Chloropicrin From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 47467 [2015-19480]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 152 / Friday, August 7, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–002]
Chloropicrin From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 1, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated a sunset review
of the antidumping duty order on
chloropicrin from the People’s Republic
of China (‘‘PRC’’) 1 pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’). Based on the
notice of intent to participate and
adequate response filed by the domestic
interested parties, and the lack of
response from any respondent
interested party, the Department
conducted an expedited sunset review
of the Order pursuant. As a result of this
sunset review, the Department finds that
revocation of the Order would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Effective date: August 7, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–5193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On April 1, 2015, the Department
initiated a sunset review of the order on
chloropicrin from the PRC pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Act.2 On April 15,
2015, the Department received a timely
notice of intent to participate in the
sunset review from Ashta Chemicals,
Inc. (‘‘Ashta’’), Niklor Chemical
Company, Inc. (‘‘Niklor’’), and Trinity
Manufacturing, Inc. (‘‘Trinity’’),
domestic interested parties, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). On May 1,
2015, Ashta, Niklor, and Trinity filed a
timely substantive response with the
Department pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i) . The Department did
not receive a substantive response from
1 See Antidumping Duty Order; Chloropicrin from
the People’s Republic of China, 49 FR 10691 (March
22, 1984) (‘‘Order’’).
2 See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
FR 17388 (April 1, 2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Aug 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
any respondent interested party. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted an expedited sunset review
of the Order.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
antidumping duty order is chloropicrin,
also known as trichloronitromethane. A
major use of the product is as a preplant soil fumigant (pesticide). Such
merchandise is currently classifiable
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(‘‘HTS’’) item number 2904.90.50.05.3
The HTS item number is provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The
written description remains dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review
are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the
Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on
Chloropicrin from the People’s Republic
of China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted
by, this notice (‘‘Decision
Memorandum’’). The issues discussed
in the Decision Memorandum include
the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the Order were to be revoked.
Parties may find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in the review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum is available
directly on the Web at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to Section 752(c)(3) of the
Act, the Department determines that
revocation of the Order would be likely
3 In 2004, a new HTS category was developed and
identified specifically for imports of chloropicrin,
i.e., 2904.90.50.05. Previously, the HTS category
that included chloropicrin was 2904.90.50.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47467
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at weighted average margins
up to 58.00 percent.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order
(‘‘APO’’’) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of the
return or destruction of APO materials
or conversion to judicial protective
order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject
to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: July 29, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–19480 Filed 8–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–818]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) is
conducting an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
pasta (pasta) from Italy,1 covering the
period July 1, 2013, through June 30,
2014. The initiation of the instant
review 2 covered six companies, and we
have partially rescinded the review with
respect to two companies, as discussed
below.3 Thus, this review covers four
companies: The mandatory respondents,
La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana) and
AGENCY:
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR
38547 (July 24, 1996).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
51548 (August 29, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
3 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 80 FR 4541 (January 28, 2015) (Partial
Rescission).
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 152 (Friday, August 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 47467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19480]
[[Page 47467]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-002]
Chloropicrin From the People's Republic of China: Final Results
of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 1, 2015, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty order
on chloropicrin from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') \1\
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the
Act''). Based on the notice of intent to participate and adequate
response filed by the domestic interested parties, and the lack of
response from any respondent interested party, the Department conducted
an expedited sunset review of the Order pursuant. As a result of this
sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the Order would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels
indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Review''' section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Chloropicrin from the People's
Republic of China, 49 FR 10691 (March 22, 1984) (``Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective date: August 7, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 1, 2015, the Department initiated a sunset review of the
order on chloropicrin from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Act.\2\ On April 15, 2015, the Department received a timely notice of
intent to participate in the sunset review from Ashta Chemicals, Inc.
(``Ashta''), Niklor Chemical Company, Inc. (``Niklor''), and Trinity
Manufacturing, Inc. (``Trinity''), domestic interested parties,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). On May 1, 2015, Ashta, Niklor, and
Trinity filed a timely substantive response with the Department
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i) . The Department did not receive a
substantive response from any respondent interested party. As a result,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited sunset
review of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 17388
(April 1, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is
chloropicrin, also known as trichloronitromethane. A major use of the
product is as a pre-plant soil fumigant (pesticide). Such merchandise
is currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule (``HTS'')
item number 2904.90.50.05.\3\ The HTS item number is provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The written description remains
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In 2004, a new HTS category was developed and identified
specifically for imports of chloropicrin, i.e., 2904.90.50.05.
Previously, the HTS category that included chloropicrin was
2904.90.50.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Chloropicrin from the People's Republic of
China'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (``Decision Memorandum''). The
issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins
likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked. Parties may find a
complete discussion of all issues raised in the review and the
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System
(``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum is available
directly on the Web at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to Section 752(c)(3) of the Act, the Department determines
that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at weighted average margins up to 58.00 percent.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO''') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218.
Dated: July 29, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-19480 Filed 8-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P