Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the 19th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 34141-34144 [2015-14656]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Notices
On January 29, 2015, Petitioners 3
submitted a rebuttal brief.
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results and
Partial Rescission of the 19th
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 8, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published its preliminary
results of the 2012–2013 administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on fresh garlic from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC).1 The period of
review is November 1, 2012, through
October 31, 2013. The mandatory
respondents in this review are: Hebei
Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd. (Golden
Bird) and Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd.
(Hejia). Following the Preliminary
Results, we invited interested parties to
comment. We have made no changes for
these final results of the antidumping
duty administrative review.
As discussed below, the Department
is relying on total adverse facts available
with respect to the PRC-wide entity,
which includes Golden Bird and Hejia,
because both failed to cooperate to the
best of their ability in this
administrative review. The Department
is also finding 16 companies had no
shipments during the period of review.
These determinations and the final
dumping margins are discussed below
in the ‘‘Final Results’’ section of this
notice.
AGENCY:
Effective Date: June 15, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Czajkowski, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1395.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Since the Department published the
preliminary results of this
administrative review,2 Golden Bird and
Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co. Ltd.
(Xinboda) submitted case briefs on
January 19 and 20, 2015, respectively.
1 See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of the Nineteenth
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 79 FR 72625 (December 8, 2014) (Preliminary
Results).
2 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jun 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Scope of the Order
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DATES:
34141
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
For the final results, based on analysis
of the comments received and our
review of the record, the Department
has made no changes to the Preliminary
Results. Detailed discussions of the
issues raised by parties can be found in
the Decision Memorandum.
The products subject to this
antidumping duty order are all grades of
garlic, whole or separated into
constituent cloves, whether or not
peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen,
provisionally preserved, or packed in
water or other neutral substance, but not
prepared or preserved by the addition of
other ingredients or heat processing.
Fresh garlic that are subject to the order
are currently classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010,
0703.200020, 0703.20.0090,
0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750,
0711.90.6000, and 2005.90.9700.
Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written product
description remains dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the Issues and Decision
memorandum dated concurrently with
and hereby adopted by this notice.4
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is dated concurrently and is
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of
the issues that are raised in the briefs
and addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is in Appendix
III of this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is made available to the
public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the
Department’s Central Records Unit,
located in Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be found at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed and the electronic versions of the
3 Petitioners consist of the following companies:
The Fresh Garlic Producers Association and its
individual members: Christopher Ranch L.L.C., The
Garlic Company, Valley Garlic, and Vessey and
Company, Inc.
4 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ‘‘Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Fresh
Garlic from the People’s Republic of China; 2012–
2013 Administrative Review,’’ issued concurrently
with this notice (Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Final Determination of No Shipments
As discussed in the Preliminary
Results, 16 companies timely certified
that they had no shipments during the
period of review. After reviewing these
certifications with U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) and examining
CBP shipment data, the Department
preliminary found that these companies
did not have reviewable transactions
during the POR.5 Since the Preliminary
Results, the Department has not
received comments or information that
would warrant a review of this
preliminary finding. As such, for these
final results, the Department finds that
the 16 companies listed in Appendix I
had no shipments during the POR.
PRC-Wide Entity
As discussed in the Preliminary
Results, the Department preliminarily
determined that 124 companies are part
of the PRC-wide entity.6 In addition to
the two mandatory respondents who
failed to cooperate to the best of their
ability to comply with requested
information, the Department also found
that 92 of the companies whose review
requests were withdrawn had not been
assigned a separate rate from a prior
segment of the proceeding, and thus
were considered part of the PRC-wide
entity. Further, an additional 30
companies, for which a review was
requested, and not withdrawn, did not
file a separate rate application or
certification, nor did they file a no
shipments certification. Accordingly,
the Department preliminarily
determined these companies to be part
of the PRC-wide entity. As discussed in
detail in the Decision Memorandum, the
Department continues to find Golden
Bird to be part of the PRC-wide entity.
Other than from Golden Bird, the
Department has not received comments
or information that would warrant a
review of the preliminary decision to
consider these companies part of the
PRC-wide entity. Thus, for these final
results, the Department continues to
find all 124 companies to be part of the
PRC-wide entity. A full list of
5 See
6 Id.
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
Preliminary Results at 72627.
at 72626.
15JNN1
34142
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Notices
companies determined to be part of the
PRC-wide entity can be found in
Appendix II.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department found that non-selected
companies Chengwu County Yuanxiang
Industry & Commerce Co, Ltd.; Jinxiang
Richfar Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd.;
Qingdao Lianghe International Trade
Co., Ltd.; Shandong Chenhe
International Trading Co., Ltd.;
Xinboda; Weifang Hongqiao
International Logistics Co., Ltd. and
XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry Co.,
Ltd. demonstrated their eligibility for
separate rates.7 Since the Preliminary
Results, the Department has not
received any comments that would
warrant a review of these preliminary
findings. Therefore, we continue to find
that these companies are eligible for
separate rates.
Neither the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), nor the
Department’s regulations address the
establishment of the rate applied to
individual companies not selected for
examination where the Department
limited its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The
Department’s practice in cases involving
limited selection based on exporters
accounting for the largest volumes of
exports has been to look to section
735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation.
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs
the Department to avoid calculating an
all-others rate using any rates that are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
facts available. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of
the Act provides that, where all rates are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
facts available, the Department may use
‘‘any reasonable method’’ for assigning
an all-others rate.
We determine that, consistent with
our Preliminary Results, the rate for
non-selected companies eligible for
separate rates should be based on the
rate used for non-selected separate rate
companies in the most recently
completed administrative review under
this order. This is consistent with
precedent and is a reasonable method to
determine this rate in the instant
review. Pursuant to this method, we are
assigning the rate of $1.82 per kilogram
to non-selected companies eligible for
separate rates, which is from the most
7 Id.
at 72626, 72627.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jun 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
recently completed administrative
review under this order.8
number (i.e., at the exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.10
Final Results of Review
Cash Deposit Requirements
The Department determines that the
following dumping margins exist for the
period November 1, 2012, through
October 31, 2013.
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act: (1) For the companies listed
above, the cash deposit rate will be the
weighted-average dumping margins
indicated above (except, if the rate is
zero or de minimis, then zero cash
deposit will be required); (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters not listed above
that received a separate rate in a prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of $4.71 per
kilogram; and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Weightedaverage
margin
(dollars
per
kilogram)
Exporter
Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd ..
Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd ............................
Qingdao Lianghe International
Trade Co., Ltd .........................
Shandong Chenhe International
Trading Co., Ltd ......................
Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial
Co., Ltd ...................................
Weifang Hongqiao International
Logistics Co., Ltd ....................
XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry
Co., Ltd ...................................
PRC-Wide Rate 9 ........................
1.82
1.82
1.82
1.82
1.82
1.82
1.82
4.71
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department has determined, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise, where applicable, in
accordance with the final results of this
review. The Department intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions for
such producers/exporters directly to
CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
The Department will direct CBP to
assess importer-specific assessment
rates based on the resulting per-unit
(i.e., per kilogram) amount on each
entry of the subject merchandise during
the POR. For entries that were not
reported in the U.S. sales database
submitted by an exporter individually
examined during this review, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide
rate. Additionally, if the Department
determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under that exporter’s case
8 See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the
18th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2011–2012, 79 FR 36721 (June 30, 2014).
9 Includes Golden Bird and Hejia.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Department’s
presumption that reimbursement of the
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to an Administrative
Protective Order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
10 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Notices
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
These final results are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: June 5, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I
Companies That Have Certified No
Shipments
1. Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co.,
Ltd.
2. Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry &
Commerce Co., Ltd.
3. Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.
5. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd.
6. Jinxiang Chengda Import & Export Co., Ltd.
7. Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd.
8. Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co., Ltd.
9. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd.
10. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.
11. Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
12. Qingdao Sea-line International Trading
Co.
13. Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd.
14. Qingdao Xiantianfeng Foods Co., Ltd. or
Xi Tian Feng
15. Xuzhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd.
16. Yantai Jinyan Trading Inc.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix II
List of Companies Subject to the PRC-Wide
Rate
1. American Pioneer Shipping
2. Anhui Dongqian Foods Ltd.
3. Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd.
4. Anqiu Haoshun Trade Co., Ltd.
5. APM Global Logistics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
6. APS Qingdao
7. Chiping Shengkang Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
8. CMEC Engineering Machinery Import &
Export Co., Ltd.
9. Dalian New Century Food Co., Ltd.
10. Dongying Shunyifa Chemical Co., Ltd.
11. Dynalink Systems Logistics (Qingdao)
Inc.
12. Eimskip Logistics Inc.
13. Feicheng Acid Chemicals Co., Ltd.
14. Foshan Fuyi Food Co, Ltd.
15. Frog World Co., Ltd.
16. Golden Bridge International, Inc.
17. Goodwave Technology Development Ltd.
18. Guangxi Lin Si Fu Bang Trade Co., Ltd
19. Hangzhou Guanyu Foods Co., Ltd.
20. Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd.
21. Hejiahuan (Zhongshan) Electrical AP
22. Henan Weite Industrial Co., Ltd.
23. Heze Ever-Best International Trade Co.,
Ltd. (f/k/a Shandong Heze International
Trade and Developing Company)
24. Hongkong Golden Eagle Group Ltd.
25. Hongqiao International Logistics Co.
26. Intecs Logistics Service Co., Ltd.
27. IT Logistics Qingdao Branch
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jun 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
28. Jinan Solar Summit International Co.,
Ltd.
29. Jinan Yipin Corporation Ltd.
30. Jining De-Rain Trading Co., Ltd.
31. Jining Highton Trading Co., Ltd.
32. Jining Jiulong International Trading Co.,
Ltd.
33. Jining Tiankuang Trade Co., Ltd.
34. Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd.
35. Jinxiang County Huaguang Food Import
& Export Co., Ltd.
36. Jinxiang Dacheng Food Co., Ltd.
37. Jinxiang Dongyun Freezing Storage Co.,
Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang Eastward Shipping
Import and Export Limited Company)
38. Jinxiang Dongyun Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
39. Jinxiang Fengsheng Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
40. Jinxiang Grand Agricultural Co., Ltd.
41. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd.
42. Jinxiang Infarm Fruits & Vegetables Co.,
Ltd.
43. Jinxiang Meihua Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.
44. Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing Storage Co.,
Ltd.
45. Jinxiang Shenglong Trade Co., Ltd.
46. Jinxiang Tianheng Trade Co., Ltd.
47. Jinxiang Tianma Freezing Storage Co.,
Ltd.
48. Jinxiang Xian Baishite Trade Co., Ltd.
(a/k/a Jinxiang Best Trade Co., Ltd.)
49. Juye Homestead Fruits and Vegetables
Co., Ltd.
50. Kingwin Industrial Co., Ltd.
51. Laiwu Fukai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
52. Laiwu Jiahe Fruit and Vegatable Co., Ltd.
53. Laizhou Xubin Fruits and Vegetables
54. Linshu Dading Private Agricultural
Products Co., Ltd.
55. Linyi City Hedong District Jiuli Foodstuff
Co.
56. Linyi City Kangfa Foodstuff Drinkable
Co., Ltd.
57. Linyi Katayama Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
58. Linyi Tianqin Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
59. Ningjin Ruifeng Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
60. Qingdao Apex Shipping Co., Ltd.
61. Qingdao BNP Co., Ltd.
62. Qingdao Cherry Leather Garment Co.,
Ltd.
63. Qingdao Chongzhi International
Transportation Co., Ltd.
64. Qingdao Everfresh Trading Co., Ltd.
65. Qingdao Liang He International Trade
Co., Ltd.
66. Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co.,
Ltd.
67. Qingdao Saturn International Trade Co.,
Ltd.
68. Qingdao Sino-World International
Trading Co., Ltd.
69. Qingdao Winner Foods Co., Ltd.
70. Qingdao XinTian Feng Food Co., Ltd.
71. Qingdao Yuankang International
72. Qufu Dongbao Import & Export Trade Co.,
Ltd.
73. Rizhao Huasai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
74. Samyoung America (Shanghai) Inc.
75. Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce
Trading Co., Ltd.
76. Shandong Chenhe Intl Trading Co., Ltd.
77. Shandong China Bridge Imports
78. Shandong Dongsheng Eastsun Foods Co.,
Ltd.
79. Shandong Garlic Company
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34143
80. Shandong Longtai Fruits and Vegetables
Co., Ltd.
81. Shandong Sanxing Food Co., Ltd.
82. Shandong Wonderland Organic Food Co.,
Ltd.
83. Shandong Xingda Foodstuffs Group Co.,
Ltd.
84. Shandong Yipin Agro (Group) Co., Ltd.
85. Shanghai Ever Rich Trade Company
86. Shanghai Goldenbridge International Co.,
Ltd.
87. Shanghai Great Harvest International Co.,
Ltd.
88. Shanghai LJ International Trading Co.,
Ltd.
89. Shanghai Medicines & Health Products
Import/Export Co., Ltd.
90. Shanghai Yijia International
Transportation Co., Ltd.
91. Shenzhen Fanhui Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
92. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., Ltd.
93. Shenzhen Xunong Trade Co., Ltd.
94. Sunny Import & Export Limited
95. Tangerine International Trading Co.
96. T&S International, LLC.
97. Taian Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd.
98. Taian Fook Huat Tong Kee Pte. Ltd.
99. Taian Solar Summit Food Co., Ltd.
100. Taiyan Ziyang Food Co., Ltd.
101. Tianjin Spiceshi Co., Ltd.
102. U.S. United Logistics (Ningbo) Inc.
103. V.T. Impex (Shandong) Limited
104. Weifang Chenglong Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
105. Weifang He Lu Food Import & Export
Co., Ltd.
106. Weifang Hong Qiao International
Logistics Co., Ltd.
107. Weifang Jinbao Agricultural Equipment
Co., Ltd.
108. Weifang Naike Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
109. Weifang Shennong Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
110. Weihai Textile Group Import & Export
Co., Ltd.
111. WSSF Corporation (Weifang)
112. Xiamen Huamin Import Export
Company
113. Xiamen Keep Top Imp. and Exp. Co.,
Ltd.
114. Xinjiang Top Agricultural Products Co.,
Ltd.
115. XuZhou Heiners Agricultural Co., Ltd.
116. Yishui Hengshun Food Co., Ltd.
117. You Shi Li International Trading Co.,
Ltd.
118. Zhangzhou Xiangcheng Rainbow
Greenland Food Co., Ltd.
119. Zhengzhou Dadi Garlic Industry Co.,
Ltd.
120. Zhengzhou Huachao Industrial Co., Ltd.
121. Zhengzhou Xiwannian Food Co., Ltd.
122. Zhengzhou Xuri Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
123. Zhengzhou Yuanli Trading Co., Ltd.
124. Zhong Lian Farming Product (Qingdao)
Co., Ltd.
Appendix III
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
34144
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Notices
• Comment 1: Whether Golden Bird
Cooperated to the Best of its Ability in
this Review
• Comment 2: Whether Golden Bird
Should Be Part of the PRC-Wide Entity
• Comment 3: Assigned Separate Rate
• Comment 4: Whether Xinboda Should
Have Been Individually Reviewed
• Comment 5: PRC-Wide Rate Challenge
• Comment 6: 15-Day Liquidation
Instruction Policy Challenge
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–14656 Filed 6–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD930
Determination of Overfishing or an
Overfished Condition
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This action serves as a notice
that NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary), has found that
the following stocks are subject to
overfishing or are in an overfished
condition: Gulf of Maine/Northern
Georges Bank red hake, which is
managed by the New England Fishery
Management Council, is now subject to
overfishing, but is not overfished; and
Southeast Florida hogfish, which is
jointly managed by the Gulf of Mexico
and South Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils, is now subject to overfishing
and is in an overfished condition.
NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary,
notifies the appropriate fishery
management council (Council)
whenever it determines that overfishing
is occurring, a stock is in an overfished
condition, a stock is approaching an
overfished condition, or when a
rebuilding plan has not resulted in
adequate progress toward ending
overfishing and rebuilding affected fish
stocks.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina Spallone, (301) 427–8568.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to sections 304(e)(2) and (e)(7) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C.
1854(e)(2) and (e)(7), and implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 600.310(e)(2),
NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary, must
notify Councils whenever it determines
that a stock or stock complex is
overfished or approaching an overfished
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jun 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
condition; or if an existing rebuilding
plan has not ended overfishing or
resulted in adequate rebuilding
progress. NMFS also notifies Councils
when it determines a stock or stock
complex is subject to overfishing.
Section 304(e)(2) further requires NMFS
to publish these notices in the Federal
Register.
NMFS has determined that the Gulf of
Maine/Northern Georges Bank stock of
red hake is now subject to overfishing.
The New England Fishery Management
Council has been informed that they
must end overfishing on this stock.
NMFS has determined that the
Southeast Florida stock of hogfish is
now subject to overfishing and in an
overfished condition. The Southeast
Florida stock of hogfish was recently
identified as a separate stock among a
total of three hogfish stocks. The Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
and the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council have been
informed that they must end overfishing
and rebuild the Southeast Florida stock
of hogfish.
Dated: June 9, 2015.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–14625 Filed 6–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD934
Fisheries of the South Atlantic;
Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 41 pre Data
Workshop II webinar.
AGENCY:
The SEDAR 41 assessments of
the South Atlantic stocks of red snapper
and gray triggerfish will consist of a
series of workshops and webinars: Data
Workshops; an Assessment Process; and
a Review Workshop. This notice is for
a webinar associated with the Data
portion of the SEDAR process. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: A SEDAR 41 pre Data Workshop
II webinar will be held on Wednesday,
July 1, 2015, from 9 a.m. until 12 p.m.
The established times may be adjusted
as necessary to accommodate the timely
completion of discussion relevant to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
assessment process. Such adjustments
may result in the meeting being
extended from, or completed prior to
the time established by this notice.
ADDRESSES:
Meeting address: The meeting will be
held via webinar. The webinar is open
to members of the public. Those
interested in participating should
contact Julia Byrd at SEDAR (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT below) to
request an invitation providing webinar
access information. Please request
webinar invitations at least 24 hours in
advance of each webinar.
SEDAR address: 4055 Faber Place
Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC
29405.
Julia
Byrd, SEDAR Coordinator; phone: (843)
571–4366; email: julia.byrd@safmc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf
of Mexico, South Atlantic, and
Caribbean Fishery Management
Councils, in conjunction with NOAA
Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commissions,
have implemented the Southeast Data,
Assessment and Review (SEDAR)
process, a multi-step method for
determining the status of fish stocks in
the Southeast Region. SEDAR is a threestep process including: (1) Data
Workshop(s); (2) Assessment Process;
and (3) Review Workshop. The product
of the Data Workshop(s) is a data report
which compiles and evaluates potential
datasets and recommends which
datasets are appropriate for assessment
analyses. The product of the Assessment
Process is a stock assessment report
which describes the fisheries, evaluates
the status of the stock, estimates
biological benchmarks, projects future
population conditions, and recommends
research and monitoring needs. The
assessment is independently peer
reviewed at the Review Workshop. The
product of the Review Workshop is a
Summary documenting panel opinions
regarding the strengths and weaknesses
of the stock assessment and input data.
Participants for SEDAR Workshops are
appointed by the Gulf of Mexico, South
Atlantic, and Caribbean Fishery
Management Councils and NOAA
Fisheries Southeast Regional Office,
Highly Migratory Species Management
Division, and Southeast Fisheries
Science Center. Participants include:
Data collectors and database managers;
stock assessment scientists, biologists,
and researchers; constituency
representatives including fishermen,
environmentalists, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs);
international experts; and staff of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34141-34144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14656]
[[Page 34141]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-831]
Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final Results
and Partial Rescission of the 19th Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 8, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published its preliminary results of the 2012-2013
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ The period of review is
November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013. The mandatory respondents
in this review are: Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd. (Golden Bird)
and Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. (Hejia). Following the Preliminary
Results, we invited interested parties to comment. We have made no
changes for these final results of the antidumping duty administrative
review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the Nineteenth Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 72625 (December 8, 2014)
(Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed below, the Department is relying on total adverse
facts available with respect to the PRC-wide entity, which includes
Golden Bird and Hejia, because both failed to cooperate to the best of
their ability in this administrative review. The Department is also
finding 16 companies had no shipments during the period of review.
These determinations and the final dumping margins are discussed below
in the ``Final Results'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: June 15, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Czajkowski, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1395.
Background
Since the Department published the preliminary results of this
administrative review,\2\ Golden Bird and Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial
Co. Ltd. (Xinboda) submitted case briefs on January 19 and 20, 2015,
respectively. On January 29, 2015, Petitioners \3\ submitted a rebuttal
brief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Id.
\3\ Petitioners consist of the following companies: The Fresh
Garlic Producers Association and its individual members: Christopher
Ranch L.L.C., The Garlic Company, Valley Garlic, and Vessey and
Company, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products subject to this antidumping duty order are all grades
of garlic, whole or separated into constituent cloves, whether or not
peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, provisionally preserved, or packed in
water or other neutral substance, but not prepared or preserved by the
addition of other ingredients or heat processing. Fresh garlic that are
subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010, 0703.200020,
0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, and
2005.90.9700. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written product description remains
dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained
in the Issues and Decision memorandum dated concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, regarding ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Fresh Garlic from
the People's Republic of China; 2012-2013 Administrative Review,''
issued concurrently with this notice (Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently and is
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that are raised in
the briefs and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is in
Appendix III of this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the
Department's Central Records Unit, located in Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be found at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and the electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
For the final results, based on analysis of the comments received
and our review of the record, the Department has made no changes to the
Preliminary Results. Detailed discussions of the issues raised by
parties can be found in the Decision Memorandum.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As discussed in the Preliminary Results, 16 companies timely
certified that they had no shipments during the period of review. After
reviewing these certifications with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) and examining CBP shipment data, the Department preliminary found
that these companies did not have reviewable transactions during the
POR.\5\ Since the Preliminary Results, the Department has not received
comments or information that would warrant a review of this preliminary
finding. As such, for these final results, the Department finds that
the 16 companies listed in Appendix I had no shipments during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results at 72627.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity
As discussed in the Preliminary Results, the Department
preliminarily determined that 124 companies are part of the PRC-wide
entity.\6\ In addition to the two mandatory respondents who failed to
cooperate to the best of their ability to comply with requested
information, the Department also found that 92 of the companies whose
review requests were withdrawn had not been assigned a separate rate
from a prior segment of the proceeding, and thus were considered part
of the PRC-wide entity. Further, an additional 30 companies, for which
a review was requested, and not withdrawn, did not file a separate rate
application or certification, nor did they file a no shipments
certification. Accordingly, the Department preliminarily determined
these companies to be part of the PRC-wide entity. As discussed in
detail in the Decision Memorandum, the Department continues to find
Golden Bird to be part of the PRC-wide entity. Other than from Golden
Bird, the Department has not received comments or information that
would warrant a review of the preliminary decision to consider these
companies part of the PRC-wide entity. Thus, for these final results,
the Department continues to find all 124 companies to be part of the
PRC-wide entity. A full list of
[[Page 34142]]
companies determined to be part of the PRC-wide entity can be found in
Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Id. at 72626.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, the Department found that non-selected
companies Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co, Ltd.;
Jinxiang Richfar Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Lianghe
International Trade Co., Ltd.; Shandong Chenhe International Trading
Co., Ltd.; Xinboda; Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd.
and XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd. demonstrated their
eligibility for separate rates.\7\ Since the Preliminary Results, the
Department has not received any comments that would warrant a review of
these preliminary findings. Therefore, we continue to find that these
companies are eligible for separate rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Id. at 72626, 72627.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), nor the
Department's regulations address the establishment of the rate applied
to individual companies not selected for examination where the
Department limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant
to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The Department's practice in cases
involving limited selection based on exporters accounting for the
largest volumes of exports has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the
Act for guidance, which provides instructions for calculating the all-
others rate in an investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
instructs the Department to avoid calculating an all-others rate using
any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that, where all
rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, the
Department may use ``any reasonable method'' for assigning an all-
others rate.
We determine that, consistent with our Preliminary Results, the
rate for non-selected companies eligible for separate rates should be
based on the rate used for non-selected separate rate companies in the
most recently completed administrative review under this order. This is
consistent with precedent and is a reasonable method to determine this
rate in the instant review. Pursuant to this method, we are assigning
the rate of $1.82 per kilogram to non-selected companies eligible for
separate rates, which is from the most recently completed
administrative review under this order.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results and Partial Rescission of the 18th Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 79 FR 36721 (June 30, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
The Department determines that the following dumping margins exist
for the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
margin
Exporter (dollars
per
kilogram)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd....... 1.82
Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd............... 1.82
Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co., Ltd................ 1.82
Shandong Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd.............. 1.82
Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd........................ 1.82
Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd........... 1.82
XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd...................... 1.82
PRC-Wide Rate \9\........................................... 4.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Includes Golden Bird and Hejia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
the Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise, where applicable, in
accordance with the final results of this review. The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions for such
producers/exporters directly to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Department will direct CBP to assess importer-specific
assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit (i.e., per kilogram)
amount on each entry of the subject merchandise during the POR. For
entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by
an exporter individually examined during this review, the Department
will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate.
Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at the
exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above,
the cash deposit rate will be the weighted-average dumping margins
indicated above (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero
cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a
separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise
that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of $4.71 per kilogram; and (4)
for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an
Administrative Protective Order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
[[Page 34143]]
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
These final results are issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: June 5, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I
Companies That Have Certified No Shipments
1. Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.
2. Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd.
3. Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.
5. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd.
6. Jinxiang Chengda Import & Export Co., Ltd.
7. Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd.
8. Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co., Ltd.
9. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd.
10. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.
11. Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd.
12. Qingdao Sea-line International Trading Co.
13. Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd.
14. Qingdao Xiantianfeng Foods Co., Ltd. or Xi Tian Feng
15. Xuzhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd.
16. Yantai Jinyan Trading Inc.
Appendix II
List of Companies Subject to the PRC-Wide Rate
1. American Pioneer Shipping
2. Anhui Dongqian Foods Ltd.
3. Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd.
4. Anqiu Haoshun Trade Co., Ltd.
5. APM Global Logistics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
6. APS Qingdao
7. Chiping Shengkang Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
8. CMEC Engineering Machinery Import & Export Co., Ltd.
9. Dalian New Century Food Co., Ltd.
10. Dongying Shunyifa Chemical Co., Ltd.
11. Dynalink Systems Logistics (Qingdao) Inc.
12. Eimskip Logistics Inc.
13. Feicheng Acid Chemicals Co., Ltd.
14. Foshan Fuyi Food Co, Ltd.
15. Frog World Co., Ltd.
16. Golden Bridge International, Inc.
17. Goodwave Technology Development Ltd.
18. Guangxi Lin Si Fu Bang Trade Co., Ltd
19. Hangzhou Guanyu Foods Co., Ltd.
20. Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd.
21. Hejiahuan (Zhongshan) Electrical AP
22. Henan Weite Industrial Co., Ltd.
23. Heze Ever-Best International Trade Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Shandong
Heze International Trade and Developing Company)
24. Hongkong Golden Eagle Group Ltd.
25. Hongqiao International Logistics Co.
26. Intecs Logistics Service Co., Ltd.
27. IT Logistics Qingdao Branch
28. Jinan Solar Summit International Co., Ltd.
29. Jinan Yipin Corporation Ltd.
30. Jining De-Rain Trading Co., Ltd.
31. Jining Highton Trading Co., Ltd.
32. Jining Jiulong International Trading Co., Ltd.
33. Jining Tiankuang Trade Co., Ltd.
34. Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd.
35. Jinxiang County Huaguang Food Import & Export Co., Ltd.
36. Jinxiang Dacheng Food Co., Ltd.
37. Jinxiang Dongyun Freezing Storage Co., Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang
Eastward Shipping Import and Export Limited Company)
38. Jinxiang Dongyun Import & Export Co., Ltd.
39. Jinxiang Fengsheng Import & Export Co., Ltd.
40. Jinxiang Grand Agricultural Co., Ltd.
41. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd.
42. Jinxiang Infarm Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd.
43. Jinxiang Meihua Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.
44. Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing Storage Co., Ltd.
45. Jinxiang Shenglong Trade Co., Ltd.
46. Jinxiang Tianheng Trade Co., Ltd.
47. Jinxiang Tianma Freezing Storage Co., Ltd.
48. Jinxiang Xian Baishite Trade Co., Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang Best
Trade Co., Ltd.)
49. Juye Homestead Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd.
50. Kingwin Industrial Co., Ltd.
51. Laiwu Fukai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
52. Laiwu Jiahe Fruit and Vegatable Co., Ltd.
53. Laizhou Xubin Fruits and Vegetables
54. Linshu Dading Private Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.
55. Linyi City Hedong District Jiuli Foodstuff Co.
56. Linyi City Kangfa Foodstuff Drinkable Co., Ltd.
57. Linyi Katayama Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
58. Linyi Tianqin Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
59. Ningjin Ruifeng Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
60. Qingdao Apex Shipping Co., Ltd.
61. Qingdao BNP Co., Ltd.
62. Qingdao Cherry Leather Garment Co., Ltd.
63. Qingdao Chongzhi International Transportation Co., Ltd.
64. Qingdao Everfresh Trading Co., Ltd.
65. Qingdao Liang He International Trade Co., Ltd.
66. Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co., Ltd.
67. Qingdao Saturn International Trade Co., Ltd.
68. Qingdao Sino-World International Trading Co., Ltd.
69. Qingdao Winner Foods Co., Ltd.
70. Qingdao XinTian Feng Food Co., Ltd.
71. Qingdao Yuankang International
72. Qufu Dongbao Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd.
73. Rizhao Huasai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
74. Samyoung America (Shanghai) Inc.
75. Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce Trading Co., Ltd.
76. Shandong Chenhe Intl Trading Co., Ltd.
77. Shandong China Bridge Imports
78. Shandong Dongsheng Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd.
79. Shandong Garlic Company
80. Shandong Longtai Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd.
81. Shandong Sanxing Food Co., Ltd.
82. Shandong Wonderland Organic Food Co., Ltd.
83. Shandong Xingda Foodstuffs Group Co., Ltd.
84. Shandong Yipin Agro (Group) Co., Ltd.
85. Shanghai Ever Rich Trade Company
86. Shanghai Goldenbridge International Co., Ltd.
87. Shanghai Great Harvest International Co., Ltd.
88. Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., Ltd.
89. Shanghai Medicines & Health Products Import/Export Co., Ltd.
90. Shanghai Yijia International Transportation Co., Ltd.
91. Shenzhen Fanhui Import & Export Co., Ltd.
92. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., Ltd.
93. Shenzhen Xunong Trade Co., Ltd.
94. Sunny Import & Export Limited
95. Tangerine International Trading Co.
96. T&S International, LLC.
97. Taian Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd.
98. Taian Fook Huat Tong Kee Pte. Ltd.
99. Taian Solar Summit Food Co., Ltd.
100. Taiyan Ziyang Food Co., Ltd.
101. Tianjin Spiceshi Co., Ltd.
102. U.S. United Logistics (Ningbo) Inc.
103. V.T. Impex (Shandong) Limited
104. Weifang Chenglong Import & Export Co., Ltd.
105. Weifang He Lu Food Import & Export Co., Ltd.
106. Weifang Hong Qiao International Logistics Co., Ltd.
107. Weifang Jinbao Agricultural Equipment Co., Ltd.
108. Weifang Naike Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
109. Weifang Shennong Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
110. Weihai Textile Group Import & Export Co., Ltd.
111. WSSF Corporation (Weifang)
112. Xiamen Huamin Import Export Company
113. Xiamen Keep Top Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd.
114. Xinjiang Top Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.
115. XuZhou Heiners Agricultural Co., Ltd.
116. Yishui Hengshun Food Co., Ltd.
117. You Shi Li International Trading Co., Ltd.
118. Zhangzhou Xiangcheng Rainbow Greenland Food Co., Ltd.
119. Zhengzhou Dadi Garlic Industry Co., Ltd.
120. Zhengzhou Huachao Industrial Co., Ltd.
121. Zhengzhou Xiwannian Food Co., Ltd.
122. Zhengzhou Xuri Import & Export Co., Ltd.
123. Zhengzhou Yuanli Trading Co., Ltd.
124. Zhong Lian Farming Product (Qingdao) Co., Ltd.
Appendix III
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
[[Page 34144]]
Comment 1: Whether Golden Bird Cooperated to the Best
of its Ability in this Review
Comment 2: Whether Golden Bird Should Be Part of the
PRC-Wide Entity
Comment 3: Assigned Separate Rate
Comment 4: Whether Xinboda Should Have Been
Individually Reviewed
Comment 5: PRC-Wide Rate Challenge
Comment 6: 15-Day Liquidation Instruction Policy
Challenge
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-14656 Filed 6-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
