Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From the Netherlands: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 32340-32342 [2015-13952]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
32340
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Notices
meeting at https://facadatabase.gov/
committee/meetings.aspx?cid=242 and
clicking on the ‘‘Meeting Details’’ and
‘‘Documents’’ links. Records generated
from this meeting may also be inspected
and reproduced at the Southern
Regional Office, as they become
available, both before and after the
meeting. Persons interested in the work
of this Committee are directed to the
Commission’s Web site, https://
www.usccr.gov, or may contact the
Southern Regional Office at the above
email or street address.
Agenda
Call to Order
Dr. Elena Flom, Chair & Jeffrey Hinton,
Regional Director, SRO
Introduction of members to the
committee
Training requirements: Ethics training
and Financial Disclosure form
Status Report of subcommittee: Human
Trafficking (Introduction of subject
proposed to new members)
Committee consideration of proposals of
subcommittee.
New Business—Nomination of Vice
Chairman: Dr. Elena Flom, Chair
Open Comment
Adjourn
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 12:00 p.m.
EST.
PUBLIC CALL INFORMATION:
Dial: 888–539–3612
Conference ID: 8058593
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hinton, DFO, at 404–562–7006 or
jhinton@usccr.gov.
Dated: June 3, 2015.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2015–13938 Filed 6–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Notice of Public Meeting of the
Oklahoma Advisory Committee for a
Meeting To Discuss Potential Panelists
and Logistics for September Meeting
Regarding the School to Prison
Pipeline in Oklahoma
U.S. Commission on Civil
Rights.
ACTION: Announcement of meeting.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the U.S. Commission
on Civil Rights (Commission) and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act that
the Oklahoma Advisory Committee
(Committee) will hold a meeting on
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Jun 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
Friday, June 26, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. CST
for the purpose of discussing the
potential speakers and logistics for a
September meeting on the school to
prison pipeline. The Committee
approved a project proposal on the topic
at its March 27, 2015, meeting.
Members of the public can listen to
the discussion. This meeting is available
to the public through the following tollfree call-in number: 888–505–4368,
conference ID: 2862160. Any interested
member of the public may call this
number and listen to the meeting. An
open comment period will be provided
to allow members of the public to make
a statement at the end of the meeting.
The conference call operator will ask
callers to identify themselves, the
organization they are affiliated with (if
any), and an email address prior to
placing callers into the conference
room. Callers can expect to incur
charges for calls they initiate over
wireless lines, and the Commission will
not refund any incurred charges. Callers
will incur no charge for calls they
initiate over land-line connections to
the toll-free telephone number. Persons
with hearing impairments may also
follow the proceedings by first calling
the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–977–
8339 and providing the Service with the
conference call number and conference
ID number.
Member of the public are also entitled
to submit written comments; the
comments must be received in the
regional office by July 26, 2015. Written
comments may be mailed to the
Regional Programs Unit, U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights, 55 W.
Monroe St., Suite 410, Chicago, IL
60615. They may also be faxed to the
Commission at (312) 353–8324, or
emailed to Administrative Assistant,
Carolyn Allen at callen@usccr.gov.
Persons who desire additional
information may contact the Regional
Programs Unit at (312) 353–8311.
Records and documents discussed
during the meeting will be available for
public viewing prior to and after the
meeting at https://facadatabase.gov/
committee/meetings.aspx?cid=269 and
clicking on the ‘‘Meeting Details’’ and
‘‘Documents’’ links. Records generated
from this meeting may also be inspected
and reproduced at the Regional
Programs Unit, as they become
available, both before and after the
meeting. Persons interested in the work
of this Committee are directed to the
Commission’s Web site, https://
www.usccr.gov, or may contact the
Regional Programs Unit at the above
email or street address.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agenda
Welcome and Introductions
Vicki Limas, Chair
Discussion of Potential Agenda for
meeting on School to Prison
Pipeline in Oklahoma
Oklahoma Advisory Committee
Planning Next Steps
Open Comment
Adjournment
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Friday, June 26, 2015, at 1:30 p.m.
PUBLIC CALL INFORMATION:
Dial: 888–505–4368.
Conference ID: 2862160.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Mussatt, DFO, at 312–353–8311
or dmussatt@usccr.gov.
Dated: June 3, 2015.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2015–13895 Filed 6–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–421–811]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From
the Netherlands: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on purified
carboxymethylcellulose (purified CMC)
from the Netherlands. The period of
review (POR) is July 1, 2013, through
June 30, 2014. The review covers one
producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise, Akzo Nobel Functional
Chemicals, B.V. (Akzo Nobel).
We preliminarily determine that sales
of subject merchandise by Akzo Nobel
were not made at less than normal value
during the POR. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Angelica Townsend, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Notices
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is all purified CMC. The merchandise
subject to the order is currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States at
subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff
classification is provided for
convenience and Customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, titled
‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from the
Netherlands; 2013–2014’’ (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum), which is
issued concurrent with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Access to ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
A list of topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Methodology
The Department has conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Constructed export
price (CEP) is calculated in accordance
with section 772 of the Act. Normal
value is calculated in accordance with
section 773 of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that, for
the period July 1, 2013, through June 30,
2014, the following weighted-average
dumping margin exists:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Jun 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
32341
Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address, and telephone number;
Manufacturer/exporter
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals B.V.1 ................................
0.00 those raised in the respective case
briefs. Parties will be notified of the
time and location of the hearing.
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to publish
The Department intends to disclose to the final results of this administrative
interested parties to the proceeding any
review, including the results of its
calculations performed in connection
analysis of issues addressed in any case
with these preliminary results of review or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days
within five days after the date of
after publication of the preliminary
publication of this notice.2 Interested
results, unless extended.12
parties may submit case briefs to the
Assessment Rates
Department in response to these
preliminary results no later than 30 days
Upon completion of this
after the publication of these
administrative review, the Department
preliminary results.3 Rebuttal briefs, the shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
content of which is limited to the issues Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
raised in the case briefs, must be filed
antidumping duties on all appropriate
within five days from the deadline date
entries.13 If Akzo Nobel’s weightedfor the submission of case briefs.4
average dumping margin is not zero or
Parties who submit arguments in this
de minimis in the final results of this
proceeding are requested to submit with review, we will calculate importereach argument: (1) A statement of the
specific assessment rates on the basis of
issue; (2) a brief summary of the
the ratio of the total amount of
5
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
antidumping duties calculated for an
Executive summaries should be limited
importer’s examined sales and the total
to five pages total, including footnotes.
entered value of such sales in
Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
6 In order to be properly
using ACCESS.
If Akzo Nobel’s weighted-average
filed, ACCESS must successfully receive
dumping margin continues to be zero or
an electronically-filed document in its
de minimis in the final results of review,
entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time. Case
we will instruct CBP not to assess duties
and rebuttal briefs must be served on
on any of its entries in accordance with
7
interested parties.
the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,
Within 30 days of the date of
‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin
publication of this notice, interested
of dumping for the exporter is
parties may request a public hearing on
determined to be zero or de minimis, no
arguments raised in the case and
antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 14
rebuttal briefs.8 Unless the Department
The final results of this review shall be
specifies otherwise, the hearing, if
the basis for the assessment of
requested, will be held two days after
antidumping duties on entries of
the date for submission of rebuttal
merchandise covered by the final results
briefs.9 Written argument and hearing
of this review and for future deposits of
requests should be electronically
estimated duties, where applicable.
submitted to the Department via
We intend to issue liquidation
ACCESS.10 The Department’s electronic
instructions to CBP 15 days after
records system, ACCESS, must
publication of the final results of this
successfully receive an electronicallyreview.
filed document in its entirety by 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after
Cash Deposit Requirements
the date of publication of this notice.11
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
1 For this administrative review, the Department
publication of the final results of this
preliminarily determines that Akzo Nobel and
ANC–AG should be treated as a single entity, based
administrative review for all shipments
on affiliation and intertwined relations. See the
of the subject merchandise entered, or
Preliminary Analysis Memorandum at 2–7.
withdrawn from warehouse, for
2 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
3 See
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
6 See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
7 See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
9 See 19 CFR 351.310(d)(1).
10 See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
11 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
4 See
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR
351.213(h).
13 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
14 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
32342
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Notices
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Akzo Nobel will be
that established in the final results of
this administrative review (except, if the
rate is zero or de minimis, no cash
deposit will be required); (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or in the less-than-fair-value
investigation but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be the allothers rate of 14.57 percent, which is
the all-others rate established in the
investigation.15 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Affiliation and Treatment as a Single
Entity
4. Scope of the Order
5. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value
1. Determination of Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
15 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders:
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,
Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 70 FR 39734,
39735 (July 11, 2005).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Jun 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
B. Product Comparisons
C. Date of Sale
D. Constructed Export Price
E. Normal Value
1. Home Market Viability as Comparison
Market
2. Level of Trade
3. Cost of Production
a. Calculation of Cost of Production
b. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
c. Results of the Cost of Production Test
4. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
6. Currency Conversion
7. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–13952 Filed 6–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–853]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Canada: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on citric acid
and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from
Canada.1 The period of review (POR) is
May 1, 2013, through April 30, 2014.
The review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise,
Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL
Canada). We preliminarily determine
that sales of subject merchandise by JBL
Canada have not been made at prices
below normal value (NV). We invite
interested parties to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor or Katherine Johnson,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–4007 or (202) 482–4929,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is citric acid and certain citrate
salts from Canada. The product is
currently classified under subheadings
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR
36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000,
2918.15.5000, and 3824.90.9290 of the
Harmonized Tariff System of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of merchandise
subject to the scope is dispositive.2
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price is calculated in accordance
with section 772 of the Act. NV is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, the
Department preliminarily determines
that a weighted-average dumping
margin of 0.00 percent exists for JBL
Canada for the period May 1, 2013,
through April 30, 2014.
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose to interested
parties the calculations performed in
connection with these preliminary
results within five days of the date of
2 A full description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Citric
Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada’’
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with these results and hereby adopted
by this notice.
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32340-32342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13952]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-421-811]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From the Netherlands: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on purified
carboxymethylcellulose (purified CMC) from the Netherlands. The period
of review (POR) is July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. The review
covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, Akzo Nobel
Functional Chemicals, B.V. (Akzo Nobel).
We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise by
Akzo Nobel were not made at less than normal value during the POR.
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Angelica Townsend, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0195 or (202) 482-3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 32341]]
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is all purified CMC. The
merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading
3912.31.00. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and
Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, titled
``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from the
Netherlands; 2013-2014'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is
issued concurrent with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records
Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Methodology
The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price (CEP) is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the
Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the
Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that, for the period July 1, 2013,
through June 30, 2014, the following weighted-average dumping margin
exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals B.V.\1\..................... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to interested parties to the
proceeding any calculations performed in connection with these
preliminary results of review within five days after the date of
publication of this notice.\2\ Interested parties may submit case
briefs to the Department in response to these preliminary results no
later than 30 days after the publication of these preliminary
results.\3\ Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is limited to the
issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days from
the deadline date for the submission of case briefs.\4\ Parties who
submit arguments in this proceeding are requested to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\5\ Executive summaries should
be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. Case and rebuttal
briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\6\ In order to be properly filed,
ACCESS must successfully receive an electronically-filed document in
its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time. Case and rebuttal briefs must be
served on interested parties.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For this administrative review, the Department preliminarily
determines that Akzo Nobel and ANC-AG should be treated as a single
entity, based on affiliation and intertwined relations. See the
Preliminary Analysis Memorandum at 2-7.
\2\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\6\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice,
interested parties may request a public hearing on arguments raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs.\8\ Unless the Department specifies
otherwise, the hearing, if requested, will be held two days after the
date for submission of rebuttal briefs.\9\ Written argument and hearing
requests should be electronically submitted to the Department via
ACCESS.\10\ The Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, must
successfully receive an electronically-filed document in its entirety
by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication
of this notice.\11\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be
limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. Parties will be
notified of the time and location of the hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d)(1).
\10\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to publish the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues
addressed in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after
publication of the preliminary results, unless extended.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\13\ If Akzo Nobel's
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final
results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for an importer's examined sales and the total
entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If
Akzo Nobel's weighted-average dumping margin continues to be zero or de
minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to
assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final
Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average
margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de
minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \14\ The final
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties,
where applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\14\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14,
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for
[[Page 32342]]
consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Akzo Nobel will be that established
in the final results of this administrative review (except, if the rate
is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review, or in the less-than-fair-value
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of
14.57 percent, which is the all-others rate established in the
investigation.\15\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, Mexico, the Netherlands and
Sweden, 70 FR 39734, 39735 (July 11, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Affiliation and Treatment as a Single Entity
4. Scope of the Order
5. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value
1. Determination of Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
B. Product Comparisons
C. Date of Sale
D. Constructed Export Price
E. Normal Value
1. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
2. Level of Trade
3. Cost of Production
a. Calculation of Cost of Production
b. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
c. Results of the Cost of Production Test
4. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
6. Currency Conversion
7. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-13952 Filed 6-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
