Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From China and India; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews, 43119-43120 [2015-17781]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 139 / Tuesday, July 21, 2015 / Notices
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it will proceed with full
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘The Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the countervailing duty
order on polyethylene retail carrier bags
from Vietnam and revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on
polyethylene retail carrier bags from
China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan,
Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. A schedule for the
reviews will be established and
announced at a later date.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathanael Comly (202–205–3174),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
For further information concerning
the conduct of this proceeding and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6,
2015, the Commission determined that
it should proceed to full reviews in the
subject five-year reviews pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission
found that the domestic interested party
group response to its notice of
institution (80 FR 17490, April 1, 2015)
and the respondent interested party
group response with respect to the order
on Malaysia were adequate. The
Commission determined that it will
proceed to a full review of the order on
Malaysia. The Commission also found
that the respondent interested party
group responses with respect to the
orders on China, Indonesia, Taiwan,
Thailand, and Vietnam were
inadequate. The Commission further
determined that it will proceed to full
reviews of the orders on China,
Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
Vietnam to promote administrative
efficiency in light of its decision to
proceed to a full review with respect to
the order on Malaysia. A record of the
Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements will be available from the
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 15, 2015.
Jennifer Rohrbach,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2015–17773 Filed 7–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–437 and 731–
TA–1060–1061 (Second Review)]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
China and India; Scheduling of
Expedited Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty and
countervailing duty orders on carbazole
violet pigment 23 from China and India
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Trainor ((202) 205–3354), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43119
Background. On July 6, 2015, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (80
FR 17499, April 1, 2015) of the subject
five-year reviews was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
responses were inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Staff report. A staff report containing
information concerning the subject
matter of these reviews will be placed
in the nonpublic record on August 20,
2015, and made available to persons on
the Administrative Protective Order
service list for these reviews. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions. As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to these reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in these
reviews. Comments are due on or before
August 25, 2015 and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to these reviews
by August 25, 2015. However, should
the Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its reviews, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Nation Ford Chemical Co. and Sun
Chemical Corp. to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
43120
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 139 / Tuesday, July 21, 2015 / Notices
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. Please be aware that the
Commission’s rules with respect to
filing have changed. The most recent
amendments took effect on July 25,
2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014),
and the revised Commission Handbook
on E-filing, available from the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the reviews must be
served on all other parties to the reviews
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination. The Commission has
determined these reviews are
extraordinarily complicated and
therefore has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by
up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 15, 2015.
Jennifer Rohrbach,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2015–17781 Filed 7–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D).
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Trade
Adjustment Assistance Community
College and Career Training Grants
Round Four Evaluation
Notice.
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting the information
collection request (ICR) proposal titled,
‘‘Trade Adjustment Assistance
Community College and Career Training
Grants Round Four Evaluation,’’ to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval for use
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). Public comments on the
ICR are invited.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 20, 2015
This ICR
seeks PRA authority for the Trade
Adjustment Assistance Community
College and Career Training
(TAAACCCT) Grants Round Four
Evaluation information collection. The
fourth round of the TAACCCT grants
program continues to provide
community colleges and other eligible
institutions of higher education with
funds to expand and improve their
ability to deliver education and career
training programs that can be completed
in two years or less and are suited for
workers who are eligible for training
under the Trade Adjustment Assistance
for Workers program. The Round 4
evaluation will include an impact study
involving random assignment and an
implementation analysis. This ICR
requests clearance for (1) collecting
baseline information on participants of
interventions in the Round 4 grantees
selected for the impact study and (2)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Office of the Secretary
ACTION:
The OMB will consider all
written comments that agency receives
on or before August 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with
applicable supporting documentation;
including a description of the likely
respondents, proposed frequency of
response, and estimated total burden
may be obtained free of charge from the
RegInfo.gov Web site at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201505-1291-001
(this link will only become active on the
day following publication of this notice)
or by contacting Michel Smyth by
telephone at 202–693–4129 (this is not
a toll-free number) or by email at DOL_
PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.
Submit comments about this request
by mail or courier to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL–
OASAM, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street
NW., Washington, DC 20503; by Fax:
202–395–5806 (this is not a toll-free
number); or by email: OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov. Commenters
are encouraged, but not required, to
send a courtesy copy of any comments
by mail or courier to the U.S.
Department of Labor-OASAM, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Attn:
Departmental Information Compliance
Management Program, Room N1301,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; or by email:
DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at
202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free
number) or by email at DOL_PRA_
PUBLIC@dol.gov.
DATES:
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
semi-structured fieldwork in the form of
site visits to up to nine Round 4
grantees to learn from college
administrators, program coordinators,
faculty and instructional staff, industry
and community partners, and
employers. American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 section 801
authorizes this information collection.
This proposed information collection
is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency
generally cannot conduct or sponsor a
collection of information, and the public
is generally not required to respond to
an information collection, unless it is
approved by the OMB under the PRA
and displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number. In addition,
notwithstanding any other provisions of
law, no person shall generally be subject
to penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information if the
collection of information does not
display a valid Control Number. See 5
CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. For
additional information, see the related
notice published in the Federal Register
on February 26, 2015 (80 FR 10515).
Interested parties are encouraged to
send comments to the OMB, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs at
the address shown in the ADDRESSES
section within thirty (30) days of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. In order to help ensure
appropriate consideration, comments
should mention OMB ICR Reference
Number 201505–1291–001. The OMB is
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: DOL–OASP.
Title of Collection: Trade Adjustment
Assistance Community College and
Career Training Grants Round Four
Evaluation.
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43119-43120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17781]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Second Review)]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From China and India; Scheduling of
Expedited Five-Year Reviews
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing
duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 from China and India would
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Trainor ((202) 205-3354),
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On July 6, 2015, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(80 FR 17499, April 1, 2015) of the subject five-year reviews was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group responses were
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that
would warrant conducting full reviews.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section
751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201),
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Staff report. A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of these reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record
on August 20, 2015, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will
be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission's rules.
Written submissions. As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to these
reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party
to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in these reviews. Comments
are due on or before August 25, 2015 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement
(which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to
these reviews by August 25, 2015. However, should the Department of
Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results
of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce's final results is three business days
after the issuance of Commerce's results. If
[[Page 43120]]
comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must
conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of
the Commission's rules. Please be aware that the Commission's rules
with respect to filing have changed. The most recent amendments took
effect on July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014), and the
revised Commission Handbook on E-filing, available from the
Commission's Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by Nation
Ford Chemical Co. and Sun Chemical Corp. to be individually
adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination. The Commission has determined these reviews are
extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise
its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 15, 2015.
Jennifer Rohrbach,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2015-17781 Filed 7-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P