Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 62016-62018 [2015-26278]

Download as PDF 62016 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices Title 13, U.S.C., is voluntary on the part of each state. However, if states choose not to participate in Phase 1 and Phase 2, the Census Bureau cannot ensure that the 2020 Decennial Census tabulation geography will support the redistricting needs of their state. The RDP invites respondent participation in the following phases of the program: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Phase 1: BBSP The purpose of the BBSP is to afford states the opportunity to identify nonstandard Features often used as electoral boundaries (such as a power line or stream, rather than a street centerline, which might divide voters on different sides of a street into two districts) as Census block boundaries. The BBSP option affords the state liaison the opportunity to provide suggestions for 2020 Census tabulation block boundaries, resulting in more meaningful block data for the state. Liaisons are able to work with local officials including county election officers and others to ensure local geography is represented in the 2020 Census tabulation block inventory. In addition, the liaison, on behalf of the state, will make suggestions for features not desirable as census tabulation blocks. By identifying undesirable features, the liaison may assist the Census Bureau in reducing the overall number of census tabulation blocks from the 2010 inventory. Beginning in late fall of 2015, states that choose to participate in Phase 1 will begin receiving guidelines and training for providing their suggestions for the 2020 Census tabulation blocks, as well as their suggestions for exclusion of line segments, for consideration in the final 2020 Census tabulation block inventory. For the first time, states will have the opportunity to review legal limits, such as county and incorporated place boundaries, as reported through the Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS). The Census Bureau conducts the BAS annually to update information about the legal boundaries and names of all governmental units. The alignment of the BAS with the BBSP will facilitate the cooperation between state and local government. A verification phase will occur in early 2017. Phase 2: VTDP The VTDP will provide the state liaison, on behalf of the state, to submit the voting Districts (a generic term used to represent areas that administer elections such as precincts, election districts, wards, etc.) to the Census Bureau for representation in the 2020 Census Public Law 94–171 products VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Oct 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 (data and geographic products). Beginning in late 2017, states that choose to participate in VTDP will receive on a flow basis, geographic products that allow them the opportunity to update the Voting Districts (VTDs) for inclusion in the 2020 Census tabulation geography. State liaisons will continue to align their effort with updates from state and local government officials participating in the BAS. The VTD/BAS update and alignment will continue through spring of 2018. A verification phase will occur in early 2019 for states that participated in VTDP. Phase 3: Delivery of the 2020 Decennial Census Redistricting Data By April 1, 2021, the Director of the Census Bureau will, in accordance with Title 13, U.S.C., furnish the Governor and state legislative leaders, both the majority and minority, with 2020 Census population counts for standard census tabulation areas (e.g., state, Congressional district, state legislative district, AIA, county, city, town, census tract, census block group, and census block) regardless of a state’s participation in Phase 1 or 2. The Director of the Census Bureau will provide 2020 Census population counts for those states participating in Phase 2, for both the standard tabulation areas and for VTDs. For each state, this delivery will occur prior to general release and no later than April 1, 2021. Phase 4: Collection of Post-Census Redistricting Data Plans The Census Bureau requests from every state, the newly drawn Legislative and Congressional district plans and prepares appropriate data sets based on new districts. Between the 2010 Census and the 2020 Census, the effort began in 2011 using the 2010 Census as a baseline. Beginning in 2021, the Census Bureau will use the 2020 Census as a baseline. This effort will occur every two years in advance of the next Census in order to update these boundaries with new or changed plans. A verification phase will occur with each update. Phase 5: Review of the 2020 Census RDP and Recommendations for the 2030 Census RDP As the final phase of the 2020 Census RDP, the Census Bureau will work with the states to conduct a thorough review of the RDP. The intent of this review, and the final report that results, is to provide guidance to the Secretary and the Census Bureau Director in planning the 2030 Census RDP. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Affected Public: All fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Frequency: Annually. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Legal Authority: Title 13, U.S.C., Sections 16, 141, and 193. This information collection request may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. Dated: October 8, 2015. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–26127 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–122–853] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 8, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the fifth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Canada.1 The review covers one producer and exporter of the subject merchandise, Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL Canada). Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to our margin calculations. The final weighted-average dumping margin for JBL Canada is listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the Review’’ section of this notice. AGENCY: DATES: Effective Date: October 15, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 32342 (June 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results). E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482– 4929, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 8, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results. We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of the review. We received a case brief from Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively, the petitioners) on July 8, 2015, and a rebuttal brief from JBL Canada on July 13, 2015. The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is citric acid and certain citrate salts from Canada. The product is currently classified under subheadings 2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000, 2918.15.5000, and 3824.90.9290 of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of merchandise subject to the scope is dispositive.2 Period of Review The POR is May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised by parties in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov; the Issues and Decision Memorandum is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 2 A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2013–2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Oct 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we recalculated JBL Canada’s weighted-average dumping margin. Our calculations are discussed in detail in the accompanying final calculation memorandum.3 Final Results of the Review We determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or exported by JBL Canada and that entered, or were withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the POR. Assessment Rates The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after publication of these final results of review. Because we have calculated a zero margin for JBL Canada in the final results of this review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003.4 This clarification applies to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by JBL Canada for which it did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate effective during the POR if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. See Assessment Policy Notice for a full discussion of this clarification. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 3 See Memorandum to the File entitled, ‘‘Final Results Margin Calculations for Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc.,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62017 publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for JBL Canada will be that established in the final results of this review, (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 23.21 percent, the all-others rate made effective by the LTFV investigation.5 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This administrative review and notice are published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 5 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada and the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29, 2009) E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 62018 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices Dated: October 6, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Margin Calculations V. Discussion of the Issues 1. Fixed Overhead Costs 2. U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses 3. Exclusion of Below-Cost Sales From the Normal Value Calculation VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–26278 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–952] Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 9, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the 2013–2014 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge (‘‘NWR’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).1 This review covers one company, Yama Ribbons Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yama Ribbons’’).2 The Department preliminarily found mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: 1 See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 32534 (June 9, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 64565 (October 30, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). The Department determined in the underlying investigation that merchandise produced and exported by Yama Ribbons is excluded from the antidumping duty order. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as amended in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982 (September 17, 2010) (‘‘Order’’). However, merchandise which Yama exports but did not produce, as well as merchandise Yama produces but is exported by another company, remain subject to the Order. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Oct 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 which is hereby incorporated in, and adopted by, these final results. This memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://www.trade.gov/ enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Background Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum that Yama Ribbons did not have reviewable transactions during the POR. The Department invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. No parties commented. Accordingly, our Preliminary Results remain unchanged in these final results of review and are adopted as the final results of the review. DATES: Effective Date: October 15, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karine Gziryan and Robert Bolling, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 4, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4081 and (202) 482–3434, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Period of Review The period of review is September 1, 2013, through August 31, 2014. On June 16, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results in the Federal Register. We invited interested parties to submit comments on the Preliminary Results, but no comments were received. Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge. The merchandise subject to the order is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject merchandise also may enter under HTSUS subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 and under statistical categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.3 Methodology The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 3 For a complete description of the scope of the order, please see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge from the People’s Republic of China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’), dated May 29, 2015. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Final Determination of No Shipments As noted the in Preliminary Results, Yama Ribbons had no reviewable transactions of merchandise during the POR.4 As there are no changes from, or comments upon, the Preliminary Results, the Department finds that there is no reason to modify its analysis. Therefore, we continue to find that Yama Ribbons did not have reviewable transactions during the POR. Assessment The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.5 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Pursuant to the Department’s practice in non-market economy cases, because Yama Ribbons had no shipments of the subject merchandise during the POR, the Department intends to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject merchandise that entered under Yama Ribbons’ rate at the PRC-wide rate of 247.65 percent. For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or 4 See 5 See E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5. 19 CFR 351.212(b) (1). 15OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 199 (Thursday, October 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62016-62018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-853]


Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On June 8, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the fifth administrative review of 
the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts 
(citric acid) from Canada.\1\ The review covers one producer and 
exporter of the subject merchandise, Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL 
Canada).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-
2014, 80 FR 32342 (June 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to 
our margin calculations. The final weighted-average dumping margin for 
JBL Canada is listed below in the ``Final Results of the Review'' 
section of this notice.

DATES: Effective Date: October 15, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution

[[Page 62017]]

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4007 or (202) 
482-4929, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 8, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results. 
We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of the review. 
We received a case brief from Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, 
Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively, 
the petitioners) on July 8, 2015, and a rebuttal brief from JBL Canada 
on July 13, 2015. The Department conducted this administrative review 
in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act).

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is citric acid and certain 
citrate salts from Canada. The product is currently classified under 
subheadings 2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000, 2918.15.5000, and 3824.90.9290 
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Although 
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of merchandise subject to the scope 
is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in 
the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 
and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2013-2014 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Citric Acid and Certain 
Citrate Salts from Canada'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Review

    The POR is May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised by parties in the case and rebuttal briefs are 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues 
raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov; the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit 
(CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 
and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we recalculated 
JBL Canada's weighted-average dumping margin. Our calculations are 
discussed in detail in the accompanying final calculation 
memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum to the File entitled, ``Final Results Margin 
Calculations for Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc.,'' dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    We determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent 
exists for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or 
exported by JBL Canada and that entered, or were withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption during the POR.

Assessment Rates

    The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department intends 
to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after 
publication of these final results of review. Because we have 
calculated a zero margin for JBL Canada in the final results of this 
review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003.\4\ This clarification applies to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by JBL Canada for which it did not 
know that the merchandise was destined for the United States. In such 
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate effective during the POR if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. See Assessment 
Policy Notice for a full discussion of this clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(Assessment Policy Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for JBL Canada will 
be that established in the final results of this review, (2) for 
previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this 
review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific 
rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original less-
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period 
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate 
for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 23.21 
percent, the all-others rate made effective by the LTFV 
investigation.\5\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada and 
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 
(May 29, 2009)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as the 
only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order 
(APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary 
information disclosed under APO, which continues to govern business 
proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely 
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.
    This administrative review and notice are published in accordance 
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.


[[Page 62018]]


    Dated: October 6, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Margin Calculations
V. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Fixed Overhead Costs
    2. U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses
    3. Exclusion of Below-Cost Sales From the Normal Value 
Calculation
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-26278 Filed 10-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P