Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From the Netherlands: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Intent to Revoke the Antidumping Duty Order, 52447-52448 [2015-21504]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 168 / Monday, August 31, 2015 / Notices
Dated: August 25, 2015.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
published in accordance with sections
751(h) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended.
Dated: August 21, 2015.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–21503 Filed 8–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
[FR Doc. 2015–21375 Filed 8–28–15; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
[A–570–970]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China: Correction
to the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
International Trade Administration
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit
Astvatsatrian or William Horn, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6412 or (202) 482–
2615, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
15, 2015, the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published the final
results of the 2012–2013 administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on multilayered wood flooring from the
People’s Republic of China.1 The period
of review (‘‘POR’’) is December 1, 2012,
through November 30, 2013. The
Department is issuing this notice to
correct an inadvertent error in the Final
Results. Specifically, the Department
initiated a review of Baishan Huafeng
Wood Product Co. Ltd. (‘‘Baishan
Huafeng Wood’’),2 and the company
listed in the Final Results is also
Baishan Huafeng Wood. However, the
record reflects that the correct company
name, and the company to which the
Department assigned a separate rate, is
Baishan Huafeng Wooden Product Co.
Ltd. (‘‘Baishan Huafeng Wooden’’).3
Accordingly, we intended to include
Baishan Huafeng Wooden, not Baishan
Huafeng Wood, in the list of companies
that received a separate rate during the
POR as identified in our Final Results.
This correction to the final results of
administrative review is issued and
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 80 FR 41476 (July 15, 2015) (‘‘Final Results’’).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 6147
(February 3, 2014).
3 See April 3, 2014 Separate Rate Certification for
Baishan Huafeng.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Aug 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
[A–421–811]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From
the Netherlands: Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Review and Intent to
Revoke the Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request by
Ashland Specialty Ingredients, G.P.
(Ashland), the Department of Commerce
(the Department) is initiating a changed
circumstances review (CCR) of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)
from the Netherlands. Based on the
information received, we preliminarily
intend to revoke the Netherlands
Order.1 Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury, or Angelica Townsend, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
3019, respectively.
DATES: Effective Date: August 31, 2015.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 11, 2005, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
AD order on CMC from the
Netherlands.2 On July 8, 2015, in
accordance with sections 751(b) and
751(d)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.216(b),
and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1), Ashland, the
petitioner and sole domestic producer of
CMC, requested revocation of the
Netherlands Order. Ashland requested
that the Department conduct the CCR on
an expedited basis pursuant to 19 CFR
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders:
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,
Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 70 FR 39734
(July 11, 2005) (Netherlands Order).
2 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52447
351.221(c)(3)(ii) and that the effective
date of the revocation be July 1, 2014.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is all purified CMC, sometimes
also referred to as purified sodium CMC,
polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum,
which is a white to off-white, non-toxic,
odorless, biodegradable powder,
comprising sodium CMC that has been
refined and purified to a minimum
assay of 90 percent. Purified CMC does
not include unpurified or crude CMC,
CMC Fluidized Polymer Suspensions,
and CMC that is cross-linked through
heat treatment. Purified CMC is CMC
that has undergone one or more
purification operations which, at a
minimum, reduce the remaining salt
and other by-product portion of the
product to less than ten percent.
The merchandise subject to this order
is classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States at
subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff
classification is provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Changed Circumstances Review
Section 782(h)(2) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.222(g)(1)(i) provide that the
Department may revoke an order (in
whole or in part) if it determines that
producers accounting for substantially
all of the production of the domestic
like product have no further interest in
the order, in whole or in part. In
addition, in the event the Department
determines that expedited action is
warranted, 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii)
permits the Department to combine the
notices of initiation and preliminary
results.
On July 8, 2015, Ashland requested
that the Department conduct the CCR on
an expedited basis. Ashland stated that,
as the sole U.S. producer of CMC, it
accounts for all of the production of the
domestic like product. Ashland also
stated that it has no interest in the
continuation of the Netherlands Order.3
Therefore, at the request of Ashland
and in accordance with sections
751(b)(1) and 751(d)(1) of the Act, 19
CFR 351.216, 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1), and
19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii), we are
initiating this CCR on CMC from the
Netherlands to determine whether
revocation of the order is warranted
with respect to this product. In addition,
we determine that expedited action is
warranted. In accordance with 19 CFR
3 See Ashland’s July 8, 2015, submission to the
Department.
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
52448
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 168 / Monday, August 31, 2015 / Notices
351.222(g)(1), we find that the
petitioner’s affirmative statements of no
interest constitutes good cause to
conduct this review and we find that
revocation of the order is appropriate for
these preliminary results. Additionally,
our decision to expedite this review by
combining the notice of initiation and
the preliminary results in a single notice
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii)
stems from the domestic industry’s lack
of interest in applying the Netherlands
Order. If the final results of this changed
circumstances review result in the
revocation of this order, the Department
intends that such revocation will be
effective the first day of the most recent
period not subject to administrative
review, which is currently July 1, 2014.
any cash deposit or bond.10 The current
requirement for a cash deposit of
estimated AD duties on all subject
merchandise will continue unless and
until it is modified pursuant to the final
results of this changed circumstances
review.
This initiation and preliminary results
of review notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216,
19 CFR 351.221(b)(1), (4), and 19 CFR
351.222(g).
Dated: August 24, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–21504 Filed 8–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Public Comment
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Interested parties may submit case
briefs and/or written comments in
response to these preliminary results
not later than 14 days after the
publication of this notice.4 Rebuttal
briefs, and rebuttals to written
comments, which must be limited to
issues raised in such briefs or
comments, may be filed not later than
21 days after the date of publication of
this notice.5 Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this changed
circumstance review are requested to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; and (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.6 Interested parties
who wish to comment on the
preliminary results must file briefs
electronically using Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).7
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. An
electronically-filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the
date the document is due.
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 14 days of publication of
this notice.8 Parties will be notified of
the time and date of any hearing if
requested.9
If final revocation occurs, we will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to end the suspension of
liquidation for the merchandise covered
by the revocation on the effective date
of the notice of revocation and to release
4 See
19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
19 CFR 351.309(d).
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2).
7 See 19 CFR 351.303 for general filing
requirements.
8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c)
9 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
5 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Aug 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Minority Business Development
Agency
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Online Customer
Relationship Management (CRM)/
Performance Databases, the Online
Phoenix Database, and the Online
Opportunity Database
Minority Business
Development Agency (MBDA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before October 30,
2015.
SUMMARY:
Direct all written comments
to Sheleen Dumas, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at sdumas@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Nakita Chambers, Program
Manager, Minority Business
Development Agency, U.S. Department
of Commerce, Office of Business
Development, 1401 Constitution
ADDRESSES:
10 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.222(g)(4).
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230,
(202) 482–0065, and email: nchambers@
mbda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
As part of its national service delivery
system, MBDA awards cooperative
agreements each year to fund the
provision of business development
services to eligible minority business
enterprises (MBEs). The recipient of
each cooperative agreement is
competitively selected to operate one of
the MBDA’s Business Center programs.
In accordance with the Government
Performance Results Act (GPRA), MBDA
requires all center operators to report
basic client information, service
activities and progress on attainment of
program goals via the Online CRM/
Performance database. The data inputs
into the CRM/Performance database
originate from the client intake forms
used by each center to collect
information from each minority
business enterprise that receives
technical business assistance from the
center. This data provides the baseline
from which the CRM/Performance
database is populated. The Online CRM/
Performance Database is used to
regularly monitor and evaluate the
progress of the MBDA funded centers, to
provide the Department and OMB with
a summary of the quantitative
information required to be submitted
about government supported programs,
and to implement the GPRA. This
information is also summarized and
included in the MBDA Annual
Performance Report, which is made
available to the public.
In addition to the information
collected from MBEs to provide service
and performance reports, the MBDA
Center award recipients are required to
list MBEs to conduct business in the
United States in the Online Phoenix
Database. This listing is used to match
those registered MBEs with
opportunities entered in the Online
Opportunity Database by public and
private sector entities. The MBEs may
also self-register via the Online Phoenix
Database for notification of potential
business opportunities.
In 2012, the overall estimate of
burden hours decreased for users under
the newly adopted program structure as
a result of the streamlining of certain
administrative and reporting
requirements. The MBDA Business
Center programs will continue to use
the Customer Relationship
Management/Performance, Phoenix and
Business Opportunity databases until
the new program is redesigned during
Fiscal Year 2016.
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 168 (Monday, August 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52447-52448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21504]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-421-811]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From the Netherlands: Initiation
and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Intent to
Revoke the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request by Ashland Specialty Ingredients,
G.P. (Ashland), the Department of Commerce (the Department) is
initiating a changed circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping duty
(AD) order on purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from the
Netherlands. Based on the information received, we preliminarily intend
to revoke the Netherlands Order.\1\ Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, Mexico, the Netherlands and
Sweden, 70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005) (Netherlands Order).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury, or Angelica Townsend, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
0195 or (202) 482-3019, respectively.
DATES: Effective Date: August 31, 2015.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 11, 2005, the Department published in the Federal Register
the AD order on CMC from the Netherlands.\2\ On July 8, 2015, in
accordance with sections 751(b) and 751(d)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR
351.216(b), and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1), Ashland, the petitioner and sole
domestic producer of CMC, requested revocation of the Netherlands
Order. Ashland requested that the Department conduct the CCR on an
expedited basis pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii) and that the
effective date of the revocation be July 1, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is all purified CMC,
sometimes also referred to as purified sodium CMC, polyanionic
cellulose, or cellulose gum, which is a white to off-white, non-toxic,
odorless, biodegradable powder, comprising sodium CMC that has been
refined and purified to a minimum assay of 90 percent. Purified CMC
does not include unpurified or crude CMC, CMC Fluidized Polymer
Suspensions, and CMC that is cross-linked through heat treatment.
Purified CMC is CMC that has undergone one or more purification
operations which, at a minimum, reduce the remaining salt and other by-
product portion of the product to less than ten percent.
The merchandise subject to this order is classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading
3912.31.00. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and
customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review
Section 782(h)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1)(i) provide
that the Department may revoke an order (in whole or in part) if it
determines that producers accounting for substantially all of the
production of the domestic like product have no further interest in the
order, in whole or in part. In addition, in the event the Department
determines that expedited action is warranted, 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii)
permits the Department to combine the notices of initiation and
preliminary results.
On July 8, 2015, Ashland requested that the Department conduct the
CCR on an expedited basis. Ashland stated that, as the sole U.S.
producer of CMC, it accounts for all of the production of the domestic
like product. Ashland also stated that it has no interest in the
continuation of the Netherlands Order.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Ashland's July 8, 2015, submission to the Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, at the request of Ashland and in accordance with
sections 751(b)(1) and 751(d)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.216, 19 CFR
351.222(g)(1), and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii), we are initiating this CCR
on CMC from the Netherlands to determine whether revocation of the
order is warranted with respect to this product. In addition, we
determine that expedited action is warranted. In accordance with 19 CFR
[[Page 52448]]
351.222(g)(1), we find that the petitioner's affirmative statements of
no interest constitutes good cause to conduct this review and we find
that revocation of the order is appropriate for these preliminary
results. Additionally, our decision to expedite this review by
combining the notice of initiation and the preliminary results in a
single notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii) stems from the
domestic industry's lack of interest in applying the Netherlands Order.
If the final results of this changed circumstances review result in the
revocation of this order, the Department intends that such revocation
will be effective the first day of the most recent period not subject
to administrative review, which is currently July 1, 2014.
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case briefs and/or written comments
in response to these preliminary results not later than 14 days after
the publication of this notice.\4\ Rebuttal briefs, and rebuttals to
written comments, which must be limited to issues raised in such briefs
or comments, may be filed not later than 21 days after the date of
publication of this notice.\5\ Parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this changed circumstance review are requested to
submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; and (2) a
brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\6\
Interested parties who wish to comment on the preliminary results must
file briefs electronically using Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS).\7\ ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. An electronically-filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the
date the document is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2).
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.303 for general filing requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested party may request a hearing within 14 days of
publication of this notice.\8\ Parties will be notified of the time and
date of any hearing if requested.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c)
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If final revocation occurs, we will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to end the suspension of liquidation for the
merchandise covered by the revocation on the effective date of the
notice of revocation and to release any cash deposit or bond.\10\ The
current requirement for a cash deposit of estimated AD duties on all
subject merchandise will continue unless and until it is modified
pursuant to the final results of this changed circumstances review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.222(g)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This initiation and preliminary results of review notice is
published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.216, 19 CFR 351.221(b)(1), (4), and 19 CFR
351.222(g).
Dated: August 24, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-21504 Filed 8-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P