Silicomanganese From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 31891-31892 [2015-13683]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Notices
Docket Number: 15–006. Applicant:
Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois
St., Golden, CO 80401. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Czech Republic. Intended
Use: The instrument will be used to
elucidate structure-property
relationships in a wide variety of
materials including metals, ceramics,
and semiconductors. Justification for
Duty-Free Entry: There are no
instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: February 10,
2015.
Docket Number: 15–008. Applicant:
St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital,
262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN
38105. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech
Republic. Intended Use: The instrument
will be used to study the best course of
treatment and prevention of
reoccurrence of pediatric cancers, by
studying cell and tissue cultures as well
as human tumor tissue. Justification for
Duty-Free Entry: There are no
instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: February 20,
2015.
Docket Number: 15–009. Applicant:
University of Texas Health Science
Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San
Antonio, TX 78229. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer:
JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The
instrument will be used to document
the light and ultrastructural change that
occurs in the liver and adipose tissues
from various sites under conditions of
stress using mice with a targeted
deletion of Tmem127. Electron
microscopy will be used to document
the size and effect of different
conditions on lysosomal structure and
distribution. Justification for Duty-Free
Entry: There are no instruments of the
same general category manufactured in
the United States. Application accepted
by Commissioner of Customs: May 8,
2015.
Docket Number: 15–013. Applicant:
Washington State University, 220
French Administration Building, PO
Box 641020, Pullman, WA 99164–1020.
Instrument: CTK Reactor, High Pressure
Reactor, Diff pump mass spectrometer.
Manufacturer: OmniVac, Germany.
Intended Use: The instrument will be
used to take measurements during an
ongoing catalytic reaction, i.e. under
‘operando’ reaction conditions so as to
clarify mechanistic details during
studies up to 100 bar so as to ensure
optimal conditions for the production of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:33 Jun 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
fuels and other chemical feedstock such
as detergents or lubricants. Such
dynamic reaction studies will help
elucidate the mechanisms of catalytic
reactions such as the formation of
transportation fuels from ‘synthesis gas’
(Fischer Tropsch synthesis). While CTK
informs about the early run-in period in
a time-resolved manner, the high
pressure reactor allows the study of
steady-state reaction behavior at a bench
scale for many hours. The
Quantachrome system allows
measurements of the specific surfaces
areas of materials, which is required for
the optimization of catalysts. The CTK
reactor comprises a gas cleaning and
dosing system, along with gas inlets
using mass flow controllers. The central
part of the reactor is made of quartz, and
temperatures can be varied at choice.
The high pressure reactor comprises gas
cleaning and inlet pressure up to 100
bar, surrounded by a temperature
programmed oven which allows
temperatures of up to 500 Celsius. The
differential mass spectrometer serves to
continuously control gas phase
compositions and is equipped with a
high-speed turbo molecular pump and
rotary forevacuum pump. Sampling
occurs with calibrated capillary at
pressures controlled by ion gauges. The
Quantachrome system allows specific
surface areas to be determined using
non-selective probe molecule
adsorption at cryogenic temperatures.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: May 8, 2015.
Docket Number: 15–020. Applicant:
The City University of New York, 205
East 42nd Street, Room 11–64, New
York, NY 10017. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Japan. Intended Use: The
instrument will be used to understand
the structural mechanism by which
macromolecular complexes, organelles
and cells carry out their actions, using
single particle analysis and tomography,
involving taking many images of
biological materials in vitrified ice.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category manufactured in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: May 8, 2015.
Dated: May 28, 2015.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director of Subsidies Enforcement,
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–13678 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31891
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–823]
Silicomanganese From India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
silicomanganese from India. The period
of review (POR) is May 1, 2013, through
April 30, 2014. This review covers
respondent Nava Bharat Ventures
Limited (Nava). The Department
preliminarily determines that Nava did
not make sales of subject merchandise at
prices below normal value (NV) during
the POR. The preliminary results are
listed below in the section titled
‘‘Preliminary Results of Review.’’
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: June 4, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Lindgren at (202) 482–3870;
AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Scope of the Order
The products subject to the order are
all forms, sizes and compositions of
silicomanganese, except low-carbon
silicomanganese, including
silicomanganese briquettes, fines and
slag. The silicomanganese subject to the
order is currently classifiable under
subheading 7202.30.0000 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.1 The written description
is dispositive.
1 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Results of the 2013–2014
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Silicomanganese from India (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
31892
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Notices
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Access to ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Export price is
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine the following
weighted-average dumping margin for
the period May 1, 2013, through April
30, 2014.
Weightedaverage
margin
Manufacturer/Exporter
Nava Bharat Ventures Limited ...
0.00%
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department will disclose to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with these
preliminary results within five days of
the date of publication of this notice.2
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit cases
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.3
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.4 Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
2 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
3 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
4 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:33 Jun 03, 2015
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.5
Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed
using ACCESS.6 In order to be properly
filed, ACCESS must successfully receive
an electronically-filed document in its
entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via ACCESS, within 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice.7 Requests should contain: (1)
The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs.
The Department will issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs,
not later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, unless
that time is extended.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the
administrative review, the Department
shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review.
If Nava’s weighted-average dumping
margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e.,
less than 0.5 percent) in the final results
of this review, we will calculate an
importer-specific assessment rate on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the importer’s
examined sales and the total entered
value of the sales in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where the
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective for all shipments of
silicomanganese from India entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
5 See
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
6 See 19 CFR 351.303.
7 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for the company
under review will be the rate
established in the final results of this
review (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no
cash deposit will be required); (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less-than-fair-value
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous review,
the cash deposit rate will be the all
others rate from the investigation of this
order, 17.74 percent. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Product Comparisons
V. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis
C. Date of Sale
D. Export Price
E. Product Grades
F. Normal Value
G. Bona Fides of U.S. Sale
H. Currency Conversion
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–13683 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31891-31892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13683]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-823]
Silicomanganese From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
silicomanganese from India. The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2013,
through April 30, 2014. This review covers respondent Nava Bharat
Ventures Limited (Nava). The Department preliminarily determines that
Nava did not make sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal
value (NV) during the POR. The preliminary results are listed below in
the section titled ``Preliminary Results of Review.'' Interested
parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: June 4, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Lindgren at (202) 482-3870; AD/
CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The products subject to the order are all forms, sizes and
compositions of silicomanganese, except low-carbon silicomanganese,
including silicomanganese briquettes, fines and slag. The
silicomanganese subject to the order is currently classifiable under
subheading 7202.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and
customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is
contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice.\1\ The written description is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2013-2014
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Silicomanganese from India (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 31892]]
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records
Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price
is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the
following weighted-average dumping margin for the period May 1, 2013,
through April 30, 2014.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Manufacturer/Exporter average
margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nava Bharat Ventures Limited................................ 0.00%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department will disclose to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days
of the date of publication of this notice.\2\ Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs no later than 30
days after the date of publication of this notice.\3\ Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\4\ Parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged
to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\5\ Case and
rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\6\ In order to be
properly filed, ACCESS must successfully receive an electronically-
filed document in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.\7\ Requests should contain: (1) The
party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised
in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case
briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department will issue the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in
any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act, unless that time is extended.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of this review.
If Nava's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we
will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the
ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's
examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where the respondent's weighted-average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of silicomanganese from India entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company
under review will be the rate established in the final results of this
review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5
percent, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously reviewed
or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4)
if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this
or any previous review, the cash deposit rate will be the all others
rate from the investigation of this order, 17.74 percent. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Product Comparisons
V. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis
C. Date of Sale
D. Export Price
E. Product Grades
F. Normal Value
G. Bona Fides of U.S. Sale
H. Currency Conversion
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-13683 Filed 6-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
