Notice of a Commission Determination not to Review an Initial Determination Terminating Investigation as to Federal-Mogul Respondents Based on a Settlement Agreement, 38464 [2015-16436]

Download as PDF 38464 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 128 / Monday, July 6, 2015 / Notices Dated: May 27, 2015. Sue E. Masica, Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 2015–16475 Filed 7–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–CB–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof [Investigation No. 337–TA–928 and Investigation No. 337–TA–937 (Consolidated)] Notice of a Commission Determination not to Review an Initial Determination Terminating Investigation as to Federal-Mogul Respondents Based on a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 24) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation as to Federal-Mogul respondents based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3115. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Investigation No. 337–TA–928, Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), on September 2, 2014, based on Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:37 Jul 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 a complaint filed by Valeo North America, Inc. of Troy, MI, and Delmex de Juarez S. de R.L. de C.V. of Mexico (collectively, ‘‘Valeo’’). The complaint alleges a violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,891,044 (‘‘the ‘044 patent’’); 7,937,798 (‘‘the ‘798 patent’’); and 8,220,106 by Federal-Mogul Corp. of Southfield, Michigan; Federal-Mogul Vehicle Component Solutions, Inc. of Southfield, Michigan; and FederalMogul S.A. of Aubange, Belgium (collectively, ‘‘Federal-Mogul’’). 79 FR 52041–42 (Sep. 2, 2014). On November 21, 2014, the Commission instituted Investigation No. 337–TA–937, Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof, based on a separate complaint filed by Valeo. The complaint alleges a violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of the ‘044 patent and the ‘798 patent by Trico Products Corporation of Rochester Hills, Michigan, Trico Products of Brownsville, Texas; and Trico Componentes SA de CV of Tamaulipas, Mexico. 79 FR 69525–26 (Nov. 21, 2014). On December 9, 2014, the ALJ consolidated Investigation Nos. 337– TA–928 and 337–TA–937. See ALJ Order No. 8 in the investigation 337– TA–928. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations does not participate as a party in these consolidated investigations. On May 19, 2015, complainants Valeo and respondents Federal-Mogul, inter alia, filed a joint motion pursuant to 19 CFR 210.21(a)(2) and (b) to terminate by settlement the Federal-Mogul respondents. No responses were filed. On June 5, 2015, the ALJ issued Order No. 24 in which he, inter alia, granted the joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondents FederalMogul based on a settlement agreement. This portion of Order No. 24 represents the subject ID. The ALJ found that the joint motion complies with the Commission Rules, and that termination of the investigation as to Federal-Mogul is in the public interest and will conserve public and private resources. No party petitioned for review of Order No. 24, and the Commission has determined not to review it. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). PO 00000 By order of the Commission. Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Issued: June 29, 2015. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–16436 Filed 7–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–776–779 (Third Review)] Preserved Mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia; Scheduling of expedited five-year reviews United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on preserved mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES: Effective Date: June 5, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanna Lo (202–205–1888), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background. On June 5, 2015, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (80 FR 11221, March 2, 2015) of the subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, SUMMARY: 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 38464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16436]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof

[Investigation No. 337-TA-928 and Investigation No. 337-TA-937 
(Consolidated)]


Notice of a Commission Determination not to Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating Investigation as to Federal-Mogul Respondents 
Based on a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 24) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') terminating the investigation as to Federal-Mogul respondents 
based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Investigation No. 
337-TA-928, Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof, under 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 
(``section 337''), on September 2, 2014, based on a complaint filed by 
Valeo North America, Inc. of Troy, MI, and Delmex de Juarez S. de R.L. 
de C.V. of Mexico (collectively, ``Valeo''). The complaint alleges a 
violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of 
U.S. Patent Nos. 7,891,044 (``the `044 patent''); 7,937,798 (``the `798 
patent''); and 8,220,106 by Federal-Mogul Corp. of Southfield, 
Michigan; Federal-Mogul Vehicle Component Solutions, Inc. of 
Southfield, Michigan; and Federal-Mogul S.A. of Aubange, Belgium 
(collectively, ``Federal-Mogul''). 79 FR 52041-42 (Sep. 2, 2014).
    On November 21, 2014, the Commission instituted Investigation No. 
337-TA-937, Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof, based on 
a separate complaint filed by Valeo. The complaint alleges a violation 
of section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of the `044 
patent and the `798 patent by Trico Products Corporation of Rochester 
Hills, Michigan, Trico Products of Brownsville, Texas; and Trico 
Componentes SA de CV of Tamaulipas, Mexico. 79 FR 69525-26 (Nov. 21, 
2014).
    On December 9, 2014, the ALJ consolidated Investigation Nos. 337-
TA-928 and 337-TA-937. See ALJ Order No. 8 in the investigation 337-TA-
928. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations does not participate as 
a party in these consolidated investigations.
    On May 19, 2015, complainants Valeo and respondents Federal-Mogul, 
inter alia, filed a joint motion pursuant to 19 CFR 210.21(a)(2) and 
(b) to terminate by settlement the Federal-Mogul respondents. No 
responses were filed.
    On June 5, 2015, the ALJ issued Order No. 24 in which he, inter 
alia, granted the joint motion to terminate the investigation as to 
respondents Federal-Mogul based on a settlement agreement. This portion 
of Order No. 24 represents the subject ID. The ALJ found that the joint 
motion complies with the Commission Rules, and that termination of the 
investigation as to Federal-Mogul is in the public interest and will 
conserve public and private resources. No party petitioned for review 
of Order No. 24, and the Commission has determined not to review it.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: June 29, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-16436 Filed 7-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P