Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review in Part; 2012-2013, 33246-33248 [2015-14365]
Download as PDF
33246
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices
required by 50 CFR 216.24(f)(2), the
NOAA Form 370 must accompany all
imported shipments of an item with an
HTS number listed in that section
harvested by or imported from a largescale driftnet nation.
As of the effective date of this notice,
a certification by an Italian Government
representative attesting that the fish or
fish products were not harvested by a
large-scale driftnet on the high seas will
no longer be required in Section 7 of the
NOAA Form 370 for the HTS numbers
specified in 50 CFR 216.24(f)(2)(i) and
(ii). Furthermore, a NOAA Form 370
will no longer be required for any
importation from Italy for the non-tuna
fish and fish products classified with
the HTS numbers specified at 50 CFR
216.24(f)(2)(iii).
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Eileen Sobeck,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
required to determine eligibility
pursuant to 50 CFR part 253 and to
determine the type and amount of
assistance requested by the applicant.
An annual financial statement is
required from the recipients to monitor
the financial status of the loan.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals or
households.
Frequency: Annually and on occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: June 5, 2015.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–14326 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
[FR Doc. 2015–14238 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am]
the purposes of selecting candidates for
its research internship program in
partnership with the University of
Hawaii. The application package would
contain: (1) A form requesting
information on academic background
and professional experiences, (2)
reference forms in support of the
internship application by two
educational or professional references,
and (3) a support letter from one
academic professor or advisor.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; not-for-profit institutions.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Dated: June 5, 2015.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[FR Doc. 2015–14239 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Fisheries Finance Program
Requirements.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0012.
Form Number(s): NOAA 88–1.
Type of Request: Regular (extension of
a currently approved information
collection).
Number of Respondents: 451.
Average Hours per Response:
Applications, 10 hours; annual financial
statements from current borrowers, 2
hours.
Burden Hours: 1,502.
Needs and Uses: This request is for
extension of a currently approved
information collection.
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
operates a direct loan program to assist
in financing certain actions relating to
commercial fishing vessels, shoreside
fishery facilities, aquaculture
operations, and individual fishing
quotas. Application information is
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jun 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
International Trade Administration
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration’s
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National
Monument and University of Hawaii
Research Internship Program
OMB Control Number: 0648–xxxx.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular (request for
a new information collection).
Number of Respondents: 20.
Average Hours per Response: 1 hour
each for applications, references and
support letters.
Burden Hours: 80.
Needs and Uses: This request is for a
new collection of information. The
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration’s (NOAA’s)
¯
¯
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National
Monument (PMNM) would like to
collect student data and information for
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A–570–891]
Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Rescission
of Review in Part; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 8, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order 1 on hand
trucks and certain parts thereof (hand
trucks) from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC).2 The period of review
(POR) is December 1, 2012, through
November 30, 2013. This administrative
review covers three exporters of the
AGENCY:
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Hand
Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s
Republic of China, 69 FR 70122 (December 2, 2004).
2 See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 53167 (September 8,
2014) (Preliminary Results).
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices
subject merchandise: New-Tec
Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. (NewTec); Yangjiang Shunhe Industrial Co.
(Shunhe); and Full Merit Enterprise
Limited (Full Merit).
Based upon our analysis of the
comments and information received
following the Preliminary Results, we
made changes to the margin calculations
for these final results. The final
dumping margin is listed below in the
‘‘Final Results of the Review’’ section of
this notice. We continue to find that
Shunhe is part of the PRC-wide entity
(see ‘‘No Shipments Claim,’’ infra). In
addition, we are rescinding this review
with respect to Full Merit at this time
(see ‘‘Rescission of Review, in Part,’’
infra).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Hoefke, or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4947 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
DATES: Effective Date: June 11, 2015.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On September 8, 2014, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the Preliminary Results of the
2012–2013 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on hand trucks
from the PRC. In accordance with 19
CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties
to comment on our Preliminary Results.
On October 8, 2014, Cosco Home and
Office Products (Cosco), a U.S. importer,
submitted a case brief. No other
comments were submitted to the
Department.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
consists of hand trucks manufactured
from any material, whether assembled
or unassembled, complete or
incomplete, suitable for any use, and
certain parts thereof, namely the vertical
frame, the handling area and the
projecting edges or toe plate, and any
combination thereof. They are typically
imported under heading 8716.80.50.10
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS), although
they may also be imported under
heading 8716.80.50.90 and
8716.90.50.60. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written product description remains
dispositive. A full description of the
scope of the order is contained in the
Final Issues and Decision Memorandum
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jun 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
dated concurrently with and hereby
adopted by this notice.3
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by parties in this
administrative review are listed in the
Appendix to this notice and addressed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this review and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum, which is electronically
available via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).4
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room 7046, of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed and electronic versions of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
No Shipments Claim
Shunhe submitted certifications of no
shipments. Because Shunhe was, at the
outset of this administrative review, and
continues to be part of the PRC-wide
entity in this administrative review, the
Department did not make a
determination of no shipments.5
Subsequent to the Preliminary Results,
the Department did not receive any
information that indicated anything to
the contrary. The Department therefore
finds for these final results that Shunhe
continues to remain part of the PRCwide entity.
Rescission of Review, in Part
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department noted that it would rescind
the review with respect to Full Merit in
the final results if the PRC-wide entity
did not come under review in this
3 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
‘‘Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013’’ (Issues
and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently
with and adopted by this notice, for a complete
description of the Scope of the Order.
4 On November 2, 2014, Enforcement and
Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and
Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
The Web site location was changed from https://
iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov. The
Final Rule changing the references to the
regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November
20, 2014).
5 See Preliminary Results and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33247
administrative review. Subsequent to
the Preliminary Results, the Department
did not receive any comments or
information which indicated that Full
Merit or the PRC-wide entity should be
reviewed. Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the
administrative review with respect to
this company.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from an interested
party regarding our Preliminary Results,
we made certain revisions to the margin
calculations for New-Tec. Specifically,
the Department adjusted financial ratio
calculations for surrogate values and
adjusted the surrogate values for
energy.6
Separate Rates Determination
In our Preliminary Results, we
determined that New-Tec met the
criteria for separate rate status. We have
not received any information since the
issuance of the Preliminary Results that
provides a basis for reconsidering this
preliminary finding. Therefore, the
Department continues to find that NewTec meets the criteria for a separate rate.
Final Results of the Review
The Department determines that the
following final dumping margin exists
for the period December 1, 2012,
through November 30, 2013:
Exporter
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
New-Tec Integration
(Xiamen) Co., Ltd ..............
0.00
Disclosure
The Department will disclose to
parties in this proceeding the
calculations performed within five days
after the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department
determines, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise and
deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable, in accordance with the final
results of this review. The Department
6 See Issues and Decisions Memorandum; see also
Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Analysis for the Final
Results of Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof
from the People’s Republic of China: New-Tec’’
(January 6, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
33248
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review. Because we have calculated
a zero margin for New-Tec in the final
results of this review, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
On October 24, 2011, the Department
announced a refinement to its
assessment practice in NME cases.7
Pursuant to this refinement in practice,
for entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales databases submitted by
companies individually examined
during this review, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at
the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the
Department determines that an exporter
under review had no shipments of the
subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the
PRC-wide rate.8
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject
merchandise exported by New-Tec,
which has a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be that established in
the final results of this review, except,
if the rate is zero or de minimis, then
zero cash deposit will be required; (2)
for any previously reviewed or
investigated PRC and non-PRC exporter
not listed above that received a separate
rate in a previous segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters
that have not been found to be entitled
to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be that for the PRC-wide entity (i.e.,
383.60 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied the non-PRC exporter. These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
7 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
8 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jun 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
final results of administrative review
and notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Comments Discussed in the
Accompanying Final Issues and Decision
Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
No Shipments Claim
Rescission in Part
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether to use TS Steel’s
Financial Statement
Comment 2: Whether to use Thai Trolley’s
Financial Statement
Comment 3: Use of Jenbunjerd’s Financial
Statement
Comment 4: Surrogate Values for Energy
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–14365 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2011–0019]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request—Safety
Standard for Portable Bed Rails
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’) of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the Consumer
Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CPSC’’) announces
that the Commission has submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of
approval of a collection of information
associated with the CPSC’s Safety
Standard for Portable Bed Rails (OMB
No. 3041–0149). In the Federal Register
of March 19, 2015 (80 FR 14367), the
CPSC published a notice to announce
the agency’s intention to seek extension
of approval of the collection of
information. The Commission received
no comments. Therefore, by publication
of this notice, the Commission
announces that CPSC has submitted to
the OMB a request for extension of
approval of that collection of
information, without change.
DATES: Written comments on this
request for extension of approval of
information collection requirements
should be submitted by July 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments about
this request by email: OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202–
395–6881. Comments by mail should be
sent to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the CPSC, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503. In addition, written comments
that are sent to OMB also should be
submitted electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2011–0019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact: Robert H.
Squibb, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504–7815, or
by email to: rsquibb@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC has
submitted the following currently
approved collection of information to
OMB for extension:
Title: Safety Standard for Portable Bed
Rails.
OMB Number: 3041–0149.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33246-33248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14365]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-891]
Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic
of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission of Review in Part; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 8, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order \1\ on hand
trucks and certain parts thereof (hand trucks) from the People's
Republic of China (PRC).\2\ The period of review (POR) is December 1,
2012, through November 30, 2013. This administrative review covers
three exporters of the
[[Page 33247]]
subject merchandise: New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. (New-Tec);
Yangjiang Shunhe Industrial Co. (Shunhe); and Full Merit Enterprise
Limited (Full Merit).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Hand Trucks and
Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China, 69 FR
70122 (December 2, 2004).
\2\ See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 53167 (September 8, 2014)
(Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based upon our analysis of the comments and information received
following the Preliminary Results, we made changes to the margin
calculations for these final results. The final dumping margin is
listed below in the ``Final Results of the Review'' section of this
notice. We continue to find that Shunhe is part of the PRC-wide entity
(see ``No Shipments Claim,'' infra). In addition, we are rescinding
this review with respect to Full Merit at this time (see ``Rescission
of Review, in Part,'' infra).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke, or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4947 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
DATES: Effective Date: June 11, 2015.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 8, 2014, the Department published in the Federal
Register the Preliminary Results of the 2012-2013 administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on hand trucks from the PRC. In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to comment
on our Preliminary Results. On October 8, 2014, Cosco Home and Office
Products (Cosco), a U.S. importer, submitted a case brief. No other
comments were submitted to the Department.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order consists of hand trucks
manufactured from any material, whether assembled or unassembled,
complete or incomplete, suitable for any use, and certain parts
thereof, namely the vertical frame, the handling area and the
projecting edges or toe plate, and any combination thereof. They are
typically imported under heading 8716.80.50.10 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), although they may also be
imported under heading 8716.80.50.90 and 8716.90.50.60. Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written product description remains dispositive. A full description
of the scope of the order is contained in the Final Issues and Decision
Memorandum dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, ``Hand Trucks and
Certain Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012-2013'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice, for a complete
description of the Scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by parties in this administrative review are
listed in the Appendix to this notice and addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. Parties can find a complete discussion of all
issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum, which is electronically available via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\4\ ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046, of the main Department
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ On November 2, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the
name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The Web site location was
changed from https://iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov.
The Final Rule changing the references to the regulations can be
found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Shipments Claim
Shunhe submitted certifications of no shipments. Because Shunhe
was, at the outset of this administrative review, and continues to be
part of the PRC-wide entity in this administrative review, the
Department did not make a determination of no shipments.\5\ Subsequent
to the Preliminary Results, the Department did not receive any
information that indicated anything to the contrary. The Department
therefore finds for these final results that Shunhe continues to remain
part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Review, in Part
In the Preliminary Results, the Department noted that it would
rescind the review with respect to Full Merit in the final results if
the PRC-wide entity did not come under review in this administrative
review. Subsequent to the Preliminary Results, the Department did not
receive any comments or information which indicated that Full Merit or
the PRC-wide entity should be reviewed. Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the administrative review with respect
to this company.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from an
interested party regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain
revisions to the margin calculations for New-Tec. Specifically, the
Department adjusted financial ratio calculations for surrogate values
and adjusted the surrogate values for energy.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Issues and Decisions Memorandum; see also Memorandum to
the File, ``Analysis for the Final Results of Hand Trucks and
Certain Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: New-Tec''
(January 6, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates Determination
In our Preliminary Results, we determined that New-Tec met the
criteria for separate rate status. We have not received any information
since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for
reconsidering this preliminary finding. Therefore, the Department
continues to find that New-Tec meets the criteria for a separate rate.
Final Results of the Review
The Department determines that the following final dumping margin
exists for the period December 1, 2012, through November 30, 2013:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Exporter average margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd.................. 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
The Department will disclose to parties in this proceeding the
calculations performed within five days after the date of publication
of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department determines,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise and deposits
of estimated duties, where applicable, in accordance with the final
results of this review. The Department
[[Page 33248]]
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of the final results of this review.
Because we have calculated a zero margin for New-Tec in the final
results of this review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
On October 24, 2011, the Department announced a refinement to its
assessment practice in NME cases.\7\ Pursuant to this refinement in
practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales
databases submitted by companies individually examined during this
review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at
the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an
exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any
suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e.,
at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported
by New-Tec, which has a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be
that established in the final results of this review, except, if the
rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required;
(2) for any previously reviewed or investigated PRC and non-PRC
exporter not listed above that received a separate rate in a previous
segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters that
have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit
rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 383.60 percent); and
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied the non-PRC exporter.
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this final results of administrative
review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Comments Discussed in the Accompanying Final Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
No Shipments Claim
Rescission in Part
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether to use TS Steel's Financial Statement
Comment 2: Whether to use Thai Trolley's Financial Statement
Comment 3: Use of Jenbunjerd's Financial Statement
Comment 4: Surrogate Values for Energy
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-14365 Filed 6-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P