WTO Environmental Goods Trade Negotiations: Advice on the Probable Economic Effect of Providing Duty-Free Treatment, Second List of Articles, 53328-53330 [2015-21879]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
53328
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 171 / Thursday, September 3, 2015 / Notices
On April 27, 2015, the ALJ issued his
final initial determination on remand
(‘‘RID’’). The ALJ found that the accused
Nokia handsets meet the limitations
‘‘generated using a same code’’ and ‘‘the
message being transmitted only
subsequent to the subscriber unit
receiving the indication’’ recited in the
asserted claims of the ’966 and ’847
patents. The ALJ also found that the
pilot signal (P–CPICH) in the 3GPP
standard practiced by the accused Nokia
handsets satisfies the limitation
‘‘synchronize to the pilot signal’’ recited
in the asserted claim of the ’847 patent.
The ALJ further found that the currently
imported Nokia handsets, which
contain chips that were not previously
adjudicated, infringe the asserted claims
of the ’966 and ’847 patents. The ALJ
also found that there is no evidence of
patent hold-up by InterDigital, but that
there is evidence of reverse hold-up by
the respondents. The ALJ found that the
public interest does not preclude
issuance of an exclusion order. The ALJ
did not issue a Recommended
Determination on remedy or bonding.
On May 11, 2015, MMO and Nokia
Inc. (collectively, ‘‘MMO’’) filed a
petition for review of certain aspects of
the RID, including infringement,
domestic industry, and the public
interest. Also on May 11, 2015, Nokia
filed a petition for review of the RID
with respect to infringement, domestic
industry, and whether the Commission
has jurisdiction over Nokia following
the sale of its handset business to MMO.
Further on May 11, 2015, the
Commission investigative attorney
(‘‘IA’’) filed a petition for review of the
RID’s finding of infringement.
On May 19, 2015, InterDigital filed a
response to MMO’s and the IA’s
petitions for review. Also on May 19,
2015, MMO filed a response to the IA’s
petition for review. Further on May 19,
2015, the IA filed a response to MMO’s
and Nokia’s petitions for review.
On June 3, 2015, InterDigital filed a
statement on the public interest
pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(a)(4). Also on June 3, 2015,
several non-parties filed responses to
the Commission Notice issued on May
4, 2015, including: United States
Senator Robert Casey, Jr. of
Pennsylvania; Microsoft Corporation;
Intel Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc.,
Dell Inc., and Hewlett-Packard
Company; Innovation Alliance; and
Ericsson Inc. See 80 FR 26295–96 (May
7, 2015). On June 24, 2015, United
States Senator Patrick J. Toomey of
Pennsylvania also filed a response to the
Commission’s May 4, 2015, notice.
On June 25, 2015, the Commission
determined to review the RID in part. 80
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 Sep 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
FR 37656–658 (July 1, 2015).
Specifically, the Commission
determined to review the RID’s findings
concerning the application of the
Commission’s prior construction of the
claim limitation ‘‘successively
[transmits/transmitted] signals’’ in
Certain Wireless Devices with 3G
Capabilities and Components Thereof,
Inv. No. 337–TA–800 (‘‘the 800
investigation’’) and Certain Wireless
Devices with 3G and/or 4G Capabilities
and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337–
TA–868 (‘‘the 868 investigation’’). The
Commission also determined to review
the RID with respect to whether the
accused products satisfy the claim
limitation ‘‘successively [transmits/
transmitted] signals’’ as construed by
the Commission in the 800 and 868
investigations. The Commission further
determined to review the RID’s public
interest findings. 80 FR at 37657–658.
On July 10, 2015, InterDigital,
Respondents, and the IA submitted
initial briefs in response to the
Commission’s notice of review
concerning issues of violation, remedy,
bonding, and the public interest. On
July 20, 2015, the parties submitted
response briefs.
In response to the Commission’s
request for briefing on remedy, bonding,
and the public interest, the following
submitted briefing on July 10, 2015:
Edith Ramirez, Federal Trade
Commission Chairwoman; Ericsson Inc.;
and Intel Corporation, Dell Inc., and
Hewlett-Packard Company. On July 20,
2015, the following submitted
responsive briefing: Maureen K.
Ohlhausen and Joshua D. Wright,
Commissioners of the Federal Trade
Commission; and J. Gregory Sidak,
Chairman of Criterion Economics.
On July 20, 2015, Respondents filed a
motion to strike the declaration of Dr.
Jackson that InterDigital submitted as an
attachment to its response to the
Commission’s notice. On July 23, 2015,
the IA filed a response in support of the
motion to strike. On July 30, 2015,
InterDigital filed a response opposing
the motion to strike.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the RID, the
petitions for review, the responses
thereto, and the parties’ submissions on
review, the Commission has determined
to find no violation of section 337 with
respect to the ’966 and ’847 patents.
Specifically, the Commission finds
that issue preclusion applies with
respect to the proper construction of the
claim limitation ‘‘successively
[transmits/transmitted] signals’’ based
on the Commission’s determination in
Certain Wireless Devices with 3G and/
or 4G Capabilities and Components
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Thereof, Inv. No. 337–TA–868, which
relies substantively on the
Commission’s determination in Certain
Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities
and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337–
TA–800, as affirmed by the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit (InterDigital Commc’ns, Inc. v.
Int’l Trade Comm’n, 2015 WL 669305
(Fed. Cir. Feb. 18. 2015)). The
Commission further finds its prior
constructions of the claim limitation
‘‘successively [transmits/transmitted]
signals’’ in the 868 and 800
investigations are persuasive authority
which the Commission should apply
uniformly to the asserted patents.
The Commission also finds that issue
preclusion requires a finding of noninfringement with respect to the
asserted claims of the ’966 and ’847
patents, and that the evidence in the
record independently supports a finding
of non-infringement with respect to the
claim limitation ‘‘successively
[transmits/transmitted] signals as
previously construed by the
Commission in the 868 investigation.
The Commission denies as moot
Respondents motion to strike the
declaration of Dr. Jackson.
The investigation is terminated.
The Commission will issue an
opinion reflecting its decision within
seven days of this notice.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 28, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–21896 Filed 9–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. TA–131–040]
WTO Environmental Goods Trade
Negotiations: Advice on the Probable
Economic Effect of Providing DutyFree Treatment, Second List of Articles
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation,
scheduling of public hearing, and
opportunity to provide written
submissions.
AGENCY:
Following receipt of a request
dated August 20, 2015 (received August
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 171 / Thursday, September 3, 2015 / Notices
21, 2015) from the United States Trade
Representative (USTR) under section
131 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2151), the U.S. International Trade
Commission (Commission) instituted
investigation No. TA–131–040, WTO
Environmental Goods Trade
Negotiations: Advice on the Probable
Economic Effect of Providing Duty-Free
Treatment, Second List of Articles.
DATES:
October 5, 2015: Deadline for filing
requests to appear at the public
hearing.
October 6, 2015: Deadline for filing prehearing briefs and statements.
October 14, 2015: Public hearing.
October 19, 2015: Deadline for filing
post-hearing briefs and statements.
October 19, 2015: Deadline for filing all
other written submissions.
December 4, 2015: Transmittal to USTR
of Commission’s report.
ADDRESSES: All Commission offices,
including the Commission’s hearing
rooms, are located in the United States
International Trade Commission
Building, 500 E Street SW., Washington,
DC. All written submissions should be
addressed to the Secretary, United
States International Trade Commission,
500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20436. The public record for this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/
edis.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Project Leader Mahnaz Khan (202–205–
2046 or mahnaz.khan@usitc.gov), or
Deputy Project Leader Karl Tsuji (202–
708–3434 or karl.tsuji@usitc.gov) for
information specific to this
investigation. For information on the
legal aspects of this investigation,
contact William Gearhart of the
Commission’s Office of the General
Counsel (202–205–3091 or
william.gearhart@usitc.gov). The media
should contact Margaret O’Laughlin,
Office of External Relations (202–205–
1819 or margaret.olaughlin@usitc.gov).
Hearing-impaired individuals may
obtain information on this matter by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal at 202–205–1810. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
Persons with mobility impairments who
will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should
contact the Office of the Secretary at
202–205–2000.
Background: In his letter, the USTR
noted that he had notified Congress on
March 21, 2014, of the President’s intent
to enter into negotiations with a group
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 Sep 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
of World Trade Organization (WTO)
Members to eliminate tariffs on
environmental goods, and that on July 8,
2014, the United States and thirteen
other WTO members launched
negotiations on the Environmental
Goods Agreement (EGA). The USTR also
noted that, in preparation for the EGA
negotiations, he had requested, and the
Commission provided, two reports in
2014 with advice and information on
U.S. environmental goods trade. He also
noted that the product coverage
submitted for preparation of those
reports was provisional, given the
absence of a universally accepted
definition of an ‘‘environmental good.’’
He said that during the course of the
EGA negotiations and USTR’s
preparatory consultations, a range of
additional potential products have been
identified.
As requested by the USTR, the
Commission will, pursuant to section
131 of the Trade Act of 1974, provide
a report containing its advice as to the
probable economic effect of providing
duty-free treatment for imports of these
additional potential products (as
identified in the list attached to the
USTR’s letter) from all U.S. trading
partners on (i) industries in the United
States producing like or directly
competitive products, and (ii)
consumers. As requested, the report will
provide analysis for each of the
additional potential products for which
U.S. tariffs remain, taking into account
implementation of U.S. commitments in
the WTO. The Commission’s advice will
be based on the U.S. tariff nomenclature
in effect during 2015 and trade data for
2014. As requested, the Commission
will provide its report to the USTR by
December 4, 2015.
The USTR stated that portions of the
Commission’s report will be classified
as national security information and
that the USTR considers the report to be
an inter-agency memorandum that will
contain pre-decisional advice and be
subject to the deliberative process
privilege.
Public Hearing: A public hearing in
connection with this investigation will
be held at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC, beginning at 9:40 a.m.
on October 14, 2015. Requests to appear
at the public hearing should be filed
with the Secretary, no later than 5:15
p.m., October 5, 2015, in accordance
with the requirements in the
‘‘Submissions’’ section below. All prehearing briefs and statements should be
filed not later than 5:15 p.m., October 6,
2015; and all post-hearing briefs and
statements should be filed not later than
5:15 p.m., October 19, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53329
Written Submissions: In lieu of or in
addition to participating in the hearing,
interested parties are invited to file
written submissions concerning this
investigation. All written submissions
should be addressed to the Secretary,
and should be received not later than
5:15 p.m., October 19, 2015. All written
submissions must conform with the
provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8
and the Commission’s Handbook on
Filing Procedures require that interested
parties file documents electronically on
or before the filing deadline and submit
eight (8) true paper copies by 12:00 p.m.
eastern time on the next business day.
In the event that confidential treatment
of a document is requested, interested
parties must file, at the same time as the
eight paper copies, at least four (4)
additional true paper copies in which
the confidential information must be
deleted (see the following paragraph for
further information regarding
confidential business information).
Persons with questions regarding
electronic filing should contact the
Office of the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any submissions that contain
confidential business information (CBI)
must also conform with the
requirements of section 201.6 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.6). Section 201.6
of the rules requires that the cover of the
document and the individual pages be
clearly marked as to whether they are
the ‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’
version, and that the confidential
business information be clearly
identified by means of brackets. All
written submissions, except for
confidential business information, will
be made available for inspection by
interested parties.
The Commission may include some or
all of the confidential business
information submitted in the course of
this investigation in the report it sends
to the USTR. The Commission will not
otherwise publish any confidential
business information in a manner that
would reveal the operations of the firm
supplying the information.
Summaries of Written Submissions:
The Commission intends to publish
summaries of the positions of interested
persons in an appendix to its report.
Persons wishing to have a summary of
their position included in the appendix
should include a summary with their
written submission. The summary may
not exceed 500 words, should be in
MSWord format or a format that can be
easily converted to MSWord, and
should not include any confidential
business information. The summary will
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
53330
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 171 / Thursday, September 3, 2015 / Notices
be published as provided if it meets
these requirements and is germane to
the subject matter of the investigation.
In the appendix the Commission will
identify the name of the organization
furnishing the summary, and will
include a link to the Commission’s
Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) where the full written
submission can be found.
Issued: August 28, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–21879 Filed 9–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2012–0014]
The Lead in Construction Standard;
Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork)
Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements
contained in the Lead in Construction
Standard (29 CFR 1926.62).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
November 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
your comments and attachments to the
OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2012–0014, Occupational Safety
and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–2625,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries
(hand, express mail, messenger, and
courier service) are accepted during the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 Sep 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Department of Labor’s and Docket
Office’s normal business hours, 8:15
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and the OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2012–0014) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from the Web site. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You also may contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing collection of
information requirements in accord
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA–95) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures
that information is in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH
Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The purpose of the Lead in
Construction Standard and its collection
of information (paperwork)
requirements is to reduce occupational
lead exposure in the construction
industry. Lead exposure can result in
both acute and chronic effects and can
be fatal in severe cases of lead toxicity.
Some of the health effects associated
with lead exposure include brain
disorders which can lead to seizures,
coma, and death; anemia; neurological
problems; high blood pressure; kidney
problems; reproductive problems; and
decreased red blood cell production.
The major collection of information
requirements of the Standard are:
Conducting worker exposure
assessments; notifying workers of their
lead exposures; establishing,
implementing and reviewing a written
compliance program annually; labeling
containers of contaminated protective
clothing and equipment; providing
medical surveillance to workers;
providing examining physicians with
specific information; ensuring that
workers receive a copy of their medical
surveillance results; posting warning
signs; establishing and maintaining
exposure monitoring, medical
surveillance, medical removal and
objective data records; and providing
workers with access to these records.
The records are used by employees,
physicians, employers and OSHA to
determine the effectiveness of the
employer’s compliance efforts.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed collection of
information requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
collection of information requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM
03SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 171 (Thursday, September 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53328-53330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21879]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. TA-131-040]
WTO Environmental Goods Trade Negotiations: Advice on the
Probable Economic Effect of Providing Duty-Free Treatment, Second List
of Articles
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation, scheduling of public hearing, and
opportunity to provide written submissions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Following receipt of a request dated August 20, 2015 (received
August
[[Page 53329]]
21, 2015) from the United States Trade Representative (USTR) under
section 131 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2151), the U.S.
International Trade Commission (Commission) instituted investigation
No. TA-131-040, WTO Environmental Goods Trade Negotiations: Advice on
the Probable Economic Effect of Providing Duty-Free Treatment, Second
List of Articles.
DATES:
October 5, 2015: Deadline for filing requests to appear at the public
hearing.
October 6, 2015: Deadline for filing pre-hearing briefs and statements.
October 14, 2015: Public hearing.
October 19, 2015: Deadline for filing post-hearing briefs and
statements.
October 19, 2015: Deadline for filing all other written submissions.
December 4, 2015: Transmittal to USTR of Commission's report.
ADDRESSES: All Commission offices, including the Commission's hearing
rooms, are located in the United States International Trade Commission
Building, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC. All written submissions
should be addressed to the Secretary, United States International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Project Leader Mahnaz Khan (202-205-
2046 or mahnaz.khan@usitc.gov), or Deputy Project Leader Karl Tsuji
(202-708-3434 or karl.tsuji@usitc.gov) for information specific to this
investigation. For information on the legal aspects of this
investigation, contact William Gearhart of the Commission's Office of
the General Counsel (202-205-3091 or william.gearhart@usitc.gov). The
media should contact Margaret O'Laughlin, Office of External Relations
(202-205-1819 or margaret.olaughlin@usitc.gov). Hearing-impaired
individuals may obtain information on this matter by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.
Background: In his letter, the USTR noted that he had notified
Congress on March 21, 2014, of the President's intent to enter into
negotiations with a group of World Trade Organization (WTO) Members to
eliminate tariffs on environmental goods, and that on July 8, 2014, the
United States and thirteen other WTO members launched negotiations on
the Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA). The USTR also noted that, in
preparation for the EGA negotiations, he had requested, and the
Commission provided, two reports in 2014 with advice and information on
U.S. environmental goods trade. He also noted that the product coverage
submitted for preparation of those reports was provisional, given the
absence of a universally accepted definition of an ``environmental
good.'' He said that during the course of the EGA negotiations and
USTR's preparatory consultations, a range of additional potential
products have been identified.
As requested by the USTR, the Commission will, pursuant to section
131 of the Trade Act of 1974, provide a report containing its advice as
to the probable economic effect of providing duty-free treatment for
imports of these additional potential products (as identified in the
list attached to the USTR's letter) from all U.S. trading partners on
(i) industries in the United States producing like or directly
competitive products, and (ii) consumers. As requested, the report will
provide analysis for each of the additional potential products for
which U.S. tariffs remain, taking into account implementation of U.S.
commitments in the WTO. The Commission's advice will be based on the
U.S. tariff nomenclature in effect during 2015 and trade data for 2014.
As requested, the Commission will provide its report to the USTR by
December 4, 2015.
The USTR stated that portions of the Commission's report will be
classified as national security information and that the USTR considers
the report to be an inter-agency memorandum that will contain pre-
decisional advice and be subject to the deliberative process privilege.
Public Hearing: A public hearing in connection with this
investigation will be held at the U.S. International Trade Commission
Building, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC, beginning at 9:40 a.m. on
October 14, 2015. Requests to appear at the public hearing should be
filed with the Secretary, no later than 5:15 p.m., October 5, 2015, in
accordance with the requirements in the ``Submissions'' section below.
All pre-hearing briefs and statements should be filed not later than
5:15 p.m., October 6, 2015; and all post-hearing briefs and statements
should be filed not later than 5:15 p.m., October 19, 2015.
Written Submissions: In lieu of or in addition to participating in
the hearing, interested parties are invited to file written submissions
concerning this investigation. All written submissions should be
addressed to the Secretary, and should be received not later than 5:15
p.m., October 19, 2015. All written submissions must conform with the
provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8 and the Commission's Handbook
on Filing Procedures require that interested parties file documents
electronically on or before the filing deadline and submit eight (8)
true paper copies by 12:00 p.m. eastern time on the next business day.
In the event that confidential treatment of a document is requested,
interested parties must file, at the same time as the eight paper
copies, at least four (4) additional true paper copies in which the
confidential information must be deleted (see the following paragraph
for further information regarding confidential business information).
Persons with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the
Office of the Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any submissions that contain confidential business information
(CBI) must also conform with the requirements of section 201.6 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.6). Section
201.6 of the rules requires that the cover of the document and the
individual pages be clearly marked as to whether they are the
``confidential'' or ``non-confidential'' version, and that the
confidential business information be clearly identified by means of
brackets. All written submissions, except for confidential business
information, will be made available for inspection by interested
parties.
The Commission may include some or all of the confidential business
information submitted in the course of this investigation in the report
it sends to the USTR. The Commission will not otherwise publish any
confidential business information in a manner that would reveal the
operations of the firm supplying the information.
Summaries of Written Submissions: The Commission intends to publish
summaries of the positions of interested persons in an appendix to its
report. Persons wishing to have a summary of their position included in
the appendix should include a summary with their written submission.
The summary may not exceed 500 words, should be in MSWord format or a
format that can be easily converted to MSWord, and should not include
any confidential business information. The summary will
[[Page 53330]]
be published as provided if it meets these requirements and is germane
to the subject matter of the investigation. In the appendix the
Commission will identify the name of the organization furnishing the
summary, and will include a link to the Commission's Electronic
Document Information System (EDIS) where the full written submission
can be found.
Issued: August 28, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-21879 Filed 9-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P