of current
Rule should continue while the industry
gains further experience operating the
Plan.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.9 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 10 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
9 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10 15
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 11 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, the Exchange further
believes that it is necessary and
appropriate in the interest of promoting
fair and orderly markets to exclude
transactions executed during a limit or
straddle state from certain aspects of the
Exchange Rule 6.25. The Exchange
believes the application of the current
rule will be impracticable given the lack
of a reliable NBBO in the options market
during limit and straddle states, and
that the resulting actions (i.e., nullified
trades or adjusted prices) may not be
appropriate given market conditions.
The Exchange now proposes to extend
the pilot program so that it coincides
with the pilot period for the Plan,
including any extensions to the pilot
period for the Plan. Extension of this
pilot would ensure that limit orders that
are filled during a limit or straddle state
would have certainty of execution in a
manner that promotes just and equitable
principles of trade, removes
impediments to, and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system. Thus, the
Exchange believes that the protections
of the pilot should continue while the
industry gains further experience
operating the Plan.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Specifically,
the Exchange believes that, by extending
the duration of the pilot to coincide
with the pilot period for the Plan, the
proposed rule change will allow for
further analysis of the pilot and a
determination of how the pilot shall be
structured in the future. In doing so, the
proposed rule change will also serve to
promote regulatory clarity and
consistency, thereby reducing burdens
on the marketplace and facilitating
investor protection.
11 Id.
Sfmt 4703
66103
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
66104
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 12 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.13
The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, as it
will allow the obvious error pilot
program to continue uninterrupted
while the industry gains further
experience operating under the Plan,
and avoid any investor confusion that
could result from a temporary
interruption in the pilot program. For
this reason, the Commission designates
the proposed rule change to be operative
upon filing.14
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). As required under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
14 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
13 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–27343 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2015–097 on the subject line.
[Public Notice: 9332; No. 2014–4 ]
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2015–097. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2015–097, and should be submitted on
or before November 18, 2015.
PO 00000
Determination
The Foreign Missions Act (FMA),
codified at 22 U.S.C. 4301–4316,
authorizes the Secretary of State to
approve the terms and conditions on
which benefits are provided to foreign
missions and to make compliance with
those terms and conditions by foreign
missions mandatory. 22 U.S.C. 4304(a),
(b). Furthermore, the FMA provides that
the ‘‘[t]erms and conditions established
by the Secretary under this section may
include . . . a requirement to pay to the
Secretary a surcharge or fee.’’ 22 U.S.C.
4304(c)(1). The FMA also authorizes the
Secretary to make any provision of the
FMA applicable to international
organizations (as defined in 22 U.S.C.
4309(b)) when the Secretary determines
that such application is necessary to
carry out the policy and objectives set
forth in the FMA. 22 U.S.C. 4309(a).
Therefore, pursuant to the authority
vested in me by the FMA, in particular,
22 U.S.C. 4304(b), and Delegation of
Authority No. 198 of September 16,
1992, I hereby determine that it is
reasonably necessary to protect the
interests of the United States to require
foreign missions and international
organizations, and, in each case, their
staff members (each a ‘‘Beneficiary’’ and
collectively, ‘‘Beneficiaries’’) to pay a
surcharge or fee in instances where a
Beneficiary creates resource demands
on the Office of Foreign Missions (OFM)
by: (1) Requesting the replacement of
OFM-issued products; (2) failing to
comply with the Department’s
requirements relating to the acquisition
or maintenance of liability insurance,
license tags, or title and registration
documents for motor vehicles, vessels,
and aircraft; or (3) otherwise failing to
comply with the terms on which the
Department has required Beneficiaries
to obtain or forego benefits under the
FMA.
The authority to regulate the
provision of foreign mission benefits
under the FMA has been delegated to
the Director of OFM (Delegation of
Authority No. 214, October 5, 1994).
15 17
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 208 (Wednesday, October 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66102-66104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27343]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-76223; File No. SR-CBOE-2015-097]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Exchange Rule 6.25
October 22, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 21, 2015, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend a pilot program related to Rule
6.25 (Nullification and Adjustment of Options Transactions including
Obvious Errors). The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to extend the effectiveness of the
Exchange's current rule applicable to obvious errors. Interpretation
and Policy .01 to Rule 6.25, explained in further detail below, is
currently operating on a pilot program set to expire on October 23,
2015. The Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program so that it
coincides with the pilot period for the Plan to Address Extraordinary
Market Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS under the Act
(``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'' or ``Plan''), including any extensions to
the pilot period for the Plan. Currently the Plan Participants have
proposed the 9th amendment to the Plan which, if approved, would extend
the pilot period of the Plan to April 22, 2016.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75917 (September 14,
2015), 80 FR 56515 (September 18, 2015) (File No. 4-631).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 5, 2013, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis,
amendments to Exchange Rule 6.25 that stated that options executions
will not be adjusted or nullified if the execution occurs while the
underlying security is in a limit or straddle state as defined by the
Plan.\4\ Under the terms of this current pilot program, though options
executions will generally not be subject to review as an Obvious Error
or
[[Page 66103]]
Catastrophic Error while the underlying security is in a limit or
straddle state, such executions may be reviewed by the Exchange should
the Exchange decide to do so under its own motion pursuant to sub-
paragraph (c)(3) of Rule 6.25, or a bust or adjust pursuant to
paragraphs (e) through (j) and Interpretation .05 of Rule 6.25.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69328 (April 5, 2013),
78 FR 21642 (April 11, 2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-030). See also Exchange
Rule 6.25.01.
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to a comment letter filed in connection with the order
approving the establishment of the pilot, the Exchange committed to
submit monthly data regarding the program.\6\ In addition, the Exchange
agreed to submit an overall analysis of the pilot in conjunction with
the data submitted under the Plan and any other data as requested by
the Commission.\7\ Pursuant to a rule filing, approved on April 3,
2014, each month, the Exchange committed to provide the Commission, and
the public, a dataset containing the data for each straddle and limit
state in optionable stocks that had at least one trade on the
Exchange.\8\ The Exchange will continue to provide the Commission with
this data on a monthly basis from October 2015 through the end of the
pilot. For each trade on the Exchange, the Exchange will provide (a)
the stock symbol, option symbol, time at the start of the straddle or
limit state, an indicator for whether it is a straddle or limit state,
and (b) for the trades on the Exchange, the executed volume, time-
weighted quoted bid-ask spread, time-weighted average quoted depth at
the bid, time-weighted average quoted depth at the offer, high
execution price, low execution price, number of trades for which a
request for review for error was received during straddle and limit
states, an indicator variable for whether those options outlined above
have a price change exceeding 30% during the underlying stock's limit
or straddle state compared to the last available option price as
reported by OPRA before the start of the limit or straddle state (1 if
observe 30% and 0 otherwise), and another indicator variable for
whether the option price within five minutes of the underlying stock
leaving the limit or straddle state (or halt if applicable) is 30% away
from the price before the start of the limit or straddle state.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See letter from Angelo Evangelou, Associate General Counsel,
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated, date April 4, 2013.
\7\ Id.
\8\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71857 (April 3, 2014),
79 FR 19678 (April 9, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2014-033).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange will provide to the Commission, and the
public, assessments relating to the impact of the operation of the
obvious error rules during limit and straddle states including: (1) An
evaluation of the statistical and economic impact of limit and straddle
states on liquidity and market quality in the options markets, and (2)
an assessment of whether the lack of obvious error rules in effect
during the straddle and limit states are problematic. The Exchange
agrees to provide the analysis and data, to the commission, to help
evaluate the impact of the pilot program no later than five months
prior to the expiration of the pilot program, including any extensions.
If the Plan extension is approved, the next data assessment will be
submitted no later than December 18, 2015.
The Exchange is now proposing to extend the pilot period so that it
coincides with the pilot period for the Plan, including any extensions
to the pilot period for the Plan. The pilot will no longer have a fixed
expiration date. The Exchange believes the benefits to market
participants from this provision should continue on a pilot basis to
coincide with the Plan. The Exchange continues to believe that adding
certainty to the execution of orders in limit or straddle states will
encourage market participants to continue to provide liquidity to the
Exchange, and, thus, promote a fair and orderly market during these
periods. Barring this provision, the provisions of Rule 6.25 would
likely apply in many instances during limit and straddle states. The
Exchange believes that continuing the pilot will protect against any
unanticipated consequences in the options markets during a limit or
straddle state. Thus, the Exchange believes that the protections of
current Rule should continue while the industry gains further
experience operating the Plan.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange further believes that it is necessary
and appropriate in the interest of promoting fair and orderly markets
to exclude transactions executed during a limit or straddle state from
certain aspects of the Exchange Rule 6.25. The Exchange believes the
application of the current rule will be impracticable given the lack of
a reliable NBBO in the options market during limit and straddle states,
and that the resulting actions (i.e., nullified trades or adjusted
prices) may not be appropriate given market conditions. The Exchange
now proposes to extend the pilot program so that it coincides with the
pilot period for the Plan, including any extensions to the pilot period
for the Plan. Extension of this pilot would ensure that limit orders
that are filled during a limit or straddle state would have certainty
of execution in a manner that promotes just and equitable principles of
trade, removes impediments to, and perfects the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system. Thus, the Exchange believes
that the protections of the pilot should continue while the industry
gains further experience operating the Plan.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that, by extending the duration of the pilot to coincide with
the pilot period for the Plan, the proposed rule change will allow for
further analysis of the pilot and a determination of how the pilot
shall be structured in the future. In doing so, the proposed rule
change will also serve to promote regulatory clarity and consistency,
thereby reducing burdens on the marketplace and facilitating investor
protection.
[[Page 66104]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
as it will allow the obvious error pilot program to continue
uninterrupted while the industry gains further experience operating
under the Plan, and avoid any investor confusion that could result from
a temporary interruption in the pilot program. For this reason, the
Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon
filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2015-097 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2015-097. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2015-097, and should be
submitted on or before November 18, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-27343 Filed 10-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P