Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees To Introduce a New “Retail” Designation for Priority Customer Orders, 29136-29138 [2015-12150]
Download as PDF
29136
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2015–012 and should be submitted on
or before June 10, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12143 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74971; File No. SR–ISE
Gemini–2015–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE
Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the Schedule
of Fees To Introduce a New ‘‘Retail’’
Designation for Priority Customer
Orders
May 14, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 29,
2015, ISE Gemini, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or the ‘‘ISE Gemini’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change, as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
ISE Gemini proposes to amend the
Schedule of Fees to introduce a new
‘‘Retail’’ designation for Priority
Customer orders. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.ise.com), at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:50 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Schedule of Fees to introduce a new
‘‘Retail’’ designation for Priority
Customer orders. A ‘‘Priority Customer’’
is a person or entity that is not a broker/
dealer in securities, and does not place
more than 390 orders in listed options
per day on average during a calendar
month for its own beneficial account(s),
as defined in Rule 100(a)(37A). This
market participant type is one of six
currently recognized for purposes of
determining applicable fees and rebates,
along with: Market Maker,3 Non-ISE
Gemini Market Maker,4 Firm
Proprietary,5 Broker-Dealer,6 and
Professional Customer.7 The Priority
Customer designation was adopted by
the Exchange to provide competitive
pricing and market structure advantages
to retail investors, and to level the
playing field between retail investors
and market professionals. As such,
Priority Customer orders executed on
the Exchange are generally afforded
more favorable fees and rebates than
other market participants, including
Professional Customers. The Exchange
now believes that it is appropriate to
introduce a further distinction between
market participants that fall within the
definition of Priority Customer.
In particular, the Exchange proposes
to introduce a new ‘‘Retail’’ designation
for Priority Customer orders for the
purpose of determining applicable fees
and rebates. As proposed, a Retail order
is a Priority Customer order that
originates from a natural person,
3 The term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to
‘‘Competitive Market Makers’’ and ‘‘Primary Market
Makers’’ collectively. See Rule 100(a)(25).
4 A ‘‘Non-ISE Gemini Market Maker’’ is a market
maker as defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
registered in the same options class on another
options exchange. See Schedule of Fees, Preface.
5 A ‘‘Firm Proprietary’’ order is an order
submitted by a member for its own proprietary
account. See Schedule of Fees, Preface.
6 A ‘‘Broker-Dealer’’ order is an order submitted
by a member for a broker-dealer account that is not
its own proprietary account. See Schedule of Fees,
Preface.
7 A ‘‘Professional Customer’’ is a person or entity
that is not a broker/dealer and is not a Priority
Customer. See Schedule of Fees, Preface.
PO 00000
Frm 00208
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provided that no change is made to the
terms of the order with respect to price
or side of market and the order does not
originate from a trading algorithm or
any other computerized methodology.
The proposed definition of a Retail
order is designed to mirror a similar
concept introduced by the New York
Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’), NYSE Amex
(‘‘Amex’’), and other equities exchanges
to promote price improvement for
orders submitted by retail investors.8
The proposed rule change, however, is
intended to provide benefits to retail
options investors in the form of more
favorable pricing rather than market
structure changes.9 While the Exchange
is not amending fees and rebates
applicable to Priority Customer orders
that are designated Retail at this time,
the Exchange intends to introduce
special fees and rebates for Retail orders
at a later date, such that Retail orders
will potentially be entitled to the most
favorable fees and rebates available on
the Exchange. Until such time, Retail
orders will be charged the same fees and
provided the same rebates as other
Priority Customer orders.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.10 In particular, the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,11 because is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade,
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
Specifically, the proposed rule change
will allow the Exchange to potentially
offer more favorable fees and rebates to
Retail orders that originate from natural
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67347
(July 3, 2012), 77 FR 40673 (July 10, 2012) (SR–
NYSE–2011–55; SR–NYSEAmex–2011–84)
(Approval Order). See also NYSE and Amex Rule
107C(a)(3).
NYSE and Amex define a ‘‘Retail Order’’ as an
agency order or a riskless principal order that meets
the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates
from a natural person and is submitted to the
Exchange by a Retail Member Organization,
provided that no change is made to the terms of the
order with respect to price or side of market and
the order does not originate from a trading
algorithm or any other computerized methodology.
9 In addition, the Exchange notes that unlike the
related equities programs, all members will be
eligible to mark orders as Retail provided that the
orders meet the requirements discussed above.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
persons. Currently, the Exchange
distinguishes between orders executed
for two categories of Public Customer: 12
Priority and Professional Customers.
Priority Customers are distinguished
from Professional Customers by the
requirement that they not place more
than 390 orders in listed options per day
on average during a calendar month for
its own beneficial account(s). Because of
this limitation, Priority Customer orders
are generally afforded more favorable
fees and rebates than market
professionals, including Professional
Customers. The Exchange now believes
that it is appropriate to distinguish
further between orders that originate
from a natural person (i.e., Retail orders)
and other Priority Customer orders.
The equities markets already provide
benefits to order flow that originates
from a natural person and not a trading
algorithm or any other computerized
methodology. The Exchange believes
that the proposed definition of a Retail
order is appropriate as it is substantially
similar to the definition already used in
the equities context, and is therefore
already familiar to market participants.
The Exchange notes, however, that
unlike equities exchanges such as NYSE
and Amex, it is not proposing any
market structure changes at this time to
accompany the introduction of a Retail
designation for Priority Customer
orders. All Priority Customer orders will
continue to benefit from the current
market structure benefits that they
receive on the Exchange. In addition,
Priority Customer orders other than
Retail orders will continue to benefit
from pricing that is generally more
favorable than pricing adopted for
Professional Customer and nonCustomer orders.
By adopting a definition of Retail
order, the Exchange hopes to be able to
offer potentially more favorable fees and
rebates to retail investors. The Exchange
believes that this will advance the goals
identified when the Exchange first
introduced the Priority Customer
designation, by providing genuine retail
investors with the best prices available
on the Exchange. In this regard, the
Exchange notes that the fees and rebates
for Retail orders will initially be the
same as fees and rebates for other
Priority Customer orders; however, the
Exchange will introduce additional
pricing advantages for Retail orders at a
later date pursuant to a proposed rule
change filed with the Commission.
12 A ‘‘Public Customer’’ is a person or entity that
is not a broker or dealer in securities. See Rule
100(a)(38).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:50 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,13 the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket or
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. To the
contrary, the Exchange believes the
proposed Retail designation is an
innovative change that evidences strong
competition between options markets.
In particular, the proposed rule change
is designed to allow the Exchange to
potentially offer the most favorable fees
and rebates available to Retail orders
that originate from natural persons. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct their
order flow to competing venues. In such
an environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For
the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
changes reflect this competitive
environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange believes that the
foregoing proposed rule change may
take effect upon filing with the
Commission pursuant to
Section19(b)(3)(A) 14 of the Act and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder 15 because the
foregoing proposed rule change does not
(i) significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest, (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition, and (iii) become operative
for 30 days after its filing date, or such
shorter time as the Commission may
designate. The Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text
of the proposed rule change, at least five
13 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
14 15
PO 00000
Frm 00209
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29137
business days prior to the date of filing
the proposed rule change.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an Email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ISE Gemini–2015–09 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE Gemini–2015–09. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of ISE Gemini. All comments
received will be posted without change;
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
29138
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE
Gemini–2015–09 and should be
submitted by June 10, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12150 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74965; File No. SR–NSCC–
2015–002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Clarify NSCC’s Rules
& Procedures Relating to the Process
by Which NSCC Members Submit BuyIns Within NSCC’s Continuous Net
Settlement System
May 14, 2015.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’)
and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder, notice is
hereby given that on May 4, 2015,
National Securities Clearing Corporation
(‘‘NSCC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by NSCC. NSCC
filed the proposed rule change pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 3 of the Act and
Rule 19b–4(f)(1) 4 thereunder. The
proposed rule change was effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
The proposed rule change consists of
amendments to NSCC’s Rules &
Procedures (‘‘Rules’’) in order to clarify
those Rules relating to the process by
which NSCC Members submit buy-ins
within NSCC’s Continuous Net
Settlement (‘‘CNS’’) system, as more
fully described below.
16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1).
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:50 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NSCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. NSCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
1. Purpose
One of NSCC’s core services as a
central counterparty is trade clearance
and settlement through CNS, where
compared and recorded transactions in
eligible securities for a particular
settlement date are netted by issue into
one net long (buy) or net short (sell)
position. As a continuous net system,
those positions are further netted with
positions of the same issue that remain
open after their originally scheduled
settlement date, so that trades or
miscellaneous activity scheduled to
settle on any day are netted with fail
positions to result in a single deliver or
receive obligation for each Member for
each issue in which it has activity.
Currently, under NSCC’s Rules, a
Member with a long position at the end
of the day may submit to NSCC a Notice
of Intention to Buy-In (‘‘Buy-In Notice’’)
specifying a quantity of securities (not
exceeding such long position) (‘‘Buy-In
Position’’) that it intends to purchase to
satisfy the fail that resulted in that long
position, or ‘‘buy-in’’.5 Typically, the
day the Buy-In Notice is submitted is
referred to as N, and N+1 and N+2 refer
to the succeeding days (N through N+2
is referred to as the ‘‘Buy-In Period’’).6
The Buy-In Position is given high
priority for allocation from the CNS
night cycle on N+1 through completion
of the CNS day cycle on N+2.
The CNS position of a long Member
that submits a Buy-In Notice can change
during the Buy-In Period as a result of
settling trades or miscellaneous
activity.7 Settling trades or
miscellaneous activity that reduce a
5 Members are not permitted to submit a Buy-In
Notice with respect to securities that are subject to
a voluntary corporate reorganization.
6 NSCC’s Rules provide that Members may also
submit Buy-in Retransmittal Notices on N+1. This
proposed rule clarification would apply to these
Buy-in Retransmittal Notices as well.
7 Miscellaneous activity processed by CNS that
updates the net position of a security could include,
for example, corporate actions and stock dividends.
PO 00000
Frm 00210
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Member’s CNS long position is first
applied to the Member’s current CNS
position that is not represented by the
Buy-In Position, and then that activity
may be applied to reduce the Member’s
Buy-In Position. If a Member’s Buy-In
Position is reduced as a result of settling
trades or miscellaneous activity, its BuyIn Position is adjusted to reflect the new
amount. If, at any time during the BuyIn Period, settling trades or
miscellaneous activity reduce the
Member’s long position such that the
Member becomes either short or flat in
that position, or causes the Member’s
CNS long position to be reduced to less
than its outstanding Buy-In Position in
that security, NSCC will consider that
Member’s Buy-In Position with respect
to that security complete and satisfied.
NSCC will update the Buy-In Notice to
reflect the reduced Buy-In Position if
only a portion of the Buy-In Position is
satisfied, or the Buy-In Notice will be
cancelled if the entire Buy-In Position is
satisfied by the settling trades or
miscellaneous activity.
This process by which a Buy-In
Notice would be updated to reflect
settling trades or miscellaneous activity
is not currently described in NSCC’s
Rules. As such, NSCC is proposing to
update Rule 11, Section 7 of its Rules in
order to describe the effect of settling
trades or miscellaneous activity on a
Member’s Buy-In Position. Pursuant to
this proposed rule change, NSCC’s
Rules will make clear that any portion
of a Member’s Buy-In Position would be
considered complete and satisfied if, at
any time during the Buy-in Period that
Member’s CNS long position is reduced
to less than the outstanding Buy-In
Position, or its Buy-In Position is
reduced such that the Member is either
flat or short in that security. If the entire
Buy-In Position is considered complete
and satisfied, it will be removed from
the system. The proposed rule change
would also make a technical correction
to Procedure X, as marked on Exhibit 5
hereto.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder, in
particular Section 17A(b)(3)(F) 8 because
it will promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions in that it will provide
clarity to NSCC’s Members regarding the
process by which a Buy-In Notice would
be updated to reflect settling trades or
miscellaneous activity. Additionally,
the proposed rule change constitutes a
stated policy, practice, or interpretation
8 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29136-29138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12150]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74971; File No. SR-ISE Gemini-2015-09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Schedule of Fees To Introduce a New ``Retail'' Designation for Priority
Customer Orders
May 14, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 29, 2015, ISE Gemini, LLC (the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE
Gemini'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
ISE Gemini proposes to amend the Schedule of Fees to introduce a
new ``Retail'' designation for Priority Customer orders. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(https://www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Schedule of Fees to introduce a
new ``Retail'' designation for Priority Customer orders. A ``Priority
Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a broker/dealer in
securities, and does not place more than 390 orders in listed options
per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s), as defined in Rule 100(a)(37A). This market participant
type is one of six currently recognized for purposes of determining
applicable fees and rebates, along with: Market Maker,\3\ Non-ISE
Gemini Market Maker,\4\ Firm Proprietary,\5\ Broker-Dealer,\6\ and
Professional Customer.\7\ The Priority Customer designation was adopted
by the Exchange to provide competitive pricing and market structure
advantages to retail investors, and to level the playing field between
retail investors and market professionals. As such, Priority Customer
orders executed on the Exchange are generally afforded more favorable
fees and rebates than other market participants, including Professional
Customers. The Exchange now believes that it is appropriate to
introduce a further distinction between market participants that fall
within the definition of Priority Customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market
Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See Rule
100(a)(25).
\4\ A ``Non-ISE Gemini Market Maker'' is a market maker as
defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, registered in the same options class on another options
exchange. See Schedule of Fees, Preface.
\5\ A ``Firm Proprietary'' order is an order submitted by a
member for its own proprietary account. See Schedule of Fees,
Preface.
\6\ A ``Broker-Dealer'' order is an order submitted by a member
for a broker-dealer account that is not its own proprietary account.
See Schedule of Fees, Preface.
\7\ A ``Professional Customer'' is a person or entity that is
not a broker/dealer and is not a Priority Customer. See Schedule of
Fees, Preface.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange proposes to introduce a new ``Retail''
designation for Priority Customer orders for the purpose of determining
applicable fees and rebates. As proposed, a Retail order is a Priority
Customer order that originates from a natural person, provided that no
change is made to the terms of the order with respect to price or side
of market and the order does not originate from a trading algorithm or
any other computerized methodology. The proposed definition of a Retail
order is designed to mirror a similar concept introduced by the New
York Stock Exchange (``NYSE''), NYSE Amex (``Amex''), and other
equities exchanges to promote price improvement for orders submitted by
retail investors.\8\ The proposed rule change, however, is intended to
provide benefits to retail options investors in the form of more
favorable pricing rather than market structure changes.\9\ While the
Exchange is not amending fees and rebates applicable to Priority
Customer orders that are designated Retail at this time, the Exchange
intends to introduce special fees and rebates for Retail orders at a
later date, such that Retail orders will potentially be entitled to the
most favorable fees and rebates available on the Exchange. Until such
time, Retail orders will be charged the same fees and provided the same
rebates as other Priority Customer orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67347 (July 3,
2012), 77 FR 40673 (July 10, 2012) (SR-NYSE-2011-55; SR-NYSEAmex-
2011-84) (Approval Order). See also NYSE and Amex Rule 107C(a)(3).
NYSE and Amex define a ``Retail Order'' as an agency order or a
riskless principal order that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule
5320.03 that originates from a natural person and is submitted to
the Exchange by a Retail Member Organization, provided that no
change is made to the terms of the order with respect to price or
side of market and the order does not originate from a trading
algorithm or any other computerized methodology.
\9\ In addition, the Exchange notes that unlike the related
equities programs, all members will be eligible to mark orders as
Retail provided that the orders meet the requirements discussed
above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\10\ In
particular, the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\11\ because is designed to promote just and equitable principles
of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free
and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the proposed rule change will allow the Exchange to
potentially offer more favorable fees and rebates to Retail orders that
originate from natural
[[Page 29137]]
persons. Currently, the Exchange distinguishes between orders executed
for two categories of Public Customer: \12\ Priority and Professional
Customers. Priority Customers are distinguished from Professional
Customers by the requirement that they not place more than 390 orders
in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s). Because of this limitation, Priority
Customer orders are generally afforded more favorable fees and rebates
than market professionals, including Professional Customers. The
Exchange now believes that it is appropriate to distinguish further
between orders that originate from a natural person (i.e., Retail
orders) and other Priority Customer orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ A ``Public Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a
broker or dealer in securities. See Rule 100(a)(38).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The equities markets already provide benefits to order flow that
originates from a natural person and not a trading algorithm or any
other computerized methodology. The Exchange believes that the proposed
definition of a Retail order is appropriate as it is substantially
similar to the definition already used in the equities context, and is
therefore already familiar to market participants. The Exchange notes,
however, that unlike equities exchanges such as NYSE and Amex, it is
not proposing any market structure changes at this time to accompany
the introduction of a Retail designation for Priority Customer orders.
All Priority Customer orders will continue to benefit from the current
market structure benefits that they receive on the Exchange. In
addition, Priority Customer orders other than Retail orders will
continue to benefit from pricing that is generally more favorable than
pricing adopted for Professional Customer and non-Customer orders.
By adopting a definition of Retail order, the Exchange hopes to be
able to offer potentially more favorable fees and rebates to retail
investors. The Exchange believes that this will advance the goals
identified when the Exchange first introduced the Priority Customer
designation, by providing genuine retail investors with the best prices
available on the Exchange. In this regard, the Exchange notes that the
fees and rebates for Retail orders will initially be the same as fees
and rebates for other Priority Customer orders; however, the Exchange
will introduce additional pricing advantages for Retail orders at a
later date pursuant to a proposed rule change filed with the
Commission.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\13\ the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden
on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary,
the Exchange believes the proposed Retail designation is an innovative
change that evidences strong competition between options markets. In
particular, the proposed rule change is designed to allow the Exchange
to potentially offer the most favorable fees and rebates available to
Retail orders that originate from natural persons. The Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily direct their order flow to competing venues. In such an
environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other
exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that
the proposed changes reflect this competitive environment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange believes that the foregoing proposed rule change may
take effect upon filing with the Commission pursuant to
Section19(b)(3)(A) \14\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder \15\
because the foregoing proposed rule change does not (i) significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest, (ii) impose
any significant burden on competition, and (iii) become operative for
30 days after its filing date, or such shorter time as the Commission
may designate. The Exchange provided the Commission with written notice
of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an Email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE Gemini-2015-09 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE Gemini-2015-09. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of ISE Gemini. All
comments received will be posted without change;
[[Page 29138]]
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE
Gemini-2015-09 and should be submitted by June 10, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-12150 Filed 5-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P