Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 46955-46956 [2015-19358]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Notices
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
Access to ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision
Memorandum is available directly on
the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
For purposes of the order, the term
‘‘certain crepe paper’’ includes crepe
paper products that have a basis weight
not exceeding 29 grams per square
meter prior to being creped and, if
appropriate, flame-proofed. Crepe paper
has a finely wrinkled surface texture
and typically but not exclusively is
treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe
paper is typically but not exclusively
produced as streamers in roll form and
packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper
may or may not be bleached, dye
colored, surface-colored, surface
decorated or printed, glazed, sequined,
embossed, die-cut, and/or flame
retardant. Subject crepe paper may be
rolled, flat or folded, and may be
packaged by banding or wrapping with
paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/
or by placing in boxes for distribution
and use by the ultimate consumer.
Packages of crepe paper subject to the
order may consist solely of crepe paper
of one color and/or style, or may contain
multiple colors and/or styles. The
merchandise subject to the order does
not have specific classification numbers
assigned to them under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Subject merchandise may
be under one or more of several
different HTSUS subheadings,
including: 4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61;
4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.39; 4806.40;
4808.30; 4808.90; 4811.90; 4818.90;
4823.90; 9505.90.40. The tariff
classifications are provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act,
we determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on crepe paper
from the PRC would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at weighted-average margins up to
266.83 percent.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Aug 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return of
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This sunset review and notice are in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),
and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218.
Dated: July 24, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–19355 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–838; A–570–892]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
India and the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Expedited
Second Sunset Reviews of
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on
carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP–23)
from India and the People’s Republic of
China (the PRC) would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kaitlin Wojnar, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482–
3857.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 29, 2004, the
Department of Commerce (the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46955
Department) published the AD orders
on CVP–23 from India and the PRC.1 On
April 1, 2015, pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), the Department published
notice of the initiation of the second
sunset reviews of the antidumping duty
orders on CVP–23 from India and the
PRC.2 On April 13, 2015, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), the
following domestic CVP–23 producers
timely notified the Department of their
intent to participate in these reviews:
Nation Ford Chemical Company and
Sun Chemical Corporation (collectively,
Petitioners).3 Petitioners claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of
a domestic like product in the United
States. On May 1, 2015, we received a
complete substantive response for each
review from Petitioners within the 30day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no
substantive responses from any
respondent interested parties. As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted expedited sunset reviews of
these orders.
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to this AD
Order is CVP–23. Imports of
merchandise included within the scope
of this order are currently classifiable
under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice, provides a full
description of the scope of the order.5
1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004); and
Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 From the People’s Republic of China, 69 FR
77987 (December 29, 2004).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
FR 17388 (April 1, 2015).
3 See Letters from Petitioners, ‘‘Carbazole Violet
Pigment 23 from India/Notice of Intent to
Participate in Second Sunset Review of
Antidumping Duty Order’’ and ‘‘Carbazole Violet
Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China/
Notice of Intent to Participate in Second Sunset
Review of Antidumping Duty Order,’’ April 13,
2015.
4 See Letters from Petitioners, ‘‘Carbazole Violet
Pigment 23 from India/Petitioners’ Substantive
Response’’ and ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from
the People’s Republic of China/Petitioners’
Substantive Response,’’ May 1, 2015.
5 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Carbazole Violet
Pigment 23 from India and the People’s Republic
of China’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice.
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
46956
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Notices
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews,
including the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping in the event
of revocation and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the orders
are revoked, are addressed in the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is available electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is accessible to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Department’s Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the Department’s main
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be viewed at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Dated: July 30, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–19358 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–825]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From India:
Preliminary Results and Partial
Recission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review under the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip (PET film) from India for the
period of review (POR) January 1, 2013,
through December 31, 2013. We
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
preliminarily determine that Jindal Poly
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
Films Limited of India (Jindal) and SRF
752(c)(1)–(3) of the Act, we determine
Limited (SRF) received countervailable
that revocation of the antidumping duty subsidies during the POR. See the
‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’
orders on CVP–23 from India and the
section, below. Interested parties are
PRC would likely lead to continuation
invited to comment on these
or recurrence of dumping up to the
preliminary results.
following weighted-average margin
percentages:
DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi
Weighted- Blum, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
average
Enforcement and Compliance,
Country
dumping
International Trade Administration,
margin
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
(percent)
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
India ............................................
44.80 Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
PRC ............................................
241.32 482–0197.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 771(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Aug 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
AGENCY:
Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
The Department initiated a review of
eight companies in this proceeding.1 In
response to timely filed withdrawal
requests, we are rescinding this
administrative review with respect to
MTZ and Uflex pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1). Accordingly, the
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
51548 (August 29, 2014) (Initiation Notice). The
seven companies were Ester Industries Limited
(Ester), Garware Polyester Ltd. (Garware), Jindal
Poly Films Limited of India (Jindal), MTZ
Polyesters Ltd. (MTZ), Polyplex Corporation Ltd.
(Polyplex), SRF Limited (SRF), and Vacmet. See
also, Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 76956
(December 23, 2014). The one additional company
was Uflex Ltd (Uflex), which was inadvertently
omitted from the prior initiation notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
companies subject to the instant review
are: Ester, Garware, Polyplex, SRF,
Jindal, Vacmet, and Vacmet India
Limited, of which the Department has
selected Jindal and SRF as the
mandatory respondents.2
Scope of the Order
For purposes of the order, the
products covered are all gauges of raw,
pretreated, or primed polyethylene
terephthalate film, sheet and strip,
whether extruded or coextruded.
Excluded are metallized films and other
finished films that have had at least one
of their surfaces modified by the
application of a performance-enhancing
resinous or inorganic layer of more than
0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET
film are classifiable in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item number
3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes. The written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Methodology
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). For each of the
subsidy programs found
countervailable, we preliminarily
determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a
government-provided financial
contribution that gives rise to a benefit
to the recipient, and that the subsidy is
specific.3 For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Memorandum from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, titled ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of the
Countervailing Duty (CVD)
Administrative Review of Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
(PET film) from India; 2013’’
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
2 See
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
3 See
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46955-46956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19358]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-838; A-570-892]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People's Republic
of China: Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of
Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP-23) from India and the
People's Republic of China (the PRC) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the
``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaitlin Wojnar, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482-
3857.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 29, 2004, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the AD orders on CVP-23 from India and the PRC.\1\ On April
1, 2015, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the Department published notice of the initiation of
the second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on CVP-23 from
India and the PRC.\2\ On April 13, 2015, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i), the following domestic CVP-23 producers timely
notified the Department of their intent to participate in these
reviews: Nation Ford Chemical Company and Sun Chemical Corporation
(collectively, Petitioners).\3\ Petitioners claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of a
domestic like product in the United States. On May 1, 2015, we received
a complete substantive response for each review from Petitioners within
the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\4\ We
received no substantive responses from any respondent interested
parties. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited
sunset reviews of these orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 From India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004); and Antidumping Duty
Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People's Republic of
China, 69 FR 77987 (December 29, 2004).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 17388
(April 1, 2015).
\3\ See Letters from Petitioners, ``Carbazole Violet Pigment 23
from India/Notice of Intent to Participate in Second Sunset Review
of Antidumping Duty Order'' and ``Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from
the People's Republic of China/Notice of Intent to Participate in
Second Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order,'' April 13, 2015.
\4\ See Letters from Petitioners, ``Carbazole Violet Pigment 23
from India/Petitioners' Substantive Response'' and ``Carbazole
Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China/Petitioners'
Substantive Response,'' May 1, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to this AD Order is CVP-23. Imports of
merchandise included within the scope of this order are currently
classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States. The Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice, provides a full description of
the scope of the order.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Department Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum
for the Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India
and the People's Republic of China'' (Issues and Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46956]]
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews, including the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation and
the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the orders are
revoked, are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is accessible to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Department's Central Records
Unit, Room B8024 of the Department's main building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be viewed at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1)-(3) of the Act, we
determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on CVP-23 from
India and the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping up to the following weighted-average margin percentages:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Country dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
India....................................................... 44.80
PRC......................................................... 241.32
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 771(i)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: July 30, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-19358 Filed 8-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
