Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Establish a New Auction, BX PRISM, 54601-54614 [2015-22742]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
Officers’ Club, 50 Moraga Avenue,
Presidio of San Francisco, California.
The Presidio Trust was created by
Congress in 1996 to manage
approximately eighty percent of the
former U.S. Army base known as the
Presidio, in San Francisco, California.
The purposes of this meeting are to
take action on the minutes of a previous
Board meeting; to provide the
Chairperson’s report; to provide the
Interim Leadership Team’s report; to
provide partners’ reports; to provide
committee reports; to take action on the
formation and composition of Board
committees; to take action on the Audit,
Finance, Governance and Human
Resources, Planning and Real Estate,
and Programs and Communications
committee charters; and to receive
public comment in accordance with the
Trust’s Public Outreach Policy.
Individuals requiring special
accommodation at this meeting, such as
needing a sign language interpreter,
should contact Mollie Matull at
415.561.5300 prior to October 1, 2015.
Time: The meeting will begin at 6:30
p.m. on Thursday, October 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Officers’ Club, 50 Moraga Avenue,
Presidio of San Francisco.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Andersen, Acting General
Counsel, the Presidio Trust, 103
Montgomery Street, P.O. Box 29052, San
Francisco, California 94129–0052,
Telephone: 415.561.5300.
Dated: September 3, 2015.
Andrea Andersen,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015–22857 Filed 9–9–15; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–75827; File No. SR–BX–
2015–032]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Establish
a New Auction, BX PRISM
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
September 3, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
19, 2015, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend BX
rules at Chapter VI, Section 9, which is
currently reserved, to establish a priceimprovement mechanism on BX.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://
nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P
1 15
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. On
September 2, 2015, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, from interested
persons.
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to establish a priceimprovement mechanism, ‘‘PRISM,’’ on
the Exchange, which includes automatch functionality in which a
Participant (an ‘‘Initiating Participant’’)
may electronically submit for execution
an order it represents as agent on behalf
of a Public Customer,4 Professional
3 BX filed Amendment No. 1 to correct an
inadvertent rule text error in Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(6) by removing stray brackets. Also, BX
filed this amendment to conform rule text in
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(K) to the language in the
proposed 19b4 for clarity and consistency.
4 For purposes of this Rule, a Public Customer
order does not include a Professional order, and
therefore a Professional would not be entitled to
Public Customer priority as described herein. A
Public Customer means a person that is not a broker
or dealer in securities. See BX Options Rules at
Chapter I, Section 1(a)(50). A Public Customer order
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54601
customer, broker dealer, or any other
entity (‘‘PRISM Order’’) against
principal interest or against any other
order it represents as agent (an
‘‘Initiating Order’’) provided it submits
the PRISM Order for electronic
execution into the PRISM Auction
(‘‘Auction’’) pursuant to the proposed
Rule.5 The Exchange intends to retitle
Chapter VI, Section 9, which is
currently reserved, as ‘‘Price
Improvement Auction (‘‘PRISM’’).’’ The
Exchange believes that the PRISM
auction, as proposed herein, will
encourage BX Market Makers to quote at
the NBBO with additional size and
thereby result in tighter and deeper
markets, resulting in more liquidity on
BX. Specifically, by offering BX Market
Makers the ability to receive priority in
the proposed allocation during the
PRISM auction up to the size of their
quote, a BX Market Maker will be
encouraged to quote with additional
size outside of the PRISM auction at the
best and most aggressive prices. BX
believes that this incentive may result in
a narrowing of quotes and thus further
enhance BX’s market quality. Within the
PRISM auction, BX believes that the
rules that are proposed will encourage
BX Market Makers to compete
vigorously to provide the opportunity
for price improvement in a competitive
auction process.
Auction Eligibility Requirements
All options traded on the Exchange
are eligible for PRISM. Proposed Rule
Chapter VI, Section 9(i) describes the
circumstances under which an Initiating
Participant may initiate an Auction. The
Initiating Participant may initiate an
Auction provided the conditions which
follow are met: If the PRISM Order is for
the account of a Public Customer the
Initiating Participant must stop the
entire PRISM Order at a price that is
equal to or better than the National Best
Bid/Offer displayed (‘‘NBBO’’) on the
opposite side of the market from the
PRISM Order, provided that such price
must be at least one minimum trading
increment specified in Chapter VI,
Section 5 6 better than any limit order
does not include a Professional order for purposes
of BX Rule at Chapter VI, Section 10(a)(C)(1)(a),
which governs allocation priority. A ‘‘Professional’’
means any person or entity that (i) is not a broker
or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more than 390
orders in listed options per day on average during
a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s).
A Participant or a Public Customer may, without
limitation, be a Professional. All Professional orders
shall be appropriately marked by Participants. See
BX Rules at Chapter I, Section 1(a)(49).
5 BX will only conduct an auction for Simple
Orders.
6 The Board may establish minimum quoting
increments for options contracts traded on BX
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
Continued
10SEN1
54602
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
on the limit order book on the same side
of the market as the PRISM Order.7 If
the PRISM Order is for the account of
a broker dealer or any other person or
entity that is not a Public Customer, the
Initiating Participant must stop the
entire PRISM at a price that is the better
of: (i) The displayed BX BBO price
improved by at least the minimum
trading increment on the same side of
the market as the PRISM Order, or (ii)
the PRISM Order’s limit price (if the
order is a limit order), provided in
either case that such price is at or better
than the displayed NBBO.8 There is a
distinction between proposed Chapter
VI, Section 9(i)(A) and Section 9(i)(B) in
that a PRISM Order that is a Public
Customer Order must trade at an
improved price if there is a limit order
on the book. A PRISM Order that is for
a non-Customer (account of a brokerdealer or any other person or entity that
is not a Public Customer) is always
required to improve the same side of the
BX BBO even if there is no resting limit
order on the book.
PRISM Orders that do not comply
with these aforementioned requirements
are not eligible to initiate an Auction
and will be rejected. Also, PRISM
Orders submitted at or before the
opening of trading are not eligible to
initiate an Auction and will be rejected.
PRISM Orders submitted during the
final two seconds of the trading session
in the affected series are not eligible to
initiate an Auction and will be rejected.
Finally, an Initiating Order may not be
a solicited order for the account of any
BX Options Market Maker assigned in
the affected series.9
Auction Process
Only one Auction may be conducted
at a time in any given series. Once
commenced, an Auction may not be
cancelled and would proceed as
described herein. To initiate the
Auction, the Initiating Participant must
mark the PRISM Order for Auction
processing, and specify either: (a) A
single price at which it seeks to execute
the PRISM Order (a ‘‘stop price’’); (b)
that it is willing to automatically match
as principal or as agent on behalf of an
Initiating Order the price and size of all
PRISM Auction Notifications (‘‘PAN’’)
responses, and trading interest (‘‘automatch’’) in which case the PRISM Order
will be stopped at the NBBO on the
Options. The minimum trading increment for
options contracts traded on BX Options will be one
(1) cent for all series (‘‘Minimum Increment’’). See
BX Rules at Chapter VI, Section 5(b).
7 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(A).
8 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(B).
9 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(C)
through (G).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Initiating Order side; 10 or (c) that it is
willing to either: (i) Stop the entire
order at a single stop price and automatch PAN responses and trading
interest at a price or prices that improve
the stop price to a specified price (a ‘‘No
Worse Than’’ or ‘‘NWT’’ price); (ii) stop
the entire order at a single stop price
and auto-match all PAN responses and
trading interest at or better than the stop
price; or (iii) stop the entire order at the
NBBO on the Initiating Order side, and
auto-match PAN responses and trading
interest at a price or prices that improve
the stop price up to the NWT price. In
all cases, if the BX BBO on the same
side of the market as the PRISM Order
represents a limit order on the book, the
stop price must be at least the Minimum
Increment better than the booked limit
order’s limit price. Once the Initiating
Participant has submitted a PRISM
Order for processing as described
herein, such PRISM Order may not be
modified or cancelled. Under no
circumstances will the Initiating
Participant receive an allocation
percentage of more than 50% with one
competing order or 40% with multiple
competing orders at the final price
point, except for rounding, when
competing orders have contracts
available for execution.11 Under any of
the circumstances described above, the
stop price or NWT price may be
improved to the benefit of the PRISM
Order during the Auction, but may not
be cancelled. When starting an Auction,
the Initiating Participant may submit the
Initiating Order with a designation of
‘‘surrender’’ to other PRISM Participants
(‘‘Surrender’’), which will result in the
Initiating Participant forfeiting priority
and trade allocation privileges.12 If
Surrender is specified the Initiating
Order will only trade if there is not
enough interest available to fully
execute the PRISM Order at prices
which are equal to or improve upon the
stop price.13 The Surrender function
will never result in more than the
maximum allowable allocation
percentage to the Initiating Participant
than that which the Initiating
Participant would have otherwise
10 This is accomplished by marking the Initiating
Order with a market (MKT) price.
11 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1).
12 The Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated’s (‘‘CBOE’’) has a process whereby
initiating participants may elect to receive last
priority in an allocation. See CBOE Rule
6.74A(b)(3)(J) (Automated Improvement Mechanism
(‘‘AIM’’)). See also MIAX Rule 5.15(A)(a)(2)(iii)(J).
BX will allow surrender only for the entire amount,
not for a partial amount.
13 Surrender will not be applied if both the
Initiating Order and PRISM Order are Public
Customer Orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
received in accordance with the
allocation procedures set forth in this
Rule.14 Surrender information will not
be available to other market participants
and may not be modified.
When the Exchange receives a PRISM
Order for Auction processing, a PAN
detailing the side, size and options
series of the PRISM Order will be sent
over the Exchange’s Specialized Quote
Feed (‘‘SQF’’).15 The Auction will last
for a period of time, as determined by
the Exchange and announced on the
Nasdaq Trader Web site. The Auction
period will be no less than one hundred
milliseconds 16 and no more than one
second.17 Any person or entity may
submit a response to the PAN, provided
such response is properly marked
specifying price, size and side of the
market. PAN responses will not be
visible to Auction participants,
including the initiator, and will not be
disseminated to OPRA. The minimum
price increment for PAN responses and
for an Initiating Participant’s stop price
and/or NWT price would be the
minimum price improvement increment
established pursuant to proposed rule at
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1).18
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’)
staff distributed a survey to all Phlx
market maker firms inquiring as to the
timeframe within which these market
participants respond to an auction with
a duration time ranging from less than
fifty (50) milliseconds to more than one
(1) second. The market marker firms on
Phlx represent membership similar to
BX Market Makers.19 An overwhelming
number of the market maker firms that
responded to the survey indicated that
they were capable of responding to
auctions with a duration time of at least
50 milliseconds.20 Based on the results
of the survey, the Exchange believes that
allowing for an auction period of no less
than one hundred (100) milliseconds
14 This concept of Surrender is similar to a
forfeiture concept on the BOX Options Exchange
LLC (‘‘BOX’’). See BOX Rule 7150(g) regarding PIP,
its price improvement auction.
15 SQF is available to Market Makers at no cost.
The Depth Feed is available to all other market
participants that pay to subscribe to the service to
receive broadcast information regarding auctions.
16 BOX’s PIP auction is a duration of one hundred
milliseconds, commencing on the dissemination of
the PIP broadcast. See BOX Rule 7150(f)(1).
17 CBOE’s AIM auction is a duration of one
second. See CBOE Rule 6.74A(b)(1)(C).
18 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(2) through (6).
19 Ninety (90) percent of the BX Market Maker
firms participated in the survey.
20 Of the thirty five (35) Phlx market maker firms
that were surveyed, twenty (20) of these market
makers responded to the survey and of those
respondents 100% indicated that that their firm
could respond to auctions with a duration time of
at least 50 milliseconds. This survey was conducted
in May 2014.
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
and no more than one (1) second would
provide a meaningful opportunity for
BX Participants to respond to the PRISM
Auction while at the same time
facilitating the prompt execution of
orders. The Exchange believes that BX
Participants will have sufficient time to
ensure competition for PRISM Orders,
and could provide orders within the
PRISM auction additional opportunities
for price improvement.
BX believes the proposed rule change
could provide orders within PRISM an
opportunity for price improvement.
Also, the shorter duration of time for the
auction reduce the market risk for all
Participants executing trades in PRISM.
Initiating Participants are required to
guarantee an execution at the NBBO or
at a better price, and are subject to
market risk while their PRISM Order is
exposed to other BX Participants. While
other Participants are also subject to
market risk, those providing responses
in PRISM may cancel or modify their
orders. BX believes that the Initiating
Participant acts in a critical role within
the PRISM auction. Their willingness to
guarantee the orders entered into PRISM
an execution at NBBO or a better price
is the keystone to an order gaining the
opportunity for price improvement. BX
believes that allowing for an auction
period of no less than one hundred
milliseconds and no more than one
second will benefit Participants trading
in PRISM. BX believes it is in these
Participants’ best interests to minimize
the auction time while continuing to
allow Participants adequate time to
electronically respond. Both the order
being exposed and the responding
orders are subject to market risk during
the auction.
While some Participants may wait to
respond until later in the auction,
presumably to minimize their market
risk, the Exchange believes that a
majority of the orders would respond
earlier in the auction. Based on
experience with the Phlx’s PIXL
mechanism on BX’s affiliated exchange,
BX believes that 100 milliseconds will
continue to provide all market
participants with sufficient time to
respond, compete, and provide price
improvement for orders and will
provide investors and other market
participants with more timely
executions, thereby reducing their
market risk. The proposed rule allows
people to respond quickly at the most
favorable price while reducing the risk
that the market will move against the
response.
BX believes that its Participants
operate electronic systems that enable
them to react and respond to orders in
a meaningful way in fractions of a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
second. BX believes that its Participants
will be able to compete within 100
milliseconds and this is a sufficient
amount of time to respond to, compete
for, and provide price improvement for
orders, and will provide investors and
other market participants with more
timely executions, and reduce their
market risk.
Finally, with respect to the impact of
this proposal, more specifically the
timing of the responses proposed
herein, on System 21 capacity, BX has
analyzed its capacity and represents that
it and the Options Price Reporting
Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) have the necessary
systems capacity to handle the potential
additional traffic associated with
auction transactions resulting
specifically from the implementation of
the auction period of no less than one
hundred milliseconds and no more than
one second. Additionally, in terms of
overall capacity the Exchange represents
that its Systems will be able to
sufficiently maintain an audit trail for
order and trade information with the
PRISM auction.
A PAN response size at any given
price point may not exceed the size of
the PRISM Order. A PAN response with
a size greater than the size of the PRISM
Order will be rejected. A PAN response
must be equal to or better than the
NBBO at the time of receipt of the PAN
response. PAN responses may be
modified or cancelled during the
Auction.22 A PAN response submitted
with a price that is outside the
displayed NBBO will be rejected. PAN
responses on the same side of the
market as the PRISM Order are
considered invalid and will be rejected.
Finally, multiple PAN responses from
the same Participant may be submitted
during the Auction. Multiple orders at
a particular price point submitted by a
Participant in response to a PAN may
not exceed, in the aggregate, the size of
the PRISM Order.23
Conclusion of an Auction
The PRISM Auction would conclude
at the earlier of the end of the Auction
period, any time the BX BBO crosses the
PRISM Order stop price on the same
side of the market as the PRISM Order 24
21 The term ‘‘System’’ is defined in BX Rules at
Chapter VI, Section 1(a).
22 The modification and cancellation of a PAN
response will be similar to the manner in which a
cancel-replace order would be handled outside of
the auction process. See BX Rules at Chapter VI,
Section 1(e)(1).
23 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(7) through (10).
24 This provision regarding the BX BBO crossing
the PRISM Order stop price on the same side of the
market as the PRISM Order, as a conclusion to a
PRISM Auction, shall be effective subject to a pilot
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54603
or any time there is a trading halt 25 on
the Exchange in the affected series.26
If the Auction concludes at the earlier
of the BX BBO crossing the PRISM
Order stop price on the same side of the
market as the PRISM Order or any time
there is a trading halt on the Exchange
in the affected series, the entire PRISM
Order will be executed as follows: (1) In
the case of the BX BBO crossing the
PRISM Order stop price, the best
response price(s) or, if the stop price is
the best price in the Auction, at the stop
price, unless the best response price is
equal to or better than the price of a
limit order resting on the Order Book on
the same side of the market as the
PRISM Order, in which case the PRISM
Order will be executed against that
response, but at a price that is at the
minimum trading increment better than
the price of such limit order at the time
of the conclusion of the Auction; or (2)
in the case of a trading halt on the
Exchange in the affected series, the stop
price, in which case the PRISM Order
will be executed solely against the
Initiating Order. In the event of a trading
halt, since the Initiating Participant has
guaranteed that an execution will occur
at the stop price (or better), and PAN
responses offer no such guarantee, the
stop price is the only valid price at
which to execute the PRISM Order, and
the Initiating Member is the appropriate
contra-side.
Any unexecuted PAN responses will
be cancelled.27 An unrelated market or
marketable limit order (against the BX
BBO) on the opposite side of the market
from the PRISM Order received during
the Auction will not cause the Auction
to end early and will execute against
interest outside of the Auction.28 If
contracts remain from such unrelated
order at the time the auction ends, they
will be considered for participation in
the order allocation process.29
Order Allocation—Size Pro-Rata
At the conclusion of the Auction, the
PRISM Order will be allocated at the
best price(s) as follows for underlying
symbols which are designated as Size
period scheduled to expire July 18, 2016, as
proposed.
25 This provision regarding the trading halt, as a
conclusion to a PRISM Auction, shall be effective
subject to a pilot period scheduled to expire July
18, 2016, as proposed.
26 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(B).
27 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(C). The Exchange will not route away any
orders to another market center submitted into the
PRISM auction.
28 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(D).
29 This provision shall be effective for a pilot
period scheduled to expire on July 18, 2016, as
proposed.
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
54604
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
Pro-Rata, as described in Chapter VI,
Section10(1)(C)(1)(a) with priority as is
described below. First, Public Customer
orders would have time priority at each
price level. Next, the Initiating
Participant would be allocated after
Public Customer Orders.
If the Initiating Participant selected
the single stop price option of the
PRISM Auction, PRISM executions will
occur at prices that improve the stop
price, and then at the stop price with up
to 40% of the remaining contracts after
Public Customer interest is satisfied
being allocated to the Initiating
Participant the stop price. However, if
only one other Participant matches the
stop price, then the Initiating
Participant may be allocated up to 50%
of the contracts executed at such price.
Remaining contracts would be allocated,
pursuant to proposed Chapter VI,
Section 9(ii)(E)(3) through (5), among
remaining quotes, orders and PAN
responses at the stop price. Thereafter,
remaining contracts, if any, would be
allocated to the Initiating Participant.
The allocation will account for
Surrender, if applicable.
If the Initiating Participant selected
the auto-match option of the PRISM
Auction the Initiating Participant would
be allocated an equal number of
contracts as the aggregate size of all
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at each price point until a price point is
reached where the balance of the order
can be fully executed, except that the
Initiating Participant would be entitled
to receive up to 40% of the contracts
remaining at the final price point
(including situations where the stop
price is the final price) after Public
Customer interest has been satisfied but
before remaining interest. If there are
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at the final price point the contracts will
be allocated to such interest pursuant to
proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(3)
through (5). Any remaining contracts
would be allocated to the Initiating
Participant.
In the case of a PRISM, if the
Initiating Participant selected the ‘‘stop
and NWT’’ option of the PRISM
Auction, contracts would be allocated as
follows: (i) First to quotes, orders and
PAN responses at prices better than the
NWT price (if any), beginning with the
best price, pursuant to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(3) through
(5), at each price point; and (ii) next, to
quotes, orders and PAN responses at
prices at the Initiating Participant’s
NWT price and better than the Initiating
Participant’s stop price, beginning with
the NWT price. The Initiating
Participant would be allocated an equal
number of contracts as the aggregate size
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
of all other quotes, orders and PAN
responses at each price point, except
that the Initiating Participant would be
entitled to receive up to 40% (multiple
competing orders) or 50% (one
competing order) of the contracts
remaining at the final price point
(including situations where the final
price is the stop price), after Public
Customer interest has been satisfied but
before remaining interest. In the case of
an Initiating Order with a NWT price at
the market, the Initiating Participant
would be allocated an equal number of
contracts as the aggregate size of all
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at all price points, except that the
Initiating Participant would be entitled
to receive up to 40% of the contracts
remaining at the final price point
(including situations where the final
price is the stop price), after Public
Customer interest has been satisfied but
before remaining interest. If there are
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at the final price point the contracts will
be allocated to such interest pursuant to
proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(3)
through (5). Any remaining contracts
would be allocated to the Initiating
Participant.30
Next, BX Options Market Makers that
were at a price that is equal to or
better 31 than the displayed NBBO on
the opposite side of the market from the
PRISM Order at the time of initiation of
the PRISM Auction (‘‘Priority Market
Makers’’) would have priority up to
their displayed quote size in the NBBO
which was present when the PRISM
Auction was initiated (‘‘Initial
Displayed NBBO’’) at each price level at
or better than such Initial Displayed
NBBO after Public Customer and
Initiating Participants have received
allocations.32 Priority Market Maker
quotes, orders, and PAN responses will
be allocated pursuant to the Size ProRata algorithm set forth in Exchange
Rules at Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(B).33
30 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(E)(2)(a) through (c).
31 Price Improving Orders are submitted to the
System at price increments smaller than the
displayed Minimum Price Variation and are
displayed as part of the BX BBO at the Minimum
Price Variation. See BX Rules at Chapter VI, Section
1(e)(6). Price Improving interest from a BX Market
Maker will be considered as Priority Market Maker
interest provided the BX BBO is equal to the NBBO.
32 MIAX allocates executions resulting from
Priority Public Customer interest and priority
Market Maker quotes ahead of other interest.
MIAX’s system may designate Market Maker quotes
as either priority quotes or non-priority quotes in
accordance with the provisions in MIAX Rule
517(b). The Exchange is prioritizing Priority Market
Maker allocations in the proposed BX PRISM
Auction in a similar manner, ahead of other nonPublic Customer interest.
33 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(E)(3).
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Priority Market Maker status is only
valid for the duration of the particular
PRISM auction.
Next, Non-Priority Market Makers and
Priority Market Maker interest which
exceeded their displayed size in the
Initial Displayed NBBO would have
priority at each price level at or better
than the Initial Displayed NBBO after
Public Customer, Initiating Participants
and Priority Market Makers have
received allocations. Non-Priority
Market Maker and Priority Market
Maker interest which exceeded their
displayed size in the Initial Displayed
NBBO will be allocated pursuant to the
Size Pro-Rata algorithm set forth in
Exchange Rules at Chapter VI, Section
10(1)(B).34
Finally, all other interest will be
allocated, after proposed Chapter VI,
Section 9(ii)(E)(1) through (4) have been
satisfied. Such interest will be allocated
pursuant to the Size Pro-Rata algorithm
set forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter
VI, Section 10(1)(B).35
Order Allocation—Price/Time
At the conclusion of the Auction, the
PRISM Order will be allocated at the
best price(s) as indicated below for
underlying symbols designated as Price/
Time as described in proposed Chapter
VI, Section10(1)(C)(2)(i). First, Public
Customer orders would have time
priority at each price level. Next, the
Initiating Participant would be allocated
after Public Customer Orders.
If the Initiating Participant selected
the single stop price option of the
PRISM Auction, PRISM executions will
occur at prices that improve the stop
price, and then at the stop price with up
to 40% of the remaining contracts after
Public Customer interest is satisfied
being allocated to the Initiating
Participant the stop price. However, if
only one other Participant matches the
stop price, then the Initiating
Participant may be allocated up to 50%
of the contracts executed at such price.
Remaining contracts would be allocated
pursuant to proposed Chapter VI,
Section 9(ii)(F)(3) and (4), among
remaining quotes, orders and PAN
responses at the stop price. Thereafter,
remaining contracts, if any, would be
allocated to the Initiating Participant.
The allocation will account for
Surrender, if applicable.
If the Initiating Participant selected
the auto-match option of the PRISM
Auction the Initiating Participant would
be allocated an equal number of
34 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(E)(4).
35 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(E)(5).
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
contracts as the aggregate size of all
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at each price point until a price point is
reached where the balance of the order
can be fully executed, except that the
Initiating Participant would be entitled
to receive up to 40% or 50% of the
contracts remaining at the final price
point (including situations where the
stop price is the final price), after Public
Customer interest has been satisfied but
before remaining interest. If there are
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at the final price point the contracts will
be allocated to such interest pursuant to
proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(3)
and (4). Any remaining contracts would
be allocated to the Initiating Participant.
In the case of a PRISM, if the Initiating
Participant selected the ‘‘stop and
NWT’’ option of the PRISM Auction,
contracts would be allocated as follows:
(i) First to quotes, orders and PAN
responses at prices better than the NWT
price (if any), beginning with the best
price, pursuant to proposed Chapter VI,
Section 9(ii)(F)(3) and (4), at each price
point; and (ii) next, to quotes, orders
and PAN responses at prices at the
Initiating Participant’s NWT price and
better than the Initiating Participant’s
stop price, beginning with the NWT
price. The Initiating Participant would
be allocated an equal number of
contracts as the aggregate size of all
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at each price point, except that the
Initiating Participant would be entitled
to receive up to 40% of the contracts
remaining at the final price point
(including situations where the final
price is the stop price), after Public
Customer interest has been satisfied but
before remaining interest. In the case of
an Initiating Order with a NWT price at
the market, the Initiating Participant
would be allocated an equal number of
contracts as the aggregate size of all
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at all price points, except that the
Initiating Participant would be entitled
to receive up to 40% of the contracts
remaining at the final price point
(including situations where the final
price is the stop price), after Public
Customer interest has been satisfied but
before remaining interest. If there are
other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at the final price point the contracts will
be allocated to such interest pursuant to
proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(3)
and (4). Any remaining contracts would
be allocated to the Initiating Participant.
Next, Priority Market Makers that
were at a price that is equal to or better
than the displayed NBBO on the
opposite side of the market from the
PRISM Order at the time of initiation of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
PRISM Auction would have priority up
to their displayed quote size in the
Initial Displayed NBBO at each price
level better than the Initial Displayed
NBBO, after Public Customer and
Initiating Participants have received
allocations. Priority Market Maker
interest at prices better than the Initial
Displayed NBBO will be allocated
pursuant to the Size Pro-Rata algorithm
set forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter
VI, Section 10(1)(B). Priority Market
Maker interest at a price equal to or
inferior to the Initial Displayed NBBO
will not have priority over other
participants and will be allocated
pursuant to the Price/Time algorithm set
forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter VI,
Section 10(1)(A).36
Finally, all other interest will be
allocated, after proposed Chapter VI,
Section 9(ii)(E)(1) through (3) have been
satisfied. Such interest will be allocated
pursuant to the Price/Time algorithm set
forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter VI,
Section 10(1)(A).37 The Exchange
believes using the Price/Time allocation
method for interest remaining after
proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(1)
through (3) have been satisfied provides
consistency with the underlying symbol
allocation designation. Since the
Exchange considers all interest present
in the System, and not solely auction
Responses, for execution against the
PRISM Order, those participants who
are not explicit responders to the
auction will expect executions based on
their Price/Time priority. In addition,
the Exchange believes executing such
remaining interest in a Price/Time
fashion does not unfairly advantage/
disadvantage one participant over
another since executions are done with
price priority first and time only
becoming a factor when considering
equally priced interest for execution.38
Other options markets utilize Price/
Time in auctions.39 With respect to
either allocation method, Size Pro-Rata
or Price/Time, a single quote, order or
PAN response would not be allocated a
number of contracts that is greater than
its size. Residual odd lots will be
allocated in time-priority among interest
with the highest priority. Rounding of
36 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(F)(3).
37 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(F)(4).
38 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(F)(2)(a) through (c).
39 The International Securities Exchange, LLC
(‘‘ISE’’) executes Priority Customer interest in a
Price/Time fashion within its PIM auction. See ISE
Rule 723. Complex orders are also executed within
its auction in price time priority. See ISE Rule 722.
BOX also permits Price/Time priority within PIP
and COPIP. See BOX Rules 7150(g) and 7245(g). See
also example number 14 below.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54605
the Initiating Participant will be up or
down to the nearest integer,40 all other
rounding is down to the nearest integer.
If rounding results in an allocation of
less than one contract, then one contract
will be allocated to the Initiating
Participant only if the Initiating
Participant did not otherwise receive an
allocation.41 The Initiating Participant is
not eligible to receive residual contracts
if already allocated, unless no other
interest is available to trade. If there are
PAN responses that cross the thenexisting NBBO (provided such NBBO is
not crossed), such PAN responses will
be executed, if possible, at their limit
price(s). If the price of the PRISM
Auction is the same as that of an order
on the limit order book on the same side
of the market as the PRISM Order, the
PRISM Order may only be executed at
a price that is at least one minimum
trading increment better than the resting
order’s limit price or, if such resting
order’s limit price is equal to or crosses
the stop price, then the entire PRISM
Order will trade at the stop price with
all better priced interest being
considered for execution at the stop
price. Any unexecuted PAN responses
will be cancelled.42
With respect to Intermarket Sweep
Orders or ‘‘ISO’’ Orders,43 under any
allocation, if a PRISM Auction is
initiated for an order designated as an
ISO Order, all executions which are at
a price inferior to the Initial Displayed
NBBO would be allocated pursuant to
the Size Pro-Rata execution algorithm,
as described in Chapter VI, Section
10(1)(C)(1)(a), or Price/Time execution
algorithm, as described in Chapter VI,
Section 10(1)(C)(2)(i), and the
aforementioned priority in proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E) and (F)
would not apply, with the exception of
allocating to the Initiating Participant,
which will be allocated in accordance
with the priority as specified in
proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)
40 When the decimal is exactly 0.5, the rounding
direction is up to the nearest integer.
41 Similar rounding exists for BX’s Direct Market
Maker and Lead Market Maker. See BX Rules at
Chapter VI, Section 10.
42 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(G)–(J).
43 An ‘‘Intermarket Sweep Order’’ or ‘‘ISO’’ are
limit orders that are designated as ISOs in the
manner prescribed by BX and are executed within
the System by Participants at multiple price levels
without respect to Protected Quotations of other
Eligible Exchanges as defined in BX Rules at
Chapter XII, Section 1. ISOs may have any time-inforce designation except WAIT, are handled within
the System pursuant to BX Rules at Chapter VI,
Section 10 and would not be eligible for routing as
set out in BX Rules at Chapter VI, Section 11. ISOs
with a time-in-force designation of GTC are treated
as having a time-in-force designation of Day. See BX
Options Rules at Chapter VI, Section 1(e)(7).
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
54606
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
and (F).44 Specifically, a PRISM ISO is
the transmission of two orders for
crossing without regard for better priced
Protected Bids or Protected Offers
because the Participant transmitting the
PRISM ISO to the Exchange has,
simultaneously with the routing of the
PRISM ISO, routed one or more ISOs, as
necessary, to execute against the full
displayed size of any Protected Bid or
Protected Offer that is superior to the
starting PRISM Auction price and has
swept all interest in the Exchange’s
book priced better than the proposed
PRISM Auction starting price. The
Exchange will accept a PRISM ISO
provided the order adheres to the
PRISM Order acceptance requirements,
but without regard to the NBBO. The
Exchange will execute the PRISM ISO in
the same manner as other PRISM
Orders, except that it will not protect
prices away. Instead, order flow
providers will bear the responsibility to
clear all better priced interest away
simultaneously with submitting the
PRISM ISO Order. There is no other
impact to PRISM functionality.
Specifically, liquidity present at the end
of the PRISM Auction will continue to
be included in the PRISM Auction as it
is with PRISM Orders not marked as
ISOs. This order type is offered by other
options exchanges.45
With respect to Post Only Orders
resting on the book at the time the
PRISM Auction is initiated,46 these
orders will be executed if such order
would not result in the removal of
liquidity when executing in the PRISM
Auction, in accordance with Chapter VI,
Section 1(e)(10). A Post Only Order will
44 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(K).
45 See NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC Rules at
1080(n). PIXL ISO Orders are permissible. See also
CBOE Rule 6.53(q).
46 ‘‘Post-Only Orders’’ are orders that will not
remove liquidity from the System. Post- Only
Orders are to be ranked and executed on the
Exchange or cancelled, as appropriate, without
routing away to another market. Post-Only Orders
are evaluated at the time of entry with respect to
locking or crossing other orders as follows: (i) If a
Post-Only Order would lock or cross an order on
the System, the order will be re-priced to $.01
below the current low offer (for bids) or above the
current best bid (for offers) and displayed by the
System at one minimum price increment below the
current low offer (for bids) or above the current best
bid (for offers); and (ii) if a Post-Only Order would
not lock or cross an order on the System but would
lock or cross the NBBO as reflected in the protected
quotation of another market center, the order will
be handled pursuant to Chapter VI, Section
7(b)(3)(C). Participants may choose to have their
Post-Only Orders returned whenever the order
would lock or cross the NBBO or be placed on the
book at a price other than its limit price. Post-Only
Orders received prior to the opening cross or after
market close will be rejected. Post-Only Orders may
not have a time-in-force designation of Good Til
Cancelled or Immediate or Cancel. See BX Options
Rules at Chapter VI, Section 1(e)(10).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
be cancelled if it is eligible for an
execution in the PRISM Auction and
would be considered the remover of
liquidity.47 Post Only Orders submitted
by a Marker Maker during a PRISM
Auction will not be considered as
Priority Market Maker interest 48 but
will be considered pursuant to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(4) and
Section 9(ii)(F)(4).
Regulatory Concerns—Bona Fide
Transactions
The PRISM Auction may be used only
where there is a genuine intention to
execute a bona fide transaction. It will
be considered a violation of this Rule
and will be deemed conduct
inconsistent with just and equitable
principles of trade and a violation of
Rule 2110 if an Initiating Participant
submits a PRISM Order (initiating an
Auction) and also submits its own PAN
response in the same Auction.49 A
pattern or practice of submitting
multiple orders in response to a PAN at
a particular price point that exceed, in
the aggregate, the size of the PRISM
Order, will be deemed conduct
inconsistent with just and equitable
principles of trade and a violation of
Rule 2110.50 A pattern or practice of
submitting unrelated orders or quotes
that cross the stop price, causing a
PRISM Auction to conclude before the
end of the PRISM Auction period will
be deemed conduct inconsistent with
just and equitable principles of trade
and a violation of Rule 2110. It will also
be deemed conduct inconsistent with
just and equitable principles of trade
and a violation of Rule 2110 to engage
in a pattern of conduct where the
Initiating Participant breaks up a PRISM
Order into separate orders for the
purpose of gaining a higher allocation
percentage than the Initiating
Participant would have otherwise
received in accordance with the
allocation procedures contained in
proposed subparagraph (ii)(E) and (ii)(F)
to Chapter VI, Section 9.51
Crossing and Agency Orders
In lieu of the procedures in proposed
paragraphs (i)–(ii) to Chapter VI, Section
9, an Initiating Participant may enter a
PRISM Order for the account of a Public
47 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(L).
48 Only Market Maker interest submitted through
SQF will be eligible for Priority Market Maker
interest.
49 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(iii).
BX Rule 2110 states that, ‘‘A member, in the
conduct of its business, shall observe high
standards of commercial honor and just and
equitable principles of trade.’’
50 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(iv).
51 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(v).
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Customer paired with an order for the
account of a Public Customer and such
paired orders will be automatically
executed without a PRISM Auction. The
execution price for such a PRISM Order
must be expressed in the quoting
increment applicable to the affected
series. Such an execution may not trade
through the NBBO or at the same price
as any resting Public Customer order.52
BX Rules at Chapter VII, Section 12 53
prevents a Participant from executing
agency orders to increase its economic
gain from trading against the order
without first giving other trading
interests on the Exchange an
opportunity to either trade with the
agency order or to trade at the execution
price when the Participant was already
bidding or offering on the book.
However, the Exchange recognizes that
it may be possible for a Participant to
establish a relationship with a Public
Customer or other person to deny
agency orders the opportunity to
interact on the Exchange and to realize
similar economic benefits as it would
achieve by executing agency orders as
principal. It would be a violation of BX
Rules at Chapter VII, Section 12 for a
Participant to circumvent Chapter VII,
Section 12 by providing an opportunity
for (i) a Public Customer affiliated with
the Participant, or (ii) a Public Customer
with whom the Participant has an
arrangement that allows the Participant
to realize similar economic benefits
from the transaction as the Participant
would achieve by executing agency
orders as principal, to regularly execute
against agency orders handled by the
firm immediately upon their entry as
PRISM Public Customer-to-Public
Customer immediate crosses.54
Pilot Program Information to the
Commission
Subject to a Pilot expiring July 18,
2016, there will be no minimum size
requirement for orders to be eligible for
the Auction. During this Pilot Period,
52 See
proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(vi).
Rules at Chapter VI, Section 12, entitled
‘‘Anonymity’’ provides, ‘‘The transaction reports
produced by the System will indicate the details of
the transactions, and would not reveal contra party
identities. BX would reveal a Participant’s identity
in the following circumstances: (1) When a
registered clearing agency ceases to act for a
participant, or the Participant’s clearing firm, and
the registered clearing agency determines not to
guarantee the settlement of the Participant’s trades;
(2) for regulatory purposes or to comply with an
order of an arbitrator or court; (3) if both
Participants to the transaction consent; and (4)
unless otherwise instructed by a member, BX will
reveal to a member, no later than the end of the day
on the date an anonymous trade was executed,
when the member’s order has been decremented by
another order submitted by that same member.
54 See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section
6(vi)(a).
53 BX
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
the Exchange will submit certain data,
periodically as required by the
Commission, to provide supporting
evidence that, among other things, there
is meaningful competition for all size
orders, there are opportunities for
significant price improvement for orders
executed through PRISM and that there
is an active and liquid market
functioning on the Exchange outside of
the Auction mechanism. Any raw data
which is submitted to the Commission
will be provided on a confidential
basis.55
The Exchange represents that, in
support of its proposed pilot program, it
proposes three components on a pilot
basis: (1) Auction eligibility
requirements; (2) the early conclusion of
the PRISM Auction; and (3) no
minimum size requirement of orders.
the Exchange will provide the following
additional information on a monthly
basis:
(1) The number of contracts (of orders
of 50 contracts or greater) entered into
the PRISM;
(2) The number of contracts (of orders
of fewer than 50 contracts) entered into
the PRISM;
(3) The number of orders of 50
contracts or greater entered into the
PRISM; and
(4) The number of orders of fewer
than 50 contracts entered into the
PRISM.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Implementation
If the Commission approves this
proposed rule change, as amended, the
Exchange anticipates that it will deploy
PRISM within 45 days of approval.
Members will be notified of the
deployment date by way of an Options
Trader Alert posted on the Exchange’s
Web site.
Examples of PRISM Order Executions
EXAMPLE #1 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a))
(PRISM Contra & Priority Market Maker
interest fully satisfies PRISM order for
Pro-Rata or Price/Time):
NBBO = .97¥1.03
BX BBO = .95¥1.03 (60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts
stopped at 1.02 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 20 at 1.02 and Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond to sell 30 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, PRISM contra is
allocated 40 contracts at 1.02 (40%
carve out); Market Maker A and Market
55 See
proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(vii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Maker B each trade 30 contracts since
they are Priority Market Makers for 30
contracts. Market Maker C does zero.
The outcome in this example is the
same regardless of the underlying
symbol being designated as Pro-Rata or
Price/Time.
EXAMPLE #2 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (ProRata among Priority Market Maker
interest):
NBBO = .97¥1.03
BX BBO = .95¥1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts
stopped at 1.02 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond to sell 30 contracts at 1.02, and
Market Maker D responds to sell 10
contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 since he was only interest
offered at best price, PRISM contra is
allocated 36 contracts at 1.02 (40%
carve out); Market Maker A and Market
Maker B each trade 27 contracts (pro
rata among Priority Market Makers A
and B). Market Maker D does zero since
there were no contracts open after
Priority Market Maker A and Priority
Market Maker B were filled at that price.
EXAMPLE #3 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price/
Time symbol with contracts trading at
improving prices and at the initial
NBBO price):
NBBO = .97¥1.03
BX BBO = .95¥1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each (Market
Maker A arrived first)
PRISM Order to buy 90 contracts
stopped at 1.03 is received
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond to sell 10 contracts at 1.02, and
Market Maker D responds to sell 10
contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 since he was only interest
offered at best price; Market Maker A
and Market Maker B each trade 10
contracts at 1.02 since they have priority
status for up to 30 contracts; Market
Maker D then trades 10 contracts at
1.02; PRISM Contra trades 40% or 20
contracts at the stop price of 1.03.
Assuming Market Maker A was at the
BX BBO of 1.03 before Market Maker B,
Market Maker A would execute 30
contracts at 1.03. Market Maker B would
not trade any at 1.03 since the order is
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54607
filled before getting to his quote in a
price time fashion.
EXAMPLE #4 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (ProRata symbol with Market Makers
receiving both priority status and nonpriority status based on their size at
initial NBBO):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 90 contracts
stopped at 1.03 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond to sell 50 contracts at 1.02
(priority status for 30 contracts each and
non-priority status for 20 contracts
each), and Market Maker D responds to
sell 50 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 since he was only interest
offered at best price; Market Maker A
and Market Maker B each trade 30
contracts at 1.02 since they have priority
up to their size at the NBBO when the
auction started; Market Maker A, Market
Maker B, and Market Maker D then prorata split the balance of 20 contracts at
1.02 based on their remaining interest
size with Market Maker A being
allocated 4 contracts (=20/90*20),
Market Maker B being allocated 4 (=20/
90*20) contracts, and Market Maker D
being allocated 11 contracts (=50/90*20)
and the residual 1 contract being
allocated to one of the 3 MMs (Market
Maker A) in time priority.
EXAMPLE #5 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i))
(Initiating Order utilizes Auto-Match
specifying the No Worse Than (NWT)
feature for Pro-Rata or Price/Time):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 90 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.02 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond to sell 50 contracts at 1.02
(priority status for 30 contracts each and
non-priority status for 20 contracts
each), and Market Maker D responds to
sell 50 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 since he was only interest
offered at best price; PRISM Contra is
allocated 40% or 32 contracts at 1.02
since it will be the final price point,
Market Maker A and Market Maker B
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
54608
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
each trade 24 contracts at 1.02 since
they have priority ahead of Market
Maker D up to their size at the NBBO
when the auction started.
The outcome in this example is the
same regardless of Pro-Rata or Price/
Time designation.
EXAMPLE #6 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i))
(Pro-Rata Symbol with Market Makers
receiving both priority status and nonpriority status based on their size at
initial NBBO and Initiating Order
utilizes NWT feature):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03 (60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.02 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond to sell 50 contracts at 1.02, and
Market Maker D responds to sell 50
contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 since he was only interest
offered at best price; PRISM Contra is
allocated 40% or 56 contracts at 1.02
since it will be the final price point;
Market Maker A and Market Maker B
each trade 30 contracts at 1.02 since
they have priority up to their size at the
NBBO when the auction started; Market
Maker A, Market Maker B, and Market
Maker D then pro-rata split the balance
with Market Maker A and Market Maker
B each trading 5 additional contracts at
1.02 (20/90*24) and Market Maker D
trading 13 contracts at 1.02 (50/90*24).
The residual 1 contract will be allocated
among the three MM (Market Maker A)
in time priority.
EXAMPLE #7 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i))
(Price/Time symbol with Market Makers
receiving both priority status and nonpriority status based on their size at
initial NBBO, Initiating Order utilizes
NWT feature, and quotes move during
Auction):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.01 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond in that time order (A before B)
to sell 50 contracts at 1.02 (30 of the 50
contracts are considered as Priority
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Market Maker interest), and Market
Maker D responds to sell 50 contracts at
1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote and BX BBO becomes
.95–1.02 for 30 contracts and NBBO
becomes .97–1.02. Market Maker A
maintains his Priority Market Maker
status.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra matches
and trades 10 at 1.01 based on his NWT
price of 1.01; PRISM Contra is allocated
40% or 52 contracts at 1.02 since it will
be the final price point; Market Maker
A and Market Maker B each trade 30
contracts at 1.02 since they have priority
up to their size at the NBBO when the
auction started (since Market Maker A
has both a response and quote interest,
Market Maker A’s 30 contracts are
allocated in a time fashion among
Market Maker A’s interest at 1.02 with
each of the responses trading all 30
contracts); the residual 18 contracts are
traded in a Price/Time fashion at 1.02
among residual Market Maker interest
with Market Maker A response trading
all 18 contracts.
EXAMPLE #8 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Pro
Rata symbol with Market Makers
receiving both priority status and nonpriority status based on their size at
initial NBBO and Initiating Order
utilizes NWT feature):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03 with Market Maker
A and Market Maker B offering 30
contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.01 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond in that order to sell 50 contracts
at 1.02 (30 of the 50 contracts will be
considered as Priority Market Maker),
and Market Maker D responds to sell 50
contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra matches
and trades 10 at 1.01; PRISM Contra is
allocated 40% or 52 contracts at 1.02
since it will be the final price point;
remaining allocation is in Pro-Rata
fashion with priority Market Maker
interest trading ahead of non-Priority
Market Maker interest, Market Maker A
and Market Maker B each trade 30
contracts as Priority Market Maker then
Market Maker A, Market Maker B, and
Market Maker D Pro Rata split the
balance with Market Maker A and
Market Maker B each trading 4 contracts
at 1.02 (20/90 *18) and Market Maker D
trading 10 contracts at 1.02 (50/90*18).
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
EXAMPLE #9 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i))
(Price/Time symbol with Market Makers
receiving both priority status and nonpriority status based on their size at
initial NBBO, Initiating Order utilizes
NWT feature, and quotes move during
Auction and Public Customer Order
received):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.01 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond in that order to sell 50 contracts
at 1.02 (30 of the 50 contracts are
considered as Priority Market Maker),
and Market Maker D responds to sell 50
contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote (but maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO
becomes .95–1.02 for 30 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97–1.02. Then, a Public
Customer order is received on the
opposite side of the PRISM Order,
offering 10 contracts at 1.02 which does
not cause an early auction termination.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra matches
and trades 10 at 1.01; Public Customer
order then trades 10 contracts at 1.02.
After Public Customer is satisfied,
PRISM Contra is allocated 40% of
remaining which equates to 48
contracts; Priority Market Maker interest
is then traded with Market Maker A
trading 30 contracts at 1.02 (all allocated
to response since first in time priority of
Market Maker A interest at 1.02) and
Market Maker B response trading 30
contracts at 1.02. The residual 12
contracts are allocated among remaining
Market Maker interest at 1.02 in a Price/
Time fashion, with Market Maker A
response trading all 12 contracts.
EXAMPLE #10 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i))
(Price/Time symbol with Market Makers
receiving both priority status and nonpriority status based on their size at
initial NBBO, Initiating Order utilizes
NWT feature, and Priority Market Maker
quote moves during Auction and
maintains priority status and Public
Customer Order received):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.01 is received.
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A responds to sell 10 contracts at
1.02 (considered as Priority Market
Maker), Market Maker B responds to sell
50 contracts at 1.02 (30 of the 50
contracts are considered as Priority
Market Maker), and Market Maker D
responds to sell 50 contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO
becomes .95–1.02 for 10 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97–1.02.
Then, a Public Customer order is
received offering 10 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra matches
and trades 10 at 1.01; Public Customer
order then trades 10 contracts at 1.02.
After Public Customer is satisfied,
PRISM Contra is allocated 40% of
remaining which equates to 48
contracts; Priority Market Maker interest
is then traded with Market Maker A
trading 20 contracts at 1.02 (all of his
interest, response and quote, since it is
less than the 30 he is entitled to as a
priority Market Maker) and Market
Maker B response trades 30 contracts at
1.02. The remaining 22 contracts are
allocated in price time fashion among
remaining Market Maker interest at 1.02
with Market Maker B response trading
20 contracts and Market Maker D
response trading 2 contracts.
EXAMPLE #11 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price/
Time symbol with all executions
occurring at initial NBBO price):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03 (60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each arriving
in that order
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts
stopped at 1.03 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 20 at 1.03 and Public
Customer offers 2 contracts at 1.03.
Auction ends, Public Customer trades
2 contracts at 1.03 and PRISM contra is
allocated 40% of residual or 39
contracts at 1.03; remaining allocation is
purely Price/Time with Market Maker A
trading 30 contracts and Market Maker
B trading 29 contracts.
EXAMPLE #12 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (ProRata symbol with all executions
occurring at initial NBBO price and
Public Customer order received):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03 (60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each arriving
in that order
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts
stopped at 1.03 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 20 at 1.03 and Public
Customer offers 2 contracts at 1.03.
Auction ends, Public Customer trades
2 contracts at 1.03 and PRISM contra is
allocated 40% of residual or 39
contracts at 1.03; remaining allocation is
pro-rata among Priority Market Maker
interest with Market Maker A trading 29
contracts (30/60*59), Market Maker B
trading 29 contracts (30/60*59), and the
residual 1 contract being allocated to
Market Maker A based on time.
EXAMPLE #13 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i))
(Price/Time symbol with Initiating
Order specifying Auto-Match with the
NWT feature and non-Market Maker
interest is present for execution):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each (arriving
in that order)
PRISM Order to buy 300 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.01 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 5 at 1.01, Market Maker
A responds to sell 10 contracts at 1.02,
Market Maker B responds to sell 50
contracts at 1.02 (30 of the 50 contracts
are considered as Priority Market
Maker), and Market Maker D responds
to sell 40 contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote for 10 contracts at 1.02,
now alone at that price, (maintains
Priority Market Maker status) and BX
BBO becomes .95–1.02 for 10 contracts
and a Firm order arrives offering 10
contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
5 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra matches
and trades 5 at 1.01; All 1.02 interest is
then allocated as follows: Priority
Market Maker interest is fully allocated
with Market Maker A response trading
10, Market Maker B response trading 30,
and Market Maker A quote trading 10 at
1.02. Non-Priority MM is allocated in
Price/Time with Market Maker B trading
an additional 20 contracts and Market
Maker D trading 40 contracts at 1.02.
After all Market Maker interest is
satisfied, the Firm order is allocated its
full size of 10 contracts at 1.02. The
PRISM Contra order matches the full
volume trading at 1.02 (b/c of NWT
price) which is 120 contracts. The
remaining 50 contracts are traded at
1.03 with the PRISM Contra trading
50% of remaining since only matching
one other participant or 25 contracts.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54609
The other 25 contracts are traded in
Price/Time fashion in accordance with
the underlying algorithm with Market
Maker B trading all 25 contracts at 1.03.
EXAMPLE #14 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i))
(Pro-Rata symbol with Initiating Order
specifying Auto-Match with the NWT
feature, non-Market Maker interest is
present for execution, Priority Market
Maker has multiple price levels of
interest, and executions occurring at
initial NBBO price):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each (arriving
in that order)
PRISM Order to buy 300 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.01 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 5 at 1.01, Market Maker
A responds to sell 10 contracts at 1.02
(considered as Priority Market Maker),
Market Maker B responds to sell 50
contracts at 1.02 (30 of the 50 contracts
are considered as Priority Market
Maker), Market Maker D responds to sell
40 contracts at 1.02, and Market Maker
A responds with 30 additional contracts
at 1.03 (considered as Priority Market
Maker).
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote (maintain Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO
becomes .95–1.02 for 10 contracts and a
Firm order arrives offering 10 contracts
at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
5 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra matches
and trades 5 at 1.01; All 1.02 interest is
then allocated as follows: Priority
Market Maker interest is fully allocated
with Market Maker A response trading
10, Market Maker B response trading 30,
and Market Maker A quote trading 10 at
1.02. Non-priority Market Maker is
allocated with Market Maker B trading
an additional 20 contracts and Market
Maker D trading 40 contracts at 1.02.
After all Market Maker interest is
satisfied, the Firm order is allocated its
full size of 10 contracts at 1.02. The
PRISM Contra order matches the full
volume trading at 1.02 (b/c of NWT
price) which is 120 contracts. The
remaining 50 contracts are traded at
1.03 with the PRISM Contra trading
40% of remaining or 20 contracts. The
other 30 contracts are traded in a ProRata fashion in accordance with the
underlying algorithm with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B as Priority
Market Maker each trading 15 contracts
at 1.03.
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
54610
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
EXAMPLE #15 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i))
(Price/Time symbol with Market Makers
receiving both priority status and nonpriority status at multiple price levels
based on their size at initial NBBO):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03 (20) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 10 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 200 contracts
stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of
1.01 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction (in the following
order), Market Maker C responds to sell
10 at 1.01, Market Maker A responds to
sell 40 at 1.01 (10 of 40 contracts is
considered Priority Market Maker),
Market Maker A and Market Maker B
each respond to sell 50 contracts at 1.02
(10 of 50 contracts is considered Priority
Market Maker), and Market Maker D
responds to sell 50 contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO
becomes .95–1.02 for 10 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97–1.02.
Then, a Public Customer order is
received offering 10 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker A trades
10 contracts at 1.01 as a priority MM,
then Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01
in price/time and Market Maker A
trades his additional 30 contracts at 1.01
which outsized his priority status, and
PRISM Contra matches and trades a
total of 50 at 1.01; Public Customer
order of 10 contracts trades at 1.02 then
PRISM Contra is allocated 40% of 90 or
36 contracts at 1.02. The remaining 54
contracts are then allocated at 1.02 with
Market Maker A and Market Maker B
trading 10 contracts each as priority
Market Maker and 34 contracts are then
allocated in price/time to Market Maker
A at 1.02.
EXAMPLE #16 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price/
Time symbol with Initiating Participant
utilizing Surrender):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 20 contracts
stopped at 1.03 marked as
‘Surrender’ is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 5 at 1.01, Market Maker
A responds to sell 5 contracts at 1.02,
Market Maker B responds to sell 20
contracts at 1.02, and Market Maker D
responds to sell 20 contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote (maintains Priority
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
Market Maker status) and BX BBO
becomes .95–1.02 for 5 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97–1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
5 at 1.01; Priority Market Maker interest
trades the remaining 15 contracts in a
Pro-Rata fashion: Market Maker A
executes 5 contracts (10/30*15) with all
5 being given to the Market Maker A
response since he was first in time order
of Market Maker A interest at 1.02 and
Market Maker B response executes 10
contracts (20/30*15) at 1.02. The PRISM
Contra executes no contracts.
EXAMPLE #17 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (ProRata symbol with Initiating Participant
utilizing Surrender):
NBBO = .97–1.03
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts
stopped at 1.02 marked as
‘Surrender’ is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 5 at 1.01, Market Maker
A responds to sell 5 contracts at 1.02,
Market Maker B responds to sell 40
contracts at 1.02, and Market Maker D
responds to sell 20 contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO
becomes .95–1.02 for 5 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97–1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
5 at 1.01; Priority Market Maker interest
at 1.02 then trades with Market Maker
A response executing 5 contracts,
Market Maker B response volume with
Priority status executes 30 contracts,
and Market Maker A quote executes 5
contracts; Non Priority Market Maker
interest at 1.02 then executes with
Market Maker B trading 10 contracts
and Market Maker D trading 20
contracts. The PRISM Contra then
executes the remaining 25 contracts at
1.02 since there is no other interest to
satisfy the PRISM Order at a price equal
to or better than the stop price of 1.02.
EXAMPLE #18 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price
Improving Orders counted as Priority
Market Maker interest):
NBBO = .90–1.05 in a non-penny stock
(.05 MPV).
BX BBO = .90–1.05(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each (Market
Maker A arrived first); Market
Maker A quote is .90–1.04(30)
which is displayed at 1.05 due to
this being a non-penny symbol and
Market Maker B quote is .90–
1.05(30). Both Market Maker A and
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Market Maker B have Priority status
since quotes are displayed at NBBO
price of 1.05.
PRISM Order to buy 90 contracts
stopped at 1.05 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each
respond to sell 10 contracts at 1.02, and
Market Maker D responds to sell 10
contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades
10 at 1.01 since he was only interest
offered at best price; Market Maker A
and Market Maker B each trade 10
contracts at 1.02 since they have priority
status for up to 30 contracts; Market
Maker D then trades 10 contracts at
1.02; Market Maker A then executes his
quote of 30 contracts at 1.04. PRISM
Contra trades 50% or 10 contracts at the
stop price of 1.05 since only one Market
Maker at 1.05. Market Maker B then
trades the remaining 10 contracts at
1.05.
The outcome of this example is the
same in both Pro-Rata or Price/Time
allocation models.
EXAMPLE #19 (Related to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price/
Time symbol with Initiating Participant
utilizing Surrender and no responders):
BX BBO = .95–1.03(60) with Market
Maker A and Market Maker B
offering 30 contracts each.
PRISM Order to buy 20 contracts
stopped at 1.02 marked as
‘Surrender’ is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C
quotes .95–1.02 for 10 contracts and BX
BBO becomes .95–1.02 for 10 contracts
and NBBO becomes .97–1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A
moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and joins the BX
BBO at .95–1.02 for 10 contracts and
NBBO remains .97–1.02.
Auction ends, Priority MM interest
trades first: Market Maker A gets
allocated 10 contracts of PRISM Order.
Non priority interest trades next: Market
Maker C gets allocated 10 contracts. The
PRISM contra executes no contracts.
Market Maker B receives no allocation
in this example.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 56 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 57
in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
56 15
57 15
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposal will result in increased
liquidity available at improved prices,
with competitive final pricing out of the
Initiating Participant’s complete control.
PRISM should promote and foster
competition and provide more options
contracts with the opportunity for price
improvement. As a result of the
increased opportunities for price
improvement, the Exchange believes
that participants will use PRISM to
increase the number of Public Customer
orders that are provided with the
opportunity to receive price
improvement over the NBBO.
The Exchange believes that the PRISM
auction will encourage BX Market
Makers to quote at the NBBO with
additional size and thereby result in
tighter and deeper markets, resulting in
more liquidity on BX. Specifically, by
offering BX Market Makers the ability to
receive priority in the proposed
allocation during the PRISM auction, a
BX Market Maker will be encouraged to
quote outside of the PRISM auction at
the their best and most aggressive prices
with additional size. BX believes that
this incentive may result in a narrowing
of quotes and thus further enhance BX’s
market quality. Within the PRISM
auction, BX believes that the rules that
are proposed will encourage BX Market
Makers to compete vigorously to
provide the opportunity for price
improvement in a competitive auction
process.
Further, the new functionality may
lead to an increase in Exchange volume
and should allow the Exchange to better
compete against other markets that
already offer an electronic solicitation
mechanism, while providing an
opportunity for price improvement for
agency orders. The Exchange believes
that its proposal will allow the
Exchange to better compete for solicited
transactions, while providing an
opportunity for price improvement for
agency orders and assuring that Public
Customers on the book are protected.
The new solicitation mechanism should
promote and foster competition and
provide more options contracts with the
opportunity for price improvement,
which should benefit market
participants, investors, and traders. The
Exchange has proposed a range between
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
no less than one hundred milliseconds
and no more than one second for the
duration of the PRISM Auction;
therefore the proposed rule change will
provide investors with more timely
execution of their options orders than a
mechanism that has a one second
auction, while ensuring that there is an
adequate exposure of orders in BX
PRISM. The Exchange preliminary
expects to use a default of 100
milliseconds for all symbols. The time
will be announced in an Options Trader
Alert. The proposed auction response
time, no less than one hundred
milliseconds and no more than one
second, should allow investors the
opportunity to receive price
improvement through PRISM while
reducing market risk. The Exchange
believes a briefer time period reduces
the market risk for the Initiating
Participant, versus an auction with a
one second period, as well as for any
Participant providing orders in response
to a broadcast. As such, BX believes the
proposed rule change would help
perfect the mechanism for a free and
open national market system, and
generally help protect investors’ and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is not unfairly
discriminatory because the PRISM
duration would be the same for all
Participants and symbols. All
Participants will have an equal
opportunity to respond with their best
prices during the PRISM auction.
The Exchange believes using the
Price/Time allocation method for
interest remaining after proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(1) through
(3) have been satisfied provides
consistency with the underlying symbol
allocation designation. Since the
Exchange considers all interest present
in the System, and not solely auction
Responses, for execution against the
PRISM Order, those participants who
are not explicit responders to the
auction will expect executions based on
their Price/Time priority. In addition,
the Exchange believes executing such
remaining interest in a Price/Time
fashion does not unfairly advantage/
disadvantage one participant over
another since executions are done with
price priority first and time only
becoming a factor when considering
equally priced interest for execution.
Also, other exchanges utilize Price/Time
in their auctions today.58
58 ISE
executes Priority Customer interest in a
Price/Time fashion within its PIM auction. See ISE
Rule 723(d). Complex orders are also executed
within its auction in price time priority. See ISE
Rule 722. BOX also permits Price/Time priority
within PIP and COPIP. See BOX Rules 7150(f)(4)
and 7245(f)(3). See also example number 14 below.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54611
With respect to trading halts, as
described herein, in the case of a trading
halt on the Exchange in the affected
series, the stop price, in which case the
PRISM Order will be executed solely
against the Initiating Order. The
Exchange believes that executing the
stop price solely against the Initiating
Order promotes just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in facilitating transactions in securities
since the Initiating Member has
guaranteed that an execution will occur
at the stop price (or better) prior to the
trading halt, and PAN responses offer no
such guarantee, the stop price is the
only valid price at which to execute the
PRISM Order, and the Initiating Member
is the appropriate contra-side.59
With respect to rounding, the
Initiating Participant will be rounded up
or down to the nearest integer, all other
rounding is down to the nearest integer.
If rounding results in an allocation of
less than one contract, then one contract
will be allocated to the Initiating
Participant, only if the Initiating
Participant did not otherwise receive an
allocation. The Exchange believes that
rounding differently for the Initiating
Participant as compared to all other
market participants is not unfairly
discriminatory in that the Initiating
Participant is not eligible to receive
residual contracts as are other market
participants, unless no other interest is
available to trade. The Exchange is
permitting the Initiating Participant to
receive the benefit of the rounding in an
allocation of less than one contract, only
if the Initiating Participant did not
otherwise receive an allocation. because
the Initiating Participant is not eligible
to receive residual contracts.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 11(a) of the
Act 60 and Rule 11a2–2(T) 61 thereunder.
Section 11(a) prohibits a member of a
national securities exchange from
effecting transactions on the exchange
for its own account, the account of an
associated person, or an account in
which it or an associated person
exercises investment discretion, unless
an exception applies (collectively
‘‘Covered Accounts’’). Rule 11a2–2(T)
under the Act,62 known as the effect
versus execute’’ rule, provides exchange
members with an exemption from the
59 The Exchange notes that trading on the
Exchange in any option contract will be halted
whenever trading in the underlying security has
been paused or halted by the primary listing
market. See BX Rules at Chapter V, Section 3.
60 15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1).
61 17 CFR 240.11a2–2(T).
62 CFR 240.11a2–2(T).
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
54612
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section 11(a)(1) prohibition. Rule 11a2–
2(T) permits an exchange member,
subject to certain conditions, to effect
transactions for Covered Accounts by
arranging for an unaffiliated member to
execute transactions on the exchange.63
To comply with Rule 11a2–2(T)’s
conditions, a member: (i) Must transmit
the order from off the exchange floor;
(ii) may not participate in the execution
of the transaction once it has been
transmitted to the member performing
the execution; 64 (iii) may not be
affiliated with the executing member;
and (iv) with respect to an account over
which the member has investment
discretion, neither the member nor its
associated person may retain any
compensation in connection with
effecting the transaction except as
provided in the Rule. For the reasons set
forth below, the Exchange believes that
Exchange members entering orders into
PRISM would satisfy the requirements
of Rule 11a2–2(T).
The Exchange does not operate a
physical trading floor, rather the
Exchange operates an electronic market.
The Rule’s first condition is that orders
for Covered Accounts be transmitted
from off the exchange floor. In the
context of automated trading systems,
the Commission has found that the offfloor transmission requirement is met if
a Covered Account order is transmitted
from a remote location directly to an
exchange’s floor by electronic means.65
63 In enacting this provision, Congress was
concerned about members benefiting in their
principal transactions from special ‘‘time and
place’’ advantages associated with floor trading—
such as the ability to ‘‘execute decisions faster than
public investors.’’ The Commission, however, has
adopted a number of exceptions to the general
statutory prohibition for situations in which the
principal transactions contribute to the fairness and
orderliness of exchange markets or do not reflect
any time and place trading advantages. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 14563 (March
14, 1978), 43 FR 11542 (March 17, 1978); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 14713 (April 28, 1978),
43 FR 18557 (May 1, 1978); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 15533 (January 29, 1979), 44 FR 6093
(Jan. 31, 1979). The 1978 and 1979 Releases cite the
House Report at 54–57.
64 The member may, however, participate in
clearing and settling the transaction.
65 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
61419 (January 26, 2010), 75 FR 5157 (February 1,
2010) (SR–BATS–2009–031) (approving BATS
options trading); 59154 (December 23, 2008), 73 FR
80468 (December 31, 2008) (SR–BSE–2008–48)
(approving equity securities listing and trading on
BSE); 57478 (March 12, 2008), 73 FR 14521 (March
18, 2008) (SR–NASDAQ–2007–004 and SR–
NASDAQ–2007–080) (approving NOM options
trading); 53128 (January 13, 2006), 71 FR 3550
(January 23, 2006) (File No. 10–131) (approving The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC); 44983 (October 25,
2001), 66 FR 55225 (November 1, 2001) (SR–PCX–
00–25) (approving Archipelago Exchange); 29237
(May 24, 1991), 56 FR 24853 (May 31, 1991) (SR–
NYSE–90–52 and SR–NYSE–90–53) (approving
NYSE’s Off-Hours Trading Facility); and 15533
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
BX represents that the System and the
proposed PRISM auction receive all
orders electronically through remote
terminals or computer-to-computer
interfaces. The Exchange represents that
orders for Covered Accounts from
Participants will be transmitted from a
remote location directly to the proposed
PRISM mechanisms by electronic
means.
The second condition of Rule 11a2–
2(T) requires that neither a member nor
an associated person participate in the
execution of its order once the order is
transmitted to the floor for execution.
The Exchange represents that, upon
submission to the PRISM auction, an
order will be executed automatically
pursuant to the rules set forth for
PRISM. In particular, execution of an
order sent to the mechanism depends
not on the Initiating Participant entering
the order, but rather on what other
orders are present and the priority of
those orders. Thus, at no time following
the submission of an order is a
Participant able to acquire control or
influence over the result or timing of
order execution.66 Once the PRISM
Order has been transmitted, the
Exchange Initiating Member that
transmitted the order will not
participate in the execution of the
PRISM Order. Initiating Members
submitting PRISM Orders will
relinquish control of their PRISM
Orders upon transmission to the
Exchange’s System. Further, no
Participant, including the Initiating
Participant, will see a PAN response
submitted into PRISM and therefore and
will not be able to influence or guide the
execution of their PRISM Orders.
Finally, the Surrender feature will not
permit a Participant to have any control
over an order. The election to Surrender
an order is available prior to the
submission of the order and therefore
could not be utilized to gain influence
or guide the execution of the PRISM
Order. The information provided with
respect to the Surrender feature by the
market participant will not be broadcast
(January 29, 1979), 44 FR 6084 (January 31, 1979)
(‘‘1979 Release’’).
66 The Exchange notes that a Participant may
cancel or modify an order, or modify the
instructions for executing an order, but that such
instructions would be transmitted from off the floor
of the Exchange. The Commission has stated that
the non-participation requirement is satisfied under
such circumstances so long as such modifications
or cancellations are also transmitted from off the
floor. See 1978 Release (stating that the ‘‘nonparticipation requirement does not prevent
initiating members from canceling or modifying
orders (or the instructions pursuant to which the
initiating member wishes to be executed) after the
orders have been transmitted to the executing
member, provided that any such instructions are
also transmitted from off the floor’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and further, the information may not be
modified by the market participant
during the auction.
Rule 11a2–2(T)’s third condition
requires that the order be executed by
an exchange member who is unaffiliated
with the member initiating the order.
The Commission has stated that the
requirement is satisfied when
automated exchange facilities, such as
the PRISM are used, as long as the
design of these systems ensures that
members do not possess any special or
unique trading advantages in handling
their orders after transmitting them to
the exchange.67 The Exchange
represents that the PRISM is designed so
that no Participant has any special or
unique trading advantage in the
handling of its orders after transmitting
its orders to the mechanism.
Rule 11a2–2(T)’s fourth condition
requires that, in the case of a transaction
effected for an account with respect to
which the initiating member or an
associated person thereof exercises
investment discretion, neither the
initiating member nor any associated
person thereof may retain any
compensation in connection with
effecting the transaction, unless the
person authorized to transact business
for the account has expressly provided
otherwise by written contract referring
to Section 11(a) of the Act and Rule
11a2–2(T) thereunder.68 The Exchange
recognizes that Participants relying on
Rule 11a2–2(T) for transactions effected
through the PRISM must comply with
this condition of the Rule and the
Exchange will enforce this requirement
67 In considering the operation of automated
execution systems operated by an exchange, the
Commission noted that, while there is not an
independent executing exchange member, the
execution of an order is automatic once it has been
transmitted into the system. Because the design of
these systems ensures that members do not possess
any special or unique trading advantages in
handling their orders after transmitting them to the
exchange, the Commission has stated that
executions obtained through these systems satisfy
the independent execution requirement of Rule
11a2–2(T). See 1979 Release.
68 See 17 CFR 240.11a2–2(T)(a)(2)(iv). In addition,
Rule 11a2–2(T)(d) requires a member or associated
person authorized by written contract to retain
compensation, in connection with effecting
transactions for Covered Accounts over which such
member or associated persons thereof exercises
investment discretion, to furnish at least annually
to the person authorized to transact business for the
account a statement setting forth the total amount
of compensation retained by the member in
connection with effecting transactions for the
account during the period covered by the statement
which amount must be exclusive of all amounts
paid to others during that period for services
rendered to effect such transactions. See also 1978
(stating ‘‘[t]he contractual and disclosure
requirements are designed to assure that accounts
electing to permit transaction-related compensation
do so only after deciding that such arrangements are
suitable to their interests’’).
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
pursuant to its obligations under
Section 6(b)(1) of the Act to enforce
compliance with federal securities laws.
The Exchange believes that the instant
proposal is consistent with Rule 11a2–
2(T), and that therefore the exception
should apply in this case.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule changes would further
the objectives of the Act to protect
investors by promoting the intermarket
price protection goals of the Options
Intermarket Linkage Plan.69 The
Exchange believes its proposal would
help ensure inter-market competition
across all exchanges and facilitate
compliance with best execution
practices. The Exchange believes that
these objectives are consistent with the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 11A of the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The competition among the options
exchanges is vigorous and this proposal
is intended to afford the BX Options
market the opportunity to compete for
order flow by offering an auction
mechanism on BX similar to that of
other exchanges.
With respect to intra-market
competition, the auction will be
available to all BX Participants.
Moreover, as explained above, the
proposal should encourage BX
Participants to compete amongst each
other by responding with their best
price and size for a particular auction.
With respect to overall market quality,
the Exchange believes that the PRISM
auction, as proposed herein, will
encourage BX Market Makers to quote at
the NBBO with additional size and
thereby result in tighter and deeper
markets, resulting in more liquidity.
Specifically, by offering BX Market
Makers the ability to receive priority in
the proposed allocation during the
PRISM auction, a BX Market Maker will
be encouraged to quote outside of the
PRISM auction at the their best and
most aggressive prices. BX believes that
this incentive may result in a narrowing
of quotes and thus further enhance BX’s
and overall market quality. Within the
PRISM auction, BX believes that the
rules that are proposed will encourage
BX Market Makers to compete
vigorously to provide the opportunity
69 See BX Rule at Chapter XII, Section 3 regarding
Locked and Crossed Markets.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
for price improvement in a competitive
auction process. The Exchange does not
believe that providing BX Market
Makers with an opportunity to receive
priority allocation will create an undue
burden on intra-market competition. BX
Market Makers have obligations to the
market unlike other market
participants.70 The allocation seeks to
reward BX Market Makers with an
opportunity to receive additional
allocations.
The Exchange’s proposal is a
competitive response to similar
provisions in the price improvement
auction rules of other options
exchanges.71 The Exchange believes this
proposed rule change is necessary to
permit fair competition among the
options exchanges and to establish more
uniform price improvement auction
rules on the various options exchanges.
The Exchange anticipates that this
auction proposal will create new
opportunities for BX to attract new
business and compete on equal footing
with those options exchanges with
auctions and for this reason the
proposal does not create an undue
burden on inter-market competition.
Rather, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule would bolster intermarket competition by promoting fair
competition among individual markets,
while at the same time assuring that
market participants receive the benefits
of markets that are linked together,
through facilities and rules, in a unified
system, which promotes interaction
among the orders of buyers and sellers.
The Exchange believes its proposal
would help ensure inter-market
competition across all exchanges and
facilitate compliance with best
execution practices. In addition, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change would help promote fair
and orderly markets by helping ensure
compliance with Options Order
Protection and Locked and Crossed
Market Rules.72 Thus, the Exchange
does not believe the proposal creates
any significant impact on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
70 See
BX Rules at Chapter VII, Section 6.
the following options markets offer
auctions: CBOE, ISE, BOX, MIAX and Phlx. See
CBOE Rule 6.74A, ISE Rule 723, BOX Rule 7150,
MIAX Rule 5.15 and Phlx Rule 1080(n).
72 See Chapter XII of BX Rules.
71 Today,
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54613
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission shall: (a) By order
approve or disapprove such proposed
rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BX–2015–032 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2015–032. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed
rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
54614
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2015–032 and should
be submitted on or before October 1,
2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.73
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–22742 Filed 9–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–75832; File No. SR–BATS–
2015–69]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Rules 1.5(r), 11.1(a), 11.23, 14.6, 14.11,
and 14.12 and Adopt Rule 11.1(a)(1)
September 3, 2015.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 1, 2015, BATS Exchange,
Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend the definition of Pre-Opening
Session under Rule 1.5(r) to state that
the Pre-Opening Session will start at
7:00 a.m. rather than 8:00 a.m. Eastern
Time, Rule 11.1(a) to account for the
Pre-Opening Session starting at 7:00
a.m. Eastern Time, and to make related
changes to Rules 11.23, 14.6, 14.11, and
14.12. The Exchange also proposes to
adopt new Rule 11.1(a)(1) to define
Effective Start Time, which would be an
order instruction enabling Members 3
73 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The term ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any
registered broker or dealer that has been admitted
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Sep 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
[sic] indicate a time upon which their
order may become eligible for
execution.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
definition of Pre-Opening Session under
Rule 1.5(r) to state that the Pre-Opening
Session will start at 7:00 a.m. rather
than 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time, Rule
11.1(a) to account for the Pre-Opening
Session starting at 7:00 a.m. Eastern
Time, and to make related changes to
Rules 11.23, 14.6, 14.11, and 14.12. The
Exchange also proposes to adopt new
Rule 11.1(a)(1) to define Effective Start
Time, which would be an order
instruction enabling Members indicate a
time upon which their order may
become eligible for execution.
Pre-Opening Session 7:00 a.m. Start
The Exchange trading day is currently
divided into two sessions: (i) The PreOpening Session which starts at 8:00
a.m. and ends at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time;
and (ii) the Regular Trading Hours
which runs from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Eastern Time. The Exchange proposes to
amend the definition of ‘‘Pre-Opening
Session’’ under Rule 1.5(r) to state that
the Pre-Opening Session will start at
to membership in the Exchange. A Member will
have the status of a ‘‘member’’ of the Exchange as
that term is defined in Section 3(a)(3) of the Act.
Membership may be granted to a sole proprietor,
partnership, corporation, limited liability company
or other organization which is a registered broker
or dealer pursuant to Section 15 of the Act, and
which has been approved by the Exchange.’’ See
Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7:00 a.m. rather than 8:00 a.m. Eastern
Time.4
The Exchange also proposes to amend
Rule 11.1(a) to account for the PreOpening Session starting at 7:00 a.m.
Eastern Time. Other than the proposal
to change the start of the Pre-Opening
Session from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.
Eastern Time discussed above, the
Exchange does not propose to amend
the substance or operation of Rule
11.1(a).
As amended, orders entered between
6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. Eastern Time,
rather than 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.
Eastern Time, would not eligible for
execution until the start of the PreOpening Session or Regular Trading
Hours,5 depending on the Time-in-Force
(‘‘TIF’’) 6 selected by the User.7 Rule
11.1(a) will also be amended to state
that the Exchange will not accept the
following orders prior to 7:00 a.m.
Eastern Time, rather than 8:00 a.m.:
BATS Post Only Orders,8 Partial Post
Only at Limit Orders,9 Intermarket
Sweep Orders (‘‘ISOs’’),10 BATS Market
Orders 11 with a TIF other than Regular
Hours Only,12 Minimum Quantity
Orders 13 that also include a TIF of
Regular Hours Only, and all orders with
a TIF instruction of Immediate-orCancel (‘‘IOC’’) 14 or Fill-or-Kill
(‘‘FOK’’).15 At the commencement of the
Pre-Opening Session, orders entered
between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. Eastern
Time, rather than 6:00 a.m. and 8:00
a.m. Eastern Time, will be handled in
time sequence, beginning with the order
with the oldest time stamp, and will be
placed on the BATS Book,16 routed,
4 The Exchange notes that NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’) operates an Opening Session that
starts at 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time (1:00 a.m. Pacific
Time) and ends at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time (6:30 a.m.
Pacific Time). See NYSE Arca Rule 7.34(a)(1). The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’) operates a
pre-market session that also opens at 4:00 a.m. and
ends at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. See Nasdaq Rule
4701(g). See also Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 69151 (March 15, 2013), 78 FR 17464 (March
21, 2013) (SR–Nasdaq–2013–033) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change to Extend the Pre-Market Hours of the
Exchange to 4:00 a.m. EST).
5 ‘‘Regular Trading Hours’’ is defined as ‘‘the time
between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.’’ See
Exchange Rule 1.5(w).
6 The Times-In-Force instructions available on the
Exchange are set forth under Exchange Rule 11.9(b).
7 ‘‘User’’ is defined as ‘‘any Member or Sponsored
Participant who is authorized to obtain access to the
System pursuant to Rule 11.3.’’ See Exchange Rule
1.5(cc).
8 See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(6).
9 See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(7).
10 See Exchange Rule 11.9(d).
11 See Exchange Rule 11.9(a)(2).
12 See Exchange Rule 11.9(b)(7).
13 See Exchange Rule 11.9(c)(5).
14 See Exchange Rule 11.9(b)(1).
15 See Exchange Rule 11.9(b)(6).
16 See Exchange Rule 1.5(e).
E:\FR\FM\10SEN1.SGM
10SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 175 (Thursday, September 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54601-54614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-22742]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-75827; File No. SR-BX-2015-032]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Establish
a New Auction, BX PRISM
September 3, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 19, 2015, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. On September 2, 2015,
the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ BX filed Amendment No. 1 to correct an inadvertent rule text
error in Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(6) by removing stray brackets.
Also, BX filed this amendment to conform rule text in Chapter VI,
Section 9(ii)(K) to the language in the proposed 19b4 for clarity
and consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend BX rules at Chapter VI, Section 9,
which is currently reserved, to establish a price-improvement mechanism
on BX.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to establish a price-
improvement mechanism, ``PRISM,'' on the Exchange, which includes auto-
match functionality in which a Participant (an ``Initiating
Participant'') may electronically submit for execution an order it
represents as agent on behalf of a Public Customer,\4\ Professional
customer, broker dealer, or any other entity (``PRISM Order'') against
principal interest or against any other order it represents as agent
(an ``Initiating Order'') provided it submits the PRISM Order for
electronic execution into the PRISM Auction (``Auction'') pursuant to
the proposed Rule.\5\ The Exchange intends to retitle Chapter VI,
Section 9, which is currently reserved, as ``Price Improvement Auction
(``PRISM'').'' The Exchange believes that the PRISM auction, as
proposed herein, will encourage BX Market Makers to quote at the NBBO
with additional size and thereby result in tighter and deeper markets,
resulting in more liquidity on BX. Specifically, by offering BX Market
Makers the ability to receive priority in the proposed allocation
during the PRISM auction up to the size of their quote, a BX Market
Maker will be encouraged to quote with additional size outside of the
PRISM auction at the best and most aggressive prices. BX believes that
this incentive may result in a narrowing of quotes and thus further
enhance BX's market quality. Within the PRISM auction, BX believes that
the rules that are proposed will encourage BX Market Makers to compete
vigorously to provide the opportunity for price improvement in a
competitive auction process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For purposes of this Rule, a Public Customer order does not
include a Professional order, and therefore a Professional would not
be entitled to Public Customer priority as described herein. A
Public Customer means a person that is not a broker or dealer in
securities. See BX Options Rules at Chapter I, Section 1(a)(50). A
Public Customer order does not include a Professional order for
purposes of BX Rule at Chapter VI, Section 10(a)(C)(1)(a), which
governs allocation priority. A ``Professional'' means any person or
entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii)
places more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average
during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). A
Participant or a Public Customer may, without limitation, be a
Professional. All Professional orders shall be appropriately marked
by Participants. See BX Rules at Chapter I, Section 1(a)(49).
\5\ BX will only conduct an auction for Simple Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction Eligibility Requirements
All options traded on the Exchange are eligible for PRISM. Proposed
Rule Chapter VI, Section 9(i) describes the circumstances under which
an Initiating Participant may initiate an Auction. The Initiating
Participant may initiate an Auction provided the conditions which
follow are met: If the PRISM Order is for the account of a Public
Customer the Initiating Participant must stop the entire PRISM Order at
a price that is equal to or better than the National Best Bid/Offer
displayed (``NBBO'') on the opposite side of the market from the PRISM
Order, provided that such price must be at least one minimum trading
increment specified in Chapter VI, Section 5 \6\ better than any limit
order
[[Page 54602]]
on the limit order book on the same side of the market as the PRISM
Order.\7\ If the PRISM Order is for the account of a broker dealer or
any other person or entity that is not a Public Customer, the
Initiating Participant must stop the entire PRISM at a price that is
the better of: (i) The displayed BX BBO price improved by at least the
minimum trading increment on the same side of the market as the PRISM
Order, or (ii) the PRISM Order's limit price (if the order is a limit
order), provided in either case that such price is at or better than
the displayed NBBO.\8\ There is a distinction between proposed Chapter
VI, Section 9(i)(A) and Section 9(i)(B) in that a PRISM Order that is a
Public Customer Order must trade at an improved price if there is a
limit order on the book. A PRISM Order that is for a non-Customer
(account of a broker-dealer or any other person or entity that is not a
Public Customer) is always required to improve the same side of the BX
BBO even if there is no resting limit order on the book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Board may establish minimum quoting increments for
options contracts traded on BX Options. The minimum trading
increment for options contracts traded on BX Options will be one (1)
cent for all series (``Minimum Increment''). See BX Rules at Chapter
VI, Section 5(b).
\7\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(A).
\8\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRISM Orders that do not comply with these aforementioned
requirements are not eligible to initiate an Auction and will be
rejected. Also, PRISM Orders submitted at or before the opening of
trading are not eligible to initiate an Auction and will be rejected.
PRISM Orders submitted during the final two seconds of the trading
session in the affected series are not eligible to initiate an Auction
and will be rejected. Finally, an Initiating Order may not be a
solicited order for the account of any BX Options Market Maker assigned
in the affected series.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(i)(C) through
(G).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auction Process
Only one Auction may be conducted at a time in any given series.
Once commenced, an Auction may not be cancelled and would proceed as
described herein. To initiate the Auction, the Initiating Participant
must mark the PRISM Order for Auction processing, and specify either:
(a) A single price at which it seeks to execute the PRISM Order (a
``stop price''); (b) that it is willing to automatically match as
principal or as agent on behalf of an Initiating Order the price and
size of all PRISM Auction Notifications (``PAN'') responses, and
trading interest (``auto-match'') in which case the PRISM Order will be
stopped at the NBBO on the Initiating Order side; \10\ or (c) that it
is willing to either: (i) Stop the entire order at a single stop price
and auto-match PAN responses and trading interest at a price or prices
that improve the stop price to a specified price (a ``No Worse Than''
or ``NWT'' price); (ii) stop the entire order at a single stop price
and auto-match all PAN responses and trading interest at or better than
the stop price; or (iii) stop the entire order at the NBBO on the
Initiating Order side, and auto-match PAN responses and trading
interest at a price or prices that improve the stop price up to the NWT
price. In all cases, if the BX BBO on the same side of the market as
the PRISM Order represents a limit order on the book, the stop price
must be at least the Minimum Increment better than the booked limit
order's limit price. Once the Initiating Participant has submitted a
PRISM Order for processing as described herein, such PRISM Order may
not be modified or cancelled. Under no circumstances will the
Initiating Participant receive an allocation percentage of more than
50% with one competing order or 40% with multiple competing orders at
the final price point, except for rounding, when competing orders have
contracts available for execution.\11\ Under any of the circumstances
described above, the stop price or NWT price may be improved to the
benefit of the PRISM Order during the Auction, but may not be
cancelled. When starting an Auction, the Initiating Participant may
submit the Initiating Order with a designation of ``surrender'' to
other PRISM Participants (``Surrender''), which will result in the
Initiating Participant forfeiting priority and trade allocation
privileges.\12\ If Surrender is specified the Initiating Order will
only trade if there is not enough interest available to fully execute
the PRISM Order at prices which are equal to or improve upon the stop
price.\13\ The Surrender function will never result in more than the
maximum allowable allocation percentage to the Initiating Participant
than that which the Initiating Participant would have otherwise
received in accordance with the allocation procedures set forth in this
Rule.\14\ Surrender information will not be available to other market
participants and may not be modified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ This is accomplished by marking the Initiating Order with a
market (MKT) price.
\11\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1).
\12\ The Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated's
(``CBOE'') has a process whereby initiating participants may elect
to receive last priority in an allocation. See CBOE Rule
6.74A(b)(3)(J) (Automated Improvement Mechanism (``AIM'')). See also
MIAX Rule 5.15(A)(a)(2)(iii)(J). BX will allow surrender only for
the entire amount, not for a partial amount.
\13\ Surrender will not be applied if both the Initiating Order
and PRISM Order are Public Customer Orders.
\14\ This concept of Surrender is similar to a forfeiture
concept on the BOX Options Exchange LLC (``BOX''). See BOX Rule
7150(g) regarding PIP, its price improvement auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
When the Exchange receives a PRISM Order for Auction processing, a
PAN detailing the side, size and options series of the PRISM Order will
be sent over the Exchange's Specialized Quote Feed (``SQF'').\15\ The
Auction will last for a period of time, as determined by the Exchange
and announced on the Nasdaq Trader Web site. The Auction period will be
no less than one hundred milliseconds \16\ and no more than one
second.\17\ Any person or entity may submit a response to the PAN,
provided such response is properly marked specifying price, size and
side of the market. PAN responses will not be visible to Auction
participants, including the initiator, and will not be disseminated to
OPRA. The minimum price increment for PAN responses and for an
Initiating Participant's stop price and/or NWT price would be the
minimum price improvement increment established pursuant to proposed
rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1).\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ SQF is available to Market Makers at no cost. The Depth
Feed is available to all other market participants that pay to
subscribe to the service to receive broadcast information regarding
auctions.
\16\ BOX's PIP auction is a duration of one hundred
milliseconds, commencing on the dissemination of the PIP broadcast.
See BOX Rule 7150(f)(1).
\17\ CBOE's AIM auction is a duration of one second. See CBOE
Rule 6.74A(b)(1)(C).
\18\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(2)
through (6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'') staff distributed a survey to all
Phlx market maker firms inquiring as to the timeframe within which
these market participants respond to an auction with a duration time
ranging from less than fifty (50) milliseconds to more than one (1)
second. The market marker firms on Phlx represent membership similar to
BX Market Makers.\19\ An overwhelming number of the market maker firms
that responded to the survey indicated that they were capable of
responding to auctions with a duration time of at least 50
milliseconds.\20\ Based on the results of the survey, the Exchange
believes that allowing for an auction period of no less than one
hundred (100) milliseconds
[[Page 54603]]
and no more than one (1) second would provide a meaningful opportunity
for BX Participants to respond to the PRISM Auction while at the same
time facilitating the prompt execution of orders. The Exchange believes
that BX Participants will have sufficient time to ensure competition
for PRISM Orders, and could provide orders within the PRISM auction
additional opportunities for price improvement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Ninety (90) percent of the BX Market Maker firms
participated in the survey.
\20\ Of the thirty five (35) Phlx market maker firms that were
surveyed, twenty (20) of these market makers responded to the survey
and of those respondents 100% indicated that that their firm could
respond to auctions with a duration time of at least 50
milliseconds. This survey was conducted in May 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX believes the proposed rule change could provide orders within
PRISM an opportunity for price improvement. Also, the shorter duration
of time for the auction reduce the market risk for all Participants
executing trades in PRISM. Initiating Participants are required to
guarantee an execution at the NBBO or at a better price, and are
subject to market risk while their PRISM Order is exposed to other BX
Participants. While other Participants are also subject to market risk,
those providing responses in PRISM may cancel or modify their orders.
BX believes that the Initiating Participant acts in a critical role
within the PRISM auction. Their willingness to guarantee the orders
entered into PRISM an execution at NBBO or a better price is the
keystone to an order gaining the opportunity for price improvement. BX
believes that allowing for an auction period of no less than one
hundred milliseconds and no more than one second will benefit
Participants trading in PRISM. BX believes it is in these Participants'
best interests to minimize the auction time while continuing to allow
Participants adequate time to electronically respond. Both the order
being exposed and the responding orders are subject to market risk
during the auction.
While some Participants may wait to respond until later in the
auction, presumably to minimize their market risk, the Exchange
believes that a majority of the orders would respond earlier in the
auction. Based on experience with the Phlx's PIXL mechanism on BX's
affiliated exchange, BX believes that 100 milliseconds will continue to
provide all market participants with sufficient time to respond,
compete, and provide price improvement for orders and will provide
investors and other market participants with more timely executions,
thereby reducing their market risk. The proposed rule allows people to
respond quickly at the most favorable price while reducing the risk
that the market will move against the response.
BX believes that its Participants operate electronic systems that
enable them to react and respond to orders in a meaningful way in
fractions of a second. BX believes that its Participants will be able
to compete within 100 milliseconds and this is a sufficient amount of
time to respond to, compete for, and provide price improvement for
orders, and will provide investors and other market participants with
more timely executions, and reduce their market risk.
Finally, with respect to the impact of this proposal, more
specifically the timing of the responses proposed herein, on System
\21\ capacity, BX has analyzed its capacity and represents that it and
the Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') have the necessary
systems capacity to handle the potential additional traffic associated
with auction transactions resulting specifically from the
implementation of the auction period of no less than one hundred
milliseconds and no more than one second. Additionally, in terms of
overall capacity the Exchange represents that its Systems will be able
to sufficiently maintain an audit trail for order and trade information
with the PRISM auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The term ``System'' is defined in BX Rules at Chapter VI,
Section 1(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A PAN response size at any given price point may not exceed the
size of the PRISM Order. A PAN response with a size greater than the
size of the PRISM Order will be rejected. A PAN response must be equal
to or better than the NBBO at the time of receipt of the PAN response.
PAN responses may be modified or cancelled during the Auction.\22\ A
PAN response submitted with a price that is outside the displayed NBBO
will be rejected. PAN responses on the same side of the market as the
PRISM Order are considered invalid and will be rejected. Finally,
multiple PAN responses from the same Participant may be submitted
during the Auction. Multiple orders at a particular price point
submitted by a Participant in response to a PAN may not exceed, in the
aggregate, the size of the PRISM Order.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ The modification and cancellation of a PAN response will be
similar to the manner in which a cancel-replace order would be
handled outside of the auction process. See BX Rules at Chapter VI,
Section 1(e)(1).
\23\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(7)
through (10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion of an Auction
The PRISM Auction would conclude at the earlier of the end of the
Auction period, any time the BX BBO crosses the PRISM Order stop price
on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order \24\ or any time
there is a trading halt \25\ on the Exchange in the affected
series.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ This provision regarding the BX BBO crossing the PRISM
Order stop price on the same side of the market as the PRISM Order,
as a conclusion to a PRISM Auction, shall be effective subject to a
pilot period scheduled to expire July 18, 2016, as proposed.
\25\ This provision regarding the trading halt, as a conclusion
to a PRISM Auction, shall be effective subject to a pilot period
scheduled to expire July 18, 2016, as proposed.
\26\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Auction concludes at the earlier of the BX BBO crossing the
PRISM Order stop price on the same side of the market as the PRISM
Order or any time there is a trading halt on the Exchange in the
affected series, the entire PRISM Order will be executed as follows:
(1) In the case of the BX BBO crossing the PRISM Order stop price, the
best response price(s) or, if the stop price is the best price in the
Auction, at the stop price, unless the best response price is equal to
or better than the price of a limit order resting on the Order Book on
the same side of the market as the PRISM Order, in which case the PRISM
Order will be executed against that response, but at a price that is at
the minimum trading increment better than the price of such limit order
at the time of the conclusion of the Auction; or (2) in the case of a
trading halt on the Exchange in the affected series, the stop price, in
which case the PRISM Order will be executed solely against the
Initiating Order. In the event of a trading halt, since the Initiating
Participant has guaranteed that an execution will occur at the stop
price (or better), and PAN responses offer no such guarantee, the stop
price is the only valid price at which to execute the PRISM Order, and
the Initiating Member is the appropriate contra-side.
Any unexecuted PAN responses will be cancelled.\27\ An unrelated
market or marketable limit order (against the BX BBO) on the opposite
side of the market from the PRISM Order received during the Auction
will not cause the Auction to end early and will execute against
interest outside of the Auction.\28\ If contracts remain from such
unrelated order at the time the auction ends, they will be considered
for participation in the order allocation process.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(C). The
Exchange will not route away any orders to another market center
submitted into the PRISM auction.
\28\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(D).
\29\ This provision shall be effective for a pilot period
scheduled to expire on July 18, 2016, as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Allocation--Size Pro-Rata
At the conclusion of the Auction, the PRISM Order will be allocated
at the best price(s) as follows for underlying symbols which are
designated as Size
[[Page 54604]]
Pro-Rata, as described in Chapter VI, Section10(1)(C)(1)(a) with
priority as is described below. First, Public Customer orders would
have time priority at each price level. Next, the Initiating
Participant would be allocated after Public Customer Orders.
If the Initiating Participant selected the single stop price option
of the PRISM Auction, PRISM executions will occur at prices that
improve the stop price, and then at the stop price with up to 40% of
the remaining contracts after Public Customer interest is satisfied
being allocated to the Initiating Participant the stop price. However,
if only one other Participant matches the stop price, then the
Initiating Participant may be allocated up to 50% of the contracts
executed at such price. Remaining contracts would be allocated,
pursuant to proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(3) through (5), among
remaining quotes, orders and PAN responses at the stop price.
Thereafter, remaining contracts, if any, would be allocated to the
Initiating Participant. The allocation will account for Surrender, if
applicable.
If the Initiating Participant selected the auto-match option of the
PRISM Auction the Initiating Participant would be allocated an equal
number of contracts as the aggregate size of all other quotes, orders
and PAN responses at each price point until a price point is reached
where the balance of the order can be fully executed, except that the
Initiating Participant would be entitled to receive up to 40% of the
contracts remaining at the final price point (including situations
where the stop price is the final price) after Public Customer interest
has been satisfied but before remaining interest. If there are other
quotes, orders and PAN responses at the final price point the contracts
will be allocated to such interest pursuant to proposed Chapter VI,
Section 9(ii)(E)(3) through (5). Any remaining contracts would be
allocated to the Initiating Participant.
In the case of a PRISM, if the Initiating Participant selected the
``stop and NWT'' option of the PRISM Auction, contracts would be
allocated as follows: (i) First to quotes, orders and PAN responses at
prices better than the NWT price (if any), beginning with the best
price, pursuant to proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(3) through
(5), at each price point; and (ii) next, to quotes, orders and PAN
responses at prices at the Initiating Participant's NWT price and
better than the Initiating Participant's stop price, beginning with the
NWT price. The Initiating Participant would be allocated an equal
number of contracts as the aggregate size of all other quotes, orders
and PAN responses at each price point, except that the Initiating
Participant would be entitled to receive up to 40% (multiple competing
orders) or 50% (one competing order) of the contracts remaining at the
final price point (including situations where the final price is the
stop price), after Public Customer interest has been satisfied but
before remaining interest. In the case of an Initiating Order with a
NWT price at the market, the Initiating Participant would be allocated
an equal number of contracts as the aggregate size of all other quotes,
orders and PAN responses at all price points, except that the
Initiating Participant would be entitled to receive up to 40% of the
contracts remaining at the final price point (including situations
where the final price is the stop price), after Public Customer
interest has been satisfied but before remaining interest. If there are
other quotes, orders and PAN responses at the final price point the
contracts will be allocated to such interest pursuant to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(3) through (5). Any remaining contracts
would be allocated to the Initiating Participant.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(2)(a)
through (c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next, BX Options Market Makers that were at a price that is equal
to or better \31\ than the displayed NBBO on the opposite side of the
market from the PRISM Order at the time of initiation of the PRISM
Auction (``Priority Market Makers'') would have priority up to their
displayed quote size in the NBBO which was present when the PRISM
Auction was initiated (``Initial Displayed NBBO'') at each price level
at or better than such Initial Displayed NBBO after Public Customer and
Initiating Participants have received allocations.\32\ Priority Market
Maker quotes, orders, and PAN responses will be allocated pursuant to
the Size Pro-Rata algorithm set forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter VI,
Section 10(1)(B).\33\ Priority Market Maker status is only valid for
the duration of the particular PRISM auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Price Improving Orders are submitted to the System at price
increments smaller than the displayed Minimum Price Variation and
are displayed as part of the BX BBO at the Minimum Price Variation.
See BX Rules at Chapter VI, Section 1(e)(6). Price Improving
interest from a BX Market Maker will be considered as Priority
Market Maker interest provided the BX BBO is equal to the NBBO.
\32\ MIAX allocates executions resulting from Priority Public
Customer interest and priority Market Maker quotes ahead of other
interest. MIAX's system may designate Market Maker quotes as either
priority quotes or non-priority quotes in accordance with the
provisions in MIAX Rule 517(b). The Exchange is prioritizing
Priority Market Maker allocations in the proposed BX PRISM Auction
in a similar manner, ahead of other non- Public Customer interest.
\33\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next, Non-Priority Market Makers and Priority Market Maker interest
which exceeded their displayed size in the Initial Displayed NBBO would
have priority at each price level at or better than the Initial
Displayed NBBO after Public Customer, Initiating Participants and
Priority Market Makers have received allocations. Non-Priority Market
Maker and Priority Market Maker interest which exceeded their displayed
size in the Initial Displayed NBBO will be allocated pursuant to the
Size Pro-Rata algorithm set forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter VI,
Section 10(1)(B).\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, all other interest will be allocated, after proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(1) through (4) have been satisfied. Such
interest will be allocated pursuant to the Size Pro-Rata algorithm set
forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(B).\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Allocation--Price/Time
At the conclusion of the Auction, the PRISM Order will be allocated
at the best price(s) as indicated below for underlying symbols
designated as Price/Time as described in proposed Chapter VI,
Section10(1)(C)(2)(i). First, Public Customer orders would have time
priority at each price level. Next, the Initiating Participant would be
allocated after Public Customer Orders.
If the Initiating Participant selected the single stop price option
of the PRISM Auction, PRISM executions will occur at prices that
improve the stop price, and then at the stop price with up to 40% of
the remaining contracts after Public Customer interest is satisfied
being allocated to the Initiating Participant the stop price. However,
if only one other Participant matches the stop price, then the
Initiating Participant may be allocated up to 50% of the contracts
executed at such price. Remaining contracts would be allocated pursuant
to proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(3) and (4), among remaining
quotes, orders and PAN responses at the stop price. Thereafter,
remaining contracts, if any, would be allocated to the Initiating
Participant. The allocation will account for Surrender, if applicable.
If the Initiating Participant selected the auto-match option of the
PRISM Auction the Initiating Participant would be allocated an equal
number of
[[Page 54605]]
contracts as the aggregate size of all other quotes, orders and PAN
responses at each price point until a price point is reached where the
balance of the order can be fully executed, except that the Initiating
Participant would be entitled to receive up to 40% or 50% of the
contracts remaining at the final price point (including situations
where the stop price is the final price), after Public Customer
interest has been satisfied but before remaining interest. If there are
other quotes, orders and PAN responses at the final price point the
contracts will be allocated to such interest pursuant to proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(3) and (4). Any remaining contracts would
be allocated to the Initiating Participant. In the case of a PRISM, if
the Initiating Participant selected the ``stop and NWT'' option of the
PRISM Auction, contracts would be allocated as follows: (i) First to
quotes, orders and PAN responses at prices better than the NWT price
(if any), beginning with the best price, pursuant to proposed Chapter
VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(3) and (4), at each price point; and (ii) next, to
quotes, orders and PAN responses at prices at the Initiating
Participant's NWT price and better than the Initiating Participant's
stop price, beginning with the NWT price. The Initiating Participant
would be allocated an equal number of contracts as the aggregate size
of all other quotes, orders and PAN responses at each price point,
except that the Initiating Participant would be entitled to receive up
to 40% of the contracts remaining at the final price point (including
situations where the final price is the stop price), after Public
Customer interest has been satisfied but before remaining interest. In
the case of an Initiating Order with a NWT price at the market, the
Initiating Participant would be allocated an equal number of contracts
as the aggregate size of all other quotes, orders and PAN responses at
all price points, except that the Initiating Participant would be
entitled to receive up to 40% of the contracts remaining at the final
price point (including situations where the final price is the stop
price), after Public Customer interest has been satisfied but before
remaining interest. If there are other quotes, orders and PAN responses
at the final price point the contracts will be allocated to such
interest pursuant to proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(3) and (4).
Any remaining contracts would be allocated to the Initiating
Participant.
Next, Priority Market Makers that were at a price that is equal to
or better than the displayed NBBO on the opposite side of the market
from the PRISM Order at the time of initiation of PRISM Auction would
have priority up to their displayed quote size in the Initial Displayed
NBBO at each price level better than the Initial Displayed NBBO, after
Public Customer and Initiating Participants have received allocations.
Priority Market Maker interest at prices better than the Initial
Displayed NBBO will be allocated pursuant to the Size Pro-Rata
algorithm set forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(B).
Priority Market Maker interest at a price equal to or inferior to the
Initial Displayed NBBO will not have priority over other participants
and will be allocated pursuant to the Price/Time algorithm set forth in
Exchange Rules at Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(A).\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, all other interest will be allocated, after proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(1) through (3) have been satisfied. Such
interest will be allocated pursuant to the Price/Time algorithm set
forth in Exchange Rules at Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(A).\37\ The
Exchange believes using the Price/Time allocation method for interest
remaining after proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(1) through (3)
have been satisfied provides consistency with the underlying symbol
allocation designation. Since the Exchange considers all interest
present in the System, and not solely auction Responses, for execution
against the PRISM Order, those participants who are not explicit
responders to the auction will expect executions based on their Price/
Time priority. In addition, the Exchange believes executing such
remaining interest in a Price/Time fashion does not unfairly advantage/
disadvantage one participant over another since executions are done
with price priority first and time only becoming a factor when
considering equally priced interest for execution.\38\ Other options
markets utilize Price/Time in auctions.\39\ With respect to either
allocation method, Size Pro-Rata or Price/Time, a single quote, order
or PAN response would not be allocated a number of contracts that is
greater than its size. Residual odd lots will be allocated in time-
priority among interest with the highest priority. Rounding of the
Initiating Participant will be up or down to the nearest integer,\40\
all other rounding is down to the nearest integer. If rounding results
in an allocation of less than one contract, then one contract will be
allocated to the Initiating Participant only if the Initiating
Participant did not otherwise receive an allocation.\41\ The Initiating
Participant is not eligible to receive residual contracts if already
allocated, unless no other interest is available to trade. If there are
PAN responses that cross the then-existing NBBO (provided such NBBO is
not crossed), such PAN responses will be executed, if possible, at
their limit price(s). If the price of the PRISM Auction is the same as
that of an order on the limit order book on the same side of the market
as the PRISM Order, the PRISM Order may only be executed at a price
that is at least one minimum trading increment better than the resting
order's limit price or, if such resting order's limit price is equal to
or crosses the stop price, then the entire PRISM Order will trade at
the stop price with all better priced interest being considered for
execution at the stop price. Any unexecuted PAN responses will be
cancelled.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(4).
\38\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(F)(2)(a)
through (c).
\39\ The International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'')
executes Priority Customer interest in a Price/Time fashion within
its PIM auction. See ISE Rule 723. Complex orders are also executed
within its auction in price time priority. See ISE Rule 722. BOX
also permits Price/Time priority within PIP and COPIP. See BOX Rules
7150(g) and 7245(g). See also example number 14 below.
\40\ When the decimal is exactly 0.5, the rounding direction is
up to the nearest integer.
\41\ Similar rounding exists for BX's Direct Market Maker and
Lead Market Maker. See BX Rules at Chapter VI, Section 10.
\42\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(G)-(J).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to Intermarket Sweep Orders or ``ISO'' Orders,\43\
under any allocation, if a PRISM Auction is initiated for an order
designated as an ISO Order, all executions which are at a price
inferior to the Initial Displayed NBBO would be allocated pursuant to
the Size Pro-Rata execution algorithm, as described in Chapter VI,
Section 10(1)(C)(1)(a), or Price/Time execution algorithm, as described
in Chapter VI, Section 10(1)(C)(2)(i), and the aforementioned priority
in proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E) and (F) would not apply, with
the exception of allocating to the Initiating Participant, which will
be allocated in accordance with the priority as specified in proposed
Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)
[[Page 54606]]
and (F).\44\ Specifically, a PRISM ISO is the transmission of two
orders for crossing without regard for better priced Protected Bids or
Protected Offers because the Participant transmitting the PRISM ISO to
the Exchange has, simultaneously with the routing of the PRISM ISO,
routed one or more ISOs, as necessary, to execute against the full
displayed size of any Protected Bid or Protected Offer that is superior
to the starting PRISM Auction price and has swept all interest in the
Exchange's book priced better than the proposed PRISM Auction starting
price. The Exchange will accept a PRISM ISO provided the order adheres
to the PRISM Order acceptance requirements, but without regard to the
NBBO. The Exchange will execute the PRISM ISO in the same manner as
other PRISM Orders, except that it will not protect prices away.
Instead, order flow providers will bear the responsibility to clear all
better priced interest away simultaneously with submitting the PRISM
ISO Order. There is no other impact to PRISM functionality.
Specifically, liquidity present at the end of the PRISM Auction will
continue to be included in the PRISM Auction as it is with PRISM Orders
not marked as ISOs. This order type is offered by other options
exchanges.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ An ``Intermarket Sweep Order'' or ``ISO'' are limit orders
that are designated as ISOs in the manner prescribed by BX and are
executed within the System by Participants at multiple price levels
without respect to Protected Quotations of other Eligible Exchanges
as defined in BX Rules at Chapter XII, Section 1. ISOs may have any
time-in-force designation except WAIT, are handled within the System
pursuant to BX Rules at Chapter VI, Section 10 and would not be
eligible for routing as set out in BX Rules at Chapter VI, Section
11. ISOs with a time-in-force designation of GTC are treated as
having a time-in-force designation of Day. See BX Options Rules at
Chapter VI, Section 1(e)(7).
\44\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(K).
\45\ See NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC Rules at 1080(n). PIXL ISO Orders
are permissible. See also CBOE Rule 6.53(q).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to Post Only Orders resting on the book at the time
the PRISM Auction is initiated,\46\ these orders will be executed if
such order would not result in the removal of liquidity when executing
in the PRISM Auction, in accordance with Chapter VI, Section 1(e)(10).
A Post Only Order will be cancelled if it is eligible for an execution
in the PRISM Auction and would be considered the remover of
liquidity.\47\ Post Only Orders submitted by a Marker Maker during a
PRISM Auction will not be considered as Priority Market Maker interest
\48\ but will be considered pursuant to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(E)(4) and Section 9(ii)(F)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ ``Post-Only Orders'' are orders that will not remove
liquidity from the System. Post- Only Orders are to be ranked and
executed on the Exchange or cancelled, as appropriate, without
routing away to another market. Post-Only Orders are evaluated at
the time of entry with respect to locking or crossing other orders
as follows: (i) If a Post-Only Order would lock or cross an order on
the System, the order will be re-priced to $.01 below the current
low offer (for bids) or above the current best bid (for offers) and
displayed by the System at one minimum price increment below the
current low offer (for bids) or above the current best bid (for
offers); and (ii) if a Post-Only Order would not lock or cross an
order on the System but would lock or cross the NBBO as reflected in
the protected quotation of another market center, the order will be
handled pursuant to Chapter VI, Section 7(b)(3)(C). Participants may
choose to have their Post-Only Orders returned whenever the order
would lock or cross the NBBO or be placed on the book at a price
other than its limit price. Post-Only Orders received prior to the
opening cross or after market close will be rejected. Post-Only
Orders may not have a time-in-force designation of Good Til
Cancelled or Immediate or Cancel. See BX Options Rules at Chapter
VI, Section 1(e)(10).
\47\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(L).
\48\ Only Market Maker interest submitted through SQF will be
eligible for Priority Market Maker interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Concerns--Bona Fide Transactions
The PRISM Auction may be used only where there is a genuine
intention to execute a bona fide transaction. It will be considered a
violation of this Rule and will be deemed conduct inconsistent with
just and equitable principles of trade and a violation of Rule 2110 if
an Initiating Participant submits a PRISM Order (initiating an Auction)
and also submits its own PAN response in the same Auction.\49\ A
pattern or practice of submitting multiple orders in response to a PAN
at a particular price point that exceed, in the aggregate, the size of
the PRISM Order, will be deemed conduct inconsistent with just and
equitable principles of trade and a violation of Rule 2110.\50\ A
pattern or practice of submitting unrelated orders or quotes that cross
the stop price, causing a PRISM Auction to conclude before the end of
the PRISM Auction period will be deemed conduct inconsistent with just
and equitable principles of trade and a violation of Rule 2110. It will
also be deemed conduct inconsistent with just and equitable principles
of trade and a violation of Rule 2110 to engage in a pattern of conduct
where the Initiating Participant breaks up a PRISM Order into separate
orders for the purpose of gaining a higher allocation percentage than
the Initiating Participant would have otherwise received in accordance
with the allocation procedures contained in proposed subparagraph
(ii)(E) and (ii)(F) to Chapter VI, Section 9.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(iii). BX Rule
2110 states that, ``A member, in the conduct of its business, shall
observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable
principles of trade.''
\50\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(iv).
\51\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crossing and Agency Orders
In lieu of the procedures in proposed paragraphs (i)-(ii) to
Chapter VI, Section 9, an Initiating Participant may enter a PRISM
Order for the account of a Public Customer paired with an order for the
account of a Public Customer and such paired orders will be
automatically executed without a PRISM Auction. The execution price for
such a PRISM Order must be expressed in the quoting increment
applicable to the affected series. Such an execution may not trade
through the NBBO or at the same price as any resting Public Customer
order.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 9(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BX Rules at Chapter VII, Section 12 \53\ prevents a Participant
from executing agency orders to increase its economic gain from trading
against the order without first giving other trading interests on the
Exchange an opportunity to either trade with the agency order or to
trade at the execution price when the Participant was already bidding
or offering on the book. However, the Exchange recognizes that it may
be possible for a Participant to establish a relationship with a Public
Customer or other person to deny agency orders the opportunity to
interact on the Exchange and to realize similar economic benefits as it
would achieve by executing agency orders as principal. It would be a
violation of BX Rules at Chapter VII, Section 12 for a Participant to
circumvent Chapter VII, Section 12 by providing an opportunity for (i)
a Public Customer affiliated with the Participant, or (ii) a Public
Customer with whom the Participant has an arrangement that allows the
Participant to realize similar economic benefits from the transaction
as the Participant would achieve by executing agency orders as
principal, to regularly execute against agency orders handled by the
firm immediately upon their entry as PRISM Public Customer-to-Public
Customer immediate crosses.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\53\ BX Rules at Chapter VI, Section 12, entitled ``Anonymity''
provides, ``The transaction reports produced by the System will
indicate the details of the transactions, and would not reveal
contra party identities. BX would reveal a Participant's identity in
the following circumstances: (1) When a registered clearing agency
ceases to act for a participant, or the Participant's clearing firm,
and the registered clearing agency determines not to guarantee the
settlement of the Participant's trades; (2) for regulatory purposes
or to comply with an order of an arbitrator or court; (3) if both
Participants to the transaction consent; and (4) unless otherwise
instructed by a member, BX will reveal to a member, no later than
the end of the day on the date an anonymous trade was executed, when
the member's order has been decremented by another order submitted
by that same member.
\54\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(vi)(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pilot Program Information to the Commission
Subject to a Pilot expiring July 18, 2016, there will be no minimum
size requirement for orders to be eligible for the Auction. During this
Pilot Period,
[[Page 54607]]
the Exchange will submit certain data, periodically as required by the
Commission, to provide supporting evidence that, among other things,
there is meaningful competition for all size orders, there are
opportunities for significant price improvement for orders executed
through PRISM and that there is an active and liquid market functioning
on the Exchange outside of the Auction mechanism. Any raw data which is
submitted to the Commission will be provided on a confidential
basis.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\55\ See proposed rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(vii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange represents that, in support of its proposed pilot
program, it proposes three components on a pilot basis: (1) Auction
eligibility requirements; (2) the early conclusion of the PRISM
Auction; and (3) no minimum size requirement of orders. the Exchange
will provide the following additional information on a monthly basis:
(1) The number of contracts (of orders of 50 contracts or greater)
entered into the PRISM;
(2) The number of contracts (of orders of fewer than 50 contracts)
entered into the PRISM;
(3) The number of orders of 50 contracts or greater entered into
the PRISM; and
(4) The number of orders of fewer than 50 contracts entered into
the PRISM.
Implementation
If the Commission approves this proposed rule change, as amended,
the Exchange anticipates that it will deploy PRISM within 45 days of
approval. Members will be notified of the deployment date by way of an
Options Trader Alert posted on the Exchange's Web site.
Examples of PRISM Order Executions
EXAMPLE #1 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a))
(PRISM Contra & Priority Market Maker interest fully satisfies PRISM
order for Pro-Rata or Price/Time):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03 (60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts stopped at 1.02 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 20 at 1.02 and
Market Maker A and Market Maker B each respond to sell 30 contracts at
1.02.
Auction ends, PRISM contra is allocated 40 contracts at 1.02 (40%
carve out); Market Maker A and Market Maker B each trade 30 contracts
since they are Priority Market Makers for 30 contracts. Market Maker C
does zero.
The outcome in this example is the same regardless of the
underlying symbol being designated as Pro-Rata or Price/Time.
EXAMPLE #2 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a))
(Pro-Rata among Priority Market Maker interest):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts stopped at 1.02 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond to sell 30 contracts at 1.02,
and Market Maker D responds to sell 10 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 since he was only
interest offered at best price, PRISM contra is allocated 36 contracts
at 1.02 (40% carve out); Market Maker A and Market Maker B each trade
27 contracts (pro rata among Priority Market Makers A and B). Market
Maker D does zero since there were no contracts open after Priority
Market Maker A and Priority Market Maker B were filled at that price.
EXAMPLE #3 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a))
(Price/Time symbol with contracts trading at improving prices and at
the initial NBBO price):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each (Market Maker A arrived first)
PRISM Order to buy 90 contracts stopped at 1.03 is received
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond to sell 10 contracts at 1.02,
and Market Maker D responds to sell 10 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 since he was only
interest offered at best price; Market Maker A and Market Maker B each
trade 10 contracts at 1.02 since they have priority status for up to 30
contracts; Market Maker D then trades 10 contracts at 1.02; PRISM
Contra trades 40% or 20 contracts at the stop price of 1.03. Assuming
Market Maker A was at the BX BBO of 1.03 before Market Maker B, Market
Maker A would execute 30 contracts at 1.03. Market Maker B would not
trade any at 1.03 since the order is filled before getting to his quote
in a price time fashion.
EXAMPLE #4 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(A)(1)(a))
(Pro-Rata symbol with Market Makers receiving both priority status and
non-priority status based on their size at initial NBBO):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 90 contracts stopped at 1.03 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond to sell 50 contracts at 1.02
(priority status for 30 contracts each and non-priority status for 20
contracts each), and Market Maker D responds to sell 50 contracts at
1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 since he was only
interest offered at best price; Market Maker A and Market Maker B each
trade 30 contracts at 1.02 since they have priority up to their size at
the NBBO when the auction started; Market Maker A, Market Maker B, and
Market Maker D then pro-rata split the balance of 20 contracts at 1.02
based on their remaining interest size with Market Maker A being
allocated 4 contracts (=20/90*20), Market Maker B being allocated 4
(=20/90*20) contracts, and Market Maker D being allocated 11 contracts
(=50/90*20) and the residual 1 contract being allocated to one of the 3
MMs (Market Maker A) in time priority.
EXAMPLE #5 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Initiating Order utilizes Auto-Match specifying the
No Worse Than (NWT) feature for Pro-Rata or Price/Time):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 90 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.02 is
received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond to sell 50 contracts at 1.02
(priority status for 30 contracts each and non-priority status for 20
contracts each), and Market Maker D responds to sell 50 contracts at
1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 since he was only
interest offered at best price; PRISM Contra is allocated 40% or 32
contracts at 1.02 since it will be the final price point, Market Maker
A and Market Maker B
[[Page 54608]]
each trade 24 contracts at 1.02 since they have priority ahead of
Market Maker D up to their size at the NBBO when the auction started.
The outcome in this example is the same regardless of Pro-Rata or
Price/Time designation.
EXAMPLE #6 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Pro-Rata Symbol with Market Makers receiving both
priority status and non-priority status based on their size at initial
NBBO and Initiating Order utilizes NWT feature):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03 (60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.02 is
received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond to sell 50 contracts at 1.02,
and Market Maker D responds to sell 50 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 since he was only
interest offered at best price; PRISM Contra is allocated 40% or 56
contracts at 1.02 since it will be the final price point; Market Maker
A and Market Maker B each trade 30 contracts at 1.02 since they have
priority up to their size at the NBBO when the auction started; Market
Maker A, Market Maker B, and Market Maker D then pro-rata split the
balance with Market Maker A and Market Maker B each trading 5
additional contracts at 1.02 (20/90*24) and Market Maker D trading 13
contracts at 1.02 (50/90*24). The residual 1 contract will be allocated
among the three MM (Market Maker A) in time priority.
EXAMPLE #7 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Price/Time symbol with Market Makers receiving both
priority status and non-priority status based on their size at initial
NBBO, Initiating Order utilizes NWT feature, and quotes move during
Auction):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.01 is
received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond in that time order (A before B)
to sell 50 contracts at 1.02 (30 of the 50 contracts are considered as
Priority Market Maker interest), and Market Maker D responds to sell 50
contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote and BX BBO becomes
.95-1.02 for 30 contracts and NBBO becomes .97-1.02. Market Maker A
maintains his Priority Market Maker status.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra
matches and trades 10 at 1.01 based on his NWT price of 1.01; PRISM
Contra is allocated 40% or 52 contracts at 1.02 since it will be the
final price point; Market Maker A and Market Maker B each trade 30
contracts at 1.02 since they have priority up to their size at the NBBO
when the auction started (since Market Maker A has both a response and
quote interest, Market Maker A's 30 contracts are allocated in a time
fashion among Market Maker A's interest at 1.02 with each of the
responses trading all 30 contracts); the residual 18 contracts are
traded in a Price/Time fashion at 1.02 among residual Market Maker
interest with Market Maker A response trading all 18 contracts.
EXAMPLE #8 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Pro Rata symbol with Market Makers receiving both
priority status and non-priority status based on their size at initial
NBBO and Initiating Order utilizes NWT feature):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03 with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering 30
contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.01 is
received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond in that order to sell 50
contracts at 1.02 (30 of the 50 contracts will be considered as
Priority Market Maker), and Market Maker D responds to sell 50
contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra
matches and trades 10 at 1.01; PRISM Contra is allocated 40% or 52
contracts at 1.02 since it will be the final price point; remaining
allocation is in Pro-Rata fashion with priority Market Maker interest
trading ahead of non-Priority Market Maker interest, Market Maker A and
Market Maker B each trade 30 contracts as Priority Market Maker then
Market Maker A, Market Maker B, and Market Maker D Pro Rata split the
balance with Market Maker A and Market Maker B each trading 4 contracts
at 1.02 (20/90 *18) and Market Maker D trading 10 contracts at 1.02
(50/90*18).
EXAMPLE #9 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Price/Time symbol with Market Makers receiving both
priority status and non-priority status based on their size at initial
NBBO, Initiating Order utilizes NWT feature, and quotes move during
Auction and Public Customer Order received):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.01 is
received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond in that order to sell 50
contracts at 1.02 (30 of the 50 contracts are considered as Priority
Market Maker), and Market Maker D responds to sell 50 contracts at
1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote (but maintains
Priority Market Maker status) and BX BBO becomes .95-1.02 for 30
contracts and NBBO becomes .97-1.02. Then, a Public Customer order is
received on the opposite side of the PRISM Order, offering 10 contracts
at 1.02 which does not cause an early auction termination.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra
matches and trades 10 at 1.01; Public Customer order then trades 10
contracts at 1.02. After Public Customer is satisfied, PRISM Contra is
allocated 40% of remaining which equates to 48 contracts; Priority
Market Maker interest is then traded with Market Maker A trading 30
contracts at 1.02 (all allocated to response since first in time
priority of Market Maker A interest at 1.02) and Market Maker B
response trading 30 contracts at 1.02. The residual 12 contracts are
allocated among remaining Market Maker interest at 1.02 in a Price/Time
fashion, with Market Maker A response trading all 12 contracts.
EXAMPLE #10 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Price/Time symbol with Market Makers receiving both
priority status and non-priority status based on their size at initial
NBBO, Initiating Order utilizes NWT feature, and Priority Market Maker
quote moves during Auction and maintains priority status and Public
Customer Order received):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 150 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.01 is
received.
[[Page 54609]]
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A responds to sell 10 contracts at 1.02 (considered as Priority
Market Maker), Market Maker B responds to sell 50 contracts at 1.02 (30
of the 50 contracts are considered as Priority Market Maker), and
Market Maker D responds to sell 50 contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO becomes .95-1.02 for 10 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97-1.02.
Then, a Public Customer order is received offering 10 contracts at
1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra
matches and trades 10 at 1.01; Public Customer order then trades 10
contracts at 1.02. After Public Customer is satisfied, PRISM Contra is
allocated 40% of remaining which equates to 48 contracts; Priority
Market Maker interest is then traded with Market Maker A trading 20
contracts at 1.02 (all of his interest, response and quote, since it is
less than the 30 he is entitled to as a priority Market Maker) and
Market Maker B response trades 30 contracts at 1.02. The remaining 22
contracts are allocated in price time fashion among remaining Market
Maker interest at 1.02 with Market Maker B response trading 20
contracts and Market Maker D response trading 2 contracts.
EXAMPLE #11 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price/Time symbol with all executions occurring at
initial NBBO price):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03 (60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each arriving in that order
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts stopped at 1.03 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 20 at 1.03 and
Public Customer offers 2 contracts at 1.03.
Auction ends, Public Customer trades 2 contracts at 1.03 and PRISM
contra is allocated 40% of residual or 39 contracts at 1.03; remaining
allocation is purely Price/Time with Market Maker A trading 30
contracts and Market Maker B trading 29 contracts.
EXAMPLE #12 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Pro-Rata symbol with all executions occurring at
initial NBBO price and Public Customer order received):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03 (60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each arriving in that order
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts stopped at 1.03 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 20 at 1.03 and
Public Customer offers 2 contracts at 1.03.
Auction ends, Public Customer trades 2 contracts at 1.03 and PRISM
contra is allocated 40% of residual or 39 contracts at 1.03; remaining
allocation is pro-rata among Priority Market Maker interest with Market
Maker A trading 29 contracts (30/60*59), Market Maker B trading 29
contracts (30/60*59), and the residual 1 contract being allocated to
Market Maker A based on time.
EXAMPLE #13 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Price/Time symbol with Initiating Order specifying
Auto-Match with the NWT feature and non-Market Maker interest is
present for execution):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each (arriving in that order)
PRISM Order to buy 300 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.01 is
received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 5 at 1.01, Market
Maker A responds to sell 10 contracts at 1.02, Market Maker B responds
to sell 50 contracts at 1.02 (30 of the 50 contracts are considered as
Priority Market Maker), and Market Maker D responds to sell 40
contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote for 10 contracts at
1.02, now alone at that price, (maintains Priority Market Maker status)
and BX BBO becomes .95-1.02 for 10 contracts and a Firm order arrives
offering 10 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 5 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra
matches and trades 5 at 1.01; All 1.02 interest is then allocated as
follows: Priority Market Maker interest is fully allocated with Market
Maker A response trading 10, Market Maker B response trading 30, and
Market Maker A quote trading 10 at 1.02. Non-Priority MM is allocated
in Price/Time with Market Maker B trading an additional 20 contracts
and Market Maker D trading 40 contracts at 1.02. After all Market Maker
interest is satisfied, the Firm order is allocated its full size of 10
contracts at 1.02. The PRISM Contra order matches the full volume
trading at 1.02 (b/c of NWT price) which is 120 contracts. The
remaining 50 contracts are traded at 1.03 with the PRISM Contra trading
50% of remaining since only matching one other participant or 25
contracts. The other 25 contracts are traded in Price/Time fashion in
accordance with the underlying algorithm with Market Maker B trading
all 25 contracts at 1.03.
EXAMPLE #14 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Pro-Rata symbol with Initiating Order specifying
Auto-Match with the NWT feature, non-Market Maker interest is present
for execution, Priority Market Maker has multiple price levels of
interest, and executions occurring at initial NBBO price):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each (arriving in that order)
PRISM Order to buy 300 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.01 is
received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 5 at 1.01, Market
Maker A responds to sell 10 contracts at 1.02 (considered as Priority
Market Maker), Market Maker B responds to sell 50 contracts at 1.02 (30
of the 50 contracts are considered as Priority Market Maker), Market
Maker D responds to sell 40 contracts at 1.02, and Market Maker A
responds with 30 additional contracts at 1.03 (considered as Priority
Market Maker).
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote (maintain Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO becomes .95-1.02 for 10 contracts and a
Firm order arrives offering 10 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 5 at 1.01 and PRISM Contra
matches and trades 5 at 1.01; All 1.02 interest is then allocated as
follows: Priority Market Maker interest is fully allocated with Market
Maker A response trading 10, Market Maker B response trading 30, and
Market Maker A quote trading 10 at 1.02. Non-priority Market Maker is
allocated with Market Maker B trading an additional 20 contracts and
Market Maker D trading 40 contracts at 1.02. After all Market Maker
interest is satisfied, the Firm order is allocated its full size of 10
contracts at 1.02. The PRISM Contra order matches the full volume
trading at 1.02 (b/c of NWT price) which is 120 contracts. The
remaining 50 contracts are traded at 1.03 with the PRISM Contra trading
40% of remaining or 20 contracts. The other 30 contracts are traded in
a Pro-Rata fashion in accordance with the underlying algorithm with
Market Maker A and Market Maker B as Priority Market Maker each trading
15 contracts at 1.03.
[[Page 54610]]
EXAMPLE #15 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(c)(i)) (Price/Time symbol with Market Makers receiving both
priority status and non-priority status at multiple price levels based
on their size at initial NBBO):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03 (20) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
10 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 200 contracts stopped at 1.03 with an NWT of 1.01 is
received.
Auction begins.
During auction (in the following order), Market Maker C responds to
sell 10 at 1.01, Market Maker A responds to sell 40 at 1.01 (10 of 40
contracts is considered Priority Market Maker), Market Maker A and
Market Maker B each respond to sell 50 contracts at 1.02 (10 of 50
contracts is considered Priority Market Maker), and Market Maker D
responds to sell 50 contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO becomes .95-1.02 for 10 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97-1.02.
Then, a Public Customer order is received offering 10 contracts at
1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker A trades 10 contracts at 1.01 as a
priority MM, then Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 in price/time and
Market Maker A trades his additional 30 contracts at 1.01 which
outsized his priority status, and PRISM Contra matches and trades a
total of 50 at 1.01; Public Customer order of 10 contracts trades at
1.02 then PRISM Contra is allocated 40% of 90 or 36 contracts at 1.02.
The remaining 54 contracts are then allocated at 1.02 with Market Maker
A and Market Maker B trading 10 contracts each as priority Market Maker
and 34 contracts are then allocated in price/time to Market Maker A at
1.02.
EXAMPLE #16 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price/Time symbol with Initiating Participant
utilizing Surrender):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 20 contracts stopped at 1.03 marked as `Surrender'
is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 5 at 1.01, Market
Maker A responds to sell 5 contracts at 1.02, Market Maker B responds
to sell 20 contracts at 1.02, and Market Maker D responds to sell 20
contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO becomes .95-1.02 for 5 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97-1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 5 at 1.01; Priority Market
Maker interest trades the remaining 15 contracts in a Pro-Rata fashion:
Market Maker A executes 5 contracts (10/30*15) with all 5 being given
to the Market Maker A response since he was first in time order of
Market Maker A interest at 1.02 and Market Maker B response executes 10
contracts (20/30*15) at 1.02. The PRISM Contra executes no contracts.
EXAMPLE #17 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Pro-Rata symbol with Initiating Participant utilizing
Surrender):
NBBO = .97-1.03
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each
PRISM Order to buy 100 contracts stopped at 1.02 marked as `Surrender'
is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 5 at 1.01, Market
Maker A responds to sell 5 contracts at 1.02, Market Maker B responds
to sell 40 contracts at 1.02, and Market Maker D responds to sell 20
contracts at 1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and BX BBO becomes .95-1.02 for 5 contracts and
NBBO becomes .97-1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 5 at 1.01; Priority Market
Maker interest at 1.02 then trades with Market Maker A response
executing 5 contracts, Market Maker B response volume with Priority
status executes 30 contracts, and Market Maker A quote executes 5
contracts; Non Priority Market Maker interest at 1.02 then executes
with Market Maker B trading 10 contracts and Market Maker D trading 20
contracts. The PRISM Contra then executes the remaining 25 contracts at
1.02 since there is no other interest to satisfy the PRISM Order at a
price equal to or better than the stop price of 1.02.
EXAMPLE #18 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price Improving Orders counted as Priority Market
Maker interest):
NBBO = .90-1.05 in a non-penny stock (.05 MPV).
BX BBO = .90-1.05(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each (Market Maker A arrived first); Market Maker A quote
is .90-1.04(30) which is displayed at 1.05 due to this being a non-
penny symbol and Market Maker B quote is .90-1.05(30). Both Market
Maker A and Market Maker B have Priority status since quotes are
displayed at NBBO price of 1.05.
PRISM Order to buy 90 contracts stopped at 1.05 is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C responds to sell 10 at 1.01, Market
Maker A and Market Maker B each respond to sell 10 contracts at 1.02,
and Market Maker D responds to sell 10 contracts at 1.02.
Auction ends, Market Maker C trades 10 at 1.01 since he was only
interest offered at best price; Market Maker A and Market Maker B each
trade 10 contracts at 1.02 since they have priority status for up to 30
contracts; Market Maker D then trades 10 contracts at 1.02; Market
Maker A then executes his quote of 30 contracts at 1.04. PRISM Contra
trades 50% or 10 contracts at the stop price of 1.05 since only one
Market Maker at 1.05. Market Maker B then trades the remaining 10
contracts at 1.05.
The outcome of this example is the same in both Pro-Rata or Price/
Time allocation models.
EXAMPLE #19 (Related to proposed Chapter VI, Section
9(ii)(A)(1)(a)) (Price/Time symbol with Initiating Participant
utilizing Surrender and no responders):
BX BBO = .95-1.03(60) with Market Maker A and Market Maker B offering
30 contracts each.
PRISM Order to buy 20 contracts stopped at 1.02 marked as `Surrender'
is received.
Auction begins.
During auction, Market Maker C quotes .95-1.02 for 10 contracts and
BX BBO becomes .95-1.02 for 10 contracts and NBBO becomes .97-1.02.
During auction, Market Maker A moves his quote (maintains Priority
Market Maker status) and joins the BX BBO at .95-1.02 for 10 contracts
and NBBO remains .97-1.02.
Auction ends, Priority MM interest trades first: Market Maker A
gets allocated 10 contracts of PRISM Order. Non priority interest
trades next: Market Maker C gets allocated 10 contracts. The PRISM
contra executes no contracts. Market Maker B receives no allocation in
this example.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \56\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \57\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
[[Page 54611]]
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\57\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposal will result in increased
liquidity available at improved prices, with competitive final pricing
out of the Initiating Participant's complete control. PRISM should
promote and foster competition and provide more options contracts with
the opportunity for price improvement. As a result of the increased
opportunities for price improvement, the Exchange believes that
participants will use PRISM to increase the number of Public Customer
orders that are provided with the opportunity to receive price
improvement over the NBBO.
The Exchange believes that the PRISM auction will encourage BX
Market Makers to quote at the NBBO with additional size and thereby
result in tighter and deeper markets, resulting in more liquidity on
BX. Specifically, by offering BX Market Makers the ability to receive
priority in the proposed allocation during the PRISM auction, a BX
Market Maker will be encouraged to quote outside of the PRISM auction
at the their best and most aggressive prices with additional size. BX
believes that this incentive may result in a narrowing of quotes and
thus further enhance BX's market quality. Within the PRISM auction, BX
believes that the rules that are proposed will encourage BX Market
Makers to compete vigorously to provide the opportunity for price
improvement in a competitive auction process.
Further, the new functionality may lead to an increase in Exchange
volume and should allow the Exchange to better compete against other
markets that already offer an electronic solicitation mechanism, while
providing an opportunity for price improvement for agency orders. The
Exchange believes that its proposal will allow the Exchange to better
compete for solicited transactions, while providing an opportunity for
price improvement for agency orders and assuring that Public Customers
on the book are protected. The new solicitation mechanism should
promote and foster competition and provide more options contracts with
the opportunity for price improvement, which should benefit market
participants, investors, and traders. The Exchange has proposed a range
between no less than one hundred milliseconds and no more than one
second for the duration of the PRISM Auction; therefore the proposed
rule change will provide investors with more timely execution of their
options orders than a mechanism that has a one second auction, while
ensuring that there is an adequate exposure of orders in BX PRISM. The
Exchange preliminary expects to use a default of 100 milliseconds for
all symbols. The time will be announced in an Options Trader Alert. The
proposed auction response time, no less than one hundred milliseconds
and no more than one second, should allow investors the opportunity to
receive price improvement through PRISM while reducing market risk. The
Exchange believes a briefer time period reduces the market risk for the
Initiating Participant, versus an auction with a one second period, as
well as for any Participant providing orders in response to a
broadcast. As such, BX believes the proposed rule change would help
perfect the mechanism for a free and open national market system, and
generally help protect investors' and the public interest. The Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is not unfairly discriminatory
because the PRISM duration would be the same for all Participants and
symbols. All Participants will have an equal opportunity to respond
with their best prices during the PRISM auction.
The Exchange believes using the Price/Time allocation method for
interest remaining after proposed Chapter VI, Section 9(ii)(E)(1)
through (3) have been satisfied provides consistency with the
underlying symbol allocation designation. Since the Exchange considers
all interest present in the System, and not solely auction Responses,
for execution against the PRISM Order, those participants who are not
explicit responders to the auction will expect executions based on
their Price/Time priority. In addition, the Exchange believes executing
such remaining interest in a Price/Time fashion does not unfairly
advantage/disadvantage one participant over another since executions
are done with price priority first and time only becoming a factor when
considering equally priced interest for execution. Also, other
exchanges utilize Price/Time in their auctions today.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\58\ ISE executes Priority Customer interest in a Price/Time
fashion within its PIM auction. See ISE Rule 723(d). Complex orders
are also executed within its auction in price time priority. See ISE
Rule 722. BOX also permits Price/Time priority within PIP and COPIP.
See BOX Rules 7150(f)(4) and 7245(f)(3). See also example number 14
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to trading halts, as described herein, in the case of
a trading halt on the Exchange in the affected series, the stop price,
in which case the PRISM Order will be executed solely against the
Initiating Order. The Exchange believes that executing the stop price
solely against the Initiating Order promotes just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities since the
Initiating Member has guaranteed that an execution will occur at the
stop price (or better) prior to the trading halt, and PAN responses
offer no such guarantee, the stop price is the only valid price at
which to execute the PRISM Order, and the Initiating Member is the
appropriate contra-side.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ The Exchange notes that trading on the Exchange in any
option contract will be halted whenever trading in the underlying
security has been paused or halted by the primary listing market.
See BX Rules at Chapter V, Section 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to rounding, the Initiating Participant will be
rounded up or down to the nearest integer, all other rounding is down
to the nearest integer. If rounding results in an allocation of less
than one contract, then one contract will be allocated to the
Initiating Participant, only if the Initiating Participant did not
otherwise receive an allocation. The Exchange believes that rounding
differently for the Initiating Participant as compared to all other
market participants is not unfairly discriminatory in that the
Initiating Participant is not eligible to receive residual contracts as
are other market participants, unless no other interest is available to
trade. The Exchange is permitting the Initiating Participant to receive
the benefit of the rounding in an allocation of less than one contract,
only if the Initiating Participant did not otherwise receive an
allocation. because the Initiating Participant is not eligible to
receive residual contracts.
The Exchange further believes that the proposal is consistent with
the requirements of Section 11(a) of the Act \60\ and Rule 11a2-2(T)
\61\ thereunder. Section 11(a) prohibits a member of a national
securities exchange from effecting transactions on the exchange for its
own account, the account of an associated person, or an account in
which it or an associated person exercises investment discretion,
unless an exception applies (collectively ``Covered Accounts''). Rule
11a2-2(T) under the Act,\62\ known as the effect versus execute'' rule,
provides exchange members with an exemption from the
[[Page 54612]]
Section 11(a)(1) prohibition. Rule 11a2-2(T) permits an exchange
member, subject to certain conditions, to effect transactions for
Covered Accounts by arranging for an unaffiliated member to execute
transactions on the exchange.\63\ To comply with Rule 11a2-2(T)'s
conditions, a member: (i) Must transmit the order from off the exchange
floor; (ii) may not participate in the execution of the transaction
once it has been transmitted to the member performing the execution;
\64\ (iii) may not be affiliated with the executing member; and (iv)
with respect to an account over which the member has investment
discretion, neither the member nor its associated person may retain any
compensation in connection with effecting the transaction except as
provided in the Rule. For the reasons set forth below, the Exchange
believes that Exchange members entering orders into PRISM would satisfy
the requirements of Rule 11a2-2(T).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ 15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1).
\61\ 17 CFR 240.11a2-2(T).
\62\ CFR 240.11a2-2(T).
\63\ In enacting this provision, Congress was concerned about
members benefiting in their principal transactions from special
``time and place'' advantages associated with floor trading--such as
the ability to ``execute decisions faster than public investors.''
The Commission, however, has adopted a number of exceptions to the
general statutory prohibition for situations in which the principal
transactions contribute to the fairness and orderliness of exchange
markets or do not reflect any time and place trading advantages. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 14563 (March 14, 1978), 43 FR
11542 (March 17, 1978); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 14713
(April 28, 1978), 43 FR 18557 (May 1, 1978); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 15533 (January 29, 1979), 44 FR 6093 (Jan. 31, 1979).
The 1978 and 1979 Releases cite the House Report at 54-57.
\64\ The member may, however, participate in clearing and
settling the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not operate a physical trading floor, rather the
Exchange operates an electronic market. The Rule's first condition is
that orders for Covered Accounts be transmitted from off the exchange
floor. In the context of automated trading systems, the Commission has
found that the off-floor transmission requirement is met if a Covered
Account order is transmitted from a remote location directly to an
exchange's floor by electronic means.\65\ BX represents that the System
and the proposed PRISM auction receive all orders electronically
through remote terminals or computer-to-computer interfaces. The
Exchange represents that orders for Covered Accounts from Participants
will be transmitted from a remote location directly to the proposed
PRISM mechanisms by electronic means.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\65\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 61419
(January 26, 2010), 75 FR 5157 (February 1, 2010) (SR-BATS-2009-031)
(approving BATS options trading); 59154 (December 23, 2008), 73 FR
80468 (December 31, 2008) (SR-BSE-2008-48) (approving equity
securities listing and trading on BSE); 57478 (March 12, 2008), 73
FR 14521 (March 18, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2007-004 and SR-NASDAQ-2007-
080) (approving NOM options trading); 53128 (January 13, 2006), 71
FR 3550 (January 23, 2006) (File No. 10-131) (approving The Nasdaq
Stock Market LLC); 44983 (October 25, 2001), 66 FR 55225 (November
1, 2001) (SR-PCX-00-25) (approving Archipelago Exchange); 29237 (May
24, 1991), 56 FR 24853 (May 31, 1991) (SR-NYSE-90-52 and SR-NYSE-90-
53) (approving NYSE's Off-Hours Trading Facility); and 15533
(January 29, 1979), 44 FR 6084 (January 31, 1979) (``1979
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The second condition of Rule 11a2-2(T) requires that neither a
member nor an associated person participate in the execution of its
order once the order is transmitted to the floor for execution. The
Exchange represents that, upon submission to the PRISM auction, an
order will be executed automatically pursuant to the rules set forth
for PRISM. In particular, execution of an order sent to the mechanism
depends not on the Initiating Participant entering the order, but
rather on what other orders are present and the priority of those
orders. Thus, at no time following the submission of an order is a
Participant able to acquire control or influence over the result or
timing of order execution.\66\ Once the PRISM Order has been
transmitted, the Exchange Initiating Member that transmitted the order
will not participate in the execution of the PRISM Order. Initiating
Members submitting PRISM Orders will relinquish control of their PRISM
Orders upon transmission to the Exchange's System. Further, no
Participant, including the Initiating Participant, will see a PAN
response submitted into PRISM and therefore and will not be able to
influence or guide the execution of their PRISM Orders. Finally, the
Surrender feature will not permit a Participant to have any control
over an order. The election to Surrender an order is available prior to
the submission of the order and therefore could not be utilized to gain
influence or guide the execution of the PRISM Order. The information
provided with respect to the Surrender feature by the market
participant will not be broadcast and further, the information may not
be modified by the market participant during the auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\66\ The Exchange notes that a Participant may cancel or modify
an order, or modify the instructions for executing an order, but
that such instructions would be transmitted from off the floor of
the Exchange. The Commission has stated that the non-participation
requirement is satisfied under such circumstances so long as such
modifications or cancellations are also transmitted from off the
floor. See 1978 Release (stating that the ``non-participation
requirement does not prevent initiating members from canceling or
modifying orders (or the instructions pursuant to which the
initiating member wishes to be executed) after the orders have been
transmitted to the executing member, provided that any such
instructions are also transmitted from off the floor'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 11a2-2(T)'s third condition requires that the order be
executed by an exchange member who is unaffiliated with the member
initiating the order. The Commission has stated that the requirement is
satisfied when automated exchange facilities, such as the PRISM are
used, as long as the design of these systems ensures that members do
not possess any special or unique trading advantages in handling their
orders after transmitting them to the exchange.\67\ The Exchange
represents that the PRISM is designed so that no Participant has any
special or unique trading advantage in the handling of its orders after
transmitting its orders to the mechanism.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\67\ In considering the operation of automated execution systems
operated by an exchange, the Commission noted that, while there is
not an independent executing exchange member, the execution of an
order is automatic once it has been transmitted into the system.
Because the design of these systems ensures that members do not
possess any special or unique trading advantages in handling their
orders after transmitting them to the exchange, the Commission has
stated that executions obtained through these systems satisfy the
independent execution requirement of Rule 11a2-2(T). See 1979
Release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 11a2-2(T)'s fourth condition requires that, in the case of a
transaction effected for an account with respect to which the
initiating member or an associated person thereof exercises investment
discretion, neither the initiating member nor any associated person
thereof may retain any compensation in connection with effecting the
transaction, unless the person authorized to transact business for the
account has expressly provided otherwise by written contract referring
to Section 11(a) of the Act and Rule 11a2-2(T) thereunder.\68\ The
Exchange recognizes that Participants relying on Rule 11a2-2(T) for
transactions effected through the PRISM must comply with this condition
of the Rule and the Exchange will enforce this requirement
[[Page 54613]]
pursuant to its obligations under Section 6(b)(1) of the Act to enforce
compliance with federal securities laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\68\ See 17 CFR 240.11a2-2(T)(a)(2)(iv). In addition, Rule 11a2-
2(T)(d) requires a member or associated person authorized by written
contract to retain compensation, in connection with effecting
transactions for Covered Accounts over which such member or
associated persons thereof exercises investment discretion, to
furnish at least annually to the person authorized to transact
business for the account a statement setting forth the total amount
of compensation retained by the member in connection with effecting
transactions for the account during the period covered by the
statement which amount must be exclusive of all amounts paid to
others during that period for services rendered to effect such
transactions. See also 1978 (stating ``[t]he contractual and
disclosure requirements are designed to assure that accounts
electing to permit transaction-related compensation do so only after
deciding that such arrangements are suitable to their interests'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the instant proposal is consistent with
Rule 11a2-2(T), and that therefore the exception should apply in this
case.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule changes would
further the objectives of the Act to protect investors by promoting the
intermarket price protection goals of the Options Intermarket Linkage
Plan.\69\ The Exchange believes its proposal would help ensure inter-
market competition across all exchanges and facilitate compliance with
best execution practices. The Exchange believes that these objectives
are consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 11A of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\69\ See BX Rule at Chapter XII, Section 3 regarding Locked and
Crossed Markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. The competition among the options exchanges is vigorous and
this proposal is intended to afford the BX Options market the
opportunity to compete for order flow by offering an auction mechanism
on BX similar to that of other exchanges.
With respect to intra-market competition, the auction will be
available to all BX Participants. Moreover, as explained above, the
proposal should encourage BX Participants to compete amongst each other
by responding with their best price and size for a particular auction.
With respect to overall market quality, the Exchange believes that the
PRISM auction, as proposed herein, will encourage BX Market Makers to
quote at the NBBO with additional size and thereby result in tighter
and deeper markets, resulting in more liquidity. Specifically, by
offering BX Market Makers the ability to receive priority in the
proposed allocation during the PRISM auction, a BX Market Maker will be
encouraged to quote outside of the PRISM auction at the their best and
most aggressive prices. BX believes that this incentive may result in a
narrowing of quotes and thus further enhance BX's and overall market
quality. Within the PRISM auction, BX believes that the rules that are
proposed will encourage BX Market Makers to compete vigorously to
provide the opportunity for price improvement in a competitive auction
process. The Exchange does not believe that providing BX Market Makers
with an opportunity to receive priority allocation will create an undue
burden on intra-market competition. BX Market Makers have obligations
to the market unlike other market participants.\70\ The allocation
seeks to reward BX Market Makers with an opportunity to receive
additional allocations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\70\ See BX Rules at Chapter VII, Section 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal is a competitive response to similar
provisions in the price improvement auction rules of other options
exchanges.\71\ The Exchange believes this proposed rule change is
necessary to permit fair competition among the options exchanges and to
establish more uniform price improvement auction rules on the various
options exchanges. The Exchange anticipates that this auction proposal
will create new opportunities for BX to attract new business and
compete on equal footing with those options exchanges with auctions and
for this reason the proposal does not create an undue burden on inter-
market competition. Rather, the Exchange believes that the proposed
rule would bolster inter-market competition by promoting fair
competition among individual markets, while at the same time assuring
that market participants receive the benefits of markets that are
linked together, through facilities and rules, in a unified system,
which promotes interaction among the orders of buyers and sellers. The
Exchange believes its proposal would help ensure inter-market
competition across all exchanges and facilitate compliance with best
execution practices. In addition, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would help promote fair and orderly markets by
helping ensure compliance with Options Order Protection and Locked and
Crossed Market Rules.\72\ Thus, the Exchange does not believe the
proposal creates any significant impact on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\71\ Today, the following options markets offer auctions: CBOE,
ISE, BOX, MIAX and Phlx. See CBOE Rule 6.74A, ISE Rule 723, BOX Rule
7150, MIAX Rule 5.15 and Phlx Rule 1080(n).
\72\ See Chapter XII of BX Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2015-032 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2015-032. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal
[[Page 54614]]
office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2015-032 and
should be submitted on or before October 1, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\73\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\73\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-22742 Filed 9-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P