Certain Steel Grating From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 60120-60121 [2015-25296]

Download as PDF 60120 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Notices by this notice, provides a full description of the scope of the order.3 The Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Decision Memorandum. The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to Section 752(c)(3) of the Act, the Department determines that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted-average dumping margins up to 145.18 percent. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with 3 For a full description of the scope of the order, including exclusions, see the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Grating from the People’s Republic of China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’). 18:34 Oct 02, 2015 Jkt 238001 Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–25301 Filed 10–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–948] Certain Steel Grating From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain steel grating (steel grating) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, Office VII, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1398. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Analysis of Comments Received VerDate Sep<11>2014 sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Background On July 23, 2010, the Department published the CVD Order on steel grating from the PRC.1 On June 1, 2015, the Department published a notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the CVD Order on steel grating from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On June 15, 2015, Metal Grating Coalition and its individual members, Alabama Metal Industries Corporation, Fisher & Ludlow, Inc., Harsco Industrial IKG, Interstate Gratings, LLC, and Ohio Gratings, Inc. (collectively, MGC) filed a notice of intent to participate in the review.3 Metal Grating Corporation 1 See Certain Steel Grating from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 75 FR 43144 (July 23, 2010) (CVD Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year ‘‘Sunset’’ Reviews, 80 FR 31012 (June 1, 2015). 3 See Letter to the Department, ‘‘Certain Steel Grating from the People’s Republic of China: Notice PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(F) of the Act, as an association of domestic producers of the domestic like product.4 The domestic producers comprising the association claimed interested party status pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act. The Department received an adequate substantive response from the domestic industry within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive a response from the Government of the PRC (GOC) or any respondent interested party to the proceeding. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(l)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited review of this CVD Order on steel grating. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this CVD Order is steel grating. Imports of merchandise included within the scope of this order are currently classifiable under subheading 7308.90.7000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice, provides a full description of the scope of the order.5 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The issues discussed include the likelihood of continuation of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review, Entry of Appearance, and APO Application,’’ (June 15, 2015). 4 See Letter to the Department, ‘‘Certain Steel Grating from the People’s Republic of China: Substantive Response to Notice Initiating Sunset Review,’’ (July 1, 2015) (MGC’s Substantive Response). 5 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Steel Grating from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1 60121 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Notices or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy rate likely to prevail if the CVD Order were revoked. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the CVD Order on steel grating from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a net countervailable subsidy at the rates listed below: Manufacturers/ Exporters/ Producers Net countervailable subsidy (percent) 62.46 62.46 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. The Department is issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: September 28, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–25296 Filed 10–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [C–570–963] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Effective Date: October 5, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, Office VII, AD/ CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–5255. Potassium Phosphate Salts From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order AGENCY: Jkt 238001 Background On July 22, 2010, the Department published the CVD order on Salts from the PRC.1 On June 1, 2015, the Department published a notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the CVD Order on Salts from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On June 11, 2015, ICL Performance Products, LP and Prayon, Inc. (collectively, Petitioners) filed a notice of intent to participate in the review.3 Petitioners claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as domestic producers of the domestic like product.4 The Department received an adequate substantive response from the domestic industry within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive a response from the Government of the People’s Republic of China (GOC) or any respondent interested party to the proceeding. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(l)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of this CVD Order on Salts. Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 75 FR 42682 (July 22, 2010) (CVD Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year ‘‘Sunset’’ Reviews, 80 FR 31012 (June 1, 2015). 3 See Letter to the Department, ‘‘Potassium Phosphate Salts from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Intent to Participate and APO application,’’ dated June 11, 2015. 4 On July 1, 2015, ICL Performance Products, LP and Prayon, Inc. both claimed to be domestic producers of phosphate salts. See Letter to the Department, ‘‘Potassium Phosphate Salts from the People’s Republic of China: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of Five Year (First Sunset) Review of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders,’’ dated July 1, 2015, (Petitioners’ Substantive Response). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this CVD Order is Salts. Imports of merchandise included within the scope of this order are currently classifiable under subheadings 2835.24.0000 and 2835.39.1000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice, provides a full description of the scope of the order.5 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The issues discussed include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy rate likely to prevail if the CVD Order were revoked. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the CVD Order on Salts from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a net countervailable subsidy at the rates listed below: Manufacturers/ exporters/ producers 1 See International Trade Administration 18:34 Oct 02, 2015 DATES: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Ningbo Jiulong Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd ..... All Others .............................. VerDate Sep<11>2014 on potassium phosphate salts (Salts) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Lianyungang Mupro Import Export Co Ltd .................... Mianyang Aostar Phosphate Chemical Industry Co. Ltd Shifang Anda Chemicals Co. Ltd ..................................... All Others .............................. Net countervailable subsidy (percent) 109.11 109.11 109.11 109.11 5 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Potassium Phosphate Salts from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 192 (Monday, October 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60120-60121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-948]


Certain Steel Grating From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty 
Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) finds that revocation 
of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain steel grating (steel 
grating) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the 
levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of 
this notice.

DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, Office VII, AD/CVD 
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
1398.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 23, 2010, the Department published the CVD Order on steel 
grating from the PRC.\1\ On June 1, 2015, the Department published a 
notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the CVD Order on 
steel grating from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\ On June 15, 2015, Metal Grating 
Coalition and its individual members, Alabama Metal Industries 
Corporation, Fisher & Ludlow, Inc., Harsco Industrial IKG, Interstate 
Gratings, LLC, and Ohio Gratings, Inc. (collectively, MGC) filed a 
notice of intent to participate in the review.\3\ Metal Grating 
Corporation claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(F) of 
the Act, as an association of domestic producers of the domestic like 
product.\4\ The domestic producers comprising the association claimed 
interested party status pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Steel Grating from the People's Republic of 
China: Countervailing Duty Order, 75 FR 43144 (July 23, 2010) (CVD 
Order).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year ``Sunset'' Reviews, 80 FR 31012 
(June 1, 2015).
    \3\ See Letter to the Department, ``Certain Steel Grating from 
the People's Republic of China: Notice of Intent to Participate in 
Sunset Review, Entry of Appearance, and APO Application,'' (June 15, 
2015).
    \4\ See Letter to the Department, ``Certain Steel Grating from 
the People's Republic of China: Substantive Response to Notice 
Initiating Sunset Review,'' (July 1, 2015) (MGC's Substantive 
Response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department received an adequate substantive response from the 
domestic industry within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive a response from the 
Government of the PRC (GOC) or any respondent interested party to the 
proceeding. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act 
and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(l)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2), the Department conducted 
an expedited review of this CVD Order on steel grating.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to this CVD Order is steel grating. Imports 
of merchandise included within the scope of this order are currently 
classifiable under subheading 7308.90.7000 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States. The Issues and Decision Memorandum, 
which is hereby adopted by this notice, provides a full description of 
the scope of the order.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Department Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum 
for the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the 
Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Steel Grating from the People's 
Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and 
in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of 
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum. The issues discussed include the likelihood of 
continuation

[[Page 60121]]

or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable 
subsidy rate likely to prevail if the CVD Order were revoked.

Final Results of Sunset Review

    Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine 
that revocation of the CVD Order on steel grating from the PRC would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a net countervailable 
subsidy at the rates listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Net
                                                         countervailable
          Manufacturers/ Exporters/ Producers                subsidy
                                                            (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ningbo Jiulong Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd........          62.46
All Others.............................................          62.46
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.
    The Department is issuing and publishing these final results and 
this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.

    Dated: September 28, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-25296 Filed 10-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P