Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews, 43118-43119 [2015-17773]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
43118
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 139 / Tuesday, July 21, 2015 / Notices
FEIS. Public comments resulted in the
addition of clarifying text, but did not
change any of the impact analyses or
significance determinations.
In addition, the FEIS includes updates
based on evolving regulatory guidance
and completion of the Section 106 and
Section 7 consultation processes.
The EPA published the Notice of
Availability of the Final Environmental
Impact Statement in the Federal
Register by the OSMRE (80 FR 24965)
on May 1, 2015. Printed and CD copies
of the Draft EIS and Final EIS are
available at the same locations as listed
in ADDRESSES above. The ROD
conditions OSMRE, BIA and BLM’s
approval on all mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIS and
additional mitigation measures
identified in the Final Biological
Opinion and the ROD.
Because BIA’s and BLM’s decision is
approved by the Secretary of the
Interior, it is not subject to
administrative appeal in accordance
with the regulations at 43 CFR
4.410(a)(3). Any challenges to BIA &
BLM’s decisions, must be brought in
federal district court. OSMRE’s
decisions may be appealed by a person
with an interest which is or may be
adversely affected under the procedures
set forth in 30 CFR 775 and 43 CFR
part 4.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10
Dated: July 15, 2015.
Joseph G. Pizarchik,
Director, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015–17881 Filed 7–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1070A (Second
Review)]
Crepe Paper From China; Scheduling
of an Expedited Five-Year Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on crepe paper from China would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Haberstroh, (202) 205–3390,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On July 6, 2015, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (80
FR 17499, April 1, 2015) of the subject
five-year review was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 2
Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct an
expedited review pursuant to section
751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on
August 3, 2015, and made available to
persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this
review. A public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to section
207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution, and any party other
than an interested party to the review
may file written comments with the
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 Chairman Meredith M. Broadbent and
Commissioner F. Scott Kieff voted to conduct a full
review.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before August
6, 2015 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither
a party to the five-year review nor an
interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the review by August 6,
2015. However, should the Department
of Commerce extend the time limit for
its completion of the final results of its
review, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. Please be aware that the
Commission’s rules with respect to
filing have changed. The most recent
amendments took effect on July 25,
2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014),
and the revised Commission Handbook
on E-filing, available from the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 15, 2015.
Jennifer Rohrbach,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2015–17741 Filed 7–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–462 and 731–
TA–1156–1158 (First Review) and 731–TA–
1043–1045 (Second Review)]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From
China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan,
Thailand, and Vietnam; Notice of
Commission Determination To
Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 139 / Tuesday, July 21, 2015 / Notices
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it will proceed with full
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘The Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the countervailing duty
order on polyethylene retail carrier bags
from Vietnam and revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on
polyethylene retail carrier bags from
China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan,
Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. A schedule for the
reviews will be established and
announced at a later date.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathanael Comly (202–205–3174),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
For further information concerning
the conduct of this proceeding and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6,
2015, the Commission determined that
it should proceed to full reviews in the
subject five-year reviews pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission
found that the domestic interested party
group response to its notice of
institution (80 FR 17490, April 1, 2015)
and the respondent interested party
group response with respect to the order
on Malaysia were adequate. The
Commission determined that it will
proceed to a full review of the order on
Malaysia. The Commission also found
that the respondent interested party
group responses with respect to the
orders on China, Indonesia, Taiwan,
Thailand, and Vietnam were
inadequate. The Commission further
determined that it will proceed to full
reviews of the orders on China,
Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
Vietnam to promote administrative
efficiency in light of its decision to
proceed to a full review with respect to
the order on Malaysia. A record of the
Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements will be available from the
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 15, 2015.
Jennifer Rohrbach,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2015–17773 Filed 7–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–437 and 731–
TA–1060–1061 (Second Review)]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
China and India; Scheduling of
Expedited Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty and
countervailing duty orders on carbazole
violet pigment 23 from China and India
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Trainor ((202) 205–3354), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43119
Background. On July 6, 2015, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (80
FR 17499, April 1, 2015) of the subject
five-year reviews was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
responses were inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Staff report. A staff report containing
information concerning the subject
matter of these reviews will be placed
in the nonpublic record on August 20,
2015, and made available to persons on
the Administrative Protective Order
service list for these reviews. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions. As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to these reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in these
reviews. Comments are due on or before
August 25, 2015 and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to these reviews
by August 25, 2015. However, should
the Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its reviews, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Nation Ford Chemical Co. and Sun
Chemical Corp. to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43118-43119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17773]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-462 and 731-TA-1156-1158 (First Review) and
731-TA-1043-1045 (Second Review)]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From China, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam; Notice of Commission Determination To
Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 43119]]
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with
full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``The Act'') to
determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on
polyethylene retail carrier bags from Vietnam and revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China,
Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be
established and announced at a later date.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathanael Comly (202-205-3174), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
proceeding may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
For further information concerning the conduct of this proceeding
and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6, 2015, the Commission determined
that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)). The Commission found that the domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (80 FR 17490, April 1, 2015) and
the respondent interested party group response with respect to the
order on Malaysia were adequate. The Commission determined that it will
proceed to a full review of the order on Malaysia. The Commission also
found that the respondent interested party group responses with respect
to the orders on China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam were
inadequate. The Commission further determined that it will proceed to
full reviews of the orders on China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and
Vietnam to promote administrative efficiency in light of its decision
to proceed to a full review with respect to the order on Malaysia. A
record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on
adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web
site.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 15, 2015.
Jennifer Rohrbach,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2015-17773 Filed 7-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
