Certain Personal Transporters, Components Thereof, and Manuals Therefor; Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion for Summary Determination of Violation of Section 337 and, on Review, To Modify the Initial Determination; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding, 61842-61843 [2015-26048]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
61842
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 198 / Wednesday, October 14, 2015 / Notices
International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register on May
7, 2015 (80 FR 26296). The hearing was
held in Washington, DC, on August 13,
2015, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to sections
705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C.
1673d(b)). It completed and filed its
determinations in these investigations
on October 7, 2015. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4565 (October 2015),
entitled Boltless Steel Shelving Units
Prepackaged for Sale From China:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–523 and
731–TA–1259 (Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 7, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–26049 Filed 10–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–935]
Certain Personal Transporters,
Components Thereof, and Manuals
Therefor; Commission Determination
To Review in Part an Initial
Determination Granting Complainant’s
Motion for Summary Determination of
Violation of Section 337 and, on
Review, To Modify the Initial
Determination; Request for Written
Submissions on Remedy, the Public
Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review
in part an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 28) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting complainants’ motion for
summary determination of violation of
section 337 and, on review, to make
certain modifications in the ID.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3115. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Oct 13, 2015
Jkt 238001
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
under section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
(‘‘Section 337’’), on November 10, 2014,
based on a complaint filed by Segway,
Inc. of Bedford, New Hampshire
(‘‘Segway’’) and DEKA Products Limited
Partnership of Manchester, New
Hampshire (‘‘DEKA’’) (collectively,
‘‘Complainants’’). 79 FR 66739–40 (Nov.
10, 2014). The amended complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
Section 337 by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
6,789,640 (‘‘the ’640 patent’’); 7,275,607
(‘‘the ’607 patent’’); and 8,830,048 (‘‘the
’048 patent’’); the claim of U.S. Design
Patent No. D551,722 (‘‘the ’722 design
patent’’); the claim of U.S. Design Patent
No. D551,592 (‘‘the ’592 design patent’’);
and U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX–
7–800–563 by numerous respondents.
Id. In particular, the notice of
investigation named the following
thirteen entities as respondents: Ninebot
Inc., Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology Co.,
Ltd., and PowerUnion (Beijing) Tech Co.
Ltd. (the ‘‘Ninebot Respondents’’);
Robstep Robot Co., Ltd. (‘‘Robstep’’);
Shenzhen INMOTION Technologies Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘INMOTION’’); Tech in the City;
and Freego USA, LLC (‘‘FreeGo USA’’)
(collectively, ‘‘Terminated
Respondents’’); UPTECH Robotics
Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘UPTECH’’);
Beijing Universal Pioneering
Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘U.P.
Technology’’); Beijing Universal
Pioneering Robotics Co., Ltd. (‘‘U.P.
Robotics’’); FreeGo High-Tech
Corporation Limited (‘‘FreeGo China’’);
and EcoBoomer Co. Ltd. (‘‘EcoBoomer’’)
(collectively, ‘‘Defaulting
Respondents’’); and Roboscooters.com
(‘‘Roboscooters’’). The Commission’s
Office of Unfair Import Investigations
was also named as a party.
In the course of the investigation, the
ALJ issued the following IDs with
respect to the Terminated Respondents:
ALJ Order Nos. 13 (Feb. 19, 2015) (not
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reviewed Mar. 18, 2015) (terminating
respondent FreeGo USA by consent
order); 19 (May 4, 2015) (not reviewed
May 20, 2015) (terminating respondent
Robstep by settlement); 23 (Jun. 19,
2015) (not reviewed Jul. 15, 2015)
(terminating respondent INMOTION by
settlement); 24 (Jul. 8, 2015) (not
reviewed Jul. 28, 2015) (terminating
respondent Tech in the City by consent
order); and 27 (Aug. 20, 2015) (not
reviewed Sept. 18, 2015) (terminating
the Ninebot Respondents by settlement).
The ALJ also issued an ID finding all of
the Defaulting Respondents in default.
See ALJ Order No. 20 (May 7, 2015) (not
reviewed May 27, 2015). The sole
remaining respondent Roboscooters
participated in a preliminary
teleconference on December 15, 2014,
filed an answer to the complaint and
notice of investigation (Dec. 31, 2014),
partially responded to one set of
Requests for Document Production, and
produced a corporate witness for
deposition on May 6, 2015, but did not
otherwise participate in the
investigation.
On July 8, 2015, Complainants filed a
motion for summary determination of
violation of Section 337 by defaulting
respondents and respondent
Roboscooters. The Commission
investigative attorney filed a response in
support of the motion. No other
responses were filed.
On August 21, 2015, the ALJ issued
an ID (Order No. 28) granting
Complainants’ motion and making
recommendations regarding remedy and
bonding. The ID finds, inter alia, a
violation of Section 337 under
subsection 337(g)(2) by reason of
infringement of the ’048 patent based on
substantial, reliable, and probative
evidence. 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2). The ID
also finds a violation by the defaulting
respondents and respondent
Roboscooters by reason of infringement
of the ’640 patent, the ’607 patent, the
’722 design patent, the ’592 design
patent, and U.S. Copyright Registration
No. TX–7–800–563. No party petitioned
for review of the ID.
The Commission has determined to
review the ID in part and, on review, to
clarify that the authority for the ALJ to
draw adverse inferences against
respondent Roboscooters for its failures
to act during the investigation and find
Roboscooters in violation is found in
Commission Rule 210.17, 19 CFR
210.17. On review, the Commission also
corrects certain apparent typographical
errors. Specifically, in the last paragraph
on page 45, ‘‘Ex. 19’’ should be
substituted for ‘‘Ex. 9,’’ the ‘‘FreeGo F3’’
should be substituted for the
‘‘WindRunner G1U.’’ Likewise, we
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 198 / Wednesday, October 14, 2015 / Notices
substitute ‘‘Focxess’’ for ‘‘Estway’’ in the
last paragraph on page 60. See ID at 45;
60. Furthermore, we substitute the
clause ‘‘In support of their allegations in
the Complaint that the Gen 2 PT
vehicles practice claims of the Asserted
Utility Patents,’’ for the first clause of
the last sentence on page 65 of the ID.
See ID at 65–66.
In connection with the final
disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that
could result in the exclusion of the
subject articles from entry into the
United States, and/or (2) issue one or
more cease and desist orders that could
result in the respondent being required
to cease and desist from engaging in
unfair acts in the importation and sale
of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving
written submissions that address the
form of remedy, if any, that should be
ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an
article from entry into the United States
for purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
affecting it or are likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain
Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360,
USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some
form of remedy, it must consider the
effects of that remedy upon the public
interest. The factors the Commission
will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist
orders would have on (1) the public
health and welfare, (2) competitive
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
production of articles that are like or
directly competitive with those that are
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the
aforementioned public interest factors
in the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form
of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the
President, has 60 days to approve or
disapprove the Commission’s action.
During this period, the subject articles
would be entitled to enter the United
States under bond, in an amount
determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the
Treasury. The Commission is therefore
interested in receiving submissions
concerning the amount of the bond that
should be imposed if a remedy is
ordered.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Oct 13, 2015
Jkt 238001
Written Submissions: Parties to the
investigation, interested government
agencies, and any other interested
parties are encouraged to file written
submissions on the issues of remedy,
the public interest, and bonding.
Complainants and the IA are also
requested to submit proposed remedial
orders for the Commission’s
consideration. Complainants are further
requested to provide the expiration
dates of each of the asserted patents and
copyright, and state the HTSUS
subheadings under which the accused
articles are imported. Complainants are
also requested to supply the names of
known importers of the infringing
articles. The written submissions and
proposed remedial orders must be filed
no later than the close of business on
October 21, 2015. Reply submissions
must be filed no later than the close of
business on October 28, 2015. Such
submissions should address the ALJ’s
recommended determinations on
remedy and bonding which were made
in Order No. 28. No further submissions
on these issues will be permitted unless
otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
337–TA–935’’) in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See
Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding filing
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document
must also be filed simultaneously with
any confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61843
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 7, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–26048 Filed 10–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Proposed Settlement
Agreement Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
On September 30, 2015, a fullyexecuted proposed Settlement
Agreement was received by the
Department of Justice, among the United
States on behalf of the U.S. Department
of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (‘‘FWS’’), the State of Ohio, on
behalf of the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘OEPA’’), and the
State of Ohio, on behalf of the Ohio
Department of Transportation
(‘‘ODOT’’).
The Settlement Agreement resolves
certain claims by the FWS and OEPA for
natural resource damages with respect
to a portion of the Ottawa River,
primarily located in Lucas County,
Ohio, against ODOT. The Settlement
Agreement requires ODOT to pay
$221,865 to the Department of the
Interior’s Natural Resource Damage
Assessment and Restoration Fund to be
used by the FWS and OEPA, the natural
resource trustees (‘‘Trustees’’) for this
matter, for the joint benefit and use of
the Trustees to pay for Trusteesponsored natural resource restoration
efforts.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Settlement Agreement.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and should refer to United
States’ Settlement Agreement with State
of Ohio Department of Transportation,
D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–09090/3. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 198 (Wednesday, October 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61842-61843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26048]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-935]
Certain Personal Transporters, Components Thereof, and Manuals
Therefor; Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial
Determination Granting Complainant's Motion for Summary Determination
of Violation of Section 337 and, on Review, To Modify the Initial
Determination; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public
Interest, and Bonding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review in part an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 28) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') granting complainants' motion for summary determination of
violation of section 337 and, on review, to make certain modifications
in the ID.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
(``Section 337''), on November 10, 2014, based on a complaint filed by
Segway, Inc. of Bedford, New Hampshire (``Segway'') and DEKA Products
Limited Partnership of Manchester, New Hampshire (``DEKA'')
(collectively, ``Complainants''). 79 FR 66739-40 (Nov. 10, 2014). The
amended complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of Section 337
by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
6,789,640 (``the '640 patent''); 7,275,607 (``the '607 patent''); and
8,830,048 (``the '048 patent''); the claim of U.S. Design Patent No.
D551,722 (``the '722 design patent''); the claim of U.S. Design Patent
No. D551,592 (``the '592 design patent''); and U.S. Copyright
Registration No. TX-7-800-563 by numerous respondents. Id. In
particular, the notice of investigation named the following thirteen
entities as respondents: Ninebot Inc., Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology
Co., Ltd., and PowerUnion (Beijing) Tech Co. Ltd. (the ``Ninebot
Respondents''); Robstep Robot Co., Ltd. (``Robstep''); Shenzhen
INMOTION Technologies Co., Ltd. (``INMOTION''); Tech in the City; and
Freego USA, LLC (``FreeGo USA'') (collectively, ``Terminated
Respondents''); UPTECH Robotics Technology Co., Ltd. (``UPTECH'');
Beijing Universal Pioneering Technology Co., Ltd. (``U.P.
Technology''); Beijing Universal Pioneering Robotics Co., Ltd. (``U.P.
Robotics''); FreeGo High-Tech Corporation Limited (``FreeGo China'');
and EcoBoomer Co. Ltd. (``EcoBoomer'') (collectively, ``Defaulting
Respondents''); and Roboscooters.com (``Roboscooters''). The
Commission's Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also named as a
party.
In the course of the investigation, the ALJ issued the following
IDs with respect to the Terminated Respondents: ALJ Order Nos. 13 (Feb.
19, 2015) (not reviewed Mar. 18, 2015) (terminating respondent FreeGo
USA by consent order); 19 (May 4, 2015) (not reviewed May 20, 2015)
(terminating respondent Robstep by settlement); 23 (Jun. 19, 2015) (not
reviewed Jul. 15, 2015) (terminating respondent INMOTION by
settlement); 24 (Jul. 8, 2015) (not reviewed Jul. 28, 2015)
(terminating respondent Tech in the City by consent order); and 27
(Aug. 20, 2015) (not reviewed Sept. 18, 2015) (terminating the Ninebot
Respondents by settlement). The ALJ also issued an ID finding all of
the Defaulting Respondents in default. See ALJ Order No. 20 (May 7,
2015) (not reviewed May 27, 2015). The sole remaining respondent
Roboscooters participated in a preliminary teleconference on December
15, 2014, filed an answer to the complaint and notice of investigation
(Dec. 31, 2014), partially responded to one set of Requests for
Document Production, and produced a corporate witness for deposition on
May 6, 2015, but did not otherwise participate in the investigation.
On July 8, 2015, Complainants filed a motion for summary
determination of violation of Section 337 by defaulting respondents and
respondent Roboscooters. The Commission investigative attorney filed a
response in support of the motion. No other responses were filed.
On August 21, 2015, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 28) granting
Complainants' motion and making recommendations regarding remedy and
bonding. The ID finds, inter alia, a violation of Section 337 under
subsection 337(g)(2) by reason of infringement of the '048 patent based
on substantial, reliable, and probative evidence. 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2).
The ID also finds a violation by the defaulting respondents and
respondent Roboscooters by reason of infringement of the '640 patent,
the '607 patent, the '722 design patent, the '592 design patent, and
U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX-7-800-563. No party petitioned for
review of the ID.
The Commission has determined to review the ID in part and, on
review, to clarify that the authority for the ALJ to draw adverse
inferences against respondent Roboscooters for its failures to act
during the investigation and find Roboscooters in violation is found in
Commission Rule 210.17, 19 CFR 210.17. On review, the Commission also
corrects certain apparent typographical errors. Specifically, in the
last paragraph on page 45, ``Ex. 19'' should be substituted for ``Ex.
9,'' the ``FreeGo F3'' should be substituted for the ``WindRunner
G1U.'' Likewise, we
[[Page 61843]]
substitute ``Focxess'' for ``Estway'' in the last paragraph on page 60.
See ID at 45; 60. Furthermore, we substitute the clause ``In support of
their allegations in the Complaint that the Gen 2 PT vehicles practice
claims of the Asserted Utility Patents,'' for the first clause of the
last sentence on page 65 of the ID. See ID at 65-66.
In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2)
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the
respondent being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair
acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address
the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks
exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes
other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and
provide information establishing that activities involving other types
of entry either are adversely affecting it or are likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting
Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843
(Dec. 1994) (Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in
the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve
or disapprove the Commission's action. During this period, the subject
articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an
amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of
the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving
submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if
a remedy is ordered.
Written Submissions: Parties to the investigation, interested
government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to
file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding. Complainants and the IA are also requested to submit
proposed remedial orders for the Commission's consideration.
Complainants are further requested to provide the expiration dates of
each of the asserted patents and copyright, and state the HTSUS
subheadings under which the accused articles are imported. Complainants
are also requested to supply the names of known importers of the
infringing articles. The written submissions and proposed remedial
orders must be filed no later than the close of business on October 21,
2015. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of
business on October 28, 2015. Such submissions should address the ALJ's
recommended determinations on remedy and bonding which were made in
Order No. 28. No further submissions on these issues will be permitted
unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day
pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the
investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-935'') in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions
regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A
redacted non-confidential version of the document must also be filed
simultaneously with any confidential filing. All non-confidential
written submissions will be available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 7, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-26048 Filed 10-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
