Certain Audio Processing Hardware and Software Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Intervenor Status to Conexant Systems Inc. and Waves Audio, Ltd., 53887-53888 [2015-22575]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 173 / Tuesday, September 8, 2015 / Notices decision on whether or not to close the breach. Actions addressing these issues will be designed and undertaken in support of the long-term protection, preservation, and restoration of Seashore resources. Information collected as part of the breach monitoring program will be utilized in the analysis of alternatives for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. A scoping newsletter will be prepared which identifies the issues and statements of purpose, need, and objectives identified to date during internal scoping meetings. Copies of that information and other updates may be obtained online at https:// parkplanning.nps.gov/fiis or at the address and phone numbers listed below. If you wish to comment on the purpose, need, objectives, or on any other issues associated with the plan, you may submit your comments via the Internet at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/ fiis and by mailing or hand-delivering comments to Fire Island National Seashore, Attn: Breach Management Plan, 120 Laurel St, Patchogue, NY 11772. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. The responsible official for this Draft Breach Management Plan/EIS is the Regional Director, NPS Northeast Region, U.S. Custom House, 200 Chestnut Street, Fifth Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Dated: August 31, 2015. Michael A. Caldwell, Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 2015–22560 Filed 9–4–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–WV–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement [S1D1 SS08011000SX064A000156S180110; S2D2SS08011000SX064A00015X501520] Notice of Proposed Information Collection; Request for Comments for 1029–0094 Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:18 Sep 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 Notice and request for comments. ACTION: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) is announcing its intention to seek the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval to continue the collection of information for our General provisions. This information collection activity was previously approved by OMB and assigned clearance number 1029–0094. DATES: Comments on the proposed information collection activity must be received by November 9, 2015, to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Submit comments to John Trelease, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 Constitution Ave, NW., Room 203–SIB, Washington, DC 20240. Comments may also be submitted electronically to jtrelease@osmre.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To receive a copy of the information collection request contact John Trelease, at (202) 208–2783 or via email at jtrelease@osmre.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which implement provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), require that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities [see 5 CFR 1320.8 (d)]. This notice identifies an information collection that OSMRE will be submitting to OMB for approval. This collection is contained in 30 CFR part 700—General. OSMRE will request a 3-year term of approval for this information collection activity. Responses are required to obtain a benefit. We may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Comments are invited on: (1) The need for the collection of information for the performance of the functions of the agency; (2) the accuracy of the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00129 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 53887 agency’s burden estimates; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to minimize the information collection burden on respondents, such as use of automated means of collection of the information. A summary of the public comments will accompany OSMRE’s submission of the information collection request to OMB. This notice provides the public with 60 days in which to comment on the following information collection activity: Title: 30 CFR part 700—General. OMB Control Number: 1029–0094. Summary: This Part establishes procedures and requirements for terminating jurisdiction of surface coal mining and reclamation operations, petitions for rulemaking, and citizen suits filed under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. Bureau Form Number: None. Frequency of Collection: Once. Description of Respondents: State and tribal regulatory authorities, private citizens and citizen groups, and surface coal mining companies. Total Annual Responses: 23. Total Annual Burden Hours: 80. Dated: September 1, 2015. John A. Trelease, Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. [FR Doc. 2015–22551 Filed 9–4–15;8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–949] Certain Audio Processing Hardware and Software Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Intervenor Status to Conexant Systems Inc. and Waves Audio, Ltd. U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 15) granting intervenor status to Conexant Systems Inc. and Waves Audio Ltd. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 53888 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 173 / Tuesday, September 8, 2015 / Notices investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 18, 2015, based on a complaint filed by Andrea Electronics Corp. of Bohemia, New York (‘‘Andrea’’). 80 FR 14159–60 (March 18, 2015). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation, sale for importation, and sale after importation of audio processing articles that infringe five U.S. patents. The notice of investigation named numerous respondents, some of whom have been previously terminated. The notice also named the Office of Unfair Import Investigations as a party. On July 2, 2015, Conexant Systems Inc. (‘‘Conexant’’) moved to obtain intervenor status in the investigation. Conexant argued that, because Andrea alleges that Conexant’s audio technology contained in the respondents’ products infringes the asserted patents, Conexant has an interest in the subject matter of the investigation. Conexant further argues that the respondents do not adequately represent Conexant’s interests because Andrea has accused the audio technology made by multiple companies, so the respondents may not necessarily have an interest in defending Conexant’s specific audio technology. On July 14, 2015, Andrea filed a response in opposition to the motion and the Commission Investigative Attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a response in support of the motion. On July 14, 2015, Waves Audio, Ltd. (‘‘Waves Audio’’) moved to obtain intervenor status in the investigation for substantially the same reasons as Conexant. Additionally, Waves Audio argued that it has indemnity obligations to the extent that its products are a part of the investigation. On July 20, 2015, Andrea filed a response in opposition to the motion and the IA filed a response in support of the motion. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:18 Sep 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 On August 7, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting intervenor status to Conexant and Waves Audio. The ALJ found that the motions complied with 19 CFR 210.19 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 because the motions were timely and showed that Conexant and Waves Audio had an interest in the subject matter of the investigation that was not adequately represented by the existing parties. No petitions for review of the subject ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 2, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015–22575 Filed 9–4–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–130 (Fourth Review)] Chloropicrin From China On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, that revocation of the antidumping duty order on chloropicrin from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review on April 1, 2015 (80 FR 17496) and determined on July 6, 2015 that it would conduct an expedited review (80 FR 43461, July 22, 2015). The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on August 20, 2015. The views of the 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). Frm 00130 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 By order of the Commission. Issued: September 1, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015–22061 Filed 9–4–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1070A (Second Review)] Crepe Paper From China Determination On the basis of the record1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, that revocation of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background Determination PO 00000 Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4561 (August 2015), entitled Chloropicrin from China: Investigation No. 731–TA–130 (Fourth Review). The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review on April 1, 2015 (80 FR 17499) and determined on July 6, 2015 that it would conduct an expedited review (80 FR 43118, July 21, 2015).2 The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on August 31, 2015. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4560 (August 2015), entitled Crepe Paper from China: Investigation No. 731–TA–1070A (Second Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 1, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015–22056 Filed 9–4–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Chairman Broadbent and Commissioner Kieff concluded that the respondent group response was inadequate, but that the circumstances warranted a full review. E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 173 (Tuesday, September 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53887-53888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-22575]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-949]


Certain Audio Processing Hardware and Software Products 
Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Granting Intervenor Status to Conexant Systems Inc. and 
Waves Audio, Ltd.

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 15) granting intervenor status to Conexant Systems 
Inc. and Waves Audio Ltd.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this

[[Page 53888]]

investigation are or will be available for inspection during official 
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 18, 2015, based on a complaint filed by Andrea Electronics 
Corp. of Bohemia, New York (``Andrea''). 80 FR 14159-60 (March 18, 
2015). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation, sale for 
importation, and sale after importation of audio processing articles 
that infringe five U.S. patents. The notice of investigation named 
numerous respondents, some of whom have been previously terminated. The 
notice also named the Office of Unfair Import Investigations as a 
party.
    On July 2, 2015, Conexant Systems Inc. (``Conexant'') moved to 
obtain intervenor status in the investigation. Conexant argued that, 
because Andrea alleges that Conexant's audio technology contained in 
the respondents' products infringes the asserted patents, Conexant has 
an interest in the subject matter of the investigation. Conexant 
further argues that the respondents do not adequately represent 
Conexant's interests because Andrea has accused the audio technology 
made by multiple companies, so the respondents may not necessarily have 
an interest in defending Conexant's specific audio technology. On July 
14, 2015, Andrea filed a response in opposition to the motion and the 
Commission Investigative Attorney (``IA'') filed a response in support 
of the motion.
    On July 14, 2015, Waves Audio, Ltd. (``Waves Audio'') moved to 
obtain intervenor status in the investigation for substantially the 
same reasons as Conexant. Additionally, Waves Audio argued that it has 
indemnity obligations to the extent that its products are a part of the 
investigation. On July 20, 2015, Andrea filed a response in opposition 
to the motion and the IA filed a response in support of the motion.
    On August 7, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting 
intervenor status to Conexant and Waves Audio. The ALJ found that the 
motions complied with 19 CFR 210.19 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 
24 because the motions were timely and showed that Conexant and Waves 
Audio had an interest in the subject matter of the investigation that 
was not adequately represented by the existing parties. No petitions 
for review of the subject ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 2, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-22575 Filed 9-4-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.