Barium Chloride From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 36973-36974 [2015-15903]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Notices
publicly or under an administrative
protective order, without the written
consent of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
In accordance with section 705(b)(2)
of the Act, if our final determination is
affirmative, the ITC will make its final
determination within 45 days after the
Department makes its final
determination.
This determination is issued and
published pursuant to sections 703(f)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: June 22, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix 1—Scope of the Investigation
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The merchandise covered by this
investigation includes uncoated paper in
sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per
square meter but not more than 150 grams
per square meter; that either is a white paper
with a GE brightness level 1 of 85 or higher
or is a colored paper; whether or not surfacedecorated, printed (except as described
below), embossed, perforated, or punched;
irrespective of the smoothness of the surface;
and irrespective of dimensions (Certain
Uncoated Paper).
Certain Uncoated Paper includes (a)
uncoated free sheet paper that meets this
scope definition; (b) uncoated groundwood
paper produced from bleached chemithermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets
this scope definition; and (c) any other
uncoated paper that meets this scope
definition regardless of the type of pulp used
to produce the paper.
Specifically excluded from the scope are
(1) paper printed with final content of
printed text or graphics and (2) lined paper
products, typically school supplies,
composed of paper that incorporates straight
horizontal and/or vertical lines that would
make the paper unsuitable for copying or
printing purposes.
Imports of the subject merchandise are
provided for under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
categories 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000,
4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000,
4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000,
4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and
4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject
merchandise may also be classified under
4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000,
4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040,
4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000,
4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While
1 One of the key measurements of any grade of
paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter
the paper the better the contrast between the paper
and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE
Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of
light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest
reflection, or what would be given to a totally black
grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade.
‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition
means a paper with a hue other than white that
reflects one of the primary colors of magenta,
yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a
combination of such primary colors.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Jun 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
Appendix 2—List of Topics Discussed
in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Alignment
4. Scope Comments
5. Scope of the Investigation
6. Injury Test
7. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inference
8. Subsidies Valuation
9. Analysis of Programs
10. ITC Notification
11. Disclosure and Public Comment
12. Verification
13. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2015–15901 Filed 6–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–007]
Barium Chloride From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
On May 1, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) initiated the fourth fiveyear (‘‘sunset’’) review of the
antidumping duty order on barium
chloride from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1 As a result of this
sunset review, the Department finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on barium chloride from the PRC
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review’’ section of this notice.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: June 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–6905.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
FR 24900 (May 1, 2015).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36973
Background
On June 1, 2015, the Department
received an adequate substantive
response from domestic interested party
Chemical Products Corporation
(‘‘Petitioner’’) within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).2
We received no responses from
respondent interested parties. As a
result, the Department conducted an
expedited (120-day) sunset review of the
order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review
are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the
Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Barium
Chloride from the People’s Republic of
China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted
by, this notice (‘‘Decision
Memorandum’’). The issues discussed
in the Decision Memorandum include
the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the order were to be revoked.
Parties may find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in the review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
Access to ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision
Memorandum is available directly on
the Web at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is barium chloride, a chemical
compound having the formulas BaCl2 or
BaCl2–2H2O, currently classifiable
under item number 2827.39.45.00 of the
2 See Petitioner’s June 1, 2015, submission, re;
‘‘Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation of
Five-Year Review of Chemical Products
Corporation.’’
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
36974
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Notices
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).3
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act,
we determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on barium
chloride from the PRC would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at weighted average margins
up to 155.50 percent.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return of
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This sunset review and notice are in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 23, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–15903 Filed 6–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD969
Stock Status Determination for Atlantic
Highly Migratory Atlantic Smooth
Dogfish Shark and the Gulf of Mexico
Smoothhound Sharks Complex
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This action serves as a notice
that NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary), has determined
that the Atlantic smooth dogfish shark
(Mustelus canis) and the Gulf of Mexico
smoothhound shark complex, which is
comprised of Atlantic smooth dogfish,
Florida smoothhound (M. norrisi), and
Gulf smoothhound (M.
sinusmexicanus), are not overfished and
overfishing is not occurring.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
3 The scope reflects the HTSUS item number
currently in effect. The full scope of the order is
provided in the Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Jun 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
Andrew Rubin or Karyl Brewster-Geisz
by phone at 301–427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Atlantic smooth dogfish, Florida
smoothhound, and Gulf smoothhound
sharks are managed under the authority
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act.
NMFS manages all shark species, except
for spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias),
under the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic
Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) and its
amendments.
NMFS recently assessed the status of
these species for the first time using the
Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR) process. The final
stock assessment (SEDAR 39) was
finalized and peer reviewed in March
2015.
Data from tagging and genetic
research in SEDAR 39 support the
existence of two distinct Atlantic and
Gulf of Mexico stocks of smooth dogfish
separated by peninsular Florida.
Therefore, smooth dogfish was treated
as two separate stocks, one in the
Atlantic region and one in the Gulf of
Mexico region.
Additionally, because smooth dogfish
are the only species of smoothhound
sharks occurring in the Atlantic region,
the scientists conducted a stock
assessment for only this species in the
Atlantic region. However, because all
three species occur in the Gulf of
Mexico, and given the difficulty with
distinguishing among and identifying
the individual species of smoothhound
sharks occurring in the Gulf of Mexico
region, the scientists treated all three
smoothhound species (smooth dogfish,
Florida smoothhound, and Gulf
smoothhound) as a single smoothhound
shark complex within the Gulf of
Mexico region.
All documents and information
regarding SEDAR 39 can be found on
the SEDAR Web page at https://
sedarweb.org/sedar-39.
Atlantic Region
For Atlantic smooth dogfish, the
scientists used a length-based agestructured stock assessment model. This
was the first HMS shark stock
assessment conducted within the
SEDAR process to utilize this type of
modeling framework. The Atlantic
smooth dogfish assessment
implemented spawning stock fecundity
(SSF), which was used as a proxy for
biomass, natural mortality (M),
steepness of the Beverton-Holt stockrecruitment relationship, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
selectivity patterns using the same
methods as in previous HMS shark
assessment.
Two selectivity patterns were
explored for the main targeted gillnet
fishery (dome-shaped and asymptotic).
The use of these two selectivity patterns
resulted in two alternative base model
configurations being evaluated. Based
on diagnostic results, the scientists
recommended that the dome-shaped
functional form be selected as the base
model. The peer reviewers found this
base model to be an appropriate
methodology.
For this base model, the stock
assessment scientists explored seven
sensitivity scenarios. All seven model
runs found that SSF in 2012 (SSF2012),
was greater than SSFMSY (SSF2012/
SSFMSY ranged from 1.96 to 2.81 vs.
2.29 in the base model) and that F2012
was less than FMSY (F2012/FMSY ranged
from 0.61 to 0.99 vs. 0.79 in the base
model). Projection results for the base
model configuration indicated that
levels of fixed removals less than or
equal to 550 (1000s of sharks) resulted
in at least a 70 percent probability of
maintaining SSF above SSFMSY during
the years 2013–2022. Projections for the
seven sensitivity scenarios resulted in a
range of fixed removals from 350 to 850
(1000s of sharks) with at least a 70
percent probability of maintaining SSF
above SSFMSY during the years 2013–
2022.
The peer reviewers found it is likely
that the Atlantic smooth dogfish stock is
not overfished, and overfishing is not
occurring based on the base model and
range of associated sensitivities. The
peer reviewers indicated that the range
of sensitivities appropriately captured
the uncertainty regarding the states of
nature and the potential implications for
the reference points. However they
cautioned about inferences drawn about
stock status because of the level of
uncertainty associated with the stockrecruitment relationship and
uncertainty in the catches, and noted
that the fishing level for the most recent
year is close to FMSY for some
sensitivity runs. Overall, the peer
reviewers determined the stock
assessment to be based on the best
scientific information available. Based
on these results, NMFS determined that
the status of smooth dogfish is not
overfished and overfishing is not
occurring.
Gulf of Mexico Region
The model structure for the Gulf of
Mexico smoothhound shark complex
was different than the Atlantic stock of
smooth dogfish because of the need to
combine life history data for all three
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36973-36974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15903]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-007]
Barium Chloride From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 1, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the
``Department'') initiated the fourth five-year (``sunset'') review of
the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from the People's
Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\ As a result of this sunset
review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on barium chloride from the PRC would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the
``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 24900
(May 1, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 1, 2015, the Department received an adequate substantive
response from domestic interested party Chemical Products Corporation
(``Petitioner'') within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).\2\ We received no responses from respondent
interested parties. As a result, the Department conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of the order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Petitioner's June 1, 2015, submission, re; ``Substantive
Response to the Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Review of Chemical
Products Corporation.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review
of the Antidumping Duty Order on Barium Chloride from the People's
Republic of China'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (``Decision Memorandum''). The
issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins
likely to prevail if the order were to be revoked. Parties may find a
complete discussion of all issues raised in the review and the
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System
(``ACCESS''). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum is available
directly on the Web at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is barium chloride, a chemical
compound having the formulas BaCl2 or BaCl2-2H2O, currently
classifiable under item number 2827.39.45.00 of the
[[Page 36974]]
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The scope reflects the HTSUS item number currently in
effect. The full scope of the order is provided in the Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act, we determine that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from the PRC would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted
average margins up to 155.50 percent.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return of destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
This sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections
751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 23, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-15903 Filed 6-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P