Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Second Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 35628-35630 [2015-15312]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 35628 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Notices Background: The Travel Promotion Act of 2009 (TPA) was signed into law by President Obama on March 4, 2010. The TPA established the Corporation for Travel Promotion (the Corporation), as a non-profit corporation charged with the development and execution of a plan to (A) provide useful information to those interested in traveling to the United States; (B) identify and address perceptions regarding U.S. entry policies; (C) maximize economic and diplomatic benefits of travel to the United States through the use of various promotional tools; (D) ensure that international travel benefits all States and the District of Columbia, and (E) identify opportunities to promote tourism to rural and urban areas equally, including areas not traditionally visited by international travelers. The Corporation is governed by a Board of Directors, consisting of 11 members with knowledge of international travel promotion or marketing, broadly representing various regions of the United States. The TPA directs the Secretary of Commerce (after consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State) to appoint the Board of Directors for the Corporation. At this time, the Department will be selecting three individuals with the appropriate expertise and experience from specific sectors of the travel and tourism industry to serve on the Board as follows: (A) 1 shall have appropriate expertise and experience in a city convention and visitors’ bureau; (B) 1 shall have appropriate expertise and experience in the restaurant industry; and (C) 1 shall have appropriate expertise and experience as an official in a State tourism office. To be eligible for Board membership, individuals must have international travel and tourism marketing experience, be a current or former chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or chief marketing officer or have held an equivalent management position. Additional consideration will be given to individuals who have experience working in U.S. multinational entities with marketing budgets, and who are audit committee financial experts as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (in accordance with section 407 of Pub. L. 107–204 [15 U.S.C. 7265]). Individuals must be U.S. citizens, and in addition, cannot be federally registered lobbyists or registered as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:45 Jun 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 Those selected for the Board must be able to meet the time and effort commitments of the Board. Board members serve at the discretion of the Secretary of Commerce (who may remove any member of the Board for good cause). The terms of office of each member of the Board appointed by the Secretary shall be 3 years. Board members can serve a maximum of two consecutive full three-year terms. Board members are not considered Federal government employees by virtue of their service as a member of the Board and will receive no compensation from the Federal government for their participation in Board activities. Members participating in Board meetings and events may be paid actual travel expenses and per diem when away from their usual places of residence by the Corporation. To be considered for appointment, please provide the following: 1. Name, title, and personal resume of the individual requesting consideration, including address, email address and phone number; and 2. A brief statement of why the person should be considered for appointment to the Board. This statement should also address the individual’s relevant international travel and tourism marketing experience and indicate clearly the sector or sectors enumerated above in which the individual has the requisite expertise and experience. Individuals who have the requisite expertise and experience in more than one sector can be appointed for only one of those sectors. Appointments of members to the Board will be made by the Secretary of Commerce. Dated: June 17, 2015. Julie P. Heizer Deputy Director, National Travel and Tourism Office. [FR Doc. 2015–15239 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Second Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is amending its amended final results in the administrative review of the AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 antidumping duty order on large power transformers from the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the period February 16, 2012, through July 31, 2013, to correct certain ministerial errors. DATES: Effective date June 22, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Davis (Hyosung) or David Cordell (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7924 or (202) 482–0408, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 6, 2015, the Department published its amended final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers from Korea.1 On May 5, 2015,2 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI) and Hyundai Corporation, USA (Hyundai USA) (collectively, Hyundai) submitted a timely ministerial error allegation with respect to the programming language used in the Amended Final Results.3 No other party commented on this allegation. Based on our analysis of this allegation, we made changes to the calculation of the weighted-average dumping margins for Hyundai, Hyosung and for the nonindividually examined respondents. Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers (LPTs) having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies consisting of the active part and any other parts attached to, imported with or invoiced with the active parts of LPTs. The ‘‘active part’’ of the transformer consists of one or more of the following when attached to or otherwise assembled with one another: The steel core or shell, the windings, electrical 1 See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 2013, 80 FR 26001 (May 6, 2015) (Amended Final Results). 2 May 5, 2015, was within 5 days of disclosure of the Department’s calculations to all interested parties. 3 See Letter from Hyundai to the Department, ‘‘Antidumping Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers from Korea—Ministerial Error Comments on the Amended Final Results of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review’’ dated May 5, 2015. E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Notices insulation between the windings, the mechanical frame for an LPT. The product definition encompasses all such LPTs regardless of name designation, including but not limited to step-up transformers, step-down transformers, autotransformers, interconnection transformers, voltage regulator transformers, rectifier transformers, and power rectifier transformers. The LPTs subject to this order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Ministerial Error Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.’’ We agree with Hyundai that in the Department’s amended final Margin Program, the Department erred by inadvertently removing the commission offset from the Margin Program. However, for reasons outlined in the accompanying ministerial error memorandum and in the calculation memoranda,4 the Department does not agree with Hyundai’s suggested programming changes because it would revert the program back to the program used in the final results, which the Department determined to be incorrect in its amended final. As we explain in the Ministerial Error Memorandum and company–specific analysis memoranda, we continue to find that CEPOTHER is meant to capture any other CEP (incurred in the U.S.) direct selling, further manufacturing, etc. However, we 4 See Memoranda entitled ‘‘Second Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea; 2012– 2013: Allegations of Ministerial Errors’’ (Ministerial Error Memorandum); ‘‘Analysis of Data Submitted by Hyosung Corporation in the Second Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea; 2012– 2013’’; and ‘‘Analysis of Data Submitted by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI) and Hyundai Corporation, USA (Hyundai USA) (collectively, Hyundai) in the Second Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea; 2012– 2013,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:45 Jun 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 35629 specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importer’s/customer’s entries during the review period. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on Amended Final Results of the Review May 6, 2003.6 This clarification will The Department determines that the apply to entries of subject merchandise following amended weighted-average during the period of review (POR) dumping margins exist for the period produced by the respondent for which February 16, 2012, through July 31, it did not know its merchandise was 2013: destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to Weightedliquidate unreviewed entries at the allaverage Manufacturer/exporter others rate if there is no rate for the margin (percent) intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of Hyosung Corporation ................ 8.23 this clarification, see the Automatic Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Assessment Clarification. Ltd. ........................................ 12.36 We do not intend to issue assessment ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd. ............. 10.54 ILJIN ......................................... 10.54 instructions to CBP at this time because LSIS Co., Ltd. ........................... 10.54 of the preliminary injunction that was issued after the issuance of the Final Results. See CBP Message Number Duty Assessment 5111304. We intend to issue assessment The Department shall determine and instructions directly to CBP after U.S. Customs and Border Protection conclusion of the litigation and the (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties ending of the injunction. on all appropriate entries.5 For any individually examined respondents Cash Deposit Instructions whose weighted-average dumping The following cash deposit margin is above de minimis, we requirements will be effective upon calculated importer-specific ad valorem publication of this notice for all duty assessment rates based on the ratio shipments of subject merchandise of the total amount of dumping entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, calculated for the importer’s examined for consumption on or after the sales to the total entered value of those publication of these amended final same sales in accordance with 19 CFR results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for amended final results of this respondents noted above will be the rate administrative review, if any importerestablished in the Amended Final specific assessment rates calculated in Results of this administrative review; (2) the amended final results are above de for merchandise exported by minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), manufacturers or exporters not covered the Department will issue instructions in this administrative review but directly to CBP to assess antidumping covered in a prior segment of the duties on appropriate entries. proceeding, the cash deposit rate will To determine whether the duty continue to be the company specific rate assessment rates covering the period published for the most recently were de minimis, in accordance with completed segment of this proceeding; the requirement set forth in 19 CFR (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we in this review, a prior review, or the calculated importer (or customer)original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 5 In these final results, the Department applied will be the rate established for the most the assessment rate calculation method adopted in agree that by including commissions in the CEPOTHER field we inadvertently failed to account for the commission offset as we originally intended (and did) in the preliminary and final results. We are therefore making changes to the Margin Program and the Macros Program to account for the error. We find that we made an inadvertent error in not accounting for the commission offset, and therefore, are correcting and amending the amended final results of review in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e). Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Automatic Assessment Clarification). E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 35630 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Notices recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 22.00 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation.7 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these amended final results in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f). Dated: June 15, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–15312 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am] tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 7 See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:45 Jun 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Progress Report on Cooperative Halibut Prohibited Species Catch Minimization National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 21, 2015. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to Patsy A. Bearden, (907) 586– 7008 or Patsy.Bearden@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Abstract This request is for revision of an existing information collection. The purpose of this collection is for each sector in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI) groundfish fisheries to inform the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council (Council) of their progress on voluntary, non-regulatory methods they are using within their fishery cooperatives to reduce halibut mortality and to report the effectiveness of those actions in absolute reductions in halibut mortality. At the June 2015 meeting, the Council requested that, in addition to providing the BSAI Halibut Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) Progress Report, Amendment 80 cooperatives provide their 2016 Halibut PSC Management Plans at the December 2015 Council meeting. Since 2011, all vessels and companies participating in the Amendment 80 sector have been affiliated with one of two Amendment 80 cooperatives, the Alaska Seafood Cooperative or the Alaska Groundfish PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 Cooperative. The plans should be designed not just to accommodate the revised hard caps, but to bring savings to levels below the hard cap. II. Method of Collection Respondents have a choice of either electronic or paper forms. Methods of submittal include email of electronic forms, and mail and facsimile transmission of paper forms. III. Data OMB Control Number: 0648–0697. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Regular submission (revision of an existing information collection). Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. Estimated Number of Respondents: 8. Estimated Time per Response: 40 hours for BSAI Halibut Bycatch Avoidance Progress report; 12 hours for Amendment 80 Halibut PSC Management Plan. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 264 hours. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $4 in recordkeeping/reporting costs. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: June 17, 2015. Sarah Brabson, NOAA PRA Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–15235 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35628-35630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-867]


Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Second 
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-
2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is amending its 
amended final results in the administrative review of the antidumping 
duty order on large power transformers from the Republic of Korea 
(Korea) for the period February 16, 2012, through July 31, 2013, to 
correct certain ministerial errors.

DATES: Effective date June 22, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Davis (Hyosung) or David Cordell 
(Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-7924 or (202) 482-0408, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On May 6, 2015, the Department published its amended final results 
in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large 
power transformers from Korea.\1\ On May 5, 2015,\2\ Hyundai Heavy 
Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI) and Hyundai Corporation, USA (Hyundai USA) 
(collectively, Hyundai) submitted a timely ministerial error allegation 
with respect to the programming language used in the Amended Final 
Results.\3\ No other party commented on this allegation. Based on our 
analysis of this allegation, we made changes to the calculation of the 
weighted-average dumping margins for Hyundai, Hyosung and for the non-
individually examined respondents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: 
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2012-2013, 80 FR 26001 (May 6, 2015) (Amended Final Results).
    \2\ May 5, 2015, was within 5 days of disclosure of the 
Department's calculations to all interested parties.
    \3\ See Letter from Hyundai to the Department, ``Antidumping 
Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers from Korea--
Ministerial Error Comments on the Amended Final Results of the First 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' dated May 5, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power 
transformers (LPTs) having a top power handling capacity greater than 
or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether 
assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete.
    Incomplete LPTs are subassemblies consisting of the active part and 
any other parts attached to, imported with or invoiced with the active 
parts of LPTs. The ``active part'' of the transformer consists of one 
or more of the following when attached to or otherwise assembled with 
one another: The steel core or shell, the windings, electrical

[[Page 35629]]

insulation between the windings, the mechanical frame for an LPT.
    The product definition encompasses all such LPTs regardless of name 
designation, including but not limited to step-up transformers, step-
down transformers, autotransformers, interconnection transformers, 
voltage regulator transformers, rectifier transformers, and power 
rectifier transformers.
    The LPTs subject to this order are currently classifiable under 
subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the 
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, 
the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.

Ministerial Error

    Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 
19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ``ministerial error'' as an error ``in 
addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error 
resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any 
other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers 
ministerial.''
    We agree with Hyundai that in the Department's amended final Margin 
Program, the Department erred by inadvertently removing the commission 
offset from the Margin Program. However, for reasons outlined in the 
accompanying ministerial error memorandum and in the calculation 
memoranda,\4\ the Department does not agree with Hyundai's suggested 
programming changes because it would revert the program back to the 
program used in the final results, which the Department determined to 
be incorrect in its amended final. As we explain in the Ministerial 
Error Memorandum and company-specific analysis memoranda, we continue 
to find that CEPOTHER is meant to capture any other CEP (incurred in 
the U.S.) direct selling, further manufacturing, etc. However, we agree 
that by including commissions in the CEPOTHER field we inadvertently 
failed to account for the commission offset as we originally intended 
(and did) in the preliminary and final results. We are therefore making 
changes to the Margin Program and the Macros Program to account for the 
error. We find that we made an inadvertent error in not accounting for 
the commission offset, and therefore, are correcting and amending the 
amended final results of review in accordance with section 751(h) of 
the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memoranda entitled ``Second Amended Final Results of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers 
From the Republic of Korea; 2012-2013: Allegations of Ministerial 
Errors'' (Ministerial Error Memorandum); ``Analysis of Data 
Submitted by Hyosung Corporation in the Second Amended Final Results 
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Power 
Transformers From the Republic of Korea; 2012-2013''; and ``Analysis 
of Data Submitted by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (HHI) and 
Hyundai Corporation, USA (Hyundai USA) (collectively, Hyundai) in 
the Second Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Large Power Transformers From the Republic 
of Korea; 2012-2013,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of the Review

    The Department determines that the following amended weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period February 16, 2012, through 
July 31, 2013:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                   Manufacturer/exporter                        margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyosung Corporation........................................         8.23
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd..........................        12.36
ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd....................................        10.54
ILJIN......................................................        10.54
LSIS Co., Ltd..............................................        10.54
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duty Assessment

    The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries.\5\ For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer-
specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the 
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to 
the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the amended final results of this 
administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates 
calculated in the amended final results are above de minimis (i.e., at 
or above 0.5 percent), the Department will issue instructions directly 
to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In these final results, the Department applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period 
were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we calculated importer (or 
customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the amount of 
dumping calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and 
dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to that 
importer (or customer). Where an importer (or customer)-specific ad 
valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent has 
reported reliable entered values, we apply the assessment rate to the 
entered value of the importer's/customer's entries during the review 
period.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003.\6\ This clarification will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the period of review (POR) produced by the 
respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for 
the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full 
discussion of this clarification, see the Automatic Assessment 
Clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(Automatic Assessment Clarification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We do not intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP at this 
time because of the preliminary injunction that was issued after the 
issuance of the Final Results. See CBP Message Number 5111304. We 
intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP after 
conclusion of the litigation and the ending of the injunction.

Cash Deposit Instructions

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
publication of these amended final results, as provided by section 
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted 
above will be the rate established in the Amended Final Results of this 
administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or 
exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a 
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to 
be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 
in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the 
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most

[[Page 35630]]

recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of 
the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 22.00 percent, the all-
others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\7\ These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and 
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these amended final results in 
accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f).

    Dated: June 15, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-15312 Filed 6-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P