Low-Enriched Uranium From France: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 55089-55090 [2015-23050]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Notices
developing the report to Congress. All
comments received in response to this
notice will be displayed on BIS’s
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web
site at https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/ and on
the Federal e-Rulemaking portal at
www.Regulations.gov. All comments
will also be included in a report to
Congress, as required by section 6 of the
EAA, which directs that BIS report to
Congress the results of its consultations
with industry on the effects of foreign
policy-based controls.
Dated: September 8, 2015.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–22982 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Period of Review
The period of review (POR) is
February 1, 2013, through January 31,
2014.
International Trade Administration
[A–427–818]
Low-Enriched Uranium From France:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 9, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on lowenriched uranium (LEU) from France.1
The review covers one producer or
exporter of the subject merchandise,
Eurodif S.A., AREVA NC, and AREVA
NC, Inc. (collectively AREVA). The
Department determines that AREVA
made no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR. The
Department also determines that we will
issue revised certifications required
from the importer and end-user.
DATES: Effective Date: September 14,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
For a complete description of the
events that followed the Preliminary
1 See
Low Enriched Uranium from France;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 12434
(March 9, 2015) (Preliminary Results).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is available electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Services System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
acess.trade.gov, and it is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit of
the main Commerce Building, room
B8024. In addition, a complete version
of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is also accessible on the
internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
all low-enriched uranium. Lowenriched uranium is enriched uranium
hexafluoride (UF6) with a U235 product
assay of less than 20 percent that has
not been converted into another
chemical form, such as UO2, or
fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies,
regardless of the means by which the
LEU is produced (including lowenriched uranium produced through the
down-blending of highly enriched
uranium).3
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the parties in the
case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
A list of the issues addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is
appended to this notice.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
In the Preliminary Results the
Department determined that AREVA did
have shipments of merchandise subject
to the antidumping order on LEU from
France during the POR. Upon review of
the comments received from parties, the
Department finds that AREVA had no
2 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Low-Enriched Uranium From France:
2013–2014’’ from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance (Issues and Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with these results and herby
adopted by this notice.
3 For a full description of the scope of the order,
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55089
shipments subject to the antidumping
duty order. We have also determined to
allow revised the re-export certifications
required under the scope of the order to
allow replenishment of LEU that has
been re-exported and to address the
issue of samples in future entries.4
Determination of No Shipments
We determine that AREVA had no
shipments of merchandise subject to the
antidumping duty order on LEU from
France during the POR.
Determination of Revised Certifications
The Department will issue customs
instructions with revised certifications
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP). These instructions will be posted
on CBP’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Online Search
System, available at https://
adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/, and the
Department will release the customs
instructions with revised certifications
via ACCESS. The revised certifications
are effective when posted on the CBP’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Online Search System.
Assessment Rates
Since the Department found that
AREVA had no shipments subject to the
order during the POR, we did not
calculate importer-specific assessment
rates for these final results.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by companies
included in the final results of review
for which these companies did not
know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate un-reviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.5
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective for all shipments of
LEU from France entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for
AREVA will remain unchanged from the
4 See Issue 2: Re-export Certifications section of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
55090
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 2015 / Notices
rate assigned to the company in the
most recently completed review of that
company, except for entries for which
the importer claims to be excluded from
the order under the re-export provision
of the scope, which will require a cash
deposit rate of zero percent; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period with a completed
segment of this proceeding; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period with a completed segment
of this proceeding for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 19.95
percent, the all-others rate established
in the investigation.6 Entries
accompanied by certifications from the
exporter, the importer, and the end user,
indicating that the LEU will be reexported within 18 months will be
subject to a cash deposit requirement of
zero percent ad valorem. These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice is the only reminder to
parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to the importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
6 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Low Enriched Uranium From France,
67 FR 6680 (February 13, 2002).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Sep 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results of administrative
review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 4, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
Issues in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Treatment of Samples
Comment 2: Re-export Certifications
V. Determination of No Shipments
VI. Revised Entry Certifications
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–23050 Filed 9–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into
Modules, From the People’s Republic
of China: Rescission of Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published its
Preliminary Rescission for the new
shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the
antidumping duty order on crystalline
silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or
not assembled into modules, from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on
April 21, 2015.1 The period of review
(‘‘POR’’) is December 1, 2013, through
May 31, 2014. As discussed below, we
AGENCY:
1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission
of 2013–2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review, 80 FR 22164 (April 21, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary
Rescission’’); see also Memorandum to Howard
Smith, Acting Director, Office 4, AD/CVD
Operations, from Jeffrey Pedersen, International
Trade Analyst, titled ‘‘2013–2014 Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review of Crystalline Silicon
Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into
Modules, From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Hengdian
Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.,’’ dated April 7,
2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
preliminarily found that the sale made
by Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics
Co., Ltd. (‘‘DMEGC’’) was non-bona fide,
and announced our preliminary intent
to rescind its NSR. For the final results
of this review, we continue to find
DMEGC’s sale to be non-bona fide.
Therefore, we are rescinding this NSR.
DATES: Effective Date: September 14,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
For a complete description of the
events that following the publication of
the Preliminary Results, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s AD
and Countervailing Duty (CVD)
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,
and modules, laminates, and panels,
consisting of crystalline silicon
photovoltaic cells, whether or not
partially or fully assembled into other
products, including, but not limited to,
modules, laminates, panels and building
integrated materials.3 Merchandise
covered by the order is classifiable
under subheadings 8501.61.0000,
8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030,
2 See Memorandum from Edward Yang, Senior
Director, Office VII, Antidumping and
Countervailing Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review:
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or
Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s
Republic of China’’ issued concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’).
3 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 177 (Monday, September 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55089-55090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23050]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-427-818]
Low-Enriched Uranium From France: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 9, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on low-enriched uranium (LEU) from France.\1\
The review covers one producer or exporter of the subject merchandise,
Eurodif S.A., AREVA NC, and AREVA NC, Inc. (collectively AREVA). The
Department determines that AREVA made no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR. The Department also determines that we will
issue revised certifications required from the importer and end-user.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Low Enriched Uranium from France; Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 12434
(March 9, 2015) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: September 14, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
For a complete description of the events that followed the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is available
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://acess.trade.gov, and
it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit of the main
Commerce Building, room B8024. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is also accessible on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Low-Enriched Uranium From
France: 2013-2014'' from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (Issues
and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with these results and
herby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Review
The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2013, through January 31,
2014.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is all low-enriched uranium. Low-
enriched uranium is enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6) with
a U\235\ product assay of less than 20 percent that has not been
converted into another chemical form, such as UO2, or
fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, regardless of the means by
which the LEU is produced (including low-enriched uranium produced
through the down-blending of highly enriched uranium).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the parties in the case and rebuttal briefs
are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the
issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to
this notice.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
In the Preliminary Results the Department determined that AREVA did
have shipments of merchandise subject to the antidumping order on LEU
from France during the POR. Upon review of the comments received from
parties, the Department finds that AREVA had no shipments subject to
the antidumping duty order. We have also determined to allow revised
the re-export certifications required under the scope of the order to
allow replenishment of LEU that has been re-exported and to address the
issue of samples in future entries.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Issue 2: Re-export Certifications section of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of No Shipments
We determine that AREVA had no shipments of merchandise subject to
the antidumping duty order on LEU from France during the POR.
Determination of Revised Certifications
The Department will issue customs instructions with revised
certifications to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). These
instructions will be posted on CBP's Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Online Search System, available at https://adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/, and the Department will release the customs instructions
with revised certifications via ACCESS. The revised certifications are
effective when posted on the CBP's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Online Search System.
Assessment Rates
Since the Department found that AREVA had no shipments subject to
the order during the POR, we did not calculate importer-specific
assessment rates for these final results.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in the final
results of review for which these companies did not know that the
merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of LEU from France entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for AREVA will remain unchanged from
the
[[Page 55090]]
rate assigned to the company in the most recently completed review of
that company, except for entries for which the importer claims to be
excluded from the order under the re-export provision of the scope,
which will require a cash deposit rate of zero percent; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period with a completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the most recent period with a completed segment of this proceeding for
the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for
all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 19.95 percent,
the all-others rate established in the investigation.\6\ Entries
accompanied by certifications from the exporter, the importer, and the
end user, indicating that the LEU will be re-exported within 18 months
will be subject to a cash deposit requirement of zero percent ad
valorem. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Low Enriched Uranium
From France, 67 FR 6680 (February 13, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to the importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results of administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: September 4, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Issues in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Treatment of Samples
Comment 2: Re-export Certifications
V. Determination of No Shipments
VI. Revised Entry Certifications
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-23050 Filed 9-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P