Certain Crepe Paper Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 46954-46955 [2015-19355]

Download as PDF 46954 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Notices later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Dated: July 30, 2015. Michael S. DeVillo, Eligibility Examiner. [FR Doc. 2015–19283 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–49–2015] tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Foreign-Trade Zone 84—Houston, Texas, Application for Subzone Expansion, Subzone 84P, Houston Refining LP, Houston and Pasadena, Texas 17:50 Aug 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2243. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background International Trade Administration On April 1, 2015, the Department published the notice of initiation of the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from the PRC. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), the Department received notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from Seaman Paper Company of Massachusetts, Inc. (‘‘Seaman Paper’’) within 15 days after the date of publication of the Initiation Notice and the effective date of the initiation of this sunset review.2 Seaman Paper claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act. On April 30, 2015, the Department received an adequate substantive response from Seaman Paper within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).3 We received no responses from respondent interested parties. As a result, the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). [A–570–895] Analysis of Comments Received Certain Crepe Paper Products From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Crepe Paper Products from the People’s Republic of China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’). The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were to be revoked. Parties may find a complete discussion of all issues raised in the review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file Dated: August 3, 2015. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by the Port of Houston Authority, grantee of FTZ 84, requesting additional acreage within Subzone 84P on behalf of Houston Refining LP, located in Houston and Pasadena, Texas. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on August 3, 2015. Subzone 84P was approved on March 6, 1998 (Board Order 961, 63 FR 13170, 3/19/1998) and currently consists of four sites totaling 645 acres: Site 1 (500 acres)—refinery complex located at 12000 Lawndale Road, on the Houston Ship Channel, within the city limits of both Houston and Pasadena; Site 2 (20 acres)—Allendale Tank Farm located south of the refinery, across Lawndale Road; Site 3 (65 acres)—South Tank Farm located south of the refinery, across Lawndale Road, east of Site 2; and, Site 4 (60 acres)—225 Tank Farm located south of Sites 1–3, across State Highway 225. The applicant is requesting authority to expand existing Site 1 to include an additional 5.05 acres (new site total—505.05 acres). No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time. In accordance with the Board’s regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary. VerDate Sep<11>2014 Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is September 15, 2015. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to September 30, 2015. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Camille Evans at Camille.Evans@trade.gov or (202) 482– 2350. [FR Doc. 2015–19372 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 1, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) initiated the second fiveyear (‘‘sunset’’) review of the antidumping duty order on certain crepe paper products (‘‘crepe paper’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1 As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, AGENCY: 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80 FR 17388 (April 1, 2015). PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2 See Letter to the Secretary from Seaman Paper, Five-Year Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Crepe Paper Products from the People’s Republic of China—Notice of Intent to Participate in Review (April 9, 2015). 3 See Letter to the Secretary from Seaman Paper, Five-Year Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Crepe Paper Products from the People’s Republic of China—Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation (April 30, 2015). E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 151 / Thursday, August 6, 2015 / Notices electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum is available directly on the Internet at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order For purposes of the order, the term ‘‘certain crepe paper’’ includes crepe paper products that have a basis weight not exceeding 29 grams per square meter prior to being creped and, if appropriate, flame-proofed. Crepe paper has a finely wrinkled surface texture and typically but not exclusively is treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe paper is typically but not exclusively produced as streamers in roll form and packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper may or may not be bleached, dye colored, surface-colored, surface decorated or printed, glazed, sequined, embossed, die-cut, and/or flame retardant. Subject crepe paper may be rolled, flat or folded, and may be packaged by banding or wrapping with paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/ or by placing in boxes for distribution and use by the ultimate consumer. Packages of crepe paper subject to the order may consist solely of crepe paper of one color and/or style, or may contain multiple colors and/or styles. The merchandise subject to the order does not have specific classification numbers assigned to them under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Subject merchandise may be under one or more of several different HTSUS subheadings, including: 4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; 4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.39; 4806.40; 4808.30; 4808.90; 4811.90; 4818.90; 4823.90; 9505.90.40. The tariff classifications are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Final Results of Review Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted-average margins up to 266.83 percent. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Aug 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return of destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: July 24, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–19355 Filed 8–5–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–838; A–570–892] Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP–23) from India and the People’s Republic of China (the PRC) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaitlin Wojnar, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482– 3857. AGENCY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 29, 2004, the Department of Commerce (the PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 46955 Department) published the AD orders on CVP–23 from India and the PRC.1 On April 1, 2015, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department published notice of the initiation of the second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on CVP–23 from India and the PRC.2 On April 13, 2015, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), the following domestic CVP–23 producers timely notified the Department of their intent to participate in these reviews: Nation Ford Chemical Company and Sun Chemical Corporation (collectively, Petitioners).3 Petitioners claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of a domestic like product in the United States. On May 1, 2015, we received a complete substantive response for each review from Petitioners within the 30day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no substantive responses from any respondent interested parties. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited sunset reviews of these orders. Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to this AD Order is CVP–23. Imports of merchandise included within the scope of this order are currently classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice, provides a full description of the scope of the order.5 1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004); and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People’s Republic of China, 69 FR 77987 (December 29, 2004). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80 FR 17388 (April 1, 2015). 3 See Letters from Petitioners, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India/Notice of Intent to Participate in Second Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order’’ and ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China/ Notice of Intent to Participate in Second Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order,’’ April 13, 2015. 4 See Letters from Petitioners, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India/Petitioners’ Substantive Response’’ and ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China/Petitioners’ Substantive Response,’’ May 1, 2015. 5 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India and the People’s Republic of China’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 151 (Thursday, August 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46954-46955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-895]


Certain Crepe Paper Products From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On April 1, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') initiated the second five-year (``sunset'') review of 
the antidumping duty order on certain crepe paper products (``crepe 
paper'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\ 
As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation 
of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from the PRC would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels 
indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 17388 
(April 1, 2015).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective date: August 6, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2243.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 1, 2015, the Department published the notice of initiation 
of the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from 
the PRC. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), the Department 
received notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from 
Seaman Paper Company of Massachusetts, Inc. (``Seaman Paper'') within 
15 days after the date of publication of the Initiation Notice and the 
effective date of the initiation of this sunset review.\2\ Seaman Paper 
claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Letter to the Secretary from Seaman Paper, Five-Year 
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Crepe Paper 
Products from the People's Republic of China--Notice of Intent to 
Participate in Review (April 9, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 30, 2015, the Department received an adequate substantive 
response from Seaman Paper within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i).\3\ We received no responses from respondent 
interested parties. As a result, the Department conducted an expedited 
(120-day) sunset review of the order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Letter to the Secretary from Seaman Paper, Five-Year 
Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Crepe Paper 
Products from the People's Republic of China--Substantive Response 
to Notice of Initiation (April 30, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the 
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Crepe Paper Products from the 
People's Republic of China'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul 
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (``Decision 
Memorandum''). The issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include 
the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the 
magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were to be 
revoked. Parties may find a complete discussion of all issues raised in 
the review and the corresponding recommendations in this public 
memorandum which is on file

[[Page 46955]]

electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System 
(``ACCESS''). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. 
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum is available 
directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions 
of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Scope of the Order

    For purposes of the order, the term ``certain crepe paper'' 
includes crepe paper products that have a basis weight not exceeding 29 
grams per square meter prior to being creped and, if appropriate, 
flame-proofed. Crepe paper has a finely wrinkled surface texture and 
typically but not exclusively is treated to be flame-retardant. Crepe 
paper is typically but not exclusively produced as streamers in roll 
form and packaged in plastic bags. Crepe paper may or may not be 
bleached, dye colored, surface-colored, surface decorated or printed, 
glazed, sequined, embossed, die-cut, and/or flame retardant. Subject 
crepe paper may be rolled, flat or folded, and may be packaged by 
banding or wrapping with paper, by placing in plastic bags, and/or by 
placing in boxes for distribution and use by the ultimate consumer. 
Packages of crepe paper subject to the order may consist solely of 
crepe paper of one color and/or style, or may contain multiple colors 
and/or styles. The merchandise subject to the order does not have 
specific classification numbers assigned to them under the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Subject merchandise 
may be under one or more of several different HTSUS subheadings, 
including: 4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; 4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.39; 
4806.40; 4808.30; 4808.90; 4811.90; 4818.90; 4823.90; 9505.90.40. The 
tariff classifications are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.

Final Results of Review

    Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act, we determine that revocation 
of the antidumping duty order on crepe paper from the PRC would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted-
average margins up to 266.83 percent.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return of destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    This sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections 
751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.

    Dated: July 24, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-19355 Filed 8-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.