Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Amend NASDAQ Rules 7015(b) and (g) to Modify Port Fees, 55698-55700 [2015-23212]
Download as PDF
55698
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Notices
potential to impair revenues from both
products. ‘‘No one disputes that
competition for order flow is ‘fierce’.’’
NetCoalition I at 539. The existence of
fierce competition for order flow
implies a high degree of price sensitivity
on the part of BDs with order flow, since
they may readily reduce costs by
directing orders toward the lowest-cost
trading venues. A BD that shifted its
order flow from one platform to another
in response to order execution price
differentials would both reduce the
value of that platform’s market data and
reduce its own need to consume data
from the disfavored platform. If a
platform increases its market data fees,
the change will affect the overall cost of
doing business with the platform, and
affected BDs will assess whether they
can lower their trading costs by
directing orders elsewhere and thereby
lessening the need for the more
expensive data. Similarly, increases in
the cost of NLS Plus would impair the
willingness of distributors to take a
product for which there are numerous
alternatives, impacting NLS Plus data
revenues, the value of NLS Plus as a tool
for attracting order flow, and ultimately,
the volume of orders routed and the
value of other data products.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.33 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
[Release No. 34–75882; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2015–110]
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2015–76 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change to Amend
NASDAQ Rules 7015(b) and (g) to
Modify Port Fees
September 10, 2015.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2015–76. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2015–76 and should
be submitted on or before October 7,
2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.34
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–23219 Filed 9–15–15; 8:45 am]
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on
September 3, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock
Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to reduce the
fee charged for FIX Trading Ports under
Rule 7015(b) and certain other ports
under Rule 7015(g) in light of the
Exchange removing recently-upgraded
hardware supporting the ports, which
was the basis for an increased fee. The
Exchange will implement the proposed
new fees on September 1, 2015.
The text of the proposed rule change
is below; proposed new language is
underlined; proposed deletions are in
brackets.
*
*
*
*
*
7015. Access Services
The following charges are assessed by
Nasdaq for connectivity to systems
operated by NASDAQ, including the
Nasdaq Market Center, the FINRA/
NASDAQ Trade Reporting Facility, and
FINRA’s OTCBB Service. The following
fees are not applicable to the NASDAQ
Options Market LLC. For related options
fees for Access Services refer to Chapter
XV, Section 3 of the Options Rules.
(a) No change.
(b) Financial Information Exchange
(FIX)
Ports
FIX Trading Port ...............
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
33 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 15, 2015
34 17
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 17
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
16SEN1
Price
$550[75]/port/
month.
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Notices
Ports
FIX Port for Services
Other than Trading.
Price
$500/port/month.
55699
(c)—(f) No change.
(g) Other Port Fees
REMOTE MULTI-CAST ITCH WAVE PORTS
Description
Installation fee
MITCH Wave Port at Secaucus, NJ ........................................................................................................................
MITCH Wave Port at Weehawken, NJ ....................................................................................................................
MITCH Wave Port at Mahwah, NJ ..........................................................................................................................
The following port fees shall apply in
connection with the use of other trading
telecommunication protocols:
• $550[75] per month for each port
pair, other than Multicast ITCH® data
feed pairs, for which the fee is $1,000
per month for software-based
TotalView-ITCH or $2,500 per month
for combined software- and hardwarebased TotalView-ITCH, and TCP ITCH
data feed pairs, for which the fee is $750
per month.
• An additional $200 per month for
each port used for entering orders or
quotes over the Internet.
• An additional $600 per month for
each port used for market data delivery
over the Internet.
Dedicated OUCH Port Infrastructure
The Dedicated OUCH Port
Infrastructure subscription allows a
member firm to assign up to 30 of its
OUCH ports to a dedicated server
infrastructure for its exclusive use. A
Dedicated OUCH Port Infrastructure
subscription is available to a member
firm for a fee of $5,000 per month,
which is in addition to the standard fees
assessed for each OUCH port. A onetime installation fee of $5,000 is
assessed subscribers for each Dedicated
OUCH Port Server subscription.
(h)—(i) No change.
*
*
*
*
*
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
NASDAQ is proposing to amend
NASDAQ Rules 7015(b) and (g) to
modify the monthly fee it charges for
ports used to enter orders in the
NASDAQ Market Center for the trading
of equities, in connection with the use
of FIX and other trading
telecommunication protocols.3
NASDAQ recently increased fees for FIX
Ports under Rule 7015(b) and for ports
with certain other protocols under Rule
7015(g).4 NASDAQ increased the fees to
offset costs associated with upgrading
these ports with new fieldprogrammable gate array (‘‘FPGA’’)
technology, which is a hardwaredelivery mechanism that provides
improved performance in terms of
predictability.5 The Exchange
implemented the new FPGA hardware
and increased the related port fees on
August 3, 2015.
NASDAQ recently completed internal
testing of future functionality related to
the trading systems and through this
testing identified a potential unforeseen
risk, which could cause a disruption to
trading with the FPGA updated ports.
3 Under Rule 7015(g), the Exchange assesses
certain port fees that apply in connection with the
use of other trading telecommunication protocols.
NASDAQ charges a $575 per month, per port pair
fee for OUCH and RASH protocol ports, $1,000 per
month, per port pair for software-based TotalViewITCH, $2,500 per month, per port pair for combined
software- and hardware-based TotalView-ITCH, and
$750 per month, per port pair for TCP ITCH data
feed pairs. Under the rule, the Exchange also
assesses an additional $200 per month for each port
used for entering orders or quotes over the Internet
and an additional $600 per month for each port
used for market data delivery over the Internet.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75557
(July 30, 2015), 80 FR 46640 (August 5, 2015) (SR–
NASDAQ–2015–086).
5 FPGA hardware is able to process more data
packets during peak market conditions without the
introduction of variable queuing latency, which
improves the predictability of telecommunications
ports over non-FPGA hardware and thereby adds
value to the user.
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$2,500
2,500
5,000
Recurring
monthly fee
$7,500
7,500
12,500
As a consequence, the Exchange has
determined that the risk associated with
keeping the FPGA technology in terms
of potential disruption to trading
outweighs the benefit provided in terms
of increased performance. Additionally,
NASDAQ would like to conduct
additional testing and further review of
the implementation before
reintroducing the offering. Accordingly,
the Exchange is reverting the affected
ports back to the hardware used prior to
the FPGA hardware as a precautionary
measure and concurrently reducing the
monthly fees for those ports to their preupgrade levels.
2. Statutory Basis
NASDAQ believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,6 in
general, and with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 7 in particular, in that the proposal
is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that removing the FPGA hardware and
reverting back to the hardware used
prior to the FPGA upgrade will further
perfect the NASDAQ market and serve
to protect investors because the change
is designed to minimize a newlyidentified risk of a market disruption
caused by a technical issue within the
Exchange’s control to eliminate. The
Exchange determined that the risk,
while unlikely to occur, would be
disruptive to trading and consequently
outweighs the benefit it provided.
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6 15
7 15
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16SEN1
55700
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Notices
6(b)(4) of the Act 8 in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons
using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls, and it
does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed reduction in port fees under
Rules 7015(b) and (g) to their pre-FPGA
upgrade levels is reasonable because
NASDAQ is removing the upgraded
hardware from the ports, the cost of
which was the basis for increasing the
fees. In addition, applying the lower
fees will allow NASDAQ to keep the fee
in line with its realized capital and
operating expenditures, which will be
lower going forward based on the
operation of the ports with the preupgrade hardware. The Exchange
believes that the proposed reduction of
the fees to their prior levels is both
equitably allocated and not unfairly
discriminatory because it will apply
uniformly to all market participants that
subscribe to FIX Ports under Rule
7015(b), and OUCH and RASH Ports
under Rule 7015(g) based on the number
of such ports subscribed. Accordingly,
market participants will be assessed the
fees in place prior to the increase and
will have the same hardware supported
by those fees.
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
NASDAQ does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
The Exchange believes that the proposal
is irrelevant to competition because it is
not driven by, and will have no impact
on, competition. Specifically, the
Exchange is reverting fees to their prior,
lower levels in light of the Exchange
removing upgraded hardware that was
the basis for the fee increase. Reverting
the fees to their lower levels will keep
the fees assessed in line with the
Exchange’s expenditures at this juncture
associated with offering the ports. As
such, the Exchange does not believe the
proposed change will have any impact
on competition, as market participants
will be assessed the same fee for their
ports with the same hardware that was
in place prior to the fee increase.
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 15, 2015
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.9
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2015–110 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2015–110. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
9 15
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2015–110 and should be
submitted on or before October 7, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–23212 Filed 9–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 75885]
In the Matter of BATS Global Markets,
Inc.; BOX Options Exchange LLC; KCG
Holdings, Inc.; Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC;
Susquehanna International Group,
LLP; Order Granting Petitions for
Review and Scheduling Filing of
Statements
September 10, 2015.
This matter comes before the
Commission on petition to review the
approval, through delegated authority,
of the Options Clearing Corporation’s
(‘‘OCC’’) plan for raising additional
capital (‘‘Capital Plan’’) to support its
function as a systemically important
financial market utility. On January 26,
2015, the Commission issued a notice of
filing of the proposed rule change
regarding the Capital Plan.1 After
consideration of the record in the
proposed rule change, the Division of
Trading and Markets, for the
Commission pursuant to delegated
authority, issued an order approving
10 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Exchange Act Release No. 74136
(January 26, 2015), 80 FR 5171 (January 30, 2015)
(SR–OCC–2015–02).
1 Securities
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 179 (Wednesday, September 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55698-55700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23212]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-75882; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2015-110]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to
Amend NASDAQ Rules 7015(b) and (g) to Modify Port Fees
September 10, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on September 3, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to reduce the fee charged for FIX Trading
Ports under Rule 7015(b) and certain other ports under Rule 7015(g) in
light of the Exchange removing recently-upgraded hardware supporting
the ports, which was the basis for an increased fee. The Exchange will
implement the proposed new fees on September 1, 2015.
The text of the proposed rule change is below; proposed new
language is underlined; proposed deletions are in brackets.
* * * * *
7015. Access Services
The following charges are assessed by Nasdaq for connectivity to
systems operated by NASDAQ, including the Nasdaq Market Center, the
FINRA/NASDAQ Trade Reporting Facility, and FINRA's OTCBB Service. The
following fees are not applicable to the NASDAQ Options Market LLC. For
related options fees for Access Services refer to Chapter XV, Section 3
of the Options Rules.
(a) No change.
(b) Financial Information Exchange (FIX)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ports Price
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIX Trading Port.......................... $550[75]/port/month.
[[Page 55699]]
FIX Port for Services Other than Trading.. $500/port/month.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c)--(f) No change.
(g) Other Port Fees
Remote Multi-Cast ITCH Wave Ports
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation Recurring
Description fee monthly fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MITCH Wave Port at Secaucus, NJ......... $2,500 $7,500
MITCH Wave Port at Weehawken, NJ........ 2,500 7,500
MITCH Wave Port at Mahwah, NJ........... 5,000 12,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following port fees shall apply in connection with the use of
other trading telecommunication protocols:
$550[75] per month for each port pair, other than
Multicast ITCH[supreg] data feed pairs, for which the fee is $1,000 per
month for software-based TotalView-ITCH or $2,500 per month for
combined software- and hardware-based TotalView-ITCH, and TCP ITCH data
feed pairs, for which the fee is $750 per month.
An additional $200 per month for each port used for
entering orders or quotes over the Internet.
An additional $600 per month for each port used for market
data delivery over the Internet.
Dedicated OUCH Port Infrastructure
The Dedicated OUCH Port Infrastructure subscription allows a member
firm to assign up to 30 of its OUCH ports to a dedicated server
infrastructure for its exclusive use. A Dedicated OUCH Port
Infrastructure subscription is available to a member firm for a fee of
$5,000 per month, which is in addition to the standard fees assessed
for each OUCH port. A one-time installation fee of $5,000 is assessed
subscribers for each Dedicated OUCH Port Server subscription.
(h)--(i) No change.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
NASDAQ is proposing to amend NASDAQ Rules 7015(b) and (g) to modify
the monthly fee it charges for ports used to enter orders in the NASDAQ
Market Center for the trading of equities, in connection with the use
of FIX and other trading telecommunication protocols.\3\ NASDAQ
recently increased fees for FIX Ports under Rule 7015(b) and for ports
with certain other protocols under Rule 7015(g).\4\ NASDAQ increased
the fees to offset costs associated with upgrading these ports with new
field-programmable gate array (``FPGA'') technology, which is a
hardware-delivery mechanism that provides improved performance in terms
of predictability.\5\ The Exchange implemented the new FPGA hardware
and increased the related port fees on August 3, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Under Rule 7015(g), the Exchange assesses certain port fees
that apply in connection with the use of other trading
telecommunication protocols. NASDAQ charges a $575 per month, per
port pair fee for OUCH and RASH protocol ports, $1,000 per month,
per port pair for software-based TotalView-ITCH, $2,500 per month,
per port pair for combined software- and hardware-based TotalView-
ITCH, and $750 per month, per port pair for TCP ITCH data feed
pairs. Under the rule, the Exchange also assesses an additional $200
per month for each port used for entering orders or quotes over the
Internet and an additional $600 per month for each port used for
market data delivery over the Internet.
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75557 (July 30,
2015), 80 FR 46640 (August 5, 2015) (SR-NASDAQ-2015-086).
\5\ FPGA hardware is able to process more data packets during
peak market conditions without the introduction of variable queuing
latency, which improves the predictability of telecommunications
ports over non-FPGA hardware and thereby adds value to the user.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASDAQ recently completed internal testing of future functionality
related to the trading systems and through this testing identified a
potential unforeseen risk, which could cause a disruption to trading
with the FPGA updated ports. As a consequence, the Exchange has
determined that the risk associated with keeping the FPGA technology in
terms of potential disruption to trading outweighs the benefit provided
in terms of increased performance. Additionally, NASDAQ would like to
conduct additional testing and further review of the implementation
before reintroducing the offering. Accordingly, the Exchange is
reverting the affected ports back to the hardware used prior to the
FPGA hardware as a precautionary measure and concurrently reducing the
monthly fees for those ports to their pre-upgrade levels.
2. Statutory Basis
NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\6\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that the proposal is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that
removing the FPGA hardware and reverting back to the hardware used
prior to the FPGA upgrade will further perfect the NASDAQ market and
serve to protect investors because the change is designed to minimize a
newly-identified risk of a market disruption caused by a technical
issue within the Exchange's control to eliminate. The Exchange
determined that the risk, while unlikely to occur, would be disruptive
to trading and consequently outweighs the benefit it provided.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section
[[Page 55700]]
6(b)(4) of the Act \8\ in that it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers
and other persons using any facility or system which the Exchange
operates or controls, and it does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Exchange believes that the
proposed reduction in port fees under Rules 7015(b) and (g) to their
pre-FPGA upgrade levels is reasonable because NASDAQ is removing the
upgraded hardware from the ports, the cost of which was the basis for
increasing the fees. In addition, applying the lower fees will allow
NASDAQ to keep the fee in line with its realized capital and operating
expenditures, which will be lower going forward based on the operation
of the ports with the pre-upgrade hardware. The Exchange believes that
the proposed reduction of the fees to their prior levels is both
equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because it will
apply uniformly to all market participants that subscribe to FIX Ports
under Rule 7015(b), and OUCH and RASH Ports under Rule 7015(g) based on
the number of such ports subscribed. Accordingly, market participants
will be assessed the fees in place prior to the increase and will have
the same hardware supported by those fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NASDAQ does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The Exchange
believes that the proposal is irrelevant to competition because it is
not driven by, and will have no impact on, competition. Specifically,
the Exchange is reverting fees to their prior, lower levels in light of
the Exchange removing upgraded hardware that was the basis for the fee
increase. Reverting the fees to their lower levels will keep the fees
assessed in line with the Exchange's expenditures at this juncture
associated with offering the ports. As such, the Exchange does not
believe the proposed change will have any impact on competition, as
market participants will be assessed the same fee for their ports with
the same hardware that was in place prior to the fee increase.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-110 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-110. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-110 and should
be submitted on or before October 7, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-23212 Filed 9-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P