Export Trade Certificate of Review, 60626-60627 [2015-25449]
Download as PDF
60626
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 194 / Wednesday, October 7, 2015 / Notices
consistent with its practice as follows:
(1) For subject merchandise produced
and exported by Hubei Yuesheng, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for Hubei Yuesheng in the
final results of the NSR; (2) for subject
merchandise exported by Hubei
Yuesheng, but not produced by Hubei
Yuesheng, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate for the PRC-wide entity; and (3)
for subject merchandise produced by
Hubei Yuesheng but not exported by
Hubei Yuesheng, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate applicable to the
exporter.
With respect to Weishan Hongda, a
new shipper respondent, the
Department established a combination
cash deposit rate for this company
consistent with its practice as follows:
(1) For subject merchandise produced
and exported by Weishan Hongda, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for Weishan Hongda in the
final results of the NSR; (2) for subject
merchandise exported by Weishan
Hongda, but not produced by Weishan
Hongda, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate for the PRC-wide entity; and (3)
for subject merchandise produced by
Weishan Hongda but not exported by
Weishan Hongda, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate applicable to the
exporter.
These deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during these
PORs. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing the
preliminary results of these reviews in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1),
751(a)(2)(B)(iv), 751(a)(3), 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), 351.214 and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: September 30, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Bona Fides Analysis
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Oct 06, 2015
Jkt 238001
5. Verification
6. Non-Market-Economy Country Status
7. Surrogate Country
8. Separate Rates
9. Absence of De Jure Control
10. Absence of De Facto Control
11. Separate Rate for a Non-Selected
Company
12. Fair Value Comparisons
13. U.S. Price
14. Normal Value
15. Surrogate Values
16. Currency Conversion
17. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–25412 Filed 10–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Application No. 14–1A004]
Export Trade Certificate of Review
Notice of Issuance of an
Amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review to DFA of California,
Application no. 14–1A004.
ACTION:
The Secretary of Commerce,
through the Office of Trade and
Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, issued an
amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review to DFA of California on
September 17, 2015. The original
Certificate was issued on March 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade
and Economic Analysis, International
Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at etca@trade.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce to issue Export
Trade Certificates of Review. An Export
Trade Certificate of Review protects the
holder and the members identified in
the Certificate from State and Federal
government antitrust actions and from
private treble damage antitrust actions
for the export conduct specified in the
Certificate and carried out in
compliance with its terms and
conditions. The regulations
implementing Title III are found at 15
CFR part 325 (2015). OTEA is issuing
this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b),
which requires the Secretary to publish
a summary of the certificate in the
Federal Register. Under Section 305(a)
of the Act and 15 CFR 325.11(a), any
person aggrieved by the Secretary’s
determination may, within 30 days of
the date of this notice, bring an action
in any appropriate district court of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
United States to set aside the
determination on the ground that the
determination is erroneous.
Description of the Amendment to the
Certificate: Add the following six
companies as Members of DFA’s
Certificate, with respect to the covered
products listed below:
• Walnuts: CR Crain and Sons, Inc.
(Los Molinos, CA); RPC Packing, Inc.
(Porterville, CA); CAPEX (Corning, CA)
• Prunes: Taylor Brothers Farms, Inc
(Yuba City, CA); RPC Packing, Inc.
(Porterville, CA); Sun-Maid Growers of
California (Kingsburg, CA)
• Figs: Fig Garden Packing, Inc.
(Fresno, CA)
DFA’s Export Trade Certificate of
Review complete amended Membership
is listed below:
1. Alpine Pacific Nut Company,
Hughson, CA
2. Andersen & Sons Shelling, Vina, CA
3. Avanti Nut Company, Inc., Stockton,
CA
4. Berberian Nut Company, LLC, Chico,
CA
5. Carriere Family Farms, Inc., Glenn,
CA
6. California Almond Packers and
Exporters (CAPEX), Corning, CA
7. Continente Nut LLC, Oakley, CA
8. C. R. Crain & Sons, Inc., Los Molinos,
CA
9. Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc., Los
Molinos, CA
10. Crisp California Walnuts, Stratford,
CA
11. Diamond Foods, Inc., Stockton, CA
12. Empire Nut Company, Colusa, CA
13. Fig Garden Packing, Inc., Fresno, CA
14. Gold River Orchards, Inc., Escalon,
CA
15. Grower Direct Nut Company,
Hughson, CA
16. GSF Nut Company, Orosi, CA
17. Guerra Nut Shelling Company,
Hollister, CA
18. Hill View Packing Company Inc.,
Gustine, CA
19. Linden Nut Company, Linden, CA
20. Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA
21. Mariani Packing Company, Inc.,
Vacaville, CA
22. Mid Valley Nut Company Inc.,
Hughson, CA
23. National Raisin Company, Fowler,
CA
24. Poindexter Nut Company, Selma,
CA
25. Prima Noce Packing, Linden, CA
26. RPC Packing Inc., Porterville, CA
27. Sacramento Packing, Inc., Yuba City,
CA
28. Sacramento Valley Walnut Growers,
Inc., Yuba City, CA
29. San Joaquin Figs, Inc., Fresno, CA
30. Shoei Foods USA, Inc., Olivehurst,
CA
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 194 / Wednesday, October 7, 2015 / Notices
31. Stapleton-Spence Packing, Gridley,
CA
32. Sun-Maid Growers of California,
Kingsburg, CA
33. Sunsweet Growers Inc., Yuba City,
CA
34. Taylor Brothers Farms, Inc., Yuba
City, CA
35. T.M. Duche Nut Company, Inc.,
Orland, CA
36. Wilbur Packing Company, Inc., Live
Oak, CA
37. Valley Fig Growers, Fresno, CA
Dated: October 1, 2015.
Joseph E. Flynn,
Director, Office of Trade and Economic
Analysis, International Trade Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–25449 Filed 10–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–844]
Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven
Selvedge from Taiwan; Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on narrow
woven ribbons with woven selvedge
from Taiwan. The review covers two
producers/exporters of the subject
merchandise. The Department selected
one mandatory respondent for
individual examination, Roung Shu
Industry Corporation (Roung Shu). The
POR is September 1, 2013, through
August 31, 2014. We preliminarily
determine that sales of subject
merchandise to the United States have
been made at prices below normal value
(NV). We invite all interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective date: October 7, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Crespo or Alice Maldonado, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3693 and (202)
482–4682, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
covers narrow woven ribbons with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Oct 06, 2015
Jkt 238001
woven selvedge.1 The merchandise
subject to this order is classifiable under
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) statistical
categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030;
5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject
merchandise also may enter under
subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20;
5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00;
5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10;
5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80
and under statistical categories
5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080;
5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. The
HTSUS statistical categories and
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
merchandise covered by this order is
dispositive.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Export price is
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
topics included in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is attached as an
Appendix to this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://trade.gov/
enforcement. The signed and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
The statute and the Department’s
regulations do not address what rate to
apply to respondents not selected for
1 For a complete description of the scope of the
Order, see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Narrow Woven
Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan,’’ from
Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60627
individual examination when the
Department limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
the Department looks to section
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides
instructions for calculating the allothers rate in an investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for
non-selected respondents that are not
examined individually in an
administrative review. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the allothers rate should be calculated by
averaging the weighted-average
dumping margins for individuallyexamined respondents, excluding rates
that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available. Section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that,
where all rates are zero, de minimis, or
based entirely on facts available, the
Department may use ‘‘any reasonable
method’’ for assigning a rate to nonexamined respondents.
For these preliminary results, we
calculated a zero margin for Roung Shu.
Therefore, we preliminarily determine
that, consistent with section
735(c)(5)(B), we will assign A-Madeus
Textile Ltd. (A-Madeus), the respondent
not selected for individual examination,
the most recent above de minimis
margin calculated for a mandatory
respondent, which is from the previous
administrative review. As discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
this is consistent with the Department’s
practice and the documented history of
dumping in this case since the
imposition of the order. Using this
method, we are preliminarily assigning
a margin of 30.64 percent to A-Madeus
for these preliminary results.2
Preliminary Results of the Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist:
Producer/exporter
Roung Shu Industry Corporation (Roung Shu) .......
A-Madeus Textile Ltd. (AMadeus) ............................
Dumping
margin
(percent)
0.00
30.64
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose
the calculations performed in
connection with these preliminary
results to interested parties within five
2 This margin is from the 2012–2013
administrative review. See Narrow Woven Ribbons
With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan; Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 80 FR 19635 (April 13, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 194 (Wednesday, October 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60626-60627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25449]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Application No. 14-1A004]
Export Trade Certificate of Review
ACTION: Notice of Issuance of an Amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review to DFA of California, Application no. 14-1A004.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce, through the Office of Trade and
Economic Analysis (``OTEA'') of the International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, issued an amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review to DFA of California on September 17, 2015. The original
Certificate was issued on March 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of
Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration, (202)
482-5131 (this is not a toll-free number) or email at etca@trade.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of the Export Trading Company Act
of 1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001-21) authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to
issue Export Trade Certificates of Review. An Export Trade Certificate
of Review protects the holder and the members identified in the
Certificate from State and Federal government antitrust actions and
from private treble damage antitrust actions for the export conduct
specified in the Certificate and carried out in compliance with its
terms and conditions. The regulations implementing Title III are found
at 15 CFR part 325 (2015). OTEA is issuing this notice pursuant to 15
CFR 325.6(b), which requires the Secretary to publish a summary of the
certificate in the Federal Register. Under Section 305(a) of the Act
and 15 CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by the Secretary's
determination may, within 30 days of the date of this notice, bring an
action in any appropriate district court of the United States to set
aside the determination on the ground that the determination is
erroneous.
Description of the Amendment to the Certificate: Add the following
six companies as Members of DFA's Certificate, with respect to the
covered products listed below:
Walnuts: CR Crain and Sons, Inc. (Los Molinos, CA); RPC
Packing, Inc. (Porterville, CA); CAPEX (Corning, CA)
Prunes: Taylor Brothers Farms, Inc (Yuba City, CA); RPC
Packing, Inc. (Porterville, CA); Sun-Maid Growers of California
(Kingsburg, CA)
Figs: Fig Garden Packing, Inc. (Fresno, CA)
DFA's Export Trade Certificate of Review complete amended
Membership is listed below:
1. Alpine Pacific Nut Company, Hughson, CA
2. Andersen & Sons Shelling, Vina, CA
3. Avanti Nut Company, Inc., Stockton, CA
4. Berberian Nut Company, LLC, Chico, CA
5. Carriere Family Farms, Inc., Glenn, CA
6. California Almond Packers and Exporters (CAPEX), Corning, CA
7. Continente Nut LLC, Oakley, CA
8. C. R. Crain & Sons, Inc., Los Molinos, CA
9. Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc., Los Molinos, CA
10. Crisp California Walnuts, Stratford, CA
11. Diamond Foods, Inc., Stockton, CA
12. Empire Nut Company, Colusa, CA
13. Fig Garden Packing, Inc., Fresno, CA
14. Gold River Orchards, Inc., Escalon, CA
15. Grower Direct Nut Company, Hughson, CA
16. GSF Nut Company, Orosi, CA
17. Guerra Nut Shelling Company, Hollister, CA
18. Hill View Packing Company Inc., Gustine, CA
19. Linden Nut Company, Linden, CA
20. Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA
21. Mariani Packing Company, Inc., Vacaville, CA
22. Mid Valley Nut Company Inc., Hughson, CA
23. National Raisin Company, Fowler, CA
24. Poindexter Nut Company, Selma, CA
25. Prima Noce Packing, Linden, CA
26. RPC Packing Inc., Porterville, CA
27. Sacramento Packing, Inc., Yuba City, CA
28. Sacramento Valley Walnut Growers, Inc., Yuba City, CA
29. San Joaquin Figs, Inc., Fresno, CA
30. Shoei Foods USA, Inc., Olivehurst, CA
[[Page 60627]]
31. Stapleton-Spence Packing, Gridley, CA
32. Sun-Maid Growers of California, Kingsburg, CA
33. Sunsweet Growers Inc., Yuba City, CA
34. Taylor Brothers Farms, Inc., Yuba City, CA
35. T.M. Duche Nut Company, Inc., Orland, CA
36. Wilbur Packing Company, Inc., Live Oak, CA
37. Valley Fig Growers, Fresno, CA
Dated: October 1, 2015.
Joseph E. Flynn,
Director, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-25449 Filed 10-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P