Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Second Amended Final Results of Administrative Review Pursuant to Court Decision, 42086-42087 [2015-17486]

Download as PDF 42086 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 2015 / Notices number five minutes prior to the start of the conference call and provide the confirmation number. The phone number is: 1–877–691–2551 (U.S. Toll Free), or 1–630–691–2747 (U.S. Toll), with confirmation number: 40238148. The CSB is an independent federal agency charged with investigating accidents and hazards that result, or may result, in the catastrophic release of extremely hazardous substances. The agency’s Board Members are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. CSB investigations look into all aspects of chemical accidents and hazards, including physical causes such as equipment failure as well as inadequacies in regulations, industry standards, and safety management systems. Public Comment The time provided for public statements will depend upon the number of people who wish to speak. Speakers should assume that their presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, but commenters may submit written statements for the record. Contact Person for Further Information Hillary J. Cohen, Communications Manager, hillary.cohen@csb.gov or (202) 446–8094. Further information about this public meeting can be found on the CSB Web site at: www.csb.gov. Dated: July 13, 2015. Rick Engler, Board Member. [FR Doc. 2015–17581 Filed 7–14–15; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 6350–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–601] Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Second Amended Final Results of Administrative Review Pursuant to Court Decision Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 16, 2015, the United States Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’) issued its final judgment vacating its decision in Peer Bearing Co.—Changshan v. United States, 853 F. Supp. 2d 1365 (CIT 2013) (‘‘CPZ II’’), tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Jul 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 and re-instating the Department of Commerce’s (the ‘‘Department’’) first redetermination issued on remand (‘‘First Remand Redetermination’’) 1 with respect to the Department’s final results of the 2006–2007 antidumping duty administrative review of tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished from the People’s Republic of China.2 Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department’s amended final results of review 3 and is amending the Amended Final Results of review with respect to the margin determined for Peer Bearing Company— Changshan (‘‘CPZ’’), an exporter and producer of subject merchandise. DATES: Effective Date: June 26, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brendan Quinn, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5848. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Subsequent to the publication of the Final Results, CPZ filed a complaint with the CIT challenging the methodology used to determine its margin in the Final Results. On January 28, 2011, the CIT issued a remand order to the Department, instructing it, among other things, to: (1) Redetermine the margin for CPZ based on redetermined U.S. prices of CPZ’s subject merchandise that are calculated according to a method that complies with law; and (2) review, reconsider, and redetermine the surrogate values for alloy steel wire rod, alloy steel bar, and May 23, 2011, the Department issued its Draft Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, and on July 1, 2011, it issued its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand (July 1, 2011). 2 See Peer Bearing Co.—Changshan v. United States, Court No. 09–00052, Slip Op. 15–61 (CIT 2015) (‘‘CIT’s Final Order’’). 3 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 3987 (January 22, 2009) (‘‘Final Results’’), as amended, Tapered Roller Bearings from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Administrative Review, 78 FR 58996 (September 25, 2013) (‘‘Amended Final Results’’). PO 00000 1 On Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 scrap from the production of cages.4 On July 1, 2011, the Department issued its First Remand Redetermination. On August 2, 2012, the CIT issued its decision in CPZ II,5 setting aside the Department’s First Remand Redetermination as contrary to law; and instructing it to prepare a second remand redetermination to: (1) Determine the U.S. prices for CPZ’s subject merchandise according to a lawful method and in accordance with the CIT’s current and prior opinion and orders in this case; and, (2) review, reconsider, and redetermine the surrogate values for alloy steel wire rod, alloy steel bar, and scrap from the production of cages in accordance with the CIT’s prior opinion and order in this case. The Department issued its draft remand results on September 7, 2012, and its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand on October 2, 2012 (‘‘Second Remand Redetermination’’). On August 30, 2013, the CIT sustained the Department’s Second Remand Redetermination (‘‘CPZ III’’).6 The Department accordingly amended its Final Results effective September 9, 2013.7 The Timken Company (‘‘Timken’’), an intervening domestic bearing producer, and petitioner in the underlying investigation, appealed the CIT’s decision to the CAFC. On September 12, 2014, the CAFC ruled that the Department’s application of adverse facts available in its First Remand Redetermination was supported by substantial evidence.8 As a consequence, it vacated the CIT’s decision in CPZ III and ruled that on remand, the CIT should reinstate the Department’s application of adverse facts available and its calculation of CPZ’s margin in its First Remand Redetermination.9 As noted above, on June 15, 2015, the CIT issued its final judgment vacating its decision in CPZ II and re-instating the Department’s First Remand Redetermination.10 Timken Notice In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department 4 See Peer Bearing Co.—Changshan v. United States, 752 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (CIT 2011) (‘‘CPZ I’’). 5 See CPZ II. 6 Peer Bearing Co.—Changshan v. United States, Court No. 09–00052, Slip. Op. 13–116 (CIT 2013) (‘‘CPZ III’’) 7 See Amended Final Results. 8 See Peer Bearing Co.—Changshan v. United States, 766 F.3d 1396, 1401 (CAFC 2014). 9 Id., at 1401. 10 See CIT’s Final Order. E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM 16JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 2015 / Notices must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s June 16, 2015, judgment in this case constitutes a final decision of that court that is not in harmony with the Department’s Amended Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Amended Final Results Because there is now a final court decision with respect to this case, the Department is amending the Amended Final Results with respect to CPZ’s weighted-average dumping margin, effective June 26, 2015. The revised dumping margin is as follows: Percent margin Exporter Peer Bearing Company Changshan (‘‘CPZ’’) .................. 60.95 In the event the CIT’s ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by the CAFC, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to liquidate entries of subject merchandise based on the revised assessment rates calculated by the Department. Cash Deposit Requirements Since the Final Results, in September 2008, CPZ was acquired by AB SKF, and the Department determined via a successor-in-interest analysis that the post-acquisition, SKF-owned entity, Changshan Peer Bearing was not the successor in interest of CPZ.11 As a consequence, CPZ no longer exists, and its cash deposit rate does not need to be updated as a result of these second amended final results. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 9, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [FR Doc. 2015–17486 Filed 7–15–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 11 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the 2008–2009 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 3086 (January 19, 2011). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Jul 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XE038 Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings and Hearings National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of a public work session. AGENCY: NMFS has reinitiated consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on the effects to listed Pacific salmon species from implementation of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan. NMFS announces a public work session for interested stakeholders to provide input relative to managing the impacts to salmon from the groundfish fisheries. NMFS is seeking information on the amount and distribution of salmon bycatch, salmon bycatch management in the different sectors of the groundfish fishery, and whether stakeholders anticipate changes in fishing strategies or target species over the next few years that could alter the amount and distribution of salmon bycatch. NMFS and the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will consider the information discussed at the work session in developing and evaluating the proposed action for the ESA consultation. DATES: The work session will be held as a Webinar on Wednesday July 29, 2015 from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, or until business for the day has been completed. Written comments will also be accepted via email. To be considered in the work session report to the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council), email comments must be received no later than noon August 7, 2015. ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted via email to GroundfishBO2015.wcr@noaa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Persons who wish to receive further information about the work session or have questions about this notice should contact Kevin Duffy at kevin.duffy@ noaa.gov or Becky Renko at becky.renko@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: General a. How may I participate in this webinar? To join the Webinar visit this Internet link: www.gotomeeting.com/ online/webinar/join-webinar and enter PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 42087 the Webinar ID: 110–773–275. Your name and email address are required. To join the audio, participants can use their computer’s microphone and speakers (VoIP) or use their telephone: Toll: +1 (415) 655–0059; Attendee Access Code: 227–478–994. The Audio Pin will be shown after joining the webinar. System Requirements for participation: For PC-based attendees the system requires Windows® 7, Vista, or XP; for Mac®-based attendees the system requires Mac OS® X 10.5 or newer; for Mobile attendees the system requires iPhone®, iPad®, AndroidTM phone or Android tablet. b. How can I get a copy of the webinar materials? The Webinar will be based on documents that are available online in the Council’s June 2015 briefing book under agenda item D.3. The relevant briefing book materials include: • NMFS report 1 on to salmon bycatch in the groundfish fishery • NMFS report 2, the 2006 supplemental biological opinion, • NMFS supplemental powerpoint The Council’s June 2015 briefing book document is available on line at www.pcouncil.org/resources/archives/ briefing-books/june-2015-briefing-book/ #gfJun2015. c. What if I cannot attend this Webinar? A video presentation will be available online at www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/ fisheries/groundfish/. Interested persons are welcome to watch the online video presentation and submit written comments by email to GroundfishBO2015.wcr@noaa.gov by noon August 7, 2015. Background The groundfish fishery is a yearround, multi-species fishery occurring off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California. Salmon are encountered as bycatch by vessels fishing for groundfish. NMFS is in the process of evaluating the groundfish fishery’s interaction with salmon, including ESAlisted salmon. The purpose of the Webinar is to engage with stakeholders and management entities on information relative to managing impacts to salmon from the groundfish fisheries. On January 22, 2013, the NMFS West Coast Region’s Sustainable Fisheries Division requested reinitiation of ESA section 7 consultation addressing the groundfish fishery’s effects on ESAlisted salmon. The request was based on the evolution of the shorebased trawl fishery under the trawl rationalization framework, and new estimates of Chinook and coho salmon catch in the nearshore fixed gear fisheries (open E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM 16JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42086-42087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17486]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-601]


Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court 
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and 
Notice of Second Amended Final Results of Administrative Review 
Pursuant to Court Decision

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 16, 2015, the United States Court of International 
Trade (``CIT'') issued its final judgment vacating its decision in Peer 
Bearing Co.--Changshan v. United States, 853 F. Supp. 2d 1365 (CIT 
2013) (``CPZ II''), and re-instating the Department of Commerce's (the 
``Department'') first redetermination issued on remand (``First Remand 
Redetermination'') \1\ with respect to the Department's final results 
of the 2006-2007 antidumping duty administrative review of tapered 
roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished from the 
People's Republic of China.\2\ Consistent with the decision of the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') in 
Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 
(``Timken''), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. 
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (``Diamond Sawblades''), 
the Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this 
case is not in harmony with the Department's amended final results of 
review \3\ and is amending the Amended Final Results of review with 
respect to the margin determined for Peer Bearing Company--Changshan 
(``CPZ''), an exporter and producer of subject merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On May 23, 2011, the Department issued its Draft Results of 
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, and on July 1, 2011, it 
issued its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand (July 
1, 2011).
    \2\ See Peer Bearing Co.--Changshan v. United States, Court No. 
09-00052, Slip Op. 15-61 (CIT 2015) (``CIT's Final Order'').
    \3\ See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 3987 (January 22, 
2009) (``Final Results''), as amended, Tapered Roller Bearings from 
the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in 
Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of 
Amended Final Results of Administrative Review, 78 FR 58996 
(September 25, 2013) (``Amended Final Results'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 26, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brendan Quinn, Office III, Enforcement 
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-5848.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Subsequent to the publication of the Final 
Results, CPZ filed a complaint with the CIT challenging the methodology 
used to determine its margin in the Final Results.
    On January 28, 2011, the CIT issued a remand order to the 
Department, instructing it, among other things, to: (1) Redetermine the 
margin for CPZ based on redetermined U.S. prices of CPZ's subject 
merchandise that are calculated according to a method that complies 
with law; and (2) review, reconsider, and redetermine the surrogate 
values for alloy steel wire rod, alloy steel bar, and scrap from the 
production of cages.\4\ On July 1, 2011, the Department issued its 
First Remand Redetermination. On August 2, 2012, the CIT issued its 
decision in CPZ II,\5\ setting aside the Department's First Remand 
Redetermination as contrary to law; and instructing it to prepare a 
second remand redetermination to: (1) Determine the U.S. prices for 
CPZ's subject merchandise according to a lawful method and in 
accordance with the CIT's current and prior opinion and orders in this 
case; and, (2) review, reconsider, and redetermine the surrogate values 
for alloy steel wire rod, alloy steel bar, and scrap from the 
production of cages in accordance with the CIT's prior opinion and 
order in this case. The Department issued its draft remand results on 
September 7, 2012, and its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to 
Court Remand on October 2, 2012 (``Second Remand Redetermination''). On 
August 30, 2013, the CIT sustained the Department's Second Remand 
Redetermination (``CPZ III'').\6\ The Department accordingly amended 
its Final Results effective September 9, 2013.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Peer Bearing Co.--Changshan v. United States, 752 F. 
Supp. 2d 1353 (CIT 2011) (``CPZ I'').
    \5\ See CPZ II.
    \6\ Peer Bearing Co.--Changshan v. United States, Court No. 09-
00052, Slip. Op. 13-116 (CIT 2013) (``CPZ III'')
    \7\ See Amended Final Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Timken Company (``Timken''), an intervening domestic bearing 
producer, and petitioner in the underlying investigation, appealed the 
CIT's decision to the CAFC. On September 12, 2014, the CAFC ruled that 
the Department's application of adverse facts available in its First 
Remand Redetermination was supported by substantial evidence.\8\ As a 
consequence, it vacated the CIT's decision in CPZ III and ruled that on 
remand, the CIT should reinstate the Department's application of 
adverse facts available and its calculation of CPZ's margin in its 
First Remand Redetermination.\9\ As noted above, on June 15, 2015, the 
CIT issued its final judgment vacating its decision in CPZ II and re-
instating the Department's First Remand Redetermination.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Peer Bearing Co.--Changshan v. United States, 766 F.3d 
1396, 1401 (CAFC 2014).
    \9\ Id., at 1401.
    \10\ See CIT's Final Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades, the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department

[[Page 42087]]

must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' 
with a Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries 
pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's June 16, 2015, 
judgment in this case constitutes a final decision of that court that 
is not in harmony with the Department's Amended Final Results. This 
notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of 
Timken.

Amended Final Results

    Because there is now a final court decision with respect to this 
case, the Department is amending the Amended Final Results with respect 
to CPZ's weighted-average dumping margin, effective June 26, 2015. The 
revised dumping margin is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
                           Exporter                              margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peer Bearing Company Changshan (``CPZ'').....................      60.95
------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld 
by the CAFC, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to liquidate entries of subject merchandise based on the 
revised assessment rates calculated by the Department.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Since the Final Results, in September 2008, CPZ was acquired by AB 
SKF, and the Department determined via a successor-in-interest analysis 
that the post-acquisition, SKF-owned entity, Changshan Peer Bearing was 
not the successor in interest of CPZ.\11\ As a consequence, CPZ no 
longer exists, and its cash deposit rate does not need to be updated as 
a result of these second amended final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 
Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
the 2008-2009 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 3086 
(January 19, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: July 9, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-17486 Filed 7-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.