Levi Strauss & Company Eugene, Oregon; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 30492-30493 [2015-12884]

Download as PDF 30492 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Notices Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of April 2015. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 85,832, BpRex Healthcare Brookville, Inc., Brookville, Pennsylvania. 85,835, S4 Carlisle Publishing Services, Dubuque, Iowa. 85,871, Multiband Corporation, Richmond, Kentucky. 85,878, MicroTelecom Systems LLC, Uniondale, New York. 85,882, The Nielsen Company (US), LLC, Shelton, Connecticut. Employment and Training Administration 18:18 May 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR [TA–W–85,726] After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 85,883, Schlumberger, Anchorage, Alaska. 85,917, CP Medical Inc., Portland, Oregon. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. 85,696, Hewlett Packard Company, Omaha, Nebraska. 85,853, Hewlett Packard Company, Omaha, Nebraska. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the Department’s previous negative determination, and therefore, further investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose. 85,794, Weyant Trucking, LLC, Friedens, Pennsylvania. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of April 13, 2015 through April 24, 2015. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site www.tradeact/ taa/taa_search_form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 365–6822. VerDate Sep<11>2014 [FR Doc. 2015–12882 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am] Houston Manufacturing, including on-site leased workers from Advantage Technical Resourcing, Bucher and Christian Consulting, Inc., CBSI LLC, Manpower, National Employment Service, Pinnacle Technical Resources, Inc., and Staff Management (a subsidiary of Seaton, LLC), Houston, Texas, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 15, 2013 through March 2, 2017, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Hewlett-Packard Co. HP Enterprise Group Americas Supply Chain Houston Manufacturing Including OnSite Leased Workers From Advantage Technical Resourcing, Bucher and Christian Consulting, Inc., CBSI LLC, Manpower, National Employment Service, Pinnacle Technical Resources, Inc., and Staff Management (a Subsidiary of Seaton, LLC) Houston, Texas; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April 2015. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 2, 2015, applicable to workers of Hewlett-Packard Co., HP Enterprise Group, Americas Supply Chain Houston Manufacturing, including on-site leased workers from Advantage Technical Resourcing, Bucher and Christian Consulting, Inc., CBSI LLC, Manpower, National Employment Service, Pinnacle Technical Resources, Inc., and Staff Management, Houston, Texas. The workers were engaged in activities related to the production of server cabinets and parts. At the request of a state workforce official to clarify the worker group, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that the leased worker agency, Staff Management, is a subsidiary of Seaton, LLC. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Staff Management (a subsidiary of Seaton, LLC) working on-site at the Houston, Texas location of HewlettPackard Co., HP Enterprise Group, Americas Supply Chain Houston Manufacturing. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–85,726 is hereby issued as follows: [TA–W–85,674] All workers of Hewlett-Packard Co., HP Enterprise Group, Americas Supply Chain PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2015–12879 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Levi Strauss & Company Eugene, Oregon; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration On March 10, 2015, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of Levi Strauss and Company, Eugene, Oregon. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 31, 2015 (80 FR 17080). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on findings that the worker separations at Levi Strauss & Co., Eugene, Oregon are not attributable to increased imports of articles or a shift in production of articles to a foreign country. The investigation also confirmed that the subject firm is not a Supplier or Downstream Producer. The request for reconsideration asserts that the workers perform E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM 28MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Notices production forecasting activities and order management support of Levi Strauss’ production of clothing and apparel. The reconsideration application concludes that both activities drive production and has been shifted to a foreign country. Information obtained during the investigation confirmed that Levi Strauss & Co. does not produce articles within the United States. The investigation confirmed that all production of articles for the Levi Strauss & Co. brand is done by another firm not covered under the definition of a ‘‘firm’’ in 29 CFR 90.2. Therefore, after careful review of the request for reconsideration, the Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met. Conclusion After careful review, I determine that the requirements of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272, have not been met and, therefore, deny the petition for group eligibility of Levi Strauss & Company, Eugene, Oregon, to apply for adjustment assistance, in accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273. Signed in Washington, DC, on this 22nd day of April, 2015. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2015–12884 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained free of charge from the RegInfo.gov Web site at https:// www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201409-1205-004 (this link will only become active on May 30, 2015) or by contacting Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693–4129, TTY 202–693–8064, (these are not tollfree numbers) or by email at DOL_PRA_ PUBLIC@dol.gov. Submit comments about this request by mail or courier to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL–ETA, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 202– 395–5806 (this is not a toll-free number); or by email: OIRA_ submission@omb.eop.gov. Commenters are encouraged, but not required, to send a courtesy copy of any comments by mail or courier to the U.S. Department of Labor—OASAM, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Attn: Departmental Information Compliance Management Program, Room N1301, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; or by email: DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693–4129, TTY 202–693–8064, (these are not toll-free numbers) or by email at DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D). DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; YouthBuild Reporting System ACTION: Notice. On May 29, 2015, the Department of Labor (DOL) will submit the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) sponsored information collection request (ICR) titled, ‘‘YouthBuild Reporting System,’’ to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval for continued use, without change, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Public comments on the ICR are invited. DATES: The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives on or before June 29, 2015. ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation; asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 May 27, 2015 This ICR seeks to extend PRA authority for the YouthBuild Reporting System information collection. YouthBuild grantees collect and report selected standardized information pertaining to customers in YouthBuild programs for general program oversight, evaluation, and performance assessment purposes. The ETA provides all grantees with a YouthBuild management information system to use for collecting participant data and for preparing and submitting the required quarterly reports. YouthBuild Transfer Act section 2(c)(4)(L) and Workforce Investment Act sections 185(d) and 189(d) authorize this information collection. See 29 U.S.C. 2918a.(2)(c)(4)(L), 2935(d), 2939(d). This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public is generally not required to respond to an information collection, unless it is approved by the OMB under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30493 notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval for this information collection under Control Number 1205–0464. OMB authorization for an ICR cannot be for more than three (3) years without renewal, and the current approval for this collection is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2015. The DOL seeks to extend PRA authorization for this information collection for three (3) more years, without any change to existing requirements. The DOL notes that existing information collection requirements submitted to the OMB receive a month-to-month extension while they undergo review. For additional substantive information about this ICR, see the related notice published in the Federal Register on March 26, 2015 (80 FR 16209). Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the address shown in the ADDRESSES section within thirty (30) days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. In order to help ensure appropriate consideration, comments should mention OMB Control Number 1205–0464. The OMB is particularly interested in comments that: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Agency: DOL–ETA. Title of Collection: YouthBuild Reporting System. OMB Control Number: 1205–0464. Affected Public: Individuals or Households and Private Sector—not-forprofit institutions. Total Estimated Number of Respondents: 7,225. E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM 28MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30492-30493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,674]


Levi Strauss & Company Eugene, Oregon; Notice of Negative 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On March 10, 2015, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of Levi Strauss and Company, Eugene, Oregon. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on March 31, 2015 (80 FR 
17080).
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on findings that the worker separations at Levi Strauss & Co., 
Eugene, Oregon are not attributable to increased imports of articles or 
a shift in production of articles to a foreign country. The 
investigation also confirmed that the subject firm is not a Supplier or 
Downstream Producer.
    The request for reconsideration asserts that the workers perform

[[Page 30493]]

production forecasting activities and order management support of Levi 
Strauss' production of clothing and apparel. The reconsideration 
application concludes that both activities drive production and has 
been shifted to a foreign country.
    Information obtained during the investigation confirmed that Levi 
Strauss & Co. does not produce articles within the United States. The 
investigation confirmed that all production of articles for the Levi 
Strauss & Co. brand is done by another firm not covered under the 
definition of a ``firm'' in 29 CFR 90.2.
    Therefore, after careful review of the request for reconsideration, 
the Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.

Conclusion

    After careful review, I determine that the requirements of Section 
222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272, have not been met and, therefore, deny 
the petition for group eligibility of Levi Strauss & Company, Eugene, 
Oregon, to apply for adjustment assistance, in accordance with Section 
223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on this 22nd day of April, 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-12884 Filed 5-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.