Silicomanganese From Australia: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 57787-57789 [2015-24449]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 186 / Friday, September 25, 2015 / Notices
a first come, first serve basis. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms.
Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@
bis.doc.gov, no later than October 21,
2015.
A limited number of seats will be
available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the
extent time permits, members of the
public may present oral statements to
the Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
distribution of public presentation
materials to Committee members, the
Committee suggests that public
presentation materials or comments be
forwarded before the meeting to Ms.
Springer.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel,
formally determined on March 23, 2015,
pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5
U.S.C. app. 2 (l0)(d))), that the portion
of the meeting concerning trade secrets
and commercial or financial information
deemed privileged or confidential as
described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and the
portion of the meeting concerning
matters the disclosure of which would
be likely to frustrate significantly
implementation of an agency action as
described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 sections 10(a)(1) and l0(a)(3). The
remaining portions of the meeting will
be open to the public.
For more information, call Yvette
Springer at (202) 482–2813.
Dated: September 21, 2016.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–24365 Filed 9–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT– P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Emerging Technology and Research
Advisory Committee; Notice of
Partially Closed Meeting
The Emerging Technology and
Research Advisory Committee (ETRAC)
will meet on October 15–16, 2015, 8:45
a.m., Room 3884, at the Herbert C.
Hoover Building, 14th Street between
Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues
NW., Washington, DC. The Committee
advises the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration on
emerging technology and research
activities, including those related to
deemed exports.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:58 Sep 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
For more information, call Yvette
Springer at (202) 482–2813.
Agenda
Thursday, October 15
Open Session
1. Welcome and Introductions
2. Discussion and Reports—
Wassenaar Arrangement 2013 Plenary
Agreements Implementation: Intrusion
and Surveillance items proposed
technology control under ECCN 4E001.c
3. Background of the Proposed Rule
4. Review of Public Comments on the
Proposed Rule
5. Presentations by industry and
individuals on proposed ECCN 4E001.c
entry to control ‘‘technology for the
development of intrusion software’’
6. Comments from the Public
participating in person or by telephone
7. Presentation on CRISPR/Cas9
concept of editing genes
8. Continued discussions on ECCN
4E001.c
Friday, October 16
Closed Session
9. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 sections 10(a)(1) and l0(a)(3).
The open sessions will be accessible
via teleconference to 25 participants on
a first come, first serve basis. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms.
Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@
bis.doc.gov no later than, October 8,
2015.
A limited number of seats will be
available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the
extent that time permits, members of the
public may present oral statements to
the Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
the distribution of public presentation
materials to the Committee members,
the Committee suggests that presenters
forward the public presentation
materials prior to the meeting to Ms.
Springer via email.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel,
formally determined on February 25,
2015, pursuant to section l0(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended, that the portion of the
meeting dealing with matters the of
which would be likely to frustrate
significantly implementation of a
proposed agency action as described in
5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (9) (B) shall be exempt
from the provisions relating to public
meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2
sections 10(a)1 and 10(a) (3). The
remaining portions of the meeting will
be open to the public.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
57787
Sfmt 4703
Dated: September 21, 2015.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–24390 Filed 9–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–602–808]
Silicomanganese From Australia:
Preliminary Affirmative Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) preliminarily
determines that silicomanganese from
Australia is being, or is likely to be, sold
in the United States at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’), as provided in section
733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’). The period of
investigation is January 1, 2014 through
December 31, 2014. The estimated
weighted-average dumping margins are
shown in the ‘‘Preliminary
Determination’’ section of this notice.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES:
Effective Date: September 25,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Magd Zalok or Robert Bolling, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4162 or (202) 482–
3434, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the notice
of initiation of this investigation on
March 17, 2015.1 Pursuant to section
733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department
postponed this preliminary LTFV
determination by a period of 50 days.2
1 See Silicomanganese From Australia: Initiation
of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation, 80 FR 13829
(March 17, 2015).
2 See Silicomanganese From Australia:
Postponement of Preliminary Determination of
Antidumping Duty Investigation, 80 FR 35304 (June
19, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
57788
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 186 / Friday, September 25, 2015 / Notices
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers
all forms, sizes and compositions of
silicomanganese, except low-carbon
silicomanganese, including
silicomanganese briquettes, fines, and
slag. Silicomanganese is properly
classifiable under subheading
7202.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Low-carbon
silicomanganese is excluded from the
scope of this investigation. Low-carbon
silicomanganese is classifiable under
HTSUS subheading 7202.30.0000. The
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The
written description of the scope is
dispositive. A full description of the
scope of the investigation is contained
in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is made available to the
public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the
Department’s Central Records Unit,
located at room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum3
can be found at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
All Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
provides that the estimated ‘‘all others’’
rate shall be an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero or de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act. Pursuant to
section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, if the
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins established for all exporters and
producers individually examined are
zero, de minimis, or determined based
entirely under section 776 of the Act,
the Department may use any reasonable
method to establish the estimated
dumping margin for all other producers
or exporters.
We based our calculation of the ‘‘All
Others’’ rate on the margin calculated
for Tasmanian Electro Metallurgical
Company Pty Ltd. (‘‘TEMCO’’), the only
mandatory respondent in this
investigation.
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist:
Weighted-average
dumping margin
(percent)
Producer or exporter
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Tasmanian Electro Metallurgical Company Pty Ltd ....................................................................................................................
All Others .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Disclosure and Public Comment
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of any
public announcement of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Case briefs or other written comments
may be submitted to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance no later than seven days
after the date on which the final
verification report is issued in this
proceeding. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in case briefs, may be
submitted no later than five days after
the deadline date for case briefs.4
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance within 30 days of the
date of publication of this notice.
Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues parties intend to discuss.
Issues raised in the hearing will be
limited to those raised in the respective
case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for
a hearing is made, the Department
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, at a date and
time to be determined. See 19 CFR
351.310(d). Parties should confirm by
telephone the date, time, and location of
the hearing two days before the
scheduled date.
3 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determination in the Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Silicomanganese from Australia,’’
dated concurrently with this notice. A list of the
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum appears in Appendix I, below.
4 See 19 CFR 351.309.
5 See 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2) and (e); See also See
Letter from TEMCO, ‘‘Silicomanganese from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:58 Sep 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
Postponement of Final Determination
and Extension of Provisional Measures
We received a request from the
mandatory respondent, TEMCO, that we
postpone the final determination and
extend the application of the
provisional measures prescribed under
section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11.93
11.93
351.210(e)(2), from a four-month period
to a six-month period. Accordingly, we
are postponing our final determination
no later than 135 days after the date of
publication of this preliminary
determination, pursuant to section
735(a)(2) of the Act.5 The suspension of
liquidation described below will be
extended accordingly.6
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
of the Act, we are directing U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to suspend liquidation of all entries of
silicomanganese from Australia as
described in the scope of the
investigation section entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), we will
instruct CBP to require a cash deposit
equal to the weighted-average amount
by which the NV exceeds CEP as
Australia: Request for Postponement of Final
Determination,’’ dated September 8, 2015.
6 Id.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 186 / Friday, September 25, 2015 / Notices
indicated in the chart above.7 These
suspension of liquidation instructions
will remain in effect until further notice.
International Trade Commission
(‘‘ITC’’) Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our
preliminary affirmative determination of
sales at LTFV. Because the preliminary
determination in this proceeding is
affirmative, section 735(b)(2) of the Act
requires that the ITC make its final
determination as to whether the
domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports of
silicomanganese from Australia before
the later of 120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days
after our final determination. Because
we are postponing the deadline for our
final determination to 135 days from the
date of publication of this preliminary
determination, as discussed above, the
ITC will make its final determination no
later than 45 days after our final
determination.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: September 17, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Investigation
4. Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
5. Postponement of Final Determination and
Extension of Provisional Measures
6. Scope of the Investigation
7. Scope Comments
8. Discussion of Methodology
Fair Value Comparisons
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
9. Product Comparisons
10. Date of Sale
11. Constructed Export Price
12. Normal Value
A. Comparison Market Viability
B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test
C. Level of Trade
D. Cost of Production (COP)
a. Calculation of COP
b. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
c. Results of the COP Test
7 See Modification of Regulations Regarding the
Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional
Measures Period in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:58 Sep 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
CV
13. Currency Conversion
14. U.S. International Trade Commission
Notification
15. Disclosure and Public Comments
16. Verification
17. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2015–24449 Filed 9–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
57789
the final judgment in this case is not in
harmony with the Department’s
amended final results of review and is
amending the AR 1 Final Results with
respect to the margin determined for
Jiangsu Chengde Steel Tube Share Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Chengde’’), an exporter and
producer of subject merchandise.
DATES: Effective Date: September 7,
2015.
Paul
Stolz, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Subsequent to the publication of the AR
1 Final Results, Chengde filed a
complaint with the CIT challenging
aspects of the methodology used to
determine its margin in the AR 1 Final
Results.
On September 26, 2014, the CIT
issued the Remand Order, instructing
the Department to re-visit its decision to
value most of Chengde’s billet as alloy
steel in the underlying review.
Specifically with respect to Chengde’s
billets, the Court instructed the
Department to: (1) Reevaluate the
chemical composition of OCTG sold in
certain contracts, (2) explain whether
Chengde’s mill test certificates prove the
chemical properties of OCTG not
specifically covered by those
certificates, (3) assess whether
Chengde’s entry summary as provided
in American Tubular Products, LLC’s
application to receive information under
administrative protective order proves
that the OCTG in one contract was
comprised of carbon steel, and (4)
recalculate the percentage of Chengde’s
steel billets that were alloy steel or
carbon steel in accordance with this
analysis.4 In addition, at the
Department’s request, the CIT remanded
the additional issue of the surrogate
value used to value carbon steel billets
to reconsider whether it is aberrational.5
On January 28, 2015, the Department
issued its Remand Redetermination.
Consistent with the CIT’s instructions in
the Remand Order, the Department
recalculated the total quantity of carbon
steel billets consumed by Chengde to
produce subject merchandise during the
period of review and explained why the
surrogate value used for carbon steel
billets in the AR 1 Final Results was not
aberrational.6
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–943]
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From the People’s Republic of China;
Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony With Final Results of
Administrative Review and Notice of
Amended Final Results of
Administrative Review Pursuant to
Court Decision
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 28, 2015, the
United States Court of International
Trade (‘‘CIT’’) issued its final judgment 1
sustaining the Department of
Commerce’s (the ‘‘Department’’)
redetermination 2 issued pursuant to the
CIT’s remand order in American
Tubular Products, LLC v. United States,
Ct. No. 13–00029, Slip Op. 14–116 (CIT
September 26, 2014) (‘‘Remand Order’’),
with respect to the Department’s
amended final results 3 of the 2010–
2011 antidumping duty administrative
review of certain oil country tubular
goods (‘‘OCTG’’) from the People’s
Republic of China. Consistent with the
decision of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United
States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
(‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the
Department is notifying the public that
AGENCY:
1 See American Tubular Products., LLC v. United
States, Court No. 13–00029, Slip Op. 15–98 (CIT
August 28, 2015) (‘‘ATP’’).
2 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Remand, American Tubular Products, LLC
v. United States, Court No. 13–00029 (January 28,
2015) (‘‘Remand Redetermination’’).
3 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–
2011, 77 FR 74644 (December 17, 2012), as
amended by, Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
From the People’s Republic of China: Amended
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2010–2011, 78 FR 9033 (February 7, 2013)
(collectively, ‘‘AR 1 Final Results’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4 See
Remand Order at 14.
at 16–17.
6 See Remand Redetermination at 2.
5 Id.
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 186 (Friday, September 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57787-57789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24449]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-602-808]
Silicomanganese From Australia: Preliminary Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of
Final Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') preliminarily
determines that silicomanganese from Australia is being, or is likely
to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (``LTFV''), as
provided in section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
``Act''). The period of investigation is January 1, 2014 through
December 31, 2014. The estimated weighted-average dumping margins are
shown in the ``Preliminary Determination'' section of this notice.
Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective Date: September 25, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magd Zalok or Robert Bolling, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4162 or (202) 482-3434, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the notice of initiation of this
investigation on March 17, 2015.\1\ Pursuant to section 733(c)(1)(A) of
the Act, the Department postponed this preliminary LTFV determination
by a period of 50 days.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Silicomanganese From Australia: Initiation of Less-Than-
Fair-Value Investigation, 80 FR 13829 (March 17, 2015).
\2\ See Silicomanganese From Australia: Postponement of
Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 80 FR
35304 (June 19, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 57788]]
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers all forms, sizes and
compositions of silicomanganese, except low-carbon silicomanganese,
including silicomanganese briquettes, fines, and slag. Silicomanganese
is properly classifiable under subheading 7202.30.0000 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Low-carbon
silicomanganese is excluded from the scope of this investigation. Low-
carbon silicomanganese is classifiable under HTSUS subheading
7202.30.0000. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. The written description of the scope is dispositive.
A full description of the scope of the investigation is contained in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to
all parties in the Department's Central Records Unit, located at room
B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum\3\ can be found
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, ``Decision Memorandum
for the Preliminary Determination in the Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Silicomanganese from Australia,'' dated
concurrently with this notice. A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum appears in Appendix I, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
All Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated ``all
others'' rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters
and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de
minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776
of the Act. Pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, if the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for all
exporters and producers individually examined are zero, de minimis, or
determined based entirely under section 776 of the Act, the Department
may use any reasonable method to establish the estimated dumping margin
for all other producers or exporters.
We based our calculation of the ``All Others'' rate on the margin
calculated for Tasmanian Electro Metallurgical Company Pty Ltd.
(``TEMCO''), the only mandatory respondent in this investigation.
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Producer or exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tasmanian Electro Metallurgical Company Pty Ltd..... 11.93
All Others.......................................... 11.93
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of any
public announcement of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than
seven days after the date on which the final verification report is
issued in this proceeding. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in
case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the
deadline date for case briefs.\4\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's
name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and
(3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the
hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and
rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and
time to be determined. See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Parties should confirm by
telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before
the scheduled date.
Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
We received a request from the mandatory respondent, TEMCO, that we
postpone the final determination and extend the application of the
provisional measures prescribed under section 733(d) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(e)(2), from a four-month period to a six-month period.
Accordingly, we are postponing our final determination no later than
135 days after the date of publication of this preliminary
determination, pursuant to section 735(a)(2) of the Act.\5\ The
suspension of liquidation described below will be extended
accordingly.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2) and (e); See also See Letter from
TEMCO, ``Silicomanganese from Australia: Request for Postponement of
Final Determination,'' dated September 8, 2015.
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, we are directing
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to suspend liquidation of
all entries of silicomanganese from Australia as described in the scope
of the investigation section entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
Pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d),
we will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the weighted-
average amount by which the NV exceeds CEP as
[[Page 57789]]
indicated in the chart above.\7\ These suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of
Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Trade Commission (``ITC'') Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of our preliminary affirmative determination of sales at LTFV.
Because the preliminary determination in this proceeding is
affirmative, section 735(b)(2) of the Act requires that the ITC make
its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the
United States is materially injured, or threatened with material
injury, by reason of imports of silicomanganese from Australia before
the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination
or 45 days after our final determination. Because we are postponing the
deadline for our final determination to 135 days from the date of
publication of this preliminary determination, as discussed above, the
ITC will make its final determination no later than 45 days after our
final determination.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: September 17, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Investigation
4. Postponement of Preliminary Determination
5. Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
6. Scope of the Investigation
7. Scope Comments
8. Discussion of Methodology
Fair Value Comparisons
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
9. Product Comparisons
10. Date of Sale
11. Constructed Export Price
12. Normal Value
A. Comparison Market Viability
B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test
C. Level of Trade
D. Cost of Production (COP)
a. Calculation of COP
b. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
c. Results of the COP Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on CV
13. Currency Conversion
14. U.S. International Trade Commission Notification
15. Disclosure and Public Comments
16. Verification
17. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2015-24449 Filed 9-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P