Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 7018, 55888-55891 [2015-23289]
Download as PDF
55888
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Notices
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
In particular, the Exchange’s proposal
to increase the Linkage Routing fee from
$0.65 per contract to $0.70 per contract
is reasonable because such increase will
help offset the costs associated with
routing orders through Linkage and
paying the transaction fees for such
executions at other exchanges. The
Exchange believes the proposed
increase is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it will apply to
all orders routed via Linkage.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
C2 does not believe that the proposed
rule change will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. In particular, the
increase to the Linkage Routing Fee will
apply equally to all orders routed via
linkage and will help offset costs
associated with routing orders via
linkage. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed change to the Linkage
Routing fee will impose any burden on
17:30 Sep 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fees Schedule. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to increase the
Linkage Routing fee from $0.65 per
contract to $0.70 per contract in
addition to the applicable C2 taker fee.
The Linkage Routing fee is assessed to
all orders routed pursuant to the
Options Order Protection and Locked/
Crossed Market Plan. The purpose of the
proposed change is to help offset the
costs associated with routing orders
through Linkage and paying the
transaction fees for such executions at
other exchanges.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because it
only applies to trading on the Exchange
[sic] and orders sent from the Exchange
to other exchanges via Linkage. Should
the proposed change make C2 a more
attractive trading venue for market
participants at other exchanges, such
market participants may elect to become
market participants at C2.
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 3 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 4 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–C2–
2015–023 and should be submitted on
or before October 8, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.5
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–23287 Filed 9–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–75904; File No. SR–BX–
2015–056]
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
C2–2015–023 on the subject line.
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Exchange Rule 7018
Paper Comments
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 1, 2015, NASDAQ OMX BX,
Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2015–023. This file
number should be included on the
September 11, 2015.
5 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
1 15
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Notices
rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
fee schedule under Exchange Rule
7018(a) with respect to execution and
routing of orders in securities priced at
$1 or more per share and to amend a
credit under BX Rule 7018(e).
While the changes proposed herein
are effective upon filing, the Exchange
has designated that the amendments be
operative on September 1, 2015.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s Web
site at https://
nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend
the fee schedule under BX Rule 7018(a),
relating to charges and credits provided
for orders in securities priced and $1 or
more per share that execute on BX, as
well as to reduce a credit provided in
connection with the Retail Price
Improvement (‘‘RPI’’) program under BX
Rule 7018(e).
Under BX Rule 7018(a), the Exchange
provides credits to member firms that
access certain levels of liquidity on BX
per month. The Exchange is proposing
to amend several of the credit tiers for
orders that access liquidity (excluding
orders with midpoint pegging and
excluding orders that receive price
improvement and execute against an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Sep 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
order with midpoint pegging), as well as
modify the criteria for receiving certain
of the credits. The Exchange also
proposes a few minor changes made for
the purposes of clarity and conformity.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
add a new credit tier of $0.0016 per
share executed, which will be provided
for orders that access liquidity,
excluding orders with midpoint
pegging 3 and orders that receive price
improvement and execute against an
order with midpoint pegging, entered by
a member that accesses liquidity equal
to or exceeding 0.15% of total
consolidated volume 4 (‘‘Consolidated
Volume’’) during a month. Additionally,
the Exchange proposes to amend the
credit tier of $0.0015 per share
executed, which is provided for orders
that access liquidity, excluding orders
with midpoint pegging and orders that
receive price improvement and execute
against an order with midpoint pegging,
entered by a member that accesses
liquidity equal or exceeding 0.10% of
Consolidated Volume by reducing the
Consolidated Volume threshold to
0.09%.
BX also proposes to eliminate the
credit tier of $0.0012 per share
executed, which currently is provided
for orders that access liquidity,
excluding orders with midpoint pegging
and orders that receive price
improvement and execute against an
order with midpoint pegging, entered by
a member that accesses liquidity equal
to or exceeding 0.10% [sic] of total
Consolidated Volume during a month.
Next, the Exchange proposes to revise
the criteria for a member to qualify for
the credit tier of $0.0008 per share
executed, which will be provided for
orders that access liquidity, excluding
orders with midpoint pegging and
orders that receive price improvement
and execute against an order with
midpoint pegging, entered by a member
that accesses (rather than adds as is
3 A Midpoint Peg order has its priced based upon
the national best bid and offer, excluding the effect
that the Midpoint Peg Order itself has on the inside
bid or inside offer. Primary Pegged Orders with an
offset amount and Midpoint Pegged Orders will
never be displayed. A Midpoint Pegged Order may
be executed in sub-pennies if necessary to obtain
a midpoint price. A new timestamp is created for
the order each time it is automatically adjusted.
4 Consolidated Volume is defined as the total
consolidated volume reported to all consolidated
transaction reporting plans by all exchanges and
trade reporting facilities during a month in equity
securities, excluding executed orders with a size of
less than one round lot. For purposes of calculating
Consolidated Volume and the extent of a member’s
trading activity, expressed as a percentage of or
ratio to Consolidated Volume, the date of the
annual reconstitution of the Russell Investments
Indexes shall be excluded from both total
Consolidated Volume and the member’s trading
activity. See Rule 7018(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55889
currently stated) liquidity equal to or
exceeding 0.05% (rather than 0.02%
that is the current level), of total
Consolidated Volume during a month.
BX is also proposing to slightly
increase the charge for providing
liquidity through the NASDAQ OMX
BX Equities System (‘‘System’’) for a
displayed order entered by a member
that (i) adds liquidity equal to or
exceeding 0.25% of total Consolidated
Volume during a month; and (ii) adds
and accesses liquidity equal to or
exceeding 0.50% of total Consolidated
Volume during a month from $0.0014
per share executed to $0.0016 per share
executed.
Currently, a firm may become a
Qualified Market Maker (‘‘QMM’’) by
being a member that provides through
one or more of its BX System MPIDs
more than 0.15% of Consolidated
Volume during the month. For a
member qualifying under this method,
the member must have at least one
Qualified MPID, that is, an MPID
through which, for at least 200
securities, the QMM quotes at the
national best bid and offer (‘‘NBBO’’) an
average of at least 50% of the time
during regular market hours (9:30 a.m.
through 4:00 p.m.) during the month.
The Exchange is proposing to increase
the Consolidated Volume requirement
from 0.15% to 0.20% during the month
and to eliminate the additional
requirement that the member must also
provide an average daily volume of
1.5M shares or more of non-displayed
liquidity during the month.
Lastly, the Exchange is proposing to
amend a credit provided under the
Retail Price Improvement (‘‘RPI’’)
program in BX Rule 7018(e). The
Exchange’s RPI program provides
incentives to member firms (or a
division thereof) approved by the
Exchange to participate in the program
(a ‘‘Retail Member Organization’’) to
submit designated ‘‘Retail Orders’’ 5 for
the purpose of seeking price
improvement. The Exchange is
proposing to decrease the credit of
$0.0002 per share executed to $0.0000
per share executed that is provided for
a Retail Order that receives price
improvement (when the accepted price
of an order is different than the
5 A Retail Order is defined in BX Rule 4780(a)(2),
in part, as ‘‘an agency or riskless principal order
that satisfies the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03,
that originates from a natural person and is
submitted to the Exchange by a Retail Member
Organization, provided that no change is made to
the terms of the order with respect to price (except
in the case that a market order is changed to a
marketable limit order) or side of market and the
order does not originate from a trading algorithm or
any other computerized methodology.’’
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
55890
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
executed price of an order) and accesses
non-RPI order with midpoint pegging.
2. Statutory Basis
BX believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of section 6 of the Act,6 in general, and
with sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the
Act,7 in particular, in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons
using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls, and is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the new
and amended credit tiers for orders that
access liquidity (excluding orders with
midpoint pegging and excluding orders
that receive price improvement and
execute against an order with midpoint
pegging), as well as the modified criteria
for receiving certain of the credits based
on Consolidated Volume together, as
well as related clarifying changes, under
BX Rule 7018(a) are reasonable because
they provide additional opportunities
for market participants to receive credits
for participation on BX.
Specifically, the Exchange is
proposing a new of [sic] $0.0016 per
share executed credit tier, which
requires liquidity accessed of 0.15% or
more of Consolidated Volume during
the month. The Exchange is also
proposing a [sic] eliminate the $0.0012
per share executed credit tier, which
currently requires liquidity accessed of
0.05% or more of Consolidated Volume
during the month. Additionally, the
Exchange is modifying the existing
credit tier of $0.0008 per share executed
by increasing the minimum total
Consolidated Volume required from
0.02% to 0.05% and making it
applicable to members that access rather
than add liquidity. As such, the
Exchange is generally providing
increased credits for member firms that
remove increasing amounts of liquidity
from the Exchange. With respect to the
accesses Consolidated Volume
6 15
7 15
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Sep 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
requirement to receive the $0.0008
credit, the Exchange believes this is
reasonable because for firms to receive
the increased credit they must remove a
certain amount of Consolidated Volume,
which will improve market quality for
all participants.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed credits noted above are
equitably allocated and are not unfairly
discriminatory as they are provided to
all member firms that achieve the
minimum level of Consolidated Volume
required by the tier, with the member
firms that remove the greatest level of
Consolidated Volume receiving the
greatest credit. Additionally, the
Exchange believes that this proposed
rule change being changed from a
member that adds liquidity to being
applicable to a member that accesses
liquidity is reasonable because the
Exchange desires to further incentivize
member firms to participate in the
Exchange by removing liquidity.
The Exchange believes that
elimination of the $0.0012 per share
executed credit tier is reasonable
because the Exchange has added a
$0.0016 credit tier per share executed,
discussed above, and the Exchange
desires to further incentivize member
firms to participate in the Exchange by
removing liquidity, generally. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
addition of the $0.0016 credit tier per
share executed and elimination of the
$0.0012 per share executed credit tier,
are both an equitable allocation and are
not unfairly discriminatory because the
$0.0012 per share executed credit tier is
a no longer needed incentive for [sic]
market participant and member firms
will continue to have the opportunity to
qualify for a higher credit based on their
participation in BX by removing
liquidity.
Additionally, the Exchange believes
reducing the Consolidated Volume
threshold for the credit tier of $0.0015
per share executed, which is provided
for orders that access liquidity
(excluding orders with midpoint
pegging and orders that receive price
improvement and execute against an
order with midpoint pegging) and that
is entered by a member that accesses
liquidity, from equal or exceeding
0.10% of Consolidated Volume to
0.09%, is reasonable because it will
make it easier for members to receive a
rebate at that level and encourage
market participant activity and will also
support price discovery and liquidity
provision. The Exchange also believes
this proposed rule change is an
equitable allocation and is not unfairly
discriminatory because it will apply
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
uniformly to all member firms that so
qualify.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change to slightly increase the
charge assessed a member for entering a
displayed order is reasonable because
the exchange must balance the cost of
credits provided for orders removing
liquidity and the desire to provide
QMMs with incentives to provide
displayed orders. The Exchange notes
that the proposed charge continues to be
lower than the default charge assessed
for all other displayed orders that do not
otherwise qualify for a lower charge,
and as such continues to act as an
incentive to market participants to
provide such liquidity. The Exchange
believes that the proposed change is
both equitably allocated and is not
unfairly discriminatory because the
slightly increased charge applies
uniformly to all member firms that
previously had qualified to receive such
a credit.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed increase to the monthly
Consolidated Volume requirement from
0.15% to 0.20% for a firm to become a
QMM is reasonable because member
firms are being required to provide
through one or more of its BX System
MPIDs increased Consolidated Volume
to qualify, which will increase liquidity
in the market overall. Additionally, for
a member qualifying under this method,
the member must have at least one
Qualified MPID, that is, an MPID
through which, for at least 200
securities, the QMM quotes at the NBBO
an average of at least 50% of the time
during regular market hours (9:30 a.m.
through 4:00 p.m.) during the month.
BX also believes it is reasonable to
eliminate the additional requirement
that the member must also provide an
average daily volume of 1.5M shares or
more of non-displayed liquidity during
the month because the Exchange
believes removing this criteria will
allow QMMs to focus on making better
markets.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed increase to the monthly
Consolidated Volume requirement from
0.15% to 0.20% for a firm to become a
QMM is both equitably allocated and is
not unfairly discriminatory because it
[sic] the slightly higher Consolidated
Volume requirement applies uniformly
to firms seeking to qualify as a QMM.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed changes to the criteria for a
firm to qualify as a QMM expands the
opportunity for firms to qualify as a
QMM and further perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market by
making it easier to qualify for this
beneficial, market improving program
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
and bolster displayed liquidity by
eliminating the additional requirement
that the member must also provide an
average daily volume of 1.5M shares or
more of non-displayed liquidity during
the month.
BX believes that the proposed change
to decrease the credit of $0.0002 per
share executed to $0.0000 per share
executed that is provided for a Retail
Order that receives price improvement
(when the accepted price of an order is
different than the executed price of an
order) and accesses non-RPI order with
midpoint pegging is reasonable because
this incentive is no longer needed to
improve the market for retail order flow.
Also, the Exchange must continually
adjust its incentives to remain
competitive with other exchanges. The
Exchange also believes the reduced
credit is equitably allocated and is not
unfairly discriminatory because it
applies uniformly to all firms.
Finally, BX notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. In such an environment, BX
must continually adjust its fees to
remain competitive with other
exchanges and with alternative trading
systems that have been exempted from
compliance with the statutory standards
applicable to exchanges. The changes
reflect this environment because
although they reflect changes to both
credits and charges, with the price
increases being minor, while [sic] the
amended credits are designed overall to
incentivize changes in market
participant behavior to the benefit of the
market overall.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule changes will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.8
BX notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor dozens of
different competing exchanges and
alternative trading systems if they deem
fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, BX
must continually adjust its fees to
remain competitive with other
exchanges. Because competitors are free
to modify their own fees in response,
and because market participants may
readily adjust their order routing
practices, BX believes that the degree to
which fee changes in this market may
impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
In this instance, the modification to
the fee schedule, as well as
modifications to the criteria to become
a QMM, do not impose a burden on
competition because it is optional and is
the subject of competition from other
exchanges. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed change will
impair the ability of members or
competing order execution venues to
maintain their competitive standing in
the financial markets. Moreover,
because there are numerous competitive
alternatives to the use of the Exchange,
it is likely that BX will lose market
share as a result of the changes if they
are unattractive to market participants.
Accordingly, BX does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impair
the ability of members or competing
order execution venues to maintain
their competitive standing in the
financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing change has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 9 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 10 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
9 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Sep 16, 2015
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
10 17
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BX–2015–056 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2015–056. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BX–
2015–056, and should be submitted on
or before October 8, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–23289 Filed 9–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
11 17
Sfmt 9990
55891
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
17SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 180 (Thursday, September 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55888-55891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23289]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-75904; File No. SR-BX-2015-056]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Exchange Rule 7018
September 11, 2015.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 1, 2015, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed
[[Page 55889]]
rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the fee schedule under Exchange Rule
7018(a) with respect to execution and routing of orders in securities
priced at $1 or more per share and to amend a credit under BX Rule
7018(e).
While the changes proposed herein are effective upon filing, the
Exchange has designated that the amendments be operative on September
1, 2015.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's Web site at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend the fee schedule under BX Rule
7018(a), relating to charges and credits provided for orders in
securities priced and $1 or more per share that execute on BX, as well
as to reduce a credit provided in connection with the Retail Price
Improvement (``RPI'') program under BX Rule 7018(e).
Under BX Rule 7018(a), the Exchange provides credits to member
firms that access certain levels of liquidity on BX per month. The
Exchange is proposing to amend several of the credit tiers for orders
that access liquidity (excluding orders with midpoint pegging and
excluding orders that receive price improvement and execute against an
order with midpoint pegging), as well as modify the criteria for
receiving certain of the credits. The Exchange also proposes a few
minor changes made for the purposes of clarity and conformity.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to add a new credit tier of
$0.0016 per share executed, which will be provided for orders that
access liquidity, excluding orders with midpoint pegging \3\ and orders
that receive price improvement and execute against an order with
midpoint pegging, entered by a member that accesses liquidity equal to
or exceeding 0.15% of total consolidated volume \4\ (``Consolidated
Volume'') during a month. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to amend
the credit tier of $0.0015 per share executed, which is provided for
orders that access liquidity, excluding orders with midpoint pegging
and orders that receive price improvement and execute against an order
with midpoint pegging, entered by a member that accesses liquidity
equal or exceeding 0.10% of Consolidated Volume by reducing the
Consolidated Volume threshold to 0.09%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A Midpoint Peg order has its priced based upon the national
best bid and offer, excluding the effect that the Midpoint Peg Order
itself has on the inside bid or inside offer. Primary Pegged Orders
with an offset amount and Midpoint Pegged Orders will never be
displayed. A Midpoint Pegged Order may be executed in sub-pennies if
necessary to obtain a midpoint price. A new timestamp is created for
the order each time it is automatically adjusted.
\4\ Consolidated Volume is defined as the total consolidated
volume reported to all consolidated transaction reporting plans by
all exchanges and trade reporting facilities during a month in
equity securities, excluding executed orders with a size of less
than one round lot. For purposes of calculating Consolidated Volume
and the extent of a member's trading activity, expressed as a
percentage of or ratio to Consolidated Volume, the date of the
annual reconstitution of the Russell Investments Indexes shall be
excluded from both total Consolidated Volume and the member's
trading activity. See Rule 7018(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX also proposes to eliminate the credit tier of $0.0012 per share
executed, which currently is provided for orders that access liquidity,
excluding orders with midpoint pegging and orders that receive price
improvement and execute against an order with midpoint pegging, entered
by a member that accesses liquidity equal to or exceeding 0.10% [sic]
of total Consolidated Volume during a month.
Next, the Exchange proposes to revise the criteria for a member to
qualify for the credit tier of $0.0008 per share executed, which will
be provided for orders that access liquidity, excluding orders with
midpoint pegging and orders that receive price improvement and execute
against an order with midpoint pegging, entered by a member that
accesses (rather than adds as is currently stated) liquidity equal to
or exceeding 0.05% (rather than 0.02% that is the current level), of
total Consolidated Volume during a month.
BX is also proposing to slightly increase the charge for providing
liquidity through the NASDAQ OMX BX Equities System (``System'') for a
displayed order entered by a member that (i) adds liquidity equal to or
exceeding 0.25% of total Consolidated Volume during a month; and (ii)
adds and accesses liquidity equal to or exceeding 0.50% of total
Consolidated Volume during a month from $0.0014 per share executed to
$0.0016 per share executed.
Currently, a firm may become a Qualified Market Maker (``QMM'') by
being a member that provides through one or more of its BX System MPIDs
more than 0.15% of Consolidated Volume during the month. For a member
qualifying under this method, the member must have at least one
Qualified MPID, that is, an MPID through which, for at least 200
securities, the QMM quotes at the national best bid and offer
(``NBBO'') an average of at least 50% of the time during regular market
hours (9:30 a.m. through 4:00 p.m.) during the month. The Exchange is
proposing to increase the Consolidated Volume requirement from 0.15% to
0.20% during the month and to eliminate the additional requirement that
the member must also provide an average daily volume of 1.5M shares or
more of non-displayed liquidity during the month.
Lastly, the Exchange is proposing to amend a credit provided under
the Retail Price Improvement (``RPI'') program in BX Rule 7018(e). The
Exchange's RPI program provides incentives to member firms (or a
division thereof) approved by the Exchange to participate in the
program (a ``Retail Member Organization'') to submit designated
``Retail Orders'' \5\ for the purpose of seeking price improvement. The
Exchange is proposing to decrease the credit of $0.0002 per share
executed to $0.0000 per share executed that is provided for a Retail
Order that receives price improvement (when the accepted price of an
order is different than the
[[Page 55890]]
executed price of an order) and accesses non-RPI order with midpoint
pegging.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ A Retail Order is defined in BX Rule 4780(a)(2), in part, as
``an agency or riskless principal order that satisfies the criteria
of FINRA Rule 5320.03, that originates from a natural person and is
submitted to the Exchange by a Retail Member Organization, provided
that no change is made to the terms of the order with respect to
price (except in the case that a market order is changed to a
marketable limit order) or side of market and the order does not
originate from a trading algorithm or any other computerized
methodology.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
BX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of section 6 of the Act,\6\ in general, and with sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or
system which the Exchange operates or controls, and is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest; and is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the new and amended credit tiers for
orders that access liquidity (excluding orders with midpoint pegging
and excluding orders that receive price improvement and execute against
an order with midpoint pegging), as well as the modified criteria for
receiving certain of the credits based on Consolidated Volume together,
as well as related clarifying changes, under BX Rule 7018(a) are
reasonable because they provide additional opportunities for market
participants to receive credits for participation on BX.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing a new of [sic] $0.0016 per
share executed credit tier, which requires liquidity accessed of 0.15%
or more of Consolidated Volume during the month. The Exchange is also
proposing a [sic] eliminate the $0.0012 per share executed credit tier,
which currently requires liquidity accessed of 0.05% or more of
Consolidated Volume during the month. Additionally, the Exchange is
modifying the existing credit tier of $0.0008 per share executed by
increasing the minimum total Consolidated Volume required from 0.02% to
0.05% and making it applicable to members that access rather than add
liquidity. As such, the Exchange is generally providing increased
credits for member firms that remove increasing amounts of liquidity
from the Exchange. With respect to the accesses Consolidated Volume
requirement to receive the $0.0008 credit, the Exchange believes this
is reasonable because for firms to receive the increased credit they
must remove a certain amount of Consolidated Volume, which will improve
market quality for all participants.
The Exchange believes that the proposed credits noted above are
equitably allocated and are not unfairly discriminatory as they are
provided to all member firms that achieve the minimum level of
Consolidated Volume required by the tier, with the member firms that
remove the greatest level of Consolidated Volume receiving the greatest
credit. Additionally, the Exchange believes that this proposed rule
change being changed from a member that adds liquidity to being
applicable to a member that accesses liquidity is reasonable because
the Exchange desires to further incentivize member firms to participate
in the Exchange by removing liquidity.
The Exchange believes that elimination of the $0.0012 per share
executed credit tier is reasonable because the Exchange has added a
$0.0016 credit tier per share executed, discussed above, and the
Exchange desires to further incentivize member firms to participate in
the Exchange by removing liquidity, generally. The Exchange believes
that the proposed addition of the $0.0016 credit tier per share
executed and elimination of the $0.0012 per share executed credit tier,
are both an equitable allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory
because the $0.0012 per share executed credit tier is a no longer
needed incentive for [sic] market participant and member firms will
continue to have the opportunity to qualify for a higher credit based
on their participation in BX by removing liquidity.
Additionally, the Exchange believes reducing the Consolidated
Volume threshold for the credit tier of $0.0015 per share executed,
which is provided for orders that access liquidity (excluding orders
with midpoint pegging and orders that receive price improvement and
execute against an order with midpoint pegging) and that is entered by
a member that accesses liquidity, from equal or exceeding 0.10% of
Consolidated Volume to 0.09%, is reasonable because it will make it
easier for members to receive a rebate at that level and encourage
market participant activity and will also support price discovery and
liquidity provision. The Exchange also believes this proposed rule
change is an equitable allocation and is not unfairly discriminatory
because it will apply uniformly to all member firms that so qualify.
The Exchange believes that the proposed change to slightly increase
the charge assessed a member for entering a displayed order is
reasonable because the exchange must balance the cost of credits
provided for orders removing liquidity and the desire to provide QMMs
with incentives to provide displayed orders. The Exchange notes that
the proposed charge continues to be lower than the default charge
assessed for all other displayed orders that do not otherwise qualify
for a lower charge, and as such continues to act as an incentive to
market participants to provide such liquidity. The Exchange believes
that the proposed change is both equitably allocated and is not
unfairly discriminatory because the slightly increased charge applies
uniformly to all member firms that previously had qualified to receive
such a credit.
The Exchange believes that the proposed increase to the monthly
Consolidated Volume requirement from 0.15% to 0.20% for a firm to
become a QMM is reasonable because member firms are being required to
provide through one or more of its BX System MPIDs increased
Consolidated Volume to qualify, which will increase liquidity in the
market overall. Additionally, for a member qualifying under this
method, the member must have at least one Qualified MPID, that is, an
MPID through which, for at least 200 securities, the QMM quotes at the
NBBO an average of at least 50% of the time during regular market hours
(9:30 a.m. through 4:00 p.m.) during the month. BX also believes it is
reasonable to eliminate the additional requirement that the member must
also provide an average daily volume of 1.5M shares or more of non-
displayed liquidity during the month because the Exchange believes
removing this criteria will allow QMMs to focus on making better
markets.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed increase to the
monthly Consolidated Volume requirement from 0.15% to 0.20% for a firm
to become a QMM is both equitably allocated and is not unfairly
discriminatory because it [sic] the slightly higher Consolidated Volume
requirement applies uniformly to firms seeking to qualify as a QMM. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed changes to the criteria for a
firm to qualify as a QMM expands the opportunity for firms to qualify
as a QMM and further perfects the mechanism of a free and open market
by making it easier to qualify for this beneficial, market improving
program
[[Page 55891]]
and bolster displayed liquidity by eliminating the additional
requirement that the member must also provide an average daily volume
of 1.5M shares or more of non-displayed liquidity during the month.
BX believes that the proposed change to decrease the credit of
$0.0002 per share executed to $0.0000 per share executed that is
provided for a Retail Order that receives price improvement (when the
accepted price of an order is different than the executed price of an
order) and accesses non-RPI order with midpoint pegging is reasonable
because this incentive is no longer needed to improve the market for
retail order flow. Also, the Exchange must continually adjust its
incentives to remain competitive with other exchanges. The Exchange
also believes the reduced credit is equitably allocated and is not
unfairly discriminatory because it applies uniformly to all firms.
Finally, BX notes that it operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. In such an
environment, BX must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive
with other exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have
been exempted from compliance with the statutory standards applicable
to exchanges. The changes reflect this environment because although
they reflect changes to both credits and charges, with the price
increases being minor, while [sic] the amended credits are designed
overall to incentivize changes in market participant behavior to the
benefit of the market overall.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.\8\
BX notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor dozens of different competing
exchanges and alternative trading systems if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, BX must
continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges.
Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and
because market participants may readily adjust their order routing
practices, BX believes that the degree to which fee changes in this
market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this instance, the modification to the fee schedule, as well as
modifications to the criteria to become a QMM, do not impose a burden
on competition because it is optional and is the subject of competition
from other exchanges. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed
change will impair the ability of members or competing order execution
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
Moreover, because there are numerous competitive alternatives to the
use of the Exchange, it is likely that BX will lose market share as a
result of the changes if they are unattractive to market participants.
Accordingly, BX does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impair the ability of members or competing order execution venues to
maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \10\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2015-056 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2015-056. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2015-056,
and should be submitted on or before October 8, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-23289 Filed 9-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P