Frontseating Service Valves From the People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 44031-44033 [2015-17838]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.
The CIT’s July 6, 2015 final judgment
affirming the Department’s
redetermination constitutes a final
decision of the Court that is not in
harmony with the original Amended
Final Determination. This notice is
published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Amended Final Determination
There is now a final court decision
with respect to the Amended Final
Determination as it concerns the eight
separate rate respondents and the PRCwide entity in this matter. For the eight
separate rate respondents, as of the date
of this notice, all eight companies have
received updated cash deposit rates, and
their rates will not change as a result of
this litigation. However, for the PRCwide entity, the Department is
amending the Amended Final
Determination and the revised cash
deposit rate for this entity is as follows:
Exporter
Cash deposit
rate
(percent)
PRC-wide entity ....................
25.62
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 20, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–18214 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Idaho National Laboratory, et al.;
Notice of Consolidated Decision on
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of
Electron Microscope
This is a decision consolidated
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC.
Docket Number: 15–005. Applicant:
Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls,
ID 83415. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI, Czech
Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 80
FR 26896, May 11, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
Docket Number: 15–010. Applicant:
Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer:
JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See
notice at 80 FR 26896, May 11, 2015.
Docket Number: 15–011. Applicant:
University of South Alabama, Mobile,
AL 36688. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Czech
Republic s.r.o., Czech Republic.
Intended Use: See notice at 80 FR
26896, May 11, 2015.
Docket Number: 15–012. Applicant:
Albert Einstein College of Medicine of
Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY 10461.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: See notice at 80 FR
26896, May 11, 2015.
Docket Number: 15–014. Applicant:
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
MD 21218. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 80 FR 26896, May 11,
2015.
Docket Number: 15–016. Applicant:
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
08901. Instrument: LN Microscope.
Manufacturer: Luigs Neumann,
Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 80
FR 26896, May 1, 2015.
Docket Number: 15–017. Applicant:
City University of New York, New York,
NY 10017. Instrument: Electron
Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Japan.
Intended Use: See notice at 80 FR
26896, May 11, 2015.
Docket Number: 15–018. Applicant:
City University of New York, New York,
NY 10017. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Japan. Intended Use: See
notice at 80 FR 26896, May 11, 2015.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as these
instruments are intended to be used,
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign
instrument is an electron microscope
and is intended for research or scientific
educational uses requiring an electron
microscope. We know of no electron
microscope, or any other instrument
suited to these purposes, which was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: July 20, 2015.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–18212 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44031
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–933]
Frontseating Service Valves From the
People’s Republic of China; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
On April 8, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty on frontseating
service valves from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period
of review is April 1, 2013, through April
28, 2014. The review covers one
exporter of the subject merchandise,
Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sanhua’’).
We find that Sanhua made no sales in
the United States at prices below normal
value. None of the interested parties
submitted case or rebuttal briefs.
Therefore, we made no changes to our
margin calculations for Sanhua. The
final weighted-average dumping margin
for this review is listed below in the
section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the
Review.’’
DATES: Effective date: July 24, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4243.
SUMMARY:
Background
On April 8, 2015, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
subject administrative review of the
order.2 At that time, we invited
interested parties to comment on our
preliminary results.
Subsequent to the Preliminary
Results, Sanhua placed comments on
the record concerning the Preliminary
Results 3 in lieu of a case brief. No other
party provided comments on our
Preliminary Results.
1 See Frontseating Service Valves from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014, 80 FR 18811 (April 8, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’).
2 Id.
3 See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service
Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570–
933; Comments by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.
Regarding the Preliminary Results,’’ dated May 8,
2015 (‘‘Sanhua’s Comment Letter’’).
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
44032
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is frontseating service valves,
assembled or unassembled, complete or
incomplete, and certain parts thereof.
Frontseating service valves contain a
sealing surface on the front side of the
valve stem that allows the indoor unit
or outdoor unit to be isolated from the
refrigerant stream when the air
conditioning or refrigeration unit is
being serviced. Frontseating service
valves rely on an elastomer seal when
the stem cap is removed for servicing
and the stem cap metal to metal seat to
create this seal to the atmosphere during
normal operation.
For purposes of the scope, the term
‘‘unassembled’’ frontseating service
valve means a brazed subassembly
requiring any one or more of the
following processes: The insertion of a
valve core pin, the insertion of a valve
stem and/or O ring, the application or
installation of a stem cap, charge port
cap or tube dust cap. The term
‘‘complete’’ frontseating service valve
means a product sold ready for
installation into an air conditioning or
refrigeration unit. The term
‘‘incomplete’’ frontseating service valve
means a product that when sold is in
multiple pieces, sections, subassemblies
or components and is incapable of being
installed into an air conditioning or
refrigeration unit as a single, unified
valve without further assembly.
The major parts or components of
frontseating service valves intended to
be covered by the scope under the term
‘‘certain parts thereof’’ are any brazed
subassembly consisting of any two or
more of the following components: A
valve body, field connection tube,
factory connection tube or valve charge
port. The valve body is a rectangular
block, or brass forging, machined to be
hollow in the interior, with a generally
square shaped seat (bottom of body).
The field connection tube and factory
connection tube consist of copper or
other metallic tubing, cut to length,
shaped and brazed to the valve body in
order to create two ports, the factory
connection tube and the field
connection tube, each on opposite sides
of the valve assembly body. The valve
charge port is a service port via which
a hose connection can be used to charge
or evacuate the refrigerant medium or to
monitor the system pressure for
diagnostic purposes.
The scope includes frontseating
service valves of any size, configuration,
material composition or connection
type. Frontseating service valves are
classified under subheading
8481.80.1095, and also have been
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
classified under subheading
8415.90.80.85, of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). It is possible for
frontseating service valves to be
manufactured out of primary materials
other than copper and brass, in which
case they would be classified under
HTSUS subheadings 8481.80.3040,
8481.80.3090, or 8481.80.5090. In
addition, if unassembled or incomplete
frontseating service valves are imported,
the various parts or components would
be classified under HTSUS subheadings
8481.90.1000, 8481.90.3000, or
8481.90.5000. The HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, but the written
description of the scope of this
proceeding is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
Sanhua noted that the draft
liquidation instructions issued
subsequent to the Preliminary Results
incorrectly identified the importer of
record,4 and requested that the
Department correct its liquidation
instructions accordingly.5 We agree, and
we will revise the final liquidation
instructions to include the correct
importer name.
Final Results of the Review
We determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margin
exists for the period April 1, 2013,
through April 28, 2014:
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Exporter
date of publication of these final results
of review.
We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review for each
individual assessment rate calculated in
the final results of this review that is
above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50
percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate without regard to antidumping
duties any entries for which the
assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less
than 0.50 percent).
Consistent with its assessment
practice in non-market economy
(‘‘NME’’) antidumping cases,7 for entries
that were not reported in the U.S. sales
databases submitted by companies
individually examined during this
review, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
NME-wide rate. In addition, if the
Department determines that an exporter
under review had no shipments of
subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the
NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of
this practice, see NME Antidumping
Proceedings.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because the antidumping duty order
on frontseating service valves from the
PRC has been revoked,8 the Department
will not issue cash deposit instructions
at the conclusion of this administrative
review.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd. .........
0.00
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
Assessment Rates
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
The Department shall determine, and
review period. Failure to comply with
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
this requirement could result in the
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
by this review pursuant to section
duties occurred and the subsequent
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
assessment of double antidumping
351.212(b).6 The final results of this
duties.
review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
Notification to Interested Parties
entries of merchandise covered by the
In accordance with 19 CFR
final results of this review. The
351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as a
Department intends to issue assessment
reminder to parties subject to
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
at 2.
5 Id., at 5.
6 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103
(February 14, 2012).
PO 00000
4 Id.,
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) (‘‘NME
Antidumping Proceedings’’).
8 See Frontseating Service Valves from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset
Review and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order,
79 FR 27573 (May 14, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO. Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
These final results of review and
notice are published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: July 14, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–17838 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE055
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to Two Pier
Maintenance Projects
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; two proposed incidental
harassment authorizations; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS has received two
requests from the U.S. Navy (Navy) for
authorization to take marine mammals
incidental to construction activities as
part of two separate pier maintenance
projects at Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton.
Pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is
requesting comments on its proposal to
issue incidental harassment
authorizations (IHA) to the Navy to
incidentally take marine mammals, by
Level B Harassment only, during the
specified activity.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than August 24,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
applications should be addressed to
Jolie Harrison, Chief, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service. Physical comments
should be sent to 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 and
electronic comments should be sent to
ITP.Laws@noaa.gov.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 Jul 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
Instructions: NMFS is not responsible
for comments sent by any other method,
to any other address or individual, or
received after the end of the comment
period. Comments received
electronically, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 25megabyte file size. Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word or Excel or Adobe PDF
file formats only. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to the
Internet at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental/construction.htm
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben
Laws, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability
An electronic copy of the Navy’s
application and supporting documents,
as well as a list of the references cited
in this document, may be obtained by
visiting the Internet at:
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental/construction.htm. In case of
problems accessing these documents,
please call the contact listed above.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
Pier 6 Maintenance Project
The Navy prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA; 2013) for this project.
We subsequently adopted the EA and
signed our own Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) prior to
issuing the first IHA for this project, in
accordance with NEPA and the
regulations published by the Council on
Environmental Quality. Information in
the Navy’s application, the Navy’s EA,
and this notice collectively provide the
environmental information related to
proposed issuance of this IHA for public
review and comment. All documents are
available at the aforementioned Web
site. We will review all comments
submitted in response to this notice as
we complete the NEPA process,
including a decision of whether to
reaffirm the existing FONSI, prior to a
final decision on the incidental take
authorization request.
Pier 4 Maintenance Project
The Navy prepared an EA to consider
the direct, indirect and cumulative
effects to the human environment
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44033
resulting from the maintenance project.
NMFS has reviewed the EA and believes
it appropriate to adopt the EA in order
to assess the impacts to the human
environment of issuance of an IHA to
the Navy and subsequently sign our
own FONSI. Information in the Navy’s
application, the Navy’s EA, and this
notice collectively provide the
environmental information related to
proposed issuance of this IHA for public
review and comment.
For both proposed IHAs, all
documents are available at the
aforementioned Web site. We will
review all comments submitted in
response to this notice as we complete
the NEPA processes, including a final
decision of whether to reaffirm the
existing FONSI or adopt the Navy’s EA
and sign a FONSI (for the Pier 6 and Pier
4 IHAs, respectively), prior to a final
decision on the incidental take
authorization requests.
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
area, the incidental, but not intentional,
taking of small numbers of marine
mammals, providing that certain
findings are made and the necessary
prescriptions are established.
The incidental taking of small
numbers of marine mammals may be
allowed only if NMFS (through
authority delegated by the Secretary)
finds that the total taking by the
specified activity during the specified
time period will (i) have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s) and (ii)
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant). Further, the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such taking must be set
forth, either in specific regulations or in
an authorization.
The allowance of such incidental
taking under section 101(a)(5)(A), by
harassment, serious injury, death, or a
combination thereof, requires that
regulations be established.
Subsequently, a Letter of Authorization
may be issued pursuant to the
prescriptions established in such
regulations, providing that the level of
taking will be consistent with the
findings made for the total taking
allowable under the specific regulations.
Under section 101(a)(5)(D), NMFS may
authorize such incidental taking by
harassment only, for periods of not more
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44031-44033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17838]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-933]
Frontseating Service Valves From the People's Republic of China;
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 8, 2015, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published the preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty on frontseating service valves from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ The period of review is April
1, 2013, through April 28, 2014. The review covers one exporter of the
subject merchandise, Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd. (``Sanhua''). We find
that Sanhua made no sales in the United States at prices below normal
value. None of the interested parties submitted case or rebuttal
briefs. Therefore, we made no changes to our margin calculations for
Sanhua. The final weighted-average dumping margin for this review is
listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the Review.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Frontseating Service Valves from the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 18811 (April 8, 2015) (``Preliminary
Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective date: July 24, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482-4243.
Background
On April 8, 2015, the Department published the preliminary results
of the subject administrative review of the order.\2\ At that time, we
invited interested parties to comment on our preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsequent to the Preliminary Results, Sanhua placed comments on
the record concerning the Preliminary Results \3\ in lieu of a case
brief. No other party provided comments on our Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See letter from Sanhua, ``Frontseating Service Valves from
the People's Republic of China; A-570-933; Comments by Zhejiang
Sanhua Co., Ltd. Regarding the Preliminary Results,'' dated May 8,
2015 (``Sanhua's Comment Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 44032]]
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is frontseating service
valves, assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete, and certain
parts thereof. Frontseating service valves contain a sealing surface on
the front side of the valve stem that allows the indoor unit or outdoor
unit to be isolated from the refrigerant stream when the air
conditioning or refrigeration unit is being serviced. Frontseating
service valves rely on an elastomer seal when the stem cap is removed
for servicing and the stem cap metal to metal seat to create this seal
to the atmosphere during normal operation.
For purposes of the scope, the term ``unassembled'' frontseating
service valve means a brazed subassembly requiring any one or more of
the following processes: The insertion of a valve core pin, the
insertion of a valve stem and/or O ring, the application or
installation of a stem cap, charge port cap or tube dust cap. The term
``complete'' frontseating service valve means a product sold ready for
installation into an air conditioning or refrigeration unit. The term
``incomplete'' frontseating service valve means a product that when
sold is in multiple pieces, sections, subassemblies or components and
is incapable of being installed into an air conditioning or
refrigeration unit as a single, unified valve without further assembly.
The major parts or components of frontseating service valves
intended to be covered by the scope under the term ``certain parts
thereof'' are any brazed subassembly consisting of any two or more of
the following components: A valve body, field connection tube, factory
connection tube or valve charge port. The valve body is a rectangular
block, or brass forging, machined to be hollow in the interior, with a
generally square shaped seat (bottom of body). The field connection
tube and factory connection tube consist of copper or other metallic
tubing, cut to length, shaped and brazed to the valve body in order to
create two ports, the factory connection tube and the field connection
tube, each on opposite sides of the valve assembly body. The valve
charge port is a service port via which a hose connection can be used
to charge or evacuate the refrigerant medium or to monitor the system
pressure for diagnostic purposes.
The scope includes frontseating service valves of any size,
configuration, material composition or connection type. Frontseating
service valves are classified under subheading 8481.80.1095, and also
have been classified under subheading 8415.90.80.85, of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). It is possible for
frontseating service valves to be manufactured out of primary materials
other than copper and brass, in which case they would be classified
under HTSUS subheadings 8481.80.3040, 8481.80.3090, or 8481.80.5090. In
addition, if unassembled or incomplete frontseating service valves are
imported, the various parts or components would be classified under
HTSUS subheadings 8481.90.1000, 8481.90.3000, or 8481.90.5000. The
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
but the written description of the scope of this proceeding is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
Sanhua noted that the draft liquidation instructions issued
subsequent to the Preliminary Results incorrectly identified the
importer of record,\4\ and requested that the Department correct its
liquidation instructions accordingly.\5\ We agree, and we will revise
the final liquidation instructions to include the correct importer
name.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id., at 2.
\5\ Id., at 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Review
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin
exists for the period April 1, 2013, through April 28, 2014:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.................................... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b).\6\ The final results of
this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties
on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review.
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14,
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review for each individual
assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review that is
above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to
antidumping duties any entries for which the assessment rate is de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent).
Consistent with its assessment practice in non-market economy
(``NME'') antidumping cases,\7\ for entries that were not reported in
the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined
during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines
that an exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise,
any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number
(i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the NME-wide
rate. For a full discussion of this practice, see NME Antidumping
Proceedings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011)
(``NME Antidumping Proceedings'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because the antidumping duty order on frontseating service valves
from the PRC has been revoked,\8\ the Department will not issue cash
deposit instructions at the conclusion of this administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Frontseating Service Valves from the People's Republic
of China: Final Results of Sunset Review and Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 27573 (May 14, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as a
reminder to parties subject to
[[Page 44033]]
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
the APO. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
These final results of review and notice are published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 14, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-17838 Filed 7-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P