Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Second Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 35628-35630 [2015-15312]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
35628
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Notices
Background: The Travel Promotion
Act of 2009 (TPA) was signed into law
by President Obama on March 4, 2010.
The TPA established the Corporation for
Travel Promotion (the Corporation), as a
non-profit corporation charged with the
development and execution of a plan to
(A) provide useful information to those
interested in traveling to the United
States; (B) identify and address
perceptions regarding U.S. entry
policies; (C) maximize economic and
diplomatic benefits of travel to the
United States through the use of various
promotional tools; (D) ensure that
international travel benefits all States
and the District of Columbia, and (E)
identify opportunities to promote
tourism to rural and urban areas
equally, including areas not
traditionally visited by international
travelers.
The Corporation is governed by a
Board of Directors, consisting of 11
members with knowledge of
international travel promotion or
marketing, broadly representing various
regions of the United States. The TPA
directs the Secretary of Commerce (after
consultation with the Secretary of
Homeland Security and the Secretary of
State) to appoint the Board of Directors
for the Corporation.
At this time, the Department will be
selecting three individuals with the
appropriate expertise and experience
from specific sectors of the travel and
tourism industry to serve on the Board
as follows:
(A) 1 shall have appropriate expertise
and experience in a city convention and
visitors’ bureau;
(B) 1 shall have appropriate expertise
and experience in the restaurant
industry; and
(C) 1 shall have appropriate expertise
and experience as an official in a State
tourism office.
To be eligible for Board membership,
individuals must have international
travel and tourism marketing
experience, be a current or former chief
executive officer, chief financial officer,
or chief marketing officer or have held
an equivalent management position.
Additional consideration will be given
to individuals who have experience
working in U.S. multinational entities
with marketing budgets, and who are
audit committee financial experts as
defined by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (in accordance with section
407 of Pub. L. 107–204 [15 U.S.C.
7265]). Individuals must be U.S.
citizens, and in addition, cannot be
federally registered lobbyists or
registered as a foreign agent under the
Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938,
as amended.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jun 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
Those selected for the Board must be
able to meet the time and effort
commitments of the Board.
Board members serve at the discretion
of the Secretary of Commerce (who may
remove any member of the Board for
good cause). The terms of office of each
member of the Board appointed by the
Secretary shall be 3 years. Board
members can serve a maximum of two
consecutive full three-year terms. Board
members are not considered Federal
government employees by virtue of their
service as a member of the Board and
will receive no compensation from the
Federal government for their
participation in Board activities.
Members participating in Board
meetings and events may be paid actual
travel expenses and per diem when
away from their usual places of
residence by the Corporation.
To be considered for appointment,
please provide the following:
1. Name, title, and personal resume of
the individual requesting consideration,
including address, email address and
phone number; and
2. A brief statement of why the person
should be considered for appointment
to the Board. This statement should also
address the individual’s relevant
international travel and tourism
marketing experience and indicate
clearly the sector or sectors enumerated
above in which the individual has the
requisite expertise and experience.
Individuals who have the requisite
expertise and experience in more than
one sector can be appointed for only one
of those sectors. Appointments of
members to the Board will be made by
the Secretary of Commerce.
Dated: June 17, 2015.
Julie P. Heizer
Deputy Director, National Travel and Tourism
Office.
[FR Doc. 2015–15239 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–867]
Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Second Amended
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is amending its
amended final results in the
administrative review of the
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
antidumping duty order on large power
transformers from the Republic of Korea
(Korea) for the period February 16,
2012, through July 31, 2013, to correct
certain ministerial errors.
DATES: Effective date June 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Davis (Hyosung) or David Cordell
(Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office
VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–7924 or (202) 482–0408,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 6, 2015, the Department
published its amended final results in
the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on large power
transformers from Korea.1 On May 5,
2015,2 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co.,
Ltd. (HHI) and Hyundai Corporation,
USA (Hyundai USA) (collectively,
Hyundai) submitted a timely ministerial
error allegation with respect to the
programming language used in the
Amended Final Results.3 No other party
commented on this allegation. Based on
our analysis of this allegation, we made
changes to the calculation of the
weighted-average dumping margins for
Hyundai, Hyosung and for the nonindividually examined respondents.
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order covers large
liquid dielectric power transformers
(LPTs) having a top power handling
capacity greater than or equal to 60,000
kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes),
whether assembled or unassembled,
complete or incomplete.
Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies
consisting of the active part and any
other parts attached to, imported with or
invoiced with the active parts of LPTs.
The ‘‘active part’’ of the transformer
consists of one or more of the following
when attached to or otherwise
assembled with one another: The steel
core or shell, the windings, electrical
1 See Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 80 FR 26001 (May 6, 2015) (Amended Final
Results).
2 May 5, 2015, was within 5 days of disclosure of
the Department’s calculations to all interested
parties.
3 See Letter from Hyundai to the Department,
‘‘Antidumping Administrative Review of Large
Power Transformers from Korea—Ministerial Error
Comments on the Amended Final Results of the
First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review’’
dated May 5, 2015.
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Notices
insulation between the windings, the
mechanical frame for an LPT.
The product definition encompasses
all such LPTs regardless of name
designation, including but not limited to
step-up transformers, step-down
transformers, autotransformers,
interconnection transformers, voltage
regulator transformers, rectifier
transformers, and power rectifier
transformers.
The LPTs subject to this order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and
8504.90.9540 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Ministerial Error
Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as
an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or
other arithmetic function, clerical error
resulting from inaccurate copying,
duplication, or the like, and any other
similar type of unintentional error
which the Secretary considers
ministerial.’’
We agree with Hyundai that in the
Department’s amended final Margin
Program, the Department erred by
inadvertently removing the commission
offset from the Margin Program.
However, for reasons outlined in the
accompanying ministerial error
memorandum and in the calculation
memoranda,4 the Department does not
agree with Hyundai’s suggested
programming changes because it would
revert the program back to the program
used in the final results, which the
Department determined to be incorrect
in its amended final. As we explain in
the Ministerial Error Memorandum and
company–specific analysis memoranda,
we continue to find that CEPOTHER is
meant to capture any other CEP
(incurred in the U.S.) direct selling,
further manufacturing, etc. However, we
4 See Memoranda entitled ‘‘Second Amended
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Large Power
Transformers From the Republic of Korea; 2012–
2013: Allegations of Ministerial Errors’’ (Ministerial
Error Memorandum); ‘‘Analysis of Data Submitted
by Hyosung Corporation in the Second Amended
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Large Power
Transformers From the Republic of Korea; 2012–
2013’’; and ‘‘Analysis of Data Submitted by
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI) and
Hyundai Corporation, USA (Hyundai USA)
(collectively, Hyundai) in the Second Amended
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Large Power
Transformers From the Republic of Korea; 2012–
2013,’’ dated concurrently with this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jun 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
35629
specific ad valorem rates by aggregating
the amount of dumping calculated for
all U.S. sales to that importer or
customer and dividing this amount by
the total entered value of the sales to
that importer (or customer). Where an
importer (or customer)-specific ad
valorem rate is greater than de minimis,
and the respondent has reported reliable
entered values, we apply the assessment
rate to the entered value of the
importer’s/customer’s entries during the
review period.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
Amended Final Results of the Review
May 6, 2003.6 This clarification will
The Department determines that the
apply to entries of subject merchandise
following amended weighted-average
during the period of review (POR)
dumping margins exist for the period
produced by the respondent for which
February 16, 2012, through July 31,
it did not know its merchandise was
2013:
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
Weightedliquidate unreviewed entries at the allaverage
Manufacturer/exporter
others rate if there is no rate for the
margin
(percent)
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
Hyosung Corporation ................
8.23 this clarification, see the Automatic
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co.,
Assessment Clarification.
Ltd. ........................................
12.36
We do not intend to issue assessment
ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd. .............
10.54
ILJIN .........................................
10.54 instructions to CBP at this time because
LSIS Co., Ltd. ...........................
10.54 of the preliminary injunction that was
issued after the issuance of the Final
Results. See CBP Message Number
Duty Assessment
5111304. We intend to issue assessment
The Department shall determine and
instructions directly to CBP after
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
conclusion of the litigation and the
(CBP) shall assess antidumping duties
ending of the injunction.
on all appropriate entries.5 For any
individually examined respondents
Cash Deposit Instructions
whose weighted-average dumping
The following cash deposit
margin is above de minimis, we
requirements will be effective upon
calculated importer-specific ad valorem publication of this notice for all
duty assessment rates based on the ratio shipments of subject merchandise
of the total amount of dumping
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
calculated for the importer’s examined
for consumption on or after the
sales to the total entered value of those
publication of these amended final
same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)
351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the
of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for
amended final results of this
respondents noted above will be the rate
administrative review, if any importerestablished in the Amended Final
specific assessment rates calculated in
Results of this administrative review; (2)
the amended final results are above de
for merchandise exported by
minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent),
manufacturers or exporters not covered
the Department will issue instructions
in this administrative review but
directly to CBP to assess antidumping
covered in a prior segment of the
duties on appropriate entries.
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
To determine whether the duty
continue to be the company specific rate
assessment rates covering the period
published for the most recently
were de minimis, in accordance with
completed segment of this proceeding;
the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we
in this review, a prior review, or the
calculated importer (or customer)original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
5 In these final results, the Department applied
will be the rate established for the most
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
agree that by including commissions in
the CEPOTHER field we inadvertently
failed to account for the commission
offset as we originally intended (and
did) in the preliminary and final results.
We are therefore making changes to the
Margin Program and the Macros
Program to account for the error. We
find that we made an inadvertent error
in not accounting for the commission
offset, and therefore, are correcting and
amending the amended final results of
review in accordance with section
751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Automatic Assessment
Clarification).
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
35630
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Notices
recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of the
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 22.00
percent, the all-others rate established
in the antidumping investigation.7
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
amended final results in accordance
with section 751(h) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.224(f).
Dated: June 15, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–15312 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
7 See
Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR
53177 (August 31, 2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jun 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Progress Report
on Cooperative Halibut Prohibited
Species Catch Minimization
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Patsy A. Bearden, (907) 586–
7008 or Patsy.Bearden@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
This request is for revision of an
existing information collection.
The purpose of this collection is for
each sector in the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area
(BSAI) groundfish fisheries to inform
the North Pacific Fisheries Management
Council (Council) of their progress on
voluntary, non-regulatory methods they
are using within their fishery
cooperatives to reduce halibut mortality
and to report the effectiveness of those
actions in absolute reductions in halibut
mortality.
At the June 2015 meeting, the Council
requested that, in addition to providing
the BSAI Halibut Prohibited Species
Catch (PSC) Progress Report,
Amendment 80 cooperatives provide
their 2016 Halibut PSC Management
Plans at the December 2015 Council
meeting. Since 2011, all vessels and
companies participating in the
Amendment 80 sector have been
affiliated with one of two Amendment
80 cooperatives, the Alaska Seafood
Cooperative or the Alaska Groundfish
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Cooperative. The plans should be
designed not just to accommodate the
revised hard caps, but to bring savings
to levels below the hard cap.
II. Method of Collection
Respondents have a choice of either
electronic or paper forms. Methods of
submittal include email of electronic
forms, and mail and facsimile
transmission of paper forms.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–0697.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(revision of an existing information
collection).
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 8.
Estimated Time per Response: 40
hours for BSAI Halibut Bycatch
Avoidance Progress report; 12 hours for
Amendment 80 Halibut PSC
Management Plan.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 264 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $4 in recordkeeping/reporting
costs.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 17, 2015.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–15235 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35628-35630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15312]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-867]
Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Second
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-
2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is amending its
amended final results in the administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on large power transformers from the Republic of Korea
(Korea) for the period February 16, 2012, through July 31, 2013, to
correct certain ministerial errors.
DATES: Effective date June 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Davis (Hyosung) or David Cordell
(Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-7924 or (202) 482-0408, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 6, 2015, the Department published its amended final results
in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large
power transformers from Korea.\1\ On May 5, 2015,\2\ Hyundai Heavy
Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI) and Hyundai Corporation, USA (Hyundai USA)
(collectively, Hyundai) submitted a timely ministerial error allegation
with respect to the programming language used in the Amended Final
Results.\3\ No other party commented on this allegation. Based on our
analysis of this allegation, we made changes to the calculation of the
weighted-average dumping margins for Hyundai, Hyosung and for the non-
individually examined respondents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea:
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2012-2013, 80 FR 26001 (May 6, 2015) (Amended Final Results).
\2\ May 5, 2015, was within 5 days of disclosure of the
Department's calculations to all interested parties.
\3\ See Letter from Hyundai to the Department, ``Antidumping
Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers from Korea--
Ministerial Error Comments on the Amended Final Results of the First
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' dated May 5, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power
transformers (LPTs) having a top power handling capacity greater than
or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether
assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete.
Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies consisting of the active part and
any other parts attached to, imported with or invoiced with the active
parts of LPTs. The ``active part'' of the transformer consists of one
or more of the following when attached to or otherwise assembled with
one another: The steel core or shell, the windings, electrical
[[Page 35629]]
insulation between the windings, the mechanical frame for an LPT.
The product definition encompasses all such LPTs regardless of name
designation, including but not limited to step-up transformers, step-
down transformers, autotransformers, interconnection transformers,
voltage regulator transformers, rectifier transformers, and power
rectifier transformers.
The LPTs subject to this order are currently classifiable under
subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.
Ministerial Error
Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ``ministerial error'' as an error ``in
addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error
resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any
other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers
ministerial.''
We agree with Hyundai that in the Department's amended final Margin
Program, the Department erred by inadvertently removing the commission
offset from the Margin Program. However, for reasons outlined in the
accompanying ministerial error memorandum and in the calculation
memoranda,\4\ the Department does not agree with Hyundai's suggested
programming changes because it would revert the program back to the
program used in the final results, which the Department determined to
be incorrect in its amended final. As we explain in the Ministerial
Error Memorandum and company-specific analysis memoranda, we continue
to find that CEPOTHER is meant to capture any other CEP (incurred in
the U.S.) direct selling, further manufacturing, etc. However, we agree
that by including commissions in the CEPOTHER field we inadvertently
failed to account for the commission offset as we originally intended
(and did) in the preliminary and final results. We are therefore making
changes to the Margin Program and the Macros Program to account for the
error. We find that we made an inadvertent error in not accounting for
the commission offset, and therefore, are correcting and amending the
amended final results of review in accordance with section 751(h) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memoranda entitled ``Second Amended Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers
From the Republic of Korea; 2012-2013: Allegations of Ministerial
Errors'' (Ministerial Error Memorandum); ``Analysis of Data
Submitted by Hyosung Corporation in the Second Amended Final Results
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Power
Transformers From the Republic of Korea; 2012-2013''; and ``Analysis
of Data Submitted by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI) and
Hyundai Corporation, USA (Hyundai USA) (collectively, Hyundai) in
the Second Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers From the Republic
of Korea; 2012-2013,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results of the Review
The Department determines that the following amended weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period February 16, 2012, through
July 31, 2013:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyosung Corporation........................................ 8.23
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.......................... 12.36
ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd.................................... 10.54
ILJIN...................................................... 10.54
LSIS Co., Ltd.............................................. 10.54
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty Assessment
The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries.\5\ For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer-
specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to
the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the amended final results of this
administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates
calculated in the amended final results are above de minimis (i.e., at
or above 0.5 percent), the Department will issue instructions directly
to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ In these final results, the Department applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period
were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we calculated importer (or
customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the amount of
dumping calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and
dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to that
importer (or customer). Where an importer (or customer)-specific ad
valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent has
reported reliable entered values, we apply the assessment rate to the
entered value of the importer's/customer's entries during the review
period.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003.\6\ This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the period of review (POR) produced by the
respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see the Automatic Assessment
Clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Automatic Assessment Clarification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We do not intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP at this
time because of the preliminary injunction that was issued after the
issuance of the Final Results. See CBP Message Number 5111304. We
intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP after
conclusion of the litigation and the ending of the injunction.
Cash Deposit Instructions
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
publication of these amended final results, as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted
above will be the rate established in the Amended Final Results of this
administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or
exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to
be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the most
[[Page 35630]]
recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of
the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 22.00 percent, the all-
others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\7\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea:
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these amended final results in
accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f).
Dated: June 15, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-15312 Filed 6-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
