Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 30490-30492 [2015-12882]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
30490
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Notices
Division, Lenoir, North Carolina (TA–W–
85,578A), who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
October 7, 2013 through two years from the
date of this certification, are eligible to apply
for adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to
apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
trade adjustment assistance under Section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Pixel Playground Inc., Woodland Hills,
California.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
April, 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2015–12880 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of
November, 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Editorial Note: This document was
received for publication by the Office of the
Federal Register on May 22, 2015.
[TA–W–83,367]
[FR Doc. 2015–12881 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–85,844]
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A Schulman, Inc. Including Workers
Whose Wages Are Reported Under
Ferro Corp. Stryker, Ohio; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on March 18, 2015,
applicable to workers from A Schulman,
Inc., Stryker, Ohio. The Department’s
Notice of Determination was published
in the Federal Register on April 13,
2015 (80 FR 19691).
At the request of a State Workforce
Official, the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject
firm. The workers were engaged in the
production of plastic colorants.
The investigation confirmed that
workers’ wages were reported under
Ferro Corp., FEIN 34–0217820. Based on
these findings, the Department is
amending this certification to include
workers whose wages were reported
under Ferro Corp., FEIN 34–0217820.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–85,844 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of A Schulman, Inc., including
workers whose wages were reported under
Ferro Corp., Stryker, Ohio, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after February 19, 2014
through March 18, 2017, are eligible to apply
for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended,
and are also eligible to apply for alternative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 May 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
Employment and Training
Administration
Pixel Playground, Inc., Woodland Hills,
California; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
On December 9, 2014, the Department
of Labor issued a Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance applicable to workers and
former workers of Pixel Playground,
Inc., Woodland Hills, California (subject
firm). The Department’s Notice was
published in the Federal Register on
September 29, 2014 (79 FR 58383).
Workers at the subject firm were
engaged in employment related to the
supply of digital augmentation services.
In an application dated January 26,
2015, a former worker via legal counsel
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination applicable to workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
request for reconsideration alleges that
workers at the subject firm are eligible
to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) under Section 222(b)
of the Trade Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(b).
A careful review of administrative
record and additional investigation
confirmed the following:
Section 222(b)(1) has been met
because a significant number or
proportion of the workers in such
workers’ firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated.
Section 222(b)(2) has been met
because Pixel Playground Inc.,
Woodland Hills, California is a Supplier
to a firm that employed a group of
workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a), and such supply
is related to the service that was the
basis for such certification.
Section 222(b)(3)(B) has been met
because the loss of business by Pixel
Playground Inc., Woodland Hills,
California with the firm that employed
a certified worker group contributed
importantly to worker separations at
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
After careful review, I determine that
workers and former workers of the
subject firm, who are engaged in
employment related to the supply of
digital augmentation services, meet the
worker group certification criteria under
Section 222(b) of the Act, 19 U.S.C.
2272(b). In accordance with Section 223
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the
following certification:
All workers of Pixel Playground Inc.,
Woodland Hills, California, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after April 23, 2012
through two years from the date of this
certification, and all workers in the group
threatened with total or partial separation
from employment on the date of certification
through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 22nd day
of April 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015–12883 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of April 13, 2015 through April
24, 2015.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Notices
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production
by such workers’ firm or subdivision to
a foreign country of articles like or
directly competitive with articles which
are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) the workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) either—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:59 May 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and
the component parts it supplied for the
firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) a loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
85,826, Safariland, LLC, Ontario.
California. February 10, 2014.
85,859, Pfizer—Rouses Point, Rouses
Point, New York. April 26, 2015.
85,859A, Leased Workers From Atrium,
Rouses Point, New York. February
27, 2014.
85,872, Concurrent Manufacturing
Solutions, LLC, Ozark, Missouri.
March 10, 2014.
85,873, John Deere Waterloo Works,
Waterloo, Iowa. March 5, 2014.
85,886, Instrumentation and Specialty
Controls (ISC), West Chicago,
Illinois. March 18, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30491
85,886A, Instrumentation and Specialty
Controls (ISC), Grand Junction,
Colorado. March 18, 2014.
85,888, General Mills, New Albany,
Indiana. March 18, 2014.
85,900, Fort Dearborn Company,
Bowling Green, Kentucky. March
25, 2014.
85,906, Finisar Corporation, Horsham,
Pennsylvania. May 18, 2015.
85,922, Chromalloy Gas Turbine, LLC,
Gardena, California. April 9, 2015.
85,924, AstraZeneca LP, Westborough,
Massachusetts. March 31, 2014.
85,926, KIK Custom Products, Inc.,
Memphis, Tennessee. April 7, 2014.
85,931, Mage Solar USA, Dublin,
Georgia. March 30, 2014.
85,938, Technicolor Videocassette of
Michigan Inc., Livonia, Michigan.
May 16, 2015.
85,938A, Leased Workers from
Employment Plus, Livonia,
Michigan. April 2, 2014.
83,367, Pixel Playground, Inc.,
Woodland Hills, California. April
23, 2012.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
85,781, Asahi America, Inc., Lawrence,
Massachusetts.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
85,790, Corsa Coal Corporation,
Friedens, Pennsylvania.
85,898, Siemens Energy Inc., Mount
Vernon, Ohio.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
85,788, Engineered Polymer Solutions,
Garland, Texas.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
30492
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of
April 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
85,832, BpRex Healthcare Brookville,
Inc., Brookville, Pennsylvania.
85,835, S4 Carlisle Publishing Services,
Dubuque, Iowa.
85,871, Multiband Corporation,
Richmond, Kentucky.
85,878, MicroTelecom Systems LLC,
Uniondale, New York.
85,882, The Nielsen Company (US),
LLC, Shelton, Connecticut.
Employment and Training
Administration
18:18 May 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA–W–85,726]
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
85,883, Schlumberger, Anchorage,
Alaska.
85,917, CP Medical Inc., Portland,
Oregon.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of
workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
no purpose since the petitioning group
of workers cannot be covered by more
than one certification at a time.
85,696, Hewlett Packard Company,
Omaha, Nebraska.
85,853, Hewlett Packard Company,
Omaha, Nebraska.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the Department issued a
negative determination on petitions
related to the relevant investigation
period applicable to the same worker
group. The duplicative petitions did not
present new information or a change in
circumstances that would result in a
reversal of the Department’s previous
negative determination, and therefore,
further investigation would duplicate
efforts and serve no purpose.
85,794, Weyant Trucking, LLC, Friedens,
Pennsylvania.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of April 13,
2015 through April 24, 2015. These
determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site www.tradeact/
taa/taa_search_form.cfm under the
searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888–
365–6822.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
[FR Doc. 2015–12882 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
Houston Manufacturing, including on-site
leased workers from Advantage Technical
Resourcing, Bucher and Christian Consulting,
Inc., CBSI LLC, Manpower, National
Employment Service, Pinnacle Technical
Resources, Inc., and Staff Management (a
subsidiary of Seaton, LLC), Houston, Texas,
who became totally or partially separated
from employment on or after December 15,
2013 through March 2, 2017, and all workers
in the group threatened with total or partial
separation from employment on the date of
certification through two years from the date
of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Hewlett-Packard Co. HP Enterprise
Group Americas Supply Chain
Houston Manufacturing Including OnSite Leased Workers From Advantage
Technical Resourcing, Bucher and
Christian Consulting, Inc., CBSI LLC,
Manpower, National Employment
Service, Pinnacle Technical
Resources, Inc., and Staff Management
(a Subsidiary of Seaton, LLC) Houston,
Texas; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day
of April 2015.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on March 2, 2015, applicable
to workers of Hewlett-Packard Co., HP
Enterprise Group, Americas Supply
Chain Houston Manufacturing,
including on-site leased workers from
Advantage Technical Resourcing,
Bucher and Christian Consulting, Inc.,
CBSI LLC, Manpower, National
Employment Service, Pinnacle
Technical Resources, Inc., and Staff
Management, Houston, Texas. The
workers were engaged in activities
related to the production of server
cabinets and parts.
At the request of a state workforce
official to clarify the worker group, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
company reports that the leased worker
agency, Staff Management, is a
subsidiary of Seaton, LLC.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased
from Staff Management (a subsidiary of
Seaton, LLC) working on-site at the
Houston, Texas location of HewlettPackard Co., HP Enterprise Group,
Americas Supply Chain Houston
Manufacturing.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–85,726 is hereby issued as
follows:
[TA–W–85,674]
All workers of Hewlett-Packard Co., HP
Enterprise Group, Americas Supply Chain
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2015–12879 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Levi Strauss & Company Eugene,
Oregon; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On March 10, 2015, the Department of
Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of Levi Strauss and
Company, Eugene, Oregon. The notice
was published in the Federal Register
on March 31, 2015 (80 FR 17080).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on
findings that the worker separations at
Levi Strauss & Co., Eugene, Oregon are
not attributable to increased imports of
articles or a shift in production of
articles to a foreign country. The
investigation also confirmed that the
subject firm is not a Supplier or
Downstream Producer.
The request for reconsideration
asserts that the workers perform
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30490-30492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12882]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of April
13, 2015 through April 24, 2015.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially
[[Page 30491]]
separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) the workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) a loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
85,826, Safariland, LLC, Ontario. California. February 10, 2014.
85,859, Pfizer--Rouses Point, Rouses Point, New York. April 26, 2015.
85,859A, Leased Workers From Atrium, Rouses Point, New York. February
27, 2014.
85,872, Concurrent Manufacturing Solutions, LLC, Ozark, Missouri. March
10, 2014.
85,873, John Deere Waterloo Works, Waterloo, Iowa. March 5, 2014.
85,886, Instrumentation and Specialty Controls (ISC), West Chicago,
Illinois. March 18, 2014.
85,886A, Instrumentation and Specialty Controls (ISC), Grand Junction,
Colorado. March 18, 2014.
85,888, General Mills, New Albany, Indiana. March 18, 2014.
85,900, Fort Dearborn Company, Bowling Green, Kentucky. March 25, 2014.
85,906, Finisar Corporation, Horsham, Pennsylvania. May 18, 2015.
85,922, Chromalloy Gas Turbine, LLC, Gardena, California. April 9,
2015.
85,924, AstraZeneca LP, Westborough, Massachusetts. March 31, 2014.
85,926, KIK Custom Products, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee. April 7, 2014.
85,931, Mage Solar USA, Dublin, Georgia. March 30, 2014.
85,938, Technicolor Videocassette of Michigan Inc., Livonia, Michigan.
May 16, 2015.
85,938A, Leased Workers from Employment Plus, Livonia, Michigan. April
2, 2014.
83,367, Pixel Playground, Inc., Woodland Hills, California. April 23,
2012.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
85,781, Asahi America, Inc., Lawrence, Massachusetts.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
85,790, Corsa Coal Corporation, Friedens, Pennsylvania.
85,898, Siemens Energy Inc., Mount Vernon, Ohio.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
85,788, Engineered Polymer Solutions, Garland, Texas.
[[Page 30492]]
85,832, BpRex Healthcare Brookville, Inc., Brookville, Pennsylvania.
85,835, S4 Carlisle Publishing Services, Dubuque, Iowa.
85,871, Multiband Corporation, Richmond, Kentucky.
85,878, MicroTelecom Systems LLC, Uniondale, New York.
85,882, The Nielsen Company (US), LLC, Shelton, Connecticut.
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.
85,883, Schlumberger, Anchorage, Alaska.
85,917, CP Medical Inc., Portland, Oregon.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.
85,696, Hewlett Packard Company, Omaha, Nebraska.
85,853, Hewlett Packard Company, Omaha, Nebraska.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions
related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same
worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information
or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the
Department's previous negative determination, and therefore, further
investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose.
85,794, Weyant Trucking, LLC, Friedens, Pennsylvania.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of April 13, 2015 through April 24, 2015. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site www.tradeact/
taa/taa_search_form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations
or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at
888-365-6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of April 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-12882 Filed 5-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
