Applications for New Awards; Skills for Success Program, 32545-32551 [2015-14081]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Notices
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015–14070 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Skills for
Success Program
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Overview Information: Skills for
Success Program.
Notice inviting applications for new
awards for fiscal year (FY) 2015.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.215H.
DATES:
Applications Available: June 11, 2015.
Deadline for Notice of Intent To
Apply: June 29, 2015.
Date of Informational Meeting: June
24, 2015.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 29, 2015.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: September 28, 2015.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Skills for
Success Program supports Local
Educational Agencies 1 (LEAs) and their
partners in implementing, evaluating,
and refining tools and approaches for
developing the non-cognitive skills of
middle-grades students in order to
increase student success. Grants provide
funding for the implementation,
evaluation, and refinement of existing
tools and approaches (e.g., digital
games, growth mindset classroom
activities, experiential learning
opportunities) that integrate the
development of students’ non-cognitive
skills into classroom-level activities and
existing strategies designed to improve
schools. As grantees implement their
projects, we expect them to collect,
analyze, and use data to improve their
tools and strategies throughout the
project period. Ultimately, we expect
grantees to identify and validate
scalable tools and approaches that can
be used by educators of high-need
middle-grades students across the
country. In addition, we expect that
these grants will help build the capacity
of LEAs and their partners to conduct
research and apply that research to
1 Defined
terms are noted throughout this
document with initial capitals.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
school- and district-level practices. This
program also encourages sustainable
partnerships that can continue the use
of effective tools and approaches
beyond the grant period.
Background: An emerging body of
research indicates that interventions
that focus on enhancing student
attributes, such as growth mindsets,
resilience, self-control, and other social
and behavioral skills, such as selfefficacy, can have a significant and
lasting impact on student achievement
and behavior. This research suggests
that non-cognitive factors may play an
important role in students’ academic,
career, and life outcomes.2 For example,
teaching students that their minds can
grow and develop through routine and
focused practice, as compared to
referring to intelligence as a fixed trait
like eye color, can increase students’
academic success.3 This competition is
designed to build on that research by
expanding our knowledge and
understanding about the tools and
approaches for promoting non-cognitive
skills or how educators can improve
their students’ non-cognitive skills as
part of their broader efforts to enhance
student educational outcomes,
including efforts to improve academic
achievement and attendance and reduce
chronic absenteeism and exclusionary
discipline.
For the FY 2015 competition, this
program focuses on projects that
implement, evaluate, and refine existing
tools and approaches that are designed
to improve students’ non-cognitive
skills during the middle grades. We
consider the middle grades (grades 5–8)
to be a particularly critical time in
students’ academic trajectories,
especially in the context of increased
expectations for what students should
know and be able to do in order to be
adequately prepared for college and
career opportunities. Moreover, recent
research demonstrates that educators of
students in middle grades may be able
to encourage non-cognitive skills
development to improve student
academic and behavioral outcomes.4
2 The University of Chicago Consortium of
Chicago School Research (June 2012). Teaching
Adolescents to Become Learners: The Role of Noncognitive Factors in Shaping School Performance.
Available at: https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/sites/
default/files/publications/Noncognitive%20
Report.pdf.
3 Blackwell, L.A., Trzesniewski, K.H., & Dweck,
C.S. (2007). Implicit Theories of intelligence and
achievement across the junior high school
transition: A longitudinal study and an
intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
Available at: mtoliveboe.org/cmsAdmin/uploads/
blackwell-theories-of-intelligence-child-dev2007.pdf.
4 Yeager, David S., and Gregory M. Walton (April
2011). Social-Psychological Interventions in
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32545
This competition supports projects
that improve upon existing tools and
approaches for enhancing students’ noncognitive skills by implementing these
tools and approaches and collecting and
using data, as well as leveraging other
analytical methods, throughout the
project. Through these grants, and LEAs’
partnerships with nonprofit
organizations, Institutions of Higher
Education (IHEs), other LEAs, or some
combination thereof, we expect to build
LEAs’ long-term capacity to implement,
evaluate, and improve strategies that
enhance students’ non-cognitive skills.
These partnerships could support
capacity building by bringing additional
resources and expertise to the
implementation and evaluation of these
tools and approaches. Strong
partnerships could also help LEAs
continue their work to develop students’
non-cognitive skills beyond the grant
period. By identifying and strengthening
tools and approaches that enhance
students’ non-cognitive skills, LEAs are
also expected to expand the impact of
their projects by sharing their emerging
practices with other LEAs or schools.
Partnerships with nonprofit
organizations and IHEs may also aid
these dissemination efforts.
We include two absolute priorities in
the FY 2015 competition. Applicants
must address both absolute priorities.
The first absolute priority requires
applicants to design projects that build
upon existing tools and approaches that
encourage middle-grades students to
develop their non-cognitive skills.
These projects are expected to improve
student outcomes and behaviors;
enhance the tools and approaches being
utilized to enrich students’ noncognitive skills and behaviors through
iterative analyses and improvements;
and build knowledge from which other
LEAs and schools can benefit. As efforts
and investments in the non-cognitive
area grow, we think it is important to
identify potentially scalable strategies
and models for students in the middle
grades, and to build the evidence base
supporting these approaches in order to
determine how educators can effectively
help students develop such skills and
behaviors. These approaches might
include, for example, implementing
educator-led interventions for both
individual students and groups of
students (that are carried out directly
with students), fostering changes in
educators’ instructional practices, or
redesigning learning environments.
Additionally, we ask applicants to
Education: They’re Not Magic. Available at:
https://web.stanford.edu/∼gwalton/home/Research_
files/YeagerWalton2011.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
32546
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Notices
ensure that their proposed approach fits
into existing school- or district-level
strategies to improve students’ learning
outcomes.
We also include a priority that
requires applicants to design projects
that improve academic outcomes or
learning environments for High-need
Students. Persistent and significant gaps
exist between High-need Students and
their more advantaged peers, and this
competition seeks to expand approaches
that help ensure that all students
succeed academically and learn
essential life skills that support their
success in college and their career.
Priorities: This competition includes
two absolute priorities. We are
establishing Absolute Priority 1 for the
FY 2015 Skills for Success competition
and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, in
accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the
General Education Provisions Act
(GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). Absolute
Priority 2 is from the Department’s
notice of final supplemental priorities
and definitions (Supplemental
Priorities), published in the Federal
Register on December 10, 2014 (79 FR
73425).
Absolute Priorities: These priorities
are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3) we consider only
applications that meet these priorities.
These priorities are:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Absolute Priority 1—Developing NonCognitive Skills in Middle-Grades
Students
Under this priority we provide
funding to projects that implement,
refine, and evaluate existing tools and
approaches that encourage the
development of non-cognitive skills for
students in grades 5–8. Such tools and
approaches may be designed to
encourage the development of growth
mindsets, resilience, and self-control,
among other attributes. Applicants must
demonstrate how their proposed
approach would develop students’ noncognitive skills and fit into existing
school- or district-level improvement
strategies. Projects will share their
learnings with other LEAs.
Absolute Priority 2—Supporting HighNeed Students
Under this priority we provide
funding to projects that are designed to
improve academic outcomes, learning
environments, or both, for High-need
Students.
Definitions: The following definitions
are from 34 CFR 77.1, the Supplemental
Priorities, and section 9101 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA) (20
U.S.C. 7801), and apply to the priorities
and selection criteria in this notice. The
source of each definition is noted in
parentheses following the text of the
definition.
High-minority school means a school
as that term is defined by an LEA,
which must define the term in a manner
consistent with its State’s Teacher
Equity Plan, as required by section
1111(b)(8)(C) of the ESEA. The
applicant must provide the definition(s)
of High-minority Schools used in its
application. (Supplemental Priorities)
High-need students means students
who are at risk of educational failure or
otherwise in need of special assistance
and support, such as students who are
living in poverty, who attend Highminority Schools, who are far below
grade level, who have left school before
receiving a Regular High School
Diploma, who are at risk of not
graduating with a diploma on time, who
are homeless, who are in foster care,
who have been incarcerated, who have
disabilities, or who are English learners.
(Supplemental Priorities)
Local educational agency means (a) In
general—a public board of education or
other public authority legally
constituted within a State for either
administrative control or direction of, or
to perform a service function for, public
elementary schools or secondary
schools in a city, county, township,
school district, or other political
subdivision of a State, or of or for a
combination of school districts or
counties that is recognized in a State as
an administrative agency for its public
elementary schools or secondary
schools.
(b) Administrative control and
direction—The term includes any other
public institution or agency having
administrative control and direction of
a public elementary school or secondary
school.
(c) BIA schools—The term includes
an elementary school or secondary
school funded by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs but only to the extent that
including the school makes the school
eligible for programs for which specific
eligibility is not provided to the school
in another provision of law and the
school does not have a student
population that is smaller than the
student population of the local
educational agency receiving assistance
under this Act with the smallest student
population, except that the school shall
not be subject to the jurisdiction of any
State educational agency other than the
Bureau of Indian Affairs.
(d) Educational service agencies—The
term includes educational service
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
agencies and consortia of those
agencies.
(e) State educational agency—The
term includes the State educational
agency in a State in which the State
educational agency is the sole
educational agency for all public
schools. (ESEA)
Logic model (also referred to as theory
of action) means a well-specified
conceptual framework that identifies
key components of the proposed
process, product, strategy, or practice
(i.e., the active ‘‘ingredients’’ that are
hypothesized to be critical to achieving
the relevant outcomes) and describes
the relationships among the key
components and outcomes, theoretically
and operationally. (34 CFR 77.1)
Nonprofit, as applied to an agency,
organization, or institution, means that
it is owned and operated by one or more
corporations or associations whose net
earnings do not benefit, and cannot
lawfully benefit, any private
shareholder or entity. (34 CFR 77.1)
Quasi-experimental design study
means a study using a design that
attempts to approximate an
experimental design by identifying a
comparison group that is similar to the
treatment group in important respects.
These studies, depending on design and
implementation, can meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with
reservations (but not What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without reservations). (34 CFR 77.1)
Randomized controlled trial means a
study that employs random assignment
of, for example, students, teachers,
classrooms, schools, or districts to
receive the intervention being evaluated
(the treatment group) or not to receive
the intervention (the control group). The
estimated effectiveness of the
intervention is the difference between
the average outcomes for the treatment
group and for the control group. These
studies, depending on design and
implementation, can meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without reservations. (34 CFR 77.1)
Regular high school diploma means
the standard high school diploma that is
awarded to students in the State and
that is fully aligned with the State’s
academic content standards or a higher
diploma and does not include a General
Education Development credential,
certificate of attendance, or any
alternative award. (Supplemental
Priorities)
Relevant outcome means the student
outcome(s) (or the ultimate outcome if
not related to students) the proposed
process, product, strategy, or practice is
designed to improve; consistent with
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Notices
the specific goals of a program. (34 CFR
77.1)
Strong theory means a rationale for
the proposed process, product, strategy,
or practice that includes a Logic Model.
(34 CFR 77.1)
What Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards means the standards set forth
in the What Works Clearinghouse
Procedures and Standards Handbook
(Version 3.0, March 2014), which can be
found at the following link: https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19. (34 CFR
77.1)
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally
offers interested parties the opportunity
to comment on proposed priorities and
requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of
GEPA, however, allows the Secretary to
exempt from rulemaking requirements,
regulations governing the first grant
competition under a new or
substantially revised program authority.
This is the first grant competition for
this program under 20 U.S.C. 7243–
7243c and therefore qualifies for this
exemption. In order to ensure timely
grant awards, the Secretary has decided
to forego public comment on Absolute
Priority 1 and the Eligible Applicants
requirement under section 437(d)(1) of
GEPA. This priority and this
requirement will apply to the FY 2015
grant competition and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the
list of unfunded applications for this
competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7243–7243c.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 75, 76, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84,
86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of
Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c)
The Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and
amended in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The
Supplemental Priorities (79 FR 73425).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to IHEs only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$2,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
we may make additional awards in FY
2016 or later years from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$400,000–600,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$500,000 per year.
Funding for the second and third
years is subject to the availability of
funds and the approval of continuation
awards (see 34 CFR 75.253).
Estimated Number of Awards: 4–5.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: 12–36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: The following
entities are eligible to apply for Skills
for Success grants:
(a) An LEA.
(b) An LEA in partnership with—
(1) A nonprofit;
(2) An IHE; or
(3) Other LEAs.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: You can obtain an application
package via the Internet or from the
Education Publications Center (ED
Pubs). To obtain a copy via the Internet,
use the following address:
www2.ed.gov/programs/skillssuccess/
index.html. To obtain a copy from ED
Pubs, write, fax, or call the following:
ED Pubs, U.S. Department of Education,
P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA 22304.
Telephone, toll free: 1–877–433–7827.
FAX: (703) 605–6794.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call, toll free: 1–877–
576–7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web
site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at its
email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package
from ED Pubs, be sure to identify this
program or competition as follows:
CFDA number 84.215H.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or compact disc)
by contacting the person listed under
Accessible Format in section VIII of this
notice.
2. a. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
competition.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32547
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
June 29, 2015.
We will be able to develop a more
efficient process for reviewing grant
applications if we know the
approximate number of applicants that
intend to apply for funding under this
competition. Therefore, the Secretary
strongly encourages each potential
applicant to notify us of the applicant’s
intent to submit an application by
completing a Web-based form.
Applicants may access this form online
at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/
VB5L3BR. Applicants that do not
complete this form may still submit an
application. Page Limit: The application
narrative (Part III of the application) is
where you, the applicant, address the
selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. Applicants
submitting an application should limit
the application narrative to no more
than 25 pages. Applicants also are
strongly encouraged not to include
lengthy appendices for the application
that contain information that they were
unable to include in the narrative.
Applicants should use the following
standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial.
The page limit for the application
does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet;
Part II, the budget section, including the
narrative budget justification; Part IV,
the assurances and certifications; or the
one-page abstract, the resumes, the
bibliography, or the letters of support
for the application.
b. Submission of Proprietary
Information:
Given the types of projects that may
be proposed in applications for the
Skills for Success Program, some
applications may include business
information that applicants consider
proprietary. The Department’s
regulations define ‘‘business
information’’ in 34 CFR 5.11.
We plan on posting the application
narrative section of funded Skills for
Success applications on the
Department’s Web site, so you may wish
to request confidentiality of business
information. Identifying proprietary
information in the submitted
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
32548
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Notices
application will help facilitate this
public disclosure process.
Consistent with Executive Order
12600, please designate in your
application any information that you
feel is exempt from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act. In the appropriate
Appendix section of your application,
under ‘‘Other Attachments Form,’’
please list the page number or numbers
on which we can find this information.
For additional information please see 34
CFR 5.11(c).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: June 11, 2015.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
June 29, 2015.
Date of Informational Meeting: We
intend to hold a Webinar to provide
technical assistance to interested
applicants on June 24, 2015. You may
obtain detailed information regarding
this meeting on the Skills for Success
Web site at www2.ed.gov/programs/
skillssuccess/.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 29, 2015.
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
(including dates and times) about how
to submit your application
electronically, or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, please refer to
section IV. 7. Other Submission
Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice. If
the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability in
connection with the application
process, the individual’s application
remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: September 28, 2015.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System
Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award
Management: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must—
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number
and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM) (formerly the
Central Contractor Registry (CCR)), the
Government’s primary registrant
database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and
TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM
registration with current information
while your application is under review
by the Department and, if you are
awarded a grant, during the project
period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from
Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one to two
business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency,
institution, or organization, you can
obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue
Service. If you are an individual, you
can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security
Administration. If you need a new TIN,
please allow two to five weeks for your
TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take
approximately seven business days, but
may take upwards of several weeks,
depending on the completeness and
accuracy of the data entered into the
SAM database by an entity. Thus, if you
think you might want to apply for
Federal financial assistance under a
program administered by the
Department, please allow sufficient time
to obtain and register your DUNS
number and TIN. We strongly
recommend that you register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active,
you will need to allow 24 to 48 hours for the
information to be available in Grants.gov and
before you can submit an application through
Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with
SAM, you may not need to make any
changes. However, please make certain
that the TIN associated with your DUNS
number is correct. Also note that you
will need to update your registration
annually. This may take three or more
business days.
Information about SAM is available at
www.SAM.gov. To further assist you
with obtaining and registering your
DUNS number and TIN in SAM or
updating your existing SAM account,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
we have prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet,
which you can find at: www2.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your
application via Grants.gov, you must (1)
be designated by your organization as an
Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these
steps are outlined at the following
Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/
web/grants/register.html.
7. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants for the Skills for
Success Program must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
Applications for Skills for Success
grants, CFDA number 84.215H, must be
submitted electronically using the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site
at www.Grants.gov. Through this site,
you will be able to download a copy of
the application package, complete it
offline, and then upload and submit
your application. You may not email an
electronic copy of a grant application to
us.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant
application for the Skills for Success
Program at www.Grants.gov. You must
search for the downloadable application
package for this competition by the
CFDA number. Do not include the
CFDA number’s alpha suffix in your
search (e.g., search for 84.215, not
84.215H).
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov
are date and time stamped. Your
application must be fully uploaded and
submitted and must be date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system no
later than 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date.
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Notices
Except as otherwise noted in this
section, we will not accept your
application if it is received—that is, date
and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system—after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date. We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will
notify you if we are rejecting your
application because it was date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this competition
to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the
Grants.gov system. You can also find the
Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News
and Events on the Department’s G5
system home page at www.G5.gov.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
you typically provide on the following
forms: The Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for
SF 424, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
• You must upload any narrative
sections and all other attachments to
your application as files in a PDF
(Portable Document) read-only, nonmodifiable format. Do not upload an
interactive or fillable PDF file. If you
upload a file type other than a readonly, non-modifiable PDF or submit a
password-protected file, we will not
review that material.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page-limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive from
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. (This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your
application from Grants.gov and send a
second notification to you by email.
This second notification indicates that
the Department has received your
application and has assigned your
application a PR/Award number (an EDspecified identifying number unique to
your application).
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting your
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
section VII of this notice and provide an
explanation of the technical problem
you experienced with Grants.gov, along
with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that that problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a
determination is made on whether your
application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in
this section apply only to the unavailability
of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32549
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
the Grants.gov system because––
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to the
Grants.gov system; and
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevents you from using the
Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to
the Department, it must be postmarked
no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Kelly Terpak, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Room 4C107, Washington,
DC 20202–5930. FAX: (202) 205–5631.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier) your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application
Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.215H), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400
Maryland Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20202–4260
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
32550
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Notices
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application
Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.215H), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7039,
Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC
20202–4260
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays,
and Federal holidays.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call
the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from 34
CFR 75.210, and are listed below. The
points assigned to each criterion are
indicated in the parentheses next to the
criterion. An applicant may earn up to
a total of 100 points based on the
selection criteria for the application.
A. Significance. (up to 20 points)
The Secretary considers the
significance of the proposed project. In
determining the significance of the
proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The likely utility of the products
(such as information, materials,
processes, or techniques) that will result
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
from the proposed project, including the
potential for their being used effectively
in a variety of other settings.
2. The extent to which the proposed
project involves the development or
demonstration of promising new
strategies that build on, or are
alternatives to, existing strategies.
3. The potential contribution of the
proposed project to the development
and advancement of theory, knowledge,
and practices in the field of study.
B. Quality of the project design. (up to
45 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of
the design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the proposed
project is supported by Strong Theory.
2. The extent to which the proposed
project represents an exceptional
approach to the priority or priorities
established for the competition.
3. The extent to which the proposed
activities constitute a coherent,
sustained program of research and
development in the field, including, as
appropriate, a substantial addition to an
ongoing line of inquiry.
4. The extent to which performance
feedback and continuous improvement
are integral to the design of the
proposed project.
C. Quality of the management plan.
(up to 15 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of
the management plan for the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the
management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
1. The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
proposed project.
2. The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks.
3. The relevance and demonstrated
commitment of each partner in the
proposed project to the implementation
and success of the project.
D. Quality of the project evaluation.
(up to 20 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of
the evaluation to be conducted of the
proposed project. In determining the
quality of the evaluation, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the methods of
evaluation provide for examining the
effectiveness of project implementation
strategies.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. The extent to which the evaluation
will provide guidance about effective
strategies suitable for replication or
testing in other settings.
3. The extent to which the methods of
evaluation will provide performance
feedback and permit periodic
assessment of progress toward achieving
intended outcomes.
4. The extent to which the methods of
evaluation will, if well-implemented,
produce evidence about the project’s
effectiveness that would meet the What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards with reservations.
Note: Applicants may wish to review the
following technical assistance resources on
evaluation:
(1) WWC Procedures and Standards
Handbook: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
references/idocviewer/
doc.aspx?docid=19&tocid=1; and (2)
IES/NCEE Technical Methods papers:
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/tech_methods. In
addition, we invite applicants to view
two Webinar recordings that were
hosted by the Institute of Education
Sciences (IES). The first Webinar
addresses strategies for designing and
executing well-designed Quasiexperimental Design Studies. This
Webinar is available at: https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/news.aspx?sid=23.
The second Webinar focuses on more
rigorous evaluation designs, including
strategies for designing and executing
Randomized Controlled Trials. This
Webinar is available at: https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/news.aspx?sid=18.
2. Review and Selection Process: Peer
reviewers will review all applications
eligible for Skills for Success grants that
are submitted by the established
deadline.
We remind potential applicants that
in reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary also requires
various assurances including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department of
Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4,
108.8, and 110.23).
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Notices
3. Special Conditions: Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose
special conditions and, in appropriate
circumstances, high-risk conditions on a
grant if the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2
CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multi-year award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: We have
established two performance measures
for the Skills for Success grants.
(1) The percentage of grantees that
demonstrate improvement in
participating students’ academic and
behavioral outcomes.
(2) The percentage of grantees that
demonstrate that at least one tool or
approach for enhancing participating
students’ non-cognitive skills is
effective; refined, if necessary; and
validated.
5. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
Whether the grantee has expended
funds in a manner that is consistent
with its approved application and
budget; and, if the Secretary has
established performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets in
the grantee’s approved application. In
making a continuation grant, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Terpak, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 4C107, Washington, DC 20202–
5930. Telephone: (202) 205–5231. FAX:
(202) 205–5631.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the
Federal Relay Service, toll free, at 1–
800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32551
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Nadya Chinoy Dabby,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2015–14081 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Federal Need Analysis Methodology
for the 2016–17 Award Year—Federal
Pell Grant, Federal Perkins Loan,
Federal Work-Study, Federal
Supplemental Educational Opportunity
Grant, William D. Ford Federal Direct
Loan, Iraq and Afghanistan Service
Grant and TEACH Grant Programs
Correction
In notice document 2015–12803
beginning on page 30217 in the issue of
Wednesday, May 27, 2015, make the
following correction:
On page 30220, the table titled
‘‘INDEPENDENT STUDENTS WITH
DEPENDENTS OTHER THAN A
SPOUSE’’ is corrected in part to read as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32545-32551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14081]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Skills for Success Program
AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Overview Information: Skills for Success Program.
Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY)
2015.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.215H.
DATES:
Applications Available: June 11, 2015.
Deadline for Notice of Intent To Apply: June 29, 2015.
Date of Informational Meeting: June 24, 2015.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 29, 2015.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 28, 2015.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Skills for Success Program supports Local
Educational Agencies \1\ (LEAs) and their partners in implementing,
evaluating, and refining tools and approaches for developing the non-
cognitive skills of middle-grades students in order to increase student
success. Grants provide funding for the implementation, evaluation, and
refinement of existing tools and approaches (e.g., digital games,
growth mindset classroom activities, experiential learning
opportunities) that integrate the development of students' non-
cognitive skills into classroom-level activities and existing
strategies designed to improve schools. As grantees implement their
projects, we expect them to collect, analyze, and use data to improve
their tools and strategies throughout the project period. Ultimately,
we expect grantees to identify and validate scalable tools and
approaches that can be used by educators of high-need middle-grades
students across the country. In addition, we expect that these grants
will help build the capacity of LEAs and their partners to conduct
research and apply that research to school- and district-level
practices. This program also encourages sustainable partnerships that
can continue the use of effective tools and approaches beyond the grant
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Defined terms are noted throughout this document with
initial capitals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background: An emerging body of research indicates that
interventions that focus on enhancing student attributes, such as
growth mindsets, resilience, self-control, and other social and
behavioral skills, such as self-efficacy, can have a significant and
lasting impact on student achievement and behavior. This research
suggests that non-cognitive factors may play an important role in
students' academic, career, and life outcomes.\2\ For example, teaching
students that their minds can grow and develop through routine and
focused practice, as compared to referring to intelligence as a fixed
trait like eye color, can increase students' academic success.\3\ This
competition is designed to build on that research by expanding our
knowledge and understanding about the tools and approaches for
promoting non-cognitive skills or how educators can improve their
students' non-cognitive skills as part of their broader efforts to
enhance student educational outcomes, including efforts to improve
academic achievement and attendance and reduce chronic absenteeism and
exclusionary discipline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The University of Chicago Consortium of Chicago School
Research (June 2012). Teaching Adolescents to Become Learners: The
Role of Non-cognitive Factors in Shaping School Performance.
Available at: https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Noncognitive%20Report.pdf.
\3\ Blackwell, L.A., Trzesniewski, K.H., & Dweck, C.S. (2007).
Implicit Theories of intelligence and achievement across the junior
high school transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention.
Child Development, 78, 246-263. Available at: mtoliveboe.org/cmsAdmin/uploads/blackwell-theories-of-intelligence-child-dev-2007.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the FY 2015 competition, this program focuses on projects that
implement, evaluate, and refine existing tools and approaches that are
designed to improve students' non-cognitive skills during the middle
grades. We consider the middle grades (grades 5-8) to be a particularly
critical time in students' academic trajectories, especially in the
context of increased expectations for what students should know and be
able to do in order to be adequately prepared for college and career
opportunities. Moreover, recent research demonstrates that educators of
students in middle grades may be able to encourage non-cognitive skills
development to improve student academic and behavioral outcomes.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Yeager, David S., and Gregory M. Walton (April 2011).
Social-Psychological Interventions in Education: They're Not Magic.
Available at: https://web.stanford.edu/~gwalton/home/Research_files/
YeagerWalton2011.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This competition supports projects that improve upon existing tools
and approaches for enhancing students' non-cognitive skills by
implementing these tools and approaches and collecting and using data,
as well as leveraging other analytical methods, throughout the project.
Through these grants, and LEAs' partnerships with nonprofit
organizations, Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs), other LEAs, or
some combination thereof, we expect to build LEAs' long-term capacity
to implement, evaluate, and improve strategies that enhance students'
non-cognitive skills. These partnerships could support capacity
building by bringing additional resources and expertise to the
implementation and evaluation of these tools and approaches. Strong
partnerships could also help LEAs continue their work to develop
students' non-cognitive skills beyond the grant period. By identifying
and strengthening tools and approaches that enhance students' non-
cognitive skills, LEAs are also expected to expand the impact of their
projects by sharing their emerging practices with other LEAs or
schools. Partnerships with nonprofit organizations and IHEs may also
aid these dissemination efforts.
We include two absolute priorities in the FY 2015 competition.
Applicants must address both absolute priorities.
The first absolute priority requires applicants to design projects
that build upon existing tools and approaches that encourage middle-
grades students to develop their non-cognitive skills. These projects
are expected to improve student outcomes and behaviors; enhance the
tools and approaches being utilized to enrich students' non-cognitive
skills and behaviors through iterative analyses and improvements; and
build knowledge from which other LEAs and schools can benefit. As
efforts and investments in the non-cognitive area grow, we think it is
important to identify potentially scalable strategies and models for
students in the middle grades, and to build the evidence base
supporting these approaches in order to determine how educators can
effectively help students develop such skills and behaviors. These
approaches might include, for example, implementing educator-led
interventions for both individual students and groups of students (that
are carried out directly with students), fostering changes in
educators' instructional practices, or redesigning learning
environments. Additionally, we ask applicants to
[[Page 32546]]
ensure that their proposed approach fits into existing school- or
district-level strategies to improve students' learning outcomes.
We also include a priority that requires applicants to design
projects that improve academic outcomes or learning environments for
High-need Students. Persistent and significant gaps exist between High-
need Students and their more advantaged peers, and this competition
seeks to expand approaches that help ensure that all students succeed
academically and learn essential life skills that support their success
in college and their career.
Priorities: This competition includes two absolute priorities. We
are establishing Absolute Priority 1 for the FY 2015 Skills for Success
competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the
list of unfunded applicants from this competition, in accordance with
section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), 20
U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). Absolute Priority 2 is from the Department's notice
of final supplemental priorities and definitions (Supplemental
Priorities), published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2014 (79
FR 73425).
Absolute Priorities: These priorities are absolute priorities.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that meet these
priorities.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1--Developing Non-Cognitive Skills in Middle-Grades
Students
Under this priority we provide funding to projects that implement,
refine, and evaluate existing tools and approaches that encourage the
development of non-cognitive skills for students in grades 5-8. Such
tools and approaches may be designed to encourage the development of
growth mindsets, resilience, and self-control, among other attributes.
Applicants must demonstrate how their proposed approach would develop
students' non-cognitive skills and fit into existing school- or
district-level improvement strategies. Projects will share their
learnings with other LEAs.
Absolute Priority 2--Supporting High-Need Students
Under this priority we provide funding to projects that are
designed to improve academic outcomes, learning environments, or both,
for High-need Students.
Definitions: The following definitions are from 34 CFR 77.1, the
Supplemental Priorities, and section 9101 of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 7801),
and apply to the priorities and selection criteria in this notice. The
source of each definition is noted in parentheses following the text of
the definition.
High-minority school means a school as that term is defined by an
LEA, which must define the term in a manner consistent with its State's
Teacher Equity Plan, as required by section 1111(b)(8)(C) of the ESEA.
The applicant must provide the definition(s) of High-minority Schools
used in its application. (Supplemental Priorities)
High-need students means students who are at risk of educational
failure or otherwise in need of special assistance and support, such as
students who are living in poverty, who attend High-minority Schools,
who are far below grade level, who have left school before receiving a
Regular High School Diploma, who are at risk of not graduating with a
diploma on time, who are homeless, who are in foster care, who have
been incarcerated, who have disabilities, or who are English learners.
(Supplemental Priorities)
Local educational agency means (a) In general--a public board of
education or other public authority legally constituted within a State
for either administrative control or direction of, or to perform a
service function for, public elementary schools or secondary schools in
a city, county, township, school district, or other political
subdivision of a State, or of or for a combination of school districts
or counties that is recognized in a State as an administrative agency
for its public elementary schools or secondary schools.
(b) Administrative control and direction--The term includes any
other public institution or agency having administrative control and
direction of a public elementary school or secondary school.
(c) BIA schools--The term includes an elementary school or
secondary school funded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs but only to the
extent that including the school makes the school eligible for programs
for which specific eligibility is not provided to the school in another
provision of law and the school does not have a student population that
is smaller than the student population of the local educational agency
receiving assistance under this Act with the smallest student
population, except that the school shall not be subject to the
jurisdiction of any State educational agency other than the Bureau of
Indian Affairs.
(d) Educational service agencies--The term includes educational
service agencies and consortia of those agencies.
(e) State educational agency--The term includes the State
educational agency in a State in which the State educational agency is
the sole educational agency for all public schools. (ESEA)
Logic model (also referred to as theory of action) means a well-
specified conceptual framework that identifies key components of the
proposed process, product, strategy, or practice (i.e., the active
``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be critical to achieving the
relevant outcomes) and describes the relationships among the key
components and outcomes, theoretically and operationally. (34 CFR 77.1)
Nonprofit, as applied to an agency, organization, or institution,
means that it is owned and operated by one or more corporations or
associations whose net earnings do not benefit, and cannot lawfully
benefit, any private shareholder or entity. (34 CFR 77.1)
Quasi-experimental design study means a study using a design that
attempts to approximate an experimental design by identifying a
comparison group that is similar to the treatment group in important
respects. These studies, depending on design and implementation, can
meet What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with reservations (but
not What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without reservations).
(34 CFR 77.1)
Randomized controlled trial means a study that employs random
assignment of, for example, students, teachers, classrooms, schools, or
districts to receive the intervention being evaluated (the treatment
group) or not to receive the intervention (the control group). The
estimated effectiveness of the intervention is the difference between
the average outcomes for the treatment group and for the control group.
These studies, depending on design and implementation, can meet What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without reservations. (34 CFR
77.1)
Regular high school diploma means the standard high school diploma
that is awarded to students in the State and that is fully aligned with
the State's academic content standards or a higher diploma and does not
include a General Education Development credential, certificate of
attendance, or any alternative award. (Supplemental Priorities)
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) (or the ultimate
outcome if not related to students) the proposed process, product,
strategy, or practice is designed to improve; consistent with
[[Page 32547]]
the specific goals of a program. (34 CFR 77.1)
Strong theory means a rationale for the proposed process, product,
strategy, or practice that includes a Logic Model. (34 CFR 77.1)
What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards means the standards set
forth in the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook
(Version 3.0, March 2014), which can be found at the following link:
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19. (34 CFR 77.1)
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities and requirements.
Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the Secretary to exempt from
rulemaking requirements, regulations governing the first grant
competition under a new or substantially revised program authority.
This is the first grant competition for this program under 20 U.S.C.
7243-7243c and therefore qualifies for this exemption. In order to
ensure timely grant awards, the Secretary has decided to forego public
comment on Absolute Priority 1 and the Eligible Applicants requirement
under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. This priority and this requirement
will apply to the FY 2015 grant competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications for this
competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7243-7243c.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75, 76, 77, 79, 81,
82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget
Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements
for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The Supplemental Priorities (79 FR 73425).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $2,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2016 or later years
from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $400,000-600,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $500,000 per year.
Funding for the second and third years is subject to the
availability of funds and the approval of continuation awards (see 34
CFR 75.253).
Estimated Number of Awards: 4-5.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: 12-36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: The following entities are eligible to
apply for Skills for Success grants:
(a) An LEA.
(b) An LEA in partnership with--
(1) A nonprofit;
(2) An IHE; or
(3) Other LEAs.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: You can obtain an
application package via the Internet or from the Education Publications
Center (ED Pubs). To obtain a copy via the Internet, use the following
address: www2.ed.gov/programs/skillssuccess/. To obtain a
copy from ED Pubs, write, fax, or call the following: ED Pubs, U.S.
Department of Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA 22304.
Telephone, toll free: 1-877-433-7827. FAX: (703) 605-6794.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call, toll free: 1-877-576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at
its email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package from ED Pubs, be sure to
identify this program or competition as follows: CFDA number 84.215H.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or compact disc) by contacting the person listed under Accessible
Format in section VIII of this notice.
2. a. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: June 29, 2015.
We will be able to develop a more efficient process for reviewing
grant applications if we know the approximate number of applicants that
intend to apply for funding under this competition. Therefore, the
Secretary strongly encourages each potential applicant to notify us of
the applicant's intent to submit an application by completing a Web-
based form. Applicants may access this form online at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/VB5L3BR. Applicants that do not complete this
form may still submit an application. Page Limit: The application
narrative (Part III of the application) is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. Applicants submitting an application should limit the
application narrative to no more than 25 pages. Applicants also are
strongly encouraged not to include lengthy appendices for the
application that contain information that they were unable to include
in the narrative. Applicants should use the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The page limit for the application does not apply to Part I, the
cover sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative
budget justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or
the one-page abstract, the resumes, the bibliography, or the letters of
support for the application.
b. Submission of Proprietary Information:
Given the types of projects that may be proposed in applications
for the Skills for Success Program, some applications may include
business information that applicants consider proprietary. The
Department's regulations define ``business information'' in 34 CFR
5.11.
We plan on posting the application narrative section of funded
Skills for Success applications on the Department's Web site, so you
may wish to request confidentiality of business information.
Identifying proprietary information in the submitted
[[Page 32548]]
application will help facilitate this public disclosure process.
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you feel is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act. In the appropriate
Appendix section of your application, under ``Other Attachments Form,''
please list the page number or numbers on which we can find this
information. For additional information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: June 11, 2015.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: June 29, 2015.
Date of Informational Meeting: We intend to hold a Webinar to
provide technical assistance to interested applicants on June 24, 2015.
You may obtain detailed information regarding this meeting on the
Skills for Success Web site at www2.ed.gov/programs/skillssuccess/.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 29, 2015.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV. 7. Other Submission
Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 28, 2015.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award Management: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM) (formerly the Central Contractor Registry (CCR)), the
Government's primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information
while your application is under review by the Department and, if you
are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one to two business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow two to five weeks for your TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take approximately seven business
days, but may take upwards of several weeks, depending on the
completeness and accuracy of the data entered into the SAM database by
an entity. Thus, if you think you might want to apply for Federal
financial assistance under a program administered by the Department,
please allow sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number
and TIN. We strongly recommend that you register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active, you will need to
allow 24 to 48 hours for the information to be available in
Grants.gov and before you can submit an application through
Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make
any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with
your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will need to update
your registration annually. This may take three or more business days.
Information about SAM is available at www.SAM.gov. To further
assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in
SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov
Tip Sheet, which you can find at: www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov,
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html.
7. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants for the
Skills for Success Program must be submitted electronically unless you
qualify for an exception to this requirement in accordance with the
instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for Skills for Success grants, CFDA number 84.215H,
must be submitted electronically using the Governmentwide Grants.gov
Apply site at www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be able to
download a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and
then upload and submit your application. You may not email an
electronic copy of a grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for the Skills for
Success Program at www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable
application package for this competition by the CFDA number. Do not
include the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for
84.215, not 84.215H).
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
[[Page 32549]]
Except as otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your
application if it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the
Grants.gov system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. We do not consider an application that does
not comply with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting
your application because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5
system home page at www.G5.gov.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms: The
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications.
You must upload any narrative sections and all other
attachments to your application as files in a PDF (Portable Document)
read-only, non-modifiable format. Do not upload an interactive or
fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than a read-only,
non-modifiable PDF or submit a password-protected file, we will not
review that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by email. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether
your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system; and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevents you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Kelly Terpak, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4C107,
Washington, DC 20202-5930. FAX: (202) 205-5631.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center,
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.215H), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not
[[Page 32550]]
accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center,
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.215H), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7039,
Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 75.210, and are listed below. The points assigned to
each criterion are indicated in the parentheses next to the criterion.
An applicant may earn up to a total of 100 points based on the
selection criteria for the application.
A. Significance. (up to 20 points)
The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed project.
In determining the significance of the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The likely utility of the products (such as information,
materials, processes, or techniques) that will result from the proposed
project, including the potential for their being used effectively in a
variety of other settings.
2. The extent to which the proposed project involves the
development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on,
or are alternatives to, existing strategies.
3. The potential contribution of the proposed project to the
development and advancement of theory, knowledge, and practices in the
field of study.
B. Quality of the project design. (up to 45 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the proposed project is supported by Strong
Theory.
2. The extent to which the proposed project represents an
exceptional approach to the priority or priorities established for the
competition.
3. The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a
coherent, sustained program of research and development in the field,
including, as appropriate, a substantial addition to an ongoing line of
inquiry.
4. The extent to which performance feedback and continuous
improvement are integral to the design of the proposed project.
C. Quality of the management plan. (up to 15 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the
proposed project. In determining the quality of the management plan for
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
1. The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the proposed project.
2. The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of
the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks.
3. The relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in the
proposed project to the implementation and success of the project.
D. Quality of the project evaluation. (up to 20 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project. In determining the quality of the
evaluation, the Secretary considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the methods of evaluation provide for
examining the effectiveness of project implementation strategies.
2. The extent to which the evaluation will provide guidance about
effective strategies suitable for replication or testing in other
settings.
3. The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes.
4. The extent to which the methods of evaluation will, if well-
implemented, produce evidence about the project's effectiveness that
would meet the What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with
reservations.
Note: Applicants may wish to review the following technical
assistance resources on evaluation:
(1) WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/references/idocviewer/doc.aspx?docid=19&tocid=1; and (2) IES/NCEE
Technical Methods papers: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/tech_methods. In
addition, we invite applicants to view two Webinar recordings that were
hosted by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). The first Webinar
addresses strategies for designing and executing well-designed Quasi-
experimental Design Studies. This Webinar is available at: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/news.aspx?sid=23. The second Webinar focuses on
more rigorous evaluation designs, including strategies for designing
and executing Randomized Controlled Trials. This Webinar is available
at: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/news.aspx?sid=18.
2. Review and Selection Process: Peer reviewers will review all
applications eligible for Skills for Success grants that are submitted
by the established deadline.
We remind potential applicants that in reviewing applications in
any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under
34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying
out a previous award, such as the applicant's use of funds, achievement
of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. The
Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a
timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
also requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
[[Page 32551]]
3. Special Conditions: Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may
impose special conditions and, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk
conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is not financially
stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or
other management system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part
200, subpart D; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or
is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: We have established two performance
measures for the Skills for Success grants.
(1) The percentage of grantees that demonstrate improvement in
participating students' academic and behavioral outcomes.
(2) The percentage of grantees that demonstrate that at least one
tool or approach for enhancing participating students' non-cognitive
skills is effective; refined, if necessary; and validated.
5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; Whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application. In making a
continuation grant, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is
operating in compliance with the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving
Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5,
106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Terpak, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4C107, Washington, DC 20202-
5930. Telephone: (202) 205-5231. FAX: (202) 205-5631.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the Federal Relay Service, toll
free, at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Nadya Chinoy Dabby,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2015-14081 Filed 6-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P