Tireco, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 33333-33334 [2015-14256]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. BMW’s Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), BMW submitted a
petition for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that
this noncompliance is inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of BMW’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Vehicles Involved
Affected are approximately 13,899
MY 2013 BMW 5 Series sedan passenger
cars manufactured between January 30,
2013 and June 28, 2013.
III. Noncompliance
BMW explains that the
noncompliance is that some of the rear
reflex reflectors on the affected vehicles
do not fully conform to the minimum
photometry performance required by
paragraph S8.1.11 of FMVSS No. 108.
IV. Rule Text
Paragraph S8.1.11 of FMVSS No. 108
requires in pertinent part:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
S8.1.11 Photometry. Each reflex reflector
must be designed to conform to the
photometry requirements of Table XVI–a
when tested according to the procedure of
S14.2.3 for the reflex reflector color as
specified by this section.
V. Summary of BMW’s Analyses
BMW used Ricco’s Law to determine
a minimum required reflection
coefficient in its analysis. BMW chose
Ricco’s Law because they believe it best
corresponds to the human physiological
condition in which a light source of a
given size and intensity is minimally
capable (i.e. illumination threshold) of
producing visual perception.
As such, BMW created a graph
whereby the y-axis represented the
reflection coefficient in units consistent
with FMVSS No. 108. While the x-axis
represented the distance between two
vehicles in order to simulate the
condition of an approaching vehicle and
a parked or stopped vehicle.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jun 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
BMW provided the graph to illustrate
that even with parameters representing
a ‘‘worst-case scenario,’’ sufficient
visibility of the rear reflex reflectors of
the affected vehicles exists.
BMW stated that it has not received
any contacts from vehicle owners or
other road users regarding issues related
to the subject noncompliance and is also
not aware of any accidents or injuries
that have occurred as a result of this
issue.
BMW has additionally informed
NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that subsequent
vehicle production will conform to
paragraph 8.1.11 of FMVSS No. 108.
In summation, BMW believes that the
described noncompliance of the subject
vehicles is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition, to
exempt BMW from providing recall
notification of noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and
remedying the recall noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be
granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject vehicles that BMW no longer
controlled at the time it determined that
the noncompliance existed. However,
any decision on this petition does not
relieve vehicle distributors and dealers
of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after BMW notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8).
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–14254 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33333
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0041; Notice 1]
Tireco, Inc., Receipt of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Tireco, Inc., (Tireco) has
determined that certain Tireco
replacement tires do not fully comply
with paragraph S6.5(b) of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor
Vehicles with a GVWR of More than
4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) and
Motorcycles. Tireco has filed an
appropriate report dated March 30,
2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is July 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of
this notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
hand to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by: logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202)
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that your comments were
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
33334
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices
received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Tireco’s Petition: Pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556),
Tireco submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Tireco’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Tires Involved: Affected are
approximately 1,600 Tireco brand
Power King Traction size 8.25–20E/10,
Power King Traction size 9.00–20 E/10,
Milestar Traction size 8.25–20 E/10, and
Milestar Traction size 9.00–20 E/10
replacement tires. These tires were
manufactured between March 1, 2014
and March 22, 2015.
III. Noncompliance: Tireco explains
that the noncompliance is that the Tire
Information Numbers (TINs) required to
be marked on the tire sidewalls by
paragraph S6.5(b) of FMVSS No. 119 are
incomplete because they do not include
the tire size codes required by 49 CFR
part 574.5(b).
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S6.5 of
FMVSS No. 119 requires in pertinent
part:
S6.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in
this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on
each sidewall with the information in
paragraph (a) through (j) of this section. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jun 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
markings shall be placed between the
maximum section width (exclusive of
sidewall decorations or curb ribs) and the
bead on at least one sidewall, unless the
maximum section width of the tire is located
in an area which is not more than one-fourth
of the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire. If the maximum section width
falls within that area, the markings shall
appear between the bead and a point one-half
the distance from the bead to the shoulder of
the tire, on at least one sidewall. The
markings shall be in letters and numerals not
less than 2 mm (0.078 inch) high and raised
above or sunk below the tire surface not less
than 0.4 mm (0.015 inch), except that the
marking depth shall be not less than 0.25mm
(0.010 inch) in the case of motorcycle tires.
The tire identification and the DOT symbol
labeling shall comply with part 574 of this
chapter. Markings may appear on only one
sidewall and the entire sidewall area may be
used in the case of motorcycle tires and
recreational, boat, baggage, and special trailer
tires . . .
(b) The tire identification number required
by part 574 of this chapter. This number may
be marked on only one sidewall.
V. Summary of TIRECO’s Analyses:
Tireco state its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons:
(A) Tireco believes that the absence of
the tire size code from the TIN has no
impact on the operational performance
of the subject tires or on the safety of
vehicles on which the subject tires are
mounted because the subject tires meet
or exceed all of the applicable
performance requirements specified by
FMVSS No. 119.
(B) Tireco states that even though the
size code is absent from the TIN, the tire
size information is readily available to
consumers in a more understandable
way by virtue of the actual tire size
marking on the sidewalls.
(C) Tireco also states that in the
unlikely event that any of the subject
tires are ever found to contain a defect
or a substantive noncompliance that
would warrant a recall, the recalled tires
could be adequately identified through
the partial [T]IN that is stamped on the
sidewall.
(D) Tireco referenced
inconsequentiality petitions NHTSA has
previously granted in the past that have
addressed what it believes are similar
issues.
Tireco is not aware of any crashes,
injuries, customer complaints, or field
reports associated with the subject
noncompliance.
Tireco has additionally informed
NHTSA that the fabricating
manufacturer has corrected the molds at
the manufacturing plant so that no
additional tires will be manufactured
with the noncompliance.
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In summation, Tireco believes that the
described noncompliance of the subject
tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety, and that its petition, to exempt
Tireco from providing recall notification
of noncompliance as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject tires that Tireco no longer
controlled at the time it determined that
the noncompliance existed. However,
any decision on this petition does not
relieve tire distributors and dealers of
the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant tires under their
control after Tireco notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8).
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–14256 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0125; Notice 1]
General Motors, LLC, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
General Motors, LLC, (GM)
has determined that certain model year
(MY) 2015 GMC multipurpose
passenger vehicles (MPV) do not fully
comply with paragraph S7.8.5 of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment. GM
has filed an appropriate report dated
November 5, 2014, pursuant to 49 CFR
part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33333-33334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14256]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0041; Notice 1]
Tireco, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Tireco, Inc., (Tireco) has determined that certain Tireco
replacement tires do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(b) of Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires for
Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of More than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds)
and Motorcycles. Tireco has filed an appropriate report dated March 30,
2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is July 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were
[[Page 33334]]
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Tireco's Petition: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)
(see implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), Tireco submitted a petition
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Tireco's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Tires Involved: Affected are approximately 1,600 Tireco brand
Power King Traction size 8.25-20E/10, Power King Traction size 9.00-20
E/10, Milestar Traction size 8.25-20 E/10, and Milestar Traction size
9.00-20 E/10 replacement tires. These tires were manufactured between
March 1, 2014 and March 22, 2015.
III. Noncompliance: Tireco explains that the noncompliance is that
the Tire Information Numbers (TINs) required to be marked on the tire
sidewalls by paragraph S6.5(b) of FMVSS No. 119 are incomplete because
they do not include the tire size codes required by 49 CFR part
574.5(b).
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S6.5 of FMVSS No. 119 requires in
pertinent part:
S6.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in this paragraph, each
tire shall be marked on each sidewall with the information in
paragraph (a) through (j) of this section. The markings shall be
placed between the maximum section width (exclusive of sidewall
decorations or curb ribs) and the bead on at least one sidewall,
unless the maximum section width of the tire is located in an area
which is not more than one-fourth of the distance from the bead to
the shoulder of the tire. If the maximum section width falls within
that area, the markings shall appear between the bead and a point
one-half the distance from the bead to the shoulder of the tire, on
at least one sidewall. The markings shall be in letters and numerals
not less than 2 mm (0.078 inch) high and raised above or sunk below
the tire surface not less than 0.4 mm (0.015 inch), except that the
marking depth shall be not less than 0.25mm (0.010 inch) in the case
of motorcycle tires. The tire identification and the DOT symbol
labeling shall comply with part 574 of this chapter. Markings may
appear on only one sidewall and the entire sidewall area may be used
in the case of motorcycle tires and recreational, boat, baggage, and
special trailer tires . . .
(b) The tire identification number required by part 574 of this
chapter. This number may be marked on only one sidewall.
V. Summary of TIRECO's Analyses: Tireco state its belief that the
subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for
the following reasons:
(A) Tireco believes that the absence of the tire size code from the
TIN has no impact on the operational performance of the subject tires
or on the safety of vehicles on which the subject tires are mounted
because the subject tires meet or exceed all of the applicable
performance requirements specified by FMVSS No. 119.
(B) Tireco states that even though the size code is absent from the
TIN, the tire size information is readily available to consumers in a
more understandable way by virtue of the actual tire size marking on
the sidewalls.
(C) Tireco also states that in the unlikely event that any of the
subject tires are ever found to contain a defect or a substantive
noncompliance that would warrant a recall, the recalled tires could be
adequately identified through the partial [T]IN that is stamped on the
sidewall.
(D) Tireco referenced inconsequentiality petitions NHTSA has
previously granted in the past that have addressed what it believes are
similar issues.
Tireco is not aware of any crashes, injuries, customer complaints,
or field reports associated with the subject noncompliance.
Tireco has additionally informed NHTSA that the fabricating
manufacturer has corrected the molds at the manufacturing plant so that
no additional tires will be manufactured with the noncompliance.
In summation, Tireco believes that the described noncompliance of
the subject tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that
its petition, to exempt Tireco from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that Tireco no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve tire
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after Tireco
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8).
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-14256 Filed 6-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P