Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 62016-62018 [2015-26278]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
62016
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices
Title 13, U.S.C., is voluntary on the part
of each state. However, if states choose
not to participate in Phase 1 and Phase
2, the Census Bureau cannot ensure that
the 2020 Decennial Census tabulation
geography will support the redistricting
needs of their state.
The RDP invites respondent
participation in the following phases of
the program:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Phase 1: BBSP
The purpose of the BBSP is to afford
states the opportunity to identify nonstandard Features often used as electoral
boundaries (such as a power line or
stream, rather than a street centerline,
which might divide voters on different
sides of a street into two districts) as
Census block boundaries. The BBSP
option affords the state liaison the
opportunity to provide suggestions for
2020 Census tabulation block
boundaries, resulting in more
meaningful block data for the state.
Liaisons are able to work with local
officials including county election
officers and others to ensure local
geography is represented in the 2020
Census tabulation block inventory. In
addition, the liaison, on behalf of the
state, will make suggestions for features
not desirable as census tabulation
blocks. By identifying undesirable
features, the liaison may assist the
Census Bureau in reducing the overall
number of census tabulation blocks
from the 2010 inventory. Beginning in
late fall of 2015, states that choose to
participate in Phase 1 will begin
receiving guidelines and training for
providing their suggestions for the 2020
Census tabulation blocks, as well as
their suggestions for exclusion of line
segments, for consideration in the final
2020 Census tabulation block inventory.
For the first time, states will have the
opportunity to review legal limits, such
as county and incorporated place
boundaries, as reported through the
Boundary and Annexation Survey
(BAS). The Census Bureau conducts the
BAS annually to update information
about the legal boundaries and names of
all governmental units. The alignment
of the BAS with the BBSP will facilitate
the cooperation between state and local
government. A verification phase will
occur in early 2017.
Phase 2: VTDP
The VTDP will provide the state
liaison, on behalf of the state, to submit
the voting Districts (a generic term used
to represent areas that administer
elections such as precincts, election
districts, wards, etc.) to the Census
Bureau for representation in the 2020
Census Public Law 94–171 products
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
(data and geographic products).
Beginning in late 2017, states that
choose to participate in VTDP will
receive on a flow basis, geographic
products that allow them the
opportunity to update the Voting
Districts (VTDs) for inclusion in the
2020 Census tabulation geography. State
liaisons will continue to align their
effort with updates from state and local
government officials participating in the
BAS. The VTD/BAS update and
alignment will continue through spring
of 2018. A verification phase will occur
in early 2019 for states that participated
in VTDP.
Phase 3: Delivery of the 2020 Decennial
Census Redistricting Data
By April 1, 2021, the Director of the
Census Bureau will, in accordance with
Title 13, U.S.C., furnish the Governor
and state legislative leaders, both the
majority and minority, with 2020
Census population counts for standard
census tabulation areas (e.g., state,
Congressional district, state legislative
district, AIA, county, city, town, census
tract, census block group, and census
block) regardless of a state’s
participation in Phase 1 or 2. The
Director of the Census Bureau will
provide 2020 Census population counts
for those states participating in Phase 2,
for both the standard tabulation areas
and for VTDs. For each state, this
delivery will occur prior to general
release and no later than April 1, 2021.
Phase 4: Collection of Post-Census
Redistricting Data Plans
The Census Bureau requests from
every state, the newly drawn Legislative
and Congressional district plans and
prepares appropriate data sets based on
new districts. Between the 2010 Census
and the 2020 Census, the effort began in
2011 using the 2010 Census as a
baseline. Beginning in 2021, the Census
Bureau will use the 2020 Census as a
baseline. This effort will occur every
two years in advance of the next Census
in order to update these boundaries
with new or changed plans. A
verification phase will occur with each
update.
Phase 5: Review of the 2020 Census
RDP and Recommendations for the
2030 Census RDP
As the final phase of the 2020 Census
RDP, the Census Bureau will work with
the states to conduct a thorough review
of the RDP. The intent of this review,
and the final report that results, is to
provide guidance to the Secretary and
the Census Bureau Director in planning
the 2030 Census RDP.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Affected Public: All fifty states, the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13, U.S.C.,
Sections 16, 141, and 193.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: October 8, 2015.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–26127 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–853]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Canada: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 8, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the fifth administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on citric
acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid)
from Canada.1 The review covers one
producer and exporter of the subject
merchandise, Jungbunzlauer Canada
Inc. (JBL Canada).
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we made changes to
our margin calculations. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for
JBL Canada is listed below in the ‘‘Final
Results of the Review’’ section of this
notice.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: October 15, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 32342
(June 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results).
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482–
4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 8, 2015, the Department
published the Preliminary Results. We
invited parties to comment on the
preliminary results of the review. We
received a case brief from Archer
Daniels Midland Company, Cargill,
Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle
Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively,
the petitioners) on July 8, 2015, and a
rebuttal brief from JBL Canada on July
13, 2015. The Department conducted
this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is citric acid and certain citrate
salts from Canada. The product is
currently classified under subheadings
2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000,
2918.15.5000, and 3824.90.9290 of the
Harmonized Tariff System of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of merchandise
subject to the scope is dispositive.2
Period of Review
The POR is May 1, 2013, through
April 30, 2014.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by parties in the case
and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues raised is attached to
this notice as Appendix I. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov; the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit
(CRU), Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
2 A full description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the
2013–2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Canada’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary
Results, we recalculated JBL Canada’s
weighted-average dumping margin. Our
calculations are discussed in detail in
the accompanying final calculation
memorandum.3
Final Results of the Review
We determine that a weighted-average
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists
for entries of subject merchandise that
were produced and/or exported by JBL
Canada and that entered, or were
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the POR.
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b). The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to CBP 41 days
after publication of these final results of
review. Because we have calculated a
zero margin for JBL Canada in the final
results of this review, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003.4 This clarification applies
to entries of subject merchandise during
the POR produced by JBL Canada for
which it did not know that the
merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate effective
during the POR if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. See Assessment Policy
Notice for a full discussion of this
clarification.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
3 See Memorandum to the File entitled, ‘‘Final
Results Margin Calculations for Jungbunzlauer
Canada Inc.,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice.
4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62017
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for JBL Canada
will be that established in the final
results of this review, (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not
participating in this review, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a
previous review, or the original lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 23.21
percent, the all-others rate made
effective by the LTFV investigation.5
These deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as the
only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return or destruction of APO
materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice
are published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
5 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Canada and the People’s Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29,
2009)
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
62018
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices
Dated: October 6, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Margin Calculations
V. Discussion of the Issues
1. Fixed Overhead Costs
2. U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses
3. Exclusion of Below-Cost Sales From the
Normal Value Calculation
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–26278 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–952]
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 9, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
2013–2014 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on narrow
woven ribbons with woven selvedge
(‘‘NWR’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’), in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).1 This
review covers one company, Yama
Ribbons Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yama Ribbons’’).2
The Department preliminarily found
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven
Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative
Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 32534 (June 9, 2015)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
64565 (October 30, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). The
Department determined in the underlying
investigation that merchandise produced and
exported by Yama Ribbons is excluded from the
antidumping duty order. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow Woven Ribbons
With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the
People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty
Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as
amended in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic
of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75
FR 56982 (September 17, 2010) (‘‘Order’’). However,
merchandise which Yama exports but did not
produce, as well as merchandise Yama produces
but is exported by another company, remain subject
to the Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
which is hereby incorporated in, and
adopted by, these final results. This
memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://www.trade.gov/
enforcement/. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Background
Appendix List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
that Yama Ribbons did not have
reviewable transactions during the POR.
The Department invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results. No parties commented.
Accordingly, our Preliminary Results
remain unchanged in these final results
of review and are adopted as the final
results of the review.
DATES: Effective Date: October 15, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karine Gziryan and Robert Bolling, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4081 and (202)
482–3434, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Period of Review
The period of review is September 1,
2013, through August 31, 2014.
On June 16, 2015, the Department
published the Preliminary Results in the
Federal Register. We invited interested
parties to submit comments on the
Preliminary Results, but no comments
were received.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge. The merchandise subject to
the order is classifiable under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings
5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030;
5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject
merchandise also may enter under
HTSUS subheadings 5806.31.00;
5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30;
5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 5810.99.90;
5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and
5907.00.80 and under statistical
categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080;
5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product
description in the Order remains
dispositive.3
Methodology
The Department has conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see
Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
3 For
a complete description of the scope of the
order, please see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Narrow Woven Ribbons
With Woven Selvedge from the People’s Republic
of China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance (‘‘Preliminary
Decision Memorandum’’), dated May 29, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted the in Preliminary Results,
Yama Ribbons had no reviewable
transactions of merchandise during the
POR.4 As there are no changes from, or
comments upon, the Preliminary
Results, the Department finds that there
is no reason to modify its analysis.
Therefore, we continue to find that
Yama Ribbons did not have reviewable
transactions during the POR.
Assessment
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review.5 The Department intends
to issue assessment instructions to CBP
15 days after the date of publication of
these final results of review. Pursuant to
the Department’s practice in non-market
economy cases, because Yama Ribbons
had no shipments of the subject
merchandise during the POR, the
Department intends to instruct CBP to
liquidate entries of subject merchandise
that entered under Yama Ribbons’ rate
at the PRC-wide rate of 247.65 percent.
For a full discussion of this practice, see
Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
4 See
5 See
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5.
19 CFR 351.212(b) (1).
15OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 199 (Thursday, October 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62016-62018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26278]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-853]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 8, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the fifth administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts
(citric acid) from Canada.\1\ The review covers one producer and
exporter of the subject merchandise, Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL
Canada).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-
2014, 80 FR 32342 (June 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to
our margin calculations. The final weighted-average dumping margin for
JBL Canada is listed below in the ``Final Results of the Review''
section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: October 15, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution
[[Page 62017]]
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4007 or (202)
482-4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 8, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results.
We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results of the review.
We received a case brief from Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill,
Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively,
the petitioners) on July 8, 2015, and a rebuttal brief from JBL Canada
on July 13, 2015. The Department conducted this administrative review
in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is citric acid and certain
citrate salts from Canada. The product is currently classified under
subheadings 2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000, 2918.15.5000, and 3824.90.9290
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of merchandise subject to the scope
is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in
the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2013-2014
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Citric Acid and Certain
Citrate Salts from Canada'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Review
The POR is May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by parties in the case and rebuttal briefs are
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues
raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov; the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit
(CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we recalculated
JBL Canada's weighted-average dumping margin. Our calculations are
discussed in detail in the accompanying final calculation
memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum to the File entitled, ``Final Results Margin
Calculations for Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc.,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Review
We determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent
exists for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or
exported by JBL Canada and that entered, or were withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption during the POR.
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department intends
to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after
publication of these final results of review. Because we have
calculated a zero margin for JBL Canada in the final results of this
review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003.\4\ This clarification applies to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by JBL Canada for which it did not
know that the merchandise was destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate effective during the POR if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. See Assessment
Policy Notice for a full discussion of this clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment Policy Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for JBL Canada will
be that established in the final results of this review, (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this
review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific
rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original less-
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate
for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 23.21
percent, the all-others rate made effective by the LTFV
investigation.\5\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada and
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703
(May 29, 2009)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as the
only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order
(APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary
information disclosed under APO, which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice are published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
[[Page 62018]]
Dated: October 6, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Margin Calculations
V. Discussion of the Issues
1. Fixed Overhead Costs
2. U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses
3. Exclusion of Below-Cost Sales From the Normal Value
Calculation
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-26278 Filed 10-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
