Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, In Part, of Administrative Review and Final Results of New Shipper Review; 2013, 34619-34621 [2015-14967]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 116 / Wednesday, June 17, 2015 / Notices Dated: June 11, 2015. Michael S. DeVillo, Eligibility Examiner. information, contact Camille Evans at Camille.Evans@trade.gov or (202) 482– 2350. [FR Doc. 2015–14937 Filed 6–16–15; 8:45 am] Dated: June 11, 2015. Elizabeth Whiteman, Acting Executive Secretary. BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P [FR Doc. 2015–14966 Filed 6–16–15; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Foreign-Trade Zones Board DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zone 61—San Juan, Puerto Rico; Application for Subzone; Autogermana, Inc., San Juan, Puerto Rico asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [S–89–2015] International Trade Administration An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by the Puerto Rico Trade & Export Company, grantee of FTZ 61, requesting subzone status for the facility of Autogermana, Inc., located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on June 11, 2015. The proposed subzone (2.63 acres) is ˜ located at 1086 Munoz Rivera Avenue in San Juan. The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 61. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time. Autogermana is currently operating within Site 22 of FTZ 61. The applicant is also requesting removal of Site 22 of FTZ 61 following a transition period to allow merchandise to be transferred to the new subzone. In accordance with the Board’s regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is July 27, 2015. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to August 11, 2015. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Jun 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 [A–570–890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, In Part, of Administrative Review and Final Results of New Shipper Review; 2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On February 11, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) published the preliminary results of a new shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) and the ninth administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).1 The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. The AR covers 28 PRC exporters of subject merchandise, of which the Department selected one company for individual examination, Jiedong Lehouse Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiedong Lehouse’’). The NSR covers one exporter-producer of subject merchandise: Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wuxi Yushea’’). The Department invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received comments from the American Furniture Manufactures Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’) which agreed with our Preliminary Results in the administrative review. No other party commented. Accordingly, our final results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results. DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O’Connor, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, AGENCY: 1 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews; 2013, 80 FR 7576 (February 11, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 34619 U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0989. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background As noted above, on February 11, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results of the NSR and AR of the antidumping duty order on WBF from the PRC covering the period January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. On March 13, 2015, Petitioners filed briefs in the AR. No other parties submitted comments on the Preliminary Results in the AR or the NSR. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture, subject to certain exceptions.2 Imports of subject merchandise are classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080, 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.60.8081, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.3 Analysis of the Comments Received The issues raised in Petitioners’ case brief are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum which is dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit of the main Department building, Room 7046. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https:// 2 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) (‘‘Order’’). 3 For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2013 Administrative Review and New Shipper Review’’ (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’). E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1 34620 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 116 / Wednesday, June 17, 2015 / Notices enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Rescission, In Part In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that 16 companies under review in the AR, including Jiedong Lehouse, the company that the Department selected as a mandatory respondent, did not establish their eligibility for separate rate status and will be treated as part of the PRC-wide entity.4 Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity, we will rescind the AR with respect to these 16 companies, including Jiedong Lehouse, as part of the PRC-wide entity.5 Further, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to liquidate entries for these companies at the PRC-wide entity rate, which is 216.01 percent. our finding of no shipments by these 12 companies. In these final results, we continue to determine that these 12 companies had no reviewable transactions of subject merchandise during the POR. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we determined that 12 companies subject to this AR did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR.6 We did not receive any comments concerning The Department has determined that the following dumping margin exists for the exporter-producer combination listed below for the period January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013: Final Results of the 2013 New Shipper Review Weighted-average dumping margin (percent) Exporter Producer Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................... Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd .......................................... Cash Deposit Requirements Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of these reviews. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of these final results of reviews. For Wuxi Yushea, whose weighted average dumping margin is zero, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.7 We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate. If the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter’s case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.8 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Assessment Rates The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of these reviews for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date in the Federal Register of the final results of review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) With respect to Wuxi Yushea, the new shipper respondent, the Department established a combination cash deposit rate for this company, consistent with its practice, as follows: (1) For subject merchandise produced and exported by Wuxi Yushea, a zero cash deposit will be required. For subject merchandise exported by Wuxi Yushea, but not produced by Wuxi Yushea, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRCwide entity. For subject merchandise produced by Wuxi Yushea, but not exported by Wuxi Yushea, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the exporter; (2) For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non- 4 See Preliminary Results at 80 FR 7576. The 16 companies that did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate are: (1) Art Heritage International, Ltd., Super Art Furniture Co., Ltd., Artwork Metal & Plastic Co., Ltd., Jibson Industries Ltd., Always Loyal International; (2) Cheng Meng Furniture (Pte) Ltd., Cheng Meng Decoration & Furniture (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (3) Coe., Ltd.; (4) Dalian Huafeng Furniture Co., Ltd.; (5) Dalian Huafeng Furniture Group Co., Ltd.; (6) Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., Coronal Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (7) Dongguan Yujia Furniture Co., Ltd./Dongguan Yujia Furniture Co., Ltd.; (8) Liang Huang (Jiaxing) Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (9) Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.; (10) Prime Best Factory; (11) Prime Best International Co., Ltd.; (12) Prime Wood International Co., Ltd; (13) Sen Yeong International Co., Ltd., Sheh Hau International Trading Ltd.; (14) Strongson Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Strongson Furniture Co., Ltd., Strongson (Hk) Co.; (15) Zhang Zhou Sanlong Wood Product Co., Ltd.; and (16) Jiedong Lehouse Furniture Co., Ltd. See also Comment 1 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). 6 See Preliminary Results and accompanying Decision Memorandum at 6–7. Those 12 companies with no shipments during the POR are: (1) Baigou Crafts Factory Of Fengkai; (2) Clearwise Company Limited; (3) Dongguan Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd./Dongguan Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd.; (4) Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (5) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Jun 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 0.00 PRC exporters named above that did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) For all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; (4) For all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with (Pte) Ltd.; (6) Golden Well International (HK) Ltd./ Zhangzhou XYM Furniture Product Co., Ltd.; (7) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd./Haining Changbei Furniture Co., Ltd.; (8) Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony House Industries Co., Ltd.; (9) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (10) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (11) Yeh Brothers World Trade, Inc.; and (12) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & Educational Equipment Co., Ltd./ Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. 7 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 8 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 116 / Wednesday, June 17, 2015 / Notices this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. These final results of reviews are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213, 351.214. Dated: June 10, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether Jiedong Lehouse has Demonstrated Eligibility for Separate Rate Status Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–14967 Filed 6–16–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–274–806] Melamine From Trinidad and Tobago: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) preliminarily determines that melamine from Trinidad and Tobago is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’), as provided in section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’). The period of investigation is October 1, 2013 through September 30, 2014. The asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Jun 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 estimated weighted-average dumping margins are shown in the ‘‘Preliminary Determination’’ section of this notice. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4243. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department published the notice of initiation of this investigation on December 9, 2014.1 Pursuant to section 773(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department postponed this preliminary LTFV determination by a period of 50 days.2 Scope of the Investigation The merchandise subject to this investigation is melamine (Chemical Abstracts Service (‘‘CAS’’) registry number 108–78–01, molecular formula C3H6N6).3 Melamine is a crystalline powder or granule typically (but not exclusively) used to manufacture melamine formaldehyde resins. All melamine is covered by the scope of this investigation irrespective of purity, particle size, or physical form. Melamine that has been blended with other products is included within this scope when such blends include constituent parts that have been intermingled, but that have not been chemically reacted with each other to produce a different product. For such blends, only the melamine component of the mixture is covered by the scope of this investigation. Melamine that is otherwise subject to this investigation is not excluded when commingled with melamine from sources not subject to this investigation. Only the subject component of such commingled products is covered by the scope of this investigation. The subject merchandise is provided for in subheading 2933.61.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 1 See Melamine from the People’s Republic of China and Trinidad and Tobago: Initiation of LessThan-Fair-Value Investigations, 79 FR 73037 (December 9, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 2 See Melamine from the People’s Republic of China and Trinidad and Tobago: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations of Antidumping Duty Investigations, 80 FR 12979 (March 12, 2015). 3 Melamine is also known as 2,4,6-triamino-striazine; 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine; Cyanurotriamide; Cyanurotriamine; Cyanuramide; and by various brand names. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 34621 United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS subheading and CAS registry number are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Scope Comments The Department’s Initiation Notice provided interested parties an opportunity to raise issues regarding product coverage (scope).4 None of the parties to the proceeding provided scope comments with respect to this product. Methodology The Department has conducted this investigation in accordance with section 731 of the Act. We calculated constructed export price (‘‘CEP’’) in accordance with section 772 of the Act, and normal value (‘‘NV’’) in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Department’s Central Records Unit, located at room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 5 can be found at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. All Others Rate Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated ‘‘all others’’ rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. We based our calculation of the ‘‘all others’’ rate on the margin calculated for Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Limited (‘‘MHTL’’), 4 See Initiation Notice, 79 FR at 73037. Memorandum to Paul Piquado, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Melamine from Trinidad and Tobago,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum appears in Appendix II, below. 5 See E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34619-34621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-890]


Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results and Final Rescission, In Part, of Administrative Review 
and Final Results of New Shipper Review; 2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On February 11, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') published the preliminary results of a new shipper 
review (``NSR'') and the ninth administrative review (``AR'') of the 
antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (``WBF'') from the 
People's Republic of China (``PRC''), in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(``the Act'').\1\ The period of review (``POR'') is January 1, 2013, 
through December 31, 2013. The AR covers 28 PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise, of which the Department selected one company for 
individual examination, Jiedong Lehouse Furniture Co., Ltd. (``Jiedong 
Lehouse''). The NSR covers one exporter-producer of subject 
merchandise: Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd. (``Wuxi Yushea''). The 
Department invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary 
Results. We received comments from the American Furniture Manufactures 
Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. 
(``Petitioners'') which agreed with our Preliminary Results in the 
administrative review. No other party commented. Accordingly, our final 
results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and New Shipper Reviews; 2013, 80 FR 7576 (February 11, 2015) 
(``Preliminary Results'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    As noted above, on February 11, 2015, the Department published the 
Preliminary Results of the NSR and AR of the antidumping duty order on 
WBF from the PRC covering the period January 1, 2013, through December 
31, 2013. On March 13, 2015, Petitioners filed briefs in the AR. No 
other parties submitted comments on the Preliminary Results in the AR 
or the NSR.

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture, 
subject to certain exceptions.\2\ Imports of subject merchandise are 
classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(``HTSUS'') subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080, 
9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.60.8081, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. 
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written product description in the Order remains 
dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture 
From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) 
(``Order'').
    \3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see 
the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Wooden Bedroom 
Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision 
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2013 Administrative Review 
and New Shipper Review'' (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of the Comments Received

    The issues raised in Petitioners' case brief are addressed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum which is dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice. A list of the issues addressed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues 
and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (``ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and 
it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit of the main 
Department building, Room 7046. In addition, a complete version of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet 
at https://

[[Page 34620]]

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
are identical in content.

Final Rescission, In Part

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that 16 
companies under review in the AR, including Jiedong Lehouse, the 
company that the Department selected as a mandatory respondent, did not 
establish their eligibility for separate rate status and will be 
treated as part of the PRC-wide entity.\4\ Because no party requested a 
review of the PRC-wide entity, we will rescind the AR with respect to 
these 16 companies, including Jiedong Lehouse, as part of the PRC-wide 
entity.\5\ Further, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') to liquidate entries for these companies at the PRC-wide 
entity rate, which is 216.01 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Results at 80 FR 7576. The 16 companies that 
did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate are: (1) Art 
Heritage International, Ltd., Super Art Furniture Co., Ltd., Artwork 
Metal & Plastic Co., Ltd., Jibson Industries Ltd., Always Loyal 
International; (2) Cheng Meng Furniture (Pte) Ltd., Cheng Meng 
Decoration & Furniture (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (3) Coe., Ltd.; (4) 
Dalian Huafeng Furniture Co., Ltd.; (5) Dalian Huafeng Furniture 
Group Co., Ltd.; (6) Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., 
Coronal Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (7) Dongguan Yujia Furniture Co., 
Ltd./Dongguan Yujia Furniture Co., Ltd.; (8) Liang Huang (Jiaxing) 
Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (9) Marvin Furniture (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.; (10) 
Prime Best Factory; (11) Prime Best International Co., Ltd.; (12) 
Prime Wood International Co., Ltd; (13) Sen Yeong International Co., 
Ltd., Sheh Hau International Trading Ltd.; (14) Strongson Furniture 
(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Strongson Furniture Co., Ltd., Strongson (Hk) 
Co.; (15) Zhang Zhou Sanlong Wood Product Co., Ltd.; and (16) 
Jiedong Lehouse Furniture Co., Ltd. See also Comment 1 of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum.
    \5\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 
4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, we determined that 12 companies subject 
to this AR did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR.\6\ 
We did not receive any comments concerning our finding of no shipments 
by these 12 companies. In these final results, we continue to determine 
that these 12 companies had no reviewable transactions of subject 
merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Preliminary Results and accompanying Decision Memorandum 
at 6-7. Those 12 companies with no shipments during the POR are: (1) 
Baigou Crafts Factory Of Fengkai; (2) Clearwise Company Limited; (3) 
Dongguan Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd./Dongguan Chengcheng 
Furniture Co., Ltd.; (4) Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (5) 
Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (6) 
Golden Well International (HK) Ltd./Zhangzhou XYM Furniture Product 
Co., Ltd.; (7) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd./Haining Changbei 
Furniture Co., Ltd.; (8) Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., Tony 
House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony 
House Industries Co., Ltd.; (9) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; 
(10) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (11) Yeh 
Brothers World Trade, Inc.; and (12) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & 
Educational Equipment Co., Ltd./Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & 
Educational Equipment Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the 2013 New Shipper Review

    The Department has determined that the following dumping margin 
exists for the exporter-producer combination listed below for the 
period January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Weighted-average
            Exporter                  Producer         dumping margin
                                                          (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd.  Wuxi Yushea                       0.00
                                  Furniture Co.,
                                  Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with 
the final results of these reviews. The Department intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of 
these final results of reviews. For Wuxi Yushea, whose weighted average 
dumping margin is zero, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\7\ We intend 
to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject merchandise exported by 
the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the Department determines that an exporter under review had no 
shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered 
under that exporter's case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide 
rate.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of these reviews for shipments of the 
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date in the Federal 
Register of the final results of review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) With respect to Wuxi Yushea, the new 
shipper respondent, the Department established a combination cash 
deposit rate for this company, consistent with its practice, as 
follows: (1) For subject merchandise produced and exported by Wuxi 
Yushea, a zero cash deposit will be required. For subject merchandise 
exported by Wuxi Yushea, but not produced by Wuxi Yushea, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity. For subject 
merchandise produced by Wuxi Yushea, but not exported by Wuxi Yushea, 
the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the exporter; (2) 
For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters named 
above that did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR that 
received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the 
cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific 
rate; (3) For all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not 
been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; (4) 
For all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not 
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
    These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with

[[Page 34621]]

this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    These final results of reviews are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and 777(i) of the Act 
and 19 CFR 351.213, 351.214.

    Dated: June 10, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary, for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Jiedong Lehouse has Demonstrated Eligibility 
for Separate Rate Status
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-14967 Filed 6-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.