Certain Document Cameras and Software for use Therewith Notice of Institution of Investigation, 57642 [2015-24221]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
57642
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 185 / Thursday, September 24, 2015 / Notices
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: September 18, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–24222 Filed 9–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–967]
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2015).
Certain Document Cameras and
Software for use Therewith Notice of
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
August 20, 2015, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Pathway
Innovations & Technologies, Inc. of San
Diego, California. A supplement was
filed on August 31, 2015. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain document cameras and software
for use therewith by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. D647,906 (‘‘the ’D906
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. D674,389 (‘‘the
’D389 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
D715,300 (‘‘the ’D300 patent’’); and U.S.
Patent No. 8,508,751 (‘‘the ’751 patent’’).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Sep 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
September 17, 2015, ORDERED THAT—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain document
cameras and software for use therewith
by reason of infringement of one or
more of the claim of the ’D906 patent;
the claim of the ’D389 patent; the claim
of the ’D300 patent; and claims 1–18
and 20 of the ’751 patent, and whether
an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant:
Pathway Innovations & Technologies,
Inc., 10211 Pacific Mesa Boulevard,
Ste. 412, San Diego, CA 92121
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Recordex USA, Inc., 10–50 46th
Avenue, Long Island City, NY 11101
QOMO HiteVision, LLC, 46950
Magellan Drive, Wixom, MI 48393
Adesso, Inc., 160 Commerce Way,
Walnut, CA 91789
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 18, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–24221 Filed 9–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 185 (Thursday, September 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 57642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24221]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-967]
Certain Document Cameras and Software for use Therewith Notice of
Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 20, 2015, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Pathway Innovations & Technologies, Inc. of San Diego, California. A
supplement was filed on August 31, 2015. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain document
cameras and software for use therewith by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No. D647,906 (``the 'D906 patent''); U.S.
Patent No. D674,389 (``the 'D389 patent''); U.S. Patent No. D715,300
(``the 'D300 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,508,751 (``the '751
patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2015).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on September 17, 2015, ORDERED THAT--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain document
cameras and software for use therewith by reason of infringement of one
or more of the claim of the 'D906 patent; the claim of the 'D389
patent; the claim of the 'D300 patent; and claims 1-18 and 20 of the
'751 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant:
Pathway Innovations & Technologies, Inc., 10211 Pacific Mesa Boulevard,
Ste. 412, San Diego, CA 92121
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Recordex USA, Inc., 10-50 46th Avenue, Long Island City, NY 11101
QOMO HiteVision, LLC, 46950 Magellan Drive, Wixom, MI 48393
Adesso, Inc., 160 Commerce Way, Walnut, CA 91789
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 18, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-24221 Filed 9-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
